I have met a lot of people like that, and they were on the spectrum. They won't look you in the eye, and have that nervous blink. I am not talking about the condescending pertentious attitude like a Reddit mod. Just talking about the mannerism. Many on the spectrum are good people if just socially awkward. I don't know who that guy is. He reminds me of DnD players. Or people who go to a Renaissance fair.
That's Slappable Jerk, these were all characters of his! His videos are really good, I suggest checking them out. The first defendant was "Average Redditor", and he's a fan favourite.
It used to be a sign of respect to be clean and well dressed to go to court. If your doctor showed up in flip flops or you held a nice dinner and ppl showed up with hoodies and flip flops, you might feel disrespected and not act favorable to them.
No, that's the 30-year-old with an 18-year-old girlfriend (or, at least he was, now he's the 30-year-old SoundCloud rapper). His name is Brian, and he's part of the SJCU (Slappable Jerk Cinematic Universe). The other characters are also from the SJCU, Wyatt the Average Redditor and Elliott the "nice guy" (soon to be the manipulative ex-husband who cheated)
@@Lo-Sir he is quoting a funny part of the video in the comment section in order to show how he found it funny. therefore, it isnt necissary to down him for such an act.
@@Aperson-rs4ehnecessary* Not trying to down your whole argument for one spelling error (even though I think the comments where they just quote the video are unnecessary and annoying), I just wanted to tell you this for future reference
Not everyone can make and maintain eye contact. For example, autistic people. If eye contact or the wrong clothing influences the judgment, there is something wrong with the legal system.
I do find it weird and kinda corrupt that the court is less likely to rule in your favor simply because of what you're wearing. Some people can only afford hoodies from thrift shops, and flip flops which you can buy at dollar tree. Courts are super classist and messed up if you think about it.
it makes sense, but also at least in usa courts are zero percent funded by government funding//taxes and 100 percent funded by fines and paperwork fees-- its kinda fucked from the get go that way lol
As a Norwegian lay judge, I can say with 100% certainty that if any judge over here so much as commented on someone's apparel, the whole case might be thrown out...
One better even Marilyn Manson wore a suit to court and then a reporter had the nerve to call it a costume implying I guess that Marilyn Manson looks weird even in a suit and tie 🙄
Even Mark Zuckerberg wore a suit to testify before Congress, but of course Congressman John “Lurch” Fetterman can’t be bothered to wear one to work. 🤦♂️
The movie "Gaslight" came out 80 years ago in 1944. So a 90 year old would be more familiar with the origins of the phrase than a young person. Most young people aren't familiar with the plot points of the movie to understand the meaning of gaslighting. Homes were light by gas. The new husband would turn up and down the gas light to make his wife think that she was crazy.
That bothered me too. I love that movie and it annoys me when people use the term "gaslighting" to mean "lying". Since it's a very specific type of habitual lying.
@@phillawrence5148It was way more complicated than that. The husband was specifically trying to make the wife look crazy, and one of the things he was doing was causing the lamps to flicker, but every time she asked him about it he denied that they were flickering at all. Basically told her she was hallucinating when he had caused the things she saw.
I've usually left work to go to court the few times I've gone. All for traffic violations but wearing my work cloths didn't effect my judgement usually found in my favor
But wearing cut off shorts, flip flops, and a wife beater could be distracting. A pair of pants that isn't Denim, a dark colored pair of shoes that don't look like they were used to mow the lawn all summer, and a shirt that has a collar will usually suffice. These clothes should also be free of holes, stains, and wrinkles.
@@D1i1s1 no matter what one wears, it was purchased. I've been homeless. I've never not owned a pair of chinos and a shirt with a collar. Heck, I owned a jacket and various ties while I was homeless. And not wearing such things doesn't make one automatically guilty. But the people I've met who don't own at least decent clothing are also going to ball games and concerts. It's not that they can't afford decent clothes. They don't want them.
@D1i1s1 No one except the homeless are too poor for what's described, and intends a criminal case the Public Defender's Office will lend appropriate attire for court in such situations. You are a redditor.
flip flops or jandels as they are called down here in NZ would be perfectly fine and if anything wanted to be worn in court because down here its just an everyday item of clothing no matter the weather
@@raptorboi5355in what way is judging appearance not corrupt that’s literally classist you can’t judge on anything but the facts of the case if you don’t you are corrupt
1. last time I checked cloths do not count as speech and therefore wearing a BDSM outfit to court is not a right protected by the first amendment 2. Is it really that fucking hard to follow basic dress code standards? Suits can be pretty fucking cheap and if somehow you can't spare 60 dollars for a good suit that will last a good while I think you have other issues going on than a court case.
My lawyer actually told me to dress down a bit in my divorce hearings. She said I looked like a criminal defendant. Apparently a jacket and tie are overdressed anymore.
Look wealthy, pay more. Look trashy, lose respect. Look flashy, distract from your testimony as everyone subconsciously critiques your attire. Look like a slob, lose respectability. Common sence, really.
Courtroom decorum is ridiculously antiquated and arbitrary meant mostly to convey the sense of authority and intimidationnfor the supposed seriousness of your offences, which is pretty ridiculous when it's for something like a traffic ticket.
@@indecisitivity1832 Because it's the judge's actual JOB to weigh the facts against the law, not to dictate fashion. A judge's idea of what is "serious" clothing is subjective and should have ZERO bearing on the outcome of judicial process in a non-corrupt system. Yet you and so many other people are all like, "nah, it's fine to punish people for having bad taste in clothing or being too poor to afford fancy clothes, that's just how the world works!" as if that doesn't inherently undermine the _entire purpose_ of having a judicial.
@@michealholden2888first off it ain't that expensive and second off your court case is not immediate it's in advance so you had plenty of time to get one
In all honesty clothing should never have any baring in court.. courts are suppose to be impartial and fair. Courts are for people of all walks of life, both rich and poor. So judges and the courts need to hold them selves to a higher standard if someone’s dress bothers them. Only exception is clothing that may pose a safety issue or distracting (ie neon, lights, glowy, noisy, etc), but simply put any normal clothing should never be disallowed nor frowned upon.
Justice shouldn’t be dependent on your wardrobe. This is an incredibly archaic and classist system meant to suppress the lower and middle class who often don’t even own suits
True. but this notion neglects cheaper ways of acquiring a suit. you can loan a suit for a day. You also would likely be fine with a formal shirt and pants. I do still however agree with you it is inherently classist to require formal wear to court
It’s not really about that. It’s about looking presentable and respectable. These courts see the worst trash of humanity on the daily. Real bottom rung of society people. If you make the effort to look like an upstanding citizen, you’ll look extra good in comparison and you’ll likely get better outcomes. If you look like the type of person who would commit the same crime again, they’ll be less lenient. You don’t have to wear a suit, just wear what you would if you had to go into an office to work.
@@Zei33You just restated why it's classist. Failing to look respectable by the court's definition makes you more likely to be seen unfavourably. Whether it's a good idea to comply, or even whether it's easy, doesn't make it right.
Yes your honor I did just come from work. I work night shift. By the time I made it home. Showered. And showed up back here. It would be around 3:00 in the afternoon. Because I don't live anywhere close. To the courthouse. So yes I left from work. I came here. So that I wouldn't miss Court.
I think it's really stupid how our society just got completely stuck on an arbitrary piece of fashion from like 150 years ago, and decided this is the always and forever only acceptable outfit for work or any formal matter forever now. Originally people wore suits because they were comfortable and practical for the needs of the time. Now they really aren't either of those things, its just a completely classist thing that some old people insisted on at some point and then it became standard. Showing up to court in a suit is no different than showing up in a nobleman's attire from the renaissance. Both are outdated and impractical outfits designed for a different era. Despite that you're still expected to wear a suit
@@slkjvlkfsvnlsdfhgdght5447 Its called "the court doesnt deserve unwaving respect." They are public servants not members of authortity and even if they WERE its 100% profiling. You realise "comtempt of court" just means "we can arrest you for any reason we see fit once you step in here." Judge doesnt like your tone? Contempt of court, boom. 30 days in jail. Doesnt like your outfit? Boom, 30 days in jail. Using african american vernacular? Boom, 60 days in jail.
You don’t LOSE a case from not having money. You cannot post BOND if you have no money. (Which is actually changing now that PR bonds are a thing). Second. It’s not about having “no good clothes”, it’s about dressing decently. Which is not expensive. You don’t need a $200 suit. Ross, goodwill and Walmart exist. Just dress like proper men and women. That shouldn’t be a hard task for adults. I work in the Courts everyday. Modern day ppl are just tasteless and lazy. It’s disappointing. But the bond-out system is changing. That was one thing I thought wasn’t fair to indigent people. (Bonds are typically ordered according to the level of crime and the financial status of the defendant. A person that’s poor wouldn’t get a thousand dollars bond for a petty crime).
@@hoagieimpact9189 Please please please study our judicial system. You don’t know everything, and the stuff you see in media isn’t good enough People like you piss me off. Before you complain about the government, RESEARCH IT so you can complain about the RIGHT THINGS
funny enough the term gaslighting comes from a title of a movie which is probably over 80 years old. and the term is actually became quite popular recently
funny how the judicial system is supposed to be completely "fair" and "unbiased" when something as irrelivant as what your wearing can affect whether youre determined guilty or innocent
Also wear light colors like sky blue or white and tan. Because of culture and perceptions most judges will see black clothing as something a criminal or guilty person wears. I know it sounds stupid but judges are not robots judging facts and evidence only they have perceptions just like anyone else. In a court room perception is very important even found guilty it could mean a lesser punishment.
While unfair, wouldn't it sway it to your side? Like lawyers would play up your disadvantaged to get them to empathize with you. But for this case not taking your case seriously and being antagonistic to anyone would be pretty stupid
The American court system is truly terrifying! Is this really what a judge considers? - The way I dress - How I speak - My eloquence - My capacity to ingratiate Do these factors assure innocence, while wearing flip-flops ensures guilt? To be quite honest, that seems more like a kangaroo court than actual justice.
My Uncle lost a court case where the other person had literally no solid evidence and he had things to prove that what she was saying was false because him and his wife were "too emotional"
You lose the court case quickly because you aren't serious about the case, aka not getting properly dressed. They consider it because it's basic respect, getting dressed properly is just being respectful. Same with how you talk. Flip flops don't ensure guilt, it's just not being respectful especially when everyone there is properly dressed and you aren't.
Interesting, the defendants are all incredibly good looking. Is this really a court proceeding or is this a handsome contest? 🤔
I dunno, they all sound like peole straight outta ace attorney though
It appears the entirety of this court favors the visually esthetic. What unprofessional bogus.
Lmao u got pinned
You pull off being an asshole too well bro haha
Love ur vids
This is the best collab ever. This guy has the best characters and law by mike is informative
Wear a Swimsuit 😂
It helps the other guy is actually a lawyer too!!!
@@KekeeBlack thats insane, i had no clue. Ive always loved his 30 year old dating a 18 year old character. Too accurate!
the guy who plays the redditor character is so unfunny
@@sentryslmaoaverage redditor spotted
That first impression actually fucked me up because i know people that in that exact fashion, exact same everything, would reply like that
Called “the redditor” lmao he plays the personality really well
Omg I have a friend exactly like that
I have met a lot of people like that, and they were on the spectrum. They won't look you in the eye, and have that nervous blink.
I am not talking about the condescending pertentious attitude like a Reddit mod.
Just talking about the mannerism. Many on the spectrum are good people if just socially awkward.
I don't know who that guy is. He reminds me of DnD players. Or people who go to a Renaissance fair.
State of justice is pretty pathetic if clothes,shoes or aesthetic nonsense is given importance instead of justice.
That's Slappable Jerk, these were all characters of his! His videos are really good, I suggest checking them out. The first defendant was "Average Redditor", and he's a fan favourite.
The perfect collab has been made
Who’s the other dude?
@@LuckyCharms777 Theslappablejerk, the character he is playing is 'Average reddit user' !
@@NicoandIndy
Cool, thanks.
Came here to say it. They're perfect for each other. The TH-cam comedy duo we didn't know we needed.
They did another collab where it was redditor vs cop.
Pro tip:
You can't wear bad clothes, if you don't wear any clothes.
😅😅
Judge POV
A: That is public indecency
B: Who let him in the court like this? Because they are obviously not doing their job.
For any other crime sure but for indecent exposure is apparently a problem if I'm naked in court
😂
@@adrianwoodruff1885corruption at its finest
1st flip flop dude sounded like he was about to SNAP
Gotta love a Redditor in court.
He does have a point though
@@Lila_UrarakaYT They weren't walking around with their toes out, them mf's at least fought in socks.
@@TheLuuman thank you captain obvious. I did deep research into the samurai in high school world history
@@Lila_UrarakaYT so? you sure didn't use what you learned in your first comment.
@@Yusuf-ke5iuit's a confused man in a dress. It's not going to understand.
Dude really said "Eedo Period" 💀
Not to mention he’s wearing the wrong shoes lmao
Bro is wearing flip flops not settas💀
LMFAOO
Hes actually not wrong the edo period is a thing and you can search it up
@@0-0-91-x8jit’s the way he pronounced it
It's amazing how justice depends on the judge liking you, not on the actual system.
Back to the corrupt court comment with the flip flops.
It used to be a sign of respect to be clean and well dressed to go to court.
If your doctor showed up in flip flops or you held a nice dinner and ppl showed up with hoodies and flip flops, you might feel disrespected and not act favorable to them.
Well im not the doctor, just like im not the judge. Im a normal person without excessive expectations put on me. @@mojo7493
And THAT'S why we always demand a jury trial. If it's not a serious crime the state will often throw your case out.
@@mojo7493Only a pssy would be upset by something like that
The first reddotor was a jumpscare for me😂
"i gotta pick up my girlfriend from high school... Once she's done grading her student's essays"
No, that's the 30-year-old with an 18-year-old girlfriend (or, at least he was, now he's the 30-year-old SoundCloud rapper). His name is Brian, and he's part of the SJCU (Slappable Jerk Cinematic Universe). The other characters are also from the SJCU, Wyatt the Average Redditor and Elliott the "nice guy" (soon to be the manipulative ex-husband who cheated)
@@ptolemyhenson6838 yes, i know who the guy is. I was making a joke
I remember reading a story like that on r/HolUp
@@Chris_winthersmfers cannot comprehend humor 💀
@@unoriginalname3442 You can't blame a Redditor for finding his way in here, some people enjoy seeing parodies of themselves.
I wasn't expecting this collaboration but I love it
-"I've got to pick up my girlfriend from highschool"
-"That's exactly why we are here"
💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀
I think we heard
@@Lo-Sir he is quoting a funny part of the video in the comment section in order to show how he found it funny. therefore, it isnt necissary to down him for such an act.
@@Aperson-rs4ehnecessary*
Not trying to down your whole argument for one spelling error (even though I think the comments where they just quote the video are unnecessary and annoying), I just wanted to tell you this for future reference
@@You-are-definitely-right-but thx
Never thought I’d see this tag team
He’s such a good actor he actually made me cringe. Well done
I love how he avoids eye contact at all costs
Peak reddit mod behavior
Not everyone can make and maintain eye contact. For example, autistic people. If eye contact or the wrong clothing influences the judgment, there is something wrong with the legal system.
@@gerdwollanck5990Anyone with a brain can assume that this isn’t the case in this specific video. C’mon, man! Use logical reasoning!
the collab we didn't know we needed
LMAO
@@ananas-nevermind What country is that flag?
@@CGJUGO80oh you sweet summer child
@@CGJUGO80 Normandy
@@CGJUGO80ill spoil it: its a flag from lgbtq community
The first guy made some excellent points. 😂
Mike being canon to the Slappaverse is the best thing to have ever happened to me
he appeared on his channel as well as elliot (as manipulative husband) divorce lawyer
@@flop-00 Yeah, I saw that video, it was really funny.
Only wear good looking clothes because as he said it's a corrupted court, it won't judge you off your poofs of your innocence
“If they were good enough for japans greatest warriors then they should hold up in your corrupted court “
That one got me bad 😂😂😂😂😂😂
Well he isn't wrong about it being a corrupted court. The whole system is.
And never look the judge in the eye at all
😂 made me laugh each time he said it as this plays on repeat 🤣
Lmao. He said that shid smiling the whole time. He would never in real life. Judge gon nail him to a cross .
I do find it weird and kinda corrupt that the court is less likely to rule in your favor simply because of what you're wearing. Some people can only afford hoodies from thrift shops, and flip flops which you can buy at dollar tree. Courts are super classist and messed up if you think about it.
Its even weirder when you realize you're being judged for what you wear everywhere you go
They’re messed up when you don’t think about too
@@KamuiCageyeah I learned not to care much; so long as I’m wearing comfortable clothes I’m chillin
Well too fucking bad go get a better job bummy mcbummer.
it makes sense, but also at least in usa courts are zero percent funded by government funding//taxes and 100 percent funded by fines and paperwork fees-- its kinda fucked from the get go that way lol
As a Norwegian lay judge, I can say with 100% certainty that if any judge over here so much as commented on someone's apparel, the whole case might be thrown out...
"Even Puff Daddy wore a suit to court."
One better even Marilyn Manson wore a suit to court and then a reporter had the nerve to call it a costume implying I guess that Marilyn Manson looks weird even in a suit and tie 🙄
He's a follower then
@@rustyshackleford6035dude is weird though
Even Mark Zuckerberg wore a suit to testify before Congress, but of course Congressman John “Lurch” Fetterman can’t be bothered to wear one to work. 🤦♂️
I'm going to small claims court next week; don't even own a suit. So it's dress slacks and a polo.
Was not expecting the reddit guy to show up lmao
The movie "Gaslight" came out 80 years ago in 1944. So a 90 year old would be more familiar with the origins of the phrase than a young person. Most young people aren't familiar with the plot points of the movie to understand the meaning of gaslighting. Homes were light by gas. The new husband would turn up and down the gas light to make his wife think that she was crazy.
Thanks for the explanation I always wondered where that term came from.
The fact that there were two gaslight movies and Hollywood tried to gaslight us that there was only one is crazy.
That bothered me too. I love that movie and it annoys me when people use the term "gaslighting" to mean "lying". Since it's a very specific type of habitual lying.
Why would that make them think they were crazy? Curious
@@phillawrence5148It was way more complicated than that. The husband was specifically trying to make the wife look crazy, and one of the things he was doing was causing the lamps to flicker, but every time she asked him about it he denied that they were flickering at all. Basically told her she was hallucinating when he had caused the things she saw.
The crossover we never asked for but absolutely needed
Best ever collab. Love it.
No idea id ever see a collab like this but eveyone needed it
The callab we didn't know we needed till we got it
the best collab ever.
The best collab we never expected.
I've usually left work to go to court the few times I've gone. All for traffic violations but wearing my work cloths didn't effect my judgement usually found in my favor
I should win my case on the merit of my proven innocence, not my willingness to conform...
Or your ability to afford fancy enough clothing
freeeeeedommm yeahhhh😂😂😂
Fr mike and reddit guy are the best collab ever
‘If they were good enough for Japan’s greatest warriors, then they should be good enough in your corrupt court.’ I can’t lmfao 😂😂
he CLOCKED the judge so fast in the first one LMAO
sure...
You sound like someone who’d vote for Kamala Harris over Dick Cheney’s endorsement
@@Jokrstarz okay...
@@vladimirrashkovsky6274 you sound like the type of person who want to fuck children
@@vladimirrashkovsky6274Wtf does politics have to do with this
You shouldn't be judged by what you wear, you should be judged by what you did
But wearing cut off shorts, flip flops, and a wife beater could be distracting.
A pair of pants that isn't Denim, a dark colored pair of shoes that don't look like they were used to mow the lawn all summer, and a shirt that has a collar will usually suffice. These clothes should also be free of holes, stains, and wrinkles.
@@johnclaybaugh9536 So unless you have the monetary leeway to buy that stuff you are automatically presumed guilty?
Sounds pretty corrupt to me.
@@D1i1s1 no matter what one wears, it was purchased. I've been homeless. I've never not owned a pair of chinos and a shirt with a collar. Heck, I owned a jacket and various ties while I was homeless.
And not wearing such things doesn't make one automatically guilty. But the people I've met who don't own at least decent clothing are also going to ball games and concerts. It's not that they can't afford decent clothes. They don't want them.
@D1i1s1 No one except the homeless are too poor for what's described, and intends a criminal case the Public Defender's Office will lend appropriate attire for court in such situations. You are a redditor.
@johnclaybaugh9536 no clothes are distracting, and i have fucking ADHD, so i know all about distraction,
flip flops or jandels as they are called down here in NZ would be perfectly fine and if anything wanted to be worn in court because down here its just an everyday item of clothing no matter the weather
I just can't imagine telling a judge straight to his face his court is corrupt 😂😂😂
I mean, if justice is dependent on what clothes you wear (which is protected by the First Amendment), then it _is_ corrupt.
it isn’t tho
@@Bacteriophagebsfacts it is and the court gotta follow by 1st amendment
@@raptorboi5355in what way is judging appearance not corrupt that’s literally classist you can’t judge on anything but the facts of the case if you don’t you are corrupt
1. last time I checked cloths do not count as speech and therefore wearing a BDSM outfit to court is not a right protected by the first amendment 2. Is it really that fucking hard to follow basic dress code standards? Suits can be pretty fucking cheap and if somehow you can't spare 60 dollars for a good suit that will last a good while I think you have other issues going on than a court case.
My lawyer actually told me to dress down a bit in my divorce hearings. She said I looked like a criminal defendant. Apparently a jacket and tie are overdressed anymore.
Looking more casual makes you more relatable to the jury. Although the judge might be annoyed.
Look wealthy, pay more.
Look trashy, lose respect.
Look flashy, distract from your testimony as everyone subconsciously critiques your attire.
Look like a slob, lose respectability.
Common sence, really.
This is a divorce hearing. There's gonna be money involved. Office casual with a jacket is better than looking like you have money.
Slappable jerk crossover omg
Courtroom decorum is ridiculously antiquated and arbitrary meant mostly to convey the sense of authority and intimidationnfor the supposed seriousness of your offences, which is pretty ridiculous when it's for something like a traffic ticket.
Getting offended at people wearing work clothes shows why judges shoudnt make hundreds of thousands of dollars per year.
Or lawyers.
Or police.
Number One is like my Swedish Teacher in school 💀
If my court case fails simply because of how I was dressed in court, I’m going on a rampage
Your crime is to think those shoes match those pants. 10 months in prison.
Apparently Justice isn't blind, and she's a fashion critic.
It kind of makes sense. If you don’t look like you’re taking the trial seriously, then why should the judge take you seriously?
@@indecisitivity1832 Because it's the judge's actual JOB to weigh the facts against the law, not to dictate fashion. A judge's idea of what is "serious" clothing is subjective and should have ZERO bearing on the outcome of judicial process in a non-corrupt system. Yet you and so many other people are all like, "nah, it's fine to punish people for having bad taste in clothing or being too poor to afford fancy clothes, that's just how the world works!" as if that doesn't inherently undermine the _entire purpose_ of having a judicial.
Ya a Hoodie and sneakers r serious enough for me , unless the court wanna send me a few 100 to buy a suit and shit 😂😂
@@michealholden2888just buy a cheap 10 dollar one brokie
@@michealholden2888first off it ain't that expensive and second off your court case is not immediate it's in advance so you had plenty of time to get one
first two i understand, 3rd i dont.. punishing someone because they live or work a blue collar worklife
In all honesty clothing should never have any baring in court.. courts are suppose to be impartial and fair. Courts are for people of all walks of life, both rich and poor. So judges and the courts need to hold them selves to a higher standard if someone’s dress bothers them. Only exception is clothing that may pose a safety issue or distracting (ie neon, lights, glowy, noisy, etc), but simply put any normal clothing should never be disallowed nor frowned upon.
Justice shouldn’t be dependent on your wardrobe. This is an incredibly archaic and classist system meant to suppress the lower and middle class who often don’t even own suits
True. but this notion neglects cheaper ways of acquiring a suit. you can loan a suit for a day. You also would likely be fine with a formal shirt and pants. I do still however agree with you it is inherently classist to require formal wear to court
It’s not really about that. It’s about looking presentable and respectable. These courts see the worst trash of humanity on the daily. Real bottom rung of society people. If you make the effort to look like an upstanding citizen, you’ll look extra good in comparison and you’ll likely get better outcomes. If you look like the type of person who would commit the same crime again, they’ll be less lenient.
You don’t have to wear a suit, just wear what you would if you had to go into an office to work.
No there are clothes for the right time and place
@@Zei33You just restated why it's classist. Failing to look respectable by the court's definition makes you more likely to be seen unfavourably. Whether it's a good idea to comply, or even whether it's easy, doesn't make it right.
@@alisilcox6036 unless you’re homeless, looking respectable has nothing to do with class. Not even sure you know what ‘classist’ means.
I love this guys witty comebacks
Yes your honor I did just come from work. I work night shift. By the time I made it home. Showered. And showed up back here. It would be around 3:00 in the afternoon. Because I don't live anywhere close. To the courthouse. So yes I left from work. I came here. So that I wouldn't miss Court.
I love how I’ve met all of them especially the first guy
If wearing flip flops is the difference between spending life in prison and freedom, then f- this system.
I would wear flipflops out of spite.
Exactly
I think it's really stupid how our society just got completely stuck on an arbitrary piece of fashion from like 150 years ago, and decided this is the always and forever only acceptable outfit for work or any formal matter forever now. Originally people wore suits because they were comfortable and practical for the needs of the time. Now they really aren't either of those things, its just a completely classist thing that some old people insisted on at some point and then it became standard. Showing up to court in a suit is no different than showing up in a nobleman's attire from the renaissance. Both are outdated and impractical outfits designed for a different era. Despite that you're still expected to wear a suit
Typical for them to find any "problems" that they can instead of focusing on the actual problems
Pro tip: If you wanna win a court case, don't show up dressed as Adolf Hitler.
This is a good collab 💯💯💯
Losing a court case should have NOTHING to do with what you're wearing. That's called profiling.
It's about giving a good impression!
@@InkyminkyzizwozYou just proved their point.
it's called "respecting yhe court". youre aware that "contemp of court" is also an offense, right?
@@slkjvlkfsvnlsdfhgdght5447 Its called "the court doesnt deserve unwaving respect."
They are public servants not members of authortity and even if they WERE its 100% profiling. You realise "comtempt of court" just means "we can arrest you for any reason we see fit once you step in here." Judge doesnt like your tone? Contempt of court, boom. 30 days in jail. Doesnt like your outfit? Boom, 30 days in jail. Using african american vernacular? Boom, 60 days in jail.
@@slkjvlkfsvnlsdfhgdght5447 Why should it be respected if they act like that?
"Are you gaslighting me?!"
"Dude, you're, like, 90, you don't even know what that means."
Bro roasted him in 69 languages
Where I'm from, if you pick your girlfriend from high school as an adult, you get a "thank you" from her parents, and that's pretty much it. 😊
Remember when court was about justice and not anything else?
Never happened. But yeah, point stands
@@hWat-Ever 🤓
Are you dumb
No, money is the only god and Jerome Powell is its prophet
This you ?@@squeesquaaful
Notice he didn't say you can't be nude
This is quite the collab I never saw coming 😂😂😂
have no money? lose.
have no good clothes? lose.
I personally have never seen justice in court.
you can do everything you want if you just pay up.
You don’t LOSE a case from not having money. You cannot post BOND if you have no money. (Which is actually changing now that PR bonds are a thing).
Second. It’s not about having “no good clothes”, it’s about dressing decently. Which is not expensive. You don’t need a $200 suit. Ross, goodwill and Walmart exist. Just dress like proper men and women. That shouldn’t be a hard task for adults.
I work in the Courts everyday. Modern day ppl are just tasteless and lazy. It’s disappointing.
But the bond-out system is changing. That was one thing I thought wasn’t fair to indigent people. (Bonds are typically ordered according to the level of crime and the financial status of the defendant. A person that’s poor wouldn’t get a thousand dollars bond for a petty crime).
@@hoagieimpact9189 Please please please study our judicial system.
You don’t know everything, and the stuff you see in media isn’t good enough
People like you piss me off. Before you complain about the government, RESEARCH IT so you can complain about the RIGHT THINGS
funny enough the term gaslighting comes from a title of a movie which is probably over 80 years old. and the term is actually became quite popular recently
That was the joke.
"You're like 90. You don't even know what that means."
A quiet joke, but still a joke any 90 year old would get.
How have i not seen this collab yet. Such a good use of all his characters
"Can you hurry up I have to pick up my girlfriend from high school"💀😭😭
Honestly, you SHOULD be allowed to wear what you want and have your attire not be taken into consideration regarding any court proceedings.
Bro slappable jerk was a great collaboration 😂
Bro is really making fun of the judge 😂
funny how the judicial system is supposed to be completely "fair" and "unbiased" when something as irrelivant as what your wearing can affect whether youre determined guilty or innocent
Also don’t wear any of that at the supermarket, bank, or any restaurant.
Top 10 Crossover episodes of all time
Also wear light colors like sky blue or white and tan. Because of culture and perceptions most judges will see black clothing as something a criminal or guilty person wears. I know it sounds stupid but judges are not robots judging facts and evidence only they have perceptions just like anyone else. In a court room perception is very important even found guilty it could mean a lesser punishment.
I'm stunned by this collab, could NEVER see it coming!!
So if you’re poor &/or homeless, you have absolutely no chance? Good, solid advice there …
Yeah nothing
While unfair, wouldn't it sway it to your side? Like lawyers would play up your disadvantaged to get them to empathize with you. But for this case not taking your case seriously and being antagonistic to anyone would be pretty stupid
Wyatt, Brian, Elliot, and Micheal Lawson in one video? Somebody pinch me I must be dreaming
Omg the collab I didn’t know i needed 😂😂😂
If they are good enough for a Japanese warrior then they are good enough to handle your corrupt court 😂
The American court system is truly terrifying! Is this really what a judge considers?
- The way I dress
- How I speak
- My eloquence
- My capacity to ingratiate
Do these factors assure innocence, while wearing flip-flops ensures guilt? To be quite honest, that seems more like a kangaroo court than actual justice.
My Uncle lost a court case where the other person had literally no solid evidence and he had things to prove that what she was saying was false because him and his wife were "too emotional"
@@kaziahscats I am so sorry to hear that! Wish your uncle healing and the best!
Exactly justice is supposed to be blind it’s a bad joke that all of these formalities impact someone’s case.
people defend it a lot but people with mental disorders are constantly found guilty for things they didn't do because of these things
You lose the court case quickly because you aren't serious about the case, aka not getting properly dressed.
They consider it because it's basic respect, getting dressed properly is just being respectful. Same with how you talk.
Flip flops don't ensure guilt, it's just not being respectful especially when everyone there is properly dressed and you aren't.
I was not prepared for this collab, but im living for it
Imagine someone being savage enough to wear all of those forbidden accessories to the court.
The redditor is annoying, but he's got a point when he mentioned how corrupt this courtroom is.
The collab we didn't think we needed but did
"You don't even know what that means" 💀
I found that an interesting comment because the term "gaslight" was coined in 1944.
Reddit guy sounds unironically BASED...
THE CROSSOVER I NEVER KNEW I NEEDED😂
I’m a hoodie person that never wears anything else. If I can’t go in with a hoodie then just take me straight to jail
Same im wearing my hoodie and they gonna deal with it
But think about this: can't wear a hoodie in jail
@@ibraheemshuaib8954 I’ll figure out a way to do it, like make like a makeshift hood or smtn
Decrimination by clothing
Seems unconstitutional
That guy’s a great actor.
This colab is beyond insane
I've won a case with some shitty old clothes and no shoes at all. It helps when they don't actually have a case.
“Gotta pick up my girlfriend from high school”
“Yeah buddy, that’s exactly why you’re here”
Naaah💀
This is the collab I didn’t know I needed to see
That was a fun collab!
The only collab that works for a video topic like this
Oh hell yeah! The crossover we all needed!!! 😂
i love the slappable jerk yipeeee
I was not expecting this collab at all 😂 but glad to see it
A collab I didn't know I needed 😂
The slappable jerk is perfect 😂😂😂😂