I recently got a purple one with gold on purple page edges. It is breathtaking. It looks like something that would be used by royalty. The only problem is that it's almost too nice to use. I'm afraid of damaging it, so I end up using my regular down to earth Bibles!
the best thing you can do for the bible is use it, the oils on your hands will help protect the leather, enjoy your bible no good in a box, bless you brother
WOW that is one beautiful Bible! The cyclopedic concordance is what made me want to buy one of these but I could not justify the cost when I have a long primer already but it is sure a beauty! Very nice! So glad you got to check it out and share it with us.
Very nice Bible I've never had a long primer I heard they're really really nice. That Oxford looks cool too is that a real old one? Great review as always God bless you
I think they are still a hit and miss, I guess you get that when you are buying a hand made bible, but this one does look like they are getting better. Thanks for your support bless you.
Nice Bibles but I just can't give my money to someone who prints and profits off the modern perversions [2 John 1:10-11 KJV], I don't care how nice they are. I am so glad for places like CBP, LCBP, and BPS. Thank you for the review sister! God bless you!
@@Rob-lu2ns I was not making a stand for the Scofield or the Thompson chain, I stand for the Received Text underlying the KJV. The problem is with the underlying manuscripts that are the basis for all modern perversions, vaticanus and sinaiticus. They are corrupt.... I have made comments on my channel about both of those study Bibles and the notes of any study Bible are given by man and are not inspired. The comment that I made was in reference to the King James Bible, not a specific study Bible. I went to your channel to see if you had any content and as usual when someone is attacking me on TH-cam they have zero content. The only video you have is of an ungodly video game with someone getting killed. [1 John 2:15-17 KJV] It is astounding that those who say you shouldn't attack others......that is all they themselves ever do. If you wanna know where I stand I have laid it out plain as day on my channel. If you don't agree with any of it that is your prerogative. I am not the truth but God's Word is, that is the standard. I do not speak on something that I have not studied out for myself. God called me to be a preacher of the gospel and to declare the truth and that is simply what I do my friend.
@@Rob-lu2nsOnce again the Scofield and Thompson chain notes are not inspired and that is not what I am saying. It is the King James Bible and the underlying text. I see what you are saying but I am not talking about the study Bibles I am talking about printing versions other than the KJV. And by the way, with your snide comment, "if you're going to try to be so righteous..." you make it sound like it is wrong to stand for the truth because it may make someone feel uncomfortable but that is nonsense and not Biblical. The nonjudgemental approach is the weak-kneed new evangelical ecumenical "christianity" that waters down the gospel and tickles the ears of those who have turned from the truth. [1 Thessalonians 5:21 KJV; Ephesians 5:11 KJV] I have no desire to fight with you and I do not see our conversation as such. I am just defending my statements and expounding upon them. Hope you have a good day.
@@Rob-lu2ns ...yeah but you just couldn't scroll past my comment.......you had to hurl an accusation at me for "wresting the scriptures" which is untrue and ridiculous. I didn't say anything about any doctrine or passage of Scripture. I was simply saying I wouldn't give my money to publishers who did not exclusively print and sell the KJV only. You are the one who attacked me I was just explaining myself.
@@Rob-lu2ns "You that know that those bridge Bibles were the start of the modern versions right?" False....the Scofield was first published in 1909 and the Thompson Chain in 1908. The first English revision using the Alexandrian manuscripts Sinaiticus and Vaticanus was the ERV in England in 1885. Then followed by the ASV in America in 1900...The true beginnings of the modern perversions was in the garden of Eden with the serpent [Genesis 3:1 KJV] Using the Bible and its teachings to live by is not wresting the Scripture it is following the mandate of the Lord Jesus Christ [Matthew 4:4 KJV] I willingly admit all the time that I am not wise, I have no wisdom within myself that is why I look to God's Word and to the best of my ability try to pattern my life after it. I try to line myself up to it and not the other way around. I am saved, born again, and washed in His precious blood. I have His righteousness for without Jesus I have none. If that makes me a fool in your eyes, so be it. You can attack me all you want it doesn't bother me my friend. I get these type of attacks often when I stand for the KJV and they are always from so called "christians." Let me ask you this....do you use the modern perversions or do you hold to the KJV? you are asking for consistency.....I am being consistent. I am standing for the received text basis for the KJV and against the modern perversions based on the Alexandrian manuscripts. I am not standing for Thompson or Scofield....The NOTES have ZERO to do with it. If I stand for the KJV and own a Scofield or a Thompson you can glean notes and disregard the times they correct the KJV in the notes because I know that is is not right. The notes are of MEN not inspired by GOD, how hard is that for you to grasp???? I don't think any of us will fully agree with all the notes in a study Bible. I am talking about RL Allan printing the modern versions and I wont give them my money because I would be partaking of their evil deeds of printing corrupt Bibles, good grief why is that so hard to comprehend forget the study Bible notes that is irrelevant. I warn people about the notes in study Bibles and how even some good ones like the Scofield have marginally notes that correct the KJV and that they should be disregarded. We can glean from other men even though they may not have had everything right. None of us do. You are saying that if I own or buy a Scofield or Thompson chain I am lining up with the modern version crowd which is nonsense. Or that CBP and LCBP sell the Scofield and Thompson that they are as well and it is not logically consistent. It is not capitulation to the modern versions to own a Bible that has notes in it that question the KJV text. You simply disregard them! If you feel that is so then you do not have to buy one or own one but CBP and LCBP plainly state that they are a KJV only ministry. RL Allan is not. ...that is how simple it is. Talk about swallowing a camel and straining at a gnat....the vain jangling is coming from you because you cannot get it that I am not talking about the NOTES....yes they have notes that question the KJV but they are notes not Scripture, I am referring to Scripture.
![[LIVE] : ONE ลุมพินี 82 วันนี้!! คู่เอก | ยอดไอคิว vs อับดัลลาห์](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/hSsyTl_9bqs/mqdefault.jpg)
Lol. A hundred years. Every thing will be long gone before that.
I recently got a purple one with gold on purple page edges. It is breathtaking. It looks like something that would be used by royalty. The only problem is that it's almost too nice to use. I'm afraid of damaging it, so I end up using my regular down to earth Bibles!
the best thing you can do for the bible is use it, the oils on your hands will help protect the leather, enjoy your bible no good in a box, bless you brother
WOW that is one beautiful Bible! The cyclopedic concordance is what made me want to buy one of these but I could not justify the cost when I have a long primer already but it is sure a beauty! Very nice! So glad you got to check it out and share it with us.
I was blown away by how nice it is, thanks for your comment bless you.
Very helpful review! Beautiful Bible!
they sure know how to make them, thanks for your support, bless you.
Amazing video. Thanks, was looking for a good review for the 53c.
im glad you enjoyed it, the helps at the end are awesome and a lot easier to read than the smaller bibles that have this in them.
Beautiful bible! Love that huge section of helps and concordance! It would be great if a new bible had all that in it. Thanks for sharing it with us!
it is a beautiful bible, and if you had this one you wouldn't need a study bible as well, bless you and thanks for your support
Very nice Bible I've never had a long primer I heard they're really really nice. That Oxford looks cool too is that a real old one? Great review as always God bless you
thanks for commenting, it is nice, they wanted me to write there name in it, so I did it the old English writing, bless you
Nice Bible, not got an Allan, not sure if I ever will but I do like the look of the old Oxford Cyclopedic concordance!
Cyclopedic concordance is nice, full of information, they truly are a peace of art work these bibles, thanks for your support. Bless you.
Great review, thank you! Would you say Charfleet has been getting better since they made your red ESV? Blessings
I think they are still a hit and miss, I guess you get that when you are buying a hand made bible, but this one does look like they are getting better. Thanks for your support bless you.
They don't make them in red letter : -//
Shanni AV1611KJB all there KJV bibles will be black letter, thanks for your support God Bless
Nice Bibles but I just can't give my money to someone who prints and profits off the modern perversions [2 John 1:10-11 KJV], I don't care how nice they are. I am so glad for places like CBP, LCBP, and BPS. Thank you for the review sister! God bless you!
@@Rob-lu2ns They don't print the RV, they only print the KJV. How am I wresting the Scriptures by standing for the Scriptures?
@@Rob-lu2ns I was not making a stand for the Scofield or the Thompson chain, I stand for the Received Text underlying the KJV. The problem is with the underlying manuscripts that are the basis for all modern perversions, vaticanus and sinaiticus. They are corrupt.... I have made comments on my channel about both of those study Bibles and the notes of any study Bible are given by man and are not inspired. The comment that I made was in reference to the King James Bible, not a specific study Bible. I went to your channel to see if you had any content and as usual when someone is attacking me on TH-cam they have zero content. The only video you have is of an ungodly video game with someone getting killed. [1 John 2:15-17 KJV] It is astounding that those who say you shouldn't attack others......that is all they themselves ever do. If you wanna know where I stand I have laid it out plain as day on my channel. If you don't agree with any of it that is your prerogative. I am not the truth but God's Word is, that is the standard. I do not speak on something that I have not studied out for myself. God called me to be a preacher of the gospel and to declare the truth and that is simply what I do my friend.
@@Rob-lu2nsOnce again the Scofield and Thompson chain notes are not inspired and that is not what I am saying. It is the King James Bible and the underlying text. I see what you are saying but I am not talking about the study Bibles I am talking about printing versions other than the KJV. And by the way, with your snide comment, "if you're going to try to be so righteous..." you make it sound like it is wrong to stand for the truth because it may make someone feel uncomfortable but that is nonsense and not Biblical. The nonjudgemental approach is the weak-kneed new evangelical ecumenical "christianity" that waters down the gospel and tickles the ears of those who have turned from the truth. [1 Thessalonians 5:21 KJV; Ephesians 5:11 KJV] I have no desire to fight with you and I do not see our conversation as such. I am just defending my statements and expounding upon them. Hope you have a good day.
@@Rob-lu2ns ...yeah but you just couldn't scroll past my comment.......you had to hurl an accusation at me for "wresting the scriptures" which is untrue and ridiculous. I didn't say anything about any doctrine or passage of Scripture. I was simply saying I wouldn't give my money to publishers who did not exclusively print and sell the KJV only. You are the one who attacked me I was just explaining myself.
@@Rob-lu2ns "You that know that those bridge Bibles were the start of the modern versions right?" False....the Scofield was first published in 1909 and the Thompson Chain in 1908. The first English revision using the Alexandrian manuscripts Sinaiticus and Vaticanus was the ERV in England in 1885. Then followed by the ASV in America in 1900...The true beginnings of the modern perversions was in the garden of Eden with the serpent [Genesis 3:1 KJV]
Using the Bible and its teachings to live by is not wresting the Scripture it is following the mandate of the Lord Jesus Christ [Matthew 4:4 KJV] I willingly admit all the time that I am not wise, I have no wisdom within myself that is why I look to God's Word and to the best of my ability try to pattern my life after it. I try to line myself up to it and not the other way around. I am saved, born again, and washed in His precious blood. I have His righteousness for without Jesus I have none. If that makes me a fool in your eyes, so be it. You can attack me all you want it doesn't bother me my friend. I get these type of attacks often when I stand for the KJV and they are always from so called "christians."
Let me ask you this....do you use the modern perversions or do you hold to the KJV?
you are asking for consistency.....I am being consistent. I am standing for the received text basis for the KJV and against the modern perversions based on the Alexandrian manuscripts. I am not standing for Thompson or Scofield....The NOTES have ZERO to do with it. If I stand for the KJV and own a Scofield or a Thompson you can glean notes and disregard the times they correct the KJV in the notes because I know that is is not right. The notes are of MEN not inspired by GOD, how hard is that for you to grasp???? I don't think any of us will fully agree with all the notes in a study Bible.
I am talking about RL Allan printing the modern versions and I wont give them my money because I would be partaking of their evil deeds of printing corrupt Bibles, good grief why is that so hard to comprehend forget the study Bible notes that is irrelevant. I warn people about the notes in study Bibles and how even some good ones like the Scofield have marginally notes that correct the KJV and that they should be disregarded.
We can glean from other men even though they may not have had everything right. None of us do. You are saying that if I own or buy a Scofield or Thompson chain I am lining up with the modern version crowd which is nonsense. Or that CBP and LCBP sell the Scofield and Thompson that they are as well and it is not logically consistent. It is not capitulation to the modern versions to own a Bible that has notes in it that question the KJV text. You simply disregard them! If you feel that is so then you do not have to buy one or own one but CBP and LCBP plainly state that they are a KJV only ministry. RL Allan is not. ...that is how simple it is. Talk about swallowing a camel and straining at a gnat....the vain jangling is coming from you because you cannot get it that I am not talking about the NOTES....yes they have notes that question the KJV but they are notes not Scripture, I am referring to Scripture.
Those are nice but out of my range, I can’t justify paying too much for a Bible. 🙂
same