Damn if Harry Armstrong is still there with Port’s pick, they would be mad not to consider drafting him especially with his ability to take contested marks. Only issue is that would mean port will not look to reinvent how they move the ball inside 50 and simply bomb it in as usual.
Big fan of Kayle Gerreyn. Think he has as high of an upside as any of the talls in this draft. Think he'd be talked about way more if he was playing in VIC. Certainly isn't a safe pick but I reckon he is worth the risk.
@@Benny71453 yeah I rate him highly! Agree with your takes there! Maybe only question would be actual position at AFL, probably won’t play ruck so will be a full time fwd. has a lot of attributes though
I find it hard to believe Harry Armstrong will slide that far, if he doesn't go late top 10, I think he we be in the next few picks. Key FWD's don't grow on trees, I would like him at 10 or 11, not sure if he last that long though, we seriously need to replace Jack Riewoldt. Jeremy Cameron was a low disposal player for the first few years, which is who Lloyd compared him to not sure if his talking up his Haileybury college boy.
@@Aka_daka yeah that’s absolutely fair, I think needs will mean that he goes earlier. This video is just me purely ranking the players as I would pick them. I’ll do a mock in the coming weeks and we’ll get down to where they go 😀
We got Lefau and Bauer playing well and hopefully Lynch for 1-2 years. I think we can wait till next year for a forward. Armstrong isn't worth top 10, whilst his stats are good he has had the best midfield feeding him the ball in the top team which is something to consider.
Reckon in the draft he's top 10 based on club need - Richmond, Melbourne, or St Kilda will grab him somewhere in that block of picks they control between 5 and 10. And it'll be an interesting bit of brinkmanship as to just how high he goes. Will Melbourne pull the trigger on him at 5 if one of FOS, Jagga, Langford, Lalor, Draper or Smillie is available? Likewise, will Richmond pounce at 6 if the Dees take the midfield option? But on a talent ranking basis, its a fair call that this year's midfield crop get ahead.
@@bobcat718 Fair call. And thats the difficulty Richmond will face in allocating their bounty of draft picks. Would you rather Armstrong at 6, or risk him going to St Kilda with the next two picks or even Melbourne at 9? That would almost certainly leave the Tigers needing to take a tall forward at 10 or 11. The worst case scenario could be Melbourne and St Kilda take both Armstrong and Shanahan off the market with those picks. Not saying they're the best players, but its based on need. Chances are they'll both look at landing a midfielder and KPP with their 2 top 10 picks. I can't help but wonder if Richmond are still talking to North about a pick swap for #2 to get around this and land the best 2 mids, Armstrong at 6, and still be the race for Trainor, Travaglia or Berry. Its such a strong draft hand they've got.
Everytime I see the Whitlock boys they remind me of the King brothers. For mine, that makes me concerned about their physicality as I think the King brothers really struggle with that side of the game.
@@chriskelly9476 hearing about concussion problems, since we traded away our late picks that tells me we may not go after him, unless we rookie list him if he doesn’t get drafted
@@richardbehan8118 no I’m definitely not saying that. I think because he’s a small fwd there are several teams interested. This is just my rankings, and I have him around 15. Btw I’m a massive fan. Just have some other mids ahead that not all clubs would.
Brilliant analysis…spread the word so Dylan gets the credit he richly deserves with subscribers
@@jtiger1062 peace my friend 🙏
Ripper series! Keep em coming!
When do you post Part 3: 31-45 ranked players?
Love your analysis
Thank you 🙏
I’m kinda disappointed that the draft has reduced in size recently. But I think a big part of that is attributable to the reduced list sizes 😊
Would love to See Gerryn in the Richmond Colours and Jack Whitlock
Damn if Harry Armstrong is still there with Port’s pick, they would be mad not to consider drafting him especially with his ability to take contested marks.
Only issue is that would mean port will not look to reinvent how they move the ball inside 50 and simply bomb it in as usual.
Big fan of Kayle Gerreyn. Think he has as high of an upside as any of the talls in this draft. Think he'd be talked about way more if he was playing in VIC.
Certainly isn't a safe pick but I reckon he is worth the risk.
@@Benny71453 yeah I rate him highly! Agree with your takes there! Maybe only question would be actual position at AFL, probably won’t play ruck so will be a full time fwd. has a lot of attributes though
I find it hard to believe Harry Armstrong will slide that far, if he doesn't go late top 10, I think he we be in the next few picks.
Key FWD's don't grow on trees, I would like him at 10 or 11, not sure if he last that long though, we seriously need to replace Jack Riewoldt.
Jeremy Cameron was a low disposal player for the first few years, which is who Lloyd compared him to not sure if his talking up his Haileybury college boy.
@@Aka_daka yeah that’s absolutely fair, I think needs will mean that he goes earlier. This video is just me purely ranking the players as I would pick them. I’ll do a mock in the coming weeks and we’ll get down to where they go 😀
We got Lefau and Bauer playing well and hopefully Lynch for 1-2 years.
I think we can wait till next year for a forward. Armstrong isn't worth top 10, whilst his stats are good he has had the best midfield feeding him the ball in the top team which is something to consider.
Reckon in the draft he's top 10 based on club need - Richmond, Melbourne, or St Kilda will grab him somewhere in that block of picks they control between 5 and 10. And it'll be an interesting bit of brinkmanship as to just how high he goes. Will Melbourne pull the trigger on him at 5 if one of FOS, Jagga, Langford, Lalor, Draper or Smillie is available? Likewise, will Richmond pounce at 6 if the Dees take the midfield option?
But on a talent ranking basis, its a fair call that this year's midfield crop get ahead.
@@JBarbs1 I'd be mad if tigers took him at 6
@@bobcat718 Fair call. And thats the difficulty Richmond will face in allocating their bounty of draft picks.
Would you rather Armstrong at 6, or risk him going to St Kilda with the next two picks or even Melbourne at 9? That would almost certainly leave the Tigers needing to take a tall forward at 10 or 11.
The worst case scenario could be Melbourne and St Kilda take both Armstrong and Shanahan off the market with those picks.
Not saying they're the best players, but its based on need. Chances are they'll both look at landing a midfielder and KPP with their 2 top 10 picks.
I can't help but wonder if Richmond are still talking to North about a pick swap for #2 to get around this and land the best 2 mids, Armstrong at 6, and still be the race for Trainor, Travaglia or Berry. Its such a strong draft hand they've got.
Thank you for the awesome content. I was wondering How you rate the Whitlock brothers compared with Ben and Max King at the same age?
Everytime I see the Whitlock boys they remind me of the King brothers. For mine, that makes me concerned about their physicality as I think the King brothers really struggle with that side of the game.
nice, west coast really needs another pick in the 20's this draft, hopefully they can trade in
Yeah they’ll be keen I reckon, I expect a lot of talls to go around there
We also need one in the 40s/50s for Champion. No idea why we gave up 63 and 68 when we gave an academy player to likely match a bid on 🙄
@@chriskelly9476 hearing about concussion problems, since we traded away our late picks that tells me we may not go after him, unless we rookie list him if he doesn’t get drafted
@@JonGarrood ah ok, maybe we won't go for him then.
Thought Ben Camporeale would make the 30s. Is he too hyped because of his name?
Western Bulldogs would be crazy to not take Hannaford or Dattoli, both represent what they need.
@@MapleDogs82 big agree!
Angus Clarke is very underrated for mine. Upside is enormous
@@Spudicos agree strongly with this comment, I have him rated pretty highly compared with others
You better believe that Armstrong is available at 16 after the Kako bid the bombers will trade for it
Huh?
Hes saying the bombers will trade back in after kako for armstrong if hes there. @@richardbehan8118
Can I expect to see Ben Campo in the next vid?
@@geoforce1436 yes 🙌
So you're saying that Essendon gave up pick 9 for no reason?
No because Melbourne and stkilda were going to bid if we had to match with 9
@@richardbehan8118 no I’m definitely not saying that. I think because he’s a small fwd there are several teams interested. This is just my rankings, and I have him around 15. Btw I’m a massive fan. Just have some other mids ahead that not all clubs would.
Hope eagles trade into the draft and end the draft with Allen, Lindsay, moreals
Hamish Davis plays golf?
He’s 31-45 - next one