If Harry Potter Was Charged For His Crimes
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 11 มี.ค. 2024
- If Harry Potter Was Charged For His Crimes In The Harry Potter Films (2001 - 2010)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Exclusive Content & To Support The Channel:
PATREON ► / cinemacop
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Harry Potter was an English half-blood wizard, and one of the most famous wizards of modern times. Had he been arrested after the events of "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows", these are the criminal charges he would have faced.
Our exploration extends beyond fiction as we draw parallels to real-world scenarios. We examine cases of real-life criminals and their prosecutions, drawing on legal expertise to examine the likelihood of Harry’s criminal activities leading to actual charges.
Please note that the video you are about to watch is entirely fictional and is produced solely for the purpose of raising awareness on the consequences of committing a crime. The scenes depicted in this video are not real and do not reflect any actual events or persons. We do not condone or promote any illegal or unethical behaviour, and this video is intended to serve as a cautionary tale to deter individuals from engaging in criminal activity.
![Harry Potter Meets The Deads [Kritodaas].mp4](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/1ARrpjg1W_A/mqdefault.jpg)
![McGonagall VS Snape [HD]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/S-i72kSxUAc/mqdefault.jpg)
I understand we're not covering the fictional wizard laws but technically Harry would also face a life sentence for using the Imperio curse in the bank.
But it says Azkaban
As Voldemort had control of the ministry and its laws in this case Imperio or any other dark magic spells were legal.
Plus his use of the Crucio curse against bellatrix
well no its only a life sentance if he had used it on another human
@@lukesmithreborn3023No. not Bellatrix. The Carrow twin in ravenclaw tower. Because it really worked in that scenario. Bellatrix’s was out of “righteous anger “ and didn’t work
Harry: **throws snowballs at people and pulls their pants down**
*6 months in Azkaban*
😂
Bro i'm like 13 years then
Isn't there like something with defending others instead of self defence?
@@melonenlord2723yes
Thts sexual harassment 💀💀💀
“If Harry Potter was charged for his crimes.” Dumbledore said calmly.
3:47
"HARRY! DID YOU MURDER LORD VOLDEMORT?" The portrait of Dumbledore asked calmly.
I CANNOT, I CANNOT 😂😂😂 YOU HAD TO BRING IT UP!
**breaks into restricted section of government facility**
**Charged with Theft and Burglary**
With all due respect, this library is part of the school he attends. He did not remove any books. The hours were not posted; therefore, he has implied consent to enter the faculty
Also destruction of government property, even in the books they damaged a ton of things in the ministry. I think a large part of these numbers are undestating, many would be much higher, breaking into and out of government institutions.
@@alberthaystowniiijd2821 the library, yes. However, you need a teachers note to enter the restricted section
@@alberthaystowniiijd2821department of mysteries not the school library smh
agree
3:56 Even though his magic made her inflate it happened from unintentional and uncontrollable magic that he didn't know he could use and didn't even know existed. Also given the circumstances of his aunt and uncle's unjustified abusive behavior toward him the assault charge could easily be disputed in court
Plus Fudge tells him : "The ministry doesnt send ppl to Azkaban for blowing up their aunts"
Same could be said about letting the snake out and trapping Dudley
@@Fingernamedkid7 true...though this was before he knew he was a wizard and could not really control at the time. not really sure how that would be viewed
With the snake it would be like putting a toddler on prison because he stole something from a shelf without his parent s realizing but with Marge he did choose to not bring her down. When Vernon asks he refuses not says that he can’t
True
Judge: "Harry James Potter are hereby sentenced to 44 years, in Azkaban."
Harry: "Is that all?"
Judge: "And you're also expelled from Hogwarts."
"6 Months in Azkaban" lol
Why are you here? The Boy who Lived...
I threw snowballs at people!
Disgusting!
Quirrell touching Potter: No problem
Potter touching Quirrell: AH, IT BURNS!!
Ah, how the tables have turned
@@dabigcheeze9689 Nah its how the turns have tabled get it right mate🤣
@@TerribleGamer09 alright mate, keep your hair on 💀💀
@dabigcheeze9689 Nah it's hair your keep on
@@VlerkeDamne fr
bro the criminal profile had me dying😂
In Harry Potter 3, Vernon assaulted Harry and obstructed his way , Harry was defending himself using his wand. So he's not guilty of attempted murder, in fact, he never tried to harm anyone, the inflated lady wasn't intentional.
In Harry Potter 5, Umbridge tried to torture Harry with Doloris (which is a crime she knows about), something she already did and tries to drug him with truth serum (also a crime), by not saving her from Kidnapping, he saved himself, so it doesn't count.
Harry obviously knew what he was doing as he did it in response to the lady insulting his mum, and never attempted to help her - Vernon is Harry's legal guardian and was allowed to restrain Harry in a citizen's arrest if he suspected he had committed a crime.
😍😍😍😍@@cinemacop
@@cinemacopit was accidental magic, his magic reacted to his emotions, whether he felt sorry for it is different and I personally wouldn’t feel any remorse when he’d been repeatedly goaded into losing his temper because of her insulting his parents, the insults were worse in the book and lasted a week straight before he lost his temper
Can I request Trixie Tang and Jorgen Von Strangle from Fairly Odd Parents who are from California or Dimmsdale @@cinemacop?
@@cinemacop *I apologize for such a long comment, I looked up from my keyboard after typing it and realized how long it was. You don't have to read it if you don't want to.*
In Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone, in response to Harry's disbelieve at the discovery he's a wizard, Hagrid asks him if there were any "strange things" that happened to him when he was "scared or angry". A witch/wizard's magic is highly undeveloped at a younger age, which is why students are officially admitted to Hogwarts after they turn 11. The Ministry of Magic may have sub laws in place that protect witches/wizards under a certain age so they don't catch the same charges as a full-time student on holiday. That would explain why the ministry never came for Harry when he performed underage magic before going to Hogwarts, because of these sub laws. It could potentially explain why no ministry officials were present at the Hut on the Rock while Hagrid was performing magic, for they could've suspected the magic to be Harry's doing. It's possible, however, that Dumbledore could've sent the Ministry a letter in advance explaining Harry's situation, in which case the Ministry would've ignored the happenings both at Privet Dr and the Hut.
Aren't you forgetting the criminal offense of that hair in his fourth year?
All charges are now aqquited
That hair was glorious
In my opinion, please don't send him to jail, he was so attractive 💀💀
Not really, that's one of the few times his hair has looked the way the book describes it.
Lol fr it didnt suit him
I feel like these should be separate jurisdictions for wizarding and non-wizarding crimes. Also im not sure tue stuff with the snake at the start or blowing up the aunt are crimes per se, as a young wizard isnt in control of their magic. But in the other hand, im pretty sure the civil aviation authority would have something to say about their uncleared flights
That would be like saying manslaughter isnt a crime cause they didn't mean to
How do you argue culp and false imprisonment in the snake scene? As an under age wizard he has no control over the magic used so his actions aren’t unlawful in just being pushed to the ground.
If Gru from Minions was charged for his crimes
Yep
Nah Better wait till Despicable Me 4 cameout
@@Ritsukazed When i said Gru from Minions, i said from Despicable Me
@@Ritsukazedthe video probably released next year cuz waiting for digital version of the movie.
Good point@@Ritsukazed
It's not theft when they take back the Locket, Harry actually owns that, it was taken by RAB (since he got it, and it was Sirius' who owned it after he died, those making it Harry's when Sirius died) then stolen by Mundungus Fletcher, then Umbridge took it from him, and then Harry got it back.
It's complicated. True Umbridge doesn't own it, but neither did RAB. I think Voldemort stole it too, but he would argue that it was rightfully his as the last Skytherin. Can stolen property become un-stolen by stealing it again?
@@Blokewood3 I wouldn't say you can steal a Horcrux, they are kinda their own really, not really things anymore
@Blokewood3 but it's possible harry is also descended from salazar slytherin he and voldy are definitely related tho each descended from a Peverelle brother so the locket could technically be a family heirloom to harry too and the locket would have rightfully been voldys if his mother hadn't needed to sell it
@@elizabethdarroch3000 Good luck trying that defense in court.
"I didn't steal it your honor, this property might possibly have once belonged to a distant ancestor of mine. Maybe. I'm not sure."
@@Blokewood3I don't think it can
If Madea was Charged for Her Crimes.
Do that next.
3:28 They kidnapped him, because they thought he may be needed to save Ginny, so maybe self-defense for that as well.
Only 44 years thats light for the amount of crimes
Just watched this video today. While true, I actually think his sentence would be even lighter than that if we’re being honest. I feel like some of the crimes that contributed to the 44 years he would not have charges pressed for. Some who were on his receiving end were people that either had already somewhat patched things up with him or they wouldn’t care enough to fight him in court over it. I wouldn’t even count out a pardon for him given he was the one who killed Voldemort.
If Dominic Toretto was charged for his crimes (Fast & Furious)
It'll be longer than a Walmart receipt
@@chasethekid11 EXACTLY
This!!!🤌🤌🤌
You cook something
Lots of reckless driving charges
The part where he pointed his wand at Vernon was clearly self-defense, as Vernon touched him first
The only crime in real life is that reboot!
I am hoping for the best with the reboot, calm Dumbledore, smart Ron and a Hermione that isn't perfect but has human flaws. Snape being just the worst and so on :)
@@TFAric 😒 Give me a break...
@@patrickspencer6550 Alright! Recess will be 20 minutes. After the break we are doing a "What Hogwarts house are you?" test.
I hope they potray more of Harry's sassiness throughout the show
@@keshav9261 That too, I just want it to be as close to an 1:1 as possible . Book accurate duelling not flying around like black smoke or Dumbledore and Tom having a beam battle. Less dramatic Quidditch as there were many rule breaking in the films.
I don't want things "improved for the screen"
From the battle of the ministry in Movie 5 onwards, they are at war and you could probably classify Harry as a Soldier, so would everything from then on still count as crimes or as acts of war and therefore need to be looked at from that POV?
Maybe, but in the 7th book Voldemort wins and by that point onward Harry is no longer a soldier (though he wouldn't have been anyway, seeing as he is a minor), but rather an insurgent or a terrorist.
Harry Potter and the 44 years of hard time
Blowing up Aunt Marge, no charge. I'm surprised the narrator didn't count all of the under-age magic use.
You should do what if "The Goodnight Killer" was charged for his crimes, some of them include murdering 6 people in the "Black Well Hotel" and possibly even more
"You're a criminal Harry....
You're a hairy criminal."
POV: me when the headteacher finds out what I do outside of school.
1:00 it was accidental magic, 2:01 dobby did way worse before, harry did almost nothing, 3:24 the teacher was supposed to defeat the basilisk so they just took him with them, 3:58 it was an accident (he used his magic in accident, without wand), 5:28 it wasnt a fair decision (from the justice) but alr, 5:49 sirius was inocent, 6:51 she spied all forms of comunications but not her own fireplace and harry would never be able to go against the centaurs: theyre very strong and both of them werent with wands, 7:11 they entered it as guests in a guest entrance and he was triyng to save a life, 7:40 he didnt knew that this spell would do that and he didnt thought the spells he found in the book vere as dark, 8:29 they were just stunned and she just obliviated the memories of seeing them, 8:52 they were falsily accused to be bad ppl and couldnt reach mundungus to have the horcrux that they wanted to destroy to save the world from Voldemort. Also, he was under 18 in almost every part (u didnt counted imperio as life-sentence, so its not magical world rules) and when not, it was in a war and he was doing it to stop the war.
Just because someone did worse, doesn't mean it's legal to do these stuff. Also he was reckless for using the spell on Draco.
1:00 - thanks that very much tru2
2:01 - yes but that doesn't mean he had the right to do this.
3:24 Lockhard had the right to change his mind, and withdraw at any time, they forced him down. Still kidnapping.
3:58 - yes thanks for pointing that out.
5: 49 - I am not sure if that changes anything or not.
6:51 - I would like to add that, 1 he never harmed her and Hermine came up with everything. Plus this was also done in self defence. Nor had harry any obligation to save her, since any action he could have take would have put him at risk.
8:52 - would add that he said "Find them" not "Kidnapp them" He never told anyone to commit a crime. But he went along with it, when they came with them. It's tricky. I don't think the fact that they were accused of anything would change much. But it was directly a part of the whole war, so maybe?
He knew Sectumsempra was for enemies. He did not know what exactly it did, but he knew enough.
The snake incident and blowing up aunt Marge: Harry had no proper control over his magic. That alone should clear him. (especially when you don't want him to become an obscurial).
Attacking Snape: Of course, when it comes to "assisting an offender", Harry could only be charged for that as nobody believed Black was actually innocent.
Freeing Buckbeak: By the letter of the law, yeah, that would be a crime. But by the letter of the law Buckbeak should never have been convicted in the first place.
Dolores + Centaurs: The centaurs didn't act on Harry's orders nor did he ever take their presence (and anger) in mind. Umbridge made the fault herself to insult the centaurs. Now it can be said that Hermione tried to lure her to Grawp hoping he was get her, but even if that's true, it would be Hermione's crime not Harry as he had no idea what Hermione was up to.
Harming Malfoy with Sectumsempra: Of course, Harry didn't know what his curse would do, but I do not know if THAT would be any valid excuse a lawyer could use in his favor.
Hermione obliviating the Death-Eaters in the coffee shop: Well, my description says it all
Now you forgot the most important crime that tops them all, and Harry did it multiple times. The usage of an unforgivable curse. And the usage of any of these curses will get you a one way ticket to Azkaban (Hermione and Barthy Crouch jr (disguised as Alastor Moody) even state that literally in the moves). So Harry would even without all other crimes having to serve a life long sentence in Azkaban anyway.
A quick summary on the top of my memory:
Cruciatus:
- Bellatrix Lestrange, out of anger due to her murdering his godfather. He fails though, and Bellatrix even teaches him how to use an unforgivable curse properly (in order to mock him).
- Amycus Carrow, out of anger due to him spitting in McGonagall's face
Imperius:
- We even see that in the video, but it was not noted as a crime.
Killing Curse (aka Avada Kedavra):
- The only unforgivable curse none of the trio members ever used at all, for quite obvious reasons.
Ron tried to on nagini
how about crimes that umbridge had done, her changes of them would be 10 times worse then harry's.
I would argue Harry used accidental magic in the Sorcerer's Stone, he had no idea he was even a wizard at the time and the Ministry of Magic won't go after a child for doing it
I’ll wait for Anakin Skywalker/Darth Vader if it happens someday.
By what law should we judge Anakin Skywalker?
@@user-bt3xv8qt3k war crimes would definitely count there
Taking someone into the forbiddon forrest and getting them attacked by centaurs may be illegle for someone else, but if it's umbridge then pls take her away, she shouldn't even be considored human.....
Honestly everyone should've been suspicious of why Harry was never expelled from Hogwarts when he literally breaks multiple rules every single year
I think it’s Because he is the chosen one or he just never got caught
@@DUAPLAYZ and he save the school and lives everytime, so
Well, so did the Marauders and not to mention Voldemort himself (the latter even committing murder during his school years). And they too always got away with that.
It would never matter what Harry had done anyways, because he’s the chosen one, not that it makes him exempt but Dumbledore would never allow Harry to be expelled, he’s too important to not receive proper education. His life was hard enough already
5:08 I don't remember if he did that after finding out the truth or not, but if after then was he really assisting an offender?
Edit: 5:47 Ok, I guess it doesn't matter.
You should do a ”if Raymond Reddington was charges for his crimes from The Blacklist
1:00 Should he really be charged with that if he didn't even know he's a wizard and he did it on accident? Unless I'm missing context.
Just because he didn't intent to do it doesn't mean it didn't happen and he wasn't responsible for it.
@@velikan420He would be responsible if he could have expected it, but no person would ever expect to randomly make a glass disappear and appear again.
Yeah, exactly what I was thinking. It would be difficult to prove in court (magical or otherwise) that he had any intent to do that. He didn’t know magic was real yet let alone that he was a wizard; even if he had noticed that “weird” things tend to happen to him that doesn’t mean he attempted to take advantage of this penchant for weird shenanigans to free the snake. Just because he was happy about the eventual result, that does not prove that he caused the events.
Compare this incident with Matilda Wormwood (from the Roald Dahl book)’s plot against Miss Trunchbull, in which she used her telekinetic powers. Her guilt is way more clear than Harry’s in the case of freeing the snake. Unlike Harry, Matilda a) was by that point in the story fully aware of her powers, b) had learnt to control them to a good degree, meaning any use of them was more than likely not accidental, and c) her plot against Trunchbull was planned, ie premeditated. By contrast, Harry a) had no idea at the time that he was a wizard/had powers, b) even if he was aware of the tendency for weird things to happen in his vicinity he couldn’t control his “weird luck” to kick in on command in exactly the way he wanted to (so even if he was internally wishing that the snake could be free, he couldn’t have assumed that that wish would be realised as a result), and c) did not go to the zoo with the intention of freeing the snake. Assuming that the reality of Matilda and Harry’s powers could be proved in court, it would be more reasonable for Matilda to be found guilty of her plot against Trunchbull than for Harry to be found guilty for freeing the snake.
Either way, both are young kids, not even teenagers, when these incidents happened, so I doubt they’d get taken to court (unless Trunchbull actually died; her fate is left kind of unclear but I assume she was just scared out of town).
@@velikan420Still, according to the rules of the ministry, he isn't responsible for using magic until he goes to Hogwarts because he can't really control it
Great work!
Must do Michael and some others from "The Office"... +"Trailer Park Boys".
11:33 seeing “self defense” after this is the funniest moment in this video
That's actually very little considering how many crimes there were on this list
Hagrid: You’re a criminal Harry.
Harry: I’m a what?
He should have gotten a Breaking and Entering charge for, well, breaking and entering into Umbridge's office.
Its umbidge so its fine
Burglary charge - no breaking and entering in UK
@@cinemacop but its umbridge so he's fine
With some stuff I agree, but most of this is stuff you would just get expelled for or get baned from ever using a wand again, like Hagrid. And you have to keep in mind that most of this happend, while he was a minor, so there you would also have to adjust the verdicts.
Harry kills Voldemort, all considering him as a hero and from all that charges in conclusion being pardoned.
It does make you wonder what the wizarding laws surrounding the use of potions such as the Polyjuice Potion are.
Next one: Lincoln Clay from Mafia III, please.
If being gorgeous was a crime, then Daniel Radcliffe would have been sentenced to life imprisonment
The first charge shouldn’t count because he did not know he was magical yet as this was before he got his hogwarts letter and learn to control it
fun fact but Harry only used the Sectumsempra curse because Malfoy started saying Crucio and Harry didn't want to be hit by an unforgivable curse
I love how the thumbnail says the 12 year old harry is 7 feet tall. Makes sense
Lmao I noticed it too
Do if Ryuko Matoi was charged for her crimes (if she has any that is)
If Vladimir Makarov was charged for his crimes (OG Modern Warfare trilogy)
his list of crimes would pretty much be the entire plot
@@Underworlder5 There's also some other crimes that were highlighted in the No Russian intro when Shepherd opened up Makarov's file to Allen.
10:29 i never realized that but he literally just used the imperious curse which is supposed to be an unforgivable curse
I love how this video is longer than the Voldemort one 🤣
Next one is if Cloud Strife was charged for his crimes.
If Nicholas Mendoza was charged for his crimes (Battlefield Hardline)
The fact that he is expelled from Hogwarts in his first year but still doing all these things
I want to be Harry Spotter, the guy who lifted
I cannot imagine if you would count others like Snape, the Malfoys and even Umbridge.
In movie 5 Harry uses the Cruciatus Curse on Bellatrix, as an unforgivable that is a life time in Azkaban and you showed him use the Imperious Cruse on the goblin that would have the same results, there could be a argument that goblins don't have the same rights as wizards and that it would not be lifetime using it on a "magical creature"
Iirc doesn't the cruciatus curse fail, so it would only be "attempted cursing" or something lol
I think it worked, she did fall on the ground (at least in the movie, can't remember the book scene right now.) it didn't work well but it still did something.
@@TFAric it's been a while since I read the books, but I seem to recall her not being that affected, laughing it off and telling harry he had to mean it
I got a harry potter hogswarts mistery ad in the middle of this video
cruciatus on bellatrix and a couple of imperius curses while robbing gringotts left the chat
Do if NATHAN DRAKE WAS CHARGED FOR HIS CRIMES
Dolores Umbridge: *_infinity years at azkaban_* (like, imperiusing her into making a horcrux, then binding both that horcrux and her semi-mortal body to remain there forever)
1:56 Technically saying that if he didn’t leave before his bones healed back he might strangle him doesn’t count as threats.
While this may sound dumb there are two things that make it not hold up. One he said if he doesn’t leave by x time which means there is an if there and two he said might.
These two things make it not count and the reason I know this is because my brother is schizophrenic and made similar threats and when we called the cops to get help they said they couldn’t do anything because of those two reason.
We had another issue where he said similar stuff in a fast food place full of people so plenty of witnesses and the cops gave us the same reason. (Different county than the first one)
Slavery is only illegal if your slave is human. People still enslave animals all over the world. Such as horses as transportation, or bulls to plow fields. (Although cars and tractors are much more popular in more developed nations.)
Since house elves are not humans, their enslavement is not only legal by wizarding law, but by British law, too.
Very true. It wasn’t THAT long ago when humans were enslaved, and that was allowed until it was outlawed. The wizarding world has its own laws, so if slavery ever gets outlawed, only then would Harry or other owners of house elves be in trouble
8:32
My thoughts: "My father will hear about this!"
I think you forgot the 2 times Harry used the cruciatus cures, which would’ve landed him 5 years each
Crucio is actually punishable by life imprisonment. He only actually used it one time that counted, though.
You could also consider kidnapping Draco in the shrieking shack scene. If you look at the clip, Harry drags him over a fence, said fence is probably a property line.
Dumbledore excuse after seeing this: the way of the wizard is not in which you seek…
Dumbledore after seeing this video: "900000000 points to gryffindor!"
You forgot that Harry Potter used Cruccio against Bellatrix Lestrange in Movie 5 after Bellatrix Lestrange killed Sirius Black!!! So Harry Potter would face a Lifetime Sentence in Azkaban!!!
That’s not true
@@KadeStringer2.0 It is - the use of any of the three Unforgivable Curses is a life sentence in prison. Multiple people on both sides say it - Hagrid, Barty Crouch Jr, Barty Crouch Sr, Snape and I believe Neville Longbottom all make references to it being a life sentence. There are of course exceptions - if you can prove that there was good reason (i.e, an Auror uses one in the line of duty) or that you were under the influence of the Imperius Curse, you won't be prosecuted.
but the curse didn't work / didn't went off. So I guess it doesn't count? (I mean I know that usually it doesn't change anything, if you try to murder and fail due to you incompetence or not. But you have to keep in mind that it failed because he didn't want to do it.
I know that this isn't exactly fully serious, but everything that happens in year 5 while he's at Hogwarts, should be discounted on the grounds that he was trying to 'defend' himself and his classmates from Umbrige, if the ministry was being rational Umbrige herself would already have been fired and arrested early in the school year for assault through the use of cruel and unusual punishment(making Harry write lines with the enchanted bloodquill.)
Also I know we're going with movoe canon here, but the grievous bodily injury was self- defense since in the books Malfoy was in the process of casting Crucio when Harry had cast Sectumsempra.
ROFL I’m laughing so hard I’m wheezing 😂
we all know Harry is pure of heart, even though he has 44+ years in Askaban ☺
Some of this was done to protect people ... minus the Dudley and the snake (before he had control of his magic), blowing up his aunt, and threatening to kill Dobby
0:59 Culpable and reckless conduct -> max punishment = life in prison, but the actual punishment depends on the circumstances. I've found an example of a 500 pound fine with no jail for throwing a cone of a bridge, causing an injury on a woman. Since no harm was actually done here, I'm gonna go with that. The false imprisonment was accidental and thus included in the reckless conduct.
1:20 I agree: breaking school rules -> expelled
2:00 Elves have no rights in the wizard world. -> no charge
2:31 You're using the Wizard prison of Azkaban for their sentences under the UK jurisdiction. That ain't right: 2× administering noxious substance + 2× kidnapping -> 2+y in British prison
2:58 Identity theft -> 6+m in British prison
3:28 kidnapping + reckless endangerment/conduct [taking Lockhart to the COS] -> 1+y in British prison + since the Chamber is very deadly, I'm gonna go with the max punishment of life in British prison.
3:57 Aunt Marge was an accident, so reckless conduct. "Keep away from me" is not assault, more of a threat. -> The severity of the reckless conduct is hard to determine, but since it was accidental, I'm gonna go easy on him and just give him the 500 pound fine. + 6+m in British prison
4:25 Breach of privacy + criminal trespass -> 6+m in British prison
4:43 3× assault -> 6+m in British prison
5:08 Battery + assisting an offender -> I'll grant that this is not British, but magic jurisdiction, so yeah, 1y+ in Azkaban
5:28 Preventing course of justice -> Also magic jurisdiction, so 6+m in Azkaban
5:46 Assist in escape of lawful custody -> Magic jurisdiction, so 1+y in Azkaban
6:50 Burglary + Assessory to kidnapping + not assisting escape from danger -> >4.5+y in British prison
7:10 Theft + burglary + flying unregistered vehicles + flying with no license -> I'm gonna go with 5y in prison for the flying, 'cause that's the punishment for flying a drone 5.5+y in British prison + 1+y in Azkaban [The burglary is in a wizard government facility, so their jurisdiction
7:39 Grievous bodily harm -> 1.5+y in British prison
8:07 Self defense + having others pretend they're him (identity fraud) + flying unregistered vehicle -> I'm gonna go light on him with the identity fraud, so minimum of 5y -> 10y in British prison
Also, at this point, Voldemort is in control of the wizarding government and Harry is a fugitive. However, at the time of the story, there was no extra punishment for being a fugitive.
8:28 Actual bodily harm -> 2+y in British prison.
Also, technically, those people, as well as Voldemort at 8:07 are officers of the law, as explained above. Therefore, he is not acting in self defense, but actually 2× resisting arrest + 3× attacking an officer of the law -> 2×2y + 3×2y in Azkaban -> 10y in Azkaban
8:51 Elves have no rights, so no coercion and -1 kidnapping. 1× kidnapping -> 1+y in British prison
9:18 3× battery + 3× kidnapping -> 4.5+y in Azkaban [they're members of the wizarding government]
9:34 Identity theft + burglary -> 1.5+y in Azkaban [wizard government]
10:00 Causing public nuisance + contempt of court -> 1y in Azkaban
10:08 Actual bodily harm + theft -> 1.5+y in Azkaban
10:44 Kidnapping + bank robbery + using unforgivable curse -> life + 3+y in Azkaban
11:03 Manslaughter + theft -> 2.5+y in Azkaban
11:30 4× manslaughter + aggrevated criminal damage -> 9+y in Azkaban
Also: he tried to cast Crucio on Bellatrix -> life in Azkaban
Also also: he stole and flew the flying car -> 5.25y in British prison
Also also also: He was flying on Buckbeak, another unregistered vehicle -> 5y in British prison
Total crimes:
> British jurisdiction:
- 3× Culpable and reckless conduct
- 2× Administering noxious substance
- 4× Kidnapping
- Identity theft
- Threatening
- Breach of privacy
- Criminal trespass
- 3× Assault
- Burglary
- Assessory to kidnapping
- Not assisting escape from danger
- 2× Theft
- 4× Flying unregistered vehicles + with no license
- Grievous bodily harm
- Identity fraud
- Actual bodily harm
> Wizard jurisdiction:
- Breaking school rules (countless accounts)
- Battery
- Assisting an offender
- Preventing course of justice
- Assist in escape of lawful custody
- 2× Burglary
- 2× resisting arrest
- 3× attacking an officer of the law
- 3× battery
- 4× Kidnapping
- Identity theft
- Causing public nuisance
- Contempt of court
- Actual bodily harm
- 2× Theft
- Bank robbery
- 2× Unforgivable curse
- 5× Manslaughter
- Aggrevated criminal damage
Total sentence:
Expelled from Hogwarts, 39.75y + life in British prison, 56.5y + 2× life in Azkaban, 1000 pound fine.
for all of this harry potter is never going to british jail and is never going to azkaban.
@@user-qj3wx2tx2b, are you saying he'd be sentenced to death for all these crimes?
@@Firespark7 harry potter never be arrested and never be sent in british jail or never be in azkaban
@@user-qj3wx2tx2b, why not?
Doesn't the map have limitations. I didn't think it could tell you exactly what a person is doing, just where they are. Could someone tell me. Cant find a vid on everything it can do.
1:01 Technically the false imprisonment part doesn’t actually count because that didn’t actually happen in the book.
Well:
1st book: murder of a teacher, trespassing, assisting in the concealment of a illegally owned dragon, standing by as a fellow student was stupefied.
2nd book: driving a magical car to Hogwarts, destruction of property, forcing a teacher to come with him into a dangerous chamber against his will.
3rd year: assaulting a teacher(snape), illegally sneaking into private property( the tunnel in honeydukes), and using a time turner to free a suspected criminal.
4th year: not actually that much, he might be suspected of murder of Cedric, and he was using supplies stolen from Snapes office.
5th: performing unlicensed teaching of defensive spells, knowingly letting a ministry official be taken by centaurs to almost certain death and incriminating her( rightfully), sneaking into private and secret property, destruction of almost all time turners and prophecies, attempted use of cruciatus curse on Bellatrix and nearly using killing curse on her.
6th year: use of sectumsempra on Malfoy, attempting cruciatus curse and sectum sempra on Snape, etc.
7th year: use of imperius, cruciatus curse, assault of ministry officials, kidnapping and impersonating ministry officials and robbing them of clothes, breaking into a bank and robbing it, plus settting a very dangerous creature loose.
Do L. Malloy or R. Wesley next, please.
My fav line is if there’s something wrong the b*tch there’s somthing wrong with the pup
we need more characters!!
1:22 that part sounds like a commercial
If Kisaki Tetta was charged for his crimes (Tokyo Revengers)
I don't know how much it contributes to the sentence, but the first crime is clearly unintentional.
Edit: I think a threat of strangulation is more a threat of assault than a threat to kill.
Edit 2: I think the snowballs + pants pulling would even if technically illegal would get laughed out of any court room, and would at worst result in community service.
How did you get Azkaban sentences from?
maybe the dursleys were right to keep him in that cupboard
After 7:22 it makes no more sense, he spelled Cruciatus on Bella, it’s a life sentence :D
I dont know the specifics, but arent their reprocussions to flying in airspace without a license?
can i tag along w making these vids i have a couple shows/characters i wanna do
Who?
The sentences would probably run concurrently, rather than consecutively. As a minor, he would end up in a YOI.
If his defence to a muggle court was "I'm a wizard trying to stop bad wizards", he may end up with detention for treatment under the MHA.
The prosecution would also need the CPS to be on board, and some of the issues raised in this video would likely not pass the public interest test.
are we not talking about the times harry used the unforgivable curses?
Day whatever of asking you to make if Sachiko Shinozaki was charged for her fund
So According to Hermione: 44 years in Azkaban and "worse" 😂 ;)
Can narrow it down more:
Use of the Imperius & Cruciatus Curse - Life sentence...
And Expelled from Hogwarts.
Technically he would be pardoned for being a major contributor to winning the war
I personally dont think the first charge should count
I got a Harry Potter ad before😂
I wonder how much Sirius would get if he was charged with his actual crimes.