9 Ways Honest Gun Owners Accidentally Wind Up In Jail

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 ก.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 1.8K

  • @backfire
    @backfire  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +38

    Go to learbackfire.com/ or call 800-707-4575 to receive up to $15,000 in FREE bonus metals with a qualified purchase.

    • @Randy-v9x
      @Randy-v9x 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ironic, don't you smell? Honest Americans think about and consider these issues. However, modern American "law enforcers" are MORE consistent with WWII NAZIs than true Peace Officers AND "just follow odors.....oops orders" AND NEVER consider "lawful"......

    • @t.m9341
      @t.m9341 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I literally do not give a f about bump stocks. If anyone wants to be a Karen then they need to re evaluate the last 5 or so years and see the long game

    • @TacticalKangaroo1776
      @TacticalKangaroo1776 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      I wish you'd stop saying 16" or less.....IT'S Less than 16", there is a difference

    • @calvinwaligora8312
      @calvinwaligora8312 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      What torques me off about most lawyers who talk about guns, is that they constantly talk about Federal and State Laws, but they never talk about Constitutional Law, which is Supreme Law and any law that violates the United States Constitution is Null and Void.
      The Supreme Court said that any law that violates the United States Constitution is Null and Void.
      Lawyers need to grow a Spine and band together and take on these UnConstitutional Laws.
      What people don't understand is that Doctors are far more deadly than Guns ever will be.
      Doctors are responsible for over 8 Billion People's Deaths since the 1960s, in the United States alone.
      As a Journalist, I get these reports all the time. Wake up People, this Country is on the tipping point of not being the United States, but a totally different Country.

    • @Powertuber1000
      @Powertuber1000 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      They didn’t clarify, have a gun and marijuana, or have a gun while using marijuana.

  • @Phil-nl9ed
    @Phil-nl9ed 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2302

    So much time and energy is spent towards law-abiding citizens. Imagine if they use those resources to fight real crime instead.

    • @blackrifle6736
      @blackrifle6736 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +107

      *Remember it is always about the paycheck. A bust like this is easy pickings with little risk and ones arrest metrics look good come next performance review.*

    • @Jack-ur5or
      @Jack-ur5or 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +80

      Welcome to communism

    • @rottman88
      @rottman88 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +29

      ​@blackrifle6736 That's right. Go for the "low hanging fruit" and the establishment knows that the honest citizens will pay the attorney and the fines.. all that looks good to the public and helps fuel the "industry."
      Edit- typos corrected.

    • @blueovalfan23
      @blueovalfan23 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      they did at one point. they really need to learn the saying, "just because you, doesn't mean you should"

    • @letmedriveman5986
      @letmedriveman5986 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Problem reaction solution...order out of chaos

  • @kynaston1474
    @kynaston1474 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +970

    If you can legitimately accidentally go to PRISON the police AND legislators are THE problem.

    • @maxnomad8561
      @maxnomad8561 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +56

      if "ignorance of the law is no defence" then we all need to have a good education in law from the earliest age.

    • @michelerorabaugh8134
      @michelerorabaugh8134 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +34

      That is the intent. Make any laws that make you a criminal and make the gun unsafe.

    • @anti-popfpv4638
      @anti-popfpv4638 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      How else would they make money? Trust minor laws ruin lives. Lmk if you want to hear one person's experience, soon as I turned 18 I was a target.

    • @mikeswierczynski9334
      @mikeswierczynski9334 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@maxnomad8561there's ignorance of the law and then there's the code book that's eight feet thick and changes from state to state and county to county. Simple common sense gun laws yes but what law abiding citizens are expected to follow, which change on a whim, would be a full time job. Gun scholars can't even agree on the meaning of some of these laws, How is John Q Public supposed to?

    • @thisismyusername6717
      @thisismyusername6717 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      There is an army vet in my town who sold a gun to a guy who wasnt allowed one. The story is he went to buy it and the guy asked him if he is a felon to which he replied jokingly “ive been in 40 years” or something like that, i forget the quote. But long story short this 70 yr old man is going to die in prison and like 340 guns are being sold of his through family. I bought 2. A .17HMR and a .22 hornet. Both for $200 plus ammo and scope. Its sad. BUT. His legacy will live on bc im telling my kids and grandchildren this story when i hand these guns to them…..over my dead body ofc😅 i love rimfire. Wnd yes ik hornet is center but the recoil isnt like a centerfire either.

  • @guildig1
    @guildig1 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +910

    No firearm or firearm accessories should be illegal. The only thing that should be illegal is using the stuff to commit a crime.

    • @Landscapeofsolitude
      @Landscapeofsolitude 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +34

      Exactly! Yes! Somebody finally said it!

    • @anthonykeeton9103
      @anthonykeeton9103 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

      Agree if u can legally own a gun it should be any gun available

    • @kgkg6649
      @kgkg6649 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      Straight to the point:)

    • @staledorito6174
      @staledorito6174 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      I do think you should have to get a license for full auto weapons but agree

    • @guildig1
      @guildig1 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

      @staledorito6174 no you should not need a license for full automatic that is still a form of regulation. Before 1984 there were very little crime with full automatic gun. Just like today they want ARs banned and they are on the low side for crime.

  • @gnosphotos
    @gnosphotos 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +649

    “Shall not be infringed” has been infringed upon over 22k times

    • @camdenkulpa3938
      @camdenkulpa3938 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      More then that.. all of those people who spent time for nothing.

    • @gofastpulluphard7799
      @gofastpulluphard7799 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      read again @@mister_walter_sobchak

    • @Shiftdougler
      @Shiftdougler 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@mister_walter_sobchakthe right of people

    • @mikecarroll520
      @mikecarroll520 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      🎯 exactly

    • @JoeBz2011
      @JoeBz2011 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Shall not be infringed doesn't mean what you think. It doesn't mean - and therefore no limitations can be applied. It simply means you can own a firearm...which we can. It doesn't mean - therefore you can own a bazooka.

  • @johandewet2588
    @johandewet2588 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +479

    So many American gun laws are just plain stupid.

    • @clydemarshall8095
      @clydemarshall8095 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +43

      Literally all of them.

    • @Landscapeofsolitude
      @Landscapeofsolitude 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      @@clydemarshall8095
      Why would they criminalize possession of property and not go after the ones doing the crimes? Because they want to impose on anybody who owns anything they don’t like.
      It sounds like these stupid laws were made by some insolent old lawmakers with no common sense whatsoever.

    • @ulflyng
      @ulflyng 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      They are well thought through....they serve the purpose they were intented. Stopping populos from saying NO

    • @thegarage4570
      @thegarage4570 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

      Not stupid, unconstitutional! Abolish the ATF and repeal the NFA/GCA!

    • @TS-wq6qb
      @TS-wq6qb 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They aren't gun laws they are Constitutional infringements.
      Plain and simple.

  • @Sweatypractical
    @Sweatypractical 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +39

    The fact that there is even a video titled like this is a clear indicator as to how much out rights are being violated...

  • @Farnorthfarmer
    @Farnorthfarmer 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +688

    One item not mentioned…Hearing Protection Act….it should NOT be a federal crime to have a suppression device without a tax stamp. They are used specifically to protect hearing! Wish you would have mentioned that. I know Trump Jr. Is a huge proponent. Suppression devices do not kill unless used as a club. They should be readily available WITHOUT ANY permission needed to legal gun owners. Huge pain point. Keep doing what you do. I enjoy your vids and info sir 🤘💪

    • @lancekrystoff9619
      @lancekrystoff9619 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +74

      Actually, Trump has gone on record saying at one point not long ago that he “didn’t like suppressors. Can we just ban them?”
      Trump is NOT pro 2A or anything shooting related.

    • @austindiaz6767
      @austindiaz6767 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      ​@@lancekrystoff9619 can you read he said trump jr

    • @maguslascivious4980
      @maguslascivious4980 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      As long as the corrupt government can control you, gather information on you and take your money... they'll do it.

    • @lancekrystoff9619
      @lancekrystoff9619 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      @@austindiaz6767You are correct. I somehow missed that.
      That said, I would highly question whether or not his words are genuine given his father’s track record with the second amendment and tendency to run his mouth.

    • @theblishknovk
      @theblishknovk 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +59

      No guns or gun accessories should require tax, stamps, registration, or permission. Completely defeats the purpose of the 2nd.

  • @lorettacaputo6997
    @lorettacaputo6997 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +137

    I had an leo explain to me that when dealing with a suspect, they will find something that they can use to hold or be useful in prosecuting an individual. Laws seem to be in place not to prevent any crime but to trip citzens up in a web of legal problems.

    • @texastomsshavingtips6359
      @texastomsshavingtips6359 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      In My Humble Opinion,
      Unfortunately, that is probably closer to the mark than most people realize👍🤠🤣‼️
      I am NOT saying that I agree with the MARXIST-SOCIALIST REGIME, I'm just saying that your statement is closer to the truth than anything that the MARXIST-SOCIALIST REGIME says to the contrary In My Humble Opinion !!

    • @AlexHernandez-ee5hd
      @AlexHernandez-ee5hd 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@texastomsshavingtips6359
      You should probably start agreeing with the Socialist regime, because this problem is one of the big things we address. Late stage capitalism breeds this type of corruption for the cops, prosecutors, and judges to keep lining their pockets.

    • @brandonsmith2299
      @brandonsmith2299 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @lorettacaputo6997 Don’t forget. I learned this lesson first hand. COPS ARE NOT YOUR FRIENDS!! They ARE SNAKES!!!! But to add to your point. The cops job is to get you in jail and return to duty as fast as humanly possible.. it’s messed up. And I learned that and will never forget it.

    • @TonyGarrett-p1c
      @TonyGarrett-p1c 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I think the number one way they do so is to engage one in conversation. And one makes some sort of admission.

    • @_PatrickO
      @_PatrickO หลายเดือนก่อน

      Just be careful. Anyone who calls marijuana and gun laws a liberal trap is quite stupid. Liberals are federally legalizing with a prescription, and will be classifying marijuana the same as alcohol as soon as they control congress.
      Gun laws that trip people up are at the state level because feds don't go after people for this kind of thing so technicalities in federal law mean nothing unless you are doing something to get on the radar of the FBI which is not easy. It is the states that passed state statutes for things like marijuana so they can use any officer in the entire state against you. Red states are by far the worst about marijuana and overcharging.
      I am getting my prescription the second the process biden started finishes up and marijuana is reclassified to be legal with a prescription. My red state will be powerless which is great. Screw trump and his anti-american globalism.

  • @manny2ndamendment246
    @manny2ndamendment246 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +681

    Back the blue when they put you in jail for defending your life or your business?

    • @Mark-Dibble
      @Mark-Dibble 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +127

      Absolutely! I mean no! Or maybe? Please don’t bring logical questions to the comments section.

    • @jeffccr3620
      @jeffccr3620 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Uh you can't even defend someone else if they are in danger or being robbed
      Unless your protecting a elected official or their family member then it's OK 😅
      Laws are for you not them that's being proven daily

    • @Farnorthfarmer
      @Farnorthfarmer 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

      While I agree, it’s their job to enforce the ridiculous laws that are out there. They have to presume the worst with all.

    • @lancekrystoff9619
      @lancekrystoff9619 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +219

      @@Farnorthfarmer”Just doing your job” doesn’t cut it as an excuse for doing or partaking in something that is wrong.

    • @Farnorthfarmer
      @Farnorthfarmer 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      @@lancekrystoff9619 I DO agree with you, however they are held to an oath. If each upheld their own personal beliefs, ideals and feelings that were not based in the bylaws they agreed to uphold, I’d think the word “rogue” could be applied. I do support law enforcement 💯 and do my best to not give them anything they would question. I do have concerns with how I would be judged if I had to protect myself or fam. I’m just too naive.

  • @TheSakufighter
    @TheSakufighter 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +334

    I love how half these laws are so clearly tyrannical/unconstitutional yet nothing will ever be done about it. We are living on borrowed time.

    • @Gnolomweb
      @Gnolomweb 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      2a

    • @AlexHernandez-ee5hd
      @AlexHernandez-ee5hd 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      They aren't unconstitutional, but they are exceptionally controlling.

    • @stevenwagner9912
      @stevenwagner9912 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      All gun laws are unconstitutional. If you say otherwise you are a collaborator.

    • @betwandet41
      @betwandet41 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      @@AlexHernandez-ee5hdshall not be infringed. but i understand your point. I’d counter that with just because a judge says it’s not unconstitutional doesn’t mean that it isn’t.

    • @tactikiller
      @tactikiller 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      @@AlexHernandez-ee5hdanything that would in anyway undermine the ability to keep and bear arms is by definition unconstitutional.

  • @damondiehl5637
    @damondiehl5637 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +155

    That's funny, I thought the 2nd Amendment said "...the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." My bad.

    • @JamesSmullins
      @JamesSmullins 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      They seemed so happy that they could infringe on peoples rights for life. Maybe they should read the book three felonies a day before they start getting so excited, they aren't the law abiding citizens they think they are, they just haven't gotten caught yet.

    • @boombox05
      @boombox05 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      1) a well regulated militia 2) being necessary for the security of a free State. Missed some big qualifiers there. The 2A isn’t 1) whatever guns you want 2) for your security.

    • @JacobWilliams-vo6qy
      @JacobWilliams-vo6qy 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      ​@@boombox05learn to make a point.

    • @boombox05
      @boombox05 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@JacobWilliams-vo6qy learn to read

    • @damondiehl5637
      @damondiehl5637 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      @@boombox05 The hell it doesn't. John Adams was asked by a merchant whether he could put cannon on his ships to fight off pirates. Adams' reply was basically, "If you feel you need cannon on your ships, hell yes, put cannon on them."

  • @a-station-
    @a-station- 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +55

    America now goes after citizens before criminals. Anything to protect criminals...and the minimum for citizens, stance on justice is disgusting. All these anti-2nd politicians should just renounce their armed security. We damn sure shouldn't have to pay for it.

    • @stevenwagner9912
      @stevenwagner9912 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      A-effingmen.

    • @justHANKful
      @justHANKful หลายเดือนก่อน

      That's evidence that there are many, too many, in government who actually believe that others don't deserve rights.

    • @whydotheathensrage
      @whydotheathensrage หลายเดือนก่อน

      The pedo criminals are in government, most all are compromised and on film. This is who the cops protect and serve,,,not you.

  • @RazorBrain1
    @RazorBrain1 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +144

    In a country where we are supposed to be free and have the "right" to own and carry guns. You would think that you couldn't go to jail for mistakes or minor stuff. The fact that owning something you have a right to can cost you your freedom means you are not free. In a free society, if you made a mistake, you wouldn't be facing 10+ years in jail. The fact that anyone can say we are free is beyond delusional. It's like thanking your plantation Master for giving you a job. It just doesn't make sense. The Sons of Liberty would have been disgusted with us.

    • @tjboylan20
      @tjboylan20 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      We aren’t free we have the illusion of freedom

    • @Landscapeofsolitude
      @Landscapeofsolitude 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      You should add that 10+ years in prison is cruel and unusual punishment and should be considered treason by itself on whoever imposed that law on us.
      Also the fine is purposeful to cause people to become destitute and purposefully broke which still amounts to a cruel and unusual punishment.
      Also, sending people to prison for not complying with their demands is an easy way for the Judicial system to garner some very serious enemies.
      These are facts, it is literally based in our Constitution but they don’t apply Constitutional standards when they violate the law to impose on people.
      They purposely ignore the Constitutional laws they are supposed to reference against their own Court dockets and that is the problem I am trying to bring awareness of.

    • @warrenharrison9490
      @warrenharrison9490 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      We haven't operated under the constitution since the act of 1871.

    • @POSSUM3K3
      @POSSUM3K3 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Only free because they tell us so...

    • @MasterWitchDoctor
      @MasterWitchDoctor 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      theyre meant to be because theyre scared of us

  • @chexx5184
    @chexx5184 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +102

    Legal gun owners will always be under more scrutiny than a criminal, gotta love Weimerica

    • @chiwawa130
      @chiwawa130 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      All criminals used to be considered law abiding gun owners.

    • @maskedrebel9670
      @maskedrebel9670 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@chiwawa130 You don't have a leg to stand on with that.

  • @JohnLOdle
    @JohnLOdle 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +61

    I can tell you ,you don't have to do anything to be arrested because they can or will make up any law to arrest you ,if they wish.

    • @Bristecom
      @Bristecom 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      It has become the land of "Show me the man and I'll show you the crime."

    • @TonyGarrett-p1c
      @TonyGarrett-p1c 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I know a man who was charged with murder, after the disappearance of two girls who in fact died an accidental death of their own making.

    • @campandcook3118
      @campandcook3118 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Never Register anything, assemble your own Defense Tools from parts Kits, learn some milling on the way. Print your own PETG, Ceramic and CFK accesories.
      Dont "sell" ammo, "sit next to" your friend while they reload "by themself"

  • @BooDamnHoo
    @BooDamnHoo 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +31

    Besides universal constitutional carry, ending the NFA are two key changes to make. No more registration and tax stamp for SBRs or silencers.

    • @alexanderjustrom7850
      @alexanderjustrom7850 11 วันที่ผ่านมา

      It creates too much revenue for the government. It won’t happen until something serious changes things

  • @MrMrmetro
    @MrMrmetro 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +57

    For the record, there are now 27 States that legally allow permitless carry.

    • @frankfields2071
      @frankfields2071 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Awesome but commieforina is not one, where I'm stuck with age 78 and doctors in this democrap state

    • @tangoseal1
      @tangoseal1 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      @@frankfields2071 Forget about gun laws, politics, and making California not communist. At your age you should be in prayer, asking Jesus Christ to take you away to His Kingdom before its too late.

    • @kennykash6089
      @kennykash6089 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      29 now. (:

    • @vincentkingsdale8334
      @vincentkingsdale8334 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Doesnt matter. 2A trumps all state "laws",; 1A auditors do it all the time

  • @sbhjackson5931
    @sbhjackson5931 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    All you people flying Trump flags listen closely at 10:58. Thats right listen again to what your leader said.

    • @snowballzz4
      @snowballzz4 18 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

      Also Biden is known for falling down the stairs and off bikes and trump is known for surviving two assassination attempts

  • @victordalvarenga
    @victordalvarenga 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +77

    This video is very important. Every first gun owner should watch this video and be aware of one's state's law on firearms, even the small details. Thank you!

    • @theblishknovk
      @theblishknovk 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      Know them, then ignore them.

    • @dalepres1
      @dalepres1 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      This video is very important and every gun owner should watch, that's for certain. Every gun owner should watch this and understand what a Fudd is, someone who defends the right to keep their bolt-action hunting rifle but, otherwise, doesn't give a rat's-tail about the Constitution and the 2nd Amendment's protection of the right to keep and bear arms.

    • @MimicoBungalow
      @MimicoBungalow 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      how about enacting FEDERAL GUN LAWS - how many more innocent folks have to die because every yahoo is 'carrying a firearm' (second amendment says REGULATED MILITIA - not everyone each to his/her own - with guns aplenty...the gun lobby is twisting the constitution for their own sick purposes - grow up.

    • @justHANKful
      @justHANKful หลายเดือนก่อน

      This video gets barrel length wrong every time. Sixteen inches is an ecceptable rifle length. The change comes when the barrel is less than sixteen inches

  • @waterishdrake8693
    @waterishdrake8693 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Unfortunately I lost all my freaking guns in a boating accident!!! And with inflation can’t get anymore! So I don’t have to worry about any of these.

  • @theblishknovk
    @theblishknovk 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +255

    If people really took being an American seriously they would not comply with any gun control laws whatsoever. When you understand how and why this nation was founded, it is rediculous that so many just drop to their knee's. I hope more people wake up and stop complying. There are millions of us. Dont forget that.

    • @kellywalker8407
      @kellywalker8407 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      You nailed it.

    • @jeffhdpd782
      @jeffhdpd782 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      There has always been reasonable restrictions allowed. From the founding forward. Its not about bending knee and the inference is insulting,.

    • @MrJSchiedel
      @MrJSchiedel 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​, you're very wrong.

    • @tjboylan20
      @tjboylan20 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Not to out myself for anything but, I don’t know what gun laws are, I don’t follow them anyway

    • @tjboylan20
      @tjboylan20 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

      @@MrJSchiedelthe nation was founded by rebels fighting their government, they hated 3 things, Taxes, the King, and the government trying to take their guns

  • @AKAKiddo
    @AKAKiddo 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

    Another way to get in trouble worth mentioning is going onto the property of a federal post office while carrying. It's a felony.

    • @lonniebeal6032
      @lonniebeal6032 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@mister_walter_sobchakAnd we know that envelope has to pay for the assault...

  • @corneliuswowbagger
    @corneliuswowbagger 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    The bump stock debacle was Trump taking lousy advice from Wayne LaPierre assuming he represented gun owners! I have ceased contributing to NRA until Wayne steps down!

    • @kirkmooneyham
      @kirkmooneyham 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Correct. Trump is a businessman and entertainer, NOT a "gun guy". So yes, he took bad advice on something he had little knowledge of and made a huge mistake. However, it was a mistake, and not part of a larger PLAN of hard-core gun control like Joe Biden has pushed for.

  • @TYR_001
    @TYR_001 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

    the lack of due process for protective orders being able to strip your constitutional rights is absolutely outrageous. Also having suppressors are considered obligatory in many countries that are far more restrictive than the US as a courteous gesture to your neighbors as well as for your own hearing protection, it blows my mind that what is essentially a gun muffler is a restricted item.

    • @Newt94
      @Newt94 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Have you ever had a protective order against another person? It involves going to court and providing proof they are a danger to you. That's due process. I've had a stalker and was happy to hear their unstable a$5 couldn't legally aquire a gun.

    • @watcher13th
      @watcher13th 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      People don't have protective orders issued against them without reason. If someone acts irrationally or threatens others, they shouldn't be allowed to carry a gun.

    • @brainmind4070
      @brainmind4070 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Newt94 I think it's a tricky issue, but the problem is that in a lot of states, protective orders are issued pretty much automatically, especially if the claimant is a woman and the alleged aggressor is a man. The standard is "preponderance of evidence", not "beyond reasonable doubt", and they are always itchy with that "trigger finger" to put the order in place because from their perspective, the risks of getting it wrong with a false negative (order was needed but not issued) are much worse than getting it wrong with a false positive (order was issued but not needed).

  • @mhcaffey120
    @mhcaffey120 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +57

    We need to have firearm education in schools

    • @looopamith9456
      @looopamith9456 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@frugalfamilyliving4266any idea the rifle the kids are using

    • @heroinmom153
      @heroinmom153 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      We used to. Thank libs for taking that away.

    • @_Delta_P_
      @_Delta_P_ 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They change all the laws every 6 months. So it wouldn’t matter.

    • @mhcaffey120
      @mhcaffey120 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@_Delta_P_ I said gun education not gun law education. They are very different things

    • @mhcaffey120
      @mhcaffey120 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And gun laws are unconstitutional so..

  • @troy3456789
    @troy3456789 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    Steve Dettelbach, head of the BATF, has never personally owned and has never been issued a firearm. He considers himself an expert on firearms. He is anything but an expert based upon his statements. His actual expertise: Civil rights lawyer.

    • @jemjones5675
      @jemjones5675 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      To be fair....I'm sure where he works has gun ranges and dept owned guns. Don't have to have one in your home to be trained and familiar.

  • @Funk8_4
    @Funk8_4 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +62

    Guess who isnt worried about these "laws"?

    • @daveberry3853
      @daveberry3853 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Me😂

    • @heroinmom153
      @heroinmom153 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Blapeepo

    • @rustysausage69
      @rustysausage69 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      criminals

    • @Daily5280
      @Daily5280 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@heroinmom153 and why wouldn’t we be worried about these laws..

    • @zGoodMan187z
      @zGoodMan187z 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The thugs n blue

  • @pilotlang1
    @pilotlang1 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Why do we need all of these rules???????????????? What part of "...shall not be infringed..." confuses our government???

  • @bradisaacson4656
    @bradisaacson4656 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

    An AR Pistol is a barrel length less than 16 inches not "16 inches or less", which is what you said.

    • @kennykash6089
      @kennykash6089 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yeah, but you won't find many (if any) at 16" exactly. They're always made a fraction over for the obvious reason.

    • @1acudoc
      @1acudoc 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@kennykash6089 I noticed a few times that 16”or less was stated as illegal. I think the point is that 16” is legal. Less than 16” is illegal.

    • @joseluisureno444
      @joseluisureno444 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@kennykash6089 the point is that 16” barrels are legal and less than 16” are illegal, this guy keep saying that 16” or less are illegal and that’s
      Incorrect and misleading

  • @K_a_Z010
    @K_a_Z010 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Compliance is Participation. These laws are unjust and ridiculous, meaning if you comply, you’re unjust and ridiculous yourself.
    -Me, Nov 2023

    • @malcolmgraves2428
      @malcolmgraves2428 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Quoting yourself is the most cringe shit Ive ever seen

  • @johnneill5960
    @johnneill5960 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    I’d rather be judged by 12 than carried by 6. This philosophy has saved my ass more than once . Always look to deescalate , especially when carrying a gun , this has also saved me . Lastly don’t start any won’t be any , also has saved me . If you think you’re a tough guy cause you carry a gun maybe you shouldn’t.

  • @jamesa55
    @jamesa55 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Do not invest in gold.Anyone with half of a brain in investing knows this is the worst time you could ever invest in gold. You buy when the prices are down, not sky high. This is the time to sell gold. If you buy it, you will be losing money. Also I wouldn't trust anyone trying to sell it to you like this guy.

  • @user-rf3cn2ou3x
    @user-rf3cn2ou3x 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +40

    As long as you don't intend to commit crimes with a gun it should be perfectly legal to carry it. Just saying that the gun in ,and of itself shouldn't be a crime, committing a crime with a gun should be the illegal part.

    • @OGbqze
      @OGbqze 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What if they make it illegal to own or obtain or carry said gun? Now your argument is invalid because simply owning the gun is committing a crime. You're bound to either become an unarmed boot licking law abiding citizen, or you're going to become a criminal by simply owning a firearm. Pick your poison.

    • @afroghair6793
      @afroghair6793 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      LOL

    • @Landscapeofsolitude
      @Landscapeofsolitude 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The problem is they use
      pre-crime laws involving our gun rights out of concern for others to impose on us.
      Let me give you some examples:
      -If you end up on probation for something minor you can’t own anything they say you can’t and they expect you to “transfer” or “sell” said property.
      -Any law they can impose on us even if we have absolutely no malicious intent whatsoever to misuse our property(guns), it’s all a control tactic is all it is based on mob rule by compliance squads that will kill you if you don’t comply.
      That is how I view much of these problems.
      They expect you to give up your right to self-defense if they demand you do even if your life could be at stake if you gave up your guns and they don’t care if you die because of them.
      That’s the problem.

  • @trevspeaks3
    @trevspeaks3 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    But yall love Trump and hate Obama. Lol. I'm so shocked that a gun channel made this vid in this manner. Trump is as "liberal" as they come when it comes to the 2A.

  • @DarcyS369
    @DarcyS369 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    Living in Canada should be on there

    • @backfire
      @backfire  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Haha. So true.

  • @DrewC-ez1fj
    @DrewC-ez1fj 29 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    @ 5:48 we get the “I support the 2nd amendment but…” bologna.

  • @benlastname6667
    @benlastname6667 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Its not 16 inches or shorter. Its under 16 inches. You should know this..

    • @jimyeats
      @jimyeats 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      He had the correct information on the screen. Its a raw video, misspeaks are going to happen occasionally. Stop being that person.

    • @benlastname6667
      @benlastname6667 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @jimyeats you're under the assumption I watched the screen while listening. So your idea of occasionally happens to be repeatedly in one video...yeah, don't tell me what I should and shouldn't do.

    • @jimyeats
      @jimyeats 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@benlastname6667 Yes, I am, because its a video, and because you came and felt the need to type a comment out.

    • @benlastname6667
      @benlastname6667 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jimyeats you also felt the need to type yours. You live in a glass house. Kick rocks.

    • @jimyeats
      @jimyeats 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@benlastname6667 My point noting your comment is that you would had to have been looking at your screen, thus seeing the fact that they are putting information and corrections on the screen.

  • @dustinpribble1546
    @dustinpribble1546 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Less thab 16in.... notb16in or less, tes theres a differen.16in is fine, 15.9in is where problems start
    The protective order.... turns u into a prohibited person, not just can't carry but u cant own.
    Lots of little yet important mistakes in this video

    • @backfire
      @backfire  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Yeah, I said that a few times in the video incorrectly. I put it in text to correct it, but felt dumb that I kept saying that.

  • @adamfunk4519
    @adamfunk4519 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Ignorance is no excuse they say,but when the laws are changed like a pair of panties there will be accidental violations..by mostly law abiding citizens that doesn't even have a background to check.without reasonable doubt supposed to mean something

  • @jackbarnes5589
    @jackbarnes5589 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Explain to me how an alcoholic can have a 50 cal. but a person who is perscribed medical cannabis can't even have a .22lr pistol. Stoners have rights too. Hell, Oxycodone blows marijuana out of the water and that is fine to have and own guns.

    • @Jonathan-iq7lc
      @Jonathan-iq7lc 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I'm anti marijuana. But a stoner should 100% be able to own any gun they'd like.

    • @andyleotell
      @andyleotell 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Freedom! Should not matter what one chooses to put in their body…. Shall not be infringed!

    • @thefifthaceassociation
      @thefifthaceassociation 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Yeah, when push comes to shove, I'm just gonna say, "The form said, 'are you an illegal user of marijuana'"
      Nope, I bought by bud legally, from a dispensary, taxed and everything.
      I'll let the cards fall where they do. It's not like they don't have a database for both, if they really cared about people not having both, they would just prohibit you with red flags by cross referencing the two. But they don't want that, they want to be able to disarm you, period, but they can't do that without a reason, so they have it the way it is now. You can buy both, legally, but can't have both legally. Stupid.
      edit: this will effectively turn you into a felon and thus unable to have a firearm, ever. Thats their plan. They can't call it an honest score if there is no net, that's why they leave the net.

  • @lanceu9134
    @lanceu9134 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    Too much back the blue simping

  • @sumoneelse6881
    @sumoneelse6881 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Make sure the statement about AR-15 pistols is "LESS THAN 16 inches", not or less.

  • @NotKamalasBich
    @NotKamalasBich หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    LESS THAN sixteen inches, NOT sixteen inches or less. Sixteen inches or more is a rifle.
    What changed on the Bump stock? Mandalay Bay.

  • @GuapCologist.
    @GuapCologist. 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    Fine line between a defensive display and brandish. Saved me once, felt dumb doing it, still placing my gun on my seat stopped a bad situation.

    • @marianmoses9604
      @marianmoses9604 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I agree. What is maddening is that in any fact situation where a “fine line” exists between a lawful / unlawful action, you can pretty much depend on some Democrat, Soros bought-and-paid-for, eager beaver prosecutor to opt to go for a full bore prosecution. They will ALWAYS go with the “interpretation” that is least advantageous for the hapless citizen. Also, their obedient lap dogs in the MSM will always broadcast the Leftist narrative (lie) to the public to paint you in the worst light possible and contaminate any potential jury pool of your “peers.”

  • @jamesjohnson7981
    @jamesjohnson7981 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    give non violent convictions their 2nd back after their sentence has been served.

    • @eugenedeckard8714
      @eugenedeckard8714 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      If they don't regain their rights, then how is their debt paid? How can they be considered free from discrimination? How can they ever feel fully accepted as a free American citizen? Why should they have any less of a right to protect themselves or their family? Why shouldn't they have a voice in the voting process?

  • @mweeks2000
    @mweeks2000 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    All these laws do is make honest people criminals. How did this happen?

  • @1776AxlePowerDM
    @1776AxlePowerDM 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Imagine saying you're a pro 2A advocate, then explain how you submitted to the a f t and turned in your bumpstock. Yes, my lord, I shall bend my knee to your tyranny.

  • @THall-vi8cp
    @THall-vi8cp 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    You might want to clarify exactly who classifies as a prohibited person. Your description was simply someone who cannot buy a gun from an FFL, but it's a little more nuanced. For example, in some states 18- 20-year-olds cannot purchase a handgun from an FFL but they can via private party transaction. They aren't prohibited persons.

    • @POSSUM3K3
      @POSSUM3K3 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The 18-20yr olds not able to purchase handguns just got shutdown by a judge ruling it unconstitutional. Now the ATF will appeal of course as always but they arent going to win due to Bruen. Now NICS will needs to be changed to allow the purchase, but currently they can now legally purchase handguns.

  • @trustyoureyes96
    @trustyoureyes96 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    This is total crap...this system is totally corrupt

  • @Relics
    @Relics 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Being a bootlicker isn't being "honest".
    Don't follow their tyrannical laws they will come after you eventually. Don't give them an inch.

    • @RepentNBelieveNJesus
      @RepentNBelieveNJesus 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      1 Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God.
      2 Whosoever therefore resisteth the power, resisteth the ordinance of God: and they that resist shall receive to themselves damnation.
      3 For rulers are not a terror to good works, but to the evil. Wilt thou then not be afraid of the power? do that which is good, and thou shalt have praise of the same:
      4 For he is the minister of God to thee for good. But if thou do that which is evil, be afraid; for he beareth not the sword in vain: for he is the minister of God, a revenger to execute wrath upon him that doeth evil.
      5 Wherefore ye must needs be subject, not only for wrath, but also for conscience sake.
      6 For for this cause pay ye tribute also: for they are God's ministers, attending continually upon this very thing.
      7 Render therefore to all their dues: tribute to whom tribute is due; custom to whom custom; fear to whom fear; honour to whom honour
      Romans 13:1-7 KJV
      Seek Jesus with everything you have while you can. Love Him more than guns.

  • @jessvagnar4957
    @jessvagnar4957 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    FYI Bump Stocks are legal as of June 2024.

  • @TuffEnuffIII
    @TuffEnuffIII 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    Who knew that "shall not be infringed" could be so difficult for government to understand?

    • @JamesSmullins
      @JamesSmullins 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And from watching this video gun owners as well. So long as the attitude exists that you can deny rights to a person forever because you think they're a bad person based on something they may or may not have done in their past there will always be opportunity for government to find new ways to make prohibited persons. That's what the gca was for, it was gun control and a easy way was create felons then disarm them it ranges from 10-24% of state populations with Florida and Texas being the highest as prohibited persons. With numbers that high if these people were dangerous we'd be war zones.
      At least Texas allows non violent felons to have firearms for self defense on their property five years after all time and probation is done. Feds can still charge them but state can't.

  • @defomatt2684
    @defomatt2684 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +29

    I have always said the GUN FREE zones are the most dangerous place to be. Law abiding citizens, will comply, but what about the criminal? You stand no chance at those places.

    • @JacobWilliams-vo6qy
      @JacobWilliams-vo6qy 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      I carry into the dmv, I "illegally" concealed for years in cali. I don't abide by unconstitutional laws😊.

    • @rabidrabbit6863
      @rabidrabbit6863 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Check local laws to a lot of times the sign carries no legal ramifications. Just means you can’t open carry. In my state if you’re caught concealed carrying in a “gun free zone” the most that can be done is you are asked to leave the private property.

    • @TS-wq6qb
      @TS-wq6qb 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Being one of these so called law abiding citizens would mean you follow only the supreme law of the land right. I know how to read and my reading comprehension has been scaled very high on tests, so carry what you want, when you want, how you want. Enough said

  • @LordRahl11
    @LordRahl11 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    You keep saying 16" or shorter for an SBR. It's only on rifles with barrels shorter than 16". You can have a barrel that is 16" and a stock on it and you will only have a rifle, not a Short Barreled Rifle. And a vertical grip also. But just anything with a barrel shorter than 16" cannot have a stock or a vertical grip without an SBR tax stamp.

    • @dalepres1
      @dalepres1 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They're Fudds. Obey beyond the law. Surrender more rights than otherwise forced. Next the might be asking to just turn in those nasty fully semi-automatic weapons.

    • @Landscapeofsolitude
      @Landscapeofsolitude 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I am pretty sure that illegal/Unconstitutional law was struck down in Court.

    • @brainmind4070
      @brainmind4070 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If you've got a barrel that's exactly 16 inches, good chances are you've got a barrel that's less than 16 inches.

    • @JaredaSohn
      @JaredaSohn หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@brainmind4070umm, no. The most popular barrel length for the most popular rifle (AR-15) is 16".

    • @brainmind4070
      @brainmind4070 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@JaredaSohn And have you measured those "16 inch" barrels? How long are they to the thousandths place? I don't know how the law is written, but if it doesn't specify a tolerance and temperature under which the measurement is to be taken, you're talking about non-compliance in certain conditions.

  • @harryTal-gp3sj
    @harryTal-gp3sj 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    It’s not a accident they frame them on purpose

  • @semlohde1
    @semlohde1 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    A St Jude Dr was walking with his 2 year old daughter and wife last week in Memphis. A black man got out, woman was driving - they stopped and robbed the unarmed couple. The dr gave the black man his wallet but that wasn't enough. He aimed at the wife. The young dr tried to protect, save his wife and daughter. The black man killed the doctor. With respect to your video- the doctor should have been armed and successful in killing the robber. Your laws protect the savage. Memphis is one of the top murdering cities in the United States. Tell his wife and daughter - I am angry over these protect the murderer and don't defend your white self. A Memphis senator has asked the governor for the Memphis over run shootings and break ins and car thefts- as they may arrest them, but then release them.

  • @fogatron503
    @fogatron503 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    16 inch is totally legal. Below 16 is an SBR. Please make correction on your video. You probably freaked some people out…

    • @brainmind4070
      @brainmind4070 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It's basically the same thing. You don't want a 16.0000 inch barrel because if the temperature changes you now have a 15.9998 inch barrel.

  • @jeffccr3620
    @jeffccr3620 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    The way i view it is if the military has it you can have it god says so 😅

  • @r.f.pennington746
    @r.f.pennington746 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    Great vid as usual. As gun carriers--and I hope all day, every day, 24/7--we've got to be a bit smarter than the average bear. Don't go out drinking even one drink while armed. Get a water. Drink at home and get as blitzed as you want. Don't mix rec pot with carrying. Don't get into a sit where you get a protective order thrown on you: if it's falling apart, let the other person go their way. Don't go to seedy parts of town (what's there, anyway!?!). Don't speed on the highway. Don't run stop signs. Don't fall prey to road rage--Jeepers, let the other guy get ahead and be the first one at the next red light! Don't show a firearm to try to de-escalate. Keep 'em away from kiddos. Be responsible and be an adult. I've used these rules every day since 1979 and it has worked for me so far. The gun, like the fire extinguisher, is a tool. We don't pull out our fire extinguishers willy-nilly just to show them off.

    • @FuckGoogle502
      @FuckGoogle502 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Clearly, you didn't grow up with a firefighter.

    • @LockGrinder
      @LockGrinder 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      I would add a few things: don't buy anything that might attract thieves and home invaders. For the same reason, keep you property looking dilapidated (better yet, don't own property, rent a small apartment instead). Ride a bus. Don't wear new or nice clothes. Never visit a restaurant, just buy groceries, lest somebody thinks you have extra money to steal. Don't get a well-paying job, because that money will attract robbers/thieves. Don't date women, they are the ones with protective orders. Always run away from conflicts, because standing up for yourself leads to "escalation". Yep, just be a compliant little mouse/pushover/doormat, and let everyone else run your life. 😂😂
      One exception: you can absolutely, positively get angry over a TH-cam comment. It's quite safe. Just don't express it as a threatening reply, or I might report you and you might get in trouble.
      Do you see what I'm getting at, wise one? While there is some wisdom in your words, some things you simply can't avoid or evade in this life. Your philosophy is that of complete compliance with the government. Well, might as well give up that gun, you'll never use it even if you have to, and it's not what the Second Amendment was for.

    • @charlesdonahue3667
      @charlesdonahue3667 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@LockGrinder Now you're just being silly. The advice he gave is beneficial to most and will help keep people out of trouble. However this is social media and even a post expressing how beautiful and sunny the day is, will be met by someone with some silly negative commentary about it.

    • @LockGrinder
      @LockGrinder 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@charlesdonahue3667 I'm not being silly. I'm being sarcastic. I'm highlighting what his way of thinking amounts to. "A firearm is a government-licensed toy that I'm lucky to hold in my hand". Instead of, you know, CONSTITUTIONAL right. And it's always hard to deal with partial-truth comments. But I think I said "there is some wisdom in your words", a point that you missed, obviously. I'm only really against "don't get into a sit where you get a protective order" and "don't show firearm to de-escalate". The first one is dumb and completely unconstitutional, a random angry chick should be able to take away your rights, and the second one is just plain dumb. In the first one, "don't get into a sit" advice tells you not get into something you have no control over getting into. With the other one, What am I going to wait until he actually attacks me so that I'm forced to kill him in self-defense? And then have to go through the legal and financial nightmare of proving my innocence? Instead of simply showing the gun as a warning and getting him to back off?

    • @charlesdonahue3667
      @charlesdonahue3667 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@LockGrinder Anyone reading your commentary understood it was sarcasm, they also understood it was silly. Someone posted a video offering practical advice on how to avoid legal trouble relative to EDC and you viewed it as an opportunity to joke. The First Amendment protects your right to do so. Your decision to hyperbolize the video's message to make a rant about constitutionality reveals your temperament. It's up to readers to decide if they choose to be influenced by such commentary in matters concerning their legal rights and safety.

  • @Ls3Elky69
    @Ls3Elky69 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    My thing with the stock/pistol grip is like why would you not want people owning those to potentially install an attachment to have more accurate shots?😂 like wouldn’t you want people to be more accurate and Arguably safer shooters? Crazy concept right

  • @dragonf1092
    @dragonf1092 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Background checks are unconstitutional therefore illegal in violation of the supremacy clause, article 4 section 2 paragraph 1, second amendment,10th amendment,14th amendment section 1.

  • @badaceblackbelt
    @badaceblackbelt หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Prohibited persons should not be on the streets. If they are too dangerous to sell a gun to, they are too dangerous to be out of prison.

  • @Taiylim
    @Taiylim หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This is why government shouldn't have so much control. The entire sections regarding law just had me shaking my head. How can old-kroons issue these laws that make no sense yet hide behind fully armed military-like security.

  • @Ruby_Sterling
    @Ruby_Sterling 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Freedom is a myth.

  • @thomaskingsbury6560
    @thomaskingsbury6560 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    So after watching this video it occurs to me a lot of folks in Utah probably have insurance based self defense programs. If you defend yourself and in the process decide to plea out your insurance based protection ends. Check it out “he ain’t lyin” So a shameless plug checkout AOR or Attorneys for Freedom because if you have any of the issues talked about here they WILL take the case and defend you. They are criminal defense attorneys and offer self defense coverage for you and your family. “Not a paid affiliate or spokes person for Attorneys on Retainer” I’m not you just don’t want to find out you are not covered when you thought you were.

  • @j.Mayer3148
    @j.Mayer3148 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    9 ways our own government uses to incriminate otherwise law abiding citizens, who’ve conveniently forgotten the definition of infringed.

  • @Jayreisofficial
    @Jayreisofficial หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thugs have autos , switches , illegal rounds..
    But they wanna regulate police,security, and tell people what they can't and can do lmao

  • @ThoseOneGuysInc
    @ThoseOneGuysInc 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    SBR rule is especially important if you live in a place like Kansas City which has the Missouri/Kansas border splitting it down the middle. Have to be careful where you drive and shoot.

    • @quintonhays371
      @quintonhays371 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      I live here and when I got my suppressor which doesn't follow the same rules as sbrs. They told me of a guy who broke up with his gf and he went across state lines with both and she called the ATF. He's a felon and serving like 10 years bc he didn't tell them of the sbr.

    • @lukelee8934
      @lukelee8934 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      So the atf are making good people into felons while doing nothing to stop real criminal threats

    • @Landscapeofsolitude
      @Landscapeofsolitude 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@quintonhays371
      That’s why it’s important to get petitions and flyers of said petitions to end these illegal infringements of our Rights.
      What they are doing to our gun rights is illegal. The Constitution forbids these Unconstitutional rules from being enforced, the Constitution is for the Courts to look at to make sure they are not violating any Constitutional laws or the Bill of Rights.
      They are purposely avoiding using Constitutional references in Court because these Federal Judges know they will lose.
      I say this because Constitution.US explains that the Constitution is there to tell them what they are allowed to do and what is not allowed.

    • @Dj1DurBreD
      @Dj1DurBreD 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      No reason to ever go into KCK 😂

  • @jamessanborn2094
    @jamessanborn2094 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    That was not trump! Dont be dumb and any law that is against the constitution is not only your right to ignore it is your duty! So any law regarding guns is a violation of the US constitution and the people should charge the traders. That is what trump says! I stand with the people!

  • @Heikin-Ashi-Larry
    @Heikin-Ashi-Larry 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Ar15 pistol is less than 16 inches not 16 inches and less. 16 inch is gtg

    • @dalepres1
      @dalepres1 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Barrel length does not define a pistol. If you have an upper under 16 inches in length that is installed or stored with a pistol lower then it's a pistol. You can have a pistol with an 18 inch barrel if you choose. But a rifle (shoulder stocked) lower with a barrel under 16 inches is an SBR.

  • @kerplunk38880
    @kerplunk38880 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I'd watch your videos if you'd index them. I can't spend 20 minutes with all of the small talk.

  • @jcb86-a
    @jcb86-a 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    I’m so tired of hearing about keeping guns out of the hands of “prohibited people“. If a citizen of the United States is not incarcerated or institutionalized, they have the right to have a firearm. If they are too dangerous, why are they on the streets?
    This justification is the basis for every single infringement on our 2A rights. I’m sorry, but a person intent on evil will find a way to get a firearm or any other weapon they want. My rights are not contingent on the actions of criminals.

    • @RoryMartel
      @RoryMartel 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      i was thinking this same thing. if someone is not to be trusted then why are they allowed to walk around free? convict and imprison the worst and leave the rest to enjoy freedom. its clear they just want control and to extract money and make everyone weaker.

  • @micwell2247
    @micwell2247 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    All that was heard here was how the gov wants you the law abiding firearm owner jailed. While nothing happens to the criminal ...it's only and always about taking constitutional rights away

  • @booch9109
    @booch9109 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I identify as a black gang member so they drop the gun charges first.

  • @haydendenard2693
    @haydendenard2693 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    As a friend of mine once said nobody should see that thing before they hear it sing

  • @RyanN4673
    @RyanN4673 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Aww yeah poor California fs but nobody ever talks about how bad it is in Hawaii lmaooo

  • @5N3K93
    @5N3K93 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Not a single one of these gun laws saved any lives.

    • @DrunkyDaClown
      @DrunkyDaClown 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Except for that one time

  • @ChickenPermissionOG
    @ChickenPermissionOG 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    how is crossing state lines illegal it is America and the constitution supersedes fed and state law.

  • @stellargtl5245
    @stellargtl5245 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    We need to collectively not follow unconstitutional laws. These two seem like part of the problem.

  • @BoneheadGuitars
    @BoneheadGuitars 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    SBR does not mean "16" or less" It's LESS THAN 16"

    • @brainmind4070
      @brainmind4070 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Pretty semantic. It's effectively the same thing. 16.0000" on a warm summer day is 15.9998" in January.

  • @thebruceleefan
    @thebruceleefan 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    1 voting democrat
    2 living in a communist democrat state
    3 you get the point

  • @tc6818
    @tc6818 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    6:23 Are you prohibited from selling a long gun to someone from out of state? Or is that only restriction only for handguns and SBRs?

    • @LeverPhile
      @LeverPhile 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Any firearm must be purchased in your state of residence per Federal Law.

    • @tc6818
      @tc6818 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@LeverPhile Sorry, your statement is only correct if the transaction involves a handgun. However the question was specifically about long guns. Rifles and shotguns may be purchased by persons who are residents of other states so long as the sale complies with applicable laws in the purchaser's state of residence.

  • @damonharrington2948
    @damonharrington2948 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    AR with a barrel 16” or less is an SBR now? 🤔 16” is legal along with any pin & welded muzzle device creating a 16” overall barrel length (13.7-14.5 depending on muzzle device length)!

  • @brandonmcmanis5528
    @brandonmcmanis5528 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    In Colorado brandishing is called felony menacing with a deadly wepon. They tried and faild to charge me with that one time my neighbor and I got into an agument and i had my gun on me. Didn't point it at him or pulled it out just had it on me. Had court for 6 months lost my gun for 8 months 4 days in jail ( i couldn't afford bail ) yeah fun times.

    • @kellywalker8407
      @kellywalker8407 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Lived all my life in the Colorado high country. Those bastard Front Range liberals.........
      Sad, but Wyoming is looking pretty good too me.

    • @Landscapeofsolitude
      @Landscapeofsolitude 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It sounds like an idiot presiding over you couldn’t charge you and wanted to see you in jail when he couldn’t charge you.
      You should keep date and times of when you are incarcerated for anything like that ever again so you can report that b*h boy Judge to the court board authority.
      If something similar ever happens again and the Court board authority does nothing about it, you should be able to tell if they are corrupt or not.

    • @brandonmcmanis5528
      @brandonmcmanis5528 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@kellywalker8407 What's messed up is I live on the western slope in a supposed "2a sanctuary county" but because of the Brady handgun act and all the lefties from California, they jump at the opportunity to take your guns away. Colorado used to be a shining example of 2a rights and freedoms.

    • @warrenharrison9490
      @warrenharrison9490 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You get flagged when making new purchases?

    • @POSSUM3K3
      @POSSUM3K3 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@kellywalker8407well I suggest northern WY. Here in SW WY it's just wind, snow, rock and sagebrush. Good paying jobs here without a state tax but it's not that pretty to look at compared to up in the northern part of the state lol.

  • @tmutant
    @tmutant 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    To be fair to Trump, he asked the NRA for advice on bumpstocks, and the NRA threw bumpstock owners under the bus.

    • @Jack-ur5or
      @Jack-ur5or 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I gave up on the nra a long time ago

  • @clydemarshall8095
    @clydemarshall8095 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +31

    I would oppose private background checks because them being optional is only one step away from them being mandatory.

    • @hunclex7495
      @hunclex7495 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Absolutely true. Why don't people understand that, that is the way they get to sneak in more restriction.

  • @scottricci7154
    @scottricci7154 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Surely your talking about in public not on said persons own property

  • @mikeoxmaul5465
    @mikeoxmaul5465 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Abolish the AFT

  • @slopsec2358
    @slopsec2358 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It is not 16" or shorter!
    It is 'any barrel shorter than 16".

  • @Vooz_WoW
    @Vooz_WoW 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    You should mention that only vertical foregrips are illegal on AR pistols. Angled foregrips will not make you a felon if you put one on an AR pistol.
    This is for owners using a brace who have not paid a tax stamp for a SBR.

    • @waldgeist3234
      @waldgeist3234 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Fun fact: We have one of the most restrictive weapon laws in the world here in Germany. However, foregrips on ARs are legal for everyone and if you have a hunting license, you can go to the store and buy as many suppressors as you want without any issue. 😅

  • @davidgracie6772
    @davidgracie6772 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    There’s also 14.5 pin and welds for barrels as well

  • @Minuteman75
    @Minuteman75 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    This is why you need great lawyers who like suing the establishment.

  • @samaelmartinus3273
    @samaelmartinus3273 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Do a video of TH-camrs who are now in prison!!🎉

  • @bobborlog1677
    @bobborlog1677 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

    Imagine complying with this anti American government.

    • @Landscapeofsolitude
      @Landscapeofsolitude 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      The problem is there are so many of them who really don’t understand that they are persecuting their own friends, family and partners with these illegal and Unconstitutional laws. These are my beliefs.
      The other fact is these are factions of people using force against individual people who don’t comply even if they have done nothing criminal with their own property. That is where the problem lies.

  • @OnlinecarshowNet1
    @OnlinecarshowNet1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The whole marijuana thing is a mess. Why marijuana and not fentenal , cocaine or heroin. 😂 thats always shocked me. Not to mention return offenders for DWI

    • @Judah_Mafia_074
      @Judah_Mafia_074 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Because weed makes you feel good like a prophet they don’t want you to feel better than them

  • @michaeltaylor7996
    @michaeltaylor7996 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    I had a stalker that was threatening me with violence and setting ambush in parking lots of stores i patron. After two police reports, the third incident happened right in front of my front door of my unit, and the guy came running out of his front door and was not visible to me because he was running behind my truck to get at me. I drew my 9 mm full-size MMP one in the chamber no safety out of a Blackhawk Serpa holster And pointed it at him and he retreated. He called the police and claimed that I drew my firearm and pointed it at him as he was standing in his doorway. So after I was cuffed up and ready to go to jail, I showed the arresting officers the video And I told them that they would’ve mag dumped on this guy and they agreed 100%. They also agreed that I showed self restraint by not squeezing the trigger. USCCA that I was a member of for several years did not answer my collect phone calls, and when they saw the video they did not take my case. The DA dropped the case but I still had to pay for an attorney out-of-pocket. Do not waste your money on USCCA open your own bank account for savings That you can use when you need a real attorney and not these fake fools from USCCA. This happened in Salt Lake City Utah 33rd south and State Street.

    • @RoryMartel
      @RoryMartel 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      dont talk to police. why would you answer the door and talk to police about all this shit? they don't care about you. they want arrests.

    • @michaeltaylor7996
      @michaeltaylor7996 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@RoryMartel who answered the door? Is this directed at me? I never answered a door.

    • @michaeltaylor7996
      @michaeltaylor7996 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@RoryMartel I was in my truck

    • @RoryMartel
      @RoryMartel 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@michaeltaylor7996 next itme don't explain anything to police. they aren't a jury

    • @michaeltaylor7996
      @michaeltaylor7996 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@RoryMartel video that spoke all the words I needed. DA never even took the case to court and USCCA didn’t answer any phone calls so I canceled them.. good luck on your vote for Kamala

  • @brontoab1
    @brontoab1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I bet they wish they hadn't destroyed those bumpstocks now!!!!

  • @JD-qh3sd
    @JD-qh3sd 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The discussion about protective orders failed to distinguish between ex parte orders (prior to any contested hearing) and protective orders entered AFTER a contested hearing in which due process is observed. The ex parte orders do not have the same legal effect on the right to possess a gun as the order that is entered by the court only after an adversarial hearing in which both parties are heard. Not all protective orders actually fit into the definition of the type of protective order that triggers the federal prohibition on firearm possession.

  • @GamingInProgress
    @GamingInProgress 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    “#3 we don’t want EVERYBODY to have guns”
    Speak for yourself