I guarantee you the reason why they removed them was due to multiplayer. It would be confusing having four players all wearing the Luigi amiibo costume, and if that's why they're removed then honestly I'm glad they were. Proper additional characters and multiplayer is a much better trade off.
I love both of these games and, while I think Mario Maker 2 might be better in terms of content with the world maker, 3D World theme, and multiplayer, Mario Maker just fits perfectly on Wii U with the GamePad. Amiibo costumes were great too, and it was such a special moment experiencing a game like that for the first time...
I can definitely see valid reasons why someone would prefer the first over the second. For example, there was more engagement with the community with the first game, they would release their own official levels pretty frequently and this would be how most of the amiibo costumes were unlocked. Things like that really helped grow a community around the game, which is something the second game definitely feels like its lacking especially now in 2024. The gamepad also just felt way nicer to build with, the ui just worked so well. The sanitized charm in SMM2 is also another good argument to make, but there's one argument you raised that I just completely flat out disagree with. SMM2 isnt worse because it has too much content, if anything the game suffers from not having ENOUGH. The leap from 1 to two in terms of options was definitely a big leap, but it just wasnt big enough in my opinion. A lot of the features that were added were either things that should've been in the first game to begin with, or things being held back by the way they were implemented. The SMB2 gameplay is a perfect example of a good concept held back by execution, sure the game is objectively better for having it due to giving players more ways to spice up their levels, but its just being a power up instead of a full blown style really brings the whole thing down because if you want to design a level around the mario 2 mechanics, you have to constantly put the item everywhere in your level to ensure the player always has it, which just ruins the difficulty of levels in the most place. Another example that comes to mind of good concepts being held back is the fire spitting yoshis. The red yoshi is cool and all, but why just restrict the fire spitting to a specific yoshi? Wouldn't it be way cooler if they just implemented the SMW color coded ability system instead? Adding all four Koopa and Yoshi colors from SMW and have them behave the same way, would give players so many more options for their levels. There's also infuriating restrictions when it comes to what items can be used in what gamestyle *Cough* Fire Bros *Cough* Clear Pipes *Cough* The lack of options in the first game is more justifiable due to it being the first game and being on an unsuccessful system, but there really was no excuse for this game, especially if there's only one new gamestyle. Limitation does inspire creativity, but there's only so much you can draw with a stick in mud before it dries up. I don't know, maybe I'm just spoiled from SMBX and romhacks, but my biggest issue with SMM2 is that it doesn't feel as innovative as the first, but it's at least a little better than the first due to the added options. 🤷♂️
i think mario maker 3 should either be a 3d engine, or could introduce scripting as well as sprite editing, and really anything else like that if nintendo wants to not have to release another sequel in atleast 10 years
There was a weird tonal shift from 1 to 2 that I've never really seen anyone mention. 1 used to really incentivize self-growth as a maker/player by offering goals you reach on your own, but in 2 it really expects to pit you in a competition. Everything from the gamemodes to medals tied to a leaderboard to the hard as balls achievements you can show off on your mii makes 2 feel more like a popularity contest which just isn't fun. You can even feel it in the levels. Ever wonder why there are so many "refreshing levels"? Clout Also bring back stacked pipes Nintendo
6:44 …what, the touch screen still works on the switch version though. Idk maybe it's more convenient in the original, I haven't actually made a level in SMM1 for a long time so maybe that's what you're talking about
Nah I like MM2 more. But I hate how they pretty much gave up on updating the game, MM1 got so many updates and had events and stuff. If MM2 got updated at least for another year or two, it would be one of the best Mario games ever made.
I grew up with the 3ds version and I have so many memories with that, but alas, I have even more memories with SMM2, I was so hyped for that game and it's my most played game of all-time (by a large margin, SMM2 on 900+ hours and my second most MK8D is only at 300+ hours), I don't really have any experience with the Wii U version, except from once at a friend's house and a few times on an emulator, but the memories I have with both SMM3DS and SMM2 will make no amount of arguments surpass what these 2 games gave me
Yeah, I agree with the Mystery Mushroom being removed being a problem with the sequel, because although I technically have the first Mario Maker, I have the port that you said you don't talk about (the 3DS one).
I agree, SMM2 just didn't have the same appeal for me, mainly cause the level editing wasn't nearly as intuitive. I had made 75 levels in the first game, and was so excited for 2, and I even bought an amazon stylus that could work with the Switch, but I only ended up making 3 or 4 levels because all the intuitive design had been replaced with menus to manually select everything. Wanna change a koopa's color? You can't just give it a shake, no now you have to hold down on it for a couple seconds to bring up a menu and then select the koopa's color. Genuinely SMM2 feels soulless compared to the first game. I got my mileage out of playing levels in 2, but the creating part of the game was ruined for me, it was so unappealing.
You spent 10 minutes saying you prefer the first one, but everything you said just gave points to the sequel. Missing slopes on the original is honestly bad enough that it’s useless.
I never got to experience the "charm" of Mario Maker because I didnt have a Wii U. For me that same charm started with Mario Maker 2 so I never really understood why people loved MM1 over 2 because, like you said, 2 just seemed to have way more content but now I realize that people just feel the exact same way about MM1 that I do for MM2.
I agree with you that SMM1 is better for MAKING levels with the touch screen. But making levels is less than 3% of the time the average players will spend on the games. People will probably make a dozen levels maximum. In that sens, I prefer having more content in the game and bit less intuitive Level Editor. It brings a lot more of variety. Also, yes... losing 100 Mario challenge and Amiibo costumes is a shame... But I love playing coop with my friend in SMM2!
Mario Maker 2 is a better game on a worse console. Honestly, in terms of graphics and performance the Switch is better, but it lacks charm that the Wii U has and is less convenient (even with it being handheld wherever you go)
Nah Mario Maker 2 is better, improves on the first game in every way. Just because there's less easter eggs and no amiibo costumes doesn't mean Mario Maker 1 is better.
@@splaturials9156 It really isn't. Plus, Mario Maker 2 has the SM3DW style, new enemies, new course parts, new everything, new SLOPES, a story mode with actual decent levels, and its online still works lol. How is that not an upgrade in every aspect?
@@Rediscool9Even then, the level playing experience is much better in SMM2. Finding good levels is significantly easier in SMM2 with shorter codes and a more in depth search filter.
good points. makes me think of all those homebrew arcade "VS Fighters" created in MUGEN... they were great, but people's character select screens would be ridiculous... character icons the size of a pin and it took forever to find the character you wanted (Marvel Vs. Capcom 2 in the official games to me pretty much hit the limit of having a reasonably large selection that didn't make it ridiculous... because eventually you just want to have a match and not take longer to pick your characters than to have that match that is going to be under 3 minutes)
Nah, both games are just as good as each other, but for different reasons. SMM1 was infinitely more limited in terms of creativity and level creation but had more charm and easter eggs, whereas SMM2 was the opposite. We have many new tools, themes, modes, and additions, but all of the easter eggs and overall charm is gone, and I think this is mostly due to it being on the Switch. I'm hoping we get two screens back for the Switch successor, and that when SMM3 happens, they bring back everything that made 1 so special and everything that made 2 more expansive. That way we get the best of both worlds, along with the new things 3 will add
There's a degree of wackiness in the original game with crazy sound effects and all sorts of charm. Mario Maker 2 feels more limiting, and the 3d World theme while cool, is ugly af
Yea I get where you’re coming from, I just wanted to say it because I don’t like when people say their opinions as facts when people have that mindset they will have arguments with other people just to prove that there right
Eh SFproductions is a okay TH-camr In my opinion, although I don’t agree with some of his hot takes,I respect his opinion but I still think his content just just average😐🙂
The only real problem with mario maker 2 is just how baby down it is like why can't I customized how quickly enemies throw projectiles like yes it won't change much but options like that would do so much to the game. Yes I know little Timmy would love this but my point still stands.
The features 2 added were too limited and didn't leave for much experimentation. Lava, water, and poison were locked behind two respective themes which removed any possibility to experiment with combinations. The night themes all have the same background and tinny music box music which makes them very unappealing, super Mario 3d world felt very limited as a whole with even less possibilities for experimentation than the other themes. When the game came out, there were barely anything remarkable added either except the slopes, themes and some other smaller things. There were barely any new powerups (not talking about the gimmicky original ones), bosses, enemies or other bigger changes, and felt overall pretty similar to mm1. The game simply didn't have enough new stuff for being a sequel, and the things it did add was mostly too restrictive.
Super Mario Maker 1 was so good, but I always wanted a multiplayer added to the original and maybe even 3ds and Wii u crossplay would’ve made it cooler. It just ended too soon
Great video. You hit the nail on the head. Sometimes more is less. This is the same reason why early seasons of fortnite were far superior in my opinion.
I never played smm1, BUT... smm2 is better just because of that one glitch with a claw and a hammer bro that lets you do insane things (if you know, you know)
Put Sonic the Hedgehog Power-up in Super Mario Maker 2 on All Game Styles Like: 1. Super Mario Bros. 1 2. Super Mario Bros. 3 3. Super Mario World 4. New Super Mario Bros. U 5. Super Mario 3D World
I disagree completely, we need a Mario maker 3 for the switch that has every object obstacle and entity from all the Mario games going back to new super Mario Bros DS
@@SFproductions1 Works perfectly fine for me without any issues. If anything that matter is higly subjective, since it depends on the person's thumb size.
There are few things that first game that didnt get carried over to the sequel and thats it. Obviously the biggest things are spike hitboxes, being able to download the levels, the gamepad being easy for designing levels. And 100 Man. But to ignore how terrible the camera is, and how much stuff in 2 just to say 1 is better is nuts. Just say, why you prefer it instead of saying that 1 is objectively better. Cause it isnt. Both games have flaws when you play it for long enough. But 2 is leagues above 1. Most of the flaws of 2 are from 2s specific content.
100% AGREED mario maker 1 clears 2 Way better tool kit, in mario maker 1 there were no limitations you could stack pipes have shells inside a spring mario maker 2 feels corporate. Mario maker 2 has more items yet less creative options
Honestly i have to agree the amiibos the custom death sounds when someone falls to their death its easier to make levels and more SM2 is still great But SM1 IS SO MUCH BETTER This is a W TAKE
HOW DARE YOU!!! SUPER MARIO MAKER 1 IS NOT BETTER THAN SUPER MARIO MAKER 2 BECAUSE SUPER MARIO MAKER 1 IS FUCKING OVERRATED!!! WHY CAN'T SUPER MARIO MAKER 2 GET SOME LOVE BECAUSE SUPER MARIO MAKER 2 IS REALLY UNDERRATED!!!
I’m just going to stay as a true fact is “more content does not make a game better than others”. Super Mario Maker had an AMAZING experience with than Super Mario maker 2.
It kinda sounds like you prefer maker 1 because of the memories you have made with it
Actually no, I have more memories with the sequel, I just think that the features are better in the first one tbh
Updates. Mario Maker 2 stopped getting updates before MM1 for some reason.
Besides the costumes, SMM2 is clearly better. I wish there would be an SMM3, there isn't enough currently.
@@SylkaChanProbably will happen on Switch successor
I’m sad because I only have Mario maker for the 3DS
Mario Maker 2 should've had the amiibo costumes. It would've been such a good addition.
I agree with you, but having all of them could’ve affected the games memory limit or something.
I guarantee you the reason why they removed them was due to multiplayer. It would be confusing having four players all wearing the Luigi amiibo costume, and if that's why they're removed then honestly I'm glad they were. Proper additional characters and multiplayer is a much better trade off.
They could at least make it as a normal mushroom
I love both of these games and, while I think Mario Maker 2 might be better in terms of content with the world maker, 3D World theme, and multiplayer, Mario Maker just fits perfectly on Wii U with the GamePad. Amiibo costumes were great too, and it was such a special moment experiencing a game like that for the first time...
You know how sucks Wii U Online-Exclusive shutting because there's no amiibo in SMM2
Pretendo is here to save the day.
I can honestly agree since I had more memories on mario maker instead of mario maker 2 and I was 6 crazy how a good game can be in your memory
6:19 When are we getting that spotify release, SF Productions?
Bro's complaining that the sequel has more content. At this point I don't think anything can please this man😂.
im not complaining what
@@SFproductions1 Then what was the point of this video? The sequel is abjectively a better game. Aside from the lack of amibo costumes.
I'm just giving my opinion that's all. You don't have to agree with me
Nintendo should start to listen to their fans
The hell does that have anything to do with this video in question?
You’re right Nintendo should start to listen to their fans.
@@Rediscool9 yeah, the fact that if nintendo listened to their fans they would've known how to make a better game
@@mioarajitca3668
Mario Wonder: 🗿
Tears of the kingdom: 🗿
Mario RPG remake: 🗿
Why should they?
I can definitely see valid reasons why someone would prefer the first over the second. For example, there was more engagement with the community with the first game, they would release their own official levels pretty frequently and this would be how most of the amiibo costumes were unlocked. Things like that really helped grow a community around the game, which is something the second game definitely feels like its lacking especially now in 2024. The gamepad also just felt way nicer to build with, the ui just worked so well. The sanitized charm in SMM2 is also another good argument to make, but there's one argument you raised that I just completely flat out disagree with. SMM2 isnt worse because it has too much content, if anything the game suffers from not having ENOUGH.
The leap from 1 to two in terms of options was definitely a big leap, but it just wasnt big enough in my opinion. A lot of the features that were added were either things that should've been in the first game to begin with, or things being held back by the way they were implemented. The SMB2 gameplay is a perfect example of a good concept held back by execution, sure the game is objectively better for having it due to giving players more ways to spice up their levels, but its just being a power up instead of a full blown style really brings the whole thing down because if you want to design a level around the mario 2 mechanics, you have to constantly put the item everywhere in your level to ensure the player always has it, which just ruins the difficulty of levels in the most place. Another example that comes to mind of good concepts being held back is the fire spitting yoshis. The red yoshi is cool and all, but why just restrict the fire spitting to a specific yoshi? Wouldn't it be way cooler if they just implemented the SMW color coded ability system instead? Adding all four Koopa and Yoshi colors from SMW and have them behave the same way, would give players so many more options for their levels. There's also infuriating restrictions when it comes to what items can be used in what gamestyle *Cough* Fire Bros *Cough* Clear Pipes *Cough*
The lack of options in the first game is more justifiable due to it being the first game and being on an unsuccessful system, but there really was no excuse for this game, especially if there's only one new gamestyle. Limitation does inspire creativity, but there's only so much you can draw with a stick in mud before it dries up. I don't know, maybe I'm just spoiled from SMBX and romhacks, but my biggest issue with SMM2 is that it doesn't feel as innovative as the first, but it's at least a little better than the first due to the added options. 🤷♂️
i think mario maker 3 should either be a 3d engine, or could introduce scripting as well as sprite editing, and really anything else like that if nintendo wants to not have to release another sequel in atleast 10 years
There was a weird tonal shift from 1 to 2 that I've never really seen anyone mention. 1 used to really incentivize self-growth as a maker/player by offering goals you reach on your own, but in 2 it really expects to pit you in a competition. Everything from the gamemodes to medals tied to a leaderboard to the hard as balls achievements you can show off on your mii makes 2 feel more like a popularity contest which just isn't fun. You can even feel it in the levels. Ever wonder why there are so many "refreshing levels"? Clout
Also bring back stacked pipes Nintendo
6:44 …what, the touch screen still works on the switch version though. Idk maybe it's more convenient in the original, I haven't actually made a level in SMM1 for a long time so maybe that's what you're talking about
Nah I like MM2 more. But I hate how they pretty much gave up on updating the game, MM1 got so many updates and had events and stuff. If MM2 got updated at least for another year or two, it would be one of the best Mario games ever made.
I grew up with the 3ds version and I have so many memories with that, but alas, I have even more memories with SMM2, I was so hyped for that game and it's my most played game of all-time (by a large margin, SMM2 on 900+ hours and my second most MK8D is only at 300+ hours), I don't really have any experience with the Wii U version, except from once at a friend's house and a few times on an emulator, but the memories I have with both SMM3DS and SMM2 will make no amount of arguments surpass what these 2 games gave me
Yeah, I agree with the Mystery Mushroom being removed being a problem with the sequel, because although I technically have the first Mario Maker, I have the port that you said you don't talk about (the 3DS one).
I agree, SMM2 just didn't have the same appeal for me, mainly cause the level editing wasn't nearly as intuitive. I had made 75 levels in the first game, and was so excited for 2, and I even bought an amazon stylus that could work with the Switch, but I only ended up making 3 or 4 levels because all the intuitive design had been replaced with menus to manually select everything. Wanna change a koopa's color? You can't just give it a shake, no now you have to hold down on it for a couple seconds to bring up a menu and then select the koopa's color.
Genuinely SMM2 feels soulless compared to the first game. I got my mileage out of playing levels in 2, but the creating part of the game was ruined for me, it was so unappealing.
Ehhhh I personally don’t agree with you of saying SMM2 is soulless, I still think it’s a decent game but I respect your opinion
You spent 10 minutes saying you prefer the first one, but everything you said just gave points to the sequel.
Missing slopes on the original is honestly bad enough that it’s useless.
I never got to experience the "charm" of Mario Maker because I didnt have a Wii U. For me that same charm started with Mario Maker 2 so I never really understood why people loved MM1 over 2 because, like you said, 2 just seemed to have way more content but now I realize that people just feel the exact same way about MM1 that I do for MM2.
I agree with you that SMM1 is better for MAKING levels with the touch screen. But making levels is less than 3% of the time the average players will spend on the games. People will probably make a dozen levels maximum. In that sens, I prefer having more content in the game and bit less intuitive Level Editor. It brings a lot more of variety.
Also, yes... losing 100 Mario challenge and Amiibo costumes is a shame... But I love playing coop with my friend in SMM2!
Simply untrue
Don’t say he’s wrong no opinions are right or wrong, that’s just his opinion.
Now try smm2 with mods. we got two whole new styles, nsmb2 nsmbw
Finally, I’m not alone on this hill. Mario maker 1 is better and I want to play as Sonic in a Mario game again
Mario Maker 2 is a better game on a worse console. Honestly, in terms of graphics and performance the Switch is better, but it lacks charm that the Wii U has and is less convenient (even with it being handheld wherever you go)
Nah Mario Maker 2 is better, improves on the first game in every way. Just because there's less easter eggs and no amiibo costumes doesn't mean Mario Maker 1 is better.
Mario maker one is far less limiting with items and contraptions
@@splaturials9156 It really isn't. Plus, Mario Maker 2 has the SM3DW style, new enemies, new course parts, new everything, new SLOPES, a story mode with actual decent levels, and its online still works lol. How is that not an upgrade in every aspect?
@@splaturials9156 Doesn’t automatically make it a better game. There’s far more to Mario Maker than just making levels believe it or not.
@@Rediscool9Even then, the level playing experience is much better in SMM2. Finding good levels is significantly easier in SMM2 with shorter codes and a more in depth search filter.
Easy, little timmy levels in smm2 are worse
This is a nitpick but it annoys me that you can’t use the night theme in Mario maker 2 without the weird effect that it brings
good points. makes me think of all those homebrew arcade "VS Fighters" created in MUGEN... they were great, but people's character select screens would be ridiculous... character icons the size of a pin and it took forever to find the character you wanted (Marvel Vs. Capcom 2 in the official games to me pretty much hit the limit of having a reasonably large selection that didn't make it ridiculous... because eventually you just want to have a match and not take longer to pick your characters than to have that match that is going to be under 3 minutes)
Nah, both games are just as good as each other, but for different reasons. SMM1 was infinitely more limited in terms of creativity and level creation but had more charm and easter eggs, whereas SMM2 was the opposite. We have many new tools, themes, modes, and additions, but all of the easter eggs and overall charm is gone, and I think this is mostly due to it being on the Switch. I'm hoping we get two screens back for the Switch successor, and that when SMM3 happens, they bring back everything that made 1 so special and everything that made 2 more expansive. That way we get the best of both worlds, along with the new things 3 will add
There's a degree of wackiness in the original game with crazy sound effects and all sorts of charm. Mario Maker 2 feels more limiting, and the 3d World theme while cool, is ugly af
Well that’s your opinion,opinions vary
@@daddydwaved while your comment is right. I still find it a little rude the way you say it
Yea I get where you’re coming from, I just wanted to say it because I don’t like when people say their opinions as facts when people have that mindset they will have arguments with other people just to prove that there right
Banger video as always sf 🔥🔥🔥
You already know 😎
Eh SFproductions is a okay TH-camr In my opinion, although I don’t agree with some of his hot takes,I respect his opinion but I still think his content just just average😐🙂
The only real problem with mario maker 2 is just how baby down it is like why can't I customized how quickly enemies throw projectiles like yes it won't change much but options like that would do so much to the game.
Yes I know little Timmy would love this but my point still stands.
and the worst part of this, to this day, Mario Maker 2 doesn't have any new content or anything new that we know of. Also Mario Maker 3DS GOAT
Mario Maker 2 is better by far
The features 2 added were too limited and didn't leave for much experimentation. Lava, water, and poison were locked behind two respective themes which removed any possibility to experiment with combinations. The night themes all have the same background and tinny music box music which makes them very unappealing, super Mario 3d world felt very limited as a whole with even less possibilities for experimentation than the other themes. When the game came out, there were barely anything remarkable added either except the slopes, themes and some other smaller things. There were barely any new powerups (not talking about the gimmicky original ones), bosses, enemies or other bigger changes, and felt overall pretty similar to mm1. The game simply didn't have enough new stuff for being a sequel, and the things it did add was mostly too restrictive.
Rare SF productions L.
You shouldn’t even count the 3DS port as part of the series. It’s honestly just a demo of the Wii U version.
Can't u just use your wii u stylus to make levels?
It’s crazy how much Nintendo hates Mario Maker 2. Why did it stop getting updated after 2 updates?
There's only one things that's blatantly better on the first 1 and that's downloading levels and editing them
I miss the overlapping pipes because I could make the the big pipes from mario 3 and mario u
Super Mario Maker 1 was so good, but I always wanted a multiplayer added to the original and maybe even 3ds and Wii u crossplay would’ve made it cooler. It just ended too soon
7:24 SMM2's special edition included stylus
Only in Europe
Very rare L take from SF.
I'll still stay subbed though.
Hes right mario maker has far more creative options like overlapping pipes
@@splaturials9156 That doesn’t automatically make the game better
@@Rediscool9 kinda does
@@splaturials9156 Believe it or not, there’s FAR more to Mario Maker than just making levels.
Great video. You hit the nail on the head. Sometimes more is less. This is the same reason why early seasons of fortnite were far superior in my opinion.
6:26 started
Mario Maker getting rid of overlapping pipes for the sequel has got to be the worst mistake in my opinion.
I never played smm1, BUT...
smm2 is better just because of that one glitch with a claw and a hammer bro that lets you do insane things (if you know, you know)
The worst part about MM2 is that it has the best new additions but is still worse than its Wii U predecessor.
How is MM2 worse? It’s better than the original in almost every way
Put Sonic the Hedgehog Power-up in Super Mario Maker 2 on All Game Styles Like:
1. Super Mario Bros. 1
2. Super Mario Bros. 3
3. Super Mario World
4. New Super Mario Bros. U
5. Super Mario 3D World
You can't use the wii u or 3ds anymore.
I disagree completely, we need a Mario maker 3 for the switch that has every object obstacle and entity from all the Mario games going back to new super Mario Bros DS
If there was SLOPES it probably would be better but I only play maker 2 for 3D world mostly
SMM2 is easily the worst of the 3 games. Yes. I prefer the 3DS Port
As much as there is in 2 i agree in 1 you could turn into lanky mario
I wish this was the case for sonic. I would love to make levels in sonic gameplay. I enjoy sonic way of playing levels more then Mario.
Super Mario Maker > Super Mario Maker 2
FINALLY! SOME ONE UNDERSTANDS ME!!!!
Oh?? Okay🤨😅.
"More content does not always equal a better experience."
Let this man cook
The crew ahhhhhh video💀
Mario Maker 2 is still a good game in my point of view
Mario content on Sanic channel?!
look at my pfp lmao
@@SFproductions1 Sonic and Knuckles
@@TheSultan1470 Are you restarted?
@@StickmanGuides I would love to get restarted, yes, but no, I haven't restarted. Sounds like a very refreshing experience.
@@TheSultan1470yoooo my fav game, super knuckles odyssey.
Mario Maker 2 was a big downgrade from the 1st one for me in terms of personal enjoyment. It’s still good tho.
Super Mario Maker had Sonic Amiibo support. WE KNOW WHICH IS THE GOAT NOW!
no
5:45 fin.
Bruh u literally CAN use touch controls in MM2
Brother didn't watch the video
@@SFproductions1 It just works
@@Neoniq41 yeah it works but it's not as good since you don't have a stylus
@@SFproductions1 Works perfectly fine for me without any issues. If anything that matter is higly subjective, since it depends on the person's thumb size.
@@Neoniq41 exactly and this video is entirely subjective lol
There are few things that first game that didnt get carried over to the sequel and thats it.
Obviously the biggest things are spike hitboxes, being able to download the levels, the gamepad being easy for designing levels. And 100 Man.
But to ignore how terrible the camera is, and how much stuff in 2 just to say 1 is better is nuts. Just say, why you prefer it instead of saying that 1 is objectively better. Cause it isnt. Both games have flaws when you play it for long enough. But 2 is leagues above 1. Most of the flaws of 2 are from 2s specific content.
100% AGREED mario maker 1 clears 2
Way better tool kit, in mario maker 1 there were no limitations you could stack pipes have shells inside a spring mario maker 2 feels corporate. Mario maker 2 has more items yet less creative options
Honestly i have to agree the amiibos the custom death sounds when someone falls to their death its easier to make levels and more
SM2 is still great
But SM1 IS SO MUCH BETTER
This is a W TAKE
HOW DARE YOU!!! SUPER MARIO MAKER 1 IS NOT BETTER THAN SUPER MARIO MAKER 2 BECAUSE SUPER MARIO MAKER 1 IS FUCKING OVERRATED!!! WHY CAN'T SUPER MARIO MAKER 2 GET SOME LOVE BECAUSE SUPER MARIO MAKER 2 IS REALLY UNDERRATED!!!
You’re right
Hes wrong
OK, Geez, Relax!
Super Mario Maker 2 Sucks, 1 Is Way Better.
Im sorry smm2 has too much content
Agreed
I’m just going to stay as a true fact is “more content does not make a game better than others”. Super Mario Maker had an AMAZING experience with than Super Mario maker 2.
I get why SMM1 is better than SMM2, because it just feel better, can't wait when SMM3 came out and you would call it the worst game of all time.
bro i never said i disliked mairo maker 2 i still think its great lol so in no way do i think the next game will be bad
Thank you for this video. I thought I was the only one that noticed the downgrade that maker 2 was
What is NOT in mario maker 2 is that you can't play as , samus, kirby heck even SONIC THE HEDGEHOG!!!
I never had either game because they’re too obnoxious
Why would you want less content, if don't mind telling me?🫤
Less is more sometimes
@@SFproductions1 k