What I like about Japanese movies is that their sequels have interaction with the previous characters. In Ringu 2 the scene of the well is better understood and why Sadako did not attack her. Ring 2 was not that good but this scene is acceptable.
It's unfortunate Nakata didn't get to make the film he wanted to with The Ring Two, allegedly dreamwork execs kept forcing him to change certain scenes as well as muscling their way into other areas, apparently it was so bad that Nakata said he wouldn't want to film another film in the US ever again under the system.
NOT SURPRISING! That’s pure EVIDENCE Hollywood was WAY too over confident after their success of Ring 2002. What the point of inviting the franchise CREATOR only to barely give him any creative control? They got What was coming for them when Ring 2 flopped. The Ring franchise deserved so much better and o knew it felt weird that it flopped too soon. Now I know why and now I know why so many foreign execs dislike Hollywood.
This is the perfect example of networks/execs not listening to the creators of shows/franchises. Nick did this with SpongeBob too. The creator wanted it to end in 2004 so it wouldn’t jump the shark but they didn’t listen to him. All these companies are the same. Just money money money.
Shame Nakata gets the blame but it’s not your fault you don’t know that Nakata was barely allowed to have any creative control over Ring 2 and that’s why it flopped. It’s the US execs fault
@@MASAHIRO-X- true. Ok so the well scene and possession scene are good but everything else they changed. That’s why ring 2 flipped becuase they barely gave the Japanese creator any creative control
I love Japanese horror movies but I gotta admit,the "well" scene from The Ring scared the heck out of me as a child and i still get anxious whenever I'm watching it
This honestly makes me appreciate The Ring Two more. I mean, it's still not a GOOD movie, but I can see that some improvements were made over the Japanese version. Although I can definitely understand complaints of the American version being overstylized (but Nakata directed it, so...)
@@mrcinefilogeekenlosmultiun3037 I didn't understand somethings you said, but no, The Ring Two's final scene is NOT cgi, Samara's movements are real. Her actrees is a contorcionist. And there are only 2 jumpscares, one is good ("I've found you"), the other is bad (bathroom), but as a whole The Ring 2 is great. Ringu 2 also has cgi and jumpscares, Ringu 2 is not as good as the american version.
@Felipe Gomes in Ringu 2, the light is literally wide open in the entire well, you can see the water, Sadako, rocks, May and Yoichi as if they were in daylight. In the American version it is darker, because they are inside a WELL, besides being more realistic, it's much more frightening to see that child making non-human movements and persisting with the climb.
I gotta go with ringu 2 on this one for a couple of reasons. One it's actually more frightening to me . Two it feels more real which in sure because of the normal movement. And three it's not funny. That last line in ring 2 had a comedic effect on it which kinda kills the whole purpose of running away.
the normal movment feels less real beacause a living people moves like that,but the movment of the girl in the ring 2 is more real because paranormal appearances have to move like that,cause is somthing sobrenatural,and yes there is a thing so funny,but in ringu2,and this thing is the face of the girl,it seems like a face made of paper and glu,dont fuck,this jappanese movies make me laugh
I don't mean to sound whiny, but I think Sadako climbs a bit too slow in the original, while in the remake it's a bit too much. If it had been like in the original, only that she climbs a bit faster, it would been much scarier.
@@AtticusHimself Samaras “mommy” voice creeped me out I was expecting the little girl voice. It’s easy to laugh since it’s movie but if this girl was real with THAT voice, wouldn’t you run away? Lol
@@lessismore8533 People react differently to the same thing, it's almost as if movies and art are a subjective experience that everyone enjoys differently. Shocker!
Well, Samara died with 8-10 yeaes old, near to 1979, and The Ring Two takes place six mounths after the first, so... 2002 or 2003... I think it was more than 6 years. Sadako spent 30 years ALIVE inside of the well, but her spirit escaped in a short time. Samara died after seven days inside of the well and her spirit was stuck in there... since 1979... Yeah :/
@@mieshocked1450 Sadako spent 30 years? Man why did the US version change so much? Also how did you know this info about Sadako? Is it from one of the Ringu books!
@@lessismore8533 Yeah, 30 years. If i'm not wrong this is only revealed in the Rasen novel. The novels are much worse and ridiculous than the Japanese movies adaptations (the loyal ones, I mean). And it's easy to answer why the American Remake changed it, because they were aware of how sh*tty Sadako's novel story was, this is why the American Remake is much better, specially when it comes to the laughable Japanese sequels. Even 1998s Ringu changed almost completely the novel.
The Japanese version is way better, tbh I only saw the Japanese ones and planned to watch the american versions this week, but when I saw this comparison I decided to not. Thank you for the video
I need help. I bought a Samsung 60inch tv fairly new so I don't think there's anything wrong with it. But to this day the girl still doesn't come out of my tv. I've changed the HDMI cable twice and I've done all the updates correctly but still no girl. It won't even turn on by itself unless I do it with a remote. Every time I do turn it on I just see the menu screen and no static. My wife said it worked once for her but only the girl's finger came through (I still have them) before the tv went back to normal. I called Samsung and geek squad but they've been useless just telling me to restart it. What else can be done except restart my tv?!
I may suggest trying with S-VHS cable, but personally I prefer classic Scart M cable (depends on your tv input ). When you launch your favorite Cursed Videotape it gives a nice glitch pattern when Sadako tries to enter to your room, pretty decent atmosphere I’d say.
Nakata still regretted his decision to work with US execs. He should’ve stayed in Japan’s becuase they BARELY gave him any creative control. I guess the only thing he liked, as you said, were the graphics
I love the originals, but the remakes with the new tech and effects make it super cool. Both are great, but these newer ones seem spookier than the originals.
Both might have been directed by the same person, but it's obvious they didn't had the same audience in mind. Is basically an action scene with a gosth, they even have the ball to drop a shitty one liner.
@@justdan9264 I’m really not sure some people say it’s because she never fully saw the tape at all and every moment she was close to she stopped right away. Another reason might the the spirit of ryuji absorbed some Sadako’s powers and his son anger and fears, so in some sense that weakened her. As he’s a good spirit and Sakado the opposite.
The "I'm not you F'ing mommy" is so uncalled for. It's on the level of an action-hero one-liner, but we're supposed to be in a scary creepy movie. Saying nothing would have been chilling, just hearing Sammara calling for her mother, but that line turns it into a "wow so cool" moment that ruins the creepy factor.
I think the ringu 2 is better than ring 2 - the movement of the ghost is slower, mking it more tense, and also the character has a more terrified facial expression.
Ahhh from the family that made the atomic bomb. Got stuck sitting on a sidewalk once saying, "I'm not your fucking Mommy." Then stopped. What was that? It'll never get better.
I saw the Japanese ringu 1, 2 and 0 first before I've had watched the Japanese and I must say that these movies FOR ME are much better then the american. It's a good example that the american "The Ring" movies are a try for an 1:1 copy (but they failed completely). In the american version Samara had a face - Sadako never needed one. And the "cursed video", sorry, but the american one is nearly silly.
It's kind of funny how easily the woman in The Ring can climb barehanded up out of the well so quickly that she successfully outruns an actual ghost, no rope or anything. Ironic that Samara couldn't climb out and save her own life lol
this is why i dislike the remake. mainly not even cuz it's less creepy but the fact that some things really make no sense. like why on earth would samara chase rachel in a hostile way when she showed a copy of a tape to someone else? like her curse was literally lifted so at that point samara should leave her alone and terrorize somebody else who is still cursed. no? meanwhile in the original it's logical that the person that sadako would still have a reason to attack is not reiko (the protagonist of the previous movie) but the new main character mai. but even with her, she doesn't actually harm her since mai have not seen the whole tape. i 100% bet you that this sceneario in the westernized version mai would have been killed for no reason, just to get more "edgy" points which the american rings loves to do a lot. but now that we're talking about "edginess", another thing that confuses me is why does samara climb like a fckin monkey? sure lots of thing don't make sense in supernatural horror but to me it still comes off as if the directors were trying to be as scary as possible and yet failing at it cuz honestly nothing tops the way sadako's voice sounds muffled when she speaks, cuz it reminds you that the face you see isn't really her face but the face they were trying to reconstruct over her skull. i love creepy details like that, like that's peak horror! that's real cinema right there!
She wanted to see yoichi(the child on her back) she closed her eyes not to kill them or wore the mask the guy threw in the lake which is her facial copy, sadako hasn't experienced love on her childhood, yoichi's story is an opposite of sadakos childhood ,
They should have just gone with the Japanese Ring and not made any sequels. The story was complete as it was, with Reiko speeding towards her parents' house with the cursed video. Once you overexploit it, the concept falls apart.
there's no comparison one was made in 1999 and the other 2005 technology was behind in 99 than 2005 special effects were different but as far as how it was written i believe 99 was way better and more believable the ending way better
I hate the 2005 version The fact that the ghost didnt attacker her, just take a look at the child is MEANFUL for the lore, in the 2005 version look more a Final fight against a monster The potray the ghost as a horrible evil monster defeated from the "heroine", instead of a tragic monster with a doomed and sad fate And that "Im not your fucking mommy" in 'cool and strong american protagonist style' JUST RUIN THE VIBES, WHY CANT SHE JUST SHUT UP?!
Yh me to because ring 2 has more next gen background and preferable than ringu,and by the way sadaka did not attack her but comes to ring 2 what if Samara could have held her and grabbed her through the well😂it will be rip for her lol u Kno what I mean
Funny how it’s the same director but the remake feels so ”hollywood” and that’s why I prefer the original. In the remake Samaras movements seem way too over the top for me to enjoy. The original is just enough realistic to give me the creeps. And I like that we never actually saw her face but the reconstruction
I won’t lie I like Samaras crawl in the remake MUCH better. Sadako barely moved. But overall Japanese version of Ringu 2 is superior as US changed too many things
I feel like the ring 2 didn't feel right. It was missing something. I didnt like it bc of the boring scenes and new areas. I feel soo bad for hideo for not making the film he wanted😕
I only like Ringu and Ringu 0. Ringu 2 and Rasen have thier problems but still better than the American remakes and recent sadako 3D films. Just like Ju on they should of quit while they were ahead
I love the original Sadako but the American version is way more scarier. If y’all say the Japanese version is more scary than you just biased or plain dumb.
The Ring Two is *waaaay* better, not only this final scene, the whole movie is better. Ringu 2 is not bad, but is more or less, it could be way better.
Sadako is better than Samara, because from the beginning she was kind and not selfish like Samara. You should remember that Ringu is scarier in that it is realistic, everyday, the colors are very bright, the feeling of reality is scary, making us feel like it will happen to us, while The Ring is sci-fi style. So, because it is not realistic, is less haunting. It should be noted that Sadako crawled slower than Samara, which is reasonable, her dress was very loose so it was likely heavy due to water, hindering her speed, which also shows how difficult it was for her to walk. climbing out of the well. As for Samara, she climbed so fast, so why couldn't she escape the well? I like Sadako better, she is clearly better than Samara in every aspect.
What I like about Japanese movies is that their sequels have interaction with the previous characters. In Ringu 2 the scene of the well is better understood and why Sadako did not attack her. Ring 2 was not that good but this scene is acceptable.
may i ask why did she not attack her?
@@amazemek for what Mai Takano now contac direct with the curse of sadako
why was she not attacked by Sadako?
Thanks
@@mrcinefilogeekenlosmultiun3037 could you rephrase that statement please. Or do it in your first language and I’ll translate . Thanks
It's unfortunate Nakata didn't get to make the film he wanted to with The Ring Two, allegedly dreamwork execs kept forcing him to change certain scenes as well as muscling their way into other areas, apparently it was so bad that Nakata said he wouldn't want to film another film in the US ever again under the system.
Lo mismo le pasó a takashi Shimizu en the grudge 1y2
NOT SURPRISING! That’s pure EVIDENCE Hollywood was WAY too over confident after their success of Ring 2002. What the point of inviting the franchise CREATOR only to barely give him any creative control? They got What was coming for them when Ring 2 flopped. The Ring franchise deserved so much better and o knew it felt weird that it flopped too soon. Now I know why and now I know why so many foreign execs dislike Hollywood.
If Samara were real she would eat those execs up.
This is the perfect example of networks/execs not listening to the creators of shows/franchises. Nick did this with SpongeBob too. The creator wanted it to end in 2004 so it wouldn’t jump the shark but they didn’t listen to him. All these companies are the same. Just money money money.
Nakata is the freaking creator of the franchise. You order him around? Then you fail. And they failed.
Hideo Nakata really did make a completely different film. The Ring Two only lifted one scene from Ringu 2.
More then that actually
Thanks
Shame Nakata gets the blame but it’s not your fault you don’t know that Nakata was barely allowed to have any creative control over Ring 2 and that’s why it flopped. It’s the US execs fault
The original US Ring already had several scenes from the Japanese sequel
Both directed by Hideo Nakata
Yup but Nakata wasn’t allowed to have much creative control in the US version. No wonder Ring 2 flopped
It's super cool seen. I can see why they wanted to have it in the remake (even though the overall plot was completely different)
the possession of the child character is still similar tho
both Yoichi and Aiden are starting to be possessed by Sadako and Samara respectively
Yup. That’s cus Hollywood did NOT listen to the creator of the franchise. No wonder Ring 2 was bad
@@MASAHIRO-X- true. Ok so the well scene and possession scene are good but everything else they changed. That’s why ring 2 flipped becuase they barely gave the Japanese creator any creative control
I love Japanese horror movies but I gotta admit,the "well" scene from The Ring scared the heck out of me as a child and i still get anxious whenever I'm watching it
Well scene scared me too
How old were you?
This honestly makes me appreciate The Ring Two more. I mean, it's still not a GOOD movie, but I can see that some improvements were made over the Japanese version. Although I can definitely understand complaints of the American version being overstylized (but Nakata directed it, so...)
@Felipe Gomes yes Nakata in ringu two is horror Nakata in the ring two is cgi and jumpscarys winn ringu two
The Ring Two is a GREAT movie :)
@@mrcinefilogeekenlosmultiun3037 I didn't understand somethings you said, but no, The Ring Two's final scene is NOT cgi, Samara's movements are real. Her actrees is a contorcionist. And there are only 2 jumpscares, one is good ("I've found you"), the other is bad (bathroom), but as a whole The Ring 2 is great. Ringu 2 also has cgi and jumpscares, Ringu 2 is not as good as the american version.
@@mieshocked1450 Ring 2 (1999) was also directed by Hideo Nakata
@Felipe Gomes in Ringu 2, the light is literally wide open in the entire well, you can see the water, Sadako, rocks, May and Yoichi as if they were in daylight. In the American version it is darker, because they are inside a WELL, besides being more realistic, it's much more frightening to see that child making non-human movements and persisting with the climb.
I gotta go with ringu 2 on this one for a couple of reasons. One it's actually more frightening to me . Two it feels more real which in sure because of the normal movement. And three it's not funny. That last line in ring 2 had a comedic effect on it which kinda kills the whole purpose of running away.
I personally didn’t laugh at the “I’m not your mommy “ line. Humor is subjective. I was too busy being creeped out by Samaras creepy voice.
@@lessismore8533same like i never found it funny cuz it actually gave me an unsettling feeling
the normal movment feels less real beacause a living people moves like that,but the movment of the girl in the ring 2 is more real because paranormal appearances have to move like that,cause is somthing sobrenatural,and yes there is a thing so funny,but in ringu2,and this thing is the face of the girl,it seems like a face made of paper and glu,dont fuck,this jappanese movies make me laugh
I don't mean to sound whiny, but I think Sadako climbs a bit too slow in the original, while in the remake it's a bit too much. If it had been like in the original, only that she climbs a bit faster, it would been much scarier.
Well i mean when she walks out of the tv screen in ringu shes a snail
Ok but why would you be whiny for commenting this? There is nothing wrong at all
Now the's remakes abused of screamers and jumpscarys this is cliché the version japans is more horror
@@mrcinefilogeekenlosmultiun3037 Yes, but The Ring was different from this ;)
@@mieshocked1450 ok 👍😎
Such a shame that the sequel didn't live up to the first movie.
Yes it did. 😂
Yah that’s because Hollywood barely have Nakata any creative control over his OWN franchise. That’s Hollywood for ya
Japanese one did
American one uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
when horror movies actually scared people instead of making them laugh
lmao yes, The Ring and The Ring Two were excellent!!
Actually I laughed my ass off at the "Mommyyyyyyyyyyy" bit xD
And if modern horror like The Witch or Hereditary makes you laugh more power to you
@@AtticusHimself Samaras “mommy” voice creeped me out I was expecting the little girl voice. It’s easy to laugh since it’s movie but if this girl was real with THAT voice, wouldn’t you run away? Lol
@@lessismore8533 People react differently to the same thing, it's almost as if movies and art are a subjective experience that everyone enjoys differently. Shocker!
I remember the sleepless nights as a child
😂😂
On the 2005, Samara is like a human spider or somehow became a monster while she was in the well for like 6 years, man so creepy
Well, Samara died with 8-10 yeaes old, near to 1979, and The Ring Two takes place six mounths after the first, so... 2002 or 2003... I think it was more than 6 years.
Sadako spent 30 years ALIVE inside of the well, but her spirit escaped in a short time. Samara died after seven days inside of the well and her spirit was stuck in there... since 1979... Yeah :/
@@mieshocked1450 Sadako spent 30 years? Man why did the US version change so much? Also how did you know this info about Sadako? Is it from one of the Ringu books!
@@lessismore8533 Yeah, 30 years. If i'm not wrong this is only revealed in the Rasen novel. The novels are much worse and ridiculous than the Japanese movies adaptations (the loyal ones, I mean). And it's easy to answer why the American Remake changed it, because they were aware of how sh*tty Sadako's novel story was, this is why the American Remake is much better, specially when it comes to the laughable Japanese sequels. Even 1998s Ringu changed almost completely the novel.
@@lessismore8533 That information was given in Ringu 2.
@@mieshocked1450 Yeah the books are kind of insane lol
Amazing I love both versions
Me too!!
Unpopular opinion, but this time I liked The Ring 2 more than the original one.
The Japanese version is way better, tbh I only saw the Japanese ones and planned to watch the american versions this week, but when I saw this comparison I decided to not. Thank you for the video
I love your profile pic
@@James-Sunderland010 ahh, you are my phone and pc wallpaper
@@florin9738 that's epic :)
I’ll be honest o like Samaras creepy crawling better than Sadakos. BUT the Japanese version has a better jumacare
Lol, deciding one is better without watching the other. Ok.
the Japanese version focuses on acting, the other on visual effects
The ring did focus on acting too
Focused on acting? Did they focus on filming a movie too?
I need help. I bought a Samsung 60inch tv fairly new so I don't think there's anything wrong with it. But to this day the girl still doesn't come out of my tv. I've changed the HDMI cable twice and I've done all the updates correctly but still no girl. It won't even turn on by itself unless I do it with a remote. Every time I do turn it on I just see the menu screen and no static. My wife said it worked once for her but only the girl's finger came through (I still have them) before the tv went back to normal. I called Samsung and geek squad but they've been useless just telling me to restart it. What else can be done except restart my tv?!
you sane!!!
I may suggest trying with S-VHS cable, but personally I prefer classic Scart M cable (depends on your tv input ). When you launch your favorite Cursed Videotape it gives a nice glitch pattern when Sadako tries to enter to your room, pretty decent atmosphere I’d say.
that creepy wax face is scarier
I preferred 2005 version
I preferred 1999 version
I preferred both
@@studentofmisery2110 me too
The Ring 2 & Ringu2 🇯🇵🇺🇸
I subscribed to you, you are doing a great job
Thank you! ^^
Stop complaining that the one who got excited about the technology applied in Hollywood was Hideo Nakata.
Nakata still regretted his decision to work with US execs. He should’ve stayed in Japan’s becuase they BARELY gave him any creative control. I guess the only thing he liked, as you said, were the graphics
I love the originals, but the remakes with the new tech and effects make it super cool. Both are great, but these newer ones seem spookier than the originals.
Both might have been directed by the same person, but it's obvious they didn't had the same audience in mind. Is basically an action scene with a gosth, they even have the ball to drop a shitty one liner.
Sadako's face is nothing compared to samara's lmao
@YTPooper XYZ we have both very different opinions on what's scary, cause sadako's is 19378347298 times scarier for me
Samara is cute compared to Sadako
@@juliusbautista6244 Samara American Version Sadako
@@juliusbautista6244 lies
@@hannibalgirl666 Yeah same, seeing her clay like skin disturbs me waaay more than Samara
0:59 how did she survive sadako
She now contac whith the curse of sadako
I still don't get it. Why don't Sadako just kill her
@@justdan9264 I’m really not sure some people say it’s because she never fully saw the tape at all and every moment she was close to she stopped right away. Another reason might the the spirit of ryuji absorbed some Sadako’s powers and his son anger and fears, so in some sense that weakened her. As he’s a good spirit and Sakado the opposite.
Is it just me or the sounds overlap beautifully?? Like 80s slasher film vibe all over..
It would’ve been so much better if they kept sadako in the American version
Samara in The Ring 2 (US) looks creepier crawling up than Sadako, but I never got to see a lot of Japanese horror movies.
Aw man you cut out the freakiest part in the American sequel, when Samara jolts up out of the water a 2nd time with the music sting
Next video can u do a tale of two sisters
the japanese version is more realistic, but the american version is better
Directed by Hideo Kojima
Samara voice when she says mommy in the end sounds like a truck horn
Yes or a TRAIN lol but it still creeped me out . I didn’t expect her to talk or have that voice
Do Ringu Spiral and Rings comparison
The "I'm not you F'ing mommy" is so uncalled for. It's on the level of an action-hero one-liner, but we're supposed to be in a scary creepy movie. Saying nothing would have been chilling, just hearing Sammara calling for her mother, but that line turns it into a "wow so cool" moment that ruins the creepy factor.
I think the ringu 2 is better than ring 2 - the movement of the ghost is slower, mking it more tense, and also the character has a more terrified facial expression.
I think... the faster movement make the scene more tense thanks to this "Race against death"
@@HappyLuchoX exactly! Finally that’s what I was saying!
Ahhh from the family that made the atomic bomb. Got stuck sitting on a sidewalk once saying, "I'm not your fucking Mommy." Then stopped. What was that? It'll never get better.
do both movies share the same plot??
Ringu 2 >>> The Ring 2. It always gonna stay like this
I only agree because US execs barely let Nakata have any creative control. US deserved to flop. But I like Samaras crawling better
ringu 2
The jp one is fucking eerie wtf
I saw the Japanese ringu 1, 2 and 0 first before I've had watched the Japanese and I must say that these movies FOR ME are much better then the american. It's a good example that the american "The Ring" movies are a try for an 1:1 copy (but they failed completely). In the american version Samara had a face - Sadako never needed one. And the "cursed video", sorry, but the american one is nearly silly.
It's kind of funny how easily the woman in The Ring can climb barehanded up out of the well so quickly that she successfully outruns an actual ghost, no rope or anything. Ironic that Samara couldn't climb out and save her own life lol
why is it only you were saved?
this is why i dislike the remake. mainly not even cuz it's less creepy but the fact that some things really make no sense. like why on earth would samara chase rachel in a hostile way when she showed a copy of a tape to someone else? like her curse was literally lifted so at that point samara should leave her alone and terrorize somebody else who is still cursed. no? meanwhile in the original it's logical that the person that sadako would still have a reason to attack is not reiko (the protagonist of the previous movie) but the new main character mai. but even with her, she doesn't actually harm her since mai have not seen the whole tape. i 100% bet you that this sceneario in the westernized version mai would have been killed for no reason, just to get more "edgy" points which the american rings loves to do a lot.
but now that we're talking about "edginess", another thing that confuses me is why does samara climb like a fckin monkey? sure lots of thing don't make sense in supernatural horror but to me it still comes off as if the directors were trying to be as scary as possible and yet failing at it cuz honestly nothing tops the way sadako's voice sounds muffled when she speaks, cuz it reminds you that the face you see isn't really her face but the face they were trying to reconstruct over her skull. i love creepy details like that, like that's peak horror! that's real cinema right there!
Why didn't Sadako attack her? I don't understand.
Lore reasons
She wanted to see yoichi(the child on her back) she closed her eyes not to kill them or wore the mask the guy threw in the lake which is her facial copy, sadako hasn't experienced love on her childhood, yoichi's story is an opposite of sadakos childhood ,
Yes sadako/samara is my favorite demon 😂
Sadako: Mommy!
Me:im not ur ******* mommy
This is Samara now Sadako
This is Samara 😂
Sadako don't said
They should have just gone with the Japanese Ring and not made any sequels. The story was complete as it was, with Reiko speeding towards her parents' house with the cursed video. Once you overexploit it, the concept falls apart.
there's no comparison one was made in 1999 and the other 2005 technology was behind in 99 than 2005 special effects were different but as far as how it was written i believe 99 was way better and more believable the ending way better
Do Rasen vs Ringu Two
I think the US version is way better. The atmosphere of Ring 2, the creepy moves of samara... it's more frightening
Ringu 2 better
And the American remake
Samara gives more terror
I don’t understand why sadoko didn’t attack her 😐
Na minha opinião a versão japonesa tem mais drama é grito do que a versão americana.
I hate the 2005 version
The fact that the ghost didnt attacker her, just take a look at the child is MEANFUL for the lore, in the 2005 version look more a Final fight against a monster
The potray the ghost as a horrible evil monster defeated from the "heroine", instead of a tragic monster with a doomed and sad fate
And that "Im not your fucking mommy" in 'cool and strong american protagonist style' JUST RUIN THE VIBES, WHY CANT SHE JUST SHUT UP?!
Yh me to because ring 2 has more next gen background and preferable than ringu,and by the way sadaka did not attack her but comes to ring 2 what if Samara could have held her and grabbed her through the well😂it will be rip for her lol u Kno what I mean
It's the Ibaloy tribe!!! And the American folkloric avenging ghost Samara - a Muslim/American something
Funny how it’s the same director but the remake feels so ”hollywood” and that’s why I prefer the original.
In the remake Samaras movements seem way too over the top for me to enjoy. The original is just enough realistic to give me the creeps. And I like that we never actually saw her face but the reconstruction
The 1999 ringu doesn’t scare anyone. Samara Morgan creeps me out till this day
Ringu scares more ppl tho
@@4ngelicbeing really? Let me see the statistics. Link please?
Mannequin Sadako lmao
I’m I the only one who thinks the Japanese is inferior? Like it’s not creepy at all and the close up on her face made me bust out laughing.
Yah but if that monster was chasing you up a well you wouldn’t be laughing at all lol
@@lessismore8533the face was made out of clay tbh
Awesome
Boy
In
It
Remakes fucking suck.
Seriously, I just feel revulsion at the pathetic attempt Hollywood made at trying to 'out-do' the original.
I won’t lie I like Samaras crawl in the remake MUCH better. Sadako barely moved. But overall Japanese version of Ringu 2 is superior as US changed too many things
Lol they can’t outdo the original
I feel like the ring 2 didn't feel right. It was missing something. I didnt like it bc of the boring scenes and new areas. I feel soo bad for hideo for not making the film he wanted😕
I only like Ringu and Ringu 0. Ringu 2 and Rasen have thier problems but still better than the American remakes and recent sadako 3D films. Just like Ju on they should of quit while they were ahead
Sadako looks scarier
Tthe ring was good and it even has a flexible body to be samara
Bouldering Sadako
Like
It
The
Best
The american one always wins in my opinion
Samara Clere Falls From the well
The ring 2
Ringu 2 the Ring 2 sadako is fast then better than Samara morgan
I love the original Sadako but the American version is way more scarier. If y’all say the Japanese version is more scary than you just biased or plain dumb.
Please don't insult people for having a different opinion
2005
Ryan and I will be happy
The Ring Two is *waaaay* better, not only this final scene, the whole movie is better. Ringu 2 is not bad, but is more or less, it could be way better.
Ring 1and 2 (american version are so bad damn...)
Nope I like the Ring 2002 if it were bad it would’ve flopped. But Ring 2 flopped becuase Execs pushed Nakata around. Japanese is superior
I hate the end one liner fr.
Ringu 2 parece una parodia
rock climbing Sadako
Thumbs
Up
Ok
Ugh
A eu prefiro o 2005
the one Ringu 2.is.non
Rhino
Scary
Girl
Ugh
Ok
Killer har scared 👊🏻👊🏻🙀🙀🎃🎃
Ncolas
Sadako is better than Samara, because from the beginning she was kind and not selfish like Samara. You should remember that Ringu is scarier in that it is realistic, everyday, the colors are very bright, the feeling of reality is scary, making us feel like it will happen to us, while The Ring is sci-fi style. So, because it is not realistic, is less haunting. It should be noted that Sadako crawled slower than Samara, which is reasonable, her dress was very loose so it was likely heavy due to water, hindering her speed, which also shows how difficult it was for her to walk. climbing out of the well. As for Samara, she climbed so fast, so why couldn't she escape the well? I like Sadako better, she is clearly better than Samara in every aspect.
"from the beginning she was kind" are you sure? she was already using her psychic powers to kill while she was still alive.
Us version far better than Japanese. More realistic more creppy i like it better.
Japanese is better than US
@YTPooper XYZ are you implying that people who addicted to anime are trash?
@YTPooper XYZ you don’t have the rights to judge us
@YTPooper XYZ and furthermore that’s rude
@YTPooper XYZ bruh it’s like ur judging people eating popcorn mixed with pancakes or kpop dudes/girls loves kpop
I don't think these movies are somehow related. It was standalone sequel to standalone remake. American Ring is much more simpler than the Ringu lore