Man I cannot believe you did not mention the ultimate lens for the RF system... the 28-70 F2... Hands down the absolute best lens I have ever used. It is heavy as hell and expensive AF. But it is the most versatile lens I have ever used. The quality is insane and it is like having 3 primes in one. I highly recommend that you try it !
Hey man. I rented it and loved it. But like you say it’s a very particular lens, heavy, expensive. I prefer the 24-70 f2.8 more manageable also sharp as hell, lighter and easy to carry around when choosing only one lens.
Versatile? Don t agree… in vidéo not so good… af braithing…heavy no IS, no 24mm. Only one more stop aperture. Not a good deal and the difference in sharpness with the 2470 is very weak.
I'll also add that for video the 28-70mm f/2 lens has louder autofocus than the 24-70 f/2.8 lens. The 28-70mm is great at photographs, but I wouldn't call it the most versatile in this mixed media environment.
because there are people with different needs. I've been thankful to own a few and provide viewers with my personal feedback. If you are a portrait photographer, I talked about a few, if you are a logger, I also talked about a couple that may suit, if you want to get one or two I also talked about those at the end...
Generally, to be all round you need three focal lengths. 15-35mm, 24-70mm and 70-200mm. Th is covers most of your needs regardless of what you do. Generally you also need a prime lens, like 50mm but 85mm is often best. I can see why he previewed all of them. You could get 24-70mm or 28-70mm or 24-105mm and they all cover the same focal range but the price difference is huge. Your budget determines a lot
The new teleconverters won’t work with the 70-200. The rear glass of that lens, and most RF lenses, is too close to the mount. The new teleconverters only work with the new F/11 primes and the new 100-500. This is official, per Canon.
I preordered the R6 and I think I’m just going to get the RF 28-70 f2. I shoot on a super old T3i with only 28mm and 50mm primes - which are around 50mm and 84mm when multiplied by the crop factor. I film my woodworking and also take my finished furniture photos all with those primes, so an R6 with an incredible RF lens will be a wonderful upgrade. Down the line I think I also want the 85mm 😬
I actually ordered it after so much feedback from y’all. I stroke a deal believe it or not www.willoughbys.com/Canon_RF_28-70mm_f_2L_USM_Lens_346838.html?refid=MGoogle
Great coverage. I did pick up the 35mm for my R6 but sticking with my Canon EF lenses as you can almost double those prices in Australia. Just waiting for the adapter - sneaky trick by Canon as camera without a lens is useless. Probably hoping everyone would buy at least one RF lens.
Nice video bro. I’ve decided to buy rf70-200. Kinda struggle with the short length lens. Which lens do you think I should choose? Rf35 1.8 or 50 1.8? (I mainly take portraits and sight view pics)
You’re missing the best lens available for RF mount imo. The 28-70 f2.0 L. If you haven’t had a chance to play with this monster, do yourself a favor and rent it some time. It’s amazing, and literally the only example of this range with this speed I’ve ever seen or heard about.
I grabbed the RF 28-70 f/2 while Canon had the refurbished units on sale. It was priced less than the 24-70 f/2.8 new by $200. Still get the 1 year Canon warranty. Other than the weight it was a no-brainer. From all I have seen and heard it is one of Canon's best ever lenses. And paired with the R5 or R6, it is one of the lenses rated for 8 stops of stabilization even though the lens itself doesn't have IS.
If you have only money for picking one lens then the 24-70mm is the lens to go for. If canon looking for the 24-70mm mark ii I suggest add a macro in it.
Nice video. I’m getting an R5 and do mostly video, torn between the 15-35 2.8 and 24-70 2.8. I’m mostly shooting indoors, in some small room situations, possibly interviews but also filmmaking everywhere. Do you think the 15-35mm will cover enough for all of that and be a flattering focal length? Thanks
Yes! Thank you for doing lens videos! I know I will get the R6 but I am really struggling on what lens or lenses I will treat myself with without going way over budget. I have the EF 24-105 1:4 L IS USM that I paired with a rented EOS R this weekend for a wedding. I was so disappointed in the AF to the point where I worry if something is wrong with my lens. I'm not sure if I should get the RF version, or a different RF lense. Or use my EF mount for awhile to see what Canon will be putting out in the next couple years. I would like to have wide available if needed, but also really want a zoom lense. Decisions decisions.
Hey man. Thank you for your comment. The 24-105 is fast at focusing. The EF version is fast from I used to own it so maybe something with your focusing setting or lens itself. I’ll be dropping son in-depth lens reviews for each lens I mentioned here.
Thanks for the review, I purchased the 70-200 RF because of this review (in part); i love it, thanks. However, note that the teleconverters do not work with that lens as you noted in 13:35. I accidentally purchased the 2x and the extended component does not fit, even if you lock out at full zoom 200m. You may want to revise that portion of the video with a correction. But still great video, thanks for taking the time.
Glad the video helped man. I made the same mistake and realized it when I needed to use it a few months after. I will make an update video. If TH-cam didn’t remove the feature to add text to a video….
I love R, R5, R3... 📸 The major problem is huge price for all. Now Only I can afford is R. With 15-35mm 35mm, 85mm 24-70mm To cover wedding and other functions For both photo and video.
It’s true but when comparing it with a Sony 85 f1.4 and the canon EF both are f8 you can’t tell the difference. The canon RF is faster are focusing than the Sony I think. Less hunting. I own both but my favorite lens of all times is the Sony 85mm f1.8 from light, fast, affordable
Gaston Yes, but I didn’t buy the RF 85 1.2 to shoot at F8. I have only shoot with it at 1.2. For me this is what the lens is about: A wonderful portrait lens with silky smooth bokeh.
Dear, sir, I wish to bring you a very big THANK, for your excellent, and for me very needful and helpful guiding which lenses for the new RF setup I need to begin with! I so much appreciated your concise and informative presentation of the new lens setup from Canon! Wishing you both safe and healthy days and many many perfect portrait shoots with your new lens choices! All the best wishes from Sweden! PS. Thumbs up and now also a thankful subscriber to your channel!
Like I mentioned in the beginning disclaimer: I have reviews for each lens with sample footage coming up. I have also done reviews on the channel of some of them.
This is the problem whenever a new system comes out.....but its a good problem to have. I have the 35mm f1.2, 24-105mm f4, 70-200mm f2.8 and the 2x teleconverter on order.....THEN I read that the extender won't work with any of these lenses so I ordered the 100-500mm that I was planning on getting eventually anyways to save me the hassle of sending back a teleconverter....crazy!. Glad to see I'm not the only one who fell for Canon making the 70-200mm incompatible with the teleconverter! Oh well, I think I will manage to forgive them.
No mention of the 28-70mm f/2? I'm surprised! Everybody says it's the best lens Canon has ever made. You mentioned low light shooting a few times in this video, too, and the f/2 aperture is great for that. For me it was a no brainer to replace the 24-70mm.
Gaston thanks for the info about the lenses but one thing that I always need to know as a hybrid shooter is just how much lenses focus breath. Most reviews that mention it that I have seen on almost all the RF glass show quite bad focus breathing that is unfortunate as these lenses for stills are excellent! 🙏🏾
In my opinion, it’s a great lens if you want to have one lens rather than several primes to cover that range. But in my opinion I prefer the 24-70 f2.8 and get super fast primes like the 85 and 50f1.2. The 28-70mm f2 is expensive but it will be more expensive getting a bunch of primes. It’s also heavy to log around. If you want it go for it, you won’t regret the quality. I have affiliate links right here in the description with several RF Lens options
I just shelled out 6.5 grand on Canon R6 and a 28-70mm f2 L series. Hope they don't disappoint. I'd never spent this much in one day. Funny thing is I'm just starting out. 😆
Great lens. Rented it and liked it but I prefer the lighter weight 24/70 f2.8 and get primes for my portraits with faster aperture. Also because of the Light weight, the 24-70 makes it more manageable for traveling. But again it's a great lens, just not my cup of tea.
Gaston Shutters That’s good to know. I’m transitioning to from the 5D Mark IV to the R5. As an event and portrait photographer I thought the 28-70mm 2.0 would be a no brainer. As someone who has always lugged around a heavy camera bag I’m looking to make my load a lot lighter. I’ll take your word for it but my curiosity is telling me to rent the 28-70mm 2.0 before I make my final decision. Thanks again for your insight.
I think RF Extenders will not work with those lenses you mentioned. Canon Note : This extender is only compatible with the following RF lenses RF600mm F11 IS STM, RF800mm F11 IS STM, RF100-500mm F4.5-7.1 L IS USM. Use is not accessible with previous RF lenses.
I saw that after someone mentioned it where. Super bummer! These extenders from Sony work just fine on my Gmaster 70-200 so I assumed Canon would not cripple it like this!
Will these lenses be compatible with the future camera that canon comes out with? Sorry I am novice and unfamiliar with just getting into the photography space. From what I understand, the RF lenses are the new tech for canons full frame cameras but the current bodies like the EOSR are behind the curve. So will these lenses be compatible with future products? Because I just got an EOS R but in case I ever want to upgrade to a better canon body I just want to be sure that the purchase of any of these expensive lenses will still be of value to me in the even that I upgrade to a better body. Thanks!
I’m a video guy and I’m thinking about picking up the 15-35 and 70-200 lenses. Think these would be good combo? The 24-70 f2 looks solid too, but I’m not sure...
I have ordered the R5 and an EF adapter, but for my first RF lens I can't decide between the 28-70 L f2 and the 50mm L prime. I already have the EF 24-70L2.8 and 70-300L.
Incredible lens and pretty manageable. Addicting lens. But remember it doesn’t have IS. The upcoming 50 F2 has IS and macro capabilities. Something to think about it because with the R5 and R6 you get up to 8 stops. Now I don’t know how true is the 8 stop claim...
You’re right, the RF70-200 is a great lens, especially for video - fantastic stabilization. Great to travel with, too. I would love to see an RF 24 prime. The EF 24 1.4 adapts well, but it’s just so big, and the 24 2.8 is is ok, but it’s too loud for video.
Hello, is it true, that using Canon R6 with his 20 Mpx sensor will restrict the high resolution of RF lenses? I read that they are capable of even 100 Mpx. Than it would be better to choose R5 with his 45 Mpx. Of course I will not print big pictures but I thought that maybe after zooming in you will still have much more detail as while using R6?
Very useful comparison! Just what I was looking for. Thanks. I have some insights on the R5 in my vid the other day and also found some concerns on the IBIS vs the Lens IS that you might find it useful. Cheers
How good is the the low light performance and DOF on the f/4 of the 24-105? I’m trying to figure out the best 1-2 lenses to purchase for a portable travel kit (preordered R5’s) for landscapes, night time city, lifestyle portraits, night skies, and general travel. Wondering if I should get a 24-105 + 50, 24-105 + 35, 24-105 + 15-35, or if I could just survive with a 24-70 on it’s own. Will the f/2.8 be good enough for low light, night time, and interiors? I shoot hybrid, both photos and videos, with photos taking slight priority.
Welcome to the channel Will. Tough call here. I would get he 24-105 f4 for travel and everything else if your budget is around 1k. No if you can spend a bit more I’ll go for the 24-70 f2 and get the 35 f1.8 and 50 mm f1.8 when it comes out. You could easily survive on one lens. If you don’t need super wife or super telephoto capabilities. The 13-35mm f2.8 is crear for cityscape architectural... very tough to decisions but that would be my recommendation.
I use the RF 24-105 f4 for travel, with my EOS RP. I find the low light performance and DOF very satisfactory. I find that I use the zoom range 70-105 a lot. The RF 24-70 f2.8 lacks this very useful part of the range, so for travel I would not buy the RF 24-70 f2.8. I usually have to save weight when I travel, so I go with just the RF 24-105 f4. I love image quality from this lens. If I could bring one more lens, it would be the RF 50 f1.2 or the RF 70-200 f2.8. But almost every time I pack my travel bag, I leave my 50 and 70-200 at home, to save weight, and to avoid changing lenses.
I have both 24-70 RF 2.8 and 24- 105 RF. For travel I bring the 24-105. It’s an L lens so it’s weather sealed. I also bring the 35mm RF 1.8 for nighttime speed and interiors. The combo works well for me.
If I could bring only one lens it would be the 24-70/2.8 for its versatility. 2 lenses? 15-35/2.8 and the 50/1.2. And 3 lenses? add the 70-200/2.8. I traveled to Europe last summer with the R and I had the RF 30, EF 50/1.2, EF 16-35/2.8, EF 100-400. I used all of them and wished I had also brought the 11-24/4 L.
Faster aperture in the prime. Blurrier background. Better for video in certain situations. But if shallowest depth of field is not an issue go with the Zoom f2.8
After so many great feedback from users here I decided to pull the trigger and bought one for $2300 brand new! (From 3000) I’ll be testing the lens and comparing it soon.
Peak Design. Wrist strap on my A6600 and hand strap on my A7RIV. www.peakdesign.com/products/slide?variant=9737366896684¤cy=USD&gclid=Cj0KCQjw6uT4BRD5ARIsADwJQ1-0ocHx90rRKuWhNyKh5s1SXrEUIg1PFSRzIB1Zw-3vRWDOBfqTXp4aAi15EALw_wcB
I am struggling to chose between the 24-105 and the 28-70. I really really like to shoot at very low f numbers, so I‘m not sure about my main lens starting at f4. But it’s so much more affordable! If I get that one I save a lot of money and could go for a portrait prime lens next (I shoot weddings, events and portraits) if I chose the 28-70 I am broke basically but have exactly what I want... might have to try out both myself before choosing one.
Get the 24-70 f2.8. It’s wider than the 28-70 and faster than the 24-105. Also cheaper than the 28-70 but doble the price of the 24-105. The 24-70 is one of my fav zoom lenses. You can check some images shot with it on my instagram.com/gastonshutters
Where I'm from, the 24-70 and 28-70 are almost identical in price. Honestly just get the 28-70, since you're spending a significant amount of money anyway. Do it once, and do it right!
I just subscribed because you made this video 😎.. I just pre-ordered my R5 and I'm still keeping my EOS R, it will always be my favorite camera 😁. Still collecting RF glass.. 15-35 f2.8 or the 70-200 f2.8 are the lenses im back and forth on which to get first.. I have the 28-70 f2, 24-105 f4 so far. Excited to see how they work on the R5 🙂
Great lens. Rented it and liked it but I prefer the lighter weight 24/70 f2.8 and get primes for my portraits with faster aperture. Also because of the Light weight, the 24-70 makes it more manageable for traveling. But again it's a great lens, just not my cup of tea.
Gaston Shutters I was reading about the next trinity lenses 16-28 F2 L USM, and I got confuse the third lens can be 70-200 f2 or another new size, I miss a new rf 200-400 f4 with 1.4x extender or 100 or 135 mm macro. In rf road map, not news at the moment
I'd like to see a comparison between the 24-70 and the 28-70. Which is sharper and renders images better? I normally carry big 500 f/4 lenses around so when people talk about heavy i'm on the floor laughing. Also, it sure would be nice to see someone test EF glass on these bodies and provide comparisons to the similar RF glass. Exactly how much does one give up when using EF glass with an adapter?
I will tend the 28-70 again and do a comparison with images. The EF converter makes EF Glass Work natively at least that’s what canon says so it shouldn’t be any different and probably better taking in consideration these cameras having new sensors.
Depending your needs. The 24-70 is wide and telephoto. So if you are into portraiture, product photography, events. It’s the best option in my opinion. Ideally the combo of both makes it a solid pack of you can swing it
@@GastonShutters thank you , I am thinking of 15-35 and rf 50 combo for now , mainly for youtube videos , travel , portraits and product photography , you think it will good idea ??
Mr.M TechVideoContent hmmm. I’m on the fence because you get 24mm with the 24-70 not as wide as 15mm but you also get the 35mm rage, the 50mm range and the telefoto look at 70mm. If I was you I’d go for the 24-70mm + 50mm f1.2 or get the 15-35mm the 50mm and see if you can swing the 24-105 f4.
Great sharp fast glass. It may replace a few primes. But I went with the 24-70mm because of the wider focal length, smaller/ lighter body and a bit more affordable. The 28-79 may not be wide enough if you want to self shoot. But this are personal preferences.
@@GastonShutters The thing that gives you the amazing image quality is the thing that keeps the teleconverter from working - the proximity of the rear element to the back of the lens. I heard that the non-IS version of the 70-200 f/2.8 would support the converter, but that is a rumor at this point.
I have. Heavy expensive and not wide enough for me. I prefer the 24-70 f2.8. Lighter, wider and not much difference from f2 to 2.8. My main issue was the weight because these style of focal length I use it a lot one handed as I may be holding a reflector or even light with my other hand.
@@GastonShutters I see... I've used the main 24-70mm workhorse a lot too but considering getting the 28-70mm as it's the first of its kind. I think I'm drawn to the uniqueness of this lens. Great video by the way!
Nick Trieu thanks Nick. The 28-70 it’s a great lens nonetheless especially if you want to get that fast prime type of look in just one lens. Could be a great one lens for many types of photography. Especially portraits outdoor, environmental, and getting all that shallow seth of field at all lengths.
You mention the Canon 35mm being better than the Sony equivalent version but don’t actually state any real reasons why. As someone with both Canon and Sony gear a more in-depth comparison would be appreciated.
Hey man. Thank you for stopping by. Like I mentioned in the opening disclaimer on this video I have reviews per each lens coming up soon. I didn’t want this video to be two hours long so excuse if I omitted something. To answer your question. The reason why I like the 35RF Better than Sony is because of less CA, less distortion, way less vignetting, and better performance overall. The Sony May be a tad faster at focusing though but I find the canon way superior than the Sony version and I’m a Sony fanboy since 6 years! You can check some of my Sony lenses review here and also click on the cards that appear on this video for sample images of the 35mm in a BTS shoot I did. Consider subscribing so you don’t miss those in depth review I have coming up.
you say new lenses lets say 85mm f2 STM is coming which has more features and image stabalization than the expensive 85mm1.2f, but the main difference itself is the f point. thats why its expensive
Man I cannot believe you did not mention the ultimate lens for the RF system... the 28-70 F2... Hands down the absolute best lens I have ever used. It is heavy as hell and expensive AF. But it is the most versatile lens I have ever used. The quality is insane and it is like having 3 primes in one. I highly recommend that you try it !
Hey man. I rented it and loved it. But like you say it’s a very particular lens, heavy, expensive. I prefer the 24-70 f2.8 more manageable also sharp as hell, lighter and easy to carry around when choosing only one lens.
Versatile? Don t agree… in vidéo not so good… af braithing…heavy no IS, no 24mm. Only one more stop aperture. Not a good deal and the difference in sharpness with the 2470 is very weak.
I'll also add that for video the 28-70mm f/2 lens has louder autofocus than the 24-70 f/2.8 lens.
The 28-70mm is great at photographs, but I wouldn't call it the most versatile in this mixed media environment.
well, you suggested almost all the RF lenses available. Wonder how its a buying guide.
because there are people with different needs. I've been thankful to own a few and provide viewers with my personal feedback. If you are a portrait photographer, I talked about a few, if you are a logger, I also talked about a couple that may suit, if you want to get one or two I also talked about those at the end...
Generally, to be all round you need three focal lengths. 15-35mm, 24-70mm and 70-200mm. Th is covers most of your needs regardless of what you do. Generally you also need a prime lens, like 50mm but 85mm is often best.
I can see why he previewed all of them. You could get 24-70mm or 28-70mm or 24-105mm and they all cover the same focal range but the price difference is huge.
Your budget determines a lot
@@MaynardManyowa 🙏
How is it not a guide?
@@rcrinsea more of an encyclopedia
The new teleconverters won’t work with the 70-200. The rear glass of that lens, and most RF lenses, is too close to the mount. The new teleconverters only work with the new F/11 primes and the new 100-500. This is official, per Canon.
Yep I've learned that. what a bummer bot being able to convert a 70-200!
And it works well for the new 600mm and 800mm, but who wants to add teleconverters to dose lenses?
I am about to switch from Olympus to Canon and this video was Peeeeeeeeeerfect, thank-you.
Glad you like it
GREAT JOB I HAVE EOS R R5 AND R6 SUBBED!!
I preordered the R6 and I think I’m just going to get the RF 28-70 f2. I shoot on a super old T3i with only 28mm and 50mm primes - which are around 50mm and 84mm when multiplied by the crop factor. I film my woodworking and also take my finished furniture photos all with those primes, so an R6 with an incredible RF lens will be a wonderful upgrade. Down the line I think I also want the 85mm 😬
Great lens!! Expensive and heavy but great 👍
Nice one Shutters. The first RF lens I'd get is the 28-70 f2. That thing us a beast!
I actually ordered it after so much feedback from y’all. I stroke a deal believe it or not www.willoughbys.com/Canon_RF_28-70mm_f_2L_USM_Lens_346838.html?refid=MGoogle
@@GastonShutters Nice one! 👍
🙏
Great coverage. I did pick up the 35mm for my R6 but sticking with my Canon EF lenses as you can almost double those prices in Australia. Just waiting for the adapter - sneaky trick by Canon as camera without a lens is useless. Probably hoping everyone would buy at least one RF lens.
Nice video bro. I’ve decided to buy rf70-200. Kinda struggle with the short length lens. Which lens do you think I should choose? Rf35 1.8 or 50 1.8? (I mainly take portraits and sight view pics)
You’re missing the best lens available for RF mount imo. The 28-70 f2.0 L. If you haven’t had a chance to play with this monster, do yourself a favor and rent it some time. It’s amazing, and literally the only example of this range with this speed I’ve ever seen or heard about.
Yeah. I know, I rented it and liked it but I prefer the 24-70 and an 85 f1.2 with it.
I will do a side by side comparison if I rent it again.
I grabbed the RF 28-70 f/2 while Canon had the refurbished units on sale. It was priced less than the 24-70 f/2.8 new by $200. Still get the 1 year Canon warranty. Other than the weight it was a no-brainer. From all I have seen and heard it is one of Canon's best ever lenses. And paired with the R5 or R6, it is one of the lenses rated for 8 stops of stabilization even though the lens itself doesn't have IS.
super informative when i get my r6 i will be coming back to this video to pick out a lens
Hello, I’m your opinion, would Canon RF 85mm f/1.2 lens be working well for landscape shooting? Thanks.
If you don’t mind heavy lenses. It’s a great lens but I wouldn’t go with something like this lens. Probably a 24-70
I want the 85mm for portraits. Which 2 lens would you suggest to pair with that one to give me greater range of use?
If you have only money for picking one lens then the 24-70mm is the lens to go for. If canon looking for the 24-70mm mark ii I suggest add a macro in it.
Yep! 24-70 is the one
Nice video. I’m getting an R5 and do mostly video, torn between the 15-35 2.8 and 24-70 2.8. I’m mostly shooting indoors, in some small room situations, possibly interviews but also filmmaking everywhere. Do you think the 15-35mm will cover enough for all of that and be a flattering focal length? Thanks
24-70 is my choice
Excellent advice, appreciate the good points. Thanks
Glad you enjoy it
Yes! Thank you for doing lens videos! I know I will get the R6 but I am really struggling on what lens or lenses I will treat myself with without going way over budget. I have the EF 24-105 1:4 L IS USM that I paired with a rented EOS R this weekend for a wedding. I was so disappointed in the AF to the point where I worry if something is wrong with my lens. I'm not sure if I should get the RF version, or a different RF lense. Or use my EF mount for awhile to see what Canon will be putting out in the next couple years. I would like to have wide available if needed, but also really want a zoom lense. Decisions decisions.
Hey man. Thank you for your comment. The 24-105 is fast at focusing. The EF version is fast from I used to own it so maybe something with your focusing setting or lens itself. I’ll be dropping son in-depth lens reviews for each lens I mentioned here.
Will the Sigma 35mm 1.4 do well with Canon R6?
I love your all choices, Absolutely your selection perfect, personally don’t waste my money by purchasing cheap stuff
Thanks man !
Great video. I want to get the 70-200. What do you think of the durability of the extended barrel?
Get it with the amazon warranty and sleep well
I didn’t know you were also a photographer!! Which one you recommend for tattoo photos? I have a canon R and a 50mm
The R is a great photography camera. Yes the 50mm is versatile for tattoo photos.
And yes I’ve been doing photography for years now
Gaston, thanks so much for excellent and helpful video! Happy new subscriber here. 💛😎
Nice video I'm looking at getting the r5 and some glass but man the glass is a bit pricy lol. Would this be like the GM glass for Sony kinda?
Thanks for the review, I purchased the 70-200 RF because of this review (in part); i love it, thanks. However, note that the teleconverters do not work with that lens as you noted in 13:35. I accidentally purchased the 2x and the extended component does not fit, even if you lock out at full zoom 200m. You may want to revise that portion of the video with a correction. But still great video, thanks for taking the time.
Glad the video helped man. I made the same mistake and realized it when I needed to use it a few months after. I will make an update video. If TH-cam didn’t remove the feature to add text to a video….
I love R, R5, R3... 📸
The major problem is huge price for all.
Now Only I can afford is R. With 15-35mm 35mm, 85mm 24-70mm
To cover wedding and other functions
For both photo and video.
these glass still good on a rp?
can you share some picture quality difference all those lenses using R5 camera
50 1.2 & 24-105 both canon refurbished.
Only down side is the 50 1.2 is huge and it’s a big piece of glass to move. You feel it when it focuses.
yes because of the magnification/ focusing but for photo doesn't bother me at all.
The RF 85 1.2 is even bigger, but the quality you get out of this lens is just outstanding.
It’s true but when comparing it with a Sony 85 f1.4 and the canon EF both are f8 you can’t tell the difference. The canon RF is faster are focusing than the Sony I think. Less hunting. I own both but my favorite lens of all times is the Sony 85mm f1.8 from light, fast, affordable
Gaston Yes, but I didn’t buy the RF 85 1.2 to shoot at F8. I have only shoot with it at 1.2. For me this is what the lens is about: A wonderful portrait lens with silky smooth bokeh.
Yeah great bokeh and image quality. Heavy but good
Sheesh bro owns all the best RF lenses ever!!!! 💪🏾💪🏾💪🏾💪🏾📷📷
I needed them. Pulled the trigger and haven’t eaten a meal since then.
@@GastonShutters 🤣🤣🤣🤣 I believe it!!! Lol
BMB FILMS 😂
I own more lenses than this, so what? Also I bet this TH-camrs computer isn't good enough to edit 8K in real-time.
Dear, sir, I wish to bring you a very big THANK, for your excellent, and for me very needful and helpful guiding which lenses for the new RF setup I need to begin with! I so much appreciated your concise and informative presentation of the new lens setup from Canon! Wishing you both safe and healthy days and many many perfect portrait shoots with your new lens choices! All the best wishes from Sweden! PS. Thumbs up and now also a thankful subscriber to your channel!
Thank you so much for the support and I’m glad you found the content useful
taking a video/photo with each lens would have been a helpful bonus. Great video!
Like I mentioned in the beginning disclaimer: I have reviews for each lens with sample footage coming up. I have also done reviews on the channel of some of them.
This is the problem whenever a new system comes out.....but its a good problem to have. I have the 35mm f1.2, 24-105mm f4, 70-200mm f2.8 and the 2x teleconverter on order.....THEN I read that the extender won't work with any of these lenses so I ordered the 100-500mm that I was planning on getting eventually anyways to save me the hassle of sending back a teleconverter....crazy!. Glad to see I'm not the only one who fell for Canon making the 70-200mm incompatible with the teleconverter! Oh well, I think I will manage to forgive them.
You deserve a lot of likes .👍
You should put time stamps in your description!!! Thanks for the reviews
Good idea man!
No mention of the 28-70mm f/2? I'm surprised! Everybody says it's the best lens Canon has ever made. You mentioned low light shooting a few times in this video, too, and the f/2 aperture is great for that. For me it was a no brainer to replace the 24-70mm.
This was an overview regarding lenses I own. I don’t own that one
Gaston thanks for the info about the lenses but one thing that I always need to know as a hybrid shooter is just how much lenses focus breath. Most reviews that mention it that I have seen on almost all the RF glass show quite bad focus breathing that is unfortunate as these lenses for stills are excellent! 🙏🏾
I own the RF 35 macro and the sigma art 50mm 1.4. Sometimes i use the Ef 100mm macro
Great combo
The RF glass is amazing. I've got the 15-35 f2.8, 28-70 f2 and the 70-200 f2.8. They're all great.
nice choice
Nice collection... 🔥
Get a 100-500 to ride along, and you got a bang for the buck!
This is the setup I want, or--- I think I want. The alternative is to forego the 28-70 and get a 50mm 1.2 prime. I have the 24-105 f4.0 zoom.
Really great summary as I am looking at the lens lineup for the future.
Glad you enjoy it.
Hi Gaston, what's your view on 28-70mm f2 lens. Would you suggest it as first RF lens instead of 24-70 f2.8?
In my opinion, it’s a great lens if you want to have one lens rather than several primes to cover that range. But in my opinion I prefer the 24-70 f2.8 and get super fast primes like the 85 and 50f1.2. The 28-70mm f2 is expensive but it will be more expensive getting a bunch of primes. It’s also heavy to log around. If you want it go for it, you won’t regret the quality. I have affiliate links right here in the description with several RF Lens options
@@GastonShutters Thanks so much. Appreciated.
anytime.
I just shelled out 6.5 grand on Canon R6 and a 28-70mm f2 L series. Hope they don't disappoint. I'd never spent this much in one day. Funny thing is I'm just starting out. 😆
Where is the 28-70mm 2.0? Its one of the best lenses to come out in years. Its a game changer.
Great lens. Rented it and liked it but I prefer the lighter weight 24/70 f2.8 and get primes for my portraits with faster aperture. Also because of the Light weight, the 24-70 makes it more manageable for traveling. But again it's a great lens, just not my cup of tea.
Gaston Shutters That’s good to know. I’m transitioning to from the 5D Mark IV to the R5. As an event and portrait photographer I thought the 28-70mm 2.0 would be a no brainer. As someone who has always lugged around a heavy camera bag I’m looking to make my load a lot lighter. I’ll take your word for it but my curiosity is telling me to rent the 28-70mm 2.0 before I make my final decision. Thanks again for your insight.
I do real estate photo and video and preordered the R5 along with the 15-35.
Nice upload! Keep them coming!
Thank and will keep then coming. Consider subscribing so you don’t miss them
I think RF Extenders will not work with those lenses you mentioned.
Canon Note :
This extender is only compatible with the following RF lenses RF600mm F11 IS STM, RF800mm F11 IS STM, RF100-500mm F4.5-7.1 L IS USM. Use is not accessible with previous RF lenses.
I saw that after someone mentioned it where. Super bummer! These extenders from Sony work just fine on my Gmaster 70-200 so I assumed Canon would not cripple it like this!
Gaston Shutters even, I thought the same that all RF lenses would work with RF extenders.
Will these lenses be compatible with the future camera that canon comes out with? Sorry I am novice and unfamiliar with just getting into the photography space. From what I understand, the RF lenses are the new tech for canons full frame cameras but the current bodies like the EOSR are behind the curve. So will these lenses be compatible with future products? Because I just got an EOS R but in case I ever want to upgrade to a better canon body I just want to be sure that the purchase of any of these expensive lenses will still be of value to me in the even that I upgrade to a better body. Thanks!
Yes these are RF and will fit any RF camera. All good being new to this. We all were at one point.
Yes, probably for at least 30 years. The EF mount started out 33 years ago.
☝️
How is the noise under video AF for the RF lenses, compared to Sony?
The ones that are a bit noisy are the 35mm f1.8, 50mm f1.2 and the 85mm f1.2
The first lens i'd really reccomend and get is the 24-105 F4
Great lens and not too expensive
Yes. And the 50 1.2
Thanks for the video. I currently own only the kit lens 24-105 f4. I does very decent job. Can u also review other third party lenses
as of right now the only two third party lenses I've heard are MF 14mm f/2.8 and an MF 85mm f/1.4 from Samyang
Gaston Shutters new company called Venus laowa making rf mount lenses too
@@GastonShutters I would be interested in review of the Samyang 85mm
I’m a video guy and I’m thinking about picking up the 15-35 and 70-200 lenses. Think these would be good combo? The 24-70 f2 looks solid too, but I’m not sure...
I think you’ll be good. If you can pick up a 50mm f2 when it comes out. Good choices.
I bought two lenses the 24-105mm f4 and the 50mm f1.2 --so those two plus an R6 and R5 one for me and one for the wife. Let’s do it!
The things I would do for a 70-200
I have ordered the R5 and an EF adapter, but for my first RF lens I can't decide between the 28-70 L f2 and the 50mm L prime. I already have the EF 24-70L2.8 and 70-300L.
Go with the Prime man. You already have the 24-70 f2.8. The question is: is an additional f0.8 worth spending 3K in a very similar lens?
Gaston Shutters and the 28-70 is huggggggeeee
I didn’t want to be the one saying it 🤪
Man don’t try the 28-70 it’s Annoyingly large, wide and heavy.. i bought it for one day and returned to get the 85 1.2..
Yeah I rented it and I was like, “damn your girthy”
I have two lensen 24-120 f4-7.1. Stm and 50 mm f 1.8
Awesome!
I have the 15-35, 28-70 f/2 and the 70-200. The 28-70 covers so much , eliminating the need for primes in that range.
Good setup right there!
The holy Trinity I'm desperately pursuing!
Are you sure the 1.4 and 2x are compatible with the 70-200? The release said, they aren’t.
Are not. I believe it’s only for the big telephotos
I’ve been thinking about getting the 50mm for video as well as photos 🤔
Incredible lens and pretty manageable. Addicting lens. But remember it doesn’t have IS. The upcoming 50 F2 has IS and macro capabilities. Something to think about it because with the R5 and R6 you get up to 8 stops. Now I don’t know how true is the 8 stop claim...
Make sure you use a mic that isn't close to the focus motor. It is a bit loud, but beautiful image quality!
You’re right, the RF70-200 is a great lens, especially for video - fantastic stabilization. Great to travel with, too. I would love to see an RF 24 prime. The EF 24 1.4 adapts well, but it’s just so big, and the 24 2.8 is is ok, but it’s too loud for video.
There is a rumor of a 24mm. I think they’ll try to pul a 24mm f1.4! And I’m assuming it will be expensive.
Hello, is it true, that using Canon R6 with his 20 Mpx sensor will restrict the high resolution of RF lenses? I read that they are capable of even 100 Mpx. Than it would be better to choose R5 with his 45 Mpx. Of course I will not print big pictures but I thought that maybe after zooming in you will still have much more detail as while using R6?
You’ll get great images with an R6 If you print you won’t notice the difference.
You have all the best lens in the world. :-).
Thank you
Very useful comparison! Just what I was looking for. Thanks. I have some insights on the R5 in my vid the other day and also found some concerns on the IBIS vs the Lens IS that you might find it useful. Cheers
Glad you like it man! And thank you for the insight.
How good is the the low light performance and DOF on the f/4 of the 24-105? I’m trying to figure out the best 1-2 lenses to purchase for a portable travel kit (preordered R5’s) for landscapes, night time city, lifestyle portraits, night skies, and general travel. Wondering if I should get a 24-105 + 50, 24-105 + 35, 24-105 + 15-35, or if I could just survive with a 24-70 on it’s own. Will the f/2.8 be good enough for low light, night time, and interiors? I shoot hybrid, both photos and videos, with photos taking slight priority.
Welcome to the channel Will.
Tough call here. I would get he 24-105 f4 for travel and everything else if your budget is around 1k. No if you can spend a bit more I’ll go for the 24-70 f2 and get the 35 f1.8 and 50 mm f1.8 when it comes out. You could easily survive on one lens. If you don’t need super wife or super telephoto capabilities. The 13-35mm f2.8 is crear for cityscape architectural... very tough to decisions but that would be my recommendation.
I use the RF 24-105 f4 for travel, with my EOS RP. I find the low light performance and DOF very satisfactory. I find that I use the zoom range 70-105 a lot. The RF 24-70 f2.8 lacks this very useful part of the range, so for travel I would not buy the RF 24-70 f2.8. I usually have to save weight when I travel, so I go with just the RF 24-105 f4. I love image quality from this lens. If I could bring one more lens, it would be the RF 50 f1.2 or the RF 70-200 f2.8. But almost every time I pack my travel bag, I leave my 50 and 70-200 at home, to save weight, and to avoid changing lenses.
daghenrik the 24-105 is a great travel lens and the only lens to bring!
I have both 24-70 RF 2.8 and 24- 105 RF. For travel I bring the 24-105. It’s an L lens so it’s weather sealed. I also bring the 35mm RF 1.8 for nighttime speed and interiors. The combo works well for me.
If I could bring only one lens it would be the 24-70/2.8 for its versatility. 2 lenses? 15-35/2.8 and the 50/1.2. And 3 lenses? add the 70-200/2.8. I traveled to Europe last summer with the R and I had the RF 30, EF 50/1.2, EF 16-35/2.8, EF 100-400. I used all of them and wished I had also brought the 11-24/4 L.
Could you help me to answer - why we should buy 35, 50 lenses if you recomend 24-70 lense later? This is the main question i surf the internet
Faster aperture in the prime. Blurrier background. Better for video in certain situations. But if shallowest depth of field is not an issue go with the Zoom f2.8
I was thinking of either getting that 35mm and/or the 24-105. I'd like to get that 25-70 but that costs more than both of those lenses put together.
Your choice is pretty smart. The 24-70 is just faster. Other than that both great lenses
Gaston Shutters Yeah the 24-70 is clearly going to be superior. Maybe if I can land some more paying gigs I’ll save up and upgrade over some time.
wouuld you choose the 28-70 instead of the 24-70?
After so many great feedback from users here I decided to pull the trigger and bought one for $2300 brand new! (From 3000) I’ll be testing the lens and comparing it soon.
Just the 35 f1.8
Little powerful lens
Wonderful and very informative review, thank you very much!
Thank you. Very much appreciated. Consider subscribing for more content.
Just a note that the Canon RF 70-200mm 2.8L does NOT support the new Canon RF 2× Extender and Canon RF 1.4× Extender
Came here to say this. Basic fact checking.
RF glass are excellent. I’ve got the 50 F1.2, 85 F1.8, 28-70 F2, 70-200 f2.8, 15-35 F2.8, 100-500 telezoom
They are good but Jesse they are expensive
What kind of camera hand strap are you using?
Peak Design. Wrist strap on my A6600 and hand strap on my A7RIV. www.peakdesign.com/products/slide?variant=9737366896684¤cy=USD&gclid=Cj0KCQjw6uT4BRD5ARIsADwJQ1-0ocHx90rRKuWhNyKh5s1SXrEUIg1PFSRzIB1Zw-3vRWDOBfqTXp4aAi15EALw_wcB
I swear by the 28-70 2.0 lens to replace a 24, 35 & 50mm. However I also swear by having the RF 85 1.2 DS
What’s another budget friendly option for a 15-35mm lens type that you can recommend ?
Tampon 20-40mm
When you use an EF lens do you lose megapixels?
You don’t
70-200 is a monster lens. One of my favorite.
what about rf 28-70 f2 for filmmaker as well as photographer?
I am struggling to chose between the 24-105 and the 28-70. I really really like to shoot at very low f numbers, so I‘m not sure about my main lens starting at f4. But it’s so much more affordable! If I get that one I save a lot of money and could go for a portrait prime lens next (I shoot weddings, events and portraits) if I chose the 28-70 I am broke basically but have exactly what I want... might have to try out both myself before choosing one.
Get the 24-70 f2.8. It’s wider than the 28-70 and faster than the 24-105. Also cheaper than the 28-70 but doble the price of the 24-105. The 24-70 is one of my fav zoom lenses. You can check some images shot with it on my instagram.com/gastonshutters
I actually skip the 24-70 and just get the 15-35 2.8 and the 70-200 2.8 with the 50 1.2 in the middle as I hardly use my zooms between 35mm and 70mm.
Where I'm from, the 24-70 and 28-70 are almost identical in price. Honestly just get the 28-70, since you're spending a significant amount of money anyway. Do it once, and do it right!
I just subscribed because you made this video 😎.. I just pre-ordered my R5 and I'm still keeping my EOS R, it will always be my favorite camera 😁. Still collecting RF glass.. 15-35 f2.8 or the 70-200 f2.8 are the lenses im back and forth on which to get first.. I have the 28-70 f2, 24-105 f4 so far. Excited to see how they work on the R5 🙂
Wooohoooo the EOS R is still a great camera for photo! Def better than the R6 on paper. (When It comes to photo)
Thank you for the sub and I look forward to sharing photo talk with you
Hi there Any rough idea on release of that bew 50mm 1.8 please?
So suit for me to plan buy my first RF lense
Hi Gaston, what about the RF 28-70 F2 USM, also I hear they are going to make like tri
Great lens. Rented it and liked it but I prefer the lighter weight 24/70 f2.8 and get primes for my portraits with faster aperture. Also because of the Light weight, the 24-70 makes it more manageable for traveling. But again it's a great lens, just not my cup of tea.
Gaston Shutters I was reading about the next trinity lenses 16-28 F2 L USM, and I got confuse the third lens can be 70-200 f2 or another new size, I miss a new rf 200-400 f4 with 1.4x extender or 100 or 135 mm macro. In rf road map, not news at the moment
I'd like to see a comparison between the 24-70 and the 28-70. Which is sharper and renders images better? I normally carry big 500 f/4 lenses around so when people talk about heavy i'm on the floor laughing.
Also, it sure would be nice to see someone test EF glass on these bodies and provide comparisons to the similar RF glass. Exactly how much does one give up when using EF glass with an adapter?
I will tend the 28-70 again and do a comparison with images. The EF converter makes EF Glass Work natively at least that’s what canon says so it shouldn’t be any different and probably better taking in consideration these cameras having new sensors.
Gaston Shutters Thanks. Will be standing by.
Anthony Martin make sure to sub so you don’t miss it.
Everything looks good through an 85mm, crazy good lense
Agreed
''This 2299 lens is great! If you want something even cheaper...''
me: moving on.
Great video , I wanted to ask you for videos would you suggest 15-35 rf or 24-70 rf lens ??
Depending your needs. The 24-70 is wide and telephoto. So if you are into portraiture, product photography, events. It’s the best option in my opinion. Ideally the combo of both makes it a solid pack of you can swing it
@@GastonShutters thank you , I am thinking of 15-35 and rf 50 combo for now , mainly for youtube videos , travel , portraits and product photography , you think it will good idea ??
Mr.M TechVideoContent hmmm. I’m on the fence because you get 24mm with the 24-70 not as wide as 15mm but you also get the 35mm rage, the 50mm range and the telefoto look at 70mm. If I was you I’d go for the 24-70mm + 50mm f1.2 or get the 15-35mm the 50mm and see if you can swing the 24-105 f4.
@@GastonShutters sounds good , thanks for the help appreciate it
good Guide, simply just good
I absolutely despise wide angle shots lol. When Apple added ultra-wide lens on the iPhone I was like “that shit is useless I want more *zoom* please”
Information elsewhere says that the 70-200 RF lens is not compatible with the 1.4X and the 2X extender.
Man it's so hard for me to be confident with getting 3 lenses only (two f1.8 primes and 1 f2.8 zoom)
Decisions decisions
How about the RF 28-70mm f/2L???
Great sharp fast glass. It may replace a few primes. But I went with the 24-70mm because of the wider focal length, smaller/ lighter body and a bit more affordable. The 28-79 may not be wide enough if you want to self shoot. But this are personal preferences.
Good job! Thank you!!!!!!
Thank you
So basically the best RF lenses to buy first are all of them? lol
price and option probably the 24-70 f2.8 and f4 (more affordable)
I would suggest a 70-200 or an 85 prime with a 35mm or a 28-70
Waiting for that RF 135mm I can only dream
That should be coming in 2021
Thats all a question of your Money. I think my first lense are the RF 24-105/4
great lens bud.
I understand this lens is shockingly good. It is the one I went with as I migrate from Canon.
Awesome
Thank you
Except rf 35mm stm other lens is too much expensive it vould better rf 24-105 usm
👍
Btw you can't use the teleconverters on the 70-200
yes. I naively assumed that Canon wouldn't do that to us! my sony 70-200 takes the x2 adapter no issue.
@@GastonShutters The thing that gives you the amazing image quality is the thing that keeps the teleconverter from working - the proximity of the rear element to the back of the lens. I heard that the non-IS version of the 70-200 f/2.8 would support the converter, but that is a rumor at this point.
Have you used the 28-70 F2 L lens?
I have. Heavy expensive and not wide enough for me. I prefer the 24-70 f2.8. Lighter, wider and not much difference from f2 to 2.8. My main issue was the weight because these style of focal length I use it a lot one handed as I may be holding a reflector or even light with my other hand.
@@GastonShutters I see... I've used the main 24-70mm workhorse a lot too but considering getting the 28-70mm as it's the first of its kind. I think I'm drawn to the uniqueness of this lens. Great video by the way!
Nick Trieu thanks Nick. The 28-70 it’s a great lens nonetheless especially if you want to get that fast prime type of look in just one lens. Could be a great one lens for many types of photography. Especially portraits outdoor, environmental, and getting all that shallow seth of field at all lengths.
You mention the Canon 35mm being better than the Sony equivalent version but don’t actually state any real reasons why. As someone with both Canon and Sony gear a more in-depth comparison would be appreciated.
Hey man. Thank you for stopping by. Like I mentioned in the opening disclaimer on this video I have reviews per each lens coming up soon. I didn’t want this video to be two hours long so excuse if I omitted something. To answer your question. The reason why I like the 35RF Better than Sony is because of less CA, less distortion, way less vignetting, and better performance overall. The Sony May be a tad faster at focusing though but I find the canon way superior than the Sony version and I’m a Sony fanboy since 6 years! You can check some of my Sony lenses review here and also click on the cards that appear on this video for sample images of the 35mm in a BTS shoot I did. Consider subscribing so you don’t miss those in depth review I have coming up.
Gaston Shutters thanks for the reply! I’ll be looking forward to those in-depth reviews.
Anytime man. Ans welcome to the channel.
you say new lenses lets say 85mm f2 STM is coming which has more features and image stabalization than the expensive 85mm1.2f, but the main difference itself is the f point. thats why its expensive
yes, you are right. the lower the fstop the more expensive is to manufacture the elements
Great review, but it’s even harder for me to choose now 😭
Hahaha I agree too, but i guess it’s down to preference and type of photography