in books there was even more endegermend whole care for magical creatures is just one big danger for society when hagrid or kettleburn teached it hagrid brouth creatures he wosnt allowed like nothing in 4th year he even bring mutated creatures that were used in maze at the end of the year and he tried to steal dragons egg in 1st task so he should have at least one life sentance from it immagine someone having 10 elephants 30 panthers and 100 cobras and letting them walk around forests near towns and villages and dont carring what they do and letting children take notes on them and feed them that is what hagrid deos and kettleburn from what is implied done the same thing just no dragons and no giants
In the instances where you're charging each individually when more than one is committing different crimes / distinct acts of the same crime simultaneously (the polyjuice, for example), they would have entered into a criminal conspiracy so all would be charged for all crimes in furtherance of said conspiracy, whether or not they were directly responsible for the individual counts. So for instance, each of the Golden Trio would be charged with 6 counts of ID theft via polyjuice: 2 counts each from the Slytherin common room, 3 each from the Ministry of Magic, and 1 each from the bank.
During the year Ron used Imperio on the Goblin, the unforgivable curses were legalized and there for he gets out scotch free. I'd argue that using the time turner is a fraud, because no student is meant to have them. The accusation goes for McGonagall too since she was to give Hermione the time turner. Good thing you are judging only by the movies, in book 4 she can be found guilty in: 1.Kidnapping. 2.Torture and starvation. 3.Blackmail in threats. All of these were done against Rita Skeeter.
I would count Harry using Sectumsempra on Malfoy as self defense, considering Malfoy cast the first spell (in the books he tried to cast Crucio) so Harry was really just defending himself, like with Quirell.
Don't know which legislation we're going by, as some of the punishments provided here differ from the Swedish legal system, but there are some additions that would at least exist in my country: - 4:50 Attacking a member of the court during a trial would not be regular assault, but violence against a public servant (+2 years) and gross interference in a judicial matter (up to 8 years) - 6:10 I would argue breaking and entering over trespassing. - 7:15 Should be considered child endangerment. - 24:04 I wouldn't call Dumbledore's Army an illegal business, as it is in no way commercial. However, it could be considered unlawful military activity (2 years) if not armed threat against the legal order (6-10 years). - 27:40 Again, violence against a public servant (+2 years) and gross interference in a judicial matter (up to 8 years). - Besides aiding in the escape of a criminal, Harry and Hermione are also guilty of protecting a criminal due to knowing of Sirius' whereabouts without reporting him.
The Dursley's may have been Harry's legal guardians, but they were holding him prisoner. All Ron, Fred and George did was rescue him. That's not illegal.
For Harry: Accidental magic like the vanishing glass and inflating Marge doesn’t count. That said: Marge provoked Harry, just like Dudley and Vernon also provoked him into pointing a wand at them. (Doesn’t excuse what Harry did, but it’s not like they were innocent) Also: the Imperio on the Goblins wouldn’t necessarily be a Life Sentence. The books say using an unforgivable on a Human is a life sentence. Goblins aren’t human. Might be a bit of a problematic law, but technically Harry didn’t break that law on those cases with how it’s explained. I’m pretty sure they say multiple times that it’s using them on a human is when it’s illegal.
missed quite a few moments even if you were doing just movies. Hermione in particular was quite the rambunctious young lady she set snape on fire. And some of these could be argued as self defense
Ron: - How about breaking into Gringotts with the Intention to steal something (Hufflepuff's Cup, since that was one of the Horcruxes)? Did I miss that one? (It was noted for Harry and Hermione). Hagrid: - Ron took Harry away and that was deemed kidnapping, as Harry is a money and the Dursleys did not consent. How about Hagrid taking Harry away (especially since Hagrid is a NOT a minor?) - "My father will hear about this!" 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 I'm dead. (Of course, this was Draco's own fault as he did precisely that what Hagrid told him NOT to do). Hermione: - 9:56 - Aside from "Assault" about about "Threatening"? (And "Foul loathesome evil little cockroach" should be enough for an Order of Merlin, 1st class) Harry: - "Are you really going to kill me, Harry?" suggests an attempted murder...???? I also miss Harry, Ron, Hermione (along with Neville, Ginny and Luna) being in the department of mysteries. Their presence alone there was already illegal, as that was a restricted area for which none of them had clearance.
You know it would be interesting to see how some of these charges would stick in magical court. I do imagine that Dumbledore would’ve probably dismissed like some of the detentions and such although they did serve detention a few times so that’s something that you probably should’ve kept in mind, I would say that since a lot of this happened on school grounds, I mean, you know again that would be up to Dumbledore whether that punishment or not sticks. As for all the others, I think they deserve a full pardon because they were trying to save the world. As for Malfoy however I do think he deserves a lesser punishment and I do think that putting him in therapy and rehabilitating him would make a lot of sense.
Hagrid should also include impersonating a tyre wit a fast leak 🤣🤣🤣 Hermione it is not a crime to assist in the release of an innocent person. But shouldn't that be Ear Dropping. Draco Malfoy fired first, it is his attempted assault, no matter the damage done it is in self defence.
I'm just scrolling through videos and this one was suggested for me and upon seeing the thumbnail I hear Harry in the back of my head from the 4th movie 'crime what crime'
I Think it’s Harry Potter I Would Charge Him For The Crime Against Draco Malfoy For Casting That Dangerous Spell On Draco Malfoy and Again Draco is Only Taking The Blame For Trying To Punish His Father For No Particularly Reason I Blame Harry Potter For Attacking a Slytherin Student in Anger
I totally agree that they should be punished being a "hero" or being the reason for winning is not important when being charged. the wizarding world could have easily dealt with boldy voldy they just kept making stupid plans because they were blinded by the fact that he was very strong so they did not need these "heroes" furthermore laws should not be biased for the ones who helped them they did crimes and that is it
when ron and harry casted the impurius curse at gringotts and harry with crucio at bellatrix, it was not a crime. as it was during the war when the death eaters controlled the ministry and made them legal to use
•Couldn’t they park the car on the train while the car is invisible? •Harry: We should wait by the car. Ron’s thoughts: we should take the car to school. *Harry and Ron in the car* Harry: This is not what I ment. Ron: Too late now •Take Ron to Malfoy to barf up slugs on to Malfoy. Or use magic to throw slugs at Malfoy. •Wouldn’t the money be in Pounds Sterling not US Dollars? The fines would be more than Fifteen Thousand? •To be fair how would first year Hogwarts students who have not been to Hogwarts till their first year at Hogwarts know where anything or anyone is in the school unless someone took them to the thing or person or gave them a map. I’m surprised Neville did not get lost along with Ron and Harry and that more first year students did not get lost as well.
Hermione in the books is an ever bigger menace. Includes things such as kidnapping (Rita Skeeter) or permanent mutilation (the snitch of the DA) . „bUT WHAt aBOuT tHE ruLEs“ my ass
I needed to remind my of your name movie courtroom and your going to base it on movies, because in the books Hermione’s sentence would be far higher. Plus Ron was never caught out of bed and losing 50 points that was Neville
If Burton/Schumachervese Villains Were Charged For their Crimes Case 1 Carl Grissom & Jack Napier/Joker (Batman 1989) Case 2 Oswald Cobblepott/Penguin Max Shrek & Selina Kyle/Catwoman (Batman Returns 1992) Case 3 Edward Nigma/Riddler & Harvey Dent/Two-Face (Batman Forever 1995) Case 4 Victor Fries/Mr Freeze & Pamela Isley/Poison Ivy (Batman & Robin 1997)
They could file this as kidnapping - Tsken from an avusive home where he is being sterved. If child endsnferment for dumbledoor isnt on this list like 5 times ill be annoied
Would Hagrid’s motorcycle be considered a makeshift/unregistered vehicle since a regular Royal Enfield Bullet 500 doesn’t fly or have a turbo boost next to the odometer?
True, but who would be charged, Ron or McGonagall? If a teacher orders a twelve year old student to make an experiment which involves animal cruelty and the student does it, who will be charged, the teacher the student or both? I would intuitively only charge the teacher, but I am not sure.
Harry should get life in prison casting crucio it's the law, same for imperious, he didn't commit self defense against queirl he fully killed him he never let go of his face
Harry I haven't even listened to his part yet and I feel like whatever bulshit charges you'll come up with are completely wiped by the fact that he saved the world wizarding and otherwise because he not only saved the wizards and whatever he saved humanity cuz muggles were basically going to be what house elves if not completely wiped out By the way yeah Harry being a minor doesn't even matter in a lot of these things cuz a lot of things you're like oh let's charge him for imprisoning his quote unquote nephew that's his cousin
As Time Traveling is kind of prohibited in Harry Potter, and a paradox could risk everything, maybe you could deem the Time Travel in the third movie as a Crime Against Humanity
Harry seeked Malfoy out. We hear him calling Malfoy out and arriving. “I know what you did Malfoy. You hexed her didn’t you?”Draco began casting spells as Harry went closer to him. Would X be able to claim “Self Defense”if they arrive with the intent of confronting Y? I think Draco can also make the claim of Self Defense.
@@kendraroth1276 If someone who is armed, but has not threatened to use his weapon or pointed it at you blocks your way and accuses you of a crime is it self defense if you draw a weapon, aim for the head and start shooting without warning? By the laws in my country (Germany) Malfoy at the very least would have to tell Harry to stay back or fire a warning shot otherwise he couldn't claim self defense. Is it possible by British laws to try to kill someone who apporoaches you angrily without warning and claim self defense?
@@patrickdematosribeiro1845 They were not in Britain, they were in Scotland. Also I was going by Hogwarts rules and laws. By Hogwarts rules and laws, Draco’s actions do indeed count as self defense. If you go deliberately seeking someone out to either confront them. spy on them or get them into trouble, they are allowed to attack. Examples include. 1. Bertha when she was with Dumbledore and reported someone hexing her. Dumbledore’s response was to ask her why she was with the person in the first place. 2. Snape during Sirius’s “trick”. Instead of Sirius being held accountable for nearly having Snape killed and using Remus as a weapon. The only one held accountable was Snape. “I heard about what happened the other day, you went wandering under the whomping willow and James Potter saved you from whatever’s down there” 3. Hagrid was never held accountable for leaving Draco Malfoy and originally Neville alone to deal with Voldemort in the first book and threatened Draco with expulsion, since Draco wanted to inform the teachers and Dumbledore about Hagrid’s dragon and didn’t want to risk his life. 4. Fred and George were never held accountable for what they did to Montague. Neither were Harry and Ron for what they did to Crabbe and Goyle during Chamber of Secrets or in Half Blood Prince. Also Draco wasn’t trying to kill Harry, he was trying to use a different spell.
@@kendraroth1276 The spell Draco used was aimed at Harry's head and when it missed it caused the wall behind Harry to explode. This implies that if Harry hadn't ducked in time his head would have exploded which seems pretty life-threatening to me. That's why I think he tried to kill Harry or at least took the risk to kill. This is different from most of the examples you mentioned and I doubt this is allowed. I am also not sure whether the examples you mentioned really fit. 1. We see what Dumbledore says to Bertha, but we don't see how the conversation ends. He could have asked her to completely understand what happened and we don't know whether the student who hexed her was punished or not. 2. We know Dumbledore forbade Snape to tell that Lupin was a werewolf, but we don't know whether he was punished in any way. We also don't know whether Sirius was punished we know he wasn't expelled. 3. Draco got a detention because he was out of bed at night. Hagrid told him he would be expelled if he refused to do the detention. When McGonagall decided to give him detention at least in the books she didn't believe there was actually a dragon, she thought Harry had made up a story about a dragon to lure Malfoy out of bed and get him in trouble. After Draco and the others were given the detentions McGonagall apparantely decided being send in the forrest to find out who killed the unicorns was a fitting detention. Why she did this is beyond me. 4. Montangue was not going after Fred and George, he was doing his duties as a member of the inquisitorial squad. Also Hermione says they will be in serious trouble, which implies they were not allowed to attack him. But by the time Montangue was found and had recovered enough to say what had happened to him Fred and George couldn't be punished according to the Hogwarts rules, because they were no longer at school. As for Harry and Ron attacking Crabbe and Goyle in Chamber of Secrets, nobody knew what they had done until they told Dumbledore months later and he basically said: "You saved Ginny, removed the threat from the Chamber and made sure Hogwarts is not closed, so I won't punish you, no matter how many rules you broke." which were clearly special circumstances. There is also an example that proves you are not allowed to attack students who go after you: In Chamber of Secrets Malfoy takes Riddles diary after it falls out of Harry's bag. Harry disarms him to get back the book and is punished. If you are not allowed to use a disarming spell which is pretty harmless to get back a book another student stole from you I seriously doubt you can just fire a potentially more dangerous spell at a student who shouts at you.
@@patrickdematosribeiro1845 The wall didn’t explode when Draco was fighting. What are you talking about? There’s a sound and a light, but we don’t see much other than that. It’s no different than the spells Harry was casting. Whatever Draco’s intentions were, I doubt it was murder. If you read the books, Draco wasn’t using any spells that would have killed Harry. (Though he did try using an unforgivable.) All of my examples except for Bertha could have resulted in deaths. Voldemort and Quirrel easily could have chosen to murder Draco, Neville, Hermione and Harry. It’s only Draco Hagrid consistently left alone to deal with Quirrel/Voldemort. In the books, McGonagall herself was shown dragging Draco by the ear just because He was out at night telling her about the dragon. Werewolf Remus easily could have murdered Snape. It remains to be seen if Sirius was ever held accountable by anyone other than Snape.
I think saving the world from the most evil and dangerous dark wizard who ever lived should give them a full pardon
I fully agree.
Especially when they are confronted by Voldemort or his death eaters!!
Yeah
That's why Kissinger is a complex person.
After all Dumbledore did no jail time despite being Grindelwalds partner for decades.
You skipped the parts where hagrid illegally brought a dragon egg on hogwarts ground with the intent to keep the dragon.
in books there was even more endegermend whole care for magical creatures is just one big danger for society when hagrid or kettleburn teached it hagrid brouth creatures he wosnt allowed like nothing in 4th year he even bring mutated creatures that were used in maze at the end of the year and he tried to steal dragons egg in 1st task so he should have at least one life sentance from it immagine someone having 10 elephants 30 panthers and 100 cobras and letting them walk around forests near towns and villages and dont carring what they do and letting children take notes on them and feed them that is what hagrid deos and kettleburn from what is implied done the same thing just no dragons and no giants
Smuggling illegal stuff, dont remember howlong that is.. think ots 10 years where i live
he also forgot a life sentence for ron, even showed his imperio with harrys case, bit not with rons
@@drinxolp5577 isnt it classed as assult or gbh when hermiony jynxed harrys face too? If so thats another 4 years or so
@@FireBladesGameing harry wouldnt press charges
You forgot 4th year Hermione capturing Rita sceeter in a Glasbottle for two weeks but I guess you go more for the movies😂 still love this video
She kinda deserved it tbh
for real😂
LMAO y'all need to do Fred & George Weasley that would be hilarious
You missed the fact that Hagrid bought an ILLEGAL dragon egg 😂
3:48 The 'Nice Try' made me do a damn spit take. 😂
Hagrid did and has admitted to a LOT of black market stuff when it comes to his animals
In the instances where you're charging each individually when more than one is committing different crimes / distinct acts of the same crime simultaneously (the polyjuice, for example), they would have entered into a criminal conspiracy so all would be charged for all crimes in furtherance of said conspiracy, whether or not they were directly responsible for the individual counts. So for instance, each of the Golden Trio would be charged with 6 counts of ID theft via polyjuice: 2 counts each from the Slytherin common room, 3 each from the Ministry of Magic, and 1 each from the bank.
Imaging if Peter had been accidently permanently transformed to a hairy goblet, that had solved so much and been hilarious 😁
Omg I never put those together that Peter gets transfigured
How do we know it’s Peter and not some actual rat? Harry wasn’t doing that spell on Hedwig after all
@@bowtiesrcool86 It isn't him, it's a random rat provider by the school.
His new name would be rattles.
Ron should have gotten life imprisonment for casting the imperious curse
It was during war and all for taking down a dictator.
Charged Ron for breaking school rules but not for breaking the international statute of secrecy?
School rules are more important than federal law
1 year in prison for "stabbing" Flitwick with fork XDD
During the year Ron used Imperio on the Goblin, the unforgivable curses were legalized and there for he gets out scotch free. I'd argue that using the time turner is a fraud, because no student is meant to have them. The accusation goes for McGonagall too since she was to give Hermione the time turner. Good thing you are judging only by the movies, in book 4 she can be found guilty in:
1.Kidnapping. 2.Torture and starvation. 3.Blackmail in threats. All of these were done against Rita Skeeter.
I would count Harry using Sectumsempra on Malfoy as self defense, considering Malfoy cast the first spell (in the books he tried to cast Crucio) so Harry was really just defending himself, like with Quirell.
Would Hagrid’s stabbing with a fork be chargeable? I did not get the impression it was anything but an accident.
Accidental assault?
Many of these aren't actual crimes so it's just for comedy
Don't know which legislation we're going by, as some of the punishments provided here differ from the Swedish legal system, but there are some additions that would at least exist in my country:
- 4:50 Attacking a member of the court during a trial would not be regular assault, but violence against a public servant (+2 years) and gross interference in a judicial matter (up to 8 years)
- 6:10 I would argue breaking and entering over trespassing.
- 7:15 Should be considered child endangerment.
- 24:04 I wouldn't call Dumbledore's Army an illegal business, as it is in no way commercial. However, it could be considered unlawful military activity (2 years) if not armed threat against the legal order (6-10 years).
- 27:40 Again, violence against a public servant (+2 years) and gross interference in a judicial matter (up to 8 years).
- Besides aiding in the escape of a criminal, Harry and Hermione are also guilty of protecting a criminal due to knowing of Sirius' whereabouts without reporting him.
Don't forget animal cruelty against Hermione for for using reducto on the dragons tail to make the dragon fly.
@10mastergod I think that was to release a chain that was tied to the dragon's tail!!
The Dursley's may have been Harry's legal guardians, but they were holding him prisoner. All Ron, Fred and George did was rescue him. That's not illegal.
Yeah did you see the lock?
It’s still kidnapping lol
@@Wolfofodin420 If kidnapping a literal prisoner is a crime - a prisoner who's done nothing wrong - I see a pardon coming.
But as their legal guardians, this isnt false imprisonment, they are in their legal right to keep harry locked in his room
@skyeplaysgames4598 bro no they aren't it's child endangerment and neglect
8:12 i dont think hagrid should be charged here since they were being attacked
Marge asked for it. And it was accidental
For hagrid: owning illegal animals (dragon PS/SS, Aragog CoS, Blast ended skrewts GoF)
For Hermione: stealing/obstructing justice (taking buckbeak)
*Dobby casually hits the wall* 17:16
Harry cast accidental magic you cant blame anyone else but the Dursleys.
And there is a door for the zoo keeper to use, which proberbly is not locked.
@@sannejensen4132 "proberbly"????
That's not a crime at all.
For Harry: Accidental magic like the vanishing glass and inflating Marge doesn’t count. That said: Marge provoked Harry, just like Dudley and Vernon also provoked him into pointing a wand at them. (Doesn’t excuse what Harry did, but it’s not like they were innocent)
Also: the Imperio on the Goblins wouldn’t necessarily be a Life Sentence. The books say using an unforgivable on a Human is a life sentence. Goblins aren’t human. Might be a bit of a problematic law, but technically Harry didn’t break that law on those cases with how it’s explained. I’m pretty sure they say multiple times that it’s using them on a human is when it’s illegal.
6:53 thats the best music in the film
missed quite a few moments even if you were doing just movies. Hermione in particular was quite the rambunctious young lady she set snape on fire. And some of these could be argued as self defense
Shouldn’t all of them have aiding and abetting a criminal? Since they all knew where Sirius was?
9:49 should have putted heromine putting fire in snape’s cloth
Could you do the hunger games??
Ron:
- How about breaking into Gringotts with the Intention to steal something (Hufflepuff's Cup, since that was one of the Horcruxes)? Did I miss that one? (It was noted for Harry and Hermione).
Hagrid:
- Ron took Harry away and that was deemed kidnapping, as Harry is a money and the Dursleys did not consent. How about Hagrid taking Harry away (especially since Hagrid is a NOT a minor?)
- "My father will hear about this!" 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 I'm dead. (Of course, this was Draco's own fault as he did precisely that what Hagrid told him NOT to do).
Hermione:
- 9:56 - Aside from "Assault" about about "Threatening"? (And "Foul loathesome evil little cockroach" should be enough for an Order of Merlin, 1st class)
Harry:
- "Are you really going to kill me, Harry?" suggests an attempted murder...????
I also miss Harry, Ron, Hermione (along with Neville, Ginny and Luna) being in the department of mysteries. Their presence alone there was already illegal, as that was a restricted area for which none of them had clearance.
20:27 I mean fudge let him completely off the hook for that one and he’s in charge of the British ministry of magic aka the magic government
You know it would be interesting to see how some of these charges would stick in magical court. I do imagine that Dumbledore would’ve probably dismissed like some of the detentions and such although they did serve detention a few times so that’s something that you probably should’ve kept in mind, I would say that since a lot of this happened on school grounds, I mean, you know again that would be up to Dumbledore whether that punishment or not sticks. As for all the others, I think they deserve a full pardon because they were trying to save the world. As for Malfoy however I do think he deserves a lesser punishment and I do think that putting him in therapy and rehabilitating him would make a lot of sense.
The “my father will hear about this” “+rip buckbeak” does hagrid dirty 😂😂😂
You forgot kidnapping Rita skeeter
I will died voldemort
You forgot all of 3rd year for Ron.
3:34 RON SLAPPING HIM HAD ME ON THE FLOOOR
Forgot about property damage on the Dursley's house
Given all of Harry’s crimes, Umbridge really wasn’t that bad of a person.
Harry's **crimes** were for good reasons tho
@@ItsSleeve The path to hell is paved in good intentions.
Its that whole, the ends dont justify the means argument
@@crimsonknight7011 Oh come off it m
Dudley was Harry’s cousin, not his nephew.
Ron's going to have that $15,000 dept for all his life cuz the Weasley's definitely can't afford that 😅
I feel like punching Malfoy is enough of a wind should undo any other stuff that would have gotten Hermione in trouble 😂
Hermione also should face drug supply as a charge
1:15 blatamt magic in muggle area, mind you also later they use it again same book. Expelled
Hagrid should also include impersonating a tyre wit a fast leak 🤣🤣🤣 Hermione it is not a crime to assist in the release of an innocent person. But shouldn't that be Ear Dropping. Draco Malfoy fired first, it is his attempted assault, no matter the damage done it is in self defence.
I'm just scrolling through videos and this one was suggested for me and upon seeing the thumbnail I hear Harry in the back of my head from the 4th movie 'crime what crime'
I Think it’s Harry Potter I Would Charge Him For The Crime Against Draco Malfoy For Casting That Dangerous Spell On Draco Malfoy and Again Draco is Only Taking The Blame For Trying To Punish His Father For No Particularly Reason I Blame Harry Potter For Attacking a Slytherin Student in Anger
@DanaM-v4x Draco Malfoy attacked Harry first, but Harry shouldn't have used Sectumsempera, especially because he didn't understand what it did!!
I totally agree that they should be punished being a "hero" or being the reason for winning is not important when being charged. the wizarding world could have easily dealt with boldy voldy they just kept making stupid plans because they were blinded by the fact that he was very strong so they did not need these "heroes" furthermore laws should not be biased for the ones who helped them they did crimes and that is it
Ron did not sneak out off bed in the book, right?(first book)
He didn’t in the books but he did in the movies. Ron was in the hospital because of hagrids dragon bit him
@@jameslawrence617 thank you
Idk I think an argument could be made that the Dursleys were beyond abusive.
Wouldn't the rules change as some of these crimes are happening during a time of war?
Harmonie done was more stuff but some how perfect 😂😂😂😂😂
9:45 - that's not drugging them. It's a potion.
I mean are you technically driving if you are flying
"Harry Headshot"
HAHHAHAHAHHAHAAHA
The detentions seem kinda moot once the prison sentence reaches 50 years.
when ron and harry casted the impurius curse at gringotts and harry with crucio at bellatrix, it was not a crime. as it was during the war when the death eaters controlled the ministry and made them legal to use
13:47 just had to show the most gorgeous photo of Hermione didn’t ya
•Couldn’t they park the car on the train while the car is invisible?
•Harry: We should wait by the car.
Ron’s thoughts: we should take the car to school.
*Harry and Ron in the car*
Harry: This is not what I ment.
Ron: Too late now
•Take Ron to Malfoy to barf up slugs on to Malfoy. Or use magic to throw slugs at Malfoy.
•Wouldn’t the money be in Pounds Sterling not US Dollars?
The fines would be more than Fifteen Thousand?
•To be fair how would first year Hogwarts students who have not been to Hogwarts till their first year at Hogwarts know where anything or anyone is in the school unless someone took them to the thing or person or gave them a map. I’m surprised Neville did not get lost along with Ron and Harry and that more first year students did not get lost as well.
Harry Potter being accused of "aiming gun at someone" is self defense because his foster dad pushed him to the wall
Malfoy struck first and it was Snapes negligence with his book that the spell was used against Draco.
If Ron gets a kidnapping charge for taking Harry with the car, shouldn’t Hagrid get a kidnapping charge for taking Harry in the first book?
Why did they first get dettention for breaking in and then 1 year prisson and a fine of 1 K?
Damn Harry Gets 3Life Sentences
Hermione in the books is an ever bigger menace. Includes things such as kidnapping (Rita Skeeter) or permanent mutilation (the snitch of the DA) . „bUT WHAt aBOuT tHE ruLEs“ my ass
man who knew to be a hero you need to be a criminal
I needed to remind my of your name movie courtroom and your going to base it on movies, because in the books Hermione’s sentence would be far higher. Plus Ron was never caught out of bed and losing 50 points that was Neville
I'm curious about what Neville's sentence would be after the boom of the bridge in 7th film...
If Burton/Schumachervese Villains Were Charged For their Crimes
Case 1 Carl Grissom & Jack Napier/Joker (Batman 1989)
Case 2 Oswald Cobblepott/Penguin Max Shrek & Selina Kyle/Catwoman (Batman Returns 1992)
Case 3 Edward Nigma/Riddler & Harvey Dent/Two-Face (Batman Forever 1995)
Case 4 Victor Fries/Mr Freeze & Pamela Isley/Poison Ivy (Batman & Robin 1997)
The rat Ron transfigurated isn't his pet rat, it's a random rat McGonnagall gave him for the class.
24:34 He didn't have it in him to do it properly, though.
do a part 2 with dumbledore please
HERMIONE JEAN GRANGER WHY ARE YOU DRUGGING KIDS 😂
Why did you skip the whole fourth movie
Harry is the only one who gets the worst possible punishment - getting expelled!
They didn't rob the bank they destroyed a cursed item in the bank.
No they robbed the bank. They stole a stolen item that was cursed, then destroyed someone else’s property.
I'm gonna use that excuse next time!
@@MythStarFire It was a war these are the consequences.
29:19 I didn’t know Harry was 7’6
U forgot when harry tried to kill Sirius
My fatherll hear about this!! Rip buckbeack
the draco thing is prolly suing
They could file this as kidnapping -
Tsken from an avusive home where he is being sterved.
If child endsnferment for dumbledoor isnt on this list like 5 times ill be annoied
What about when Bellatrix stabbed Dobby and Harry pulled the knife out of his body I would have charged him with Involuntary Manslaughter.
Isn't Dudley his cousin not his nephew?
Would Hagrid’s motorcycle be considered a makeshift/unregistered vehicle since a regular Royal Enfield Bullet 500 doesn’t fly or have a turbo boost next to the odometer?
Not to mention: violation of Statute of Secrecy (granted: bigger problems at that moment)
Even if Ron didn't know that that was Peter Pettigrew, Vera Verto was technically animal cruelty.
True, but who would be charged, Ron or McGonagall? If a teacher orders a twelve year old student to make an experiment which involves animal cruelty and the student does it, who will be charged, the teacher the student or both? I would intuitively only charge the teacher, but I am not sure.
He could keep the rat like that. A pet cup.
The thumbnail 2 harries💀💀💀💀
10:30 Harry headshot 😂😂😂😂
How is manically growing a tail multilation?
I mean technically all of these or at least most, was with probable cause due to the battle at Hogwarts.
Harry should get life in prison casting crucio it's the law, same for imperious, he didn't commit self defense against queirl he fully killed him he never let go of his face
8:19 my father will be hearing about this
Harry I haven't even listened to his part yet and I feel like whatever bulshit charges you'll come up with are completely wiped by the fact that he saved the world wizarding and otherwise because he not only saved the wizards and whatever he saved humanity cuz muggles were basically going to be what house elves if not completely wiped out
By the way yeah Harry being a minor doesn't even matter in a lot of these things cuz a lot of things you're like oh let's charge him for imprisoning his quote unquote nephew that's his cousin
22:47 horse theft XDDD
As Time Traveling is kind of prohibited in Harry Potter, and a paradox could risk everything, maybe you could deem the Time Travel in the third movie as a Crime Against Humanity
25:50
Wouldn't that have been self defence? As Malfoy attacked first? 🤔
Harry seeked Malfoy out. We hear him calling Malfoy out and arriving. “I know what you did Malfoy. You hexed her didn’t you?”Draco began casting spells as Harry went closer to him.
Would X be able to claim “Self Defense”if they arrive with the intent of confronting Y?
I think Draco can also make the claim of Self Defense.
@@kendraroth1276 If someone who is armed, but has not threatened to use his weapon or pointed it at you blocks your way and accuses you of a crime is it self defense if you draw a weapon, aim for the head and start shooting without warning? By the laws in my country (Germany) Malfoy at the very least would have to tell Harry to stay back or fire a warning shot otherwise he couldn't claim self defense. Is it possible by British laws to try to kill someone who apporoaches you angrily without warning and claim self defense?
@@patrickdematosribeiro1845 They were not in Britain, they were in Scotland.
Also I was going by Hogwarts rules and laws. By Hogwarts rules and laws, Draco’s actions do indeed count as self defense. If you go deliberately seeking someone out to either confront them. spy on them or get them into trouble, they are allowed to attack.
Examples include.
1. Bertha when she was with Dumbledore and reported someone hexing her. Dumbledore’s response was to ask her why she was with the person in the first place.
2. Snape during Sirius’s “trick”. Instead of Sirius being held accountable for nearly having Snape killed and using Remus as a weapon. The only one held accountable was Snape. “I heard about what happened the other day, you went wandering under the whomping willow and James Potter saved you from whatever’s down there”
3. Hagrid was never held accountable for leaving Draco Malfoy and originally Neville alone to deal with Voldemort in the first book and threatened Draco with expulsion, since Draco wanted to inform the teachers and Dumbledore about Hagrid’s dragon and didn’t want to risk his life.
4. Fred and George were never held accountable for what they did to Montague. Neither were Harry and Ron for what they did to Crabbe and Goyle during Chamber of Secrets or in Half Blood Prince.
Also Draco wasn’t trying to kill Harry, he was trying to use a different spell.
@@kendraroth1276 The spell Draco used was aimed at Harry's head and when it missed it caused the wall behind Harry to explode. This implies that if Harry hadn't ducked in time his head would have exploded which seems pretty life-threatening to me. That's why I think he tried to kill Harry or at least took the risk to kill. This is different from most of the examples you mentioned and I doubt this is allowed.
I am also not sure whether the examples you mentioned really fit.
1. We see what Dumbledore says to Bertha, but we don't see how the conversation ends. He could have asked her to completely understand what happened and we don't know whether the student who hexed her was punished or not.
2. We know Dumbledore forbade Snape to tell that Lupin was a werewolf, but we don't know whether he was punished in any way. We also don't know whether Sirius was punished we know he wasn't expelled. 3. Draco got a detention because he was out of bed at night. Hagrid told him he would be expelled if he refused to do the detention. When McGonagall decided to give him detention at least in the books she didn't believe there was actually a dragon, she thought Harry had made up a story about a dragon to lure Malfoy out of bed and get him in trouble. After Draco and the others were given the detentions McGonagall apparantely decided being send in the forrest to find out who killed the unicorns was a fitting detention. Why she did this is beyond me.
4. Montangue was not going after Fred and George, he was doing his duties as a member of the inquisitorial squad. Also Hermione says they will be in serious trouble, which implies they were not allowed to attack him. But by the time Montangue was found and had recovered enough to say what had happened to him Fred and George couldn't be punished according to the Hogwarts rules, because they were no longer at school. As for Harry and Ron attacking Crabbe and Goyle in Chamber of Secrets, nobody knew what they had done until they told Dumbledore months later and he basically said: "You saved Ginny, removed the threat from the Chamber and made sure Hogwarts is not closed, so I won't punish you, no matter how many rules you broke." which were clearly special circumstances.
There is also an example that proves you are not allowed to attack students who go after you: In Chamber of Secrets Malfoy takes Riddles diary after it falls out of Harry's bag. Harry disarms him to get back the book and is punished. If you are not allowed to use a disarming spell which is pretty harmless to get back a book another student stole from you I seriously doubt you can just fire a potentially more dangerous spell at a student who shouts at you.
@@patrickdematosribeiro1845 The wall didn’t explode when Draco was fighting. What are you talking about? There’s a sound and a light, but we don’t see much other than that. It’s no different than the spells Harry was casting. Whatever Draco’s intentions were, I doubt it was murder. If you read the books, Draco wasn’t using any spells that would have killed Harry. (Though he did try using an unforgivable.)
All of my examples except for Bertha could have resulted in deaths.
Voldemort and Quirrel easily could have chosen to murder Draco, Neville, Hermione and Harry. It’s only Draco Hagrid consistently left alone to deal with Quirrel/Voldemort. In the books, McGonagall herself was shown dragging Draco by the ear just because He was out at night telling her about the dragon.
Werewolf Remus easily could have murdered Snape. It remains to be seen if Sirius was ever held accountable by anyone other than Snape.
14:23 he is NAWT his nephew he is his cousin hope this helps
what was ron suppose to do? not fight the troll back?
Awesome vidoes
Some of these charges are quite questionable.