If you enjoyed my content: Please consider supporting me on Patreon: www.patreon.com/EurasiaNavalinsight or my Buy Me A Coffee page: www.buymeacoffee.com/navalinsight Big thank you to all current and past supporters!
@@B3A5T63 If you don't mind my two cents: It's a copy of the last gen US systems and carrier groups,- but about 15 years out of date. Still, China will catch up eventually; it's inevitable. Unfortunately, the days of "force projection" have passed, other than to scare smaller countries into allowing foreign military bases on their soil. . . Ships are capital intensive and too easily destroyed by cheap missiles and torpedoes. Much better to invest in submarines, missiles and stealth aircraft (But we can do without the balloons) I still hope that in the future, USA and China can work together instead of fighting against one another. There has to be some common ground between capitalism and communisim which will allow both to exist in harmony with the freedoms and rights that all people deserve. 💙🇺🇸❤🇨🇳🤍
@@potatonoodlebear8035 the best Navy in the world won't be scared of it. The USN is the best Navy in the world period. CVN-72 USS ABRAHAM LINCOLN 91-93
It's interesting to see the difference in design philosophy between Chinese and American carrier groups. A US carrier strike group is essentially a mobile air base, designed to take control of hostile airspace, while Chinese strike groups seem much more like traditional war fleets focused on winning control of the sea. I suppose a lot of that is due to the ability gap (as well as sheer numbers gap) between the two nations' carriers, but it also seems to be in keeping with broader differences between the global missions of the PLAN and USN.
The main difference is the PLAN can only fight in its own back yard making it a defensive Navy. US Navy is an offensive Navy, meaning it can conduct multi level engagements anywhere any time.
@@zetareticulan321 Goes to show who is wanting to get its reach to be another warmonger imperialist. Just look at the man made fortified islands, stepping stones.
@@nguyep4 I guess you haven't received any explosive gifts from China. Pathetically you never think up with those countries were actually received 'DEMOCRACY' from US huh.
These aircraft carriers are only needed for the second and third island chain. They can be supported by china air force assets like long range bombers,cargo planes,early warning and reconnaissance planes
EMALS ("electromagnetic aircraft launch system"), has one major advantage that’s rarely discussed. Yes, it can launch heavier aircraft such as the J-15B, though more importantly, its advantages over steam is the fact that every launch is calibrated for the exact weight and capacity of each respective platform, which now can include, UAVs, UCAVs, etc. Steam catapults would have tore them apart because they aren’t designed to take into account weight and launch speed variables. This is a massive advantage, you can damn near launch anything from them. Their CVBGs, soon to be CVNBGs, will have much longer range strike capabilities than western navies, due to their PL series and the ASMs from escorts, though that doesn’t always equate to better!
It will be interesting to see how committed China would be on the EMAILS carriers. They are yet to finish their 1st carrier with only plans for the next one. The Americans already have 2 finished carriers 1 in service and the other under sea trials. The Americans are building one more and several others are planned. So America as of now is more committed. Arguably tho China doesn't need as many
@@ulikemyname6744 I don’t believe that is the case, China will use EMALS on the Type 076s and multiple carriers to come, at some point, they’ll have at least five carriers, most likely more.
The problem is they don't have it yet. They just claimed it's going to be so great like they do with all of their weapons before it's even made and tested... The CCP makes a lot of claims and most don't pan out.... Like everything made in China, it's going to be pure trash and break immediately...
A Superior video posting 'Eurasia'!!! Your knowledge of naval tactics is Quite impressive, and the use of PLAN subs is also .... Spot-On! Being a former USN sailor, it is Very Impressive and interesting to see how Much of the "designs" of PLAN a-c, technologies, etc are similar to USN ....🤔🤔 BUT, I must say again....it is the 'Sailor' that moves the ship, and that sailor MUST have ALL the proper training and rigor, ( of which ....... I don't know about, since I have Never trained with PLAN sailors, but have with Other allied nations of the Pacific = RIMPACs ) Again thanks for the posting......look forward to see More vids of PLAN, but what about other navies of SE Asia....I mean, you Are 'Euraisa'??🤔🤨
Hey friend, thanks for your support and comments. Just on whether you will see videos on other navies - this channel will be focused on PLAN going forward. However, please subscribe to my other channel (link: www.youtube.com/@NavalEnthusiast), where I will talk about navies other than the PLAN. Cheers
1 US ton is only 0.907 metric tonne. So the much touted 100,000 ton Ford carrier is only 90,700 metric tonnes. Fujian is only be slightly lighter than the US carrier. The older Nimitz US steel may have much lower yield strength compared to the newer Chinese hulls.
@@zetareticulan321 Rapid Dragon available next year when it is supposed to be available for use (it won't be) would make short work of it.....new reef between China and Taiwan
I suspect China will use their AG600 to drop off and retrieve sensor stations hundreds of miles in front of the task force. Sensor stations that unreel linear strings of sonar sensors thousands of feet down plus surface & air sensors. Possibly manned and armed with anti sub torpedo. The AG600 is big enough to do it
Lots of misconceptions abound in this video! -Submarines and ASW - America could use their submarines a picket against Soviet boats, because the latter were loud enough to be detected before they could pick up American subs. As technology improves and submarine stealth pushes their noise below background, submarines will detect each other at shorter and shorter ranges, likely resulting in mutual kills. -Thermocline - This is why all 1st rate ASW warships carry a variable depth towed array, which is hardly something new anyhow. -"Biggest difference between Type 055 and Type 052 is firepower" No, I would say the sensor fit (and support capability to keep it running for extended periods) is the most important difference. Adding more firepower can be done fairly cheaply (see Russian fetish for deck canisters) but electronics, thermal regulation, and main radar are things that are difficult and expensive to retrofit. The Burke's main cooling plant, for example, weighs a few hundred tons and has to be placed far above the waterline (near the radar systems) which imposes far more constraints on ship design than a VLS which can be put closer to or even below the ship's center of gravity. -"Air defense command will be handled on the Type 55" A few years back I've heard the opposite, that the Air Defense command would be hosted directly on the Carrier.
Not sure if I misconceived anything. There's a clear difference in opinions, based on different interpretation of facts. For example, your VDS is not going to have the same power or even coverage as a conformal bow sonar on a submarine. Just having a VDS can allow a ship to do something, but far from good enough. Ocean background noise is a nice terminology, but the issue is when used in a vacuum it is necessarily an average concept. There are situations where a submarine will be louder, especially if it is not prioritizing noise reduction at that time.
I think the carrier air group composition cshould be like this : Notional Air Wing - 70 aircraft 24 J-35 Fighter-Strike/GJ-11 UCAV 24 J-15 Fighter-Strike/Tanker/drone Controller 6 J-15 Electronic Warfare 6 KJ-600 Airborne Early Warning & Control 8 Z-18 Anti-Submarine Warfare 2 Z-18 SAR/COD
Trivia: conventionally and nuclear-powered aircraft carriers are complementary, not substitutes. The combat effectiveness of an aircraft carrier is always the ejection rate of the aircraft. The speed of a carrier fleet is always determined by the slowest ship. The combatants on a nuclear-powered carrier also need to eat. College of shandong ship launching claimed 50000 tons, 67000 tons, actually. 075 when entering college claimed twenty thousand tons, 40000 tons of actual. When college in fujian ship launching claimed more than 80000 tons, as to how many tons of surplus will see later. College when calculating the weight, the United States with short tons, China use metric tons. A ton in the United States is about 0.94 tons, which means 940 kilograms, not 1,000 kilograms. Another factor is that the yield strength of the steel plate of the American aircraft carrier is about 850 mpa, while that of the Chinese aircraft carrier is about 2,200 mpa. The steel plate of the aircraft carrier can be thinner and lighter if the size and strength of the aircraft carrier are not reduced.
I somewhat question China's claims about hardened steel. China still purchases hardened steel from other countries for everyday manufacturing because they can't produce it themselves. Yet for the navy they claim better than 2 times the strength of western steel?
their carrier strike groups need to be carrier task forces that have 2 type 055's, 2 type 052's, 2 type 054's, 4 type 056's, 1 type 075, 1 type 076, 1 type 071, 3 type 093's, 2 oilers and 2 supply ships, and obviously an aircraft carrier
Type 56 is abit small to chase carriers around bad weather will toss them around to much. Chinese frigates are large they could use a couple more of them, the 56 is more a littoral corvette.
056 are too slow to guard a carrier group, they need everything above 30knots in order to maneuver on the outskirt of the group. thats probably why they are replacing 054A with 054B. just imagine ur group are turning left, ur right flank destroyer would need to travel faster in order to keep up with the group. otherwise ur right flank would be exposed to things like submarines and ships like 075 or 076 should not travel with the carrier group, as their job is coast landing mission and they are 20-24knots ships, unless 076 giveup/shrink their dock and make it a 30knots light carrier(in that case they should not bare the naming of type 07X )
China's actor/soldiers may look imposing to some as they go through the motions of combat troops, but the first day of actual hostilities , and casualties , will help to make them not so eager to die for the Party.
Was checking out Google Earth, why does it look like China has 2 of these newer carriers already? One in dry dock and the other pier side. Maybe the images are two different times but they are close to each other so Idk..
GE has some issues with updating their pictures from different time. Both ACs you saw in China's shipyard are actually from the same AC, but from different time.
This was the Dream of the Naval Officers and Generals of the former USRR especially Admiral Sergey Georgyevich Gorshkov and it is fulfilled by the People's Liberation Army Navy
It is only opinion .....but I think the type-55 destroyers is really a cruiser .....very comparable to the US Navy's Ticonderoga class cruisers but larger...
No China's navy won't be feared anytime soon! They have only 3 aircraft carriers, the US has 11 the UK has 2 . The Chinese carriers still leave a lot to be desired. Most of China's navy consist of smaller vessels only about 20% of their naval assets offer any type of threat, powerful they are not
There was something they liked about that Russian carrier. They experiment and learn. I love to witness the birth of a great Navy and hope to never see it fire a shot in anger.
Really, feared ! , not compared to the USA coalition strike groups in the region , especially the new VSTOL ones who like the rest now, operate with an architecture of integrated sensor networking that enables them to see well beyond the range of their own ships sensors which enable them to operate at maximum range from well over the horizon re: datalinks !
As the Chinese navy doesn't have the same global dominance doctrine as the US navy, in theory, they should have more naval assets available to protect their carriers, and coastline!
My dear friends, with the effort you showed building this US-type “sitting-duck” which is ineffective during war scenarios in the age of hypersonic weapons etc. you could have built up to 100 thousand of the most modern residential houses the world has ever seen. If the objectives are showing strength and superiority to the world what would achieve more ? If further objectives are to show peacefulness, moral- and intellectual superiority what would achieve more ? If the objectives are economic growth and prosperity for the people of China ? Please let the best experts from around the world help your experts with the creation of next generation residential, fully autonomous, modular homes. It could become Chinas greatest export and excel the economic development of Asian and African countries for the common goal of solving the global water- energy- housing- and food crises. I know you can do it.
Only if they are attacked because their carriers are a coastal defense force and having spent years on carriers theres no way they can match our intensity
The one thing you can always count on are our Chinese friends always boasting about their latest achievements. Ironically, they also boast about how peace loving they are, but include "will be feared by our enemies." China is such a good neighbor; I can't imagine that they have any enemies.
The channel appears to be run by a Russian man. But there are still plenty of boasts on the Chinese internet space saying about how fearsome their new weaponry are. Chinese commentators with a lot of nuance also comment that their fleets at the moment are not a match for the American fleets. They cannot match the Americans and the allied forces in quantity, training and experience. Regarding the Chinese relationships with their neighbours, Nepal, Bhutan, and some countries have positive relationships with China. Vietnam, India and others have mixed feelings.
It's a copy of the US carriers, and strike group - but about 15 years out of date. Still, China will catch up eventually; it's inevitable. Unfortunately, the days of "force projection" have passed, other than to scare smaller countries into allowing foreign military bases on their soil. . . Ships are capital intensive and too easily destroyed by cheap missiles and torpedoes. Much better to invest in submarines, missiles and stealth aircraft (But we can do without the balloons) I still hope that in the future, USA and China can work together instead of fighting against one another. There has to be some common ground between capitalism and communisim which will allow both to exist in harmony with the freedoms and rights that all people deserve. 💙🇺🇸❤🇨🇳🤍
@@xshplay7255 china unmanned submarine has rammed the US Connecticut in 2022. The report from the US Navy was hit unknown object 😅😅😅 It will slap the US face if they tell the truth and fail to scam australia to buy 5 nuclear submarine. Sometime i think USA and China are teaming up to scam other countries.
yeah lots of stuff they are "supposed" to have......yet to see real-world proof of any field-tested actual system that are effective beyond what the West has
How many oil tankers are they going to have in place. The one true weakness is that it's not nuclear powered. They won't be able to go far from home. That is good news for the U. S.
China is still JV. Not even close to the power of a U.S. carrier group! And the only Chinese that MIGHT …. MIGHT take part in hostilities carries half the air wing which is made up of inferior aircraft!
@@ulikemyname6744 I am not sure about that. Fleet size numbers show that the US military can’t keep pace with China’s naval growth. The People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) surpassed the US Navy in fleet size sometime around 2020 and now has around 340 warships, according to the Pentagon’s 2022 China Military Power Report. China’s fleet is expected to grow to 400 ships in the next two years, the report says. Meanwhile, the US fleet sits under 300 ships... Lastly, I don't think that the Chinese need a large number of carriers anyway..
@@zix_zix_zix Yeah but most of them are smaller ships. America is not building things like corvettes or a big number of patrol vessels. China is also building smaller destroyers for the most part. And America is replacing ships while China is building capabilities. If the US is not replacing ships they would be just as big if not larger but it is pointless.
Pfft anyone without 100 years of blue water navy experience sure. They're far, far, behind the 65 years plus of operating aircraft carriers in combat conditions. The US has lost carriers in combat before, sure it's been awhile since, but it's an experience that has to be endured to be appreciated.
You mean the same carrier that already has cracks in the rear 3rd of its deck? I'll believe that when it proves itself. I'm not for Russian or Chinese claims with zero proof
@Eurasia Naval Insight my comments are specifically in regards to the lack of proof. Everything we know about 003 is from what the Chinese have told the public. None of it is from what they've shown or given evidence. Just look at EMALS, and how much the US has struggled for years to make it work reliably with unlimited nuclear power to run it. Yet no video is ever shown with CCP even testing their's. I've only ever seen images where they're covered on deck. Why?
@Eurasia Naval Insight along that idea, you don't have proof of the capabilities of the Fujian either. Just the PLAN claims of what it can do. I enjoy watching military content but don't understand why you seem to take offense at somebody questioning ship abilities with zero evidence
..and you know this how exactly? Just wondering because they have proven to be extremely effective and disciplined in everything they have done so far..
Your being generous. PLAN has a way to go before venturing out of its waters very far. 1st of all I'd like to see the 003 do sea trials and what is can do. Shake down cruise is essential but so is actual flight ops etc. I'm a bit surprised that China didn't make a CVN type carrier. They can do conventional no prob. I don't think they are in a rush. However a bit more thinking and time may have resulted in a nuke powered carrier. Unless they will stay in close to China waters, then conventional would suffice.
@@mooglemy3813 PLAN are not interested in "venturing out of its waters very far", so true blue-water capability is not a high priority to them right now. That's precisely why they' re not investing heavily in developing super carriers.
You may want to check those Chinese-made Frigates for Thailand Navy back then, according to reports, Chinese shipyards use a low-quality metal sheet, as it is vulnerable to rust, and body frame fatigue and it even reaches early the supposed to be time table maintenance for dry dock instead. With China's naval construction urgency, that event surpasses the quantity of the US Fleet, I doubt big time if these vessels are of top quality in terms of engineering, materials used like metal plates, engine integration, components into it like radars, sensors, etc. Haha
According to my sources in the Chinese Strategic Huyou Agency, they are all paper ships/planes cannot even match with the US 7th fleet. Just like the russian ships pose absolutely no threat to us.
@@danlee8640 I know, however even with that, the Type 003 is below the Nimitz. (turn on close captioning as some stats oddly are blured out on video but close captioning shows em lol). th-cam.com/video/njGehDq7pXE/w-d-xo.html
@@The_Zilli type 003 is just iterative design for china, if you follow PLAN ships development you already know they always do this, type 003 is just "proof of concept" for them to get electromagnetic catapult deployment data Furthermore, you also ignore how fast china develop their aircraft carrier tech They just get their first carrier during 2000 era, just in 20 years they leap from ski jump to electromagnetic catapult, bypassing steam based catapult
@@cj64343 lol no, electromagnetic catapult advantages is you can launch from light drones to heavy aircraft, it also faster to launch. The capability to launch drones itself is already far better than other carriers
Taiwan's new "Xionghang" stealthy high-altitude hypersonic orbit-changing cruise missile has a range of more than 2,000 kilometers; the "Xiong Falcon" stealthy, ground-to-sea supersonic orbit-changing cruise missile has a range of more than 800 kilometers. Both types of missile warheads are equipped with radar guidance seekers, infrared image seekers, and AI identification systems, so that the missiles can attack moving targets at sea or land targets. They are dual-purpose anti-ship and land-attack missiles. A new high-performance AI chip is added to calculate the image of the captured target for enhanced recognition, so that the missile has an AI smart missile with a similar eye recognition function. This is why "Xionghang" and "Xiong Falcon" have completed 20 live tests, with a hit rate of 100%. Both "Xionghang" and "Xiong Falcon" can communicate with satellites, early warning aircraft, and drone. They can also use pre-installed geographical orientation map data without relying on GPS, and use the INS inertial navigation system to navigate to the enemy's target area , start the scanning of the radar infrared image finder to find the target, and the AI eye algorithm recognizes and compares the image parameters of the enemy target in the missile computer to identify the target to attack. AI eyes can identify interference flame shields and false targets, and only attack real targets; because of the AI eye function, missiles are not interfered by enemy electronic warfare, and use high-speed and high-performance AI chips to calculate and filter out enemy interference electromagnetic waves, and can also reversely capture the interference source and report the coordinates of the enemy interference source to the friendly drone and early warning aircraft through the data link to carry out follow-up strikes. The flight computer of the missile can pre-plan the path of flying around to deceive the enemy, and change the attack target through the data link, and carry out coordinated group attack operations with the same missile network.
If you enjoyed my content:
Please consider supporting me on Patreon: www.patreon.com/EurasiaNavalinsight
or my Buy Me A Coffee page: www.buymeacoffee.com/navalinsight
Big thank you to all current and past supporters!
Do you think the type 055 destroyer will be a match for the DDGX
@@B3A5T63
If you don't mind my two cents:
It's a copy of the last gen US systems and carrier groups,- but about 15 years out of date.
Still, China will catch up eventually; it's inevitable.
Unfortunately, the days of "force projection" have passed, other than to scare smaller countries into allowing foreign military bases on their soil.
. .
Ships are capital intensive and too easily destroyed by cheap missiles and torpedoes.
Much better to invest in submarines, missiles and stealth aircraft
(But we can do without the balloons)
I still hope that in the future, USA and China can work together instead of fighting against one another. There has to be some common ground between capitalism and communisim which will allow both to exist in harmony with the freedoms and rights that all people deserve.
💙🇺🇸❤🇨🇳🤍
no.
Deeply underrated channel.
Bang on!
agreed
Criminally…
Not underrated but not well known
@@wogelson best way to put it there's a lot of channels that talk about the same stuff as him he's not well known TH-camr
Thanks
Hey thanks so much, sir!
Absolutely fantastic reporting, I live watching your content
Thanks so much!
It is the KJ-600 AEW on the Fujian, not the KJ-500 .
Yup I mispoke
@@EurasiaNaval your only human don't worry😀
Nothing like waking up to an excellent Eurasia naval video!!
Thanks mate!
@@AreaCode757 Just because someone defends China, they are a Wumao? Then in the same sense, I can call you an ignorant person
@@AreaCode757 He's an American Taiwanese I think, Wumao for any objections huh?
I just can't wait for the 1/700 model kit of the Fujian to be affordable, it will be a nice model kit.
hmmm, to be placed beside my 14 years old Kitty Hawk model.
@@Lcr34 a carrier for aircraft carriers?
you won't get one because China is buying them all up to increase the size of their navy even more
@@potatonoodlebear8035 the best Navy in the world won't be scared of it. The USN is the best Navy in the world period. CVN-72 USS ABRAHAM LINCOLN 91-93
@@ronaldpetrovich The us has addmitted it might not be able to beat the chinese navy, so it might be the best for now but probaly not for much longer
It's interesting to see the difference in design philosophy between Chinese and American carrier groups. A US carrier strike group is essentially a mobile air base, designed to take control of hostile airspace, while Chinese strike groups seem much more like traditional war fleets focused on winning control of the sea. I suppose a lot of that is due to the ability gap (as well as sheer numbers gap) between the two nations' carriers, but it also seems to be in keeping with broader differences between the global missions of the PLAN and USN.
The main difference is the PLAN can only fight in its own back yard making it a defensive
Navy. US Navy is an offensive Navy, meaning it can conduct multi level engagements anywhere any time.
Goes to show you who really is the warmongering imperialists.
@@zetareticulan321 Goes to show who is wanting to get its reach to be another warmonger imperialist. Just look at the man made fortified islands, stepping stones.
@@Largeportion1000 It has to be due to its hostile foreign policies, well welcome to the de_dollarization of the multi polar world as US declines.
@@nguyep4 I guess you haven't received any explosive gifts from China. Pathetically you never think up with those countries were actually received 'DEMOCRACY' from US huh.
Most interesting.
Thank you for this video.
☮
I consider your videos in the Top 5 of Military content on TH-cam maybe in the top 3, especially when I hear the background music 🥇
exc. overview of the battlegroup (gr8 graphics of the fujian). very tight production and commentary, no flab, all protein.👌
These aircraft carriers are only needed for the second and third island chain. They can be supported by china air force assets like long range bombers,cargo planes,early warning and reconnaissance planes
EMALS ("electromagnetic aircraft launch system"), has one major advantage that’s rarely discussed. Yes, it can launch heavier aircraft such as the J-15B, though more importantly, its advantages over steam is the fact that every launch is calibrated for the exact weight and capacity of each respective platform, which now can include, UAVs, UCAVs, etc. Steam catapults would have tore them apart because they aren’t designed to take into account weight and launch speed variables. This is a massive advantage, you can damn near launch anything from them. Their CVBGs, soon to be CVNBGs, will have much longer range strike capabilities than western navies, due to their PL series and the ASMs from escorts, though that doesn’t always equate to better!
It will be interesting to see how committed China would be on the EMAILS carriers. They are yet to finish their 1st carrier with only plans for the next one. The Americans already have 2 finished carriers 1 in service and the other under sea trials. The Americans are building one more and several others are planned. So America as of now is more committed. Arguably tho China doesn't need as many
@@ulikemyname6744 I don’t believe that is the case, China will use EMALS on the Type 076s and multiple carriers to come, at some point, they’ll have at least five carriers, most likely more.
The problem is they don't have it yet. They just claimed it's going to be so great like they do with all of their weapons before it's even made and tested... The CCP makes a lot of claims and most don't pan out.... Like everything made in China, it's going to be pure trash and break immediately...
@@ulikemyname6744 I would see your words as cope until you explain why the US is taking parts from USS Ford and install them to USS J.F.Kennedy.
@@ulikemyname6744 China is building 1 UK navy every 2 years.Amercia know and admit that they cannot fight that.
J35 will be target coordinator(awacs) + J15 missile truck - to maximize attack capability
A Superior video posting 'Eurasia'!!!
Your knowledge of naval tactics is Quite impressive, and the use of PLAN subs is also .... Spot-On!
Being a former USN sailor, it is Very Impressive and interesting to see how Much of the "designs" of PLAN a-c, technologies, etc are similar to USN ....🤔🤔 BUT, I must say again....it is the 'Sailor' that moves the ship, and that sailor MUST have ALL the proper training and rigor, ( of which ....... I don't know about, since I have Never trained with PLAN sailors, but have with Other allied nations of the Pacific = RIMPACs )
Again thanks for the posting......look forward to see More vids of PLAN, but what about other navies of SE Asia....I mean, you Are 'Euraisa'??🤔🤨
Hey friend, thanks for your support and comments. Just on whether you will see videos on other navies - this channel will be focused on PLAN going forward. However, please subscribe to my other channel (link: www.youtube.com/@NavalEnthusiast), where I will talk about navies other than the PLAN. Cheers
What are your opinion about Indian Navy sailors?
1 US ton is only 0.907 metric tonne. So the much touted 100,000 ton Ford carrier is only 90,700 metric tonnes. Fujian is only be slightly lighter than the US carrier. The older Nimitz US steel may have much lower yield strength compared to the newer Chinese hulls.
Pretty deadly carrier group. Can't wait for Fujian to launch something from the emals catapults
LOL. They will be lucky to get that tofu carrier to work by 2030...
Keep coping, Deebil.
@@zetareticulan321 Rapid Dragon available next year when it is supposed to be available for use (it won't be) would make short work of it.....new reef between China and Taiwan
That’s a beautiful ship. China should be very proud.
It doesn't work. Engines don't produce enough electricity to run systems and engines.
Thanks for the fantastic content!! I have only ONE request: can you bring back that awesome background music in your videos?
I'll consider it. The problem is I always turn it to very low volume anyway... so I thought it makes little difference
@@EurasiaNaval It was perfect as it was; it adds some drama to your narration. Made a big difference in my opinion!
@@zix_zix_zix I see!
@@EurasiaNaval Naw ... background music sucks.
I suspect China will use their AG600 to drop off and retrieve sensor stations hundreds of miles in front of the task force. Sensor stations that unreel linear strings of sonar sensors thousands of feet down plus surface & air sensors. Possibly manned and armed with anti sub torpedo. The AG600 is big enough to do it
Why the AG600? It's not like you need to land on the sea in order to drop sensors, other than the "cool" factor.
@@賴志偉-d7h to pick them up and move them as the situation changes
@@douginorlando6260 has the AG600 been introduced into service with the PLA already?
Will still be sunk very quickly after you sink our older ones🤔
Lots of misconceptions abound in this video!
-Submarines and ASW - America could use their submarines a picket against Soviet boats, because the latter were loud enough to be detected before they could pick up American subs. As technology improves and submarine stealth pushes their noise below background, submarines will detect each other at shorter and shorter ranges, likely resulting in mutual kills.
-Thermocline - This is why all 1st rate ASW warships carry a variable depth towed array, which is hardly something new anyhow.
-"Biggest difference between Type 055 and Type 052 is firepower" No, I would say the sensor fit (and support capability to keep it running for extended periods) is the most important difference. Adding more firepower can be done fairly cheaply (see Russian fetish for deck canisters) but electronics, thermal regulation, and main radar are things that are difficult and expensive to retrofit. The Burke's main cooling plant, for example, weighs a few hundred tons and has to be placed far above the waterline (near the radar systems) which imposes far more constraints on ship design than a VLS which can be put closer to or even below the ship's center of gravity.
-"Air defense command will be handled on the Type 55" A few years back I've heard the opposite, that the Air Defense command would be hosted directly on the Carrier.
Not sure if I misconceived anything. There's a clear difference in opinions, based on different interpretation of facts. For example, your VDS is not going to have the same power or even coverage as a conformal bow sonar on a submarine. Just having a VDS can allow a ship to do something, but far from good enough. Ocean background noise is a nice terminology, but the issue is when used in a vacuum it is necessarily an average concept. There are situations where a submarine will be louder, especially if it is not prioritizing noise reduction at that time.
OK! (gave you a thumbs up)
Type 055 - is really a Cruiser (it’s huge), not sure why its called Destroyer
Well, the Zumwalt is 50% lager than a type 055, but it's still a Destroyer.
This video reminded me so much of reading about USSR warships back in the 70s and 80s.
I think the carrier air group composition cshould be like this :
Notional Air Wing - 70 aircraft
24 J-35 Fighter-Strike/GJ-11 UCAV
24 J-15 Fighter-Strike/Tanker/drone Controller
6 J-15 Electronic Warfare
6 KJ-600 Airborne Early Warning & Control
8 Z-18 Anti-Submarine Warfare
2 Z-18 SAR/COD
What are your thoughts about taiwans (planned) new generation type frigate and lpd
Taiwan belongs to China
LoL
Bwaha haha
Trivia: conventionally and nuclear-powered aircraft carriers are complementary, not substitutes. The combat effectiveness of an aircraft carrier is always the ejection rate of the aircraft. The speed of a carrier fleet is always determined by the slowest ship. The combatants on a nuclear-powered carrier also need to eat. College of shandong ship launching claimed 50000 tons, 67000 tons, actually. 075 when entering college claimed twenty thousand tons, 40000 tons of actual. When college in fujian ship launching claimed more than 80000 tons, as to how many tons of surplus will see later. College when calculating the weight, the United States with short tons, China use metric tons. A ton in the United States is about 0.94 tons, which means 940 kilograms, not 1,000 kilograms. Another factor is that the yield strength of the steel plate of the American aircraft carrier is about 850 mpa, while that of the Chinese aircraft carrier is about 2,200 mpa. The steel plate of the aircraft carrier can be thinner and lighter if the size and strength of the aircraft carrier are not reduced.
老哥你头像太逗了！
@@-soul3706 哈哈哈
I somewhat question China's claims about hardened steel. China still purchases hardened steel from other countries for everyday manufacturing because they can't produce it themselves. Yet for the navy they claim better than 2 times the strength of western steel?
八嘎，不要以为我认不出你是中国人😂
The Fujian with zero J-15Bs and zero J-35s will not inspire fear. How many of each plane are combat ready today?
Imagine a nuclear powered carrier with a nuclear powered cruiser escort able to outrun submarines.
Great!🌹🌹🌹
Like I said before, PLAN needs a new generation of fast supply ship with top speed over 30 knots.
我觉得中国第一艘水面核动力舰艇就是补给舰😅一是验证、二是速度。。。
The oiler would have to be as long as the Fujian herself. Length is what limits the top speed of ships.
For what?
901 : ?
Nice, I guess in due time its time to test all these capabilities in actual war.
Why are there cracks in the deck of Fujian aircraft carrier.
It’s water flowing
their carrier strike groups need to be carrier task forces that have 2 type 055's, 2 type 052's, 2 type 054's, 4 type 056's, 1 type 075, 1 type 076, 1 type 071, 3 type 093's, 2 oilers and 2 supply ships, and obviously an aircraft carrier
Type 56 is abit small to chase carriers around bad weather will toss them around to much. Chinese frigates are large they could use a couple more of them, the 56 is more a littoral corvette.
@@bestestusername type 056 is is more than capable of going in the open ocean
056 are too slow to guard a carrier group, they need everything above 30knots in order to maneuver on the outskirt of the group. thats probably why they are replacing 054A with 054B.
just imagine ur group are turning left, ur right flank destroyer would need to travel faster in order to keep up with the group. otherwise ur right flank would be exposed to things like submarines
and ships like 075 or 076 should not travel with the carrier group, as their job is coast landing mission and they are 20-24knots ships, unless 076 giveup/shrink their dock and make it a 30knots light carrier(in that case they should not bare the naming of type 07X )
Awesome informative commentary likely watched by the Pentagon..I wonder if they click the thumbs up?
Bring it!
Sincerely,
USN
Nice Ford Carrier and Burke III 90% build with imported Chinese shipbuilding requirements
Awesome fireworks
China's actor/soldiers may look imposing to some as they go through the motions of combat troops, but the first day of actual hostilities , and casualties , will help to make them not so eager to die for the Party.
K…
Was checking out Google Earth, why does it look like China has 2 of these newer carriers already? One in dry dock and the other pier side. Maybe the images are two different times but they are close to each other so Idk..
GE has some issues with updating their pictures from different time. Both ACs you saw in China's shipyard are actually from the same AC, but from different time.
Didn't the deck just cracked?
What is the range of chines ship cared anti-ship missiles?
Yj-21 has around 1500km. Yj-12 has 250-400km. Yj-18 has 220-550km
The underbelly of J35 / FC31 in the photo looks like a turtle!
The oval shape reminds me of one
If it’s made like everything else they make we have nothing to worry about it will break down in 2 years
👍👍👍
You should use more date to convince us
Before the end of this decade, hopefully, China will be able to churn out another one or perhaps two more Aircraft Carriers, nuclear powered ones.
What use is an aircraft carrier if you only have second rate aircraft.
They're working on the first rate aircraft - give it some time
US may be more powerful in every way, but China is doing surprisingly well
it is not ...
@@patrolmanracv it is lol
you mean reverse engineering US tech well ? 😅
This was the Dream of the Naval Officers and Generals of the former USRR especially Admiral Sergey Georgyevich Gorshkov and it is fulfilled by the People's Liberation Army Navy
It is only opinion .....but I think the type-55 destroyers is really a cruiser .....very comparable to the US Navy's Ticonderoga class cruisers but larger...
It is! I think its called a destroyer by the PLAN so it does not freakout the Western imperialists.
"Feared by enemies". This phrase includes any civilized nation that does not want to be bullied by mafia tyrants.
Well done China powerful advanced SuperCarrier in the world. ❤💪💪👍👍👏👏💯💯❤❤
No China's navy won't be feared anytime soon! They have only 3 aircraft carriers, the US has 11 the UK has 2 . The Chinese carriers still leave a lot to be desired. Most of China's navy consist of smaller vessels only about 20% of their naval assets offer any type of threat, powerful they are not
Says you.
There was something they liked about that Russian carrier. They experiment and learn. I love to witness the birth of a great Navy and hope to never see it fire a shot in anger.
Really, feared ! , not compared to the USA coalition strike groups in the region , especially the new VSTOL ones who like the rest now, operate with an architecture of integrated sensor networking that enables them to see well beyond the range of their own ships sensors which enable them to operate at maximum range from well over the horizon re: datalinks !
China need a 100 years of experience to do this... 😂😂😂
Because it will accidentally sink and cause a shipping hazard?
As the Chinese navy doesn't have the same global dominance doctrine as the US navy, in theory, they should have more naval assets available to protect their carriers, and coastline!
The Chinese Nave does not have Dominance YET. They will in 20 years once they get their carrier fleets up and running.
My dear friends, with the effort you showed building this US-type “sitting-duck” which is ineffective during war scenarios in the age of hypersonic weapons etc. you could have built up to 100 thousand of the most modern residential houses the world has ever seen. If the objectives are showing strength and superiority to the world what would achieve more ? If further objectives are to show peacefulness, moral- and intellectual superiority what would achieve more ? If the objectives are economic growth and prosperity for the people of China ? Please let the best experts from around the world help your experts with the creation of next generation residential, fully autonomous, modular homes. It could become Chinas greatest export and excel the economic development of Asian and African countries for the common goal of solving the global water- energy- housing- and food crises. I know you can do it.
If they can make stealth aircraft, they can also make stealth missles.
该有防御导弹
Who feared?
I don't think I have ever heard this kind of accent anywhere else
Only if they are attacked because their carriers are a coastal defense force and having spent years on carriers theres no way they can match our intensity
The one thing you can always count on are our Chinese friends always boasting about their latest achievements. Ironically, they also boast about how peace loving they are, but include "will be feared by our enemies." China is such a good neighbor; I can't imagine that they have any enemies.
The channel appears to be run by a Russian man. But there are still plenty of boasts on the Chinese internet space saying about how fearsome their new weaponry are.
Chinese commentators with a lot of nuance also comment that their fleets at the moment are not a match for the American fleets. They cannot match the Americans and the allied forces in quantity, training and experience.
Regarding the Chinese relationships with their neighbours, Nepal, Bhutan, and some countries have positive relationships with China. Vietnam, India and others have mixed feelings.
@@minborox Eurasia Naval Insight is Taiwanese.
Why you keep on saying J55? It’s J35
Is it realistically possible to convert the other two Chinese carriers into CATOBAR configuration?
China really caught up 😅
It's a copy of the US carriers, and strike group - but about 15 years out of date.
Still, China will catch up eventually; it's inevitable.
Unfortunately, the days of "force projection" have passed, other than to scare smaller countries into allowing foreign military bases on their soil.
. .
Ships are capital intensive and too easily destroyed by cheap missiles and torpedoes.
Much better to invest in submarines, missiles and stealth aircraft
(But we can do without the balloons)
I still hope that in the future, USA and China can work together instead of fighting against one another. There has to be some common ground between capitalism and communisim which will allow both to exist in harmony with the freedoms and rights that all people deserve.
💙🇺🇸❤🇨🇳🤍
But just as they say they can sink American carriers, they'll be bound to the same logic against their own carriers.
@@RustyStringz China's EMCL is successfully tested and more advance than the latest US carrier..
@@alexlee7403 Not true
@@alexlee7403
"More advanced" in what way?
You do realize that the US Navy doesn't publish actual specifications for current systems.
China has developed stealth torpedoes that can track, follow & swirling towards a submarine & destroy it!
really tell them to upgrade first their submarine its to much noise can easiy be detected on sonar
@@xshplay7255 china unmanned submarine has rammed the US Connecticut in 2022.
The report from the US Navy was hit unknown object 😅😅😅
It will slap the US face if they tell the truth and fail to scam australia to buy 5 nuclear submarine.
Sometime i think USA and China are teaming up to scam other countries.
yeah lots of stuff they are "supposed" to have......yet to see real-world proof of any field-tested actual system that are effective beyond what the West has
How many oil tankers are they going to have in place. The one true weakness is that it's not nuclear powered. They won't be able to go far from home. That is good news for the U. S.
Just two submarins certainly not enough to play the scout role, to be lethal, 6 to 10 sub looks ideal
China is still JV. Not even close to the power of a U.S. carrier group! And the only Chinese that MIGHT …. MIGHT take part in hostilities carries half the air wing which is made up of inferior aircraft!
Will they be reared before or after they sink? Cracks in the hull, untrained crews what else is there?
HHHHhhhhaaa !!! Chicom JUNK !!!! 😆
Soon ...... 💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥⚰⚰⚰⚰⚰⚰⚰⚰⚰⚰⚰⚰⚰⚰⚰⚰⚰⚰⚰⚰⚰⚰⚰⚰⚰⚰⚰⚰⚰⚰⚰⚰⚰⚰⚰⚰⚰⚰⚰⚰⚰⚰⚰⚰⚰⚰⚰⚰⚰⚰⚰⚰⚰⚰⚰⚰⚰⚰⚰⚰⚰⚰⚰⚰⚰⚰⚰
Nowonder you're balding, sulky boy.😂
why you draw a paper tiger to scare people. It's not in service and prove it capability.
Taiwan should seriously think and decide to buying weapons from China instead of from the USA.
it's kj-600, kj500 is way larger
No doubt at this pace will be the most powerful Naval force in the world! Congratulations China! The world needs balance! BRAVO CHINA!
Not really. The Americans are building carriers faster than the Chinese. The Americans are also ramping up pproduction for other capital ships as well
@@ulikemyname6744 Carriers today are like battleships of the second World War! Bad idea!! Time will tell,I guess!
@@ulikemyname6744 I am not sure about that. Fleet size numbers show that the US military can’t keep pace with China’s naval growth. The People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) surpassed the US Navy in fleet size sometime around 2020 and now has around 340 warships, according to the Pentagon’s 2022 China Military Power Report. China’s fleet is expected to grow to 400 ships in the next two years, the report says. Meanwhile, the US fleet sits under 300 ships...
Lastly, I don't think that the Chinese need a large number of carriers anyway..
@@nielsbetts There were carriers during WW2
@@zix_zix_zix Yeah but most of them are smaller ships. America is not building things like corvettes or a big number of patrol vessels. China is also building smaller destroyers for the most part. And America is replacing ships while China is building capabilities. If the US is not replacing ships they would be just as big if not larger but it is pointless.
Aircraft Carrying capacity restricted, need to wait till number 20 carrier
100 tons nuclear-powered.
Why can't a laser weapon be developed to destroy a deep ocean sub?
Lasers don’t do water well…
Pfft anyone without 100 years of blue water navy experience sure.
They're far, far, behind the 65 years plus of operating aircraft carriers in combat conditions. The US has lost carriers in combat before, sure it's been awhile since, but it's an experience that has to be endured to be appreciated.
navy wont be effective if commanded by "pride" idiots
The US has the Hulk and Superman,so good luck!
战忽局就需要你这样的同志😂
Not feared just destroyed
US Navy Institute praise the even the Type-052 for it's capabilities, you're just spewing bullshit.
You mean the same carrier that already has cracks in the rear 3rd of its deck? I'll believe that when it proves itself. I'm not for Russian or Chinese claims with zero proof
It's fluid. You should try to find proof before making unfounded claims
@Eurasia Naval Insight my comments are specifically in regards to the lack of proof. Everything we know about 003 is from what the Chinese have told the public. None of it is from what they've shown or given evidence. Just look at EMALS, and how much the US has struggled for years to make it work reliably with unlimited nuclear power to run it. Yet no video is ever shown with CCP even testing their's. I've only ever seen images where they're covered on deck. Why?
I've seen images of the cracks in the deck if that's what you mean by proof.
@@JD-ft5zq You don't have proof - just your own guesses
@Eurasia Naval Insight along that idea, you don't have proof of the capabilities of the Fujian either. Just the PLAN claims of what it can do. I enjoy watching military content but don't understand why you seem to take offense at somebody questioning ship abilities with zero evidence
Y-20B出来了
也不算那么大的新闻了，毕竟光皮机挂着4台WS-20已经飞了一年多了。 现在算是官宣服役了。
Will be 5 years before they can match the sortie rate of anyone who matters
..and you know this how exactly? Just wondering because they have proven to be extremely effective and disciplined in everything they have done so far..
Your being generous. PLAN has a way to go before venturing out of its waters very far. 1st of all I'd like to see the 003 do sea trials and what is can do. Shake down cruise is essential but so is actual flight ops etc. I'm a bit surprised that China didn't make a CVN type carrier. They can do conventional no prob. I don't think they are in a rush. However a bit more thinking and time may have resulted in a nuke powered carrier. Unless they will stay in close to China waters, then conventional would suffice.
@@mooglemy3813 PLAN are not interested in "venturing out of its waters very far", so true blue-water capability is not a high priority to them right now. That's precisely why they' re not investing heavily in developing super carriers.
Tbey recreated a US carrier battle group.
what he didn't tell you is the government secret about the first one sinking after launch due to design failure
You may want to check those Chinese-made Frigates for Thailand Navy back then, according to reports, Chinese shipyards use a low-quality metal sheet, as it is vulnerable to rust, and body frame fatigue and it even reaches early the supposed to be time table maintenance for dry dock instead. With China's naval construction urgency, that event surpasses the quantity of the US Fleet, I doubt big time if these vessels are of top quality in terms of engineering, materials used like metal plates, engine integration, components into it like radars, sensors, etc. Haha
i doubt that china will make something like that for their own fleet
Well the US NAVY it's the most powerful in the planet still 29 carriers plus the American Allies have carriers good luck China you will need it
According to my sources in the Chinese Strategic Huyou Agency, they are all paper ships/planes cannot even match with the US 7th fleet. Just like the russian ships pose absolutely no threat to us.
According to my friends in the PLAN these ships are very capable and will destroy all US carrier fleets sent to fight China.
Type 055A is coming.
👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
China you must make more Aircraft Carrier.
We will call it a carrier when we see it in action, until then it looks like big hunk of metal.
Sick design
Tactically not in the hunt.
*slow claps* Ford class still greater than Type 003. Nevermind the strike force itself. Type 003 might be on par with the Nimitz or just below it.
ford still having a lot of problems with the catapults
@@danlee8640 I know, however even with that, the Type 003 is below the Nimitz. (turn on close captioning as some stats oddly are blured out on video but close captioning shows em lol). th-cam.com/video/njGehDq7pXE/w-d-xo.html
@@The_Zilli type 003 is just iterative design for china, if you follow PLAN ships development you already know they always do this, type 003 is just "proof of concept" for them to get electromagnetic catapult deployment data
Furthermore, you also ignore how fast china develop their aircraft carrier tech
They just get their first carrier during 2000 era, just in 20 years they leap from ski jump to electromagnetic catapult, bypassing steam based catapult
@@danlee8640 and yet the 03s EMALs are STOLEN designs from Ford class and they don't have problems?......LOL....talk about no critical thinking skills
@@cj64343 lol no, electromagnetic catapult advantages is you can launch from light drones to heavy aircraft, it also faster to launch.
The capability to launch drones itself is already far better than other carriers
Taiwan's new "Xionghang" stealthy high-altitude hypersonic orbit-changing cruise missile has a range of more than 2,000 kilometers; the "Xiong Falcon" stealthy, ground-to-sea supersonic orbit-changing cruise missile has a range of more than 800 kilometers. Both types of missile warheads are equipped with radar guidance seekers, infrared image seekers, and AI identification systems, so that the missiles can attack moving targets at sea or land targets. They are dual-purpose anti-ship and land-attack missiles. A new high-performance AI chip is added to calculate the image of the captured target for enhanced recognition, so that the missile has an AI smart missile with a similar eye recognition function. This is why "Xionghang" and "Xiong Falcon" have completed 20 live tests, with a hit rate of 100%.
Both "Xionghang" and "Xiong Falcon" can communicate with satellites, early warning aircraft, and drone. They can also use pre-installed geographical orientation map data without relying on GPS, and use the INS inertial navigation system to navigate to the enemy's target area , start the scanning of the radar infrared image finder to find the target, and the AI eye algorithm recognizes and compares the image parameters of the enemy target in the missile computer to identify the target to attack. AI eyes can identify interference flame shields and false targets, and only attack real targets; because of the AI eye function, missiles are not interfered by enemy electronic warfare, and use high-speed and high-performance AI chips to calculate and filter out enemy interference electromagnetic waves, and can also reversely capture the interference source and report the coordinates of the enemy interference source to the friendly drone and early warning aircraft through the data link to carry out follow-up strikes. The flight computer of the missile can pre-plan the path of flying around to deceive the enemy, and change the attack target through the data link, and carry out coordinated group attack operations with the same missile network.
Yes the same missiles whose guidance systems was sent to Mainland China for repairs
I don’t what enemy will be feared,….but certainly it would not be the United States 🇺🇸
Comments from a lot of China 🇨🇳 men.
我猜是新西兰英语口音guess it’s New Zealand accent