Suzuki Swift Sport Hybrid 48V: 0-100 acceleration, instrument cluster menus, start/stop system
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 ก.ค. 2024
- The 2020 A2L Swift Sport Hybrid 48V performs excellent!
The combination of the K14D combustion engine with 48V SHVS system accelerates way faster than Suzuki says. Official statement is 9.1 seconds for 0-100km/h.
After some test runs, it was clear that the car is faster with traction control ON and shift before redline! This is because the Hybrid system only supports up to 5000rpm, so I decided to use this as a shift point. And the times improved! Letting the clutch slip a bit the first few meters helps as well ;)
Let me know what you think or what else you would like to see!
HKS Exhaust soundclip: • Suzuki Swift Sport Hyb...
Recorded with GoPro Hero5 Black.
Time recording with EOBD facile.
Specs:
Suzuki Swift Sport Hybrid
Model 2020
ZCC3S
K14D Boosterjet engine
129hp/95kW
235Nm
48V mild hybrid system
10kW
53Nm
HKS Hi-Power SPEC-L exhaust - ยานยนต์และพาหนะ
For anyone interested in the technical part: th-cam.com/video/dpc2KDQa9a4/w-d-xo.html
Other testers have also confirmed that Suzuki has hugely understated this car's acceleration times. Very informative and well-made video, thank you.
For all owners of a European Suzuki K14C engine; Suzuki has developed a new software for the Engine Control Module. This new software improves performance due to a less drastic power limitation when lower quality fuel is detected. It’s available at your official Suzuki dealership.
Just what I was looking for, thank you, very well made!
Thank you
Changing at 5000 with a near full battery is almost 2 sec faster than claimed by Suzuki.
my swift sport 2020 hybrid (bog standard) did 6,6sec/100km/h on dry weather with TC enabled. these little hot hatches are really understated.
Fantastic news! Can’t wait to drive it!
Thank you for this very interesting video.
Good work! 😉👍
Heb met deze wagen een testrit gedaan ,en was van het eerste moment verkocht ,heb heb dan ook besteld ,binnen enkele weken is de nieuwe wagen in me bezit ,kijk er echt naar uit ,leuke video trouwens.
Hallo, wat vind je nu van deeze auto?
Nice
Hi, congratulation great car! With the stock exhaust the car is more slow? The new exhaust was easy to put? Thank you.
Mário Vieira Thanks! I haven’t really driven the car with the stock exhaust, so don’t know the difference. There is a big difference in weight of the exhaust system! And yes, it’s very easy to install. Removing the original is only 2 bolts!
Thank you very much for this interesting video! It is very useful, considering that at present time no tests from journal are yet available. I drove the car and I can say that it is faster that declared and very fun! Especially on mountain roads! I have a question! I don't undestand what happened when you did 7.34..I mean, when did you change from first to second gear? What was the final gear reached before the end of the video? Thank you very much!
Emanuele Pintaldi no problem! In The video on 2:03 shift from first to second gear. 2:05 shift to third gear. It’s not possible to drive 100km/h in second gear.
@@Ieteelstoem Thanks a lot! Sorry for the stupid question ; )! I was in dubt if you reached the fourth gear instead of third! Anyway 7.34 is an impressive time! Well done and thanks!
7:34 is bullshit
@@Rene-ny9pc you mad bro? 😂
it's very eager!
🔝
👌👌👌
How did you pass the first 999Km ? Were you "babying" the car driving it only till 4000RPM or not ? Thank you !
Did you feel any power increase after installing the HKS exhaust system?
great video, thank you.
let me ask you some questions.
1- is there any chance to disable that "start and stop" feature??
2- when you are in first gear, moving the car below 15km/h, the engine is off???
in first gear it seems to be faster than the k14c version, however above 5000 rpm is dead, like a turbo diesel.
3- jugding by the way it looks, do you think the turbo is even smaller than in the k14c??? because i have heard the turbo is different.
thank you.
gonzagnr2 Thanks! 1-yes, simply push a button. 2-only in neutral below 15km/h, so when rolling to a stop. 3-they went for more torque/drive ability with less peak hp and less emissions
@@Ieteelstoem thank you for the reply.
did you ask at suzuki when buing the car why the electric assitance turn off above 5000 rpm???
in my opinion, since the turbo is so small and breathless at high rpm, the electric assitance must push until rev limiter.
@@gonzagnr2 since an electric motor has also torque and efficiency characteristics, I guess at very high RPM it's simply not viable to keep it powered. Anyway I didn't asked Suzuki so I could be wrong
@@gonzagnr2 Electric engines usually have small and vanishing torque when they reach the maximum RPMs. By constrast, at very low RPMs torque is very high.
Hi! very intersting video!!! thank u!!! have you driven the swift sport 140hp? can you say if there are big differencies between the hybrid and that one (140hp)? i know that the "old one" really had more than 140hp, 155hp i know...i dont know if also the hybrid will has more than 129hp delcared...do you know spmething about it? thank you a lot!!!
giovanni martinelli Yes I have. To me it feels the hybrid version (K14D) has more torque in midrange (2500-5000rpm). The previous K14C pulls harder to the redline. In the comments of the HKS exhaust video we talk about this as well!
rob It’s only the section after the catalyst and GPF so I guess it’s more the ‘feeling of speed’ (=sound)
Did someone drive the 140 and the 129 hp version? Which one felt more dynamic?
monteroni_di_lecce I did. It’s discussed in the comments of this video: th-cam.com/video/AGKi0Uz1EkE/w-d-xo.html
Hello, how many rpms it has on 6th gear at 130km/h? Previous Swift Sport (standard non-Hybrid version 1.4 BoosterJet 103kW) had 3000rpm @ 130km/h on 6th gear. Thank you.
Hello, the car has about 2900rpm at 130km/h
@iNSTAGiB The system continuously monitors the charge. I’ve never seen below 1 bar. Even if the battery should be used completely, it will quickly be charged by the ISG
01:16 Why did the speedometer stall for a moment at 45kph?
It’s wheelspin
Elle va très bien cette version hybride... pourtant, j’avais des doutes.
la version non hybride va bien mieux
@@romaincandellier4152 effectivement j’ai la version non hybride et je confirmes que ça roule bien. La mienne sans modif sur banc 157cv!
Great video! Do you know the highway fuel consumption? I’m interested in the car but there is very little data available about it. Thanks!
Illya Didenko 5.6l/100km according to the dashboard computer. This was on a 67km trip, adaptive cruise control set to 120km/h with traffic.
@@Ieteelstoem That's actually very good for a gasoline car, thanks!
@@abiopc I drive the none-hybrid sport and I can confirm that it is very fuel saving. I often have around 5,2-5,4 l / 100 km.
The 9.1 second is because Suzuki reports the worst case scenario if the hybrid system is not charged.
Great video! But pls, can u try to acc 0-100 starting from second gear and revving to cca 5k rpm for third gear?
Did you try a 0-100 with start in second gear? The none-hybrid sport was faster when starting with second gear!
Ohlukei I did not. From standstill it feels like killing the clutch. But I did a pull from about 20kmh in second gear!
@@Ieteelstoem I know what you mean. I personally avoid 0-100 attempts because I feel its a pain for the car. D:
How do this car feels like? seems to be feeling quite powerful
It’s feeling especially very light, nimble and quick. With a good 205 tire and the HKS exhaust it provides a lot of driving pleasure!
Have you try skipping the 2nd gear in 0-100?
I'd rather skip 1. gear
Did anyone saw that the odometer 999 km?
Isn't it suppose to be slower than the previous one? the 140hp had a time of 8.1, this one is 9.1?
Heisenberg It seems our Japanese friends are quite modest with the numbers!
@@Ieteelstoem The outgoing one (140hp) used to constantly make around 7.5 (some say that with larger tires, you could get it to 7.0), but this one is heavier and has less power
@@heisenberg6481 less peak power, but in low and mid is more strong, maybe it works well :)
@@mariovieira6675 and 129cv + 14cv electric, same power at least
How can you see the Battery level?
There is an ‘Info’ button on the steering wheel to scroll through the different screens on the instrument cluster
In your video it seems like it’s as fast as the previous one. So why do they announced it as a 1 second slower in your opinion?
Also I would like to ask you a question nobody did yet (or I never read it).
If you would have had the possibility to choose one of them for free, which one would you choose and why? numbers and prices aside! Only feelings and fun.
Thank you in advance I would really appreciate your reply
91DarioASR maybe they wanted to play safe. In general, Suzuki performs mostly better than announced.
For daily usage, I would go with the K14D 48V without a doubt. The car feels like it has definitely more midrange torque and overal smooth driving. It’s better equipped and will be more efficient in fuel consumption.
Only as a track car, I might consider the K14C since there are many aftermarket parts available and it has a little more power in high RPM (+5000)
Ieteelstoem thank you very much for this comment
Hi, I've got the same car very recently. Just a question: when the car is accelerating and I press the clutch to change gear I feel like the engine continues revving for a bit, it's sort of delayed; it seems like you also have this "problem", am I right?
That's called Rev-Hang:
www.carthrottle.com/post/rev-hang-explained-and-why-petrolheads-hate-it/
I don't know the particular case on the swift.
Come si mette off tcs?
Long push on the ESP button
Hi, the exhaust are HKS. But the other completly Stock? Thanks for answer.
Steven Flaig yes!
@@Ieteelstoem less hp then the 14C and faster. I can't believe.😉 Thanks for quickly answer and sorry for bad english
It sounds good not like these new freaking 3 cylinder engines
Three pot engines sound great I think. They've a nice warble but they're not as good as 5 cylinder engines. 4 cylinder just sounds standard tbh
I agree, I hate 3 cylinder engines, at least in cars
Third gear takes 2 sec of time - otherwise if 2ND was longer time 0-100 would be 5 sec 💪
Na it doesn't work exactly like that because you would have to lengthen 2nd gear reasonably significantly so it could hit 60 in second. That would mean that the torque at the wheels would be less for 2nd gear so it wouldn't accelerate as hard. It may help the time but you would loose a second or so from the longer gearing. If the person could change gear faster that would help!!
@@robertowen8281 You are right . Didnt think of that 😁
start/stop system is design to make cars fail on the long run.
try to keep if off.
Agree, if you drive your turbo glowing hot. In regular usage, modern oils are capable enough to ‘stick’ to all engine parts untill next restart
not bad for a 1.4L turbo :D Stage 1 could easily go up to 200hp
No. The new hybrid engine showes very poor tuning headroom because the turbo is smaller
@iNSTAGiB There is no point. Those who want the better drivers card buy the non hybrid model anyway. It is cheaper, lighter and with a remap it instantly has 180hp and 300NM
@@profix25lo wait I need confirmation lol, where did you find the info that says hybrid swift has smaller turbo?
@@xorkatoss From the forums. Dont remember if UK or german forum
I think best you can do it´s remap it until 160hp...
7,34...Really?😉🤔
I was somehow expecting that the electric engine was going to take the car to at least 6 seconds 0 to 100...
I actually think the 1.2 hybrid version sounds better, it has more character. Im surprised by that.
Abarth 595 sounds better.
Yeah, but most are driven by Love Island watchers. ;)
is it 4x4?
No, Swift Sport is only available in FWD
8 seconds very fast