ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ก.ย. 2024
- The rebellion!!! Founding father of the Saudi State- Muhammad Ibn Abdul Al-Wahab and his power share with Muhammad bin Saud? Rebellion that established a state, yet the same rebellion, is now considered Khariji by the rulers?
This video examines the dealings of Mohammed Ibn Abdul Wahab and his allegiance with Muhammad Ibn Saud which ultimately lead to rebellion against the Othmanic Empire. Whilst it is evident that both men, were part of a rebellion, Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahab is also credited for his role in destroying shirk (polytheistic practices) across Najd (Modern day Saudia Arabia).
Being people of the Sunnah, we are the people of justice, even if that justice is against us. Unfortunately, there is a contradiction amongst the followers and rulers of today; that vehemently oppose rebellion, even though their founding fathers were responsible of this same rebellion, whether right or wrong? Where is the consistency and justice?
I am currently in need of your help in financing a couple of the necessities which is vital to my work. Without these particular tools my job can still be completed, however; this will require extra time to research and edit videos.
I humbly request if you could kindly contribute towards this cause. Not only is this cause noble but it also benefits you in reaching more reward from the all-mighty. This will be a massive help to me in releasing more content to keep you informed about the dangers of certain individuals and groups that cause mischief and disunity amongst our Muslim brothers and sister’s.
Please feel free to donate whatever you please.
Jazak-Allah-Khairan
www.gofundme.c...
#SHAMSI
#SPUBS
#SPEAKERSCORNER
#BROHAJJI
![[กูเพิ่งซื้อมึงปิดหนี] 20 นาที ผมรีวิวเกมที่แย่ที่สุดในโลก CONCORD](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/XhC-3q3Ii7I/mqdefault.jpg)
The madkhalis deny that Lawrence of Arabia (T.E Lawrence) exists however the Saudi government have made the home of Lawrence Of Arabia a Unesco Heritage site.
They are stupid. I am reading a book right now where the British Royals were giving this man (T.E Lawrence) honours. Anyone who says he didn’t exist doesn’t have a brain
@@hm1734 exactly
Some people mistakenly think Lawrence was alive at the same time as Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahhab but this is an incorrect assumption. Ibn Wahhab passed away in 1792 but Lawrence was born in 1888. However Lawrence was exposed to the ideology as it contimued as ibn Wahhab and Muhammad Saud made a pact together.
Please do more vids about things like this that expose these things that mainstream are afraid of doing so
This was a very informative video, may Allah reward you and those who worked with you on this video. I am beginning to come to realization that the Khawarij and Madhalies are two sides of the same coin, especially when it comes to their hatred and actions against Ahl as-Sunna wal-Djamaa.
JazakAllah brother I have been fighting the saudi fanboys for over a decade and one time I called on a Ramadhan night a show where Abdur raheem green was the guest and I asked him about the Saudi alliance with the west, he shun me away and said just focus on your prayers!
a massive respect brother for your works
Wow! SPUBS just got rinsed. ABU KHADEEJAH you can't hide for much longer. Someone should catch this rat once and for all.
What is spubs?i heard it many times.what does spubs stand for?
@Hector Hector why would you say something like that? Bro Hajji is not a khariji.
@@mrnice8028 salafi publications basically the madkhalis
Overwhelming evidences brought forward by the Noble Brother Haji, SPUBS are done out here!
Absolutely brilliant research. Baarakallahu feekum
Great my brother,may Allah be with you,these are taboo subjects must would rather not talk about.I agree with you 💯%
Abdul Aziz Ibn Saud was a pure Machiavellian
Have to give it bro haji and sheikh Asrar they call out wrongs within their own groups
Asrar believes in dua to the dead. Even though he isn't as extreme as other Sufis, he has no foundation in religion.
@@umarr6221 he doesn't believe this you jahil, get your facts right.
@@umarr6221 don’t talk bollocks he believes in no such thing.
@@umarr6221no he doesn’t
MasyaAllah, .... now I understand why the Saudi leaders behave as they do.
Money. Oil.
Saud Horns of Shaitan. Najd. Najidi.
1 Horn we lost the Khilafah
2 We lost Palestine
With the British this evil regime brought down the Khilafah and witg the British they gave away Palestine
Wow exactly. All of this is coming to light.
The part about ibn saud leaving Kuwait to Riyadh to restore his family’s wealth. His inspiration for this was his paternal aunt. She planted the ambition in him. The same way the original link between sh Muhammed Ibn Abdul wahab and the original Saud was made by Sauds wife.
This is the best talk on this I respect this brother for the truth, may Allah protect you and keep you on the truth which group do you follow brother?,
His a athari
Wtf
He said it in the video :D
I don’t know why I like this guy
The response Abu Khadijah had to this was two quotes of MIAW. But how convenient it was for him to ignore what's in ad-Durar As-Sanniyyah. Once again showing the selective evidece - or shall I say SUPPRESSIVE EVIDENCE of the Madakkhila to preserve their status quo among the tyrants.
In fact, when I came across the Hazimis - whom ISIS consider Khawarij - meaning they are one degree above in takfir, they were explicitly quoting from Ad-Durar As-Sanniyyah with the chain takfir. That's what got the salafi Jihadis and Hazimis into heated debates. Because one was saying chain takfir on the kaafir asli, while the other i.e. Hazimis were saying the same way MIAW was saying in reference to the Uthmani Khilafah. This is something the sincere ones have to swallow, accept, reconcile, and reflect.
Abu Mujaddid salam this is too high level for me...please slow down and explain??
@@zoubidamansour9873 Wa alaikum salam wr. Which part? The first paragraph about Abu Khadeejah or 2nd paragraph about the Hazimis & ISIS?
Abu Mujaddid I get it now Akhi I just was lost about takfir between ISIS and the hasimiswho are the hazimis? Ashaaris? Sufi’s? Māturīdīs? Never heard of them
Zoubida Mansour Hazimis are followers of Ahmad ibn Umar al-Hazimi who was from Sa3udia. His teachings formed a movement that recently gained alot of momentum after their closet followers who are from different parts of the Muslims world particularly in the Balkans, Norwegian, & Australian lands, started to come on social media and spread their pure Khariji ideas.
When ISIS formed their state in Syria, many migrated there to live among them. Once some of these Hazimis gained trust, and moved up the ranks- some to become governors of certain territories, they started to punish the Syrian Muslims on the basis of kufr i.e. Executions. ISIS did not catch this in the beginning because they thought just executions were carried out. But when the the numbers began to pile up, they decided to investigate. They found out one of the governors was a follower of Ahmad al-Hazimi. So ISIS executed that governor. Then they raised the question of how many others like him were among their ranks. So they started to purge the Hazimis and executing them. To ISIS, who have ghuluw' in their takfir, the Hazimis were the real takfiri Khawarij.
That's what my reference was about. You can read about it from their own sources or from many intelligence sources outside who reported the same.
FYI, Here is a more detailed information with sources about the infighting between the Hazimis and the Salafi Jihadis. This article shows how the Hazimis ended up infiltrating even more into the ranks of ISIS - much more than I previously thought. After the death of Turki bin 'Ali who was more of a decent scholar among them that tried to prevent the chain takfir mentality, the Hazimis gained a stronger foothold when one of ISIS Mufti was inclined towards that belief using MIAW nullfier book as the justification. The Hazimis ended up killing off higher ranked ISIS members and took over their positions. So basically they became even more takfiri after the official fall of their state. Anyways an interesting read: ctc.usma.edu/islamic-states-mufti-trial-saga-silsila-ilmiyya/
Allahu Akber! We really need such videos Akhi
It does not matter who are in power , if a muslim goverment becomes oppressor, as a muslim we should remind them the deen even if there is need of rebellion, we must do that..i dont know about the earlier times but in recent times , what the saudi govt is doing , is against our deen..
@@madeehasaeed786 Study the Islamic governance system more in depth. There are checks and balances in place to ensure rulers who become unfit to rule are peacefully transferred out for someone new. And Muslims have to give the pledge of allegiance to any proposed ruler, so they are in charge of their affairs. It's only the unjust rulers that refuse to step down who require some kind of rebellion, the same as many other 'democracies' in the world.
Also, I don't know if you are a Muslim, but if you are, you should be careful as your comment makes it seem as if you're suggesting modern forms of democracy are better than the system Allah gave us. May Allah protect us all.
@@madeehasaeed786 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Allhum du lillah, keep it up brother, my teenager child did not have all the information on this, but after watching this, allhum du lillah, many thanks,
Even the whole grave worshipping accusations... I’m not entirely convinced by that
Same.
Im yet to find a reliable historical text on this
Thanks!
Great video Bro Hajj, very well presented and very scholastic. We all appreciate your research. Could you kindly do some research on the Saudi Kingdom, and their Jewish roots.
Islam followed by Sahhabas and Muslims post Nabuwat is of 1300 years old and wahab movement is 100 year old. Wahhabism/Salafism confirms Prophet's SAW hadith on how fitna will spread in Islam and we will see different sects in Islam..
True Salafia is not a sect or hizb All you need to do is follow the path of the profit and the righteous predecessors the Quran and sunnah that makes you salafi I dont like when people make that way a bad way it’s the true path for every Muslim
@@mH-sn5vmthe issue isn’t the path, it’s claimants of it who mis apply the daleels and thus distort the path whilst claiming it’s 100% the pure path
This is a total burial for SPUBS
I am impressed with you bro Hajji, may Allah preserve you. Please tell me more about your background in religious knowledge and what Islamic creed or movement do you align more to. Could it be Ikhwanul Muslimin or Hizbut Tahrir?
His a athari
Brothers genuine question?
Talking against or questioning MBS do you think it could cause an issue when I try to go and perform Hajj, cause I heard everything is monitored when mentioning MBS?
JazakAllah k.
May Allah Swt bless and reward brother Hajji for exposing these people who seem to think they got monopoly on Tawheed and Islam.
All brothers must support Brother Hajjis work and other brothers who do similar work they are brave and lions ❤️
Much love & respect from Sweden from a mixed Swedish Pakistani ❤️🇸🇪🇵🇰
Masha allah.. this video must be shared million times....
Great video brother once again. Keep up the good work.
I would personally recomend screenshotting all the pages bro hajjis putting on screen as a ref point
Percy cox story features in the Turkish series drama “Payitat” the sultan Abdulhamid || series.
Mashaallah please expose stupidity of salafis/Wahhabis group
Slm aleyküm does anyone know the name of the Nasheed at the beginning ?
Can we discuss the treacherous works of ibn hajaaj but his purpose served a greater good continued jihaad and khilafa system overall he was better for the ummah despite hajaaj killing many sahabas
Salam brother I am new to your channel and found this clip very usual. Do you have a clip on salafia like what it is where it came from etc.
Salam brothers what’s the name of the nasheed in the video intro
th-cam.com/video/HAlA7P-z2Vo/w-d-xo.html
Alhamdu Lillah. Been waiting for this
What is the name of the book
Now I'll be waiting for their response ahaha. They'll be fiercly defending them no matter what evidence you'll bring forth to them.
great vid but the highlighting skills are killing me LOL
Wow what an enlightenment
Bro hajji can these books not be translated in English by Ibn Ghannam and Ibn Bishr??
Bro Hajji this video was 💪 Masha’Allah i always love a good history lesson
also brother Where can I get duroosniyyah as online its like $200
Is there online PDF copy
@@beinghuman185 where is that wow!
who is J1-FGC2 - Muhammad bin Saud (1744-1818) I am Related to him
Next can you explain: حقل السفانية النفطي Luck?
Great video
SubhaanAllah amazing❤
all the killing & massacring for what?? doesn't sound righteous in any way. Good to hear the history behind najd
4:40 JazakAllahu Khayran brother. I'm not sure how you missed this, but... The author clearly DIDN'T SAY the WHOLE TURKISH EMPIRE.
He clearly says the MUSHRIKEEN FROM THE TURKISH EMPIRE.
المشركين من الدولة التركية
no it doesnt
first line
فمن لم يكفر المشركين من الدولة التركية
You've gotta ask some people, are they even seeking the truth? Or are they seeking something else?
Thank you for the deatiled history
Why blame MBAW for saudi murder? I dont get it. His ruling on rulers, or their defenders, doesn't sound like a license to murder the people.
Yes it does .. If he considers someone kafir he considers their blood lawful to be spilled.
@@mahbubrm2148 But you can have a GENERAL belief without specifying that en mass to individuals. For example, if i believe skipping prayer is kufr
@@fruitmonster7 does it matter establishing hujjah one can easily bring Quran and read some verses to people and claim he has established hujjah and start massacring people . Truth is only prophets can establish hujjah .. One massage may or may not represent the truth even though we may think so . And lastly issues like praying to the dead etc their was is a huge dispute over this issues miaw said it was shirk and so he started killing based on this .
@@OriginalAndroidPhone I agree. Ibn Wahhab was not responsible for the unholy trinity between the Brits, Saud & Ale Wahab. His Dawa was good, Alhumdullah, unless you are a Sufi and want to seel Shirkiyat as Islam!
Please explain what is an athaari
Followers of the tradition of Sahaba (RA) based on text... en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Traditionalist_theology_(Islam)
@@mirfan-ullah6014 jazakallahkhair for the link I'll have a read
It's very similar to ibn Hazm views on taking the literal meanings the hiring mathhab. Alhamdullilah may Allah guide us all to the straight path.
Infact it is form of salafism that existed in 14th century. The true predecessors of modern salafi ideology....
@@fallengladiator8300 I really respect this brother i was worried he was an ashari. But alhamdullilah may Allah guide us all. Im sure athari is similar or the same as thaahiri from what i read from the links
Well done
20:45 ....can anyone please tell me the website name?
Just type those paragraphs on google you can get the site
Does broHaji ascribe to a certain madhab ?
Hanafism aka "the" mazhab (😉)
6:50 he said he sought knowledge and those who knew him believed he had knowledge when at that time 'HE DIDNT' know the meaning of laillah then at 7:36 you lied against him and said he knew and they didn't laanathullah on that
So you said the Turks had errors
But you can't talk about the errors and massive misguidance of the Saudis
This is what thus whole video is based on
We will not be questioned about anyone except ourselves so what is the point of this discussion??
Lolol the title is basically checkmate.
How authentic is that source. Shiekh Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahhaab said in his authenticwriting that "he doesnt make takfeer on those who fight him then how can he make takfeer on those who dont fight him?"
His actions contradict his statements
What does that mean then?? Are Sheik Muhammad bin abd Al wahab a bad person?? Is he a khariji for this fatwah???
Please it’s a Question of learning.
THAT is what i also want to know!
Going in dammm
Bro we want the reasons why he made takfiir on them
Taking notes here the Muslims will have very vicious civil wars due to the differing manhaj. The question we need to ask why is the ummah filled with tremendous level of Saint worshiping in my African countries this is the norm. Some believe saints now the future clear shirk for only Allah knows the future or the prophet by way of revelation or a righteous dream. We had the khalifa from 600's up until 1923 when Turks abolished it this is a 1400 legacy longer than even the Roman empire. The countries ottomans controlled were numerous we Muslims colonised with the permission of Allah off course we were brutal with the Serbs Greeks Armenians Hungarian Romanians Bulgarians and the list goes because of the methods of the ottomans who had elements of Saint veneration and lack of attari creed the tawheed did not have sound grounding in the lands controlled by the ottomans all the ottomans did was collected jizya. Where as the countries opened the salaf Islam had strong grounding. British empire lasted no more than 200 to 300 years. This whole arguments come down to seeking prestige and leadership. The salaf did not seek leadership but Allah put them in place.
Great video bro....You have successfully proved that ottoman empire at that time was muminoon , they were on Tawheed...it doesnot matter they have worshipped grave and allowed prostitution etc etc...May Allah guide you and shamsi...Allah has given you both the pearls of knowledge..still you both opposing each other bro...As a muslim it doesnot seems to be good for us...seperation and opposition just for personal ego...wallahi Allah has provided me some knowledge through you bro, but mind get upset when you both embarrass one other...
th-cam.com/video/5MuztHyRMyA/w-d-xo.html
@@mirfan-ullah6014 Thats True, they were believers for some centuries gradually they were deluded in wordly desires, in ovations, fisq and what the majority of muslims in turkey believe right now is its consequences...They ban hijab, they hang pictures of deceased on their grave, they adopted atheism, prostitution, interfaith marriages, mortgages etc etc...there are many more...i know its not proper to accuse whole ottoman empire but i m just refuting those who were at the time of sheikh muhammad ibn abdal wahhab...
Yonis Ali Yes asking prohet is kufr . And all scholar agree on this , there is a ijma on this. Hanafi Shafi Maliki Hanbali all believe that asking Prophet is kufr . Go learn Islam amd if you ask prophet then repent and become Muslim
@@MuhammadMuhammad-pd8vg saying asking the prophet (peace be upon him ) to make dua for you is like associating him to Allah is a insult of Allah and you have committed kuffur
If you are saying asking the prophet for janah or wealth or long life is kuffar then yes there’s overwhelming ijma on this and it’s clear cut associating the prophet with Allah. Astagfurllah
So be clear brother when you are saying asking the prophet for something is kuffar. Don’t generics in this subject.
Brother you are LYING because you are speaking the truth hahahaha
Brilliant work!
PLEASE tell me where can I buy this book tareekh najd in arabic?
clap clap You smashed it!
Barklahofik brother haji great job
30:59 so confusing. Do you mean it wasn't them who rebelled in MECCA?
They attacked mecca. There were other events. During the arab rebellion, many people attacked the holy places. Saudis and hashemite kingdom attacked as well.
Bro Kharaji why did you try to make peace with Ustdah Shamsi?
😂
You wish 😂, the brothers at speakers corner asked me politely not to approach him so I agreed because of their persistence as they said they don’t want any commotion in the park.
Go speak to Sam Dawah who was the one that approached me and Abu Ismail Al-Farsi was a witness among many other brothers.
Ustadh Shamsi 😂, I cant believe you actually believed whoever told you this nonsense.
@@BroHajji I believe abu ismail al farsi himself a wahhabi. Why you still with em??
@Yonis Ali How can you prove that??
@Yonis Ali Shut up man, if you don't know about something honestly research about it in sincerely without siding with anybody. His father was a scholar and his brother was too they were hanbali jurispudence it is true.But athari is aqeedah or creed dude. All the difference came in b/n them is only after ibn wahhab procecute what shiekh ibn taymiyyah,ibn kathir and ibn qayyim(may Allah rest their soul in peace).
Let me ask your what is difference in opinion b/n ibn wahhab and ibn taymiyyah.Honestly,he might be differ in some terms with sheikh but not in aqeeda.
Let me clear your aqeeda
Where is Allah really i.e (place)??? Answer me..
@Yonis Ali th-cam.com/video/r1ck3jHUKW0/w-d-xo.html Salafiyyoon.
Excellent!
Bro Hajji I can see you tried to be balanced re Ibn Wahhab but there was no need to bring him into the discussion. He is a noble man but you will find faults with any man if you look close enough. I believe the faults you have pointed out such as Takfir upon (all) the ppl of Makkah are loose language on the part of the author and MISUNDERSTANDING on your part, rather than specific Takfir on each individual of Makkah [ps - you inserted the word "all" in your exegesis]. As for the Ottomans he uses the word "Minhum" ["from them"] which suggests it wasn't specific but general Takfir and the statement about ppl of Makkah came straight after the comment about the Ottomans (i.e. continuation of the topic). But there are grounds from Islam to make both general & specific Takfir (with conditions) on Shirkiyat like those practiced by the Sufi religion, which are very similar to the Kufr of the Rafidah belief & practices which you are an expert in exposing.
My points are two: Ibn Wahhab had legitimate ijtihad because of what was happening in his time, but he is not responsible for the later unholy treacherous Trinity between the Brits, Al Saud & Ale Al-Wahhab (which is in itself is Kufr according to Ibn Wahhab). Secondly, you've missed a golden opportunity here for the Talafis: If the Ottoman was indeed a kufr state, why not Al Saud? The same conditions exists today for the Saudis which existed for the ottoman state to be Kufr then.
Lastly, we see how disgusting bootlickers the Talafis are: when it came to defending these rulers they were all over these comment section. But when it comes defensing their so called ideologue they are nowhere to be seen. Why, I wonder?
His a scholar who went to the gates of the ruler and till today that created a system in which the scholars are loyal to the house of saud ( ahlul sheikh) and we do know what the hambali school says about the scholars of the rulers like ibn abdul wahab. So your obvious admiration of him been “noble”
Must be halted
Your argument is flawed right from the start. The Ottoman Empire had no rule over the Arabian peninsula, therefore it can’t be classed as a rebellion/khrurooj/etc.
Thank you and good night.
Your ignorance is apparent. They ruled Hijaz you idiot which is in the Arabian Peninsula 😂.
You meant to say they didn’t rule العارض و نجد 😂
I refuse to believe this is honest ignorance
For Talafis who complain amount music, here's one for you: th-cam.com/video/qpc1TnZVnDo/w-d-xo.html
Naam
Ski
Anyone who opens his heart would understand how important the deobandi ulima are when it comes to our time peroid
Wallahi your fanaticism has no bounds
This statement reeks of a person who cannot think for himself.
ozair tahir Why dont the deobandi ulama condemn kufri democracy and secularism
@@MuhammadMuhammad-pd8vg we don't like it
@@BroHajji are you not deobandi
@@ArifRahman-te8ry He is Hanafi Athari. The deobandis are hanifas and at the end of the day, still Muslims. But unfortunately they believe lots of shirk is permissible like making dua to Prophet Muhammad (saws) and their aqidah is all wrong
Najdi full stop
The very same ottoman army who finishes the wahabis will later revolt against the ottoman caliphate. The ottoman caliph will then excommunicating them. So wahabis doesn't seem to be alone in having issues with takfir. Futhermore, ottoman empire did not have problem to revolt against abbasi caliphate when they invaded mamluk state :
« When it became clear that the Egyptian Pasha had no intention of pulling back his forces, the Porte ordered the Syrian valis to raise men and send them to Aleppo in preparation for fighting Ibrahim's troops. Mehmed Pasha, deputy of the vali of Aleppo, was given the title of Serasker (Commander-in-Chief) of Syria and Arabia and was entrusted with heading this force that it was hoped would stop the advance of the Egyptian army. Furthermore, on 3 March 1832 the annual tevcihat(imperial appointments to the posts of provincial governors) were announced leaving the positions of the governors of the eyalets of Egypt, Jedda and Crete vacant until Mehmed Ali and Ibrahim should respond positively to the Porte's request to withdraw. When this failed, a fetva (religious edict) was issued, in effect, EXCOMMUNICATING both Mehmed Ali and Ibrahim Pasha and appointing in their respective pashahks Huseyin Pasha, the destroyer of the Janissaries, who was then Governor of Edirne. In addition, the same Pasha was appointed head of the Ottoman forces in Anatolia with the task of joining Mehmed Pasha of Aleppo and preparing jointly the task of stopping Ibrahim Pasha »
Khaled Fahmy, author of « All the Pasha's Men: Mehmed Ali, His Army and the Making of Modern Egypt »
Shame on you! The Ottomans at least established a khilafah according to Quran and Sunnah and Salaf. What did the Saudi/wahhabi did? Shirk!
Wow just wow u are brotherhood sinks so law and u dispersed for ottomans so bad that u batery ur self and try to trash a great revival that saved Islam from shirks
Learn English and watch the video objectively
Lol the hypocrisy of this poor fella, criticizing others while he has music in his intro. Nobody gonna take u serious kiddo
Ibi freeman it's called nasheed. There is no music in there. It's a form of poetry. Seriously, do you Madkhalis lack common sense? All you have to do is use your ears and listen if it has music or not.
@@AbuMujaddid sorry khwaraije I meant "nasheed" problem solved, are you suppose to be in Syria and fighting for "your" religion? Don't u see children getting bombed and you are here replying to a person (me) who is a nobody, what happend to be a lion of islam go travel to ur bagdadi ohh wait he aint got khalifa anymore yikes
@@582riley Shows how much you actually know of fiqh and hukm shar'ii. Firstly, your fiqh was off. And you brush that off and try to divert it to making a joke out on me. You call me a Khariji, when I'm not even making khurooj. You essentially made my blood halal. This is how loose your tongue is. It's no wonder why your head belongs inside a cardboard box. You simply do not think Islamicly, but based off a cult mentality.
@@582riley What a munafiq you are. Criticizing why he got music on his video when YOU got a music playlist called 'songsss'. And it's filled with fa7isha. Allah exposed your nifaq because you are so much indulged in it. Let's see what excuse you make on that. Go practice what you preach munafiq.
@@AbuMujaddid lmao. The guys a hypocrite hahahahs
Calling out a nashedd and had songs folder hahahaha
You exposed this najdi bro lol
Joke
Saudi is a khariji kingdom