this is a very good monitor chanel （even its actually not）that lots of people still doesn't recognize ，the review is honest ，good ，clear. You also learn a thing or two . Thats why everytime when I see his video pop up I just instantly click 👍🏻 blind😆😆
I am running the Gigabyte M32U as my main monitor and have mixed feelings about it. I originally wanted the M28U but it was sold out everywhere and at the time so was every other 28'' 4k 144hz monitor that was at msrp in my price range of $900. I originally purchased it for my PS5, but the console lives in my bedroom now hooked up to my new 55" $600 Hisense U7G. Anyways back to the M32U, running this panel with my set up is absolutely amazing in cinematic games! Horizon Zero Dawn, Cyberpunk,Rdr2,Borderlands and racing games! Problem is i love high fps in my favorite competitive games and right now my specs simply cant push this panel to a constant 144hz and frame dips get you killed...My pc is no slouch either running a 5800x @4850ghz and fully overclocked gigabyte gaming oc 6800xt... Originally i was going to sell off my old monitor and use the $450 towards the cost of this one. ive since pulled it off the market and am gonna keep it. As much as i love 4k gaming, my 1440p 270hz Acer Nitro XV272U Xbmiipruzx is gonna stay my main squeeze for a few more years. I think i can get around $700 back for my M32U so its gonna go up for sale locally incase anyone is interested in it :) (pdx).
Definitely my favorite monitor so far. I love the colors and performance is better than my 27 inch Asus monitor I've been using for 2 years now. I haven't had any issues with it so far. 4k at 32 inches is amazing, I can't go back to using a 27 inch display after upgrading.
I once tried the LG 4K 144Hz and had the same experience. Chose the LG 1440p 144Hz at the end for more stable FPS and im very happy with it. Nice review! Im hoping the Mobiuz will be great. We have their 24inch FullHD 144Hz Monitor and its awesome!
Until GPU prices come down, it's so hard to consider 4K atm... I see you seem to be sticking to the Air75. How does it stack up against the streak65 performance wise?
it's the year 2077 ASUS just released thier A10k10k monitor with a 10k resolution and 10.000Hz but a new challenger appears Zowie XL2566K 360Hz DyAc+ it's finally time. I can finally dump on the noobs once again.
Can you use the REC.2020 color space in your test instead of the Adobe RGB or DCI P3 pls, P3 is only used in cinemas while REC 2020 is the true home HDR futureproofed standard.
Hello dear Bijan love your content dear brother and wish you Happy New Year in advance! Just a question though, as a photographer who wants to do personal photo editing and video with high color accuracy (IPS panel), But also want to play games at night 144-240hz, 1440p resolution, with so low respond time as possible or image clarity (the ufo thingy), what would you recommend? Price range 600-850 usd All the best.
Most reviews seem to think that just because the screen does 4K, then all games has to be run at 4K. The point with 4K is you'll have an awesome experience when using the computer for work, browsing, video/photo editing etc. Then play games at 4K if your GPU can push it and run the rest on 1440p. 1440p on a 4K 32" monitor still looks fantastic. Also, a lot of games don't need to be run at 144+ fps. If it's a FPS, sure. But a lot of other games there won't be any difference between 90 fps or 150 fps.
@@andrewc5202 In theory yes, but in practical terms it will be difficult to see much of a difference. Games in themselves are usually a big palette of colors, textures, lighting effects etc. moving fairly fast. This in term means it's much more difficult to even see a "lower quality", than if you compare it to a non-moving image, reading text or similar. I've played 1440p games on both a 27" 1440p monitor as well as on a 32" 4K monitor, and unless you really try to look for the difference you won't notice. Of course 4K gaming will be more crisp, but you'd be surpriced in how many games the difference is very very subtle, if the 1440p is running with maxed out settings.
3090 owner here, ultrawide is the "ultra" way to go, any more than that and you start to consider switching off some settings. It's sharp enough that you can turn everything on with some anti aliasing, and it's great plus field of vision is wider. Plus it's amazing how you can watch movies without black bars.
It's shitty for any work with documents/code though, the kind of application where you benefit more from the height of the screen instead of width and the reason I find ultrawide useless for me
@@deedoodeedoo6382 I understand your point. I agree that ultrawide isn't easy to get used to taking full advantage of it. It's easy to maximize a single program and have empty spaces on either side instead of housing something else, a second software or something.
@@adnanerochdi6982 Thing is, the 32" 4k is just lovely for those. You can comfortably place 2 programs next to each other and have an overview of much more code vertically in both of those programs. I gave away my ultrawide to my aunt, since it was useless to me like that, too low height. If you don't need the height as much, since I'll agree my usage is specific, ultrawides are fine too
@@deedoodeedoo6382 I think you're talking about the 34" ultrawides? You're right, as I have one, the height is super spacious for a 1440p but I have the monitor on an arm so I just bring it closer, I love it for gaming tho. However I can imagine the 38" to be great and you may absolutely love them, just your wallet may want to devorce you.
Yes please, 40-43" and i'll bite 32" still has to deal with scaling. I've had a 40" 4K 10-bit 4:4:4 chroma VA monitor since 2014 ($550 ordered from eBay via Korea) and no matter what i setup for clients or friends it's not as productive or immersive as what i have. It's essentially 4x1080p monitors stuck together, but much more flexible than multiple 1440p monitors. I have better than 20/20 vision (it's common) and it's very hard to notice between AAx2 and simple AA, although in certain shooters where you have limited scope 8xAA still helps. And even with just a Vega56 (flashed and OCed etc) I can play AAA modern games with medium/high and stay pegged at 60fps.
Thank you for this review, I've found it to be very helpful. I'm about to purchase this monitor but I would also like to calibrate it myself like you did, although I know nothing on the subject (what extra tools I need to purchase, what software to use, how the calibration is done, how to apply the calibration changes etc...) - can you point me to a good "how to" video tutorial on that? ^_^
Seems like the one review I watched it's actually worse in every way, It's really dim and doesn't have as much of a color range as this one. HDR is also worse on the BenQ because it doesn't even reach the 600 nit brightness that's advertised. There is a video about it on Techtesters channel, Kind of disappointing since that one is going to cost around $1100. Sure the BenQ has speakers but I would rather have better colors and Uniformity than just some speakers that make up a chunkier bottom.
@@armen1136 Ya, saw the review. Disappointed too since AU Optronics is a subsidiary of BenQ, thus thought BenQ would have better bin; turned out to be the opposite.
Well I have the ex3210u and it is stuning, its low brightness can be an issue only if you use the display in a very bright and sunny environment. I don't understand why people always want to kill their eyes with brightness, moreover more brightness means more noticeable ips glow. On my panel almost none glow !!!!! The HDR is so beautiful, tested so far with GOW, Cyberpunk and Elden Ring. Ok it's not real HDR, but like PG32uq or MPG321UR-QD which also are 600 nits so.....And what I like on the Mobiuz is having 3 different HDR modes which let you choose the one you prefer. If you managed to buy the mobiuz at 1089 € like me then go for it, because over 1300 € like today on Amazon is overpriced, I admit.
Great review. Been looking for a good flat screen for 4k video editing (GoPro 10) and game play. Been looking at playing Star citizen for awhile now. Heard there were still a lot of problems. What's your experience with the game?
You should try 27" 4k, now that looks even better than 32" for sharpness. Oh and the PS5 doesn't really do 4k most of the time it just upscales everything in games. Maybe the 30fps mode is near 4k on some games.
I don't know if I should get the ASUS 27" ROG Strix XG27AQM, Samsung G7 27" or Acer XB273U GX 27". There hasn't been a lot of reviews for the ASUS 27" ROG Strix XG27AQM, and I don't know why. It looks like a beast! I mainly play CSGO, but also other games like RD2, Battlefield, CoD and Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020. My Specs: AOC 24G2U 1080p 144Hz AMD Ryzen 3900X - NZXT Kraken X73 ASUS Strix RTX 2080 Super 8GB MSI MAG X570 Tomahawk WiFi 32GB G.Skill TridentZ RGB 3600MHz C16 1TB Samsung EVO 970 Corsair RM850x NZXT H710i Black/Red
hi, can you do a review on the benq ex2780q ? I know it's not a recent monitor, but I couldn't find many professional reviews like you do on this monitor
hi bijam i would like to ask if you could test another 4k 144hz its the LC-Power LC-M27-4K-UHD-144, the cheapest 4k 144hz monitor here in germany at the moment, would like to know (and probably many others too) if the cheapest is actually ok
many of the consoles compute at 2560 resolution. they output 3840 resolution, but that is produced by upscaling 2560 image, in 3:2 ratio. this is because PlayStation 5 is incapable of 2560 output, it only provides 1920 and 3840 output.
Hey man, I got a quick question but first of all I'd like to tell you that I really really enjoy watching your reviews. I like your humor and also they are so we'll made and cut together. I'm currently on 144hz 1440p but I'm finding my way into competitive gaming. (R6,Valorant,...) So I want to buy myself a second monitor with 240hz. The BenQ 2546k was always my favorite but when I tried ULMB on my current monitor I was getting a headache. That sucks, because it's the only real standout for the Zowie. So I was wondering if you could recommend any 240hz monitor to use without ULMB or if the zowie should still be the go to. I really liked g sync on my monitor cause I like it when its very smooth. Thanks in advance!
Would you recommend this monitor for ps5/xbox series x? I do play all sorts of games but do love apex legends so i want something that Will really bring the new consoles to life but also want to be competitive in fps
4K gaming on PS5 isn't really 4K native gaming, I hope you understand that much. People are throwing 4K gaming left and right without really knowing what it should mean. 90% of the games that run "4K60" on PS5 are actually well below the 2160p signal that is considered true 4K.
Unless I missed it, I want to, in the near future, get this monitor based on another channel's upload of this product. My question is, if it hasn't been spelled out for me already, I want this to play and get the most out of the "optimized" games on my Xbox Series X, would this monitor be what I'm looking for?
@@myytti16 PS5 and Xbox can't reach 120 fps on 4k anyways. You want 4k and 120 fps on the UI? Get a PC if you want to game on 4k 120 fps. UI content 60 fps vs 120 fps doesn't matter anyways, TH-cam Nefflix etc is all capped at 60 fps.
Is this monitor ok when have a pc with Intel i9 9900K combined with a Asus ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2080 Ti OC card, even if I have to lower the gaming resolution down to 1080/1440p?
First of all this work perfectly fine with E-Sport gaming, 99% of these so called Esport wannabe pros / morons couldn't hit a headshot if their life depended on it while using a 360HZ monitor and they also couldn't even tell the difference between 120hz and 360hz.
Well I have the ex3210u and it is stuning, its low brightness can be an issue only if you use the display in a very bright and sunny environment. I don't understand why people always want to kill their eyes with brightness, moreover more brightness means more noticeable ips glow. On my panel almost none glow !!!!! The HDR is so beautiful, tested so far with GOW, Cyberpunk and Elden Ring. Ok it's not real HDR, but like PG32uq or MPG321UR-QD which also are 600 nits so.....And what I like on the Mobiuz is having 3 different HDR modes which let you choose the one you prefer. If you managed to buy the mobiuz at 1089 € like me then go for it, because over 1300 € like today on Amazon is overpriced, I admit.
valid opinions, but you really need a 3080 bare minimum to properly drive and review a cinematic game. PS: I didnt have that issue with rainbow six, and I game on a 4k 48" c1 with a 3080. 3090 if you really want to show off the monitor. Also, DLSS on quality > any anti-aliasing. It looks better than native 4k. Try read dead redemption 2 for example.
Monitor really isn't worth it just because the tech to push isn't really there yet, getting closer but not quite. Maybe if you're running dual 3080's but if you're playing high end games on max settings, you're not likely to hit 144hz on a single card rig. So right there you're going to need to give somewhere, dropping the resolution wouldn't make sense as then immediately what was the point of 4k so you're left with compromising on graphics which then leaves the question of why'd you spend all that money on a beast graphics card. So yeah the monitor is cool but we're still a couple card cycles away from this purchase making any sense at that price point.
You don't need to hit 144 frames. It just feels a lot smoother, faster and more responsive than if you were to game on a 4k 60 hz monitor. Especially if your monitor has a certified G-sync module built in.
Damn 110 fps at 4k on ultra setting is fucking impressive. My 3070 can only hit around 70 to 80 fps on med to high setting. I game on my acer predator x27 4k monitor and it still feels buttery smooth.
If I'm going to go 4K/cinematic side rather than performance, it better be full on looks. Unfortunately will have to wait for a glossy screen that looks SO MUCH better than these matte 'anti-glare'. Manufacturers refuse to adopt glossy even though clarity is better for gaming. Hoping Eve pushes the market in that direction with their version
900.00? Damn. Thats expensive imo and unnecessary. 1440p 144hz is where it's at, you can buy three 1440p 144z monitors for that price and have a triple setup, and ultimately a better experience.
Can you use the REC.2020 color space in your test instead of the Adobe RGB or DCI P3 pls, P3 is only used in cinemas while REC 2020 is the true home HDR futureproofed standard.
this is a very good monitor chanel （even its actually not）that lots of people still doesn't recognize ，the review is honest ，good ，clear. You also learn a thing or two . Thats why everytime when I see his video pop up I just instantly click 👍🏻 blind😆😆
One of the best reviews for this monitor. Well planned content structure and more than enough information to make a decision. Thanks!
msi needs someone to give their monitors proper names...
I am running the Gigabyte M32U as my main monitor and have mixed feelings about it. I originally wanted the M28U but it was sold out everywhere and at the time so was every other 28'' 4k 144hz monitor that was at msrp in my price range of $900. I originally purchased it for my PS5, but the console lives in my bedroom now hooked up to my new 55" $600 Hisense U7G. Anyways back to the M32U, running this panel with my set up is absolutely amazing in cinematic games! Horizon Zero Dawn, Cyberpunk,Rdr2,Borderlands and racing games! Problem is i love high fps in my favorite competitive games and right now my specs simply cant push this panel to a constant 144hz and frame dips get you killed...My pc is no slouch either running a 5800x @4850ghz and fully overclocked gigabyte gaming oc 6800xt...
Originally i was going to sell off my old monitor and use the $450 towards the cost of this one. ive since pulled it off the market and am gonna keep it. As much as i love 4k gaming, my 1440p 270hz Acer Nitro XV272U Xbmiipruzx is gonna stay my main squeeze for a few more years. I think i can get around $700 back for my M32U so its gonna go up for sale locally incase anyone is interested in it :) (pdx).
What is it that you don’t like about the gigabyte m32u?
How come you don't/didn't just play competitive games at 1080p?
Definitely my favorite monitor so far. I love the colors and performance is better than my 27 inch Asus monitor I've been using for 2 years now. I haven't had any issues with it so far. 4k at 32 inches is amazing, I can't go back to using a 27 inch display after upgrading.
Lesss go new video
Letsssss go favorite TH-camr upload at 3:53am
No sleep ;)
I once tried the LG 4K 144Hz and had the same experience. Chose the LG 1440p 144Hz at the end for more stable FPS and im very happy with it. Nice review! Im hoping the Mobiuz will be great. We have their 24inch FullHD 144Hz Monitor and its awesome!
itz the best ...love this guy with his pro gaming vibes
Until GPU prices come down, it's so hard to consider 4K atm...
I see you seem to be sticking to the Air75. How does it stack up against the streak65 performance wise?
bijan caught in 4k😳
Setup / room tour video when? Keep up the good work mate, great video!
As soon as I move ;) Whenever that is...
it's the year 2077
ASUS just released thier A10k10k monitor with a 10k resolution and 10.000Hz
but a new challenger appears
Zowie XL2566K
360Hz DyAc+
it's finally time. I can finally dump on the noobs once again.
😂
Can you use the REC.2020 color space in your test instead of the Adobe RGB or DCI P3 pls, P3 is only used in cinemas while REC 2020 is the true home HDR futureproofed standard.
I really like mind. It is a little bright in a dark room. Just a little and well within usable limits.
I'm glad that 32 inch 144hz 4k monitors are out BUT DAMN the price is totally crazy high! ;(
Hello dear Bijan love your content dear brother and wish you Happy New Year in advance!
Just a question though, as a photographer who wants to do personal photo editing and video with high color accuracy (IPS panel),
But also want to play games at night 144-240hz, 1440p resolution, with so low respond time as possible or image clarity (the ufo thingy), what would you recommend?
Price range 600-850 usd
All the best.
buy this $1,121.27 monitor lol
Most reviews seem to think that just because the screen does 4K, then all games has to be run at 4K. The point with 4K is you'll have an awesome experience when using the computer for work, browsing, video/photo editing etc. Then play games at 4K if your GPU can push it and run the rest on 1440p. 1440p on a 4K 32" monitor still looks fantastic. Also, a lot of games don't need to be run at 144+ fps. If it's a FPS, sure. But a lot of other games there won't be any difference between 90 fps or 150 fps.
playing a game at 1440p on a 4K monitor will look considerably worse than it would on a 144op monitor.
@@andrewc5202 In theory yes, but in practical terms it will be difficult to see much of a difference. Games in themselves are usually a big palette of colors, textures, lighting effects etc. moving fairly fast. This in term means it's much more difficult to even see a "lower quality", than if you compare it to a non-moving image, reading text or similar. I've played 1440p games on both a 27" 1440p monitor as well as on a 32" 4K monitor, and unless you really try to look for the difference you won't notice. Of course 4K gaming will be more crisp, but you'd be surpriced in how many games the difference is very very subtle, if the 1440p is running with maxed out settings.
No.
Scaling is a thing and its terrible.
@@mlykke Not in theory.
In practice.
Try it.
I play Doom Eternal on a 4K 144Hz monitor at Ultra Settings and I still get 200+ FPS.
The experience is unreal.
It's Unreal or Doom, I'am confused.
4K is a blessing and a curse.
Once you truely experience it, everything else is just worse.
3090 owner here, ultrawide is the "ultra" way to go, any more than that and you start to consider switching off some settings. It's sharp enough that you can turn everything on with some anti aliasing, and it's great plus field of vision is wider. Plus it's amazing how you can watch movies without black bars.
It's shitty for any work with documents/code though, the kind of application where you benefit more from the height of the screen instead of width and the reason I find ultrawide useless for me
@@deedoodeedoo6382 I understand your point. I agree that ultrawide isn't easy to get used to taking full advantage of it. It's easy to maximize a single program and have empty spaces on either side instead of housing something else, a second software or something.
@@adnanerochdi6982 Thing is, the 32" 4k is just lovely for those. You can comfortably place 2 programs next to each other and have an overview of much more code vertically in both of those programs. I gave away my ultrawide to my aunt, since it was useless to me like that, too low height. If you don't need the height as much, since I'll agree my usage is specific, ultrawides are fine too
@@deedoodeedoo6382 I think you're talking about the 34" ultrawides? You're right, as I have one, the height is super spacious for a 1440p but I have the monitor on an arm so I just bring it closer, I love it for gaming tho. However I can imagine the 38" to be great and you may absolutely love them, just your wallet may want to devorce you.
Yes please, 40-43" and i'll bite
32" still has to deal with scaling. I've had a 40" 4K 10-bit 4:4:4 chroma VA monitor since 2014 ($550 ordered from eBay via Korea) and no matter what i setup for clients or friends it's not as productive or immersive as what i have. It's essentially 4x1080p monitors stuck together, but much more flexible than multiple 1440p monitors.
I have better than 20/20 vision (it's common) and it's very hard to notice between AAx2 and simple AA, although in certain shooters where you have limited scope 8xAA still helps. And even with just a Vega56 (flashed and OCed etc) I can play AAA modern games with medium/high and stay pegged at 60fps.
Its 3:53 am gere and im watching you and i like it
Thank you for this review, I've found it to be very helpful.
I'm about to purchase this monitor but I would also like to calibrate it myself like you did, although I know nothing on the subject (what extra tools I need to purchase, what software to use, how the calibration is done, how to apply the calibration changes etc...) - can you point me to a good "how to" video tutorial on that? ^_^
BENQ MOBIUZ EX3210U next month I guess?
Please do some comparison with MSI MPG321UR-QD. Looking forward to it~
Seems like the one review I watched it's actually worse in every way, It's really dim and doesn't have as much of a color range as this one. HDR is also worse on the BenQ because it doesn't even reach the 600 nit brightness that's advertised. There is a video about it on Techtesters channel, Kind of disappointing since that one is going to cost around $1100. Sure the BenQ has speakers but I would rather have better colors and Uniformity than just some speakers that make up a chunkier bottom.
@@armen1136 Ya, saw the review. Disappointed too since AU Optronics is a subsidiary of BenQ, thus thought BenQ would have better bin; turned out to be the opposite.
I too want benq mobiuz ex3210u reviewed by him
Well I have the ex3210u and it is stuning, its low brightness can be an issue only if you use the display in a very bright and sunny environment. I don't understand why people always want to kill their eyes with brightness, moreover more brightness means more noticeable ips glow. On my panel almost none glow !!!!! The HDR is so beautiful, tested so far with GOW, Cyberpunk and Elden Ring. Ok it's not real HDR, but like PG32uq or MPG321UR-QD which also are 600 nits so.....And what I like on the Mobiuz is having 3 different HDR modes which let you choose the one you prefer. If you managed to buy the mobiuz at 1089 € like me then go for it, because over 1300 € like today on Amazon is overpriced, I admit.
Great review. Been looking for a good flat screen for 4k video editing (GoPro 10) and game play. Been looking at playing Star citizen for awhile now. Heard there were still a lot of problems. What's your experience with the game?
You should try 27" 4k, now that looks even better than 32" for sharpness. Oh and the PS5 doesn't really do 4k most of the time it just upscales everything in games. Maybe the 30fps mode is near 4k on some games.
Most PS5 games are rendered in 1440p and upscaled to 4K
Great review! Would you use this over your 38" LG? I have the 38" LG as well but often think I wound prefer the higher pixel density.
I don't know if I should get the ASUS 27" ROG Strix XG27AQM, Samsung G7 27" or Acer XB273U GX 27". There hasn't been a lot of reviews for the ASUS 27" ROG Strix XG27AQM, and I don't know why. It looks like a beast! I mainly play CSGO, but also other games like RD2, Battlefield, CoD and Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020.
My Specs:
AOC 24G2U 1080p 144Hz
AMD Ryzen 3900X
- NZXT Kraken X73
ASUS Strix RTX 2080 Super 8GB
MSI MAG X570 Tomahawk WiFi
32GB G.Skill TridentZ RGB 3600MHz C16
1TB Samsung EVO 970
Corsair RM850x
NZXT H710i Black/Red
What’s the new Mobiuz 4K monitor called they are bringing out? :)
hi, can you do a review on the benq ex2780q ? I know it's not a recent monitor, but I couldn't find many professional reviews like you do on this monitor
i had it. good solid monitor
hi bijam
i would like to ask if you could test another 4k 144hz
its the LC-Power LC-M27-4K-UHD-144, the cheapest 4k 144hz monitor here in germany at the moment, would like to know (and probably many others too) if the cheapest is actually ok
Pretty goooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooood
nanoIPS + QuantumDot + MiniLED = Endgame
Acer Predator X32 FP says hello~
Wow perfect monitor for my 3080 + 5900x.
Hi, nice review thanks a lot. So this monitor or PG32UQ which has true 10 bits panel ?
many of the consoles compute at 2560 resolution. they output 3840 resolution, but that is produced by upscaling 2560 image, in 3:2 ratio. this is because PlayStation 5 is incapable of 2560 output, it only provides 1920 and 3840 output.
Which keyboard you got here? Looks hella nice
Hey man, I got a quick question but first of all I'd like to tell you that I really really enjoy watching your reviews. I like your humor and also they are so we'll made and cut together.
I'm currently on 144hz 1440p but I'm finding my way into competitive gaming. (R6,Valorant,...)
So I want to buy myself a second monitor with 240hz.
The BenQ 2546k was always my favorite but when I tried ULMB on my current monitor I was getting a headache. That sucks, because it's the only real standout for the Zowie. So I was wondering if you could recommend any 240hz monitor to use without ULMB or if the zowie should still be the go to. I really liked g sync on my monitor cause I like it when its very smooth.
Thanks in advance!
If you don't care about the ULMB bc u can't use it you should get the MSI Optix MAG251RX, if you want to go cheap or the Nitro XV252Q
Would you recommend this monitor for ps5/xbox series x? I do play all sorts of games but do love apex legends so i want something that Will really bring the new consoles to life but also want to be competitive in fps
4K gaming on PS5 isn't really 4K native gaming, I hope you understand that much. People are throwing 4K gaming left and right without really knowing what it should mean. 90% of the games that run "4K60" on PS5 are actually well below the 2160p signal that is considered true 4K.
ولكن تستطيع تشغيل 4k حقيقي ولكن بمعدل اطارات 30-45 hz
Unless I missed it, I want to, in the near future, get this monitor based on another channel's upload of this product. My question is, if it hasn't been spelled out for me already, I want this to play and get the most out of the "optimized" games on my Xbox Series X, would this monitor be what I'm looking for?
NICE
do games look pixelated if we sit close to the monitor...
Hey Bijan, what's the KM you use?
Bijan, please review the Dell S2722DGM. Just want your thoughts as there aren’t a lot of competitive VA curved panels.
With HDMI 2.1 being a joke now can you play "4k 120hz" with PS5 and Xbox Series X with this monitor or does it lock 120hz mode to 1080p input?
PS5 and Xbox can't reach 120 fps on 4k anyways
@@Verition well true but they reach higher than 1080p 120hz and for example UI and text in 4K is so much better than 1080p.
@@myytti16 PS5 and Xbox can't reach 120 fps on 4k anyways. You want 4k and 120 fps on the UI?
Get a PC if you want to game on 4k 120 fps. UI content 60 fps vs 120 fps doesn't matter anyways, TH-cam Nefflix etc is all capped at 60 fps.
@@myytti16 PC wont even do 120 fps un ultra still have to turn the settings down to hit the sweet spot
@@rochester3 I am well aware of the limitations that PS5 and Xbox Series X have. I have both and I watch Digital Foundry regularly.
Hello, thanks for examination. What about IPS Glow?
Good monitor but pricing is not great. I will probably go with Aorus which is £150 less and offers the same 144hz 4k
What did you use to calibrate this monitor?
@Bijan Jamshidi Ben trying to get this monitor for the last couple weeks do you have a legit link to where you can purchase this monitor?
between acer's 390hz and zowie's xl2546, which do you prefer for csgo competition?
acer 390hz not that good imo xv252qf . i went back for benq xl2546
Are you covering any 2k 360hz monitor that has been announced on ces?
Is this monitor ok when have a pc with Intel i9 9900K combined with a Asus ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2080 Ti OC card, even if I have to lower the gaming resolution down to 1080/1440p?
Let's go
Hold On.. Wasn't the PS5 supposed to handle 4k @120hz for Warzone?
Soo...what space game are you playing in this ?
3080 user. How would you compare lg 38gn950 -b and this in terms of image. Lg is more expensive than this
Filming this one with my iPhone the whole display seem to have a slight red tint. Any hints?
This was optimized for X box Series x?
What's overdrive and backlight strobing ?
Does this monitor have pixel cleaning?
I'm assuming that it has hdmi 2.1 due to the fact that you added the ps5 to the video
bijan ive found this monitor and cant seem to find any reviews on youtube can youreview it or atleast look at it the asus rog strix xg349c
Can usb-c connect external headphone to output audio source?
so is this my new second monitor? :D
What's stupid is that it doesn't have HDMI 2.1. The Series X can do 4k at 120hz but only via HDMI 2.1...
Can you do review about Benq Zowie xl2411K ?
Hi, need help. Need to know if the monitor have pbp feature?
First of all this work perfectly fine with E-Sport gaming, 99% of these so called Esport wannabe pros / morons couldn't hit a headshot if their life depended on it while using a 360HZ monitor and they also couldn't even tell the difference between 120hz and 360hz.
How to calibrate this one with a mac via Spyder etc?
Is the g7a better?
This monitor might be the one .
Is this monitor good for PS4 pro?
It should be, It works great on the PS5 and Series X. So it shouldn't have any problems there.
This or Asus VG28UQL1 ?
if it's really that awesome the guy who sells it in Germany first may make a nice profit. It's not listed in Germany nore in Austria
It was listed on Amazon for a short time. There were a few units shipped from there as well. But yeah, availability remains poor.
Now it is :)
@@lukegaming1735 ty for the notice 😀
Who makes the actual panel itself? LG?
I'm unsure
AU Optronics, same as Asus PG32UQ
4K at 27'' is outdated but 32'' is the new sweet spot ! but i still prefer my ultrawide 3440x1440, 120 hz
I haven't used 27 inch 4K, but I like 27 inch monitors more so I bet I'll like that more.
I'm confused between this and Benq mobiuz ex3210u. please help me out
BenQ review soon
Well I have the ex3210u and it is stuning, its low brightness can be an issue only if you use the display in a very bright and sunny environment. I don't understand why people always want to kill their eyes with brightness, moreover more brightness means more noticeable ips glow. On my panel almost none glow !!!!! The HDR is so beautiful, tested so far with GOW, Cyberpunk and Elden Ring. Ok it's not real HDR, but like PG32uq or MPG321UR-QD which also are 600 nits so.....And what I like on the Mobiuz is having 3 different HDR modes which let you choose the one you prefer. If you managed to buy the mobiuz at 1089 € like me then go for it, because over 1300 € like today on Amazon is overpriced, I admit.
I want a 4k 144hz so bad and I'm not a gamer actually
Why would anyone play fps at 32in. Good for Skyrim tho
valid opinions, but you really need a 3080 bare minimum to properly drive and review a cinematic game. PS: I didnt have that issue with rainbow six, and I game on a 4k 48" c1 with a 3080.
3090 if you really want to show off the monitor. Also, DLSS on quality > any anti-aliasing. It looks better than native 4k. Try read dead redemption 2 for example.
hes getting paid to say good things about the monitor so you think he gives 2 fawks about what gpu you should use lol
Next benq 32 4k 144 don't forget samsung g7 4k 28 inch 144hz
What about gigabyte m27q
How many gbits is the hdmi ports?
it's the full 48GB, and has VRR support.
Monitor really isn't worth it just because the tech to push isn't really there yet, getting closer but not quite. Maybe if you're running dual 3080's but if you're playing high end games on max settings, you're not likely to hit 144hz on a single card rig. So right there you're going to need to give somewhere, dropping the resolution wouldn't make sense as then immediately what was the point of 4k so you're left with compromising on graphics which then leaves the question of why'd you spend all that money on a beast graphics card. So yeah the monitor is cool but we're still a couple card cycles away from this purchase making any sense at that price point.
You can't dual anything but 3090. And newer games don't support and will not support SLI at all.
You don't need to hit 144 frames. It just feels a lot smoother, faster and more responsive than if you were to game on a 4k 60 hz monitor. Especially if your monitor has a certified G-sync module built in.
@@kickassguy211 on most games with 3090 on ultra settings and 4k, you never stay above 110 fps
Damn 110 fps at 4k on ultra setting is fucking impressive. My 3070 can only hit around 70 to 80 fps on med to high setting. I game on my acer predator x27 4k monitor and it still feels buttery smooth.
@@kickassguy211 theirs only certain games that hit 95 to 120fps on ultra like dirt 4
new Sub Bijan jan
Bijan problems, am I right?
😂
@@BijanJamshidi I use crosshairs in Golf Rival on my S10+ phone. XD
Of course it ran 250 fps on that game.. It does not seem to be graphically advanced from what I saw on the video..
If I'm going to go 4K/cinematic side rather than performance, it better be full on looks. Unfortunately will have to wait for a glossy screen that looks SO MUCH better than these matte 'anti-glare'. Manufacturers refuse to adopt glossy even though clarity is better for gaming. Hoping Eve pushes the market in that direction with their version
Id rather Buy an Oled C1 for a couple bucks more
This or ben q mobiuz 32
I'd rather get an LG OLED
yeah this guy is getting paid to say good things about msi
We need to stop selling r6 siege as an esports title, at this point the only ones that actually believe in that are ubi themselves
i have the same monitor at home.i run it with an rtx 3080 rog strix oc and i9 9900k and 32gb gskill 3600mhz
The PS4 Pro has been doing 4k/4k checkerboard AAA gaming for the longest. The PS5 shouldn't be a surprise.
900.00? Damn. Thats expensive imo and unnecessary. 1440p 144hz is where it's at, you can buy three 1440p 144z monitors for that price and have a triple setup, and ultimately a better experience.
1.
2
@@BijanJamshidi Lets goooooo watched it before you did
Why even bother including USB 2.0 ports.
Who cares.
Can you use the REC.2020 color space in your test instead of the Adobe RGB or DCI P3 pls, P3 is only used in cinemas while REC 2020 is the true home HDR futureproofed standard.
HV you purchased any monitor