How Far Will the EX30 Go? Testing the Efficiency of This Mini-SUV
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 4 มี.ค. 2024
- What do you think about the numbers?
Get free benefits when buying a Tesla: ts.la/william89094
Let me know if you buy a Tesla with my referral and I will give you a shout out!
Pure driving and no-talking videos: / @pureroaming
Music is from the fantastic artists on Epidemic Sounds.
Graphics are made by me, please contact if you are interested in buying graphics.
Thumbnails are made from actual self produced video content, but might include additions, edits and styling.
#ex30 #volvo #range - ยานยนต์และพาหนะ
![[LIVE] ย้อนวันวานกับนางเอกยุค 90's #คุยให้เด็กมันฟัง EP.42 (8/6/67)](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/MslQDdFwULE/mqdefault.jpg)
Had similar circumstances yesterday with Model 3 Highland RWD. It was 9 degrees, av. speed 90 km/h, without pre-heating. Consumption 138 wh/100km. So 66% higher consumption. Let's wait for the single motor test.
Are you sure the front motor is permanent one ? I wonder if the car heat the battery for some reason all the time so the consumption is so high
Hi! Thanks for the video. Is there anyway to repeat the test with a single motor? I know it’s not as aerodynamic and it could be and that’s a lot of it but I’m curious how much better it would be.
I’ll get a hold of the single motor once it’s in production and available 👍🙌
Great video!
I think the front motor was engaged at some point. If you were driving in standard mode, the car will be using both motors with that speed. Eco mode will be using just the rear one all the time.
Thank you! I test all cars this way. Even if Eco-mode uses only the rear motor, you will have some loss in the front motor due to the permanent magnet design.
@@RoamingNorway
For sure dual motor will be less efficient in eco mode than a single motor in eco mode, but I don't think the difference will be that big. Haven't tested it yet. My car is coming in a month and a half.
There is no eco mode in a EX30.
In the performance you can however have the front motor not always on. But it will engage if you for example dona kick down.
Please test single motor with 19 inch wheels
4:32
You are able to set a "Dynamic Range" which takes into account driving style etc. So there is both options.
I know. It is a guess-o-meter, which I do not like. I like rated range (or even better, percantage).
@@RoamingNorway there is that option as well..
@@RoamingNorway So what is the most real "certified" or "dynamic"
None are. But rated(certified) is consistent. Dynamic will tell you that you can't make it when you are climbing a hill. @@kanalkridt123
It is unfortunate that many range tests currently do not clearly declare the range achieved as winter range, as if this is the real maximum range. Some of us also have summer. And not for too short a time.
Sure, but with an already heated cabin and 9 degrees celsius, there is only a minor imrovement(if any at all) up to summer temps. The main improvement will be summer tires. This is just to compare it to two vehicles that was tested in the exact same way.
14:00 same temperature on Tesla test?
wow, so a third more expensive to run than a tesla model 3
In these conditions, yes.
I heard that Volvo gives you total consumption whereas Tesla gives you only motor consumption. If this is true you couldn’t compare your numbers, it isn’t ?
Tesla does, but only when it’s moving. That’s why I only measure in movement.
What do you mean? Maybe you should divide kWh charged to km travelled
You mean that at the end of the trip Tesla gives you consumption data including other minor consumptions? Are you sure? Looks odd if it is
@@GobbotronicoTesla does not show everything taken from battery as wh/km. I saw this on my brothers MY after he had a long drive (600km) in minus 10. His Tesla showed average consumption as 220wh/km for the whole trip. But when he checked his loading stats he calculated that he charged 250wh/km into the battery and with charging loss (the amount he paied for) it was almost 300wh/km. One person stated to him that battery heating is not showed in Tesla as wh/km and that was the difference between 220 and 250. Could confirm with another youtuber when he drove a MY in minus 15 (not preheated) the car claimed about 220wh/km but the battery dropped by amount of 260wh/km...So these kind of efficiency test doesnt work unless every car reports the same way. Battery life (German YT) has started with comparing tests when he and the other car drives at the same time and he also shows the values after charging and the difference between cars is very small. More test like that is needed to show correct data.
Thanks Tobias for your comment, this is exactly what I meant.
Why are you blurring the speed? If you keep 110km/h constant you shouldn't hide anything, don't you?
Yes.
@@slanecek yes... What? 🤔 Is there anything to hide? Is it prohibited to run 110km/h on that road?
It's 110km on his phones GPS. The car is probably over reporting, so it's closer to 115 or something. 110 will be the speed limit. Just being careful.
You are trusting the consumption on the car system.
Without charging the car you don't really know the true numbers.
You are trusting the consumption on the car system.
Without charging the car you don't really know the true numbers.