Could A Modern Warship Flotilla Win The 1942 Battle Of Midway? (Naval Battle 93) |DCS

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 พ.ค. 2024
  • We simulate a naval confrontation between the Imperial Japanese Naval Fleets from the 1942 Battle of Midway against a mixed coalition modernized frigate, destroyer and cruiser flotilla. How far has naval technology progress in 80 years?
    0:00 Overview & Details
    2:56 Battle!
    PATREON: / grimreapers
    RUMBLE: rumble.com/c/c-2381990
    ODYSEE: odysee.com/@grimreapers:e
    USEFUL LINKS
    GRIM REAPERS (TH-cam): / @grimreapers
    GRIM REAPERS 2 (TH-cam): / @grimreapers2
    GR PODCASTS: anchor.fm/grim-reapers
    DCS TUTORIALS: / @grimreapers
    DCS BUYERS GUIDE: • DCS World Module Quick...
    DONATE/SUPPORT GRIM REAPERS
    MERCHANDISE: www.redbubble.com/people/grme...
    PATREON monthly donations: / grimreapers
    PAYPAL one-off donations: www.paypal.me/GrimReapersDona...
    SOCIAL MEDIA
    WEBSITE: grimreapers.net/
    STREAM(Cap): / grimreaperscap
    FACEBOOK: / grimreapersgroup
    TWITTER: / grimreapers_
    DISCORD: / discord
    THANK YOU TO: Mission Makers, Admin, Staff, Helpers, Donators & Viewers(without which, this could not happen) xx
    #GRNavalBattle #DCSNavalBattle #Cruiser #Destroyer #Ticonderoga #Type45 #Type055 #SM6 #P800 #BattleOfMidway #AircraftCarrier #WWII #WorldWar2 #Aviation #AviationGaming #FlightSimulators #Military
  • เกม

ความคิดเห็น • 1.3K

  • @CyberKnightX21
    @CyberKnightX21 ปีที่แล้ว +690

    Yamato versus Iowa class. Upgraded Iowa class that was set up for the Gulf war.😊

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  ปีที่แล้ว +58

      th-cam.com/video/7ZFd4yLlwwA/w-d-xo.html

    • @omenaccipio
      @omenaccipio ปีที่แล้ว +18

      ​@@grimreapers but that is not the 1990s upgraded Iowas.

    • @DragonstarFighter
      @DragonstarFighter ปีที่แล้ว +28

      It wouldn't be a fight... not even close

    • @Fix_Bayonets
      @Fix_Bayonets ปีที่แล้ว +25

      There were unused Yamato armor pieces the US got from the ship yard and an Iowa class cut through it like butter. Drak did a what if battle of Leyte Gulf, very entertaining.

    • @StalinLovsMsmZioglowfagz
      @StalinLovsMsmZioglowfagz ปีที่แล้ว

      I’m IJN, all TFW- always love an underdog.

  • @MravacKid
    @MravacKid ปีที่แล้ว +655

    I'd say it's safe to assume that DCS is not quite ready to be a realistic naval battle simulator. :)

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  ปีที่แล้ว +142

      Correct. Naval side is more game than sim.

    • @Smokeyr67
      @Smokeyr67 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      Nor an accurate air combat simulation, but it does it's best with the information available :)

    • @dcacklam
      @dcacklam ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Command: Modern Air Naval Operations, or Harpoon 3....

    • @Smokeyr67
      @Smokeyr67 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@dcacklam Harpoon was a great sim, but very buggy when it was first released :(

    • @youraveragecapybara
      @youraveragecapybara ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@Smokeyr67 it is easly one of the most acurate sims for Air combat in the world (that is publicly availible)

  • @Keezfocer
    @Keezfocer 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    It’s noteworthy that not all Japanese ships were sunk at Midway. The 5 cruisers probably could have fired all their anti-ship missiles, crippled the Japanese fleet, and then withdrawn with no losses, and that alone would have been considered a major success.
    These guys actually managed to sink significantly more ships that the Americans did in the real battle.

  • @Silversiren28
    @Silversiren28 ปีที่แล้ว +618

    I predict that just 2 American cruisers and 2 American destroyers would mop the floor with that fleet, no issues.

    • @rainerbehrendt9330
      @rainerbehrendt9330 ปีที่แล้ว +58

      Depends on the amount of Enemy Aircrafts. John Schettler has written about this scenario in his Kirow Series. The Kirow against a Japanese Carrier Group. If your SAMs run out its Game Over.

    • @splatoonistproductions5345
      @splatoonistproductions5345 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      Honestly 2 of anything would be overkill

    • @cranjismcbasketball613
      @cranjismcbasketball613 ปีที่แล้ว +65

      I feel the biggest issue is that MOST of the ship launches munitions don’t have big enough warheads to get through the armor belts of warships of that time period. Especially battleships. Not shooting down your idea, just giving my two cents

    • @ashtiboy
      @ashtiboy ปีที่แล้ว +33

      @@cranjismcbasketball613 well but the top of the decks that the sm-2 and sm-6 missles love to hit would be far more powerufl hits snece they actaly dont aim for the ship armor belts they aim for the top decks of the of the ships at a angle when they are in thermal impact pase. also it doent tanke much for a sm2 or sm-6 mssiles to blow up all the gunnery crew on those world war 2 ships sub capatal anti air and anti ship guns with the exposed crew wihout any hull or amory in the way. so alot of the kigsake class ships very expoesed AAA gun battrys with very litle protaction for those gunner crew memebers. also world war two naval ship amor realy sucks agest modern warheads of sm-2 and sm-6 basce the naval world war ships dident use any form of amor procation other just very very thick steel plates without any form of other ways of stoping modern anti amor weapons would go thoew a wold war two ships 750mm+ thick armor like a 1000F hot knife giong threw cheap bugit toilet paper.

    • @CrazynToughKiwi
      @CrazynToughKiwi ปีที่แล้ว +36

      ​@@rainerbehrendt9330 idk, that's a lot of CIWS fire to brave

  • @JonathanHStone
    @JonathanHStone ปีที่แล้ว +270

    In what world would modern ships with all of their situational awareness come anywhere near the range of the Yamato, instead kiting just out of its range to fire their own missiles or call in additional attacks?

    • @nigeldepledge3790
      @nigeldepledge3790 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      Well, they had all run out of missiles; and Yamato's 18" guns outranged the modern naval guns, so what else could they do?

    • @JonathanHStone
      @JonathanHStone ปีที่แล้ว +56

      @@nigeldepledge3790 leave the scene? Also, as with the last episode, they seem to forgo the use of Tomahawks, which would certainly be effective.

    • @RCAvhstape
      @RCAvhstape ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Getting within battleship gun range is like picking a fight with Superman. Not gonna end well for you and your thin modern armor.

    • @JimmyDoresHairDye
      @JimmyDoresHairDye ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@nigeldepledge3790 Carry more harpoons???
      The solution is: more SAM's, more anti ship missiles, and more CIWS w/more ammo. You can remain 60+ nm away from any enemy ship and score kill shots on all of them. The Japanese fleet adds more planes? Add more RIM 174's (or navalize the AIM260) and CIWS systems.

    • @nigeldepledge3790
      @nigeldepledge3790 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @J D - you mean they should reload the entire VLS in the middle of the battle? I didn't think of that.
      Or did you mean that they should've gone into the battle with bigger ships (and hence larger magazines)?
      I don't quite see which part of the scenario you didn't understand.

  • @ifga16
    @ifga16 ปีที่แล้ว +192

    In reality, Adm. Yamamoto wasn't crazy enough to do a suicide type run after having his fleet take such a hammering from these super weapons. He would have made a fast retreat to save his ships for the planned final showdown that was planned for.

    • @V-RADIO
      @V-RADIO ปีที่แล้ว +20

      I honestly think shock and awe from that opening salvo probably would have chased the Japanese off as fast as they could.

    • @isaacibbotson4632
      @isaacibbotson4632 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Remember though that at the end of the battle of midway the Japanese admiral was sailing a carrier in with the rest of the fleet for a surface engagement. It's entirely possible that the red must would have settled in and he would have suicided the fleet. It happened in the real thing too

    • @shortlivedglory3314
      @shortlivedglory3314 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      In reality, none of those ships would be functional after taking five modern missiles. Many of them would be done after one or two.

    • @ReaverLordTonus
      @ReaverLordTonus ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Agreed, he wasn't a fool, and didn't actually prescribe to the rest of his country's military doctrine of short term, fighting to the death stuff. I'd like to think if we hadn't killed him when we did he would have voiced some objection over the introduction of Kamakazis.

    • @ifga16
      @ifga16 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@ReaverLordTonus Unfortunately, the admiral was a 'company man' who possibly objected to the kamikaze idea but would not have stood in the way considering the mind set of the military ruling class which Yamamoto was part of.

  • @ogFIEND
    @ogFIEND ปีที่แล้ว +46

    Congratulations on your new family member, Cap!

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      thxx

    • @exidy-yt
      @exidy-yt ปีที่แล้ว

      @@grimreapers You poor bastard. I went through this time period twice, and nearly resigned/got fired each time. Best of luck, Cap!

  • @blaircolquhoun7780
    @blaircolquhoun7780 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    The first book of the Axis of Time trilogy was about this. An American carrier battle group from 2020 goes back to Midway.

    • @nakross4010
      @nakross4010 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I loved those books so much. The Australian Thunder Run and HMS Trident's defense during "Operation Sea Dragon" were easily the best parts of the series.
      Heck, I'd say every one of those battles would make a great GR video.

    • @PhoenixT70
      @PhoenixT70 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Finally, someone showing these books some love. I would love to see GR recreate at least one of those fights.

    • @nakross4010
      @nakross4010 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      ​@@PhoenixT70 I remember reading the books in 2006, set in the not-so-far future of 2021 😂
      Unfortunately our timeline's quite a let down eh bud? No high speed trimaran frigates, hypersonic combat maces or Metalstorm CIWS!
      Seems like we're getting close to flexipads though, so it's not all that bad!

    • @PhoenixT70
      @PhoenixT70 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@nakross4010 The most hilarious things for me were carrier-borne Raptors, depleted uranium rifle rounds, and an aircraft carrier named for Hillary Clinton. I read them in 2019 or 2020 as well.

    • @blaircolquhoun7780
      @blaircolquhoun7780 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@PhoenixT70 Me too. The Yamato Class was supposed to be three ships. Yamato, Musashi, and Shinano. Shinano was converted into the first supercarrier. She was sunk by the American submarine USS Archerfish. Now, F-14 Tomcat v. Shinano, that would be good for GR to model.

  • @DaveC2729
    @DaveC2729 ปีที่แล้ว +74

    I think after that bombardment, there's a good chance the Yamato might be nonoperational even if it was still afloat. Those missiles might not go through the main armor bands, but they weren't trying to. Those missiles were hitting the decks, with armor only a few inches thick, and the superstructure, even thinner than that. That ship was completely gutted. The ammo would probably have exploded.

    • @fnhatic6694
      @fnhatic6694 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      Yeah that's what I was thinking. In real life, these massive ships were frequently done in by lucky strikes from weapons that should've really pose too much a threat, just by hitting fuel and ammo. Yamato would've been finished after a hit from just a couple of the AShMs, those things can absolutely punch clean through a ship.

    • @tetraxis3011
      @tetraxis3011 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Doubt. It seems the UK thought Harpoons wouldn’t do anything tho the ARA Belgrano. That’s why they sunk it with a submarine.

    • @mrspeigle1
      @mrspeigle1 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Remember bbs were designed to tank hits from 1500 lb ap shells, a 1k non armor piercing bomb isn't going to pen the citidel.

    • @darthkarl99
      @darthkarl99 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      The ammo is all inside the armour. Battleships don;t just have a thick belt, they have a main armour deck that spans across the top as well. In the Yamato's case she has 8 inches of deck armour. You could probably so devastate the area's outside the citadel that she's unable to maneuver and her ability to fight is extremly limited, (the turrets have their own rangefinders and are even more heavily armoured so they still be able to fire, but with limited accuracy.
      For that matter i think some of the carriers at midway had the significant armour and would likely resist sinking for a similar reason, (though damaging them to the point they were unable to fight would be much easier).
      The cruisers and destroyers could probably be sunk that way as they aren't armoured that well.
      When they were actually sunk the Yamato and her sister ship each took over 20 armour piercing bombs and dozens of torpedoes. Musashi in particular proved to be a complete pain to put down, lessons learned from that were used when attacking Yamato which is why she took less, but each of those bombs was equivalent to a modern deep penetrator bunker buster bomb, not a regular cruise missile, LGB, or anti-shipping missile.
      The biggest advantage in this hypothetical scenario modern tech would have is that japanese damage control was notoriously poor.

    • @DaveC2729
      @DaveC2729 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@darthkarl99 I have to question that bit about being the equivalent of a modern bunker buster bomb. Maybe in size. Maybe. But I highly doubt they were the equivalent in terms of penetrating ability. Still, the bombs pretty much disabled Yamato, didn't they?
      But I think we can both agree that bombs and missiles striking the deck and superstructure could never sink Yamato by themselves. I think it was the torpedoes that did that, in the end, wasn't it? Bombs couldn't really damage her below the water line. In the case of matching Yamato up with those modern ships, they wouldn't be able to sink her at all without having torpedoes at their disposal, but I still say she'd be completely, or almost completely, disabled.
      Even if the missiles couldn't penetrate a magazine, I'd expect they would interfere with the ammo feed system. That system's likely not delicate, but neither are guided missiles. How much bending and warping from nearby missile strikes can it take, even if they can't actually penetrate the mechanism itself? I would think that when it was over, even if the guns weren't affected directly, Yamato's crew wouldn't be able to load them.
      I'd also mention that modern warship crews would be much more precise with their missiles than the gamers and software that were controlling the simulation. They'd have scored far more hits, and would've had a better idea where to put the missiles for the greatest effect.
      And yeah, there's that poor Japanese damage control you pointed out. They'd probably be having a bit of trouble with fires, and their firefighting pumps and plumbing would've taken some damage too.

  • @ammoalamo6485
    @ammoalamo6485 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    At Leyte Gulf the IJN's big armor piercing shells actually passed through the US destroyers and destroyer escorts. The US ships were still badly damaged, and one or two sunk, but their thin skin was not thick enough to arm the armor-piercing warheads of the enemy big guns. I can't imaging a shell drilling a hole right through my ship, somewhere between 14" and 18" in diameter.

  • @danielearley5062
    @danielearley5062 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Many modern warships have a combination of propulsion systems. UK frigates and destroyers have combined gas turbine and diesel electric drives. The gas turbines in the T23 are the Spey gas turbines, which were marinised versions of the engines that were in Buccaneers and Phantoms, and Olympus gas turbines, which were the same engines as Concorde, also marinised. Woof!

  • @ZackHab
    @ZackHab ปีที่แล้ว +20

    Congratulations on your baby!!!

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      thxx

    • @blackjed
      @blackjed ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Baby grim reaper has been unleashed upon this earth. The world best watch put!

  • @OG_Mac79
    @OG_Mac79 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    If they were staggered in 2 groups the russia/china ships in first with the hypersonics then after their ship missiles are expended the usa/uk/japan ships come in range and clean up with fewer repeat targets. We practiced that at rimpac in the 90's when I was in the Navy.

  • @totalnerd5674
    @totalnerd5674 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    You're a real trooper doing this on little to no sleep and with your baby

  • @kevinriffey9970
    @kevinriffey9970 ปีที่แล้ว +114

    Would be nice if the zeros would circle the carriers to form proper squadrons.

    • @wowwowwow8765
      @wowwowwow8765 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Would it matter?

    • @kevinriffey9970
      @kevinriffey9970 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@wowwowwow8765 would stop them from flying off alone to be picked off one by one.

    • @redpillcoach1855
      @redpillcoach1855 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@wowwowwow8765 It would matter when the Phalanx runs out of bullets.

  • @miauwgabriel3547
    @miauwgabriel3547 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Congratulations on your new "people" in your family! I wish you the best in the future.

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  ปีที่แล้ว

      thxx

    • @LordElpme
      @LordElpme ปีที่แล้ว

      Is there such a thing as a HOTAS plushie? I feel there probably should be

  • @GustavSvard
    @GustavSvard ปีที่แล้ว +20

    Like you pointed out in the commentary, there sure was a ton of target duplication and the anti-ship missiles didn't target the carriers til towards the end. i.e. with an AI that prioritizes more like an actual human captain would, and coordinated like humans would (I'm sure the blue captains could have split the ship targets up quite well, someone on the Russian & Chinese bridges would speak English) then it would have gone better for the blue team.

    • @V-RADIO
      @V-RADIO ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Makes me wish he could get players to run the Japanese fleet.

  • @juanisosa22
    @juanisosa22 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    One thing that you could do to simulate the proper target deconfliction from the SAM and anti-ship missiles is to stagger the ships that are able to fire. Turn off the fire control of 3 of the ships until the first one is out of ammo. At that point enable the second ship and repeat until all ammo is expended.

  • @dmkolb1977
    @dmkolb1977 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    The American ships would have never gotten that close. They would have stayed out of range of the enemy ships and sunk everything without a scratch.

    • @Filo-qn8pj
      @Filo-qn8pj ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Yep, Cap just wanted to make it fun by making them attack. In real life they would stay away.

    • @kevino1219
      @kevino1219 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      All those modern war ship have that capability. The US ship just has WAY more of it.

  • @trev8591
    @trev8591 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Congratulations on the acquisition of 1 x Mini-Reaper, Cap!

  • @Plastikdoom
    @Plastikdoom ปีที่แล้ว +21

    Not of they were using AP, they wouldn’t even fuse against those modern ships, it’d hole punch them, and that’s all. It’d be like the last stand of Taffy 3, that’s why it worked so well, they were shooting AP against escort destroyers, and they were just going right through, instead of exploding. Wasn’t until they switched to HE they really did damage and sunk them.

  • @Ragnaroknrol
    @Ragnaroknrol ปีที่แล้ว +20

    Can you set some of the ships to not fire until ordered to? Missiles hitting the same target from multiple ships was part of the issue. I would also have had the attack VTOLS go in low and on the flank to avoid the majority of fire and have them pick off the escort ships furthest out. Going after the Yamato with Hellfires wasn't going to do anything, but removing almost all enemy ships before having the ships with all their missile begin picking targets would have likely been more effective.

  • @noalear
    @noalear ปีที่แล้ว +59

    It'd be interesting to see what they'd do with good AI, coordination, and realistic damage (crew death, flooding, fires, ammo going off, etc.) I'm sure the Hellfires would devastate smaller ships in a hit or two, not 60-80 hits.

    • @Michael-cf9cj
      @Michael-cf9cj ปีที่แล้ว +4

      A hellfire is an anti-tank missile. It wouldn't be particularly effective against a far, far larger warship ... and a smaller warship is far larger than a tank.

    • @Alxnick
      @Alxnick 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      ​@@Michael-cf9cjThat's kind of the thing though. A more realistic damage model that can more adequately simulate the effects of a missile impact changes everything. You don't need to jab a bunch of holes in the armor below the waterline to do it. Even a lighter weapon has the ability to do the type of secondary effects that change the outcome. You can't model the confusion of the bridge getting shredded, electrical power cutting out from shock damage, second or third missiles killing damage control teams, and so on.
      The carriers have similar problems. You're not Hellfiring the ship apart, but you almost certainly can knock it out of action with 3 to 5 hits. The deck might be armored, but the elevators aren't. They're magical portals to the soft, explody insides. Even if you can't bulleyes the hangar, they're fragile moving objects that you can damage enough to keep out of action. Plus you can hit what aircraft are on the flight deck and let secondary explosions help out. A relatively light and small attack can do outsized damage, if you do the damage right.

    • @larrswomback5823
      @larrswomback5823 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      what navy uses Hellfires????

    • @noalear
      @noalear 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @larrswomback5823 the US navy.

    • @noalear
      @noalear 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I should add, in surface-to-ship capacity.

  • @texasknight5175
    @texasknight5175 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Glad to hear Grumptastic's voice!

  • @nigeldepledge3790
    @nigeldepledge3790 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    That was a very large amount of boom-boom! Thank you, Cap and the gang!
    It turns out that Yamato's anti-air weapons are pretty good at taking down small numbers of helicopters that got within range, aren't they?
    I agree with Cap about that naval gun on the Type 45! That sounded like about 2 rounds a second! Most impressive.
    Cap - yes, the sticky-out bits near the top of the battleship's superstructure are indeed part of the primary range-finder. There would have been at least a dozen range-finders, of various sizes, on board a WWII battleship.

    • @57thorns
      @57thorns ปีที่แล้ว

      And none of them wold be operational after the first two missile hits.

  • @matthewellisor5835
    @matthewellisor5835 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Anxiously awaiting introduction of the new officer cadet. (OPSEC, understandable) either way, congratulations and prayers for health and quick recovery for all involved.
    The Things, One and Two, are the second and third best happenings of my life; My own birth, other than predication of the superior three occasions for celebration, ranks a distant fourth.

  • @jmtpolitico80
    @jmtpolitico80 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Hope all is well SUPER CAP! I hope family life is good for you, it certainly changed my life! Thanks for the hard work prior so we had something to watch. I was watching a older video of the U.K. - U.S. vs Chinese - Russia 2025. One of your best video's...

  • @willwozniak2826
    @willwozniak2826 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I cameback a few times and rewatched this....this is on my top ten list of your videos off this channel....such an interesting battle and the Japanese kept coming.....OUTSTANDING!

  • @fredericlepeltier3435
    @fredericlepeltier3435 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    FYI: according to the IJN order of battle at Midway:
    The carrier strike force (Adml Nagumo) had: 4CV, 2 BB, 6CL/CA and 9 DD.
    The "main body" or 1st fleet main force (Adml Yamamoto, 100-200Nm behind the carrier strike force) had: 3BB (including the Yamato), 5 cruisers, 8DD and one light carrier.
    These two fleet did not sail nor fought together.
    source en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Midway_order_of_battle
    The occupation fleets came from the SW and did not participate.
    That might modify the result a bit.

    • @Gearshoot
      @Gearshoot ปีที่แล้ว

      Could you cite a source other than wiki? I believe you, but there are others that are going to bully you for it.

    • @fredericlepeltier3435
      @fredericlepeltier3435 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@Gearshoot All other sources i have are Historical publications and old books including the one from Fuchida, the Kaga CAG.
      Also the Battle of midway did not end with the sinking of the carriers but lasted a fews more days when the us carriers ran out of planes for the pursuit of the retreating IJN fleet and came too close to Wake island for comfort.

    • @jpgcne
      @jpgcne ปีที่แล้ว +3

      ​@Gearshoot1350 cite a source??? Take a history course lol. Not like this is a mystery

    • @CarterBartram
      @CarterBartram ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@Gearshoot Shattered Sword (2005, by John Parshall and Anthony Tully) remains the definitive western account of the battle from the perspective of the Japanese. Their bibliography has all the primary sources, both American and Japanese, that you could ever hope for. It also debunks a lot of previous western accounts that were based on biased or unreliable sources (like Fuchida Mitsuo) and it corroborates the Wikipedia article referenced above.

    • @Wyomingchief
      @Wyomingchief ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Carter Bartram I came here to the comments to make sure that someone had referenced that book, shattered sword, is literally the best book I've ever read that concerned a naval battle during WWII. There's some good ones on the Battle of Leyte Gulf and such but none are at the level of detail that shattered sword.

  • @nataliefaust7959
    @nataliefaust7959 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I don't know what it is about being called a "valued viewer", but I have the same reaction to hearing it that I do to Bob Ross welcoming me to watch his show. ♥

  • @DrDezaro
    @DrDezaro ปีที่แล้ว +5

    A heap of those cubbies are fire directors and the large stereoscopic sight is for the main guns and the central part is where the fire control and calculations happens while the deck below is where the fight directors sight the fall of shot. The bridge is the lower one that you said was the bridge the first time.

  • @RobRoss
    @RobRoss ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I’m so happy for this video! I watched the previous one, and I commented that I thought you should do it again with one more cruiser. But you added 2 more than what I hoped you would. Good on you!

    • @sonnybowman
      @sonnybowman ปีที่แล้ว

      Someone had mentioned that that battle should take place at night, again with one cruiser and I heartily agree.

  • @acidtalons
    @acidtalons ปีที่แล้ว +18

    This really needs helicopter deployed torpedos. Mk 56 would really change the math on helicopters. Also I think the ships would have torpedos also.

    • @me67galaxylife
      @me67galaxylife 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      it's anti-submarine...

  • @FooBarr68
    @FooBarr68 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Great video guys, welcome back Grump

  • @nova_3010
    @nova_3010 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yoooo, thanks for posting this I needed to see this was awesome!

  • @CaptainMustanG4089
    @CaptainMustanG4089 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Congratulations on the new human! Think game volume needs to be turned down a touch or all voices up, normally have trouble hearing y'all but all game volume is like Im sitting next to the real aircraft. Love the videos, hope all the best for you and your family!

  • @theaxgame
    @theaxgame ปีที่แล้ว +35

    One thing I noticed in the battle is that the Gorshkov only fired after everyone else, and only at wrecks. Was that planned or just a weird AI thing? because it launched all of it's missiles at the same range as the others but only at stuff that was already wrecked.

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Nothing planned, I just let them do whatever they wanted.

    • @tylerjones-davis6269
      @tylerjones-davis6269 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      i mean you have to make sure the enemy is dead before you can get to that new MCDonalds on the oil rig

    • @charlesparr1611
      @charlesparr1611 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      I just assumed it was typical Russian quality at work.

    • @davidjames1063
      @davidjames1063 ปีที่แล้ว

      AI screwups.

    • @davidjames1063
      @davidjames1063 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@charlesparr1611 Typical American quality you mean. F35 quality garbage.

  • @DrenoshGaming
    @DrenoshGaming ปีที่แล้ว +8

    This gives me a yearning to see which generation is the best anti ship against this Japanese fleet. Would be a hoot to watch.

  • @ShuRugal
    @ShuRugal ปีที่แล้ว +1

    tips for apache drivers shooting at ships: tell george to de-was, tell him to lase, then just fire all 16 missiles continuously.
    If the ship doesn't have effective AAA, take four pods full of M229s. Two pods full will do enough damage to sink a Tico if they all connect.

  • @tarrencesun1539
    @tarrencesun1539 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi Cap, congrats on the new baby, hopefully another dcs lover. Thanks for the banger of a video!

  • @iain-duncan
    @iain-duncan ปีที่แล้ว +3

    26:00 I read an amazing book that featured a story of Japanese Americans. One I remember was of a family living in Hawaii that, when they saw the planes overhead, flew their flag in an attempt to not get bombed. They felt betrayed, a common feeling among Japanese Americans at the time. Of course, their neighbors thought they were signaling, and had then locked up even before the internment had begun. Very sad, but I'm glad Japan is a strong American friend now.

  • @RainbowDash-vy2dn
    @RainbowDash-vy2dn ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Let's get more of Violet flying Grump around in the Apache, Violet did an amazing job with just one engine

  • @christhomas4965
    @christhomas4965 ปีที่แล้ว

    These are amazing! keep up the great work! and Congratulations on the New baby!

  • @CNC-Time-Lapse
    @CNC-Time-Lapse ปีที่แล้ว +56

    This was awesome. Watching the in cockpit views with the guns blazing were epic.

  • @paulybassman7311
    @paulybassman7311 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Love getting in from work and Supercap has uploaded another Battle . Maximum boom boom with my Bangers and mAsh 🤪🤣👍👍
    Plus Grump as well.. bonus!

  • @totalnerd5674
    @totalnerd5674 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Just a suggestion here - maybe do the battle of Pearl Harbor but with modern units:
    Have 2 Izumo class and 2 Hyuga class carriers (use Tarrawa as analog) with F-35B doing air to ground
    Have 2 Maya class destroyers (use Burke Fl III) as the battleships
    2 Atago + 4 Kongo (use core game Burke Fl IIA) as the cruisers
    As for the Americans:
    8 Burke IIIs as the objective as the battleships
    some F-35As (but not as many as the Bs) assigned to the airfields
    minimal air defense, as in 2 NASAMS launchers and some Manpads
    Japanese ships will fire Tomahawks at airfields/infrastructure, while planes will bomb ships with whatever you see fit

  • @tajjej3649
    @tajjej3649 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    When my first born was born, I lost six months of coherency. I took the night shift because I could wake up, take of my baby's needs and then fall right back asleep. At about the six month mark, I realized I was finally getting enough sleep to realize that it had been six months. Babies can be demanding and take a lot of care. My wife's first born (about 2 years old when my first born came along) was quite and easy to take care of. She said quite plainly that if my first had been her first, it was unlikely there would have been a second.

  • @julie4871
    @julie4871 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    WW2 BATTLESHIPS Where some of the Last Warships built & Designed to Receive "Heavy Damage" & still Remain Extremely Effective, in its current Combat situation. & At least enough to finished a battle & return Home for repairs. Current Modern Warships are design to Inflict as much Damage as Possible before an enemy can respond. & also intercept as much ordnance b/4 it can hit the ship. " Great Video " Love to see the What If's

  • @davidl9507
    @davidl9507 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    That was so satisfying -Thank you

  • @exidy-yt
    @exidy-yt ปีที่แล้ว +24

    These are so much more fun to watch then the campaign videos, please keep it up guys!

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Will mainly be campaign vids until I am back in action full time.

    • @exidy-yt
      @exidy-yt ปีที่แล้ว

      @@grimreapers A shame, but as a father of 2 I completely understand.

  • @furynick4541
    @furynick4541 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The Japanese Kido Butai (“Mobile Force”) was commanded by Vice Admiral Nagumo Chuichi and included 4 heavy aircraft carriers, the Akagi, Kaga, Hiryu, and Soryu. Japan also had 2 light aircraft carriers, 2 seaplane carriers, 7 battleships, 15 cruisers, 42 destroyers, and 10 submarines.

  • @thereclaimer2945
    @thereclaimer2945 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi cap, just wanted to say congratulations on your child, I hope you can get some R&R when you can and thank you for keeping us entertained here on TH-cam. Thanks again.

  • @mm3mm3
    @mm3mm3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Perfect battle with lots of BOOM BOOM 😃

  • @lewisvargrson
    @lewisvargrson ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I always do enjoy these "Countdown" style fights.

  • @latch9781
    @latch9781 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Reminds me of the book *Future Weapons*, very good. Premise is a modern coalition fleet travelling back to Midway, but everything turns quickly into a disaster

  • @bigbore4498
    @bigbore4498 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Cap, congratulations on the baby. It’s not easy being a parent. But it’s so rewarding.

  • @RichieKeane
    @RichieKeane ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Nice sim, but doesn’t type 45 have some spearfish torpedoes? Same a wildcat or mh60 with torps would be more effective than the hellfires?

    • @rowanmaguire7890
      @rowanmaguire7890 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      No spear fish are only submarine launched, you won't find any sort of heavy weight torpedo on modern surface combaton, to slow with to shorter range.

    • @LondonSteveLee
      @LondonSteveLee ปีที่แล้ว

      Nope, it only caries a handful of helicopter launched antisub torpedoes and a few light torps designed to fight patrol-sized boats. Nothing ship launched until NSM finally turns up - Harpoon was removed and given to Ukraine.

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Well I got a nice surprise coming up for you when I am back in action properly.

    • @LordElpme
      @LordElpme ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@LondonSteveLee pretty sure there was a news post a while ago about the new Wildcat version with new anti ship missiles

    • @rowanmaguire7890
      @rowanmaguire7890 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@grimreapers oh damn that'll really add a new dynamic to your videos can't wait.

  • @edwardhugus2772
    @edwardhugus2772 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    The carrier should stop launching after it's hit. 1 hit to the flight deck would stop flight operations.....it doesnt need to be 100% destroyed.

  • @goshring
    @goshring ปีที่แล้ว

    Yay. Im here right away. Hoping for this video. Congrats on the baby.

  • @PaulAngileri
    @PaulAngileri ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I love the idea of running what-ifs in the Midway scenario with modern helicopter gunships versus IJN planes.

    • @ML-dk7bf
      @ML-dk7bf ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Helicopters only downside is there top speed is much lower than the zero's. 4 Apache helicopters could completely devastate a Japanese naval group if they fought at night.

  • @TheOuterCircle
    @TheOuterCircle ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Regards the damage Yamato would cause to the warships, if Yamato expects WWII era ships, it would be firing armour piercing shells. Those shells, as per the Battle of Samar, would pass clean through the modern ships likely without detonating. They would however make a huge mess of them if they were smart enough to load high explosive shells.

    • @merafirewing6591
      @merafirewing6591 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah, those ships will make fantastic firework shows once the HE is out.

    • @danielbond9755
      @danielbond9755 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If they could hit them. At Samar, Yamato had a hit rate of only a few percent against relatively slow, unmaneuverable ships.

  • @waynesworldofsci-tech
    @waynesworldofsci-tech ปีที่แล้ว +3

    In five years GR Baby will be learning how to set up DCS scenarios. In ten years GR Baby will be running GR and Cap will be sitting in a rocking chair muttering, “We had better battles in the old days…”

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      lols yup

    • @waynesworldofsci-tech
      @waynesworldofsci-tech ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@grimreapers
      As an aside, been doing some modelling. Had to stop till bigger SSD arrives, but I’ve been playing with the code, and have some really interesting ideas. I also being totally crazy, want to add every Fleet Air Arm aircraft so we can get more sweet WW2 action.
      Specifically I want to run the Battle of Taranto, so we need Swordfish, and I’d really like to know what difference having Eagle along would have made.

  • @DragonstarFighter
    @DragonstarFighter ปีที่แล้ว +5

    My Question is, what difference would substituting a Arleigh Burke-Class Flight 3 for the Ticonderoga, and the Russian Gorshkov class with the Kirov Class, make, by really putting some ultra-hard hitting anti-ship capability in there

  • @roentgen571
    @roentgen571 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I can't see Yamato without mentally hearing, "We're off, to outer space....we're leaving, mother earth....!"

    • @jacebralor71
      @jacebralor71 ปีที่แล้ว

      Starblazers for the win

  • @Blackferret66
    @Blackferret66 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    "Could a Single Modern Cruiser Defeat the Entire Spanish Armada of 1588?"

    • @blademaster2390
      @blademaster2390 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I’d watch that lmao

    • @stevedavenport1202
      @stevedavenport1202 ปีที่แล้ว

      Not even worth watching, like stealing candy from a baby.

    • @kitmoore9969
      @kitmoore9969 ปีที่แล้ว

      I've been wondering the same thing ...
      The feeblest warship in the RN is probably the Cutlass class of patrol boat. Top speed 41 knots, 12 crew, 3x machine guns. The machine guns have an effective range of 1800m. A five-second burst will hole a galleon at the waterline and sink it.
      The Armada had 137 ships with 2477 guns between them, or 18 each.
      Total personnel 25,826, or 190 sailors / soldiers per ship.
      Assume a steady 15 knot northerly wind, and a cannon range of 200m. 5 cannon hits will either sink the Cutlass, or kill so many crew that it can no longer operate.
      The only viable tactic I can think of (and I'm open to suggestions) is for the Spanish to surround the Cutlass and broadside it.
      But since the Cutlass is way faster and WAAY more manoeuvrable it can simply circle the fleet, keep out of cannon range and pick them off at will.
      The 1588 plan was for the Armada to rendezvous in Holland with another fleet of troop ships, so the minimum ambition for the Cutlass is to secure the Dutch port. But just for fun, do the Spanish "win" if a certain number reach the UK mainland? If so, they should disperse and head for a range of sites across the south coast between Dover and Penzance. Depending on how soon they break and where the battle begins, the Cutlass may not have enough time to catch them all?

  • @timbaskett6299
    @timbaskett6299 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thank you for using my idea. That made a great video to watch after work. I wonder how it would with an LHD as a "carrier".

  • @edyoung6573
    @edyoung6573 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fantastic!! What a blast watching!!!!

  • @RossOneEyed
    @RossOneEyed 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Remember, Nagumo was in charge of the attack fleet at Midway. He would have left the scene long before this end - one of the reasons he finished the war (and himself) at Saipan.

  • @thunderch1ck3en
    @thunderch1ck3en ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Those destroyers and cruiser look like tiny little fellas compared to how massive the Yamato is. Having served on a cruiser and only really doing a few missile launches and live fire exercises with the CIWS and 5"ers, it was nice seeing it in full glory.

  • @c0ldyloxproductions324
    @c0ldyloxproductions324 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    The yamato wanted revenge for killing her carriers 😂, can we possibly see 2 1980s refit Iowa’s and 2 kirov battlecruisers vs 4 type 055

  • @PatrickCrossfire.
    @PatrickCrossfire. 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Really Cool demostration!😊

  • @kenhelmers2603
    @kenhelmers2603 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Fun stuff! Idea - swing around to get out of the smoke

  • @Plastikdoom
    @Plastikdoom ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Yeah, a modern fleet, would slaughter them…I’m willing to say to the modernized BB New Jersey as she’s gotten the most upgrades out of the Iowa’s, and a modern cruiser and DD for screening anti air and missile fire to supplement the Mew Jersey would also wipe the floor with that fleet, with no losses of their own ships.

  • @sotiredoflies
    @sotiredoflies ปีที่แล้ว +5

    If I remember correctly the Japanese had an invasion fleet to the east of midway. It would be cool to split a flotilla for all of the Japanese vessels

  • @The_Viscount
    @The_Viscount ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So, I work at a museum that talks about the experience of Japanese American Code Breakers during WWII. Before Pearl Harbor, the US Navy's Office of Naval Intelligence did an analysis on the loyalty of various ethnic groups in the United States. Japanese Americans got the highest loyalty scores out of all the groups analyzed. Even with this being the case, after the United States Declaration of War on the Empire of Japan, President Franklin D Roosevelt signed Executive Order 9066 which turned the whole West Coast into a military exclusion zone. Both immigrants who fled Japan and Americans born in the US to Japanese families were detained and shipped into what was, at the time, called internment camps.
    Today, the United Nations would define them as Concentration Camps. While these words typically bring to mind images of Nazi death camps, concentration camps are defined as any prison facility to hold people illegally who have committed no crime usually for ethnic, religious, or political reasons. Death Camps are a type of concentration camp, but not all concentration camps are death camps. Despite already being briefed by various intelligence agencies on the loyalty assessment pre-war, Roosevelt still gave that order. It's worth noting that while immigrants from Germany and Italy were also detained, Americans born to those immigrants were not. Meanwhile, not only were US Citizens of Japanese blood sent to these camps, but so were Koreans and Manchurians as both were Imperial Japanese Colonies at the time. By the end of 1943, Korean Americans would be freed from the camps, but Japanese Americans would remain confined for the duration of the war.
    Even with this treatment, thousands of Japanese Americans would fight for the United States during the war, and 98% of the Code Breakers were Japanese Americans. The victory at Midway was only possible due to the efforts of Japanese American service members as was the mission to shoot down Yamamoto. The efforts of the code breakers have been estimated to have shortened the war by as many as two full years and possibly saving millions of lives on both sides. The atomic strikes on Hiroshima and Nagasaki are commonly considered the events that ended the war, but there were other contributing military factors that wouldn't have been possible without information gained from those code breakers. The cumulative losses to Japanese military and industrial assets assisted in avoiding a full scale invasion of the Japanese home islands. In the event of a full invasion, it was expected to be a repeat of Okinawa but on a much larger scale.
    In recent years the efforts of both the Code Breakers and the 442nd Regimental Combat Team, a segregated Japanese American unit, have both been getting more recognition, for which I'm grateful. As an American of both Korean and Japanese blood, I can't help but be thankful to these people's efforts. Their actions helped secure better treatment for me.

  • @verothacamaro
    @verothacamaro ปีที่แล้ว

    This is the coolest thing I’ve seen in a while.

  • @neodecker
    @neodecker ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Have you done a "what if" the Pacific fleet was ready for the Pearl Harbor attack?

    • @davidbruner9263
      @davidbruner9263 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I would love to see that one myself. Say all American ships out to sea and ready for the attack and all personnel at battle stations waiting for the IJN to run right into their trap.

  • @chrisgrilley558
    @chrisgrilley558 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The Yamato used spotters to locate and target vessels, the entire tower was used for this. It had the biggest guns, but was not very accurate at long ranges.

    • @Deilwynna
      @Deilwynna ปีที่แล้ว +2

      was more accurate than you think at over 30km range, almost hit uss white plains (cve-66) at 32km (~20 miles or ~17 nautical miles) range, one of the straddling shells on her third salvo detonated underneath white plains, the underwater explosion shockwave damaged white plains quite a bit

  • @samuellord8576
    @samuellord8576 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you Cap, and I hope you willl get more rest! I enjoyed the last version, and predicted more success than most of the GR pilots. I'm just starting to watch this now, because I want to predict: _if_ the IJN shipborne AAA modeling is now correct, the choppers will be cut down after hellfires are exhausted.

  • @shawnjudson1179
    @shawnjudson1179 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Love how you said "since you acquired a baby"...
    congrats on the new family member Cap

  • @geekpoet7443
    @geekpoet7443 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Battle ideas for GR.
    1. Battle of Rabual, January 4th, 1942, GR defends Rabual with limited resources against the Japanese attack.
    2. April 18th, 1943, GR escorts and defends Isoroku Yamamoto as he begins his inspection tour from Rabual to Balalae Airport near Bougainville following the defeat at Guadalcanal, Feb. 9th 1943.
    Both are rather difficult but might prove to be interesting.

    • @exidy-yt
      @exidy-yt ปีที่แล้ว

      I second this. These would be insanely fun to both fly and watch.

  • @cickeith9579
    @cickeith9579 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I thought the modern 5 inch guns where super penetrating and had pin point accuracy?

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      agree but not in game.

  • @jaybravo2199
    @jaybravo2199 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    "Hello valued viewers..." the calming voice I need in my life.

  • @Tryst1982
    @Tryst1982 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Congrats on the newly made person!!

  • @ryanerickson8138
    @ryanerickson8138 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I think Penguins would’ve saved the day… on a few more helicopters lol

  • @xeru9865
    @xeru9865 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    I know it would be a massacre but I would love to see a modern carrier fleet (with submarines of course) vs 2 or 3 times the forces at midway

    • @57thorns
      @57thorns ปีที่แล้ว +9

      A single modern sub with modern torpedoes would be enough, there is nothing they targets can do about it.

    • @Blox117
      @Blox117 ปีที่แล้ว

      the americans would be massacred

    • @jameshead9119
      @jameshead9119 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think he did a couple of times already with same problem of ammo shortage biting him the butt

    • @ReveredDead
      @ReveredDead ปีที่แล้ว

      It's quite simple. The carriers would launch strike jets with anti-ship missiles and would strike the Japanese ships from above the cloud layer. The Japanese wouldn't even know what was happening. Only that their ships were out of nowhere exploding and going up in flames. There wouldn't be a surface battle. The modern American carriers could be miles out of range of Japanese planes and would simple massacre the Japanese fleet of 3x the size of it's real life version. The munitions, fuel and material supply on a modern American carrier is to put it lightly. Plentiful.

    • @jameshead9119
      @jameshead9119 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ReveredDead in RL yes but I game as in this game targeting proved almost impossible as well as rearming the aircraft after the first strike ( as in this game the out come would have been far different if the ships had a supply ship added so they could of reloaded for a second barrage of missiles )

  • @benbrown7708
    @benbrown7708 ปีที่แล้ว

    Congratz on the new addition to the Cap family!

  • @44lucas
    @44lucas ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey Cap, happy to hear your voice is back to normal!

  • @andy84denham
    @andy84denham ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I never did understand why the Apache’s didn’t have the stinger missile compliment they can actually carry in real life. It would make air to air a lot easier. Even fully loaded with rockets/hellfires they can still carry 4 pillion tipped stingers. Must be a limitation of the game model

    • @Wolfe351
      @Wolfe351 ปีที่แล้ว

      I don't think Stinger is available yet for the 64

  • @svenskdod
    @svenskdod ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The arleigh burke runs on jet fuel, that way refueling ships for a fleet only need to carry one fuel type, I believe. Could be wrong.

    • @override367
      @override367 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The US likes to run literally everything on the same fuel if possible, there are a lot of things that use that particular jet fuel

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      thx

  • @_.Glennicus._
    @_.Glennicus._ ปีที่แล้ว +2

    (I'm speaking in realistic terms, if this scenario were to happen IRL)
    What's funny is, the modern ships hitting the destroyers and cruisers first is actually eliminating a torpedo threat, so I actually see why the AI chose to end them first
    The carriers aircraft can be shot down by CIWS, and considering the type of ships there, they won't screw with the battleships with missiles, as their unlikely to compromise the hull armor
    HOWEVER, there's one thing the modern ships can do, if they have modern torpedoes on any of them, they can torpedo the battleships, and be done with them

  • @chrisstiff4734
    @chrisstiff4734 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I just stumbled upon your channel and I'm blown away.....

  • @haytorrock3312
    @haytorrock3312 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Next itld like a fleet of pheonician galleys verses the parl harbour attack force.

  • @domstorey5146
    @domstorey5146 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Congrats on the recent baby acquisition cap!

  • @kkxlay
    @kkxlay ปีที่แล้ว

    Ngl, seeing all of those missiles launch at the same time would be absolutely terrifying, then and now.

  • @machinagamer
    @machinagamer ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Announces birth of a child "Acquired one times baby" 🤣🤣🤣 Congratulations!

  • @numbersletters3886
    @numbersletters3886 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    How about 4 Kirov class against them?

  • @Dirtyharry70585
    @Dirtyharry70585 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Unload on the carriers first, don’t let the planes off the decks

    • @traveler8052
      @traveler8052 ปีที่แล้ว

      chinese 055 can do that

  • @RobbyReyes1979
    @RobbyReyes1979 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    21:00 that was sick

  • @danieljones7843
    @danieljones7843 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    32:57 you are absolutely right, those are the stereoscopic rangefinders. Those, the antennas and the big cylindrical structure that they are attached to sitting on top of the main bridge (there is a lower and upper main/admirals bridge that you were pointing out just prior to my time stamp) is the main DCT (direction control tower). The tower just behind the funnel has an aft DCT sitting on top for the rear guns in case the main dct is knocked out. If that is knocked out then all guns are then under local control. There is a third stereoscopic rangefinder facing forwards that you later pointed out which are for the forward facing guns. The main DCT sitting on top of the pagoda rotates as well. I’m pretty sure the aft one rotates as well and the forward facing one set lower I’m pretty sure is fixed.

    • @danieljones7843
      @danieljones7843 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      36:51 I don’t know how the Japanese labelled their turrets but the Americans just numbered theirs, the Germans did theirs alphabetically and actually named them as well (Anton, Bruno,Caesar and Dora) and the British has A B for the forward turrets and X Y for the rear with P Q R if there were any turrets amidships (in the middle) although weirdly Nelson and Rodney’s third turrets in the C position are referred to as X turrets because they can’t face forward.