ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 6 เม.ย. 2014
- A look inside the strategies and rules of three-team soccer, which has three goals, evolving loyalties and a philosophical origin.
More FIFA Futbol Mundial videos:
• FIFA Futbol Mundial
Subscribe to FIFA on TH-cam to stay updated on daily releases:
th-cam.com/users/subscription_c...
More videos from FIFA on TH-cam:
/ fifa - กีฬา
the only thing that didn't happen was how 3-sided football works
true
what do you mean, they explained it, its like a normal game but with three nets and the team with the leaste amount of goals scored against them wins
im really confused , i just explained how it works, and i get a lecture on socialism ? and your girl? what is this.
callum Thompson 😂😂😂😂😂😂
3nglish Elusive lol your comment has nothing to do with anything, not even with socialism.
Mercedes-Benz Productplacement?
+LetsPLayYesterday
LOLZ, i was just thinking the same :P
LetsPLayYesterday if
This would be a brilliant way to train well-rounded midfielders especially the defensive aspect.
I prefer normal football but this might still be fun between friends. Nothing I would watch in a world cup though.
Actually, the first three-way soccer match was televised on October 28, 1978, on the Laff-A-Lympics. I don't recall the exact score, but the Scooby Doobies and Yogi Yahooeys tied for the win over the Really Rottens. True.
😂😂😂
I was there go scoobies!
And all of this coming from an indoor soccer fan. You know your soccer (go Wave)
+DallasHammster you're probably wrong.
DallasHammster you're probably wrong.
How 3-sided football works.
It doesn't.
Wot?, if u watch the video then it does
I'd love for this to become a proper professional sport. Even if it becomes one of those smaller sports that you'd watch at the Olympics and forget about after
what if two weaker teams gang up on a much stronger team?
+cerealkiller That's kind of the beauty of three-sided football. Alliances can be easily forged in a non-linear game.
The rules should then be changed so that every team could only score against the team on their right. Then two teams couldn't team up together.
+Kay Horn
The only reason that looks like a problem to you is because you don't understand how this game works.
In your senerio, it's not Team C who would get that point, it's Team B.
You get points by being scored on, not by scoring goals, so the team with the fewest points wins.
-
In other words, in your senerio, it doesn't matter that it was a C player who scored, both Team A and Team C are helped by that goal.
Kay Horn
"1 team is either doing nothing because they are leading, and the losing team will just get bullied til the end of the game."
-
That's literally the opposite of what would happen. It only takes a basic understanding of strategy to realize that the two losing teams would team up to take on the winning team.
Kay Horn
Is it possible for you make a comment without mindlessly insulting me? Is it possible for us to just have a mature disscusssion about this? Is that a thing you're capable of?
-
Anyway: no. The team in second place should NOT team up with the winning team.
By teaming up with the losing team, the second place team will be able to dethrone the winning team.
-
If you're in second and you team up with the winning team, you're just helping your opponent win. It's literally the dumbest play you can make.
-
Let me break down who you should team up with:
Team A is winning
Team B is in second
Team C is losing
-
Team A would, ideally, want to team up with Team C to extend their lead over B.
-
Team B would, ideally, want to team up with Team C to catch up with Team A.
-
Team C has a choice: do they want to improve their chances of taking second, or do they want to make the game more even all around making it easier for them to eventually take first, but less likely to quickly take second.
If the former, then they'd want to team up with A, if the later then they'd want to team up with B.
-
If A and B are tied:
Both A and B want to team up with C, and C's choice is very situational.
-
If B and C are tied:
B and C should team up to make sure A doesn't run away with the game. A would settle for an alliance with either team.
-
If everyone is tied:
Very situational and there's no way to answer who should team up with who without knowing anything else about the game.
All I can say is... don't fix it if it ain't broke
+Wilson Scientifical (DominatorX) you just made my day
***** no he said the quote wrong, and i corrected him
+johnathan1784 I don't see it as a "fix", but rather an improvement of the original idea, to give it another perspective and (who knows?) maybe a more entertaining and exciting turn to the game (we could play this style when there are 3 teams wanting to play, and we want them all to join the game, so, why not?).
An example of this statement are smartphones. The original principle wasn't broken, and after an incredible development, cellphones were made. And with that, eventually someone added the features that now allow us to have such incredible technology in our hands. Say, we still have phones and cellphones, but the improved principle is what made different the whole thing, the whole society. It's kinda exaggerated, but in a certain matter correct.
If it's broke I didn't fix it
The Guy 😂😂😂
A good training exercise and fun but nothing more
Benswan187 what more fo you need
that would be better with only player per team and a really little field...or maximum 2 players per team...
with that giant field and so many player it's just a big mess...
dubididubidi that would be bad cause you had to choose whether or not to go on offense or stay defensive, if you if A and B where attacking C than B went rouge and just shot it into A's goal than A would be punished for attacking
Fun but not for competitive sports, I think. It will be hard to have the winner and I think it will involve grudge against the other team to decide which team they should attack.
"Who needs Europe?" Said an Englishman
He said "Who needs Brazil?".......but I get what you wanna say. xD
KumaKamu The world needs Europe!
Farage?
Djprojectus nah not really
This belongs on a playground and not a stadium
+VStrizzy why? because you dont like it?
It's because I do like it and I don't want to go to Europe to play such a fun playground game
+busTedOaS then you go play it. want a medal for being open minded?
Dave Kent
nah im good, I just don't like people proclaiming where something "belongs".
This seems stupid I prefer running having more than 5 team mates and passion in soccer not this crap
Mercedes Benz like that.
We were playing a four sided version of this in the streets of Nairobi back when I was a kid. We had four goals and four players. Concede a goal and your out and another player comes in...
Albert Mathenge habari za azubuhi
When I was a child I saw 4 sided football in my dream, I never thought it would be a thing it was like 2 football fields next to each other and teams had to score in the oppsed direction and the far goal like the letter x
(Thank you for reading and sorry for my english )
im from malaysia but ive never heard of 3 sided football before and now they're telling me we're entering the world cup? meh, thats probably the only world cup that we're qualified to join.
DarrenTrills standard melayu
DarrenTrills
Same with Bulgaria From 94 to now
Melayu La Ni
this is a cool concept, not saying it should replace regular soccer but its like how in basketball there are games like horse, knockout, around the world, 21, etc, should just be played amongst friends pretty much like different variations of basketball
I agree, this should be a thing like futsal and beach soccer, but it's not replacing normal football
It should be on a playground
In my opinion, This game is not interesting to watch on TV
I've seen this video. It is more than enough.
Would be fun as hell to play though.
They were experimenting with 3-sided Aussie Rules in Melbourne, Australia a few years ago too.
Five things I want to see tried:
5. Massive double sized pitch, 22 a-side! Epic battles to advance up-field! I imagine players like Bale would be a huge asset!
4. Normal 11 a-side but with 2 balls in play at one time. You can be defending and attacking simultaneously, tricky for TV coverage! You would need to have one ref that follows each ball, each ball would be a different colour. Imagine if they had it in the 90's, you could have had Beckham lining up a free kick at one end, whilst somewhere else on the pitch Keane is getting sent off for stamping on a guy, you wouldn't know where to look! You might even have a situation where both sides score simultaneously with home and away fans all celebrating! Trippy shit.
3. No goal keepers but smaller goals and you've got to shoot from outside the box, still high scoring! You might have to make a circular or round ended box rather than square!
2. Regular 11 a-side but on a circular pitch, offside's would be hard to adjudicate! Or you could use a cricket oval, you might need again more than 11 a side!
1. Or most ambitious, eight sided pitch, 4 goals evenly spaced, 2 teams, lights above each goal, 2 lights off, one on... red, one on blue, your team have to target a certain colour, they change at random, you might be advancing in on goal and suddenly it becomes the one you are defending and your goal keepers is miles out of position! OK that is too far, might not work!
I've played with the small net- no shooting inside box game. It was good fun. Really improves accuracy.
paulmrussell12 all fun but not entertaining to watch on the television, like rugby it's boring to watch but hella fun to play
paulmrussell12 combine 5 4 and 1
dominik matić how are you gonna combine them may I ask?
Enes Kücükakin 44 players 2 balls and goal switching
You know what would be cool, is a football match in a concave bowl-shaped pitch. The goals would have to be at an angle facing downwards.
The comments here typifies the stupidity of the TH-cam community. There's no way three-sided football is going to replace conventional football. It's just a very fun, new, much more tactical way of playing football. Calm down, they won't replace anything.
This won't work. In three sided games the weakest team will always be struck down be the combined powers of the two others.
It's just bad game design.
The team who concedes the least wins, so you need to somehow which allegiances half way through.
Chad Nitrofix Yeah but during the game you'd need to score against the other strong game to win.
amapolishplummer , I see your point. Sure, I agree that it is a fun game to play with friends and there will be mindgames near the end of the play to make it exciting , what my claim is that, it is just plain unfair for one team even when they possess a quality squad. The game could be twisted to unfavourable conditions for one team even if they have the strongest players. They would lack the man power to come against the allied teams, it is just plain unfair for a team with better players to lose for the terms of the game. Like you said, to win it could be a fair contest, but to lose one of the teams could get slammed anytime no matter what skills they have thus making the game a two team contest.
If you like I'd like to present a scenario:
Argentina, Spain and Italy are playing the game. And Spain and Italy could join forces and trash Argentina from the beginning and make the score Arg(-6)Spn(0)Italy(0) at halftime, and then as the latter half develops its just a contest between Italy and Spain, leaving Argentina with no hope. The game could be played with equality only by the will of all players which is impossible in terms of real life. Its just not professional sports, may be for reality tv, but not professional sports.
I should look into the rules of this again. ^^
Very nice replies. I of course simplified it carelessly in my first comment.
Taxtro Why would that be in the interest of the two other teams? The team who *concedes* the least goals wins, so it is in either of the two stronger teams' interest to betray their allied team after a goal is scored against the weaker team. Otherwise the game would lead only to a draw for the two strongest teams. Knowing that one of the two stronger teams will attempt a betrayal, the third team could attempt to curry favour by promising an alliance with one of the two stronger teams when the betrayal occurs. However an alliance also puts them in a good position for their own betrayal. It can get quite complex.
It would be cool if this wer like special games, like if the Méxican Super Clásico would be Cruz Azul vs. América vs. Chivas. Or maybe 4-way, that way Pumas could also be a part. But only for special occasions like that, but not for every game. I like the traditional games we have today.
You can do some changes in rules such as bigger goals and 2 goalkeepers from different teams on each goal. Your team must score only in one goal (with 2 enemy GK). For example. It'll bring more balance in game.
There used to be a training exercise game a bit similar. But between individuals. Each person would defend a goal made of two sticks. Those goals would form a circle in which they played.
Next up: Fifa:Battle Royale
With the addition of the UEFA Europa Conference League, the 2021/22 UEFA Super Cup will be played like this 👍
3 sided football: longer tradition than RB Leipzig
This looks really fun!
Random Guy On TH-cam no
we play this at my clubs practices sometimes, and we use three balls it's mental and so much fun
Imagine a professional three sided football match that has Liverpool and Man Utd players coordinating together against another team
the video title is completely misleading, the only thing they didn't explain was how 3-sided football work.
didn’t they? :D
4:03 Talks about big business in football on FIFA TV. What a guy :D
It's just great banter
It shouldn't be fewest goals conceded or most scored, but goal differential, each team's goals scored minus goals conceded. That way teams don't gang up on another team or teams don't play all defense.
I thought of this concept when I was 7 years old, Now I'm 14.
I thought that the pitch should have a 1.5 times larger area, but a circle, and the goals should be kept 1/3 of the pitch apart from each other.
id love to give this a try
Should try this idea in Finland really.
This idea is one of the best things I've ever heard about football!
I'd love to see this become more popular have professional teams play and be televised
This idea isn't going anywhere. It's stupid. Football will always be the same basic idea.
Com Lag I am. >:)
+Epic Will (SnakeSkinGaming) well its not like we have to choose one...
Are you dumb? This isn't suppose to replace normal football it's just s variation. You don't see anyone complaining about beach football or football tennis. Really, how dense can you be?
+Epic Will (SnakeSkinGaming)
"Football will always be the same basic idea."
This is not Football, it's 3-sided Football. Do you get the difference?
Tell that to FIFA
i would love to play on this dynamic!!
We need to try this here in Brazil. I imagine how the strategy should be so different. Please, where can we find a tutorial of the rules?
FIFA TV is the only place that has only their videos in the suggestions
Played it the other day it was great
I reckon it needs to be played indoors or on a turf with walls so that there are no outs. It's a decent idea though and I love the organised chaos.
I played this game when i was a kid. and i've never heard of this dude before
lol i play four-sided football at school. it's called Four Corners. like if you remember
Lol me too!! :)
haha yeah, we simply called it four goals - only allowed 2 touches of the ball to make it interesting
We're doing one-sided:
2 teams 5 players each
1 goal
Goalkeeper who isnt playing for any team and he has to just stop the balls (hes also the ref sometimes)
The team that scores the most into the goal wins, game is 35 minutes long.
A deflected goal can count for the other team, and also, its more interesting in a way,
because if you attack and you lost the ball, you dont run back to your goal, you start defending the same goal you were attacking before.
Its an easy way of getting a ref into an unorganized game at school.
Theres only 2 positions: Playmaker and Striker (strikers are also defenders if the team loses the ball).
It developed here after we were only 7th grade, and the other older guys took every other place on every "pitch", so we couldnt play on 2 goals.
2 sided football is more fun, but when you dont have enough players, really need a ref, have only 1 goal, or just want to differenciate and mix thing up a bit, that's the perfect option for you, as its more resource - light than 3 sided football.
Eliad Eyar Even better: One goal, neutral keeper, every man for himself
Joshua Ryan yeah but everyone does that :D
The team with the least goals conceded wins. So everytime one has fewer than the others, they gang up on him until its equal again.
Boring
what is first person passes to second in hopes that he will score against the third but scores against the first taking advantage?!
Maybe 3-sided football can be like Futsal in that it will help the players to develop thier skill and well,help them become better players in normal football.
This could be more fun to watch than normal football
That would be a great way to train three goalkeepers and do a good training for a big match.
The true way to do the super cup
In the beginning when the score board changes it gives red a point yet red was scored on
Damn, this has the potential to make me interested in football...
4-way, 2-ball, square pitch s is better with scoring the most goals AND having hockey-offsides rules on the territory boundaries.
Can't wait to see in UEFA SUPER CUP 2022
Cool exercise
so 2 teams can team up on the third and at last it will come back to 2 on 2 since both of them might have 0 goals in them which will make the game even longer
I always thought was the only genius that imagined about 3 sided football
I wanna see a match !!
No offsides? Fantastic! Finally, a version of Soccer I can get behind!
Ryan Woods what is soccer?
I would love Copa90 to do a video on 3 sided football
one word : Chaos
cool concept
shocking how serious they take themselves.
Im from glasgow!
very cool
Oh those situationists!
i would definitely play that game...
It's an interesting idea.
I think this is a cool concept. Too many people are set in their ways and refuse to acknowledge anything else.
2018 first time hearing of this
good idea
The problem is that if the winner is the team which conceds less goals, every one would play defensively, and if there's a draw between two of the teams, what do they do?
I dreamt about this as a kid
There's a saying, 'If it ain't broken, don't fix it.'
Football played the way it's played between 2 sides (the traditional way) is just perfect and that's how we like it. So no reason to come up with a strange and somewhat weird 3 sided football (although I must say the guy who came up with the 3 sided football does have an imaginative mind).
This is more a sort of indoor football affair.
Possible calling thats coach for informations of rules game .
how it comes that the video has 91 views and 120 likes? great video anyway
Seems interesting. I don't think it will get widely popular though. It's too complicated for that.
Nice one Mercedes.
what if you score an own goal?
It should be more like 5 sided pentagon style or hexagon
This is 5 alive!!!
OMG they did a three way!
bring this in world cup lol
Berkamp was the player of the tournament for me
Could do 4 sided football.
Sorts out a group stage in one go.
Or 48 sided football.
Sorts out the entire world cup in one go.
Joke.
Brilliant painter Asger Jorn.
Should be one that scores most, more exiting
What if 2 teams gang up against the other
that was what I was thinking
One team can beat two teams...
Rule of Neutrality
like in Chess for three players:
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three-player_chess
That’s the point of the game basically, you have to make temporary alliances
In Ghana, we have 4 sided football... We call it 4 corners.. It's pretty great
Mercedes - Benz would be the perfect sponsor. 0:10
Thats pretty cool
Lol... Really?? Where I'm from we have a game called Four Cornered Posts it's football but there are four goal posts... Small ones arranged like a +.
You we all have 100 points and if anyone scores in your goal you lose 10 points until youre out of points. Then it continues till only one person is left... It's a really fun way to pass the time while waiting for more people to join in for a match... The goal posts snot have to be huge.. You can use like boots or something as goal posts just put them opposite each other...