I honestly am just sick of battle pass and shops having weird skins and very overpriced skins on an already 70$ game I really hope they can find a way to make it better
Im sorry, but this is the new wave, weather you like it or not you have to accept it, and look at the good side of it: new maps and new weapons are free
@@claudio6572Unless you are FLAT OUT BROKE you're getting screwed. There is a cost for "free" and that cost is the loss of maps, weapons, skins, etc. and all done at a HIGH quality that we used to get. The math is very simple. Look at the count and delivery pace of new maps, game modes, and vehicles in the Battlefield 2, 3, and 4 expansion packs. Then look at the same stats for Battlefield 2042's "free" bullshit. It's less than a quarter the count of those.
@@claudio6572 show me the lie. How many new maps did 2042 put out? How fast was that? Battlefield 3 had 5 expansions with 20 new maps (some of the best the franchise has ever seen), numerous new gameplay modes, a bunch of new vehicles and weapons, and skins. And the expansions were on sale constantly so you could pick them up cheap.
The main thing that modern shooters lack is grit and seriousness. Yes we are all playing these games for fun but when you have ridiculously cheesy, unrealistic, bright, colourful player models/skins, the games immersion is completely destroyed. Skins are great as they give you a roadmap of progression (if they are no paid, but earnt) and they give you character individuality. For paid skins, it gives the studios feedback/ more funding to keep renewing and updating the game. The key is to meet in the middle. Remove battle passes and bring in skins that fit within the world that don't make you look too out of place or ridiculous. Its more than evident that the lack of ambition and gamble in modern COD games is what is killing the franchise. There is a reason BF3/4 are so fondly remembered. Do not let this happen to battlefield.
i hate the never ending sniper glint, i wish instead of constantly being on it turns off after a second of you seeing it. that way the enemy has enough time to react and you have enough time to shoot.
As much as I want to be excited for the next Battlefield, I can't not let Andrew Wilson's "tremendous live service" comment linger in my head, and the marketing starting with the Black Ops 6 strategy of "Hey remember these dumb changes that never should have happened? We undid them!" Isn't something we should be praising as highly as people are, congratulations, you did something that shouldn't have even needed to be done if you'd actually understood the assignment at hand. The bit with them saying the game will have double the weapons of BF2042 is a hilariously low bar too, ~45 weapons at launch is still about half of what Battlefield 4 launched with over a decade ago (83). I really want to be excited, but I can't get excited knowing these things.
Get rid of "games as a service". Bring back privately owned servers. Put out a finished product on day one with at least ten maps. Every couple of months, put out DLC with 3 to 4 maps, mew weapons, new vehicles. If you can't afford DLC on release day, wait for a sale
DLC? Paid servers? What happened to free updates? Why do you want to pay for extra content? If they have been doing this for years, then it doesn't seem like the greed changed much. Just changed shape
I love the fact that the community has come to the consensus that Battlefield 4.5 is a fitting term for our dream game. It's pretty much exactly what we and the franchise need to happen for Battlefield to not die
i swear to god people better not start getting hyped over the next battlefield omfg lol. but then again im sure once dice drops le epic nostalgia bait trailer you people are going to buy this garbage wholesale. do not preorder.
man... they said the same for 2042. Right now gaming is such a bad space with live service crap, battlepasses, etc. Better wait until this comes out before even being excited. Let them earn their customers back
A war between NATO and a Mercenary company. Even though it’s a leak, I kinda hope it’s true as that could mean we get more than just American and Russian equipment to play with. Maybe even different vehicles depending on where the map is set.
I don't know how you managed to make a well edited, well researched video with interesting thoughts in such a short period of time, but you did it, great job !
Personally one of the biggest problems with modern shooters is that Devs focus on the competitive scene, with all these metas for guns, attachments and perks. I just want to come home and play, not study a 50 page web article on what perks or attachments give me that 0.01% advantage. I'd be happy with the Battlefield 2 style, where there was no advantages with perks or attachments, it was only based on your personal skill with a chosen weapon.
I’m so glad that Zampella is taking the helm of battlefield. Just look at his track record- Modern Warfare, Titanfall, Apex Legends. Guy is a titan of the industry and I think BF6 is gonna be a classic
2 วันที่ผ่านมา +1
If the game passes the smell test, I shall be a medic that supports my squad ASAP!
I’m cautiously optimistic now which is a miracle because I wasn’t even looking forward to this game at all originally. Reason being is that Vince Zampella is attached to the project. He’s a big name in the FPS scene so it gives me some hope it’ll be good. Regardless, don’t pre-order and don’t take the reveal trailer as what the gameplay will be like.
The first red flag is the global setting. The best Battlefield campaigns all had a connection between their locations other than "the plot happens here". NATO vs a PMC? Yikes.
I mean, considering groups like Wagner exist and operate on a global scale means that they aren’t too far off. Russia uses Wagner to take care of shit that the government can distance themselves from. Take with that what you will.
Definitely not falling for it after the failure of 2042. I’ve learned my lesson after getting hyped for 2042 trailer. They gonna put 80% of their money on the marketing and 20% on the actual development. I’m gonna wait for review and full release if it’s a flop then Rip battlefield for the third time. If it’s an actual Giga Chad and classic masterpiece I’ll be fainting on the cheese floor. Anyways nice vid ;)
At least they've not been developing during covid, which had a huge impact on 2042s botched release. As in, 2020 was the year of the hero shooter/operator shooter, so they changed it to that from a gritty BF4-but-set-in-the-future style game (as you can see in the early early concept art). This time, there's no excuse.
I wish they would add as many armies as in BF1, but nowadays they don't even have the guts to add China, probably not even Rusia. They will make the US fight some "evil mercenary group," and they'll add horrible skins like COD or even bring back the operators. Live service and no DLCs.
I really hope this game is current gen only so we can finally take advantage of the Series X and PS5 hardware. I wanna see this game running at 4k60 on my Series X.
TBH I want a battlefield set in a conflict that hasn't been covered by the series before. This includes modern/near future fictional conflicts. I'd love to see a Battlefield set sometime in the interwar period between WW2, the American Civil War, perhaps even a non-firearms based conflict like the crusades or something. But considering it IS a modern setting, it had BETTER be a proper milsim, not a COD clone. Even BF3/4 were COD clones IMO. Give me 128v128, realistic ballistics, logistics, 1 shot kills at 100 yards with an assault rifle, etc. Having a minimally destructive environment is not enough anymore. I realize I'm jaded, but I do not have faith that this game is going to be anything but absolute cheeks, with a battle royale mode and lootboxes galore. Also, get your eyes checked. 5:17 looks quite literally NOTHING like a Blackhawk. Not tryna be rude dude but glasses may be a requirement lol.
Remember, soldiers: Do NOT preorder! Let's hope it lives up to our hopes and expectations once we've seen gameplay footage of the CTE. Personally, I hope it's like BF3 (sound, character callouts, atmosphere, advancement in graphics and map quality coupled with a mixture of various gameplay improvements, modern combat gadgets and vehicular variety made by BF4, with more modernized smooth animations and movement. Also, only 64 players sounds abit disappointing to me, as i feel like 80 players or 100 players could be a good sweet spot to fill up all vehicles and sense of scale to the battlefield; but if the map designs are as good as in BF3 then maybe i'll find it satisfactory. 64 player count felt like it was soooo next gen back in the days, but my dream has always been even more players. Albiet BF2042 taught us just how important good map design and scale is over sheer player count. This game is gonna make or break the future of this beloved franchise. I'm cautiously optimistic going forward.
I know everyone is mad at a BR being most likely added but it's not DICE making it this time around. A different studio entirely dedicated to a free to play element of Battlefield can only benefit the franchise. Bring more players to the game and thus more money which gives the devs a bigger budget for new games.
I'll be a bit disappointed if the conflict ends up being is nato vs a made up faction. I guess having russia, iran and china as the opposition is still a no go. But well we won't really know until we actually see what the game will be about
that's a really good start if they're going back to what worked with bf3 and bf4....that's what they should've done IN THE FIRST GODDAMN PLACE!... 63 player count and current day setting THANK YOU....no more enemies flying and gliding all over the goddamn place and getting shoot at from every direction
I really hope a battle pass and skins dont ruin the feeling and aesthetic of the game. That's one thing I liked about battlefield 4 was each side having specific gear and soliders that gave them a certain look and character. Modern warfare 2019 was the first call of duty I really enjoyed in years but after a while they had the ramp the skins so people would buy them and it didnt take long until everyone was bright colors and shooting lazers. Dont even get me started on the other modern modern warfares.
Extremely low quality standards. We're simply getting bf3/4 recycled and that's it. People are losing their minds over being able to replay games that have been out for 10+ years lol.
Yes two armies going head to head is good. Although it should not been some "PMCs" or terrorist etc. It needs to be clear, real world countries just like earlier. Russia vs. NATO, China vs. USA in Pacific etc. PMCs could be DLC like awesome "Special Forces" was with legendary Battlefield 2. No fantasy pkease but real life countries in fictional modern conflict.
of course 2042 doesnt hold up compared to bt3-4 but i did really enjoy customizing my weapon while running around, helped me change my approach from long distance to cqb areas while playing conquest
2042 was still leagues better than the new MW3,especially now that it’s a lot less buggy than at launch. I reinstalled it like a month ago and I have been having a ton of fun playing it again. Portal was the best at launch when you could choose the era you wanted to play but now the whole game is good
Man I really hope I get my abrams back and not some future tank. And if I cant have my abrams at least make it that Abrams X or whatever that prototype was lol
All DICE needs to do….nameless and faceless soldiers like BF3 and BF4. And they’ll be fine. Stop putting weird Fortnite skins and Starbucks baristas as classes.
All of these are promises we've gotten before and all i can do is eyeroll. I don't understand how fans are excited for a game we've yet to seen shit of.
So pulling an Xbox with the previous Battlefield title in Battlefield 1 wasn't enough. Now they're going to call the next Battlefield, Battlefield pulling another Xbox. I say that as a joke, but honestly I wouldn't be surprised if Xbox made another Xbox and just called the Xbox.
It would be great if we had more than just generic NATO faction and generic PMC faction with different factions fighting in different environments. U.S. vs. Taliban, Russia vs. Ukraine, Israel vs. Hamas, U.S. vs China. Each faction with different equipment and weapons that force teams to use different strategies to fight the opposing team.
![PURPEECH - นี่ฉันเองคนที่... (It's me) [Official MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/NuhHd0hOOg8/mqdefault.jpg)
DO NOT PREORDER!
Never again... Last time I got burned was 2017 battlefront 2
like farming
Made that mistake with 2042, never again
@@ImBored8141 Dude them not letting me refund still pisses me off to this day. lol
@@ImBored8141Fr💀 My first ever pre-order too🤣 I should've known from the BETA
I honestly am just sick of battle pass and shops having weird skins and very overpriced skins on an already 70$ game I really hope they can find a way to make it better
Im sorry, but this is the new wave, weather you like it or not you have to accept it, and look at the good side of it: new maps and new weapons are free
@@claudio6572Unless you are FLAT OUT BROKE you're getting screwed. There is a cost for "free" and that cost is the loss of maps, weapons, skins, etc. and all done at a HIGH quality that we used to get.
The math is very simple. Look at the count and delivery pace of new maps, game modes, and vehicles in the Battlefield 2, 3, and 4 expansion packs. Then look at the same stats for Battlefield 2042's "free" bullshit. It's less than a quarter the count of those.
@@RyneLanders ok
@@claudio6572 show me the lie. How many new maps did 2042 put out? How fast was that? Battlefield 3 had 5 expansions with 20 new maps (some of the best the franchise has ever seen), numerous new gameplay modes, a bunch of new vehicles and weapons, and skins. And the expansions were on sale constantly so you could pick them up cheap.
@@RyneLandersif your broke you won't be able to buy premium either so in away your kind of screwed both ways
The main thing that modern shooters lack is grit and seriousness. Yes we are all playing these games for fun but when you have ridiculously cheesy, unrealistic, bright, colourful player models/skins, the games immersion is completely destroyed. Skins are great as they give you a roadmap of progression (if they are no paid, but earnt) and they give you character individuality. For paid skins, it gives the studios feedback/ more funding to keep renewing and updating the game. The key is to meet in the middle. Remove battle passes and bring in skins that fit within the world that don't make you look too out of place or ridiculous. Its more than evident that the lack of ambition and gamble in modern COD games is what is killing the franchise. There is a reason BF3/4 are so fondly remembered. Do not let this happen to battlefield.
i hate the never ending sniper glint, i wish instead of constantly being on it turns off after a second of you seeing it. that way the enemy has enough time to react and you have enough time to shoot.
Ah the cancerous battlepass
PLEASE DICE… DONT MESS THIS UP!!!
Dice may not be saints, but the people who are responsible for most of the bullshit in recent battlefied titles are EA
Fair point, I’m just tired of the constant failure. For me it started with Star Wars battlefront 2015 and it’s just been fail after failure.
They already messed this, did you noticed AI art, ffs.
I'm still mad that BFV didn't get a Eastern front expansion
Be happy u at least got a Mosin-gernade launcher.
We didn't get a proper navy or Italians.😢
bfv was an expansion its self
Bfv was made with PC in mind first unfortunately. The UI, the controls, everything literally felt off. Aiming was crap. Sigh.
I would listen to a 30 minute video about the cosmonaut’s opinions on different types of sedimentary rocks
DO NOT PREORDER
As much as I want to be excited for the next Battlefield, I can't not let Andrew Wilson's "tremendous live service" comment linger in my head, and the marketing starting with the Black Ops 6 strategy of "Hey remember these dumb changes that never should have happened? We undid them!" Isn't something we should be praising as highly as people are, congratulations, you did something that shouldn't have even needed to be done if you'd actually understood the assignment at hand.
The bit with them saying the game will have double the weapons of BF2042 is a hilariously low bar too, ~45 weapons at launch is still about half of what Battlefield 4 launched with over a decade ago (83).
I really want to be excited, but I can't get excited knowing these things.
Get rid of "games as a service". Bring back privately owned servers. Put out a finished product on day one with at least ten maps. Every couple of months, put out DLC with 3 to 4 maps, mew weapons, new vehicles. If you can't afford DLC on release day, wait for a sale
DLC? Paid servers? What happened to free updates? Why do you want to pay for extra content? If they have been doing this for years, then it doesn't seem like the greed changed much. Just changed shape
Because we got content, the amount of stuff that got added to 2042 in it's entire lifetime is less than 1 dlc for bf4..@@eamonncowan2839
I love the fact that the community has come to the consensus that Battlefield 4.5 is a fitting term for our dream game. It's pretty much exactly what we and the franchise need to happen for Battlefield to not die
i swear to god people better not start getting hyped over the next battlefield omfg lol. but then again im sure once dice drops le epic nostalgia bait trailer you people are going to buy this garbage wholesale. do not preorder.
10000000000% this a nostalgic trailer hyped up le epic is the first thing we fall for.
Not gonna fall for it again
man... they said the same for 2042. Right now gaming is such a bad space with live service crap, battlepasses, etc. Better wait until this comes out before even being excited. Let them earn their customers back
A war between NATO and a Mercenary company. Even though it’s a leak, I kinda hope it’s true as that could mean we get more than just American and Russian equipment to play with. Maybe even different vehicles depending on where the map is set.
so basically amerimutts vs wagner/dogwater pmc?
@@chlorhexidine2506 or russimutts vs pmc.
@chlorhexidine2506 u have an inferiority complex, as most of the world does with the U.S.A
Oh my some words!!! Don't forget Portal was a love letter to BF Fans and remember how it died almost immediately?
Give me the best parts of 4 and 1. One of those parts HAS to be the BF1 headshot sound. Loved it.
This before another Lego video is crazy
Blame EA for dropping news on a random Monday
@@thecosmonaut4221Blame EA for ending Battlefront II's live service 😭
Remember: do what ever the hell you want. Idc
I don't know how you managed to make a well edited, well researched video with interesting thoughts in such a short period of time, but you did it, great job !
Since the initial reveal I’ve gotten probably 12 accumulative hours of sleep
@@thecosmonaut4221 ahah
Remember, no pre-order
There is a reason why spend around 600 hours of bf1, go back to that formula
BF1's immersion and it's special classes (sentries and flame troopers) were amazing
Personally one of the biggest problems with modern shooters is that Devs focus on the competitive scene, with all these metas for guns, attachments and perks.
I just want to come home and play, not study a 50 page web article on what perks or attachments give me that 0.01% advantage.
I'd be happy with the Battlefield 2 style, where there was no advantages with perks or attachments, it was only based on your personal skill with a chosen weapon.
This guy gets it
No one going to talk about how they use ai for there showcase
Wait wha
@@thecosmonaut4221 You didn’t know that ea was using ai for there showcase?
@@funny-gv3ml oh I thought you meant the concept art was Ai generated
@@thecosmonaut4221 it was
@@Swaguleyholy shit you’re right
we MIGHT be back bros
I’m so glad that Zampella is taking the helm of battlefield. Just look at his track record- Modern Warfare, Titanfall, Apex Legends. Guy is a titan of the industry and I think BF6 is gonna be a classic
If the game passes the smell test, I shall be a medic that supports my squad ASAP!
why am I hyped by just looking at fucking concept art😭
I’m cautiously optimistic now which is a miracle because I wasn’t even looking forward to this game at all originally. Reason being is that Vince Zampella is attached to the project. He’s a big name in the FPS scene so it gives me some hope it’ll be good. Regardless, don’t pre-order and don’t take the reveal trailer as what the gameplay will be like.
Don't get hyped... don't get hyped... don't get hyped... oh, no...
"DO NOT PREORDER" seems the new slogan for the new Battlefield lol
The first red flag is the global setting. The best Battlefield campaigns all had a connection between their locations other than "the plot happens here". NATO vs a PMC? Yikes.
I mean, considering groups like Wagner exist and operate on a global scale means that they aren’t too far off. Russia uses Wagner to take care of shit that the government can distance themselves from. Take with that what you will.
"We've been here before"
Time to get on the Hype Train🤞
What's that kratos quote? "Keep your expectations low and you shall never be dissapointed, boy"
Definitely not falling for it after the failure of 2042. I’ve learned my lesson after getting hyped for 2042 trailer. They gonna put 80% of their money on the marketing and 20% on the actual development. I’m gonna wait for review and full release if it’s a flop then Rip battlefield for the third time. If it’s an actual Giga Chad and classic masterpiece I’ll be fainting on the cheese floor. Anyways nice vid ;)
Simple, bring back class system and thats it..... Specialist bored as hell
@@adieraditz if they pull out a Battlefield bad company or 3 on us I’ll DEFINITELY faint on that cheese floor fr.
@@heatgamer7008 bad company isn't that bad, except single player
@@adieraditz I’ll be selling my soul for an other bad company campaign
At least they've not been developing during covid, which had a huge impact on 2042s botched release. As in, 2020 was the year of the hero shooter/operator shooter, so they changed it to that from a gritty BF4-but-set-in-the-future style game (as you can see in the early early concept art). This time, there's no excuse.
Hope there lots of factions to play as,would be cool
You need to stop hyping this up. It’s just concept art
The scoreboard is such a meme 😂
EA! DON'T MESS THIS UP!... AND MY LIFE!... IS YOURS!
That picture gives me Karkand vibes. I like it.
Apparently it’s Gibraltar
As excited as i am, dont pre-order. Lets wait and see
Exactly bro because if this game failed there's no more battlefield
5:01 to me the jets look like MIG-29s or SU-27 jets could be wrong though
I can definitely see them being MIG-29s
I hope first person melee attacks return, BF1 had the best melee gameplay
Please no more hero characters and stupid skins I can’t take it anymore
What a world we live in
People need to be reminded not to pre-order 💀
Operators are gonna come back but it'll be the traditional class systems
Remember, no preorders.
This will for sure be have a war thunder type mode
Thus the honeymoon period begins
I hope it brings back BF4 gaming system
Fucking please dice please. It’s been a long wait my battlefield friends. Let’s hope this run doesn’t fail as bad as 2042
I wish they would add as many armies as in BF1, but nowadays they don't even have the guts to add China, probably not even Rusia. They will make the US fight some "evil mercenary group," and they'll add horrible skins like COD or even bring back the operators. Live service and no DLCs.
I really hope this game is current gen only so we can finally take advantage of the Series X and PS5 hardware. I wanna see this game running at 4k60 on my Series X.
It would be nice if they also made a eastern front dlc for the bf5 just to make the game feel whole and completed
It'd be pretty cool if they took maps like Amiens from Battlefield 1 but modern day
The jet and helicopter physics were horrible in 2042. Chances of them bringing back the old BF4 BF3 gameplay feel are anorexic at best.
I hope it drops in spring ‘25. Don’t think it should try to compete with gta6
TBH I want a battlefield set in a conflict that hasn't been covered by the series before. This includes modern/near future fictional conflicts. I'd love to see a Battlefield set sometime in the interwar period between WW2, the American Civil War, perhaps even a non-firearms based conflict like the crusades or something. But considering it IS a modern setting, it had BETTER be a proper milsim, not a COD clone. Even BF3/4 were COD clones IMO. Give me 128v128, realistic ballistics, logistics, 1 shot kills at 100 yards with an assault rifle, etc. Having a minimally destructive environment is not enough anymore. I realize I'm jaded, but I do not have faith that this game is going to be anything but absolute cheeks, with a battle royale mode and lootboxes galore. Also, get your eyes checked. 5:17 looks quite literally NOTHING like a Blackhawk. Not tryna be rude dude but glasses may be a requirement lol.
4 hours of sleep made me see a black hawk
A Korean War Era Battlefield would be interesting.
Remember, soldiers: Do NOT preorder!
Let's hope it lives up to our hopes and expectations once we've seen gameplay footage of the CTE.
Personally, I hope it's like BF3 (sound, character callouts, atmosphere, advancement in graphics and map quality coupled with a mixture of various gameplay improvements, modern combat gadgets and vehicular variety made by BF4, with more modernized smooth animations and movement.
Also, only 64 players sounds abit disappointing to me, as i feel like 80 players or 100 players could be a good sweet spot to fill up all vehicles and sense of scale to the battlefield; but if the map designs are as good as in BF3 then maybe i'll find it satisfactory. 64 player count felt like it was soooo next gen back in the days, but my dream has always been even more players. Albiet BF2042 taught us just how important good map design and scale is over sheer player count.
This game is gonna make or break the future of this beloved franchise. I'm cautiously optimistic going forward.
I know everyone is mad at a BR being most likely added but it's not DICE making it this time around. A different studio entirely dedicated to a free to play element of Battlefield can only benefit the franchise. Bring more players to the game and thus more money which gives the devs a bigger budget for new games.
They already had a br for bf 5
I would’ve had my eye brows raised if they mentioned hardline and bc2
"Pickup and move downed players", PTSD FLASHBACKS
I'll be a bit disappointed if the conflict ends up being is nato vs a made up faction.
I guess having russia, iran and china as the opposition is still a no go.
But well we won't really know until we actually see what the game will be about
Wasn't it "leak" a few years back of it just being u.s. and nato vs some random pmc group
I would low-key like soldier customization like in BF4 W camo or in BF5 like the head race or helmet ect
Next year is BF2's 20th anniversary 👀
EA has to look at Ubisoft and NOT FUCK THIS UP
The title should be Battlefield: World at War 😂
that's a really good start if they're going back to what worked with bf3 and bf4....that's what they should've done IN THE FIRST GODDAMN PLACE!... 63 player count and current day setting THANK YOU....no more enemies flying and gliding all over the goddamn place and getting shoot at from every direction
I really hope a battle pass and skins dont ruin the feeling and aesthetic of the game. That's one thing I liked about battlefield 4 was each side having specific gear and soliders that gave them a certain look and character. Modern warfare 2019 was the first call of duty I really enjoyed in years but after a while they had the ramp the skins so people would buy them and it didnt take long until everyone was bright colors and shooting lazers. Dont even get me started on the other modern modern warfares.
i havent touched a casual shooter in 8 years, ill spend a lot of money to relive BF3/4/BC2 so if they make a good choice im in
I dont want to see a single "PMC faction"... Those are so boring.
2042 was best sounding BF game yet but look how it ended up.
Remember… no pre-orders
They said "Back to Basics" when BF5 was being developed. Don't shill out your money until the game and reviews are out
OK. I am going to buy Battlefield 4 when it is release in 2025.
I just hope the factions are US, EU NATO, RUSSIA, China. and maybe Japan jsdf?
Based Chito enjoyer...
How people can even be excited for a dice game i will never know
same way people get excited by COD game
They've made decent games at worst and peak at best. I might be a minority but i'm incredibly excited for this
@@mesuper455
I was incredibly excited for bf2042. I preordered it for 90$
This is my biggest regret in video game history…
Extremely low quality standards. We're simply getting bf3/4 recycled and that's it. People are losing their minds over being able to replay games that have been out for 10+ years lol.
Never again we say never again.
They will do us again just you watch
the answer lies in simply playing a game about soldiers
BF5 BR was really good. It sucks that they let it die.
PLEASE BE GOOD THIS TIME
also you thought we wouldn't notice you sneaking a clip from girls' last tour there 5:44
Yes two armies going head to head is good. Although it should not been some "PMCs" or terrorist etc. It needs to be clear, real world countries just like earlier. Russia vs. NATO, China vs. USA in Pacific etc. PMCs could be DLC like awesome "Special Forces" was with legendary Battlefield 2. No fantasy pkease but real life countries in fictional modern conflict.
V Still playing BF1 button
This is their last chance.
WAIT ONE WEEK AFTER THE GLOBAL RELEASE TO BUY THE GAME
Best summation of the recent BF news. Great work Cosmonaut 🫡
No preorders!
of course 2042 doesnt hold up compared to bt3-4 but i did really enjoy customizing my weapon while running around, helped me change my approach from long distance to cqb areas while playing conquest
2042 was still leagues better than the new MW3,especially now that it’s a lot less buggy than at launch. I reinstalled it like a month ago and I have been having a ton of fun playing it again. Portal was the best at launch when you could choose the era you wanted to play but now the whole game is good
DO NOT PREORDER THATS THEIR SAFETY NET
CTE is the most important thing for the next game's success.
Man I really hope I get my abrams back and not some future tank. And if I cant have my abrams at least make it that Abrams X or whatever that prototype was lol
Can Vince make a battlefield game? The word "dense" makes it sound like maps are small and filled with containers for campers. To COD
All DICE needs to do….nameless and faceless soldiers like BF3 and BF4. And they’ll be fine. Stop putting weird Fortnite skins and Starbucks baristas as classes.
Let me guess, it's going to be a "love letter to the fans" 😂
All of these are promises we've gotten before and all i can do is eyeroll. I don't understand how fans are excited for a game we've yet to seen shit of.
So pulling an Xbox with the previous Battlefield title in Battlefield 1 wasn't enough. Now they're going to call the next Battlefield, Battlefield pulling another Xbox.
I say that as a joke, but honestly I wouldn't be surprised if Xbox made another Xbox and just called the Xbox.
It would be great if we had more than just generic NATO faction and generic PMC faction with different factions fighting in different environments. U.S. vs. Taliban, Russia vs. Ukraine, Israel vs. Hamas, U.S. vs China. Each faction with different equipment and weapons that force teams to use different strategies to fight the opposing team.
i want a special gift for getting the 100$ version