Scholar says something perfectly logical and reasonable backed up by evidence but not popular Ppl who are upset: Nah we will follow what our fathers followed
No, they don't. Nothing in the Quran says to cover up head to toe for women. Neither does the hadiths. There is no evidence to back up this nonsensical "Hijab" tradition.
This is how I was taught since I was a boy back in '70s. Scholars in my country agree with this position and their wifes and daughters are not wearing jilbab, just simple traditional head cover. Jilbab only came in '90s after our young men returning from Saudi started assuming teaching position, so now we have two positions. Comparing both positions is fun and exciting exercise, except lately those pro jilbab started to consider the non-jilbab as sinners, not as sisters differ in fiqh.
In the west, Muslim (and Jewish) women dress modestly as a daily matter. Some cover their hair whenever they go out in public, some only when they attend services. Either way, it's their choice and for me, a mere human, the freedom of that choice is ultimately what matters.
I love this hijab series. I thank Allah for showing me scholar like Dr.Shabbir Ally . He is a very sensible scholar, he interprets quran & hadith logically rather than just presenting his own emotions. As long as Allah has not clearly instructed women to cover their hair, women are free to choose to wear hijab or not wear hijab. But unfortunately many hadiths are interpreted with a patriarchical perspective. For example, if a women wears perfume she is sinning, if she wears makeup she is sinning, why is she sinning? Because she is stimulating men's desire. Everything what a women does is to ensure that she doesn't trigger mens desires. Most hadith interpretations are to ensure men are protected from women. This gives a picture asif islam is for men only. Whereas the islamic society during the lifetime of our prophet was a very inclusive society .men and women attended sermons , prayers and all community work together. Nowhere we can see our prophet seggregating men and women except in prayer. Then why are the scholars showing a wrong picture of Islam. Listen to scholars like @Dr. Shabbir Ally @Javed Ahmed Ghamdi @ Mufti Abu Layth you will start loving Allah more than ever
The speaker is here misguiding you sister. You can make a choice of not wearing hijab but you would definitely answer for your deeds on the day of judgement.
@@grasrymot4995 God does not impose. He guides, he orders, and judges us all. And when he bestows upon you understanding and you try to twist his words you will pay for the consequences. The choice is yours.
@@grasrymot4995 the same goes for you justifying something that God has prohibited . For 14 centuries you havnt heard anything change in regards to hijab but now you hear your favorite personality(s) on youtube interpreting God words to fulfill your whims and desires and you think there right? Did you forget what's happened for past 14 centuries??. Stop being so naive, gullible and vulnerable. Fear Allah (swt)
Dr Shabbir Ally is not a jurist He has no expertise nor proper knowledge in the matter of Islamic jurisprudence. I advise you to consult a jurist regarding this issue. It'd be sad to see you lead astray by a person who is not qualified to speak about it.
Thank you for this series and I really enjoy watching the interaction between you and Safiya and the way she asks her questions without reservation and with curiosity and you don’t dismiss her. Very heartwarming.
Sheik Khaled Abu Al fadl explanation makes sense also He explained everything in detail I might have even tilt toward the side of the scholars that said covering hair is an injunction from Allah but then why did they have to differentiate between a slave woman and free woman dressing Why can a slave woman open between her navel to knee and pray with hair open if it's truly from Allah It therefore means that they got their law from the socio-cultural setting not the Quran because the verse in the Quran said qul lil muminat(all believing women;or where there no believers amongst the slaves?) Even during the early days women have their hairs open in parts of Egypt and the likes Funniest thing there was a time when covering hair for male was even an issue. Why male didn't fight and say 'yes they usually cover their hair during the Prophet's time' and go ahead covering their hair. I'm not using this particular point as an argument coz it sounds incoherent.I'm just saying if you want to say the heads of the female companions are usually covered then same for the male also. So it can't be a valid argument. For more listen to Sheik Khaled lectures on hijab and LEAVE WOMEN ALONE. It's getting sickening .
Great session! Thank you. ❤️ Repeatedly the phrase "The Quran is not clear" is being used in this series, which I feel, is not appropriate. The Quran categorically claims that it is clear and easy [15:1; 54:17]. So we need to sincerely ponder on these claims of the Quran and stay away from using sweeping-phrases like this just to obscure our limitation of understanding created by ourselves. To my humble understanding, if we take the Quranic Verses and use our intellect (Aql) [the Quran asks us to do so], all these verses under discourse will be clear to us. Problem occurs when we try to equate the cultural practices with the Quranic guidance and find inconsistency. The Quran is clear, it is we who make our understanding of the Quran difficult and get overwhelmed when we do not find something in the Quran that we practise or we prefer. Our practices have errors and exaggerations while the Quran stands correct and clear. Our forefathers did not always have correct understanding of Deen [2:170] and there were co-existence of exaggerated practices those have been misattributed to Deen Islam by our predecessors. Six books of Sihah Sitta are not that Sahih as we think of, which has already been established by many [Focus has to be on Matn/contents, not on Sanad/chain of narration]. To extract the Quranic guidance, one has to unlearn what has been learnt of the Deen that are additional or exaggeration or contradictory to the Quran. Having done so, if we approach the Quran, In Shaa Allah, the Quran will be clearer to us. Allah teaches the Quran to us [55:1-2]. If we qualify with our conviction, sincerity and honesty, I firmly believe that Allah will make things clear to us by His amazing teaching method engaging our God-given consciousness.
Great comment @Omar Hayat. If Dr. Shabir Ally or Dr. Shafia had seen this comment, should re-evaluate their talks. In the name of balancing Quran and Hadith, he should not downplay God's words in Quran. Whatever God has said in Quran about dress/modesty, are enough for humankind - people in different areas, culture will apply those guideline. There is no need of looking for uniform dress code for whole Muslim/World. You will not find in the Quran the specific dress Dr. Ally/ Dr. Shafia wearing - no need also. Our lacking of understanding Quran, or not finding contents of Hadiths in Quran should not be attributed as Quran not clear or not sufficient.
I think that if a statement is unclear in the Qur'an, then its meaning can be imagined in more than one way. I don't think people say the Qur'an in unclear because it doesn't reconcile with their cultural practices or their personal understanding. I think it's because it is not specific enough to form a clear picture in the mind about some issues. Maybe some things are left unclear so that we can adapt to the changing times we will live in. If the world just stayed static, it would be easier to navigate. Al Baqara starts out with, "This book is a guidance, sure . . . ." I don't think the words guidance and rule book are interchangeable. I think the Qur'an is a guidance for us and the changing times we will live in, and it's up to us to discern which things are as applicable and appropriate to today as they were to the Prophet's time. The Qur'an seems to have an inbuilt flexibility. I know I could be wrong about this, but that's just how I see it.
When he says that the Quran is not clear, he means that the Quran doesn’t explicitly tell you to cover this, this & this part of the body. And he is correct in that
@@bluespaceman7937 If you are asking me, as an example, the pivotal point in applying "what normally appears" would be whether in a culture people normally cover their hair. or not. In the US, Europe, Asia, almost no one covers her hair unless to keep it clean. So, I think it's unnecessary to do so. American men have been asked what attracts them to a woman and they say, "Her face" not her hair. If they aren't attracted to her face, forget it.
I am not a Muslim, but for the first time I see a meaningful conversation. Interesting how people interpreted things differently and evolved into something else. I hoping more Muslims watch this and get a better understanding of their religion.
The Qur’anic verse obligating women to cover their hair is as follows: “Tell the believing women to…draw their headscarves over their chests…” [Qur’an 24:31] Different translations of the Qur’an have rendered the Arabic word khumur [singular: khimār] as ‘veils’ [Yusuf Ali], ‘scarves’ [Abdul Majid Daryabadi] and ‘shawls’ [Taqi Usmani]. Even though it is common to use the word ḥijāb nowadays to refer to the headscarf, the word used in the Qur’an was khimār. It is important to understand that the word used only has the meaning of a headscarf, and not any other article of clothing. It cannot refer to a scarf that is draped around the neck nor to a shawl that is used to cover other parts of the body. The word khimār [meaning headscarf] is similar to the word ‘hat’. Both of them are used to cover the head. Therefore, if someone were to say, “make sure your hat covers your ears,” the covering of the head would automatically be implied in the sentence because that is what the function of a hat is. Were someone to argue that since the head was not explicitly mentioned, they could dangle a hat off each ear and this would fulfill what the speaker said, it would be dismissed as ridiculous. Likewise is the case of someone who assumes the verse is telling women to use a headscarf to only cover their chest area and not their head. This should serve as a sufficient answer to people who ask, “Where does Allah tell women to cover the hair in the Qur’an?” One might ask why Allah used this manner of speaking. Why didn’t He just mention that women must cover their hair, in plain and clear wording, so that there would be no confusion among people today? In order to answer such a question, the historical context in which the Qur’an was revealed must be understood. Women in many parts of the world used to cover their hair. In Arabia, they used a headscarf which would cover their hair and then they would drape the ends of that scarf behind their shoulders.[1] The verse clarified to women that this is not sufficient for modesty because the neck and upper-chest areas are exposed, so they must drape their headscarves over their chest areas to make sure that part is covered as well. Since women were already covering their head there was no need to tell them to cover it again. The case is similar to a corporation that tells their employees the dress code at work requires everyone to ensure that their shirt is buttoned up to the top so that the upper-chest area is not exposed. It is common culture for people to already wear shirts to work so there is no need to explain to these employees that the shirt must cover their entire back, stomach and chest areas: that would be redundant and unnecessary. Another angle to look at this issue from is to consider what the implications of the contrary argument would be. I have personally heard several people arguing that the ‘chest’ referred to in the verse is speaking about the breasts of a woman. The argument goes that Arab women used to not cover their breasts in public and the verse is ordering them to cover up. If this was the case, and if the verse required only covering the chest, as is claimed, then the rest of the verse would appear very problematic: “Tell the believing women to…draw their headscarves over their chests…except in front of their husbands, their fathers, their husbands’ fathers, their sons, their husbands’ sons, their brothers or their brothers’ sons, or their sisters’ sons…” This reading would imply that a woman does not need to cover her chest [i.e. breasts] in front of all the male relatives mentioned. It is doubtful that people who make such an argument would be comfortable with such a conclusion. The final point worth mentioning is that, as far as I know, no recognized Muslim scholar for at least a thousand years after the revelation of the Qur’an has ever made an argument to the contrary about women being required to cover their hair in public. Furthermore, no Arabic linguist, as far as I know, has ever argued that a khimār is anything but a head cover. This is significant because it would mean that people who do make such an argument, namely, that a headscarf is not a requirement, have discovered something which eluded Muslims for centuries. It has not been a matter of legitimate scholarly debate in the past and it is highly unlikely that something so significant, and public, would have been completely misunderstood for such a long time. It is more probable that people who do make such an argument are, intentionally or otherwise, using intellectual gymnastics to ‘reinterpret’ the Qur’an to mean something that it doesn’t. Following the tenets of Islam is a choice. Choices should be grounded in accurate information. It is hoped that this explanation clarifies what the Qur’an really says on this issue.
Some classical Scholars such as ibn hazam said that women do not need to cover their heads. Ironic how you blindly follow your scholars and prove that you're using excuses that are mentioned in the Quran. Oh ya this part needs to be mentioned as well: men in the past covered their heads as well. Doesn't men it's must for men as well. There is nothing in the Quran or Sunnah that actually and explicitly says that women have to wear the hijab. Stop blind following your dear scholars and biased desires. We do not need pathetic individuals who spread misinformation and cause harm
@@Chaos_personified. ironic only if youre blind to the point that you can only see the surface and think those who say the hijab isn't compulsory, only believe that cuz it's not in the Quran. Not all muslims are deluded to believe that "Ah if Allah had said hijab is compulsory then it would've been compulsory". Many of us believe that Allah didn't make it compulsory because there's absolutely nothing immodest about a woman not covering her head and hair. Hence why I'm using reason unlike those who don't. Why do you think I said men covered their head during the prophet's time as well? When I could've just left by only saying it's not in the Quran or Muhammad's so called Sunnah?
@@phiuzu5487 I'm not saying it's compulsory Just saying that's what happen. And unauthentic hadiths are twisted to fit into the claim. Yh after being open minded listening to a scholar and all I came to the conclusion that it's definitely not compulsory. Sad some Muslim women are being tortured coz of this making them have an antagonistic behavior toward Islam
What normally appears is subjective as it is. In my personal opinion, a woman's adornments are the body parts not prominent for men, or the body parts that are sexually arousing and should be kept away
This is my stance. Also when we think about Wudu in context of the Quran it makes sense that all the parts of the body that are exposed are the same ones that we are called to was before prayer. This includes the hair.
But when our prophet Muhammed pbuh said a hand dpand or a cubic longer than the males dress, doesn't it make sense that it will reach to the ankles or heels as the men were taught to have it above that?
That verse says that Allah's curse will be on those who drag their clothes or garments accross the floor, but women are simply "allowed" up to a hand length and they wont be one of those who are cursed. Doesn't mean this is the dress code for women.
I noticed subhanallah how God really put exact explanations and details in some verses like who are the mahrams of women, or how to do or handle certain situations. You see how great details have been specified. Also what men get in jannah but nothing about women, i hear a great shirh saying perhaps silence speaks more than words in that case. Maybe in the Quran speaking about the hijab it is the same aswell. God didnt specify for a reason, perhaps if you cover your chest and wear in on your head, with ample clothing, perhaps it is enough? Only allah knows , it is just my understanding
Each of the sahaba are like stars, and even if u follow any one of them, you're sure to succeed So we just need to know what any or all of the sahaba women wore after all of the rules were given to conclude the path to success
Showing any body feature during war shouldn't be a problem at all if the women are helping, fighting alongside, moving from place to place - being displaced, so I don't agree with the men who are claiming women should remain covered in such situations.
4 หลายเดือนก่อน
Thank you for his detailed research on the subject but I am a little confused. Surah Nur, Ayah 31 says the headcovering should cover the chest (bosom) as well... Also, Surah Al-Ahzab, Ayah 59 orders all believing women to let down their outer garment... If there is no Hadith explaining these with further details that means the standard we have is what is depicted in these two ayaat? Cover your body and head including neck and chest with a cover... right? If there is any other details given by scholars they are just comments or wishful thinking of theirs, no?
Surprisingly people who are so blind Hadith followers shockingly the books of bhukari never addresses the covering of the head or face, also sahi Muslim doesn’t even addresses it only told to cover their awrah, only Hadith that is reported is Sunan Abu dawood who is not considered 100% authentic unlike bhukari
With all due respect .Theres no not " being specific" in the Quran and hadiths put together. The word " hayya," shame and modesty encompasses it all.The religion is hayya! That's the highest and" ultimate jump "the religion takes.
I want to hear about: the quran about hijab, because in my opinion it said it all. Is safiyyah's hijab correct according to hadith? To quran? In my tough if safiyah tried to show one of her beauties through her outfit, she then broke the hijab rule of the quran. My point is that the majority of viewers want solutions, not a philosophical or a perfectly frank and logically "squared" opinion about a part of maybe unauthentic hadith. Also every authentic hadith that matches the quuran is taken as granted. Not forget to mention that may allah bless those schollars for their efforts. Thanks to them and to god before all we have more ideas about our religion. And may allah bless both of you! Each person with a bad intention, allah knows it, and through all this the religion is preserved. Finally what is great about science of hadith is that it mentions the certainty and it is dicussable in some view, some other hadiths are almost as authentic and applicable as the curan. And after all, the ruler or the tradition should mention if 10 cm before the foot is considered as an attraction, when it is about details and also the women herserlf. As an example, a lot of wemon I know personnaly wear extra large clothes to cover specific parts which fitter wemon wont do, just to be sure about hijab and because also she knows what precaution she will be happy with when she's outside. Those kind of Islam rullings are taken as a prevention and in the same manner as our doctor has said, the quuran will show as where are the limits of each jump (I'm not quoting). Not to forget to mention that hijab is not only about women's outfit, it is also about the people's hearth. Quuran orders men and wemon to not sneak to others in a bad intention and this is what constitutes also the idea about hijab plus what is mentionned clearly in the quuran. A sneaking man or women can be identified easily, and by the way, actually in a the biggest coorporates in the world i wont mention the name, the eye contact limit is 5s. Above that may be considered as a sexual arrassment. It seems like people, for their own benefit, are reinventing islam slowly...
Covering the head is not farz. Otherwise men would have to as well since in the past, women were not the only ones who covered their heads. I'd advise to watch mufti abu layth's videos on hijab. He even said in one of his videos that while it is up to the individual's choice to cover the head, we can not force that the head covering is obligatory when unlike other body parts it is not explicitly mentioned to be must covered in the Quran and sunnah. To paraphrase him, this should ring alarm bells
@@phiuzu5487Yh Perhaps Sheik Khaled Abu Al fadl videos will do justice to this He backs his with facts and evidence that it'll be difficult for someone not to be open minded in what he says.
I would title these as: #hijab #WomensClothing #Islam The Evolution (01) | Dr. Shabir Ally |#Muslim #Facecover - Hadiths #hijab #WomensClothing #Islam The Evolution (01) | Dr. Shabir Ally |#Muslim #Facecover - Quran Since this a very hot topic for anyone, these clear, factual information backed up authentic texts should be seen by as many as possible. The current Title tag may not show up in relevant searches for these topics.
(3424) ' A'isha (Allah be pleased with her) reported that Sahla bint Suhail came to Allah's Apostle (may peace be eupon him) and said: Messengerof Allah, I see on the face of Abu Hudhaifa (signs of disgust) on entering of Salim (who is an ally) into (our house), whereupon Allah's Apostle (may peace be upon him) said: Suckle him. She said: How can I suckle him as he is a grown-up man? Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) smiled and said: I already know that he is a young man 'Amr has made this addition in his narration that he participated in the Battle of Badr and in the narration of Ibn 'Umar (the words are): Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) laughed. (3425) 'A'isha (Allah be pleased with her) reported that Salim, the freed slave of Abu Hadhaifa, lived with him and his family in their house. She (i. e. the daughter of Suhail came to Allah's Apostle (may peace be upon him) and said: Salim has attained (purbety) as men attain, and he understands what they understand, and he enters our house freely, I, however, perceive that something (rankles) in the heart of Abu Hudhaifa, whereupon Allah's Apostle (may peace be upon him) said to her: Suckle him and you would become unlawful for him, and (the rankling) which Abu Hudhaifa feels in his heart will disappear. She returned and said: So I suckled him, and what (was there) in the heart of Abu Hudhaifa disappeared.
If you reject Hadith how can you perform Salah for instance? The method to perform Salah is through Sunnah n Hadith without such you'd not know how to establish the prayers mentioned in the Quran. And praying is part n parcel of being a Muslim. This is just one example.
@purple1985purple1985 the quran is clear. Pray to allah and be rightious in your thought and actions. Pray for food, pray for marriage, pray for health, pray for forgiveness. Inshallah.
@@jimholesaw6597the Quran doesn’t tell you details of how to perform prayer or wudhu like Hadith. You reject Hadith yet you follow it all the time without admitting it lmaoo
Both the Quran and the Hadith are presenting a full picture that a woman in Islam is primarily a sexual object, since the only point of the covering is to prevent the sexual provocation of the men, who aren't obligated to follow the same principle, and the covering itself isn't limited to the sexual parts, but the whole of woman's body have been sexualized and is blamed for provocation in case of a sexual abuse, what also shows that Islam puts more emphasis on defeminization of the women, rather than self-control of the men.
The west who is using women in the marketing of every single thing in ads, are the one using women as objects to attract people...... So who s objectifying them
Quran is NOT clear about what to cover, anyone who is saying that is only saying that because it satisfies the fact that they're insecure men with women they fortunately got out of luck who are probably beyond their pay grade. I agree with Dr. Shabir Ally here. Even though I may not agree with alot of other things with him.
@@nazidasyed3735 don't follow any one blindly come back to Quran and ready surah Ahzab ayat no 59 with the context of previous ayat..Shabir Ally explanation based on addition subtraction theory.. His daughter asking him a question about face cover while asking a question she herself denying it.. Take any of the arabic dictionary you will never find meaning jilbab means wrapping of the body..
I really don't understand Dr. Shabir at all. The Quran is very clear so do the Hadiths. That's how people start sects by trying to interpret things in there on way. How did women dress in during prophet Muhammad pbuh. Because everyone who in every part of the world who consider themselves Muslims have no disagreement on this issue of Islamic dress code. They're so many scholars and all agree on this issue. Am starting to loose faith on Dr.Shabir. in this world of today people are looking for a scholar who will justify there modern views on things dressing. If we now start to say the Quran and Hadith are not clear on such important issues as dressing, we'll start again to say we can have gay marriages because a prominent Muslim scholar think so. I think is better to keep it to yourself things which are not clear to you otherwise we'll start confusing majority of people with our own individual opinions. We should stick to the tradition
We shouldn't be shocked we were warned of wicked scholars leading ppl astray and 73 sects of Muslims by end of time. Stick with Quran and authentic Sunnah.
@@binabina7801 women who fear Allah (swt) don't have a problem with it nor question it . They listen and obey different strokes for different folks you can't please and appease everyone. 14 centuries of consistency and all of a sudden you hear a personality of your liking that fits your whims and desires and its a issue.?? Lol to each there own.
@@binabina7801 even Dr. Shabir is a Muslim and majority of Muslims disagree with his views on this subject. He can mislead so many Muslims like me who are not scholars who listens to scholars like him for guidance on religious matter. This issue is very clear to Muslim.
People used to venerate saints up until the 17th century in Muslim countries. There was no consistent jurisdiction. Ibn taymiyyah said Hellfire isnt eternal. If you are so dependent on scholars when there is so much free information on the internet, the problem is you. the Quran encourages seeking knowledge but you want someone to spoonfeed it to you? This is why we are never going back to the Golden Age.
I am new here, but I think this channel is only breeding skepticism about Islam rather than presenting the message of Islam. I wanted to recommend this channel to my wife the first time I saw they were going to discuss about Hijab. But I bet you no Muslim woman or man would take Hijab serious after watching these videos. I see clear verses and Hadiths talking about Hijab and I hear from a learned Muslim is that it's not clear. It makes me feel like am dreaming. The length of clothes specified for men has been used to specify women with a certain distance in addition and this should mean that these two specific limits are taken into account plus the length added for the women which would also be two. How specific is this supposed to be.
Exactly. You are so apt. I have been following this channel for long and I noticed something sinister about them. They doing a disservice in many instance to Islam. I am glad people are exposing them now.
Dr. Shabir Ally tries to educate Muslims to know their scripture because many Muslims don't understand Quran and follow blindly their imam and assume it is from Quran. One example is about hijab.
100% As they say, not all that glitters is gold. A new strategy, instead of a non-Muslim questioning Islam, they bring people who look like Muslims to question Islam.
@@gondala his understanding on hijab is so screwed. I feel he is just trying to appeal to the western narrative. But the issue of Hijab in Islam is clear and plane.
@@abdulsudaisy no. it is not the first time i hear about how Quran speak about hijab which is very different from common understanding. Yes, you have to know exactly what Quran say, and know how people interpret about it. So, what most people or majority of what believe doesn't mean they are the truth.
Most of the videos from this channel reminds me of the hadeeds below Narrated `Abdullah bin `Amr bin Al-`As: I heard Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) saying, "Allah does not take away the knowledge, by taking it away from (the hearts of) the people, but takes it away by the death of the religious learned men till when none of the (religious learned men) remains, people will take as their leaders ignorant persons who when consulted will give their verdict without knowledge. So they will go astray and will lead the people astray." Vol. 1, Book 3, Hadith 100
So u can't find an actual way to criticise the facts he's giving so ur accusing him of being wrong 😂😂 this hadith is clearly talking about the sheikhs who impose this crazy idea of hijab on women that's who this is talking about
So, we there is the Quran (final Authority, I hope?), then the Hadees followed by the commentary. I am neither of the Arab origin nor do I know Arabic, but I have read some "experts" say that Arabic is one of the hardest language to translate. Fact of the matter is most all languages are hard to translate because there is no way to translate nuances and essential element of communication. So that's the first problem, the second problem is the hadees. Islam never undertook a process of corroboration or certification of hadees these days the new age televangelists (low on scholarship and driven more by profit and notoriety) in Pakistan come with a new hadees as their hearts desire and to prove their point. Plus do not forget that a lot of this is word of mouth without the benefit of written records. Heck, the prophets biography was written what a good 75 years after he passed away. The third issue is with the commentary. Commentary is just that; a commentary an opinion. Some commentaries are closer to the facts being commented on and others well can be wild tangents going all over the place. Religion remains the opium of the masses but for some of us who have broken the chains its a more peaceful world.
Scholar says something perfectly logical and reasonable backed up by evidence but not popular
Ppl who are upset: Nah we will follow what our fathers followed
They are doing like what infidels were doing; following their fathers' steps instead of reason and logic
No, they don't. Nothing in the Quran says to cover up head to toe for women. Neither does the hadiths. There is no evidence to back up this nonsensical "Hijab" tradition.
As a Christian I say this man is a Very Great and Good man, May God Bless him
We need more people like this guy
This is how I was taught since I was a boy back in '70s. Scholars in my country agree with this position and their wifes and daughters are not wearing jilbab, just simple traditional head cover. Jilbab only came in '90s after our young men returning from Saudi started assuming teaching position, so now we have two positions.
Comparing both positions is fun and exciting exercise, except lately those pro jilbab started to consider the non-jilbab as sinners, not as sisters differ in fiqh.
Sadly wahabism increased after 70's spread of Saudi power with the oil
Which country?
@@Ar-bp2wl Oil was discovered in Saudi in 1938.
@@Ar-bp2wl actually around the 80s!
@@H0A0B123 you know about oil boom of 1979 right? jut bcz it was discovered in 1938, it does not mean anything especially since horses were the ride
In the west, Muslim (and Jewish) women dress modestly as a daily matter. Some cover their hair whenever they go out in public, some only when they attend services. Either way, it's their choice and for me, a mere human, the freedom of that choice is ultimately what matters.
I love this hijab series. I thank Allah for showing me scholar like Dr.Shabbir Ally . He is a very sensible scholar, he interprets quran & hadith logically rather than just presenting his own emotions.
As long as Allah has not clearly instructed women to cover their hair, women are free to choose to wear hijab or not wear hijab. But unfortunately many hadiths are interpreted with a patriarchical perspective. For example, if a women wears perfume she is sinning, if she wears makeup she is sinning, why is she sinning? Because she is stimulating men's desire. Everything what a women does is to ensure that she doesn't trigger mens desires. Most hadith interpretations are to ensure men are protected from women. This gives a picture asif islam is for men only. Whereas the islamic society during the lifetime of our prophet was a very inclusive society .men and women attended sermons , prayers and all community work together. Nowhere we can see our prophet seggregating men and women except in prayer.
Then why are the scholars showing a wrong picture of Islam.
Listen to scholars like @Dr. Shabbir Ally @Javed Ahmed Ghamdi @ Mufti Abu Layth you will start loving Allah more than ever
The speaker is here misguiding you sister. You can make a choice of not wearing hijab but you would definitely answer for your deeds on the day of judgement.
@@grasrymot4995 God does not impose. He guides, he orders, and judges us all. And when he bestows upon you understanding and you try to twist his words you will pay for the consequences. The choice is yours.
@@grasrymot4995 well God has declared it. Unless you are ignorant of it or hypocritical about it.
@@grasrymot4995 the same goes for you justifying something that God has prohibited . For 14 centuries you havnt heard anything change in regards to hijab but now you hear your favorite personality(s) on youtube interpreting God words to fulfill your whims and desires and you think there right? Did you forget what's happened for past 14 centuries??. Stop being so naive, gullible and vulnerable. Fear Allah (swt)
Dr Shabbir Ally is not a jurist He has no expertise nor proper knowledge in the matter of Islamic jurisprudence. I advise you to consult a jurist regarding this issue. It'd be sad to see you lead astray by a person who is not qualified to speak about it.
Thank you for this series and I really enjoy watching the interaction between you and Safiya and the way she asks her questions without reservation and with curiosity and you don’t dismiss her. Very heartwarming.
Sheik Khaled Abu Al fadl explanation makes sense also
He explained everything in detail
I might have even tilt toward the side of the scholars that said covering hair is an injunction from Allah but then why did they have to differentiate between a slave woman and free woman dressing
Why can a slave woman open between her navel to knee and pray with hair open if it's truly from Allah
It therefore means that they got their law from the socio-cultural setting not the Quran because the verse in the Quran said qul lil muminat(all believing women;or where there no believers amongst the slaves?)
Even during the early days women have their hairs open in parts of Egypt and the likes
Funniest thing there was a time when covering hair for male was even an issue.
Why male didn't fight and say 'yes they usually cover their hair during the Prophet's time' and go ahead covering their hair. I'm not using this particular point as an argument coz it sounds incoherent.I'm just saying if you want to say the heads of the female companions are usually covered then same for the male also. So it can't be a valid argument.
For more listen to Sheik Khaled lectures on hijab and LEAVE WOMEN ALONE.
It's getting sickening .
Great session! Thank you. ❤️
Repeatedly the phrase "The Quran is not clear" is being used in this series, which I feel, is not appropriate. The Quran categorically claims that it is clear and easy [15:1; 54:17]. So we need to sincerely ponder on these claims of the Quran and stay away from using sweeping-phrases like this just to obscure our limitation of understanding created by ourselves.
To my humble understanding, if we take the Quranic Verses and use our intellect (Aql) [the Quran asks us to do so], all these verses under discourse will be clear to us. Problem occurs when we try to equate the cultural practices with the Quranic guidance and find inconsistency. The Quran is clear, it is we who make our understanding of the Quran difficult and get overwhelmed when we do not find something in the Quran that we practise or we prefer. Our practices have errors and exaggerations while the Quran stands correct and clear. Our forefathers did not always have correct understanding of Deen [2:170] and there were co-existence of exaggerated practices those have been misattributed to Deen Islam by our predecessors. Six books of Sihah Sitta are not that Sahih as we think of, which has already been established by many [Focus has to be on Matn/contents, not on Sanad/chain of narration].
To extract the Quranic guidance, one has to unlearn what has been learnt of the Deen that are additional or exaggeration or contradictory to the Quran. Having done so, if we approach the Quran, In Shaa Allah, the Quran will be clearer to us. Allah teaches the Quran to us [55:1-2]. If we qualify with our conviction, sincerity and honesty, I firmly believe that Allah will make things clear to us by His amazing teaching method engaging our God-given consciousness.
How would you apply that to this situation?
Great comment @Omar Hayat. If Dr. Shabir Ally or Dr. Shafia had seen this comment, should re-evaluate their talks. In the name of balancing Quran and Hadith, he should not downplay God's words in Quran. Whatever God has said in Quran about dress/modesty, are enough for humankind - people in different areas, culture will apply those guideline. There is no need of looking for uniform dress code for whole Muslim/World. You will not find in the Quran the specific dress Dr. Ally/ Dr. Shafia wearing - no need also. Our lacking of understanding Quran, or not finding contents of Hadiths in Quran should not be attributed as Quran not clear or not sufficient.
I think that if a statement is unclear in the Qur'an, then its meaning can be imagined in more than one way. I don't think people say the Qur'an in unclear because it doesn't reconcile with their cultural practices or their personal understanding. I think it's because it is not specific enough to form a clear picture in the mind about some issues. Maybe some things are left unclear so that we can adapt to the changing times we will live in. If the world just stayed static, it would be easier to navigate. Al Baqara starts out with, "This book is a guidance, sure . . . ." I don't think the words guidance and rule book are interchangeable. I think the Qur'an is a guidance for us and the changing times we will live in, and it's up to us to discern which things are as applicable and appropriate to today as they were to the Prophet's time. The Qur'an seems to have an inbuilt flexibility. I know I could be wrong about this, but that's just how I see it.
When he says that the Quran is not clear, he means that the Quran doesn’t explicitly tell you to cover this, this & this part of the body. And he is correct in that
@@bluespaceman7937 If you are asking me, as an example, the pivotal point in applying "what normally appears" would be whether in a culture people normally cover their hair. or not. In the US, Europe, Asia, almost no one covers her hair unless to keep it clean. So, I think it's unnecessary to do so. American men have been asked what attracts them to a woman and they say, "Her face" not her hair. If they aren't attracted to her face, forget it.
Great information. May Allah Bless you All for your hardwork.
I am not a Muslim, but for the first time I see a meaningful conversation. Interesting how people interpreted things differently and evolved into something else.
I hoping more Muslims watch this and get a better understanding of their religion.
Modesty is the main message , wearing clothes where the shape of your body is not revealed,
The Qur’anic verse obligating women to cover their hair is as follows: “Tell the believing women to…draw their headscarves over their chests…” [Qur’an 24:31] Different translations of the Qur’an have rendered the Arabic word khumur [singular: khimār] as ‘veils’ [Yusuf Ali], ‘scarves’ [Abdul Majid Daryabadi] and ‘shawls’ [Taqi Usmani]. Even though it is common to use the word ḥijāb nowadays to refer to the headscarf, the word used in the Qur’an was khimār. It is important to understand that the word used only has the meaning of a headscarf, and not any other article of clothing. It cannot refer to a scarf that is draped around the neck nor to a shawl that is used to cover other parts of the body.
The word khimār [meaning headscarf] is similar to the word ‘hat’. Both of them are used to cover the head. Therefore, if someone were to say, “make sure your hat covers your ears,” the covering of the head would automatically be implied in the sentence because that is what the function of a hat is. Were someone to argue that since the head was not explicitly mentioned, they could dangle a hat off each ear and this would fulfill what the speaker said, it would be dismissed as ridiculous. Likewise is the case of someone who assumes the verse is telling women to use a headscarf to only cover their chest area and not their head. This should serve as a sufficient answer to people who ask, “Where does Allah tell women to cover the hair in the Qur’an?”
One might ask why Allah used this manner of speaking. Why didn’t He just mention that women must cover their hair, in plain and clear wording, so that there would be no confusion among people today? In order to answer such a question, the historical context in which the Qur’an was revealed must be understood. Women in many parts of the world used to cover their hair. In Arabia, they used a headscarf which would cover their hair and then they would drape the ends of that scarf behind their shoulders.[1] The verse clarified to women that this is not sufficient for modesty because the neck and upper-chest areas are exposed, so they must drape their headscarves over their chest areas to make sure that part is covered as well. Since women were already covering their head there was no need to tell them to cover it again. The case is similar to a corporation that tells their employees the dress code at work requires everyone to ensure that their shirt is buttoned up to the top so that the upper-chest area is not exposed. It is common culture for people to already wear shirts to work so there is no need to explain to these employees that the shirt must cover their entire back, stomach and chest areas: that would be redundant and unnecessary.
Another angle to look at this issue from is to consider what the implications of the contrary argument would be. I have personally heard several people arguing that the ‘chest’ referred to in the verse is speaking about the breasts of a woman. The argument goes that Arab women used to not cover their breasts in public and the verse is ordering them to cover up. If this was the case, and if the verse required only covering the chest, as is claimed, then the rest of the verse would appear very problematic: “Tell the believing women to…draw their headscarves over their chests…except in front of their husbands, their fathers, their husbands’ fathers, their sons, their husbands’ sons, their brothers or their brothers’ sons, or their sisters’ sons…” This reading would imply that a woman does not need to cover her chest [i.e. breasts] in front of all the male relatives mentioned. It is doubtful that people who make such an argument would be comfortable with such a conclusion.
The final point worth mentioning is that, as far as I know, no recognized Muslim scholar for at least a thousand years after the revelation of the Qur’an has ever made an argument to the contrary about women being required to cover their hair in public. Furthermore, no Arabic linguist, as far as I know, has ever argued that a khimār is anything but a head cover. This is significant because it would mean that people who do make such an argument, namely, that a headscarf is not a requirement, have discovered something which eluded Muslims for centuries. It has not been a matter of legitimate scholarly debate in the past and it is highly unlikely that something so significant, and public, would have been completely misunderstood for such a long time. It is more probable that people who do make such an argument are, intentionally or otherwise, using intellectual gymnastics to ‘reinterpret’ the Qur’an to mean something that it doesn’t.
Following the tenets of Islam is a choice. Choices should be grounded in accurate information. It is hoped that this explanation clarifies what the Qur’an really says on this issue.
Some classical Scholars such as ibn hazam said that women do not need to cover their heads. Ironic how you blindly follow your scholars and prove that you're using excuses that are mentioned in the Quran.
Oh ya this part needs to be mentioned as well: men in the past covered their heads as well. Doesn't men it's must for men as well. There is nothing in the Quran or Sunnah that actually and explicitly says that women have to wear the hijab.
Stop blind following your dear scholars and biased desires. We do not need pathetic individuals who spread misinformation and cause harm
@@phiuzu5487How ironic😂
Those who said hijab is compulsory points to the Quran
Those who said it isn't compulsory too points to the Quran
@@Chaos_personified. ironic only if youre blind to the point that you can only see the surface and think those who say the hijab isn't compulsory, only believe that cuz it's not in the Quran. Not all muslims are deluded to believe that "Ah if Allah had said hijab is compulsory then it would've been compulsory". Many of us believe that Allah didn't make it compulsory because there's absolutely nothing immodest about a woman not covering her head and hair. Hence why I'm using reason unlike those who don't. Why do you think I said men covered their head during the prophet's time as well? When I could've just left by only saying it's not in the Quran or Muhammad's so called Sunnah?
@@phiuzu5487 I'm not saying it's compulsory
Just saying that's what happen.
And unauthentic hadiths are twisted to fit into the claim.
Yh after being open minded listening to a scholar and all I came to the conclusion that it's definitely not compulsory.
Sad some Muslim women are being tortured coz of this making them have an antagonistic behavior toward Islam
Ras (head is not mentioned)
What normally appears is subjective as it is. In my personal opinion, a woman's adornments are the body parts not prominent for men, or the body parts that are sexually arousing and should be kept away
This is my stance. Also when we think about Wudu in context of the Quran it makes sense that all the parts of the body that are exposed are the same ones that we are called to was before prayer. This includes the hair.
@@FD12125 interesting take. I hadn't thought of it that way
Make sure you trim your pubic hair once a month!😮
But when our prophet Muhammed pbuh said a hand dpand or a cubic longer than the males dress, doesn't it make sense that it will reach to the ankles or heels as the men were taught to have it above that?
That verse says that Allah's curse will be on those who drag their clothes or garments accross the floor, but women are simply "allowed" up to a hand length and they wont be one of those who are cursed. Doesn't mean this is the dress code for women.
I noticed subhanallah how God really put exact explanations and details in some verses like who are the mahrams of women, or how to do or handle certain situations. You see how great details have been specified.
Also what men get in jannah but nothing about women, i hear a great shirh saying perhaps silence speaks more than words in that case.
Maybe in the Quran speaking about the hijab it is the same aswell. God didnt specify for a reason, perhaps if you cover your chest and wear in on your head, with ample clothing, perhaps it is enough?
Only allah knows , it is just my understanding
Each of the sahaba are like stars, and even if u follow any one of them, you're sure to succeed
So we just need to know what any or all of the sahaba women wore after all of the rules were given to conclude the path to success
Totally Hypothetical,10% agreed upon
Showing any body feature during war shouldn't be a problem at all if the women are helping, fighting alongside, moving from place to place - being displaced, so I don't agree with the men who are claiming women should remain covered in such situations.
Thank you for his detailed research on the subject but I am a little confused.
Surah Nur, Ayah 31 says the headcovering should cover the chest (bosom) as well...
Also, Surah Al-Ahzab, Ayah 59 orders all believing women to let down their outer garment... If there is no Hadith explaining these with further details that means the standard we have is what is depicted in these two ayaat? Cover your body and head including neck and chest with a cover... right? If there is any other details given by scholars they are just comments or wishful thinking of theirs, no?
So much fuss about women cloth
Is it permissible then to pray for a women without covering her head ?
Ummm, I thought we would let the Quran speak
Surprisingly people who are so blind Hadith followers shockingly the books of bhukari never addresses the covering of the head or face, also sahi Muslim doesn’t even addresses it only told to cover their awrah, only Hadith that is reported is Sunan Abu dawood who is not considered 100% authentic unlike bhukari
Alhamdulillah. Another good lesson.
With all due respect .Theres no not " being specific" in the Quran and hadiths put together.
The word " hayya," shame and modesty encompasses it all.The religion is hayya!
That's the highest and" ultimate jump "the religion takes.
I want to hear about: the quran about hijab, because in my opinion it said it all.
Is safiyyah's hijab correct according to hadith? To quran?
In my tough if safiyah tried to show one of her beauties through her outfit, she then broke the hijab rule of the quran.
My point is that the majority of viewers want solutions, not a philosophical or a perfectly frank and logically "squared" opinion about a part of maybe unauthentic hadith. Also every authentic hadith that matches the quuran is taken as granted.
Not forget to mention that may allah bless those schollars for their efforts. Thanks to them and to god before all we have more ideas about our religion. And may allah bless both of you!
Each person with a bad intention, allah knows it, and through all this the religion is preserved.
Finally what is great about science of hadith is that it mentions the certainty and it is dicussable in some view, some other hadiths are almost as authentic and applicable as the curan. And after all, the ruler or the tradition should mention if 10 cm before the foot is considered as an attraction, when it is about details and also the women herserlf. As an example, a lot of wemon I know personnaly wear extra large clothes to cover specific parts which fitter wemon wont do, just to be sure about hijab and because also she knows what precaution she will be happy with when she's outside. Those kind of Islam rullings are taken as a prevention and in the same manner as our doctor has said, the quuran will show as where are the limits of each jump (I'm not quoting). Not to forget to mention that hijab is not only about women's outfit, it is also about the people's hearth. Quuran orders men and wemon to not sneak to others in a bad intention and this is what constitutes also the idea about hijab plus what is mentionned clearly in the quuran.
A sneaking man or women can be identified easily, and by the way, actually in a the biggest coorporates in the world i wont mention the name, the eye contact limit is 5s. Above that may be considered as a sexual arrassment. It seems like people, for their own benefit, are reinventing islam slowly...
Covering the head is not farz. Otherwise men would have to as well since in the past, women were not the only ones who covered their heads. I'd advise to watch mufti abu layth's videos on hijab.
He even said in one of his videos that while it is up to the individual's choice to cover the head, we can not force that the head covering is obligatory when unlike other body parts it is not explicitly mentioned to be must covered in the Quran and sunnah. To paraphrase him, this should ring alarm bells
@@phiuzu5487Yh
Perhaps Sheik Khaled Abu Al fadl videos will do justice to this
He backs his with facts and evidence that it'll be difficult for someone not to be open minded in what he says.
Health wise that is not right bc you can lack health balance and heat issues
I would title these as:
#hijab #WomensClothing #Islam The Evolution (01) | Dr. Shabir Ally |#Muslim #Facecover - Hadiths
#hijab #WomensClothing #Islam The Evolution (01) | Dr. Shabir Ally |#Muslim #Facecover - Quran
Since this a very hot topic for anyone, these clear, factual information backed up authentic texts should be seen by as many as possible. The current Title tag may not show up in relevant searches for these topics.
Hijab is NOT a hair cover...there is no mention of coverage for the hair in Islam
The word is Khimar which means head cover modern term is hijab
(3424) ' A'isha (Allah be pleased with her) reported that Sahla bint Suhail came to Allah's Apostle (may peace be eupon him) and said: Messengerof Allah, I see on the face of Abu Hudhaifa (signs of disgust) on entering of Salim (who is an ally) into (our house), whereupon Allah's Apostle (may peace be upon him) said: Suckle him. She said: How can I suckle him as he is a grown-up man? Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) smiled and said: I already know that he is a young man 'Amr has made this addition in his narration that he participated in the Battle of Badr and in the narration of Ibn 'Umar (the words are): Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) laughed.
(3425) 'A'isha (Allah be pleased with her) reported that Salim, the freed slave of Abu Hadhaifa, lived with him and his family in their house. She (i. e. the daughter of Suhail came to Allah's Apostle (may peace be upon him) and said: Salim has attained (purbety) as men attain, and he understands what they understand, and he enters our house freely, I, however, perceive that something (rankles) in the heart of Abu Hudhaifa, whereupon Allah's Apostle (may peace be upon him) said to her: Suckle him and you would become unlawful for him, and (the rankling) which Abu Hudhaifa feels in his heart will disappear. She returned and said: So I suckled him, and what (was there) in the heart of Abu Hudhaifa disappeared.
💕
I reject the hadiths. Am. I still muslim for only accepting the quran as the perfect book
If you are ture Muslim you have to believe in both Quran and Hadith
@zeekra-khan123 no, the bible and quran. Hadiths are interpretations of allahs word. Allah doesnt need interpretation.
If you reject Hadith how can you perform Salah for instance? The method to perform Salah is through Sunnah n Hadith without such you'd not know how to establish the prayers mentioned in the Quran. And praying is part n parcel of being a Muslim. This is just one example.
@purple1985purple1985 the quran is clear. Pray to allah and be rightious in your thought and actions. Pray for food, pray for marriage, pray for health, pray for forgiveness. Inshallah.
@@jimholesaw6597the Quran doesn’t tell you details of how to perform prayer or wudhu like Hadith. You reject Hadith yet you follow it all the time without admitting it lmaoo
Both the Quran and the Hadith are presenting a full picture that a woman in Islam is primarily a sexual object, since the only point of the covering is to prevent the sexual provocation of the men, who aren't obligated to follow the same principle, and the covering itself isn't limited to the sexual parts, but the whole of woman's body have been sexualized and is blamed for provocation in case of a sexual abuse, what also shows that Islam puts more emphasis on defeminization of the women, rather than self-control of the men.
which quran did you read? lol
Correct. Islam objectifies women, and then blames them when men get aroused.
@@DestinyAwaits19 oh okay show me that part in the quran.
@@DestinyAwaits19 are you a Christian or a Hindu
The west who is using women in the marketing of every single thing in ads, are the one using women as objects to attract people...... So who s objectifying them
dont take knowledge from these people. take knowledge from Quran and Sunnah
He never denied the Quran & Sunnah
Bro, he delivered what's in the Qur'an and the Sunnah. Watch the whole series, duh
Quran is NOT clear about what to cover, anyone who is saying that is only saying that because it satisfies the fact that they're insecure men with women they fortunately got out of luck who are probably beyond their pay grade. I agree with Dr. Shabir Ally here. Even though I may not agree with alot of other things with him.
Shabir Ally did not explain properly about Jilbal... Jilbab use to wear to cover face.. There are so many hadith about wearing jilbal..
Watch episode 5 of this series. He discussed about the Jilbab there
No, Jilbab is an ourger garment similar to what red riding hood would wear. a cloak. That is all. nothing to cover face.
@@nazidasyed3735 don't follow any one blindly come back to Quran and ready surah Ahzab ayat no 59 with the context of previous ayat..Shabir Ally explanation based on addition subtraction theory.. His daughter asking him a question about face cover while asking a question she herself denying it.. Take any of the arabic dictionary you will never find meaning jilbab means wrapping of the body..
I really don't understand Dr. Shabir at all. The Quran is very clear so do the Hadiths. That's how people start sects by trying to interpret things in there on way. How did women dress in during prophet Muhammad pbuh. Because everyone who in every part of the world who consider themselves Muslims have no disagreement on this issue of Islamic dress code. They're so many scholars and all agree on this issue. Am starting to loose faith on Dr.Shabir. in this world of today people are looking for a scholar who will justify there modern views on things dressing. If we now start to say the Quran and Hadith are not clear on such important issues as dressing, we'll start again to say we can have gay marriages because a prominent Muslim scholar think so. I think is better to keep it to yourself things which are not clear to you otherwise we'll start confusing majority of people with our own individual opinions. We should stick to the tradition
We shouldn't be shocked we were warned of wicked scholars leading ppl astray and 73 sects of Muslims by end of time. Stick with Quran and authentic Sunnah.
i am muslim and I have a disagreement on this issue. dont talk for all muslims.
@@binabina7801 women who fear Allah (swt) don't have a problem with it nor question it . They listen and obey different strokes for different folks you can't please and appease everyone. 14 centuries of consistency and all of a sudden you hear a personality of your liking that fits your whims and desires and its a issue.?? Lol to each there own.
@@binabina7801 even Dr. Shabir is a Muslim and majority of Muslims disagree with his views on this subject. He can mislead so many Muslims like me who are not scholars who listens to scholars like him for guidance on religious matter. This issue is very clear to Muslim.
People used to venerate saints up until the 17th century in Muslim countries. There was no consistent jurisdiction. Ibn taymiyyah said Hellfire isnt eternal. If you are so dependent on scholars when there is so much free information on the internet, the problem is you. the Quran encourages seeking knowledge but you want someone to spoonfeed it to you? This is why we are never going back to the Golden Age.
I am new here, but I think this channel is only breeding skepticism about Islam rather than presenting the message of Islam. I wanted to recommend this channel to my wife the first time I saw they were going to discuss about Hijab. But I bet you no Muslim woman or man would take Hijab serious after watching these videos. I see clear verses and Hadiths talking about Hijab and I hear from a learned Muslim is that it's not clear. It makes me feel like am dreaming. The length of clothes specified for men has been used to specify women with a certain distance in addition and this should mean that these two specific limits are taken into account plus the length added for the women which would also be two. How specific is this supposed to be.
Exactly. You are so apt. I have been following this channel for long and I noticed something sinister about them. They doing a disservice in many instance to Islam. I am glad people are exposing them now.
Dr. Shabir Ally tries to educate Muslims to know their scripture because many Muslims don't understand Quran and follow blindly their imam and assume it is from Quran. One example is about hijab.
100% As they say, not all that glitters is gold.
A new strategy, instead of a non-Muslim questioning Islam, they bring people who look like Muslims to question Islam.
@@gondala his understanding on hijab is so screwed. I feel he is just trying to appeal to the western narrative. But the issue of Hijab in Islam is clear and plane.
@@abdulsudaisy no. it is not the first time i hear about how Quran speak about hijab which is very different from common understanding. Yes, you have to know exactly what Quran say, and know how people interpret about it. So, what most people or majority of what believe doesn't mean they are the truth.
Most of the videos from this channel reminds me of the hadeeds below
Narrated `Abdullah bin `Amr bin Al-`As:
I heard Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) saying, "Allah does not take away the knowledge, by taking it away from (the hearts of) the people, but takes it away by the death of the religious learned men till when none of the (religious learned men) remains, people will take as their leaders ignorant persons who when consulted will give their verdict without knowledge. So they will go astray and will lead the people astray."
Vol. 1, Book 3, Hadith 100
Do you have a proper argument or are you this upset over womens clothing? How about you stop your countrys men from harassing women for once?
So u can't find an actual way to criticise the facts he's giving so ur accusing him of being wrong 😂😂 this hadith is clearly talking about the sheikhs who impose this crazy idea of hijab on women that's who this is talking about
So, we there is the Quran (final Authority, I hope?), then the Hadees followed by the commentary. I am neither of the Arab origin nor do I know Arabic, but I have read some "experts" say that Arabic is one of the hardest language to translate. Fact of the matter is most all languages are hard to translate because there is no way to translate nuances and essential element of communication. So that's the first problem, the second problem is the hadees. Islam never undertook a process of corroboration or certification of hadees these days the new age televangelists (low on scholarship and driven more by profit and notoriety) in Pakistan come with a new hadees as their hearts desire and to prove their point. Plus do not forget that a lot of this is word of mouth without the benefit of written records. Heck, the prophets biography was written what a good 75 years after he passed away. The third issue is with the commentary. Commentary is just that; a commentary an opinion. Some commentaries are closer to the facts being commented on and others well can be wild tangents going all over the place. Religion remains the opium of the masses but for some of us who have broken the chains its a more peaceful world.