I think i will say this, in terms of good faith for me some dcau decisions rubbed me the wrong one. I think other dc animated cartoons did, a little bit better loved your video man hope you have a good week.
Because saying that the DCAU is what DCEU should have been is somehow more toxic than Snyder fans telling people to off themselves? Sorry buddy but Snydercultisit still hold the cake to the toxic Dc fandom. Also what’s the problem with Diana having feelings for Bruce?!?! Also the whole BabsXBruce thing isn’t canon or got retcon because that comic along with Batman & Harley Quinn are the only bad things about that universe.
Truth be told, I truly enjoyed the video above. The only thing I didn't like about it, was how short it was. In comparison to the other videos Sodim did (which were around 20 minutes give or take), the video above was only about seven minutes. Plus, though many good points were brought up in the video above, I did feel like more good points could have been mentioned in it as well. For example, so many people think that the voice acters for the Bruce Timm shows are the only true voices for said characters. The most famous example, being Keven Conroy. Even before the death of Keven, the 90's Batman cartoon fanatics would attack anyone like mad dogs if they didn't say he was the definitive voice for Batman. Not even dislike the voice mind you. Plus, heaven help anyone if they actually hate his performance. Which despite what the fanatics would tell you, those people do in fact exist. I've seen them now and again, however most of them get quickly bullies or silenced before too long. P.S. As an honorable mention, I have a collection of aggressive fanatics that I feel should be mentioned. A lot of the same things you've called out these other collectives for doing, are also practiced religiously by the fanatics of the Peter Jackson's "Lord of the Rings" films. When it comes to bad behavior and trying to police their opinions as law, look no farther than that bad bunch. I would list examples, but because there are so many examples, I wouldn't even know where to begin.
I'll admit I didn't mention enough, and I agree with what you said about some other points you mentioned, especially as someone who had ended blocking someone for attacking me for not holding the DCAU up in the highest regard, claiming I must've "missed the mature themes or deeper storytelling". You can probably see why I blocked that guy.
@@sodium285 Well, I'm glad we agree on this. I truly don't want to be rude, however I felt like you dropped the ball with this video in comparison to its three twins. It's not a bad video, but there is a lot of uncovered ground here. Now I have a feeling (based off of the exact wording you used in the video above) that you eventually plan to combine them all into one long video, so I almost can understand why you left out some of this information. To your credit, maybe you just felt like you would be repeating yourself too much. However again, as a solo video it feels empty and unfair in comparison to its predecessors. It feels less thorough and more could have been said without repeating yourself as well. I normally wouldn't recommend this, however do you think you could make a part two or a remake of the video above? I don't want this one to be deleted, however I feel like there are too many holes in this one. All in all, it just feels unfinished.
@@TheLoginProductions Yeah, admittedly, the original plan was to have all 6 parts as a single video, but then I had realised I'd be confusing the algorithm, so I edited it down into parts. I still think I'll release the Uncut Version of this series, and I might do a follow-up to this video called "The DCAU is NOT the Be-All-End-All of DC", but I'll see. So, yes. I'm taking your advice into consideration.
Just for clarification, are you talking about "The Batman" T.V. Cartoon, or "The Batman" live action film. I ask because they both have the same name, which makes talks about ether confusing. P.S. Also, saying something is "comic accurate" is a bit of a vague statement. The reason why, is because there've been more then thousands of comics with just as many different "spins" on these characters. So because of that, I have two questions. Comic accurate to what? What exact Batman comics are you referring to in this instance?
@@sodium285 For the record, I wasn't confused as to which one you meant. Through pictures in the video above, I kind of figured you meant the film. However, I wasn't positive which one the other fellow was referring to. I figured it was the film as well, however I wasn't positive. If only they had different names, that way clarification wouldn't be needed. Funny enough, even though I actually wrote my first statement as a response to the other fellow, it looks to have glitched and didn't direct it to him. Oh well, at least it posted at all. Plus, I am glad you clarified as well. Even though I knew what you meant, it's always better to be safe rather than sorry.
I think i will say this, in terms of good faith for me some dcau decisions rubbed me the wrong one.
I think other dc animated cartoons did, a little bit better loved your video man hope you have a good week.
@@demon_warrior870 Thanks for watching the video. Glad you enjoyed it. 😉
Because saying that the DCAU is what DCEU should have been is somehow more toxic than Snyder fans telling people to off themselves? Sorry buddy but Snydercultisit still hold the cake to the toxic Dc fandom. Also what’s the problem with Diana having feelings for Bruce?!?! Also the whole BabsXBruce thing isn’t canon or got retcon because that comic along with Batman & Harley Quinn are the only bad things about that universe.
Truth be told, I truly enjoyed the video above. The only thing I didn't like about it, was how short it was. In comparison to the other videos Sodim did (which were around 20 minutes give or take), the video above was only about seven minutes. Plus, though many good points were brought up in the video above, I did feel like more good points could have been mentioned in it as well. For example, so many people think that the voice acters for the Bruce Timm shows are the only true voices for said characters. The most famous example, being Keven Conroy. Even before the death of Keven, the 90's Batman cartoon fanatics would attack anyone like mad dogs if they didn't say he was the definitive voice for Batman. Not even dislike the voice mind you. Plus, heaven help anyone if they actually hate his performance. Which despite what the fanatics would tell you, those people do in fact exist. I've seen them now and again, however most of them get quickly bullies or silenced before too long.
P.S.
As an honorable mention, I have a collection of aggressive fanatics that I feel should be mentioned. A lot of the same things you've called out these other collectives for doing, are also practiced religiously by the fanatics of the Peter Jackson's "Lord of the Rings" films. When it comes to bad behavior and trying to police their opinions as law, look no farther than that bad bunch. I would list examples, but because there are so many examples, I wouldn't even know where to begin.
I'll admit I didn't mention enough, and I agree with what you said about some other points you mentioned, especially as someone who had ended blocking someone for attacking me for not holding the DCAU up in the highest regard, claiming I must've "missed the mature themes or deeper storytelling". You can probably see why I blocked that guy.
@@sodium285 Well, I'm glad we agree on this. I truly don't want to be rude, however I felt like you dropped the ball with this video in comparison to its three twins. It's not a bad video, but there is a lot of uncovered ground here. Now I have a feeling (based off of the exact wording you used in the video above) that you eventually plan to combine them all into one long video, so I almost can understand why you left out some of this information. To your credit, maybe you just felt like you would be repeating yourself too much. However again, as a solo video it feels empty and unfair in comparison to its predecessors. It feels less thorough and more could have been said without repeating yourself as well. I normally wouldn't recommend this, however do you think you could make a part two or a remake of the video above? I don't want this one to be deleted, however I feel like there are too many holes in this one. All in all, it just feels unfinished.
@@TheLoginProductions Yeah, admittedly, the original plan was to have all 6 parts as a single video, but then I had realised I'd be confusing the algorithm, so I edited it down into parts. I still think I'll release the Uncut Version of this series, and I might do a follow-up to this video called "The DCAU is NOT the Be-All-End-All of DC", but I'll see. So, yes. I'm taking your advice into consideration.
Bros really saying the best adaptation of Dc has the worst fanbase?!?! 🤣
you're on part 6 and you still haven't talked about dragonball fandom?
@@senzanome9824 I really focused on fandoms of franchise I love/have great knowledge of. Dragonball isn't exactly one of them.
Nah I’d disagree The Batman was the most comic accurate Batman out of all adaptations
Maybe I worded it badly. I guess I meant The Batman was unique compared to most adaptations outside of the comics.
Just for clarification, are you talking about "The Batman" T.V. Cartoon, or "The Batman" live action film. I ask because they both have the same name, which makes talks about ether confusing.
P.S.
Also, saying something is "comic accurate" is a bit of a vague statement. The reason why, is because there've been more then thousands of comics with just as many different "spins" on these characters. So because of that, I have two questions. Comic accurate to what? What exact Batman comics are you referring to in this instance?
@@TheLoginProductions I was referring to the Live action movie.
@@sodium285 For the record, I wasn't confused as to which one you meant. Through pictures in the video above, I kind of figured you meant the film. However, I wasn't positive which one the other fellow was referring to. I figured it was the film as well, however I wasn't positive. If only they had different names, that way clarification wouldn't be needed.
Funny enough, even though I actually wrote my first statement as a response to the other fellow, it looks to have glitched and didn't direct it to him. Oh well, at least it posted at all. Plus, I am glad you clarified as well. Even though I knew what you meant, it's always better to be safe rather than sorry.