ไม่สามารถเล่นวิดีโอนี้
ขออภัยในความไม่สะดวก
Baldwin Motions Hearings
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 7 ก.ค. 2024
- So, we're going to watch lawyers squabbling and unable to maintain civility towards each other as they argue pre-trial motions in the Baldwin trial.
...so, if you're wondering, that's why the background is cats fighting.
![[ไฮไลต์] ฟุตบอลชาย ญี่ปุ่น vs ปารากวัย รอบแบ่งกลุ่ม | โอลิมปิก 2024](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/X_BeGaAv1oM/mqdefault.jpg)
Too many witnesses??? Lally: "Hold my Beer" 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Lmbo best comment…
I would say FACTS, but I think Lally was double fisting and needed them to hold multiple beers 😂
I worked on the construction of that courthouse for a couple years. A whole other kind of headache than what goes on in it now.
Motions in lemonade have started.😂
I love your snark, Ian.
I'm anti-gun, European, and politically a leftie, so I don't agree with many of your ideas on those subjects but I still watch your content that's non-political for the snark and the runklisms.
Same,I agree from Belgium
Runkle, just so you know, the feed skipped over the defense's argument about the late disclosure issue literally in it's entirety.
It unpaused where the defense rested and the state gets to respond with argument.
Sadly, TH-cam live still does this on occasion for some reason, just jumps up to real time with little indication except a stutter and what gave it away for me was the stutter + Baldwin just took off his glasses and suddenly those glasses were on him as if time had jumped, and it jumped substantially.
You did notice something off but didn't realise this specifically happened.
Just wanted to let you know (if you even do read these comments) so you are aware of that during upcoming live trial (assuming you're gonna be behind on 1.25x or normal speed as much as you can, to skip breaks etc) and so you don't miss these parts. This has happened to Emily D Baker as well, it's unfortunate.
I had to watch this part from the feed itself because it was very interesting and really wanted to hear your thoughts & insights, as a lawyer, on those arguments etc.
In any case, as usual, thanks for the coverage & your breakdowns, really enjoy them, very entertaining!
Something I really want to know about is how relevant the on-set power dynamics matter for legal liability. And accounting for his producer role touches on that but doesn’t quite get to the scope of what I think needs to be addressed.
Because Baldwin had *massive* power on that set, for a lot of reasons. The fact that he was able to misbehave and ignore safety rules without consequences, and the reason he was able to order around the crew and all that, was because of the unique position he had wrt the project.
It was HIS project. He co-wrote it, he was the lead, he was a big part of the potential commercial success of the film, and therefore directly a reason for at least a decent portion of the financing the film received. He had so, so much clout on that set, and treating him as ‘just an actor’ is a really, really inaccurate picture of the dynamic his actions actually occurred in.
I think what im trying to ask is that because of his combination of circumstances, he was both in a position of power and essentially uncheckable on-set, and is that a viable legal argument, and if so how, and if not, why not and what is possible.
Also, personal opinion, the nepotism baby/entitlement narratives about Gutierrez reed were unfair, and are much more accurate applied to Baldwin.
Im at replay and 2,5 hours only, but damn even Kari made me crazy in last trial and is so condecending, but she has so good arguments, is passionate and also NOT A single kinda, sorta, whatifanys! Thank god!! 😂 I think I just have Lally PTSD because after Hannah trial I was like, I cant wait for Balwins lawyers to go after Morissay. Now Im like wuhuu, go Kari and thanks for not being boring at all!!! 😄
Same, I think I would definitely find her tone annoying if I was the judge/defense and I *do* find it annoying when I disagree with her, but as an outside observer I really enjoy the snark when I'm in agreement 😂 and I can always appreciate the passion behind the snark
Same, I think I would definitely find her tone annoying if I was the judge/defense and I *do* find it annoying when I disagree with her, but as an outside observer I really enjoy the snark when I'm in agreement 😂 and I can always appreciate the passion behind the snark
I'm watching on replay & I'm Loving the banter between @Mrs Squirrel & @HonkBananaNo & @Pants volunteering to be the example for @Runkle accident analogies lol - Also @NikkiCrayons - I'll be looking for you on the next Live I catch, EDB/Runkle/L&L to make sure you are safe from the radar red line 🫂 🤗
An audio compressor is a filter that automatically increases low audio and limits loud audio, its perfect for bringing up low volume voice without clipping the audio.
OBS has it in the audio filter menu, I assume stream labs has something similar.
Unfortunately, one of the most common complaints many streamers have with Streamyard is the software’s automated audio processing that gives the streamer very little insight into what their audience is hearing. From what various streamers have said, Streamyard does some sort of post processing which involves attempting to automatically level the volume from multiple sources while simultaneously not giving the streamer an option to hear what their audience is hearing. Based on reading chat of various streamers when these audio issues arise, OBS gives more control to the streamer, more buttons to manage but the ability to have control
I think it is very important that Baldwin was producer. He was using this to intimidate other crew members and as producer he cannot argue "i am just dumb, good looking actor, I just do what others tell me on the set". And I bet they will try to shift blame on Halls, because of his production role... they will try to argue out of both sides of their mouth... I bet we will have some lengthy sidebar about opening the door to this.
And as a producer he should have been aware of previous misfires on the set, which should make him act even more cautious with the guns.
And as a producer he had more motive to rush things, actors usually do not care about timing, it is up to producers to make sure that filming doesnt take any longer than needed.
The transcripts from the sidebars will be soooo interesting
Baldwin was not charged as a producer or actor, but as the guy who shot someone. As such, he was certainly aware of the prior safety incidents on set and that the crew walked out the day before.
Oh my goodness 6 and a half hours
The way I just busted out laughing at 4:04:41 hahahahahaha. I paused to write this and Im pretty sure Ian’s very serious about this but it’s so funny.
AB looks sedated lmao. It’s so bad.
at 1:34 talking about vicarious liability - Baldwin is lucky he did not do the shooting in Australia as - In Australia, company directors can be held criminally liable for the negligence of their employees under certain circumstances, which would have included himself and Hannah, and it seems reckless enough to warrant that charge
Completely off topic - I was just scrolling through my video recommendations and a thumbnail of a Reddit vid posed a question: "Lawyers, what is the strangest law that has won a case for you?"
Runkle, what would be your answer? 🙂
Omg! No admission of baldwins misconduct at a producer. I am not convinced this will be a fair trial.
Baldwin was not charged as a producer or actor, but as the guy who shot someone.
Is anyone else experiencing spikes in volume when Runkle speaks over the video?
I did when I was listening to it live. I broke away and am on replay now...
Yes. It’s because streamyard is trying to automatically level the audio in those moments and it is a problem
I was listening to it through new headphones and thought they were broken at first 🤯
YES 😡. Shocking to the system with headphones. If you're there during the live feel free to let him know next time and do the rest of us rewatch crew a favor.....thanks
Not on replay
Very supportive of the argument that Baldwin as the producer and actor failed the safeties to expediate shooting. Also he's the investor as another reason to cut corners to save money cause it's his payout as well he's protecting.
Plus he was arrogant, lax, loose, overbearing and dismissive. He expected and was doing whatever the hell he wanted no matter what. The definition of a loose cannon.
I think the videos of his behaviour on set should have come in as that was him creating the environment that allowed the incident to happen.
I do think there is an argument with Baldwin's role as a Producer makes him responsible to be more aware of the safety issues and concerns that were being violated than a simple actor. If he was simply an actor, there's an argument that they may not be know of problems on a greater level and couldn't have behaved with the precaution that knowledge may give. To bring this up however, you have to touch on the responsibilities of a producer and what they should have known.
Innately it is a messy web in that Baldwin is an actor and a producer. I don't think you can treat his entire scope as -purely- an actor, I do agree however that it isn't the failings as a producer that matters in this case, that would be the civil, but there is some point of the deeper knowledge he had and ignored.
That is awesome you took off for this case!! I will be watching with you for your Runklisms and expertise in guns 😊 I love your videos.
4:13:17 Runkle, you NEVER get over the love of your life! Even if you remarry after they pass. If Mrs. Runkle passed, would you consider yourself "over her" if you remarried? I highly doubt it. She's your person! That love doesn't just disappear at death!🖤☠🖤
I talked to my wife about that the other day. There is no replacing your "better half."
No no no we love Runkleisms they're very much needed IMO.
About the very end re: disclosure of documents - what we've used in California for 30+ years when we are refusing disclosure on some basis, we provide a log (often called a "privilege log"). All documents are numbered. Any document not disclosed or redacted is listed on the log by number/to-from/date AND basis for redaction or nondisclosure. Game playing is NO BUENO.
Replay crew - it's still so mind boggling to me how much control she has during motion hearings and how much of a shit show the trial got between Morrisey and Bowles
I honestly don’t think Morrisey was doing much wrong and she knew Bowles could have been objecting etc., so she wanted to let it play out and not over control until necessary! Just my two cents.
@@amelia8357 totally agree in that regard. I was more thinking of the early parts where Bowles and Morrissey would just flat out argue with each other directly after an objection. That was chaos into judge made it where they had to go up to the bench for every objection
@@SpicyGoldenRetrieverThat drama sucked for the Judge and the Jury (and the defendant, of course) but it sure was entertaining for the peanut gallery.
@@kassiopiajudkins2722 hahahaha very true 🤣
Look at Baldwin playing the lawyer. What a wanker.
Reminds me of Amber Heard. She wasn't writing anything - just acting.
At first I? was thinking Runkle was being harsh towards the older prosecutor's argument style, however after hearing her make several arguments, I now get it, she does the condescending thing every time. It makes me want to argue against her, even if I agree.
It’s very off putting to listen to. I feel like I’m being talked down to and I hate that!
I'm super excited for Runkle's live streaming, but I really really hope he keeps up the shorter form recaps. I'm not as interested in or have time for every case, especially this one. I have REALLY valued Runkle's recaps to zero in on the most important/impactful parts of the trial day.
5:42:35 - Not quite. She's allowing the letter for impeachement purposes, where the people who signed it are concerned. The only extent to which she said it cannot be used for impeachment, is that the letter cannot be used to impeach someone testifying about how "everyone knew the set was unsafe" if that someone didn't sign the letter saying otherwise.
I assume Baldwin said that he waived appearance because he wanted empty courtroom... but he appeared to check camera angles and maybe gauge the internet response to his wardrobe choice and other optics.
Just finished up with your Karen video 😊on to Baldwin 😊 oh I like Mrs. M 😊Hold My Beer fantastic song 😊 have to be a Canadian 😊
Thanks Runkle, I thought you were going down there.
The guy behind her with the white hair and glasses looked more like Barry Bostwick… lol
At closer look, it is Baldwin
US Army Pamphlet 385-63 specifies SDZ for blanks at 5m. This is considerably more conservative than 'a high probability of injury' but is rather the more convenient 'everyone gets to go home without injury' one appropriate for safety. It is distinctly further than the 2-3 feet that these complacent fools think eliminates all risk. There can be grit or dirt in the barrel from 'acting'. There can be a fragment broken from the crimp of the blank and/or wadding. There is the propellant gas which has a substantial pressure, velocity and temperature, and which often contains solid residues which can cause burns.
There is of course also permanent hearing damage from unprotected discharges - unavoidable in some self defence environments (though blanks would be inappropriate there) but a risk of harm when on a movie set where the producer/actor has a duty of care.
Safety is everyone's responsibility.
🤔 Could someone please explain to me what Baldwin's role as a producer has any bearing on this trial. He pointed a firearm at someone and pulled the trigger. What gives.
It can imply a responsibility over the entire production and everything that happens to the lay person and the prosecution wants that. Judge made the right call to exclude imo. I still think Alec was negligent, but this is a scum prosecution team.
The ability to fire the armorer for the “accidental discharges” that should have led to her being fired
Arguments:
1. He knowingly hired an incompetent armorer because she was cheap.
2. He always got his way because he was the real boss, including
a. Using full load blanks when not required.
b. Always wanting a real gun even for rehearsals.
c. Ignoring safety protocols with impunity.
I like AB female defense attorney forgive me I don’t know her name, she is very well spoken.
I don't recall her last name, but Heather?
Unsure about the manufacturer issue, I've brought plenty of things that were meant to be high quality and they've been rubbish.
"Producer" is to Alec Baldwin as "Kate Moss" is to Amber Heard!!!!!
The sound was wild in this video
Seems to be much better after the recess
I would agree with the producer argument, as a producer you are in a position of power and in the end responsible for things that happen or do not happen on set, even working at one of the major US broadcasters, I as an individual producer was personally liable about any safety that happens on set, you are responsible to voice any concerns and seek to resolve those issues, even if you are not responsible directly for things such as lights, or cameras, or props. As someone in a managing position you are still responsible for the safety of those employed in the crew. Sets are hierarchical for a reason, so anyone who wants to work in the industry long term, will respect and follow those in roles of responsibility.
I feel like the state, unfortunately, didn't articulate this well. I'd guess it's probably because they are deep in this case and didn't seek an outside assessment of their argument for clarity :((
I feel like the state, unfortunately, didn't articulate this well. I'd guess it's probably because they are deep in this case and didn't seek an outside assessment of their argument for clarity :((
I'm at 2 hours, it feels like some missed opportunities on arguing the producer - I'd want to be establishing the point that he had control of the environment such that the armourer, first assistsnt director etc. were hampered in their roles; they could not treat baldwin as just another actor due to his inability or lack of desire to let others lead in their area of expertise. Thus, he cannot be treated by the jury as just an actor - it's more about the environment he perpetuated with this role that directly contributed to the death, not so much that he should have a wealth of knowledge as a producer
The hot sauce may not be a gun, but it was sure loaded
if the state wasnt talking out both sides of there mouth they would of got the producer thing in
5:07:47 safety consultants
K I actually wrote an article about this when it first hit the news so I am coming along for this one!!! Goddam better not end up a hung jury!!! 😂
If the judge allows them to use prosecutors arguments from previous trial. How would that work? Introduce transcript as evidence? Call prosecutor as a witness?
Use the same witnesses!
Judge - “why are you writing documents and then not giving them to me or her?” Wtf? The aggression was so unnecessary. Prosecution wants to hand the judge emails to review and see they aren’t subject to disclosure and then judge immediately says do you have a copy for defense…Judge is doing better than she did in Hannah’s trial, but she still needs to check herself.
lol Runkle look up. Baldwin is sitting at the defense table.
But WHY is the fact that he was producer not being part of this!? This makes him all the more responsible for the tragedy!
James O'Barre. She died from being hit from a drunk driver. It's super sad cause he had a really rough upbringing.
That scene with Travis I am pretty sure was a rubber gun incapable of holding bullets. That was the scene when he gets yanked backwards. Some of the scenes could be that. I don’t know how they can break it down
Runkle, you need a "just the (live bullet) tip" shirt now.
You inspired me to make a whole ass cross stitch pattern of this lmao
@@-c3202 I LOVE THIS used to cross-stitch but it gives me too many sensory issues.
Every time I look at the comments I feel the need to say that I really rather like Morrissey. I think she is effective, easy to understand, competent and easy to listen to. It makes me a bit sad how much flack she gets for her voice, in my opinion there’s nothing wrong with it.
Anyone have time stamps?
The prosecution should have been ready to argue the weight of baldwin as producer with his specific responsibilities where guns are concerned...furthermore baldwin is a seasoned actor in sets working with guns.its not his first rodeo.
3:20:00 Didn't the Ukranian War begin in March 2022 (i.e. 5 months after this occurred)? Or do I have the timeline wrong?
The Russo-Ukrainian War started on February 27, 2014.
Geeze...i hope the prosecution is going to bring a clearer representation of how the gun works and how tight gun safety should be on a set. Mrph.
Lol😊
46:50 nah they kind to had to cuz the d.a did so much in the hanna case and the judge kept letting it happen for way to long till finally doing something i doubt the judge was going do what she did till the defense called the d a on it probly would of let her to keep doing the same shady bull crap
if he was the sole producer maybe he wasn't sole producer or even a actual producer he was a producer in name only ... its a way to pay lead actors more without having other actors saying well he's getting 10 million i should get 2 million ... but hes actually getting 2 million as a actor and 8 as a producer so they turn around and say well no he's getting 2 million so you'll get 400k its all a shell game
No offense, but the audio on this is so low that it’s not worth trying to watch. I have my TV turned up to 60 and I’m still not hearing everything she’s saying.
It seems to be significantly better after recess.
This attorney and the judge look and sound very similar
1:41:55 I think Morrissey is the real boss
runkle u should start selling white shirts with " black letter law" in black lettering lol or any color but make it black letters
the d a in this case is evil they will break any rule they can lie cheat steal they belong in prison
Attorney Bowles was crap. Crap from interviews, during, and after trial.
I am looking forward to sticking it to Attorney Morrissey. She was a bully during Hannah's trial, smug against Bowles.
However, I do think Alec needs to do a little prison time.
Completely agree.
Have to disagree. She was not a bully in the slightest. She was a great lawyer and Bowles could have stopped her at any point had he been as well. This trial will differ as the defence has shown they’ve got just as much skill and push as her.
Alot get that smug attitude of that arrogant pos. Hopefully it will bankrupt him if he gets away with it. Unfortunately he will walk.
@@amelia8357 A witness literally said yes when asked if Morrisey told them what to say, she constantly made comments in front of the jury that were absolutely inappropriate, doxed people, and even her tone were all reasons she is being accused of misconduct. When you have knowledge of what lawyers should and shouldn’t do, you see things differently. I think the jury got it right, but I don’t agree Morrisey prosecuted that case with any integrity.
✝️🦓🥄
Didn’t Halls also work on The Crow? Seems like he’s cursed….
🤦 David Halls was 13 years old when The Crow was filmed.
Maybe this is a stupid question: is there a difference between how you check a gun for blanks and how you check a gun for real ammunition?
Not a stupid question but no there is not a difference - if you are checking for it to be unloaded it should be empty - ideally if you want to know there should be rounds there but need to know if they are dummies or blanks they should be visually marked i.e. no primer or crimped ends or each individually checked i.e. with a ball inside and rattling them
In the gun live and blanks would look similar. If out of the gun you can see that a blank has a crimped end because the projectile has been removed. Blanks of course will make a bang because they still have gunpowder. Then there are dummies which have the gun powder removed, but still have the projectile at the end. They usually put bb's in dummies so you can tell by shaking them if they are dummies. You will see a dimple on the primer of a dummy which can be seen while in the gun.
its surprising to me runkle doesn't think his role as a producer really matter much. Because I'm thinking to myself that if he was just a regular actor I probably don't think he did enough wrong to be given jail time
Baldwin was not charged as a producer or actor, but as the guy who shot someone.
@@charliefoxtrot5001 being the owner of a place with serious safety concerns should be important if later someone died because of safety concerns
@@kavinh10 That's a matter of civil liability, not criminal liability. OSHA has already found that the Rust movie set was unsafe and the Rust production has been fined $100,000.
Got rid of the person who wrote this 5:26:45
5:10:30 what are you talking about?? Morrissey isn't even bringing up guns or shooting, she's talking about Baldwin's complete lack of respect for safety in general. Why are you bringing up guns and shooting people??
I'll admit I'm very shallow. That said, this judge is a little more attractive than the Read trial.
%:39:40 and this is why more and more of the public are turning on district att and law enforcement yall talk out both sides of your mouth and will twist anything to win ..facts are facts but not if your a district att i guess
I cannot stand Morrisey. I always just want her to stop talking as soon as she starts. She’s so freaking condescending and unnecessarily sarcastic.
It’s drives me nuts
This prosecution team is absolute garbage and I can’t stand Morrisey. I don’t like this judge either although she is doing better this time so far. The bs the prosecution got away with in Hannah’s trial is disgusting. Very impressed with the defense team.
My issue with the producer theory is just that I grew up watching behind the scenes extras from Lord of the Rings and I'm keenly aware that a movie can have dozens of producers that all have wildly different roles. This can include people who work on the design side and are never on set, and people with money who aren't even on the same continent. Obviously Baldwin was on set, but that doesn't mean he had any producing related duties at that time. Does being a producer give him more authority? Sure, but does it make him actively in charge of how safety procedures are run, no--at least not necessarily.