China's Brand New Aircraft Carrier vs USS Gerald R. Ford Supercarrier - Who Would Win?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 7 ก.พ. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 938

  • @TreXsJournal-Coming-Soon
    @TreXsJournal-Coming-Soon 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I'm never going to get over these 3 plus hour videos! They help me with everything: (1) sleep, (2) lunch break, (3) frustrated car rides, (4) etc. I can't even get over the fact that you give the answers at the very start of your videos, yet some mysterious force keeps me from clicking off 😅

  • @davidbello6316
    @davidbello6316 ปีที่แล้ว +153

    Best TH-cam channel to sleep to thank you keep making 3hr+ videos

    • @Jadon-mx9kc
      @Jadon-mx9kc 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@davidbello6316
      Definitely

  • @DevinClark-hd2qu
    @DevinClark-hd2qu ปีที่แล้ว +164

    You're sleeping and wake up wondering "why do I want an aircraft carrier and a beer"🤯

    • @TK-yh5zz
      @TK-yh5zz 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Average American moment

    • @RossGanley-q7x
      @RossGanley-q7x 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Two thanks,bring them to New Zealand our navy can't even handle a survey ship,and we got no jets, but we're friendly and love American fords.

  • @HarpoonB2
    @HarpoonB2 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    I didn't know they sailed backwards........great vidz buddy keep up the work.

    • @teeess9551
      @teeess9551 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Buddy? Yeah, only the narrator makes these...

    • @axel4196
      @axel4196 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Lol They forgot to mention that they are inverted vessels from the TeneT Universe 👍🏾

  • @stevecanfly52
    @stevecanfly52 ปีที่แล้ว +1721

    It’s like you know people fall asleep listening to these

    • @jakepage7003
      @jakepage7003 ปีที่แล้ว +230

      I've fallen asleep to Infographics every night for like 2 years now. They're perfect as they are interesting and entertaining enough to watch two or three as I settle down and get comfortable in bed, and then when I'm drifting off to sleep I turn the volume down a touch and turn over to sleep.

    • @GhostRyderFPV
      @GhostRyderFPV ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@jakepage7003 Whatever you do, friends, don't fall asleep to a similar military oriented channel, LazerPig..
      You'll be... different. Very very different.

    • @patrickocallaghan4141
      @patrickocallaghan4141 ปีที่แล้ว +78

      Really easy to listen to his voice all night. This man has a gift

    • @plox52gaming
      @plox52gaming ปีที่แล้ว +19

      I do lol

    • @matty1619
      @matty1619 ปีที่แล้ว

      Check out drachinifel (historical naval ships and battles)

  • @SinningsValor
    @SinningsValor ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I'm really digging these long infographic videos

  • @777lufy
    @777lufy ปีที่แล้ว +39

    80% of views are people who fell asleep

    • @ks360720
      @ks360720 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@777lufy facts

  • @kyledabearsfan
    @kyledabearsfan ปีที่แล้ว +284

    US Carriers arent unsinkable nothing is, but America really doesnt like when people mess with our toys. If a country was to attack a carrier and even badly damage it, i imagine the response would be quite... "proportional"

    • @kevinking5406
      @kevinking5406 ปีที่แล้ว +36

      The response would be an over-match. They won't have a navy.

    • @dellingson4833
      @dellingson4833 ปีที่แล้ว +51

      Awesome, "proportional". What the Fat Electrician said about the US sinking half of Iran's navy.

    • @VeChainStacks
      @VeChainStacks ปีที่แล้ว +21

      Quack bang!!

    • @waltergoodwin7463
      @waltergoodwin7463 ปีที่แล้ว

      Proportion response the USA would ICE them in no time giving even the trolls would be pink baloney mist trying to run from their laptops!

    • @Lovepeacejustice
      @Lovepeacejustice ปีที่แล้ว

      Yep USA carriers can sink but sinking one will cause devastating effect instantaneous it never travel alone … don’t make a mockery of CCP naval Chinese carrier is a waste to taxpayers money and you all know 😂😂😂😂😂don’t come here talking about that we all know about it .. anything made in China never last no time

  • @EpicLoLs89
    @EpicLoLs89 ปีที่แล้ว +94

    USA Military's true greatest strength is the complex and efficient logistical capabilities that allow USA to project power far away from home; operational and communication capabilities are unmatched.

    • @patrolmanracv
      @patrolmanracv ปีที่แล้ว +10

      yes so strong ..not winning wars in 70 years Afghanistan 20 years running away ..despite always having overwhelming air power ..carriers are sitting ducks with 90 aircraft onboard against hypersonic missiles ...always under estimating ...that's why can't really win wars ..

    • @EpicLoLs89
      @EpicLoLs89 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      My statement was talking about their capabilities. True those wars we didn't have a favorable outcome but we've won many wars and small conflicts throughout those 70 years.

    • @tedburg6042
      @tedburg6042 ปีที่แล้ว

      Those loses were political. Could have vaporized the places if unleashed.
      The U.S is a world police force. Not a conquerer @@patrolmanracv

    • @DaniloSantos-gy9pf
      @DaniloSantos-gy9pf ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@patrolmanracv no winning of war then why all country including China afraid to usa 🤣🤣

    • @philtorrez4198
      @philtorrez4198 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      @@patrolmanracvIt was America’s politicians that lost those conflicts, not her military.

  • @bbelvito
    @bbelvito ปีที่แล้ว +240

    Video is 3 hrs long because that is how long the Chinese carrier will last in a actual fight

    • @damnit6349
      @damnit6349 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      You win at the Internet to be sure. Well said.

    • @damnit6349
      @damnit6349 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @UBEREEMSUPREME And yet another winner! Seriously that nearly made me evacuate Newcastle through my nose.
      And I take my Newcastle brown VERY seriously.

    • @grandpabill1959
      @grandpabill1959 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Coral reefs in hours. Yep.

    • @samueladams1775
      @samueladams1775 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      The Chinese carrier probably wouldn't last that long. Direct hits in certain areas would cause extremely destructive explosions. About 30 minutes to an hour survivability at best in reality .

    • @wumaobot
      @wumaobot ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Vietnam and Taliban were the strongest

  • @jamesroberts1655
    @jamesroberts1655 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Love the long vids. Keeping my Bluetooth in all day at work...

  • @evilfingersNo1
    @evilfingersNo1 ปีที่แล้ว +213

    The only way to actually sink a US Supercarrier is with either Godzilla or the Decepticons

  • @willng247
    @willng247 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Love these Hollywood Top Gun commercials. Meanwhile the US carrier fleet has retreated to the second island chain 😂😂😂

    • @MAN_MAN730
      @MAN_MAN730 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Laugh 😃 now cry 😢 later.

  • @scottylindsay8506
    @scottylindsay8506 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This video was a godsend during the midnight shift 🙏

  • @johnsilver9338
    @johnsilver9338 ปีที่แล้ว +78

    Ford carrier has a better sortie rate. Even the older Nimitz can launch more aircraft at the same time than China's Type 003 Fujian. While the smaller "lighting carrier" Wasp and America class assault ships can have the same sortie rate with F-35Bs.

    • @Ezekiel903
      @Ezekiel903 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      don't forget, Chinese carrier needs two days before it can leave the port, the engines needs 48 hours to have produced enough energy! And US carrier can launch all ca.40 seconds a plane!

    • @LinksBetweenDrinks
      @LinksBetweenDrinks ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The idea of the Type 3 being comparable to the Ford is honestly just silly. The Type 3 is already hilariously antiquated. It runs on World War 2 technology. It's adorable.
      The Ford can clear an entire complement of the world's most ridiculously advanced aircraft before any Chinese vessel could get its pants on.

    • @dreamingflurry2729
      @dreamingflurry2729 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@LinksBetweenDrinks Ok, not WW2...but close, the best comparison should IMHO be the Forestals (or maybe - but that's stretching it - the Kitty-Hawks!), so conventionally powered carriers built after WW2 and retired in the early 2000s (Kitty-Hawk being the last in 2009!)

    • @MASMIWA
      @MASMIWA ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@LinksBetweenDrinks Oh? The Ford has a EMALS problem with it reached about 15% of design predictions before it crapped out. Media reports that the US Navy says it will be 2025 before it gets fixed. Hmm?
      "Aboard the USS Ford, the electromagnetic aircraft launch system (EMALS) continues to disappoint. On average, the electromagnetic catapult fails every 614 cycles-a measly fifteen percent of the Navy's target of 4,166 aircraft launches, or “mean cycles between operational mission failures (MCBOMF)”.Jan 25, 2023 (Forbes)
      BTW, the blast shields also appear to be defective. Deck crew are toast.

    • @yiquny
      @yiquny 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@LinksBetweenDrinksType 3's catapult system is second to none, FYI

  • @Tankplays8711
    @Tankplays8711 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    I love these videos they are so entertaining to watch

  • @AttackACactus
    @AttackACactus ปีที่แล้ว +15

    I love America. Thanks America for being American. ❤

  • @kendarley7501
    @kendarley7501 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I listen to these right when I lay down to nap. Puts me right to sleep.

  • @bo45
    @bo45 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    I'm thinking the USN will use the 003's for target practice.
    I'm not really seeing the 003's as much of a threat.

  • @Eric-uq4ny
    @Eric-uq4ny 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I love the 3hr vids. Perfect to help fall asleep at night. Sometimes when I’m dreaming I can hear the commentary in my dream

  • @tlip3480
    @tlip3480 ปีที่แล้ว +56

    You can't have the worlds largest defense budget without a bad guy to fight.

    • @Usernam321
      @Usernam321 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      And if there isn’t one, you can always fund one and wait 20 years. But as an engineer for a defense contractor, I do thank these bad guys for their disservice.

    • @Shineon83
      @Shineon83 ปีที่แล้ว

      China has a LOT of “enemies” (and yes, CHINA’S defense budget is far bigger than the U.S,)

    • @DavidHalko
      @DavidHalko ปีที่แล้ว +8

      A nation can have the highest defense budget in the world, as long as there are many small bad guys.
      Recently, China’s navy received and ignored multiple SOS distress calls in the Middle East, to terrorists & pirates respectively, violating international laws of the seas.
      China demonstrated China is impotent & incapable of acting by like a good international actor against pirates & terrorists.
      China’s inability to answer international SOS calls demonstrates someone has to be able to respond to terrorism & pirates, and that means the US is thanked by hundreds of nations around the world for having large military budget.

    • @solarion9802
      @solarion9802 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@DavidHalko Go go world police! Meanwhile the US is the most indebted entity in world history. That's $32 trillion and counting that will never be repaid.

    • @donovanulrich348
      @donovanulrich348 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      😅 let's be real, America would still spend that money on defense like Rome would 😂
      Having someone in second keeps us on our toes, and keeps us honest.

  • @janniemeyer9951
    @janniemeyer9951 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great graphics

  • @Steelythestacker
    @Steelythestacker 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Being conventionally powered I have my doubts at how well the Electronic catapults on the type 3 will work. Will they be able to power all ship systems at full power including propulsion, radars, weapons, electronic warfare, ect. While launching one let alone two or three planes at a time? I seriously have my doubts.

  • @futueplays4051
    @futueplays4051 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    idk what it is but i can only fall asleep when something I'm interested in listening to is on, and his voice just makes it that much easier

  • @marcr9410
    @marcr9410 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Perfect on the spot in a short video. Listening on my way to work on the other side of the country

  • @AnnaAnna428
    @AnnaAnna428 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Who else wakes up to these type of videos?

  • @randallraszick6001
    @randallraszick6001 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This is a good installment. Well done.

  • @newadventures9940
    @newadventures9940 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Inforgraphics thank you

  • @GhostRyderFPV
    @GhostRyderFPV ปีที่แล้ว +55

    USNS Concord - the fueler the Kitty Hawk was tied to mostly during UNREPs while we were... adjusting the topography of Iraq and Afghanistan.
    Thanks for the gas!
    But a problem with your statement about these support vessels, and how nuke carriers don't need them: There _IS_ an Air Wing aboard, and they run on JP5.

    • @ZairuK9001
      @ZairuK9001 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      And 5000 very hungry people.

    • @crazestyle83
      @crazestyle83 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      They still need food and other supplies as well

  • @jacobdisioux
    @jacobdisioux ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome content!

  • @barryklinedinst6233
    @barryklinedinst6233 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    The US has running carriers down to a science. Im sure accidents happen that we never here about. But those folks that run things on a carrier do a super job

    • @howiescott5865
      @howiescott5865 ปีที่แล้ว

      For every success there could be 100 failures. Nobody talks about that but it's a reality... and the Chinese think they can surpass the US in the near future. The BEST scientist and engineers live and work in the US. They come from China Russia, India, Taiwan and other countries all around the world. Why? Because it's a free country and it pays better... waaaay better... the best only run with the best. Chengdu or Sukhoi thinks they can beat Lockheed? 🤣🤣🤣🤣 That's only one example.

  • @kcsvantasticvoyages9729
    @kcsvantasticvoyages9729 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Good Luck with that, ex Navy on the Nimitz here

  • @joshuaholder6818
    @joshuaholder6818 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I would love to see the Ford I bet it’s massive to see

  • @BeastinOnLife
    @BeastinOnLife 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Much better than Huberman. This content is very interesting to wake up to.

  • @muzikizfun
    @muzikizfun ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Okay, let's assume for a minute that the 003 is well equipped and meets Nimitz rather than the Ford. Now it's the oldest against the newest carrier. While the fortunes of war will on rare occasions, favor the weaker over the stronger (think Midway), that is generally not the case. The Chinese would be at a severe disadvantage against the US Navy. The Americans have over 100 years of experience of operating carriers, and have used their carriers thousands of times to attack enemies. Okay, let's do a check here and ask how many times have the Chinese used their carriers against an enemy (the wind blows across the hot desert while we wait for the Chinese guy to think of a lie to save face)? The answer, of course, is zero! Now, let's assume both carriers suffer hits and damage control is working feverishly to put out the fires. Which Navy has ships that have been built tough from actual war experience, and which Navy doesn't know how to deal with battle damage? In the end the 003 will be on the bottom, while the Nimitz will lick her wounds as her repair crews get planes quickly back into the air and clear the ocean of foolish Chinese admirals that thought they were a match for the US Navy.

  • @patrickocallaghan4141
    @patrickocallaghan4141 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Really nice voice. That's what's its all about. David Attenborough good

  • @bo45
    @bo45 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    The US military, without a doubt. Has the biggest toy box.

    • @Aw3someGYE
      @Aw3someGYE ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Which today is probably the most important part in a war, as well as supply, which they're also the best at

    • @Nempo13
      @Nempo13 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Well, that depends. Russia has the biggest toy box in numbers...it is just all very antiquated equipment that hasn't had any maintenance. The only reason they haven't been thrown out of Ukraine is due to this. They are absolute hoarders and have HUGE stockpiles all over.
      The US has the biggest toy box in currently useful, updated, and maintained equipment with a vast array of usefulness.

    • @jcole3217
      @jcole3217 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      IMO, the American people don't even really know everything our military has and what is really capable of.

    • @johntang4108
      @johntang4108 ปีที่แล้ว

      US navy got the most expensive stuff in this planet, by sailing all of them in the ocean can make US bankrupt. China should do nothing, stay calm and watch till the game is over.

  • @S3L0Licant
    @S3L0Licant 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I’m from Arunachal Pradesh and was stunned when he mentioned my state 😅

  • @reggiefurlow1
    @reggiefurlow1 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    Everybody knows how to fight until they get punched in the face

  • @alvinmanuel3120
    @alvinmanuel3120 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Some of these are interesting but some help me sleep

  • @robertbenoit5374
    @robertbenoit5374 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    US Navy has Air superiority. China doesn't have the real world experience or combat experience. Plus I can bet one thing the US Navy has a huge advantage that China doesn't have, Our Naval Aviators are trained to fly by instruments which means we don't need daylight to fly. A huge advantage over anyone. We learned our lessons well thanks to the Japanese Imperial Navy teaching us this hard lesson starting with when they brought us into WWII. It was brought to the attention of the power that be that we needed to learn precision bombing and increase carrier forces 5 years before the attack on Pearl Harbor. At the time we had a formidable Navy with lots of ships, and a pretty big Army as well. That is how we fought our wars until that point, we didn't focus on the air, shoot we didn't even have an air force that was run by the Army. The powers in charge disagreed with the information presented to them, a decision that would haunt the Navy on December 7, 1941. After the attack on Pearl Harbor, Military strategy changed and the realization that we needed to learn precision bombing was proven by the Japanese. IT is one of the reasons why our pilots and Naval Aviators are trained the way that they are. I am sure in a few years the Chinese will become a formidable opponent but right now, they are still learning and building. I wouldn't say they are not a threat but they have a lot to learn.

  • @loler_1212
    @loler_1212 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I had such a nice sleep, i watched the whole video while sleeping and idek a single word that was in it

  • @OGPotterhead77
    @OGPotterhead77 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    bruh 3 HOURS
    WHO WILL WATCH THIS ENTIRE THING
    also, FIFTH YAY!

  • @kevoseddo4064
    @kevoseddo4064 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    How many iterations of this video have you guys made? It’s at least a dozen in the last year

  • @fitzyholden1036
    @fitzyholden1036 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I'd be impressed if China's carrier made it out of their territorial waters without breaking down. And unlike what they claim, thats not very far at all.

    • @mhammer3186
      @mhammer3186 ปีที่แล้ว

      It’s funny how what ever claims China or Russia make about their weapons is always far greater than what they can actually do and the western powers claims are always way less than what they can actually do.

  • @steelmerc
    @steelmerc 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Don't touch the boats! A lesson every nation that ever touched a US warship has learned.

    • @BCBoost420
      @BCBoost420 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What about Isreal?

  • @SamHam42
    @SamHam42 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Regardless, the US has been investing those amounts for decades and china just started being able to, and the catch up they have done in technology has come from thievery and espionage rather than through experience and hard work. Good luck on the upgrades C

    • @howiescott5865
      @howiescott5865 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      There's no substitute for experience, time and lots of it, dedication, hard work and countless failures to build final success.

    • @lamarcalewarts1155
      @lamarcalewarts1155 ปีที่แล้ว

      I agree

    • @kenwu528
      @kenwu528 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Are you kidding? Since when have thievery and espionage not become part of art of war? Silly rabbit.

    • @donovanulrich348
      @donovanulrich348 ปีที่แล้ว

      If China was any threat, they would start helping in international arbitration and abiding international law. Or declaring war when their sovereignty was challenged.
      They are a paper tiger, but they can play pretend 😂
      When China starts helping on the global stage, and seemingly not self interested. That's when you worry 😂

    • @MrObvious-tg8lz
      @MrObvious-tg8lz ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ​@@kenwu528If you are the first to develop a technology, then you can't steal what doesn't exist...

  • @james_l4337
    @james_l4337 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This helps me to space out, relax

  • @b21raider27
    @b21raider27 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Type 003 is good but still nowhere near US super carriers (Ford, Nimitz).
    Doesn’t have a nuclear reactor.
    Much smaller number of aircraft onboard: US up to 90 per super carrier, Type 003 over 40.

    • @k.k.c8670
      @k.k.c8670 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Nuclear reactor isn't absolutely necessary as long as range is enough and it can power all its needs. As for number of aircraft, it it cause China uses j15 which is a heavy (large) fighter. When the j31/35 is ready, they will fit a lot more on the carrier cause it is much smaller.

    • @donovanulrich348
      @donovanulrich348 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ​@@k.k.c8670the reason a nuclear plant is needed
      Is to reduce supply chain links in a war
      A Ford class carrier only needs food, troops and planes
      The 003 needs designated fuel tanks, to power itself. Then the same supplies you need to fight

    • @k.k.c8670
      @k.k.c8670 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@donovanulrich348 sure but like I said, China's aircraft carriers are not traveling very far out from China itself (compared to US carriers). In any case, China is currently building a nuclear powered flat deck (type 004/005). At the moment, only Us and France have nuclear powered carriers

  • @MonsterHDE
    @MonsterHDE 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I also wonder how subs will come into play during engaments between aircraft carriers. I know you have made videos on the Subs but just so crazy to think how close some of these scenes are from coming to real life. Dangerous time. Shoutout from Minnesota, USA. I am headed into the Coast Guard, wonder what will happen with that in the future

  • @djmcmenus5211
    @djmcmenus5211 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    How old is this? India has surpassed the population of China, China is no longer the most populated country. In fact, their birth rate has drastically decreased with no births in a recent three month period of time.

    • @kenik2023
      @kenik2023 ปีที่แล้ว

      They are getting a LOT of facts wrong. Ex: SE Asia was trading with the U.S. during Trump, Biden cut them off😂

  • @johnstoddard4692
    @johnstoddard4692 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    If only this information wasn't so incredibly biased and incorrect, I would agree that it is the best in its class.

  • @jacobgraves3505
    @jacobgraves3505 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Haha. This is like buying a carrier off of wish

  • @youandiryan
    @youandiryan 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Woke up to this

  • @rodgerfruin
    @rodgerfruin ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Its a contest to see how many times they can say the same thing.

  • @jehanc
    @jehanc 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You got the correct name for the strait which is Malacca Strait and not Melaka Strait.

  • @scottfarrell7974
    @scottfarrell7974 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Hey China do you really want to find out the hard way that Tesla's death ray is now mobile not to mention

  • @hahnniger645
    @hahnniger645 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Just woke up and was thinking of aircraft carriers

  • @AndreVanDiggelen-wl3fx
    @AndreVanDiggelen-wl3fx ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Lets also point out that Chinese jets have to launch with just a few weapins and half the fuel as they are extremely underpowered. Just like Russia

    • @howiescott5865
      @howiescott5865 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Russia can make better weapons that don't work but China can make them cheaper. 😂

    • @kenwu528
      @kenwu528 ปีที่แล้ว

      Are you stuck in WW2 mentality? Why send a jet to do what guided missiles launch from a destroyer can do cheaper and better? Between super powers, Jets are toys for peace time muscle flexing. Life expectancy of any jet are a one way trip during war. The moment its weapons bay are open it will be locked by multiple guided missiles.

    • @vukanilogistics3759
      @vukanilogistics3759 ปีที่แล้ว

      Lll)lllllllllll

    • @ayreface1
      @ayreface1 ปีที่แล้ว

      He said that in the video lol

  • @james_l4337
    @james_l4337 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Good Chat AI generated script make a soft muisc helps calm military buffs

  • @EpicLoLs89
    @EpicLoLs89 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I like how a lot of these videos down play how badly USA would dominate. Never let the enemy know your real power.

  • @CoachSMETAGaming
    @CoachSMETAGaming 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    my dreams be wild thanks to these vids lolol

  • @dave311281
    @dave311281 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Nuclear Powered or not, does not mean they don't need a dedicated oiler, where do you think the jet fuel comes from and the food to feed 1000's of personal...

    • @Shyhalu
      @Shyhalu ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Magic. Anyway, better question is where does he think the Uranium comes from? We don't mine much of it anymore and we're not exactly liked on the world stage.

    • @martinwarford1389
      @martinwarford1389 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@Shyhalu I know huh? Those reactors constantly need uranium shoveled in them to keep working. When the uranium onboard gets low or runs out the carrier will have to hook up to a uranium tanker ship or find a port has uranium refueling facilities.
      🙄

    • @Shyhalu
      @Shyhalu ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@martinwarford1389 You understand what a spent fuel rod is, right?
      Engine maintenance.....etc?
      Or do you also think Nuclear plants just magically produce power forever?

    • @martinwarford1389
      @martinwarford1389 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Shyhalu @Shyhalu Yeah I understand. I also understand that deployed carriers aren't at risk of their rods being spent, they don't send them out with "the needle on the E". They plan years ahead for the refueling process and so if one was even headed in to be refueld/overhauled the process could be delayed if unexpected world events warranted it. No country is gonna catch a US carrier slipping, at sea afloat listless and vulnerable because lack of nuclear fuel for propulsion or operation of defensive and offensive weapons. As for the availability of uranium, I'm also sure they've planned ahead to have enough stockpiled for what is needed at least in the short term. They're not waiting for the carriers or subs to be a few weeks away from returning to port and then deciding to go out to Walmart and buy some. And two of the biggest uranium producers Australia and Canada are tight allies with us. They don't have as much as Kazakhstan but they have it.

  • @sapphicgeek24
    @sapphicgeek24 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    The world really has forgotten what happens when you touch our boats. Do. Not. Touch. Our. Boats.

  • @leoforsberg2359
    @leoforsberg2359 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Coudent a swedish submarine sink those? think i saw a video on that

    • @iainstanley2228
      @iainstanley2228 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Swedish sub was able to get through the anti sub screening vessels into firing position, don't know if it would have sunk the carrier or not but it definitely would have damaged it

  • @maximoreeves2199
    @maximoreeves2199 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    How many drones fit on a carrier? They dont metion this at all, its hard to believe there's not 100s of drones on board as well.

    • @kevinking5406
      @kevinking5406 ปีที่แล้ว

      Currently the Navy flies a drone tanker.

  • @brobo121
    @brobo121 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I swear i watched this video already

  • @Soultaker115
    @Soultaker115 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    very good work. fair to all . china is that 12 year old fortnite player who dominates due to watching tons of youtube videos of others playing fortnite. catching up quick but i just simply want peace with everyone. why are we fighting? make robots and lets go explore universe and create immortality

    • @Keenemovie
      @Keenemovie ปีที่แล้ว

      I feel like being immortal would drive everyone insane and ultimately be the downfall

    • @kevinking5406
      @kevinking5406 ปีที่แล้ว

      Obama was attempting the TPP. The Trans Pacific Partnership. It had a security component to it. We would basically train with smaller Asian countries to counter China. GUESS WHO KILLED THAT IDEA when he got elected

    • @fightfish3265
      @fightfish3265 ปีที่แล้ว

      There's a BIG difference in lessons learned from observing, and real world experience.

  • @stevehoogenakker9619
    @stevehoogenakker9619 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'm being sleep hypnotized and I like it

  • @The_Bobby_Jay
    @The_Bobby_Jay ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Wait wait wait. The last European power with any influence on this side of the world? Spain? Isn’t Canada a commonwealth country under the British commonwealth? I could be mistaken.

  • @torccchaser6712
    @torccchaser6712 ปีที่แล้ว

    Bring it ....................

  • @RagsHSC-7
    @RagsHSC-7 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I'm quite sure China has watched thousands of hours of carrier ops of the US and the UK and a few others. It is an art. It takes people who love what they do. From the deck crew and air marshal to the Ouija board to the mini boss then to the air boss. It is a concert. The bare minimum is launching an aircraft every 30 seconds ! Trapping an aircraft every 45 seconds ! Turn around time 10 minutes ! We do it faster and better than that. The USN carrier and strike group. I do believe China has had a lot of time watching with patience learning with patients. China will be no joke, that's for sure. They're only hope would be to take out our carriers. That goes both ways ! Just because the limitations of the Accord limits the amount of carriers don't think for one second the US does not have 3 fold in reserve. I'm not a warmonger. I don't want war. I don't believe Ming wants it either. They cannot even claim Taiwan has China territory just saying so doesn't make it so. Nor does saying the ocean belongs to China. That was the silliest thing I ever heard. We knew that they were dredging and building islands. The natural Islands of volcanoes were first come first served. Whoever claimed it named it. China has a lot of money and if their doctrine in defense and offense was of Japan in world war II. There will be a battle. I truly believe they're waiting for the right moment when they believe that we are thinned out between Ukraine and Israel. But they know without doubt we have more to bring to the fight. Nobody wants war. I surely don't. But those are the facts. God bless you all 🕊️🕊️🕊️

    • @Ezekiel903
      @Ezekiel903 ปีที่แล้ว

      agree, but at the moment it is more probable that China is collapsing from the inside as that it will collapse bcs of war!

    • @markberta9241
      @markberta9241 ปีที่แล้ว

      real asf

  • @jevanlessie9856
    @jevanlessie9856 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    No pause Is wild

  • @minecraftthing428
    @minecraftthing428 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    why is this vid 3 hours long 💀

    • @Chris-es3wf
      @Chris-es3wf ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Bc that's about how long the Chinese carriers would survive in a war 🤣

    • @KilledByThatTrain
      @KilledByThatTrain ปีที่แล้ว

      It's a compilation video

  • @MattttG3
    @MattttG3 ปีที่แล้ว

    21:55-22:02 🤣 🤣 🤣 “the Hog” 😆 made me laugh out loud, I have never heard you mispronounce anything that comes to mind

  • @scottfarrell7974
    @scottfarrell7974 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    The Gerald Ford can launch planes with the slingshot and slow them down with a magnetic field you do realize that according to Einstein's unified field theory this could also be used as a force field to protect the entire Gerald Ford not to mention the laser weapons it's carrying

    • @fightfish3265
      @fightfish3265 ปีที่แล้ว

      The Ford uses arresting gear. It's a new system, but built off an existing one.

    • @KH4444444444N
      @KH4444444444N ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Correct.

  • @ryanlindley6476
    @ryanlindley6476 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    HEY, LAKE,
    WHAT DIFFERENTIAL OIL SHOULD I USE IN MY FORD CROWN VIC POLICE INTERCEPTOR ? CAN YOU RECOMMEND A PRODUCT ? MAYBE SOMETHING THAT WOULD BE LIKE THE DIF VERSION OF VALVOLINE RESTORE AND PROTECT ?

  • @MarkBarrett
    @MarkBarrett ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I just heard "China engine company".
    I immediately started shaking my head.
    I would never ride on a plane made with that.

  • @Kushy4420
    @Kushy4420 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Who else listens while at work

  • @peterdagnese453
    @peterdagnese453 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Is this a joke?

  • @SpacedT63
    @SpacedT63 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I keep waking up to these

  • @fletcherjacobs3688
    @fletcherjacobs3688 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    @TheInfographicsShow i I had an idea for a video. What sized speed and composition and trajectory of an asteroid impact on the moon get it to spin then vary the factors to have it spin at different speeds also the after effect of moon debris being spit out from impact

  • @abhishekdas8026
    @abhishekdas8026 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Bro labelled Ladakh in the middle of Jharkhand in 19:42. 🤦🏾‍♂️
    P.S. Not hating. Absolutely love this channel’s content and binge it for hours. But had to point out this inconsistency considering no one else did.

  • @kenshinflyer
    @kenshinflyer ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Match? yeah, right. The Gerald Ford will simply pummel the Fujian into submission with its insane endurance.

    • @KH4444444444N
      @KH4444444444N ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Wait until HHI unleashes the Enterprise...

  • @SteinsReality
    @SteinsReality ปีที่แล้ว

    This is great to keep my dogs with noise!

  • @whydoyouwanttoknow4464
    @whydoyouwanttoknow4464 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    If China was able to take out a Carrier. The United States would go from 2 million Troops to 20 million troops.

  • @greenmountainpokemon2112
    @greenmountainpokemon2112 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    3:58 those LRAMS are an incredibly dangerous missile!

  • @wickitklown90
    @wickitklown90 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I helped build that boat. Can't wait to see how she'll perform in battle.

  • @RobertGilles-t4v
    @RobertGilles-t4v 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Yes we do

  • @miek99
    @miek99 ปีที่แล้ว

    China is like the kid in class who copies your work in a test.

  • @sawgunn69
    @sawgunn69 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow,this did not show up in my feed,i.e. Notifications, an yes I have "All" selected ,hmmmmmmmmmm

  • @aryogono6338
    @aryogono6338 ปีที่แล้ว

    Relevant content to the video title is only until 14:08. The rest is non related and can be skipped. No need to watch the whole 3 hours.

  • @Switcharoo12
    @Switcharoo12 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why the carriers going backwards?

  • @nunya___
    @nunya___ 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    0:53 Why are both these guys talking at the same time?

  • @matthewfrank2498
    @matthewfrank2498 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The water graphics always makes it look like things are going backwards, what is up with that?

  • @JeffY-y3z
    @JeffY-y3z 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    why are the ships in these videos always sailing backwards?

  • @kimdani1795
    @kimdani1795 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why is a ABtam tanks dlisplayed😊inmoscow😊

  • @Flowshow88
    @Flowshow88 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Imagine seeing a missile coming your way and on it a sticker that says "Made In China" 😅

  • @futurecat
    @futurecat 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Messing with our boats will bring unlucky fortune cookies.

  • @alteregos3891
    @alteregos3891 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is like asking me if i got brand new golf clubs, could I beat a PGA Tour player.