Suzuki S-Cross review | Better value than any other crossover?
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 มี.ค. 2022
- #Suzuki #SuzukiSCross #NissanQashqai
| SUPPORT THE CHANNEL LINKS |
Merch store link : shop.spreadshirt.ie/nobby-on-...
This channel is a passion project of mine which has required significant investment in terms of camera equipment, software and my time. If you'd like to support it or sponsor a video, check out the links!
Patreon / nobbyoncars
PayPal paypal.me/noblemark?locale.x=...
Social channels for Nobby - / nobbyfm104
/ nobbyoncars
For sponsorship enquiries or to get in touch; noblem@gmail.com - ยานยนต์และพาหนะ
![2023 Suzuki S-Cross Ultra Review: Good, Honest Value [Car Obsession]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/BB6j4s3vtzE/mqdefault.jpg)
I tell you what, my dad got one of these, pre-lift, and its brilliant runner, nothing ever broke, smooth to drive and easy to live with. The whole family can easily pack for a 2 weeks holiday in it. Just cannot go wrong with it, especially now when car prices went bonkers.
Cheers Nobby!
Manually-operated handbrake and traditional buttons and switches on the dashboard. That's how it should be! Good job Suzuki!
I hv button handbrake in vw Passat and luv it now. I think manual handbrake old fashioned
@@brec5879 it is not matter of fashion
Hate manual handbrake. Electric handbrake so much better.
@@Edvard.Munchkin your opinion, but not true, with MHB you have more contro of the car. But if you use the car to go to supermarket is enough, ja.
@@francmedic7917 What control more does it give you? I have electric handbrake with autohold on a DSG Passat, it's fine. Doesn't release until car has enough power to move forward if you're on a hill or whatever. To apply it, just pull the switch or place shifter in P and turn off engine and it will apply. Extremely easy use. I don't understand what control you need more than that?
Considering suzuki's reputation for solid reliability, this good looking and practical cross over seems to offer fantastic value. The 1.4 turbo from the swift sport is one fine engine with excellent low end torque and high levels of refinement.
Good car - comfortable, simple, reliable!
Adaptive cruise and blind spot for 30k, thats how it should be. Not as premium as the new qashqai but you are probably saving 10k for that.
6-7k anyway
@@NobbyOnCars had a look at the qashqai pricelist, the safety stuff actually comes on the base model whioh is great to see and I wouldnt have expected. 33k approx.
To match the spec of the suzuki there I think you'd need to go to the next model up which is 35.5 for the manual or 39 for the auto.
Weirdly something like heated seats seems to only come as standard on the top spec model. Mad that is.
Qashqai has a decent level of standard stuff now alright but even the second spec up is high 30s.
And nissan (renault) engines probs only cost about a £1000 to build, cheap quality parts and poor design. i would take the suzuki anyday especialy for their engines.
Ride on qashqai is appalling- jiggly
Relatively simplistic in design and appearance..my initial thought on it is was it was similar to a Subaru Forester on the rear and the early Mazda CX-5 from the side. Nice bit of kit. There are lots of customers out there that just want simple. It'll be hard to pass it for value. Ideal tool for the upcoming annual caravan season too. Is there an AWD/4wd version out of interest?
Nice vlog as always nobby.
yes AWD
Hi there I have just purchased one of these exactly the same as the one you're testing is that mine is automatic picking it up this Friday looking forward to owning it. I've had three Suzukis in the past so comparing it to those it should be interesting...cheers Phil from Newark
Great review Nobby as ever tho' the Qashqai much as I'm not a huge fan of it has a little bit more power from a smaller engine 140hp and 160hp from the 1.3 tho' it is probably a little bit more expensive. Apart from that the only thing really that lets it down is the same thing that all Suzuki's suffer from, the interior is very plasticky and cheap looking compared to some of its rivals plus with a screen that size or about 8 inches they could have easily integrated that into the dashboard, not a huge fan of cars witthe screen sitting proud of the dashboard which seems to increasingly be the case.
I have a 2004 suzuki liana estate 1.6. The interior is still solid at 185k miles. No flaking steering wheel, flaking and braking buttons, no seat wear. Compared to my 05 golf, the interior fell to bits and only just over 50k on the clock. I think i get what you mean though, the interior is pretty bland. I think if suzuki cuts down on making too many small compact city cars like alto, celerio, splash ect and add the budget to the interior since they spend most of the money on the engine buying reputable expensive parts.
Boot space litres?
430
What's with the horn? A pity there are no USB sockets in the rear. It is value for money.. is there a diesel version?
No diesels… horn is a bit light eh
@@NobbyOnCars It's a pity there's no diesel version.
there is a cigarette lighter socket in the armrest in the middle
@@Smokeysbandit It's a matter of opinion. I have a diesel car for daily use and buy diesel in bulk. Also, I have a petrol vintage car for occasional use. I would find it hard to change due to limited range of BEVs.
I don't get it is this bigger or smaller than a Vitara?
Christ's sake it's impossible to find a midsize SUV 4x4 manual.
A little bigger
@@NobbyOnCars thanks
Suzuki s cross vs hyundai kona?
Haven’t been in a Kona actually so a little unfair of me to pick, would this have a little more room inside / boot etc ?
Peouget vibes at the back with that light bar like a 2008
That's because Suzuki is part of the Stellantis group and so it'll probably have been designed by the same design house us use some of the PSA group's parts.
@@stevencampbell1150 it’s not a part of the stellantis group but stay safe….
@@colm112 I think you'll find indirectly it is because Suzuki are owned by the Fiat Chrysler group who are part of the Stellantis conglomerate.
@@stevencampbell1150 ya that’s just not true
@@colm112 really? Suzuki are owned by Fiat Chrysler who are part of the Stellantis group! Don't believe me Google it. The engine in this car is a fiat engine. It's the same one in the abarth 500 all be it detuned.
"not quite 6 foot" 🤣
🤫🤣
Good review , I haven’t driven this car but I would be more inclined to opt for the Dacia Duster higher spec models for quite a lot less money same sort of reliability and build quality and a higher ground clearance……
same reliability, you cant be serious
No way to dacia
Hahahahaha same warranty. Dacia 2, Suzuki 6 years. Enough said. Dacia is cheap build quality! Suzuki last and last!
No SatNav ?? Find that hard to believe. Our Swift has it.
Couldn’t find the button for it and it was clearly marked on Swift 🤷🏼
satnav in higher trim level, but why do you need satnav if you can use car play
@@blebull 28/4 22 According to Scotty Kilmer you don't need 'fancy audio systems' either- it's all on your tech appliance & can be hooked up to enhance existing systems. Time for a refresher on U T demonstrating readily available in car features existing on your mobile. P S. Do the headlamps compete with those blindingly ones fitted to the likes of German brands?
This S Cross looks like a Corolla Cross with a Suzuki badge and less warranties..
I can’t see why you’d buy it over a Dacia Duster or Jogger. They do basic better than this. If it was my €30k, I’d skip over these basic SUV’s and buy a Leon, Focus, Octavia etc.
what about safety features? they are the same?