Should Small Cities Have Metros ? || क्या छोटे शहरों में मेट्रो होनी चाहिए?
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 10 ก.ค. 2024
- #train #indianrailways #india
Should Smal Cities have Metro Systems like large Cities
🔔 Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @powertrain
OUR OTHER CHANNELS
⚪VLOG CHANNEL - / @aakashbhavsar2342
⚪FOOTAGE DEMOCRACY - / @footagedemocracy3663
⚪SHORTS CHANNEL - / @powershorts1068
FOLLOW US ON
⚪INSTAGRAM 1 - / aakash_rb
⚪INSTAGRAM 2- / powertrain_yt
⚪FACEBOOK - / powertrainofficial
⚪TWITTER - / powertrain_yt
⚪DISCORD - / discord
_____________________________________________________________________
INTRO MUSIC IF PRESENT - LEMMiNO - A THOUSAND YEARS
• LEMMiNO - A Thousand W...
CC BY-SA 4.0 - วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี
![[ไฮไลต์] แบดมินตันชาย SHI Yu Qi (จีน) vs วิว กุลวุฒิ (ไทย) รอบ 8 คน | โอลิมปิก 2024](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/f7z7taforOM/mqdefault.jpg)
As long as it is financially viable, i don't see any problem building metro in any city
@@jojosoni absolutely vese bhi many metros in india are barely profitable
They mostly think about the community service when building metros bas itni earnings hi jaye ki koi loan h vo repay ho jaega and operation costs, salary nikal aaye
Uss metro se jo aspas growth hota vo main cheej hoti h uss line ke liye
In india most metros are not profitable due to less network coverage
Ek do line bana se wo city ke haar jagah nahi jati jis wajeh se wo profitable nahi hai
@@sushma3216 ha i think indore me esa hua tha
Jab ek chota sa line to log usko bas maje me use karte h joy ride jese
Par jab lenght badi to ab actually log usko commute ke lie us kar rahe
Direct profit loss kabhi nahi dekha jata metros me bas itni kamai ho jaye ki loans pure ho jaye and operational cost, salary etc.
@@sushma3216as India's middle class gets richer it's not a problem
@@kennedyspace1159except delhi metro none is profitable
"प्यास लगने के बाद कुआँ न खोदें"
People had the same worries for Nagpur Metro a few years back.
But looking at the traffic conditions, it became evident that after 10 years, it would be "IMPOSSIBLE" to construct a single Metro line because the traffic would be 20X worse and dense.
Now, when I look at Pune Metro and the traffic, I wish it would have been constructed 10 years ago when the population was half of what it is today.
Agree, same goes here for Kanpur Metro. It is too late now.
Absolutely, and also once the cities become big, land rates for metro stations would also sky rocket, and public inconvenience during the construction process would be more too. It’s better to start constructing metros now in smaller cities, and also some long term planning for the metro lines as the city expands.
Same for patna metro
Urban population of Muzaffarpur is approx 560000 currently . It is the 2nd fastest growing city in North Bihar
Patna,hajipur and Muzaffarpur are like sister cities. We can go from one to another in 2 hrs approx so they can be connected through a single metro system just like faridabad- delhi- gurugram- noida
मुजफ्फरपुर हाजीपुर के बिच ने पूरा गाँव है.
और गाँव मे मेट्रो?
@@gorakhpurcapitalofpurvanch3245Faridabad is basically a gao in NCR and metro is there.
@@gungunraju6666Go ahead and build a metro bridge on Ganga and tell me what is more viable.. a metro separately or building a bridge?
And the thing about metro is, it is slow. It takes almost 1 hour to cover Rajeev chowk to sector 62 noida and it is mere 17 km. Now tell me how much time will it take to go from Hajipur to Muzaffarpur or Muzaffarpur to Patna? Also how many metros would it require to have a frequency of 10 minutes on each station?
@गोरखपुरपूर्वांचल3245 गोरखपुर जाओ 1 सहर इतना बस होता है
Delhi - gurugram - faridabad - noida be like
Patna - Muzaffarpur - Hajipur highter than Delhi
Population total district
Patna 8 million and muzaffarpur 7million or vaishali 5 million total 20 million more than
Small city in next 50 years their population gonna double
Bihar is labor state of India. And India is labor country of the world.
no india population will stop growing after 2058-2060 and after 2060 our population start decreasing
@@Dhruv-Kumar harsh truth
@@Dhruv-Kumarremove Bihar
@@sanatanihindu383 Even after population stop growing, it ia huge population.
I am from Muzaffarpur. It doesn't need metro. It needs proper drainage and wider roads.
Wo nahi milega India me. Patna me bhi wo nahi hai, na hi delhi mumbai me 😂
This is what being stuck in traffic at Bhagwanpur, Ramdayalu, Aghoriya Bazar, Kalambagh Chowk, Motijheel does to a MF.
Wider Roads chahiye. Dhakkan Ramdyalu se Aghoriya Bazar wale road ka width dekha hai tune? ya fir Kalambagh se Aghoriya Bazar wali road ka? Sheher ke andar utni wide road pe to chalne ki jagah nahi hai aur inko aur zyada wide road chahiye mass transit ki jagah. Road ko wide karne se traffic badhta hai naa ki kam hota hai chomu🤦♂
You need everything at once, you need metros as well as drainage systems and wider raods, all at the same time.
A good drainage system is a basic need. Even the Indus Valley civilization had better drainage. @@rickgolder6818
why can't you demand both apne yaha sala yahi dikkat hai
high quality trains banne ke baat hoti hai toh sab general ke dibbe maangte hai
jab general ke banne lagte hai toh bullet train maangte hai
isiliye kisi ko kuch bhi nahi milta, isiliye demand both wider roads and as well as metros
In Bhubaneswar Metro is going to be completely funded by state government.
West Odisha ko bhi mile 😢
@@stormssf8538 When the population gets viable enough, Metro will be built. Bhubaneswar currently is the only city in Odisha with 10 lakh + population. Combining with Cuttack the total area has almost 25 lakh population! So a metro can be viable there. While, other cities of Odisha like Rourkela, Brahmapur don't have that much population. If any other city gets to a million plus population metro will be demanded there, which is highly unlikely in near future.
@@notcliche14 ok but you guys are having every thing not just metros , SEZ , most of the industries
I think sambalpur, jharsuguda, sundargarh and rourkela would make the population more in future
@@notcliche14 I am currently staying at bhubaneswar, we face alot of racism because we don't speak the desia Odia language,
how can we expect to grow with such racist people?
@@stormssf8538 ofcourse I'm not denying metro in west Odisha, just that it needs a bit more time, maybe 5 years, before we can conceptualize the project.
I would like to invite people to play games like Cities Skylines to get a clear understanding of what infrastructure considerations actually mean. Too many people out here have a very polarized knowledge on these things based on uneducated opinions.
@@vikrantsingh6580 please take power train guy with you
@@vikrantsingh6580 mai khelta hu City Skyline and i can say vaha ke mechanics are very different to what happens in india.
Bro it's a game
@@kennedyspace1159 its a start to get the basics of logistics down. I've seen tweets with thousands of likes drawing insane conclusion about projects in India without having a clear understanding of what actually goes on while making those decisions. Mechanics are different, sure, after all it is just a game, but they are not erratic.
@@vikrantsingh6580 agreed
Nashik city needs proper metro..... Not nio metro
Yes also Sambhajinagar captial of Marathwada region should have Metro railway system..
@@pokemonfanbeast393 capital of marawada region😂😂😂😅😅
What is this 😂😂
@@sushma3216 i don't understand what you are saying?
@@pokemonfanbeast393it's Aurangabad not pavbhajinagar😂😂
@@osmanbey1271 its Chatrapati Sambhaji Nagar ❤
Varanasi me ropeway banake logo ka pagal bana diya hai. 15lakh ki city key liye 4 km ka ropeway bna rahe hain. Aur metro project pichle 7 sal se approval ka intejar kar raha hai.
Bhai usko tourists use kar sakte hai. City ke liye Metro aa jayegi kuch years ke baad
@@learndesignwithdev kuchh years kabhi nahi aayega😂
@@Dhruv-Kumar Bhai dekhte hai, issue is Varanasi is not horizontally expanded as a city. Ab 20 km ke liye kya metro chalana. Minimum distance kuch toh ho ki log use kare. But yes, agar koi Pilgrim tourists circuit jaisa develop ho which encompasses whole city, tab use hoga.
Varanasi k kayi ilaako mei land acquisition impossible hi samjho. Bahot saare logo k khaandani ghar h aur wo saare gharo k upar metro lagaane gaye toh ho gaya kaam... Ropeway bahut sasta aur profitable h as a tourist attraction toh wo easily ho rha h.
Congested areas mei metro underground hi ban sakti h but budget alag level pe jayega
Metro train needs existing govt aquired continuous land preferably a wide road.
yes we should have 6000 km metro lines either in construction or plan by 2030.
background music accha nhi hai
Ya
Few more points..
1) Having same type of metro train network across India provides excellent support system
2) It gives lot of bargaining power to Govt to reduce manufacturing and depoynent costs due to economis of scale
3) A support engineering skill set will be setup where mass engineers are adopting and working in this sector with long term (more than 100 years) careers.
4) If a metro is getting failed in a city can be given to other company to operate. The company can take risk if operating multiple systems. Experience will eventually make it profitable.
5) Single type of rails, metro rakes, electric amd ancilliary systems and experience means less and less chances of failure. It works like charms and very reliable.
6) Grade separation is very important for cities in Infia where civic sense is almost non existant. At grade transport systems will cause chaos and accidents.
Here in Maharashtra city like Nashik,Sambhaji Nagat still no any thinking of metro and both cities contribute major share in GDP
Sambhaji Nagar metro will be approved soon because of AURIC city....Centre and state are investing more in Sambhaji nagar.....Nashik will remain neglected
This development is must needed in India ,we are not developing in barren land but growing cites so in future it's must needed.
And always remember just investing in present it will give compounding benefits,if we secure future expansion criteria in it as the land price will go up.
@@Meta-qe7tv sahi baat and ese hi to development hota around roads, highways to ToD naam ka ek concept hota h , Transit oriented development
Bus routes, metro, railways ke around development. Which is a good thing,
Bhai Paisa bhi toh ho?! It takes massive investment.
I was born in Bhagalpur but I live in Delhi. I totally agree with this video. If we look at conditions of Bihar which is not so satisfactory but some cities like Bhagalpur have shown drastic progress. I was amazed to see my such development in my city and that too within 2 years. Bhagalpur is a major exporter of silk all over India and there are many MSMEs but the government never focused on supporting such industries but after BJPs win there was some considerably change. Not a support of any party , it is fact.
Only Patnaik , Bhagalpur and Nalanda(Bakhtiyarpur) can take Bihar to a great height
I understand what you are saying but your video is solely based on population numbers and not the actual population commuting.
Out tier 2 and tier 3 cities are different from western world and we can't have metros in those cities because the population commuting won't be huge. And at the end it will be a white elephant for the government. You need to have your basic infrastructure such as buses aligned on the right routes in these cities.
And he also said, "future ke liye abhi se bana ke rakh do". These things are depreciating, capital intensive assets, so ensuring viability is fundamental. Jaipur metro has below-par occupancy despite traversing through high population density neighbourhoods because in those areas people usually travel small distances.
The population of Ranchi is 30 lakhs around right now but still gov is ignoring us for the metro project even Patna has also got metro now and day by day the city is being expanded but still the transportation lacks here and metro is a must need project here
No offense but aapne 15 lakh ko 30 lakh bata diya
Second what do you mean "even Patna"?? No insult to Ranchi,it's a very beautiful and peaceful city especially compared to patna, but patna is simply richer,more populated and far denser to support a metro than ranchi 😅
@@aaryankumar8770 bro the 30 lacs is a metropolitan population of Ranchi rn and u need to visit the outskirts of Ranchi rn the price of every plot is being higher and higher day by day bcoz of a lot of infrastructure and buildings are being built in the outskirts of city am not saying here without any facts you can even check the data.ik Patna is densely populated but talking about the recent data of 2021 -2024 Ranchi has crossed 25 lac plus and its expected to hit 50 lc by fc year 2034-2035
@@Transform_234patna's metro population is around 50 lakh now
If youre using one parameter use the same for everyone na
Though no doubt cities need more focus,both need to be new centres of growth like Bangalore hyderabad
@@aaryankumar8770😢
@@aaryankumar8770 ya obviously Patna is densely populated but all am saying is the neighbour capital of Ranchi are getting metro like Patna ,bbsr ,Kolkata and even now a small cities like Agra tooo to I don’t know why do central is ignoring metro project for the Ranchi as it’s being densely populated according to its size and it’s almost the 3 rd time they have rejected the proposal there was almost a plan of running monorail in Ranchi in 2015 only but they do ignore these things idk why
Worst idea :
Govt thinking to start Neo metro; rubber tyre metro.
Mexico did that.
Bro make a video on why trams are not a good option for the Indian subcontinent. Please
Trams are small - catered towards low population density.india has high population density so we need bigger trains
There needs to be some level of civic sense and wisdom in people for trams to be successful. In a country like India, where people have zero civic sense, Trams will never be successful
Trams are good for tier 3 cities but India doesn't have enough funds for those cities.
Trams = Buses
Nobody gives pass to these in traffic, both get stuck in traffic
Trams require Overhead wires & Road Tracks to go anywhere whereas Buses don't even require roads 😂
There's your answer
No video required
Well explained.
I'm from Muzaffarpur and I don't know about future but currently the city needs a robust public transport.. around 10 years ago we used to Have city ride by Muzaffarpur Nagar Nigam.. i think small buses like them powered by electricity could be viable in Traffic of muzaffarpur.
I'm excited to see what route they will pick with metro because current inner cities of Muzaffarpur is not at all feasible for Metro construction.. maybe this could lead to creation of a new city of Muzaffarpur.
Also I'm against the argument that metro should only be in overcrowded cities.. do you know what metro's contribution to traffics of overcrowded cities is? It's almost negligible.. so start sooner when there are less cars on the road and people get used to public transport so they don't buy cars that much.
The biggest argument i hear is "Well, this other city has this much population and it still doesn't have a metro".. don't you wish it had before it's traffic became what it is today?
We need metro in Mirzapur and Wasseypur
Warangal deserves a Metro in the next 5 to 10 yrs.
Warangal City is the second largest in Telangana , 17th largest in India by area (417 Sq.km.) is a tri city (Warangal ,Hanamkonda & Kazipet) and is Greater municipal corporation and over 15 lakh population and prestigious institutes like NIT Warangal, Kakatiya medical college, kakatiya university, Kaloji Narayan rao health university, Kakatiya institute of technology and sciences , under construction 24 floored Govt super speciality hospital etc And tourism spots like Kakatiya fort , thousand pillar temple , Amma Bhadrakali temple , Amma padmakshi temple etc and several industrial parks , It parks , Textile park , world's 2nd largest agriculture market etc .
are you sure warangal is 17 largest city in area in india
They should setup links with nearby cities
trams could be option for neo cities or per planned cities like amaravati ( ANDHRA) , global city gurugram , lavasa ,
Please make a video about zoning laws in india and how it needs improvement by comparing it to better zoning laws like japanese or European. Not america's tho
Ease of public k baare me bhi sochna chahiye sirf profit pe nahi
Metro ke badle urban ring railway jyada accha vikalp hai. Ismein kharch bhi kam lagega aur efficiency bhi adhik hogi.
you can see here a guy good in infra does not mean he has good geo knowledge, badly want to give some valid points but i am sure that he is not one of them who can maturely take and accept mistakes
Jaipur metro ki video banalo❤
Muzaffarpur don't even have good roads and bihar government talking metro
If you compare with Kolkata, banglore and Pune they also don't have good road bro😂
No compare with Patna , In Bihar only Patna has road infra other city have Street infra @@techgyan495
I feel like Muzaffarpur city is moving towards creating a new city and leaving the old unorganised chaos that is inner city. You can see the way Zeromile is getting moved to Bakhari, also Kanti area is way more clean and good to expand as a city.
Sabse badi samasya atikraman hai. Wo hata do baki jarurat hi nahi padegi
Small city ko future me badi hogi fir problem badegi banane me issliye abhi se banakar rakhni chahiye
Full support i also think it is a community service we shouldn't liok at profit but dont cry when ridership is made free.
kisi city ko develop karne ke bad waha metro banana bahut hi muskil task ho jata hai but jab metro ban jai or uske aas pas city khud ba khud develop hote chale jate hai kyuki waha logo ka footfall ho jata hai mai muzaffarpur se hu or yaha densely populated area me metro ke lie roads pe jagah nahi bache hai but agar aaj jaha pe metro ko banaya ka sakta hai yaha pe agar aak ke samai me yaha nahi ban pata hai to future me or v dikat hoga kyuki city bahut teji se expand kar raha hai .
Best wishes you
Can patna metro be connected to Hajipur?
Not possible at the moment because of the high cost of the bridge over Ganga and Hajipur is still a largely rural district.
I am from muzaffarpur ❤
i think criteria for metro should be population desnity and connectivity to nearby metropolitian city ... major emphesis should be on poulation
Bhai mai Gaya ka hi rehne wala hoon, par apki video thumbnail se mai offend ho gaya. 💀
Gaya me agar metro 🚇 aa jayegi to Gaya abhi jo max 20-30 kms me failla hua hai wo aasani se 70-80 kms me faill jayega aur Gaya ka development tezi se next level par chala jayega 😍.
i am from Muzaffarpur and think the same
We need every district in india metro trains well connected jis se log travel as well as job kar paye future me india ki economy badegi we need this
On Abstract I think Mathura-Varanasi city has a dire need of public transport which doesn't run on existing roads and connects all the significant places in the city for pilgrimage and tourist.
It can be a ropeway or underground tunnels or dedicated BRTS on flyovers. May be a metro?
Yes Small Cities should definitely have Metro Trains..
City which is 0.5 million+ in India or bihar or any state in India deserves metro...india is growing in population day by day so it will not be flop. In the beginning we heard about Jaipur and Lucknow metro that it's in loss. But today time has been changed ..❤❤
Hope you have heard about the cost-benefit analysis and internal rate of return. Metro is too expensive and in the first go, the small cities should be provided with sufficient local bus service. Metro will come once the bus service is unable to meet the needs of local transportation.
Yes we need, Tier 2 & 3 cities are future
Well 5000km metro is not an impossible target. In fact Metro is the only project which even ministers agree on that. So in a way, this will help a lot
Bhagalpur is not a small city.. I am from this region.
any city with less than 20L population should have a sub-urban rail to begin with
Mp .
Indore
Bhopal
Jabalpur
Gwalior .....need indore bhopal under construction in metro
Serious question: When these cities don't even have enough jobs, does the metro still make sense? I know that in UP people are not using metro enough and still prefer other modes of transportation because of convenience.
Isn't lucknow metro profitable though?
How can you generalise by saying "people don't use it"
Many people don't use it in kanpur or agra because they are very small networks right now
The same was true in pune too till last year
Pune ke liye aise shabd to nhi the tumhare paas?
Bas "gareeb state" me kuch na karo taki bas unko troll kar sako haina?
exactly! It's so frustrating that people here don't even realise the primary consumer of metro. What happened to common sense, God help india.
@@aaryankumar8770are inke hisab se Pune Paris se comparable hai 😂😂
Bgm sounds bit like middle east sand desert
If u find better you can use that
Jai BHARAT MATA KI🇮🇳🙂🙏🚩
What is about Metrolite projects?
Also Their should be Metro Trains on Central n Harbour lines to De-congestion of population in Mumbai..
Bcoz of overcrowding in Mumbai local Trains there should be Fast completion of Metro Trains projects in Mumbai to De-congestion of commuters..
Please tell bhaiya why central government delay delhi alwar and delhi panipat rrts project last 5 years ago
Court ne delhi govt ko hi gaali di h, the share of funds that had to come for rrts from delhi govt, kejriwal uski daru party aur ad chapane m laga tha
@@hiteshadhikari delhi government ne approval ke baad 150 crore de diye hai dono projects ke liye ab central government se hi approval pending hai
There is a difference between Metropolitan city and any city. And population drnsity should be high for any metro rail to work.
population density is good enough for a metro to work in some tier 2 cities like BBSR or Guwahati
Not necessarily
Like Railways, not every line needs to be profitable, its for common public, if it gets built, people WILL use it, slowly the usage will increase and so will the income of that metro
BRTS system should be developed along with every metro system, and should be included in the common payment system for both metro and brts buses.
Where would BRTS lane be placed ???
If there are metro piers on the middle of the road, the roads become congested already, and you want to put BRTS lane in that congested road?
Where will the rest of the public go?
Half the lane on any road is already covered with Shops & Parked Bikes
Nashik,sambhaji nagar
Gaya me metro ki sakth jarurt hai.
Vizag needs metro currently.
Tamil Nadu needs metro in Coimbatore, Madurai, Trichy, Salem, Tirupur, Tirunelveli, Tirupur, Hosur and Pondicherry
😂😂😂shut up
Every citu metro, bcos of high population density. Only this can reduce traffic on city roads, illegal parking, e rikshaw, thela wale, encroachment and even begging, at some point. Log kam honge roads pe, garbage kam hoga, accident kam hoga and aesthetics will increase
Instead of metro within cities we should make metro between to adjacent cities to make travel easy
Bhubaneswar mein metro ki koie jaroorat nahi hey for now
Darbhanga gaya bhagalpur muzaffarpur ka population 5 lakh v nhi hai
We want kharagpur , Asansol, durgapur,tamluk howrah metro ❤🚇
I think you should make your intro faster because it becomes booring (I hope you will take it positively)
4:02 Scandinavian cities ki population density Bharat ke gav aur muhalle se bhi kaam hai 😂😂😂😂😂😂
Very correctly put.
Pr per capita income mumbai se bhi jyada , ye batana bhool gya 😂
@@abhi565bGDP bhi Mumbai ke barabar
As a Gayaite I still not find this feasible.
Inse badha toh Jodhpur aur Kota hi hai 😂
More than 1.5 million population hai
Fr, Kota me metro is actually Worth it. If u wanna know ask me i will explain
@@yuvrajkumar2048 because of coaching centre and students
Jodhpur, Bikaner and Kota. Bikaner is 4th biggest city in Rajasthan
Har rajy ke sehar me metro bana or highway bana koe kuchh bol but jab yahi kam bihar ko milta hai to baki rajy ke log chilmika uthta hai😂😂
Q bhai kya dikkat hai ye sare subodha honge tab na new new company aaiynge logo ko rojgar milega esliye ye sab aana bahut jaruri hai 😢
I was visited Agra Metro and realised it's totally waste of money in present time but if you consider future growth it's good.
No small city don't require metro train but we can connect small city which are near to big city by metro.
For ex:satara which 120 km away from.pune we can connect pune to satara
Gaya muzaffarpur are 100 km from patna
So shouldn't we do what you're suggesting here too?
Ya bas bihar dikh gya
I am from muzaffarpur
I have need muzaffarpur metro
And 5 years baad mila jaye
2031 and 2032 metro kab chalu bahut traffic 2 lakh per day road ki nea
Muzaffarpur fast growth population 15 lakh soon
Bihar government fast growth
Patna and muzaffarpur growh hai bhai ek real such bola
Bullet train ki sabse jyada jarurat
DELHI KOLKATA Route par thi hua ulta
Bhartiya rail ko sabse jyada revenue Delhi railway station milta hai
Modi is from Gujarat.
Rest you can understand
@@Dhruv-Kumarthis is why nagpur is getting so many projects because gadkari himself is from nagpur
Sorry but I don't agree. Mumbai Ahmedabad route is equally needed bullet train if not lesser than many other routes. Mumbai Ahmedabad is one of the busiest route for all mode of transportation and ultimately connecting to delhi so Delhi Mumbai route is also equally busy and important route. Anyways we have to start from one route so not bad choice at all.
Audio is distorted
Small city ko metro honi chahiye tab hi log migration kam karege bade city me and ager ab metro nahi banayi toh future me ye city badi hogi and problem bhi badi ho jayegi iss se accha abhi se future proof bana do 😊. Jaha metro hogi company waha khulegi bhi and bade city par population ka booz kam hoga 😊😊
lol that's not how development works
@@mohitmurmu7824 waise hi work karti hai ager ajj nahi kar paye toh toh future me nahi kar paoge because people mind changes
@@indiantechtraveler dimag se socho dil se nahi, main delhi main rehta hu I know what kind of people travels in metro daily. Transit development ka ek process hota hain jabardasti kuch bhi nahi banana hota. Already India have so many loss making metro projects.
@@mohitmurmu7824 not a bro .. abhi loss making hai iska Matlab ye nahi future me bhi rahega me mumbai me rahta hu mumbai me metro banai nahi gayi ajj local me bohot Jada crowded hai and now condition ye hai ki metro bana nahi pa rahi gov 2014 se koi na koi issue ata hai environmentalist ayege and project rok dege mumbai chod ke maharashtra me other city me metro hai Jo bohot jabar dast work karti hai so hum bogat rahe hai yaha north Indians ko ab samz nahi pa rahe that's why maharashtra ho ya south indian state jada development me focus karte hai baki app samzdar ho ..hope ager apko development nahi karna toh hum karege hamare state city me humko kam se kam centre gov ki permission nahi chshiye humare state ko autonomy de do hum kar dege development like other europian country ki Tarah kyoki iss country me sabke view point alag hai kisi ko development karna hai and kisi ko nahi simple
2:54 correction : har jilla ke andar .......not taluka
Bhai mujaffarpur aur darbhanga mein metro aayegi bhi nahi usse pehle patna mein banegi aur usse pehle Agra Varanasi jaise cities mein
Metros are great but not The Marvel of modern technology and engineering. Small cities are still developing and opportunity for us to experiment and develop the modern transit system. It's so sad that we see a century old transit system as 'The achivement' building track over viaduct or underground when we are going to start thinking beyond this, when we will be think about virtual tracks and self driving gps based carriages when we will study the real time foot fall data, real time signalling. Our whole focus is on physical infrastructure whereas we lag far behind on systematic soft infrastructure.
Bihar ka विकास कोई देखना नही चाहता, बिहार को कुछ भी मिले तो पूरा देश रोने लगता है
Guwahati needs Metro rail.
छोटे शहारो मेट्रो चाहिये
60% of population would not be able to afford ticket for daily commute, and metro like kanpur metro have been made over existing roadways. So people have an option to take metro or cheaper alternatives. It would be very difficult to run profitable metro system with affordable ticketing.
Metro city ko indirectly growth deta hai
Agar city ki growth Hui then Metro automatically financially independent and profitable ho jayega.
@@immortalwarrior2695incorrect metros are mode of public transport, metro bs commute ko easy aur traffic ease krta hai resulting in less carbon footprint, agar metro well connected and strategically plan na ho to people won't use it, it will go in loss and a failure, when we see success of Delhi metro we should also see the example of mono rail in Mumbai.
That's why all the new metro project are made near railway station/bus station and airport. Bcz people will surely use it to bypass city traffic to catch their flights/bus/train
@@ayitya9787acha hua bhopal ka achi planning ki hai station aise jagah jaha log sabse jada jate hai jaise AIIMS bhopal, Rani Kamlapati, MP Nagar yaha to bhar le use karenge log waise hi log yaha metro ka bohot phele se intazar kar rehe hai bas ticket pricing sahi rakhni padegi
Actually no.. it will take a min of 10 years to build a metro and by that time petrol and diesel rates would sky rocket. To travel 1KM in small cities like muz you'd have to pay 20rs, metro currently takes 10rs and might increase to 12-15rs.
And people will start affording it just like they started affording monthly recharges. It's just a matter of convenience.
By that time there will be growth in the cheap road transport not relying on petrol/diesel like electric rikshaw, eBus and sharing ePods. The time and financial investment required for building metro is way much more than any road based transport and the return on investment is less than that of road transport.
Bhubaneswar tier 2 city mey sey top city hey
Haa... Metro hona chahiye
We can combine bus and metro system
For Exampl:-
1)We can have bridges for Bus
2)we can have bus stop on that network/highway
3)the bus stop will be just normal bus stop but they'll have stairs that can help passengers to reach the highway for taking bus and same the passenger who have stop.
Basicaly BRTS system bana dia tumne ( bus rapid transit)
I think nashik me esa banra h..
Ha accha idea h par jab itna pillar vagera bana hi rahe ho elevated section ke liye, joki expensive hota h (not to mention uske liye land bhi aquire kia hoga thoda bahut)
To bus ki jagah metro hi chala do
India ab expert ho chuka in metro ke dabbe banane me, hamare country me kaafi aacha supply chain network ban chuka for metro
What about monorail?
Guwahati badly needs a metro. Buses are always full here. Hv to stand inside them. Cities much smaller hv metro nowadays.
Dunno what govt is doing. Modified the DPR for maybe like 20 times till now. Still no progress.
I still feel our Union & States have wasted money building metros in places like Nagpur, Kanpur, Jaipur, Indore, Kochi etc. Let's assume for a minute that you're right. Still I feel firstly - top 10 metropolitan areas (by GDP and population) should have had a huge network. E.g. Delhi and Mumbai by now should have had 500 km network by now. Bangalore, Kolkata, Chennai at least 450 km. Hyderabad, Pune, Ahemdabad 250 km. Once this is achieved then I am fine with Tier II & III
@@ameyaraomarathe agreed but inn big cities ka jo naam bola unme banri h abhi, to usme time lagega but need abhi h (thoda pehle ban jati to shayad accha hota)
and jab development ho jata h uske baad metro banane me challenges aate h crowded aread etc
Pehle se chote sheher me ban jaye to unke around development hota which is called ToD (Transit oriented development)
@@ameyaraomarathe delhi me current phase se baad almost 500km ho jaegi
Mumbai me local system h to kaam chalra h vaha pe, metro bhi jaroorat h vaha
Baaki ki Cities ka bhi dekhe to jo under construction and approved h unka length kaafi h
Par vahi baat h abhi under construction and planned h, thoda pehle aajati to accha rehta...
These cities are future tier 1 so i don't know how it is a waste of money. More money is wasted on welfare and pension but i don't see anyone complaining about it.
Because you look at the project from current status but not the bigger picture of future growth and expansion
If u start building metro post growth in cities you inc cost by several times and the construction period by several years
Its better to build a line or two in cities and run then for a loss at lower freq for like 5 years and connect larger sections over time and inc freq than wait for the demand to be adequate and then spend more money and waste years building a system
@@hiteshadhikari very well explained 🔥🔥
Mathura me bhi metro honi chahiye
bana do bhai jo hoga dekha jayega
Ye poore scenario ko china se jod k dekhna hi galat he, china me bhi only 7 cities metro profitable run kar rhe hei and 24 cities loss maker hei and govt subsidy par run kar rhe he. We should carefull and avoid this 'Bhed chaal', Apart from this US and Europe's economy was far ahead from us even 100 year back. Most of state govt are under huge amount of loan and in such scenarios taking one more loan for high investment loss making project is not viable for the country and second is metro didn't plan well in second tier cities so far. Downtown should be cover from 1st phase itself.
Jara socho agar metro banega aur wo aas pas ke villages tak jayega to kitni public transport band hogi aur pollution kitna kam ho jayega. Logo ko aasani hogi kahi bhi Jane me.
Metro line har jagah honi chahiye
Guwahati Ma Metro Chalagi kya Thanks 👍👍🙏🎉
Why Nasik and Aurangabad not given metro
Investing in metro than will run on losses in tier 3 cities that have poor quality of healthcare and education is like a poor family buying an expensive car to show off where as their kids struggle for basic nutrition and education or just spending all railway budget vande bharat where are majority of the population suffer to due lack of safety and affordability!
भारत में जितने भी स्टेट है सभी स्टेट हो टाउन से ग्रमीण गांव जोड़ा अच्छा पहल होगा।
Gaya is very crowded.
1.14 sexy trains tbh
This should be implemented in small cities