Goal-line technology put to the test

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 1.3K

  • @madrefx1269
    @madrefx1269 5 ปีที่แล้ว +200

    Recommended after 6 years. Why so early youtube?

    • @ZAGAD-i2x
      @ZAGAD-i2x 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Exactly I'm used to getting video recommendations from 2007, I'm very disappointed😡

    • @madrefx1269
      @madrefx1269 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@ZAGAD-i2x Me too

  • @fifa
    @fifa  11 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    Are you happy to have Goal-line technology in events and leagues?

    • @rodingoesboom
      @rodingoesboom 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yes I am.

    • @kwarijanuar6044
      @kwarijanuar6044 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes I am

    • @TechNaf
      @TechNaf 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Made the matches fair for both

    • @davidenatoh359
      @davidenatoh359 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      YESS...

    • @storywhatsapp3247
      @storywhatsapp3247 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      but in the Indonesian league there is no Video Assistant referee and Goal line technology

  • @teodorcotofan7462
    @teodorcotofan7462 5 ปีที่แล้ว +206

    TH-cam be like
    2014:no
    2015:no
    2016:no
    2017:not yet
    2018:next year
    2019:Let’d put it in everyone’s recomandation

  • @JBoy-pc9xm
    @JBoy-pc9xm 5 ปีที่แล้ว +750

    Who is here after VAR

  • @javiazar
    @javiazar 10 ปีที่แล้ว +849

    Great, now we need offside technology, and we're set. Assistant refs can just be there to help call the fouls and corners.

  • @shooter4a1
    @shooter4a1 9 ปีที่แล้ว +265

    Yeah, there should be offside technology, I never thought of that. One goal that happened in the FIFA WC 14- the player was offside and the ref didn't see that. And that caused them to win the match, which wasn't fair. FIFA needs offside technology, refs make bad calls or they don't make any calls at all.

    • @ricomajestic
      @ricomajestic 9 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      bjehulk So what? The correct decision is what matters!

    • @NailujG
      @NailujG 9 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Mexico vs Argentina WC 2010 Messi was CLEARLY offsides. Then the ref was in shock because he actually he admitted he messed up. Idk why they couldn't have taken off the goal

    • @shooter4a1
      @shooter4a1 9 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      +ricomajestic Excactly....it won't even take that long. It'll take less than 25 seconds. What are you talking about...it'll take too long? As long as they get it right-that's what matters!

    • @ricomajestic
      @ricomajestic 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      bjehulk...they can just do what is done in the NFL where a coach gets a limited number calls to be reviewed during a game. In soccer there could be a maximum of 2 review calls per team during an entire game. This would prevent repetitive stopping of the game. There is already technology that would review offside plays in real time and would not require the game to be stopped! Imagine how this could clean up the game. If a player is legitimately fouled or if he dives in the penalty area, the play could be reviewed by the 4th official and the correct call could be made. This might eliminate diving by players for fear of getting caught and receiving a red card!

    • @shooter4a1
      @shooter4a1 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +ricomajestic yeah.... THE CORRECT decision is what matters. If offside technology will avoid bad calls then why not have it?

  • @Joy-zv4ci
    @Joy-zv4ci 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1693

    They added it to FIFA 15 and 16 but it's broken😂😂

    • @juanaids
      @juanaids 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Yea

    • @enzio1977
      @enzio1977 8 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      How to activate it? It never workrs with me.

    • @DimitarFCBM
      @DimitarFCBM 8 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      It activates by itself.

    • @dardog
      @dardog 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Bruh. hit cross bar like next to line (post)

    • @Hodenkobold85
      @Hodenkobold85 8 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Why is it broken? I never noticed any issues

  • @neutral1087
    @neutral1087 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I got recommended this after Yamal's disallowed against madrid

  • @zac2013
    @zac2013 9 ปีที่แล้ว +518

    U thought the lampard incident was bad... Come to fifa 16 😂

  • @anasshahid224
    @anasshahid224 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Great to see technology improving FIFA football 👏👏👏

    • @hibye4469
      @hibye4469 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Your 10 years late bro, and so am i

    • @anasshahid224
      @anasshahid224 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@hibye4469 so true man 😉

  • @tafadzwanashenaisonchingom4919
    @tafadzwanashenaisonchingom4919 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Im from the future, we have offside tech as well

  • @xmorfey3f
    @xmorfey3f 8 ปีที่แล้ว +41

    2013 and they still have windows xp.

    • @unknown5159
      @unknown5159 8 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      best and easiest os known to man

    • @Ed-tg2sp
      @Ed-tg2sp 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      bjy true that

  • @flying_sheep
    @flying_sheep 4 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Who is here after Sheffield's disallowed goal?

  • @Dakblake
    @Dakblake 11 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    I thought the thumbnail was some sort of new xbox or something haha

  • @7777carlosf
    @7777carlosf 10 ปีที่แล้ว +925

    Offside technology would be better than this.

    • @thetruer3fl3x33
      @thetruer3fl3x33 9 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Offside is a waste of time cause without the offside that is what u call football

    • @JAKESWIFTROCKS45
      @JAKESWIFTROCKS45 9 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      That would be stupid cause of your toe is off then it is offside

    • @vika0194
      @vika0194 9 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      +Carlos Franco the offside rule is a rule of interpretation.. it's not only about being in an offside position. the refs have to decide if he is active in the play...

    • @r37ro94
      @r37ro94 9 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      That would be like the hardest thing ever . They would need to put tech all around the pitch

    • @fbshortfilms4126
      @fbshortfilms4126 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Absolutely-if you think about it-it's actually really easy to make offside technology. Just think about VR, computer games etc

  • @Joaquin-pm6ij
    @Joaquin-pm6ij 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    GRANDE PAOLO GUERRERO REPRESENTANDO A NUESTRO QUERIDO PERU :)

  • @jerombolo2688
    @jerombolo2688 9 ปีที่แล้ว +624

    Why so much technology for that? two to three cameras mounted in the crossbar is enough

    • @Firegamers789
      @Firegamers789 9 ปีที่แล้ว +204

      The ref isn't allowed to see the replay of the goal, the technology allows them to know when the ball is behind the line

    • @jerombolo2688
      @jerombolo2688 9 ปีที่แล้ว +85

      Firegamers789 why isn't he allowed to rewatch it?

    • @DigitalTwisted
      @DigitalTwisted 9 ปีที่แล้ว +160

      Jerombolo The argument amongst the critics is if we introduce video replays like other sports it would slow down the game too much, so rather than stopping the game so the ref can watch a replay they use the current system so that the cameras and the tech do all the work and it just alerts the referee if it's a goal.
      FIFA stated the system must be able to do this in under 1 second to be considered. The 2 systems that passed are the ones that are now used.

    • @nikelaaaos
      @nikelaaaos 9 ปีที่แล้ว +68

      Jerombolo Because Football is not an American sport.

    • @jerombolo2688
      @jerombolo2688 9 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Nicke. Well tennis is neither but they have this system there. Forgot it's name. You probably know which one, to see if the ball touches the line or not

  • @alfdoe2441
    @alfdoe2441 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Who’s here after Sheffield vs Aston Villa

  • @Potatinized
    @Potatinized 8 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    hundreds of people keep saying in the comment that it can be solved by just using simple camera. If all of you have thought about it, what makes you think they skipped that idea? It's because they want more than that. Not because they didn't thought of it.

    • @WorldCaleb
      @WorldCaleb 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      *think

    • @Potatinized
      @Potatinized 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Caleb Silverman you're right. Thanks.

    • @Potatinized
      @Potatinized 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      ***** You have problem with us potatoes now? huh? You choked on one of us when you're a child or something?

    • @Potatinized
      @Potatinized 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      *****
      Potatoes can read minds~~~
      Not really. I'm the one you chocked on and you shat me and I live again. I like the feeling of being inside you.

  • @alans8682
    @alans8682 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Marcos Dani los voy a extrañar fueron buenos momentos nunca los olvidare

  • @Elpuma1374
    @Elpuma1374 7 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    Glad to see FIFA using modern technology: is the future of the game and the world at large.

  • @ranmitha988
    @ranmitha988 7 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Interesting. Good job for the people who made it, it must've been so hard

  • @Harzexe
    @Harzexe 9 ปีที่แล้ว +232

    5:50 wow! he should be a striker! RL9 is no one comapared to him xD

  • @dk0r51
    @dk0r51 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    04:57 The non-visible spectra of electromagnetic fields used in this detection system are not affected by "day light or night conditions".
    However, their testing equipment, which does operate in the visible range, is.

    • @erdemmemisyazici3950
      @erdemmemisyazici3950 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I wonder if similar systems are installed on highways to predict car crashes?

  • @PugsNotDrugs4
    @PugsNotDrugs4 8 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    The NHL needs to use this technology for determining if the puck crossed the line or not. Far too often it's deemed inconclusive because the puck can't be seen through the goalies glove or underneath him.

    • @Etherion195
      @Etherion195 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +PugsNotDrugs4 That won't work, because this system only uses cameras. And if the puck is under the goalie and the goalie is in the goal with a part of his big protective material, even the cameras can't recognize it.

    • @TaufikAkbar7
      @TaufikAkbar7 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      can use the electromagnetic method.

    • @Etherion195
      @Etherion195 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Taufik Akbar
      doesn't work, a puck is made out of hard rubber

    • @SWalkerTTU
      @SWalkerTTU 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Etherion195 Maybe they could repurpose the puck design from the old FoxTrax system.

    • @Etherion195
      @Etherion195 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@SWalkerTTU i don't know exactly how that one works, but it seems like it works with lights, which in turn would cause the same problems as the other mentioned methods.

  • @rz6536
    @rz6536 10 ปีที่แล้ว +666

    Frank Lampard goal was over the line

    • @preetrajpal5665
      @preetrajpal5665 9 ปีที่แล้ว +29

      ***** It would not have mattered anyway 4-1 I mean hello?????

    • @ExpertPlasma
      @ExpertPlasma 9 ปีที่แล้ว +177

      Phillip Jang The score was 2-1 at the time. Going into the second half at 2-2 rather than 2-1 would have completely changed the momentum of the game. Two goals in Two Minutes would have been a real confidence booster and Germany would have been on the back foot.

    • @preetrajpal5665
      @preetrajpal5665 9 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Expert Plasma You know, when you play sports sometimes stupid decisions are made and you have to deal with it. And the fact that the score was 4-1 instead of staying at maybe 2-1 or 3-1 showed that England's collapse was inevitable. Anyway, have fun at the next world cup

    • @preetrajpal5665
      @preetrajpal5665 9 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      But you can't blame losing a game because of it things happen and you have to deal with it.

    • @petrosmos688
      @petrosmos688 9 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      Phillip Jang Actually, it would. The match wouldve been 2-2 with momentum on the English side.
      btw im not english

  • @ethanbaker2583
    @ethanbaker2583 9 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    They should do a TMO system like they do in rugby

    • @jamalatl4157
      @jamalatl4157 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      what is that?

    • @harrisonsingleton3398
      @harrisonsingleton3398 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +JamalPLAYS MC where there is a ref who watches the replays and makes a decision

    • @zadan_oly7132
      @zadan_oly7132 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Jazzicals Mr skeleton hands man yes in soccer it’s called var but it’s not used in la liga and other leagues for some reason

  • @pramitkarmakar804
    @pramitkarmakar804 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Welcome to the Future ☺️ 2022
    However, today we lost one of the greatest of Football Pele 😌

  • @gusbr95
    @gusbr95 10 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    What about offsides technology Hugh to many goals called off especially for Mexico in this World Cup

    • @kaywop7582
      @kaywop7582 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah also the goal Messi scored at World Cup for argentina

  • @harikrisrain
    @harikrisrain 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank You, Frank

  • @hasancanar3125
    @hasancanar3125 8 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    As bayrakları as...

    • @martinluther2745
      @martinluther2745 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hemen hızlı hızlı gelip boş şeylere bayrakları asıyorsunuz

  • @pkkthetiger
    @pkkthetiger 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Also because in football the time taken to make that decision would add to the extra time since the clock isn't stopped during intervals such as goals,outsides, corners etc

  • @dankennedy6377
    @dankennedy6377 8 ปีที่แล้ว +58

    Liverpool vs Sevilla: 3 handballs in the Box from Sevilla and the referees didn't. See any of them

  • @SGamerFamily
    @SGamerFamily 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    thats the thing, the clock needs to be continually rolling, that's a huge part of why this sport is so amazing. I think if they stopped the game after every foul or offside or goal then the game would take twice as long and the game would be completely different.

  • @TheLifeguardMW
    @TheLifeguardMW 11 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Whilst i agree that works for many sports, that idea is used very effectively; unfortunately replays take time to analyse and make a decision upon. For stop-start sports like basketball, american football and rugby, that's fine! However for continuous sports with only very short breaks (by comparison), it is important that momentum etc is maintained by a very quick system, such as the ones shown.

  • @RichardShearer
    @RichardShearer 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    I totally agree 100% I really don't understand why they are complicating matters with all this technology. all you basically need is a guy to check the replays

  • @shosc16
    @shosc16 11 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    guys its a watch that will inform the refs its a goal... he doesnt have to wait for someone to tell him it went in or watch a replay.

  • @pranukvs
    @pranukvs 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    in the goal-ref technology which uses a magnetic field .. a passive electronic chip is implanted into the ball ...

  • @Schzire
    @Schzire 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I had this recommendation after the Japan winner against Spain

    • @sdgaming9561
      @sdgaming9561 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      That ball was still in Play due to the ball being a sphere the outer edge was still in play so it still counts as a goal

    • @TrueSeeker
      @TrueSeeker 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Right 👍

    • @yechrisxuu9336
      @yechrisxuu9336 ปีที่แล้ว

      It doesn’t actually work like that goal line tech is only used inside the goal and in the Fifa WC scenario the ball sends signals that tell the VAR room when to check to see if it’s in play or not.

  • @7heLostAndDamned
    @7heLostAndDamned 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    another great step towards matching fixing prevention!

  • @OhNoNotFrank
    @OhNoNotFrank 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Someone is going to see this in 50 years and think, that was considered a compact system?

  • @ellieroar
    @ellieroar 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow, You are really good. We Enjoyed this, Well done.

  • @Cobra41PW
    @Cobra41PW 8 ปีที่แล้ว +72

    why not just use the replay? You have cameras there already

    • @nielmio4784
      @nielmio4784 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      +ae TÂY ĐÔNG CLAN you put the camera just behind the post facing the line, that's it.

    • @Cobra41PW
      @Cobra41PW 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      +ae TÂY ĐÔNG CLAN well then you know it's a goal for sure if it hits the camera in the net

    • @flemingcourt
      @flemingcourt 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      why not? it works well in rugby

    • @tjkenna217
      @tjkenna217 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      But the ref can't see it

    • @tjkenna217
      @tjkenna217 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      At the current time

  • @aldairrufino7260
    @aldairrufino7260 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    DIOS NOS BENDIGA Y CUIDE A USTEDES Y A SUS FAMILIAS SIEMPRE. ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙌🙌🙌🙌🙌🇵🇪🇵🇪🇵🇪🇵🇪🇵🇪.

  • @orri.einarsson
    @orri.einarsson 9 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    we need offside things for football (SOCCER)

  • @kelvibulku9902
    @kelvibulku9902 9 ปีที่แล้ว +152

    114 people are Juventus and Germany fans!

    • @andrewwilliams4524
      @andrewwilliams4524 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      242 now

    • @ItsIskandar
      @ItsIskandar 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      +Kelvi Bulku (Pr3d4t0rElite18) Don't forget Chelsea ;)

    • @oreofc8494
      @oreofc8494 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      254

    • @DefinitelyNotJoao
      @DefinitelyNotJoao 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +Kelvi Bulku (Pr3d4t0rElite18) You mean England (1966).....

    • @kelvibulku9902
      @kelvibulku9902 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      Joao Antonio Nope.

  • @erik8467
    @erik8467 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    just put a camera or sensor above the goal line, everytime the ball passes that line, the watch says "Goal" 1 sensor and camera per goal instead of a these wires and technology

    • @SLTRR
      @SLTRR 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Erik Arustamyan or even better install a small go pro inside the goal post so it won't affect balls being blocked and face it towards the other post and also ask the fucking rules to change where if footage shows a goal credit it rather than following the blind af referee

  • @yabbaguy
    @yabbaguy 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Today in the Premier League, Chelsea vs. Hull posed a challenge to Hawk-Eye. Sure TV replays also could've conclusively shown that the ball hadn't gone in, but the system was able to accurately and *instantly* determine that a goal had not occurred.
    The key thing is it did its job and still allowed the match to flow, like a football match should. The suggestion of just viewing a TV replay, although it works in other sports, would be inappropriate here.

  • @mudabirali
    @mudabirali 10 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    From a goalies perspective this technology could be his worst nightmare

  • @mps11397
    @mps11397 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    i was wondering the same thing. there is probably some chip, or something inside the ball that triggers the response. so when an arm or leg or an entire player crosses it, it will not mark it as a goal.

  • @abdulmw
    @abdulmw 10 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    They also need offside technology too. To bring the game into 21st century.

  • @blazingglory989
    @blazingglory989 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    They should set it up to where it flashes green lights on the post if the goal has been scored.

  • @xFlow777
    @xFlow777 11 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    in my opinion before deciding if there was goal or not refs should look at the slowmo replay then decide just like in American football, with this thing you just have more ways to rig the game

    • @ybk360
      @ybk360 11 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      What people are afraid of is that replays would slow down the game. But I think they should do it during important games or, more specifically, starting at the 80th minute of an important match while the teams are searching for the winning goal.

    • @levi799
      @levi799 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ybk360 To let the game slow down when the players are tired might be bad... or good.

    • @angelbonilla52
      @angelbonilla52 11 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Should they have timeouts too?

    • @n40798
      @n40798 11 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      This system eliminates the need for the refs to take the time to review a replay.

    • @Alppaksoy93
      @Alppaksoy93 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      Angel Bonilla There was no need for sarcasm. He's absolutely right. Most of American games are usually being reviewed by the referrers in slow motion in order to make a right call. What's point to waste your time to wait this technology to develop efficiently in the meanwhile most of matches get slaughtered by referees rather than just looking the cameras ?

  • @djfunkychicken
    @djfunkychicken 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    microchip chip in the ball and on the players top and shorts.. No more issues with offside or ball out of play.
    Put some super bright lights on the inside of the goal post so when the ball crosses the goal line.. It lights up and flashes!!!
    People will LOVE this idea

  • @mohammedmbarak9180
    @mohammedmbarak9180 10 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    What if the ball hit the sensors in the post won't they be damaged? or what material were used?

  • @MasiKarimi
    @MasiKarimi ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks a lot for the info!

  • @Joecool20147
    @Joecool20147 8 ปีที่แล้ว +40

    Script 6:27

    • @Shootp90
      @Shootp90 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +josh m ^^^^

    • @therealmvp8662
      @therealmvp8662 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      He was reading it so he can speak better in english

    • @FoxGoalie
      @FoxGoalie 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      +Alfie Williams No, you can see a shadow holding something like a gun that was pointed at him!

    • @theroknar4579
      @theroknar4579 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      He is turkish

    • @merenyd
      @merenyd 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Be respect.He is speak other language.What do you want? He speak like an Englishman?

  • @user-hv5th1ws5m
    @user-hv5th1ws5m 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Do one for offside

  • @yazan774
    @yazan774 9 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    why did they only use it in the world cup? did not see it in the liga or ucl

    • @melbournefreekickerz4281
      @melbournefreekickerz4281 8 ปีที่แล้ว +31

      It's in epl

    • @Ferdinanddpv
      @Ferdinanddpv 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +yazan774 UEFA wil implement the technology in 2016-2017 UCL.

    • @melbournefreekickerz4281
      @melbournefreekickerz4281 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      also did some research its really expensive, talkin like 500k to be installed in one stadium

    • @xmasta105
      @xmasta105 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Melbourne Freekickerz thats not that much compared to the price of the clubs

    • @waynecure32
      @waynecure32 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Bpl

  • @sportstechie
    @sportstechie 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    there are four technology providers in the GLT mix so not yet

  • @PeacemanNOT
    @PeacemanNOT 10 ปีที่แล้ว +105

    What happens when the ball hits one of those sensors in the goal, it falls off and the goalie is knocked out... that would be funny.

    • @agustinlyon8173
      @agustinlyon8173 10 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      Its impossible...

    • @manuelg7765
      @manuelg7765 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +Agustinøx Jrø it is possible

    • @agustinlyon8173
      @agustinlyon8173 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      FOOOT Manuel How exactly?

    • @manuelg7765
      @manuelg7765 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      Agustinøx Jrø the ball could have been hit so hard the camera falls off and then the GK is under the camera trying to get the ball and then BOOM gets knocked out 😎

    • @agustinlyon8173
      @agustinlyon8173 9 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      FOOOT Manuel And personally , i don't think that a player would kick directly to the cameras/sensor just to throw it. It would be childish and stupid.

  • @thejh6572
    @thejh6572 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Offside technology is also quite important as that of the goal line technology... Waiting for the FIFA to take that immediate action

  • @hacim4576
    @hacim4576 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    6 YEARS AGO
    ALREADY
    and on my recommended 4 some reason
    TH-cam is broken

  • @quentin3330
    @quentin3330 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Informative video. Very cool.

  • @Itsjoelnotjoel
    @Itsjoelnotjoel 11 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    as lONG AS we don't turn into hockey with the red lights and goal horns well actually Goal Horns are sick but I like the GOOAAAALLLL better

  • @varsaljr
    @varsaljr 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    There are some goalkeepers that when their team are winning stop the fluid/rythim of the game more quickly than in the that hypotetic situation.

  • @aza091234
    @aza091234 10 ปีที่แล้ว +234

    JUST REVIEW IT ON A CAMERA! THE SAME COULD BE DONE FOR DIVING!!

    • @aza091234
      @aza091234 10 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      ***** Well it also improves the game. And stops cheating from happening.

    • @aza091234
      @aza091234 10 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      ***** It takes less time than you think also.

    • @Pece17
      @Pece17 10 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Yeah just like in hockey

    • @BobMarley-vz7my
      @BobMarley-vz7my 10 ปีที่แล้ว +39

      they should definitely look at replays for diving, but only in the box/penalty situations. otherwise i'll be wasting my whole day watching spain

    • @aza091234
      @aza091234 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      ***** Slow motion exists.

  • @Etherion195
    @Etherion195 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I wonder how the system can decide, if it was only a head or the ball going over the line

    • @chanceboxer8706
      @chanceboxer8706 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      It probably has a velocity meter that shows how fast it came in.

    • @Etherion195
      @Etherion195 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      chance boxer
      wouldn't make sense. A ball can also get in really slowly.

    • @chanceboxer8706
      @chanceboxer8706 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +Etherion yeah but a ball isn't attached to a larger mass. Like a head

    • @WorldCaleb
      @WorldCaleb 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      There is a monitor inside the ball that gets triggered when the ball passes, it's not just movement, smh...

    • @Etherion195
      @Etherion195 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Caleb Silverman
      and how do you think, they achieve that? Inside the ball is air and the ball has to have the same mass over the whole surface, so that it doesn't wobble in the air.

  • @yimmyallainext
    @yimmyallainext 10 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    minuto 6:48 sale guerrero de PERU :D

  • @nederlandisvanons
    @nederlandisvanons 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    maybe each team should get 3 opportunitys to use the cameras, like when they really think the ref makes a huge misstake, and in this way it won't stop this ''rythim'' of the game that much. (sorry for my english, i'm dutch)

  • @nabilfekir5961
    @nabilfekir5961 10 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    France - Honduras !

  • @goku4393
    @goku4393 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Some type of triggering passive electronic item inside hardcore of the ball and motion triggered of this passive electronic at each end of the goal post is all it takes rather than putting a slow motion camera and pulling cables for it.

  • @iMesho10
    @iMesho10 11 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    Why do they use windows XP ?

    • @DaWolf805
      @DaWolf805 10 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Because it took a very long time to develop, and it's probably a hassle to redesign it for anything else.

    • @TyloriusTechTips
      @TyloriusTechTips 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      Andy Cox windows 7 was out in 2010 when they decided to make it...

    • @alkolaqi83
      @alkolaqi83 10 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      TyloriusTechTips It doesn't make a different any OS will do the job.

    • @Lmanyakaa
      @Lmanyakaa 10 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      because in real business world, not everything require "upgrade" just because there is a new version available for something. or go with orkham's razor, simplest explanation: they had a XP client at that day.
      these kind of software are usually developed platform-independent. xp or vista or 7 or 8 is not relevant. they are just operating systems, hence tools.

    • @alkolaqi83
      @alkolaqi83 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      exactly people need to understand that the underline technology is what matters and user interface is just for the avg users

  • @OurCognitiveSurplus
    @OurCognitiveSurplus 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Still need video reviews of decisions and post-match review systems.

  • @rbrtchng
    @rbrtchng 9 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    That server rack looks absolutely pitiful.

  • @HuLou
    @HuLou 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I think of side technology would be difficult because you can't just stop at play, then expect everyone to get to the same exact spot if he wasn't offside!

  • @PennyHerbst
    @PennyHerbst 8 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Maan, what an effort. Why not just put 2 slow-mo cams behind each goal and two team members - one from each team - in the catacombs looking at the monitor :D People tend to over engineer

    • @pav4n538
      @pav4n538 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +PennyHerbst You would have to pause play while they look at the slow mo, what if another incident happens between the goal and the slo mo recognising the goal

    • @Etherion195
      @Etherion195 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Pav4n
      Because it's fucking expensive, goals can't really be moved again, it will be even more expensive, if something breaks, and it's not necessarily a useful effort. Plus, what happens, if referees start to count on this and then it doesn't work maybe one time? Nothing is flawless, but i'd rather have a very small human flaw than a very expensive technical flaw, which makes it lose all it's purpose.

    • @pav4n538
      @pav4n538 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's not expensive relative for the money that is in football, at around £250K per install and it will last years and years, Premier League officials earn between £70,000/yr and £85,000/yr a year, the system pays for itself in the long run. Goals don't really get moved often, on the rare occasions where the groundsmen change the pitch they are more likely to repaint along the sides of the pitch. You seem to expect the system to have errors, Hawk-eye has been used in tennis for 10 years, and in other sports like cricket for nearly as long, this isnt exactly new technology. Even if Hawk-Eye was to slip up once, it would still be more accurate than a referee, look at all the close calls it has made already in the Premier League without incident. The reason this technology is needed isn't because the job cannot be done by a human, but because the decision needs to be instant, something a human cannot do. The reason it needs to be instant is so the ref can stop the game and declare the goal has been scored. You can't pause the game, or go back at a later time and declare that was a goal and play must be stopped, that's not football.

    • @Etherion195
      @Etherion195 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Pav4n
      uhm, your calculation is actuallypretty much non-existent. You don't pay more officials only because they need to watch the goals.
      The pitch is changed almost every year in some stadiums and therefore the goals have to be moved and everything maybe has to be installed again.
      But you areabsolutely right that the decision has to be instand, sometimes refs don't see that the situation has to be reviewed, i didn't think of that.
      Well but there still are problems. In football, the pitch is many, many times larger than a tennis court and the lines are sometimes not as visible as in other sports. And how does the camera decide, if it was the ball or just a head, which was going over the line?

    • @mux3044
      @mux3044 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Etherion Refs aren't allowed to use replays as confirmation of goals .

  • @hnl4838
    @hnl4838 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A day when football was changed

  • @keezy.s5978
    @keezy.s5978 9 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    Why referees when you have cameras ^_^

    • @spideydudenof7085
      @spideydudenof7085 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Keezy .S for fights fauls and giving out cards

  • @0Bennyman
    @0Bennyman 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    You do realise that the ball isnt a magnet right? Its basically a ball version of kinect but has something small inside so the camera picks it up instantly

  • @kristapssavnors3031
    @kristapssavnors3031 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Why cant they just put couple of go pros in the net?

    • @amishposer2905
      @amishposer2905 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      I know right, it's easier than waiting for two years to have it installed

    • @joelayala2565
      @joelayala2565 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's harder to make an instant decision with cameras. You have to watch the replay and decide. Since football time is always going it takes unnecessary time.

    • @Etherion195
      @Etherion195 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Joel Ayala doesn't matter. The game already is so long and time is wasted on every occassion (throw in's, corner kick, freekick etc). also those situations don't happen really often, so i would rather have a correct decision and play 94 instead of 92 minutes than having a wrong decision and just save two minutes. In the end those two minutes don't matter at all.

    • @joshhfletchh4841
      @joshhfletchh4841 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      i think most football fans would prefer no replays

    • @joshhfletchh4841
      @joshhfletchh4841 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      slows the game down too much

  • @Enlightenedapps
    @Enlightenedapps 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent video. 👍

  • @soccerlover200012
    @soccerlover200012 8 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    What is the point of this "high Tech" if the ref can't even change his decision

    • @Oscar-er7sf
      @Oscar-er7sf 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Exactly

    • @AmeerHijjawi
      @AmeerHijjawi 8 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      the ref is allowed to change his decision.. it happened couple of times in soccer.. if there is a definitive reason to change it.. most recent to memory is kloses goal that was awarded then was cancelled when he told the ref he scored it with his hand.. then the ref cancelled the goal..

    • @uwantsumfuk2500
      @uwantsumfuk2500 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      good on him

    • @Sam-gf6ue
      @Sam-gf6ue 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Abran Alvarez well it just happened in the fa cup final this year

  • @corduroycrook
    @corduroycrook 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    In soccer you can't stop play like that. Not only does the game lose its fluidity and rhythm but it can also cause players to cramp up and injuries will be at a higher risk. It works in basketball and football because those are stop and start games, in both sports there are multiple timeouts and pauses at the end of each quarter. Soccer simply doesn't have time to stop like that.

  • @spacepod9178
    @spacepod9178 8 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    Yet in the FIFA games, "Goal-line technology" sucks baaaaaaaaaad.

    • @xmasta105
      @xmasta105 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      haha so true

    • @maradonaistheman
      @maradonaistheman 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      I some times wonder that too, the ball goes out of the line, and instead of a throw-in, the game just continues on.

    • @sohi7431
      @sohi7431 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      "it's well over the line" 5 yards away From the line XD

    • @vika0194
      @vika0194 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      SpacePod9 no on FIFA games it is 100% correct but the replay stops at the wrong moment which makes it look like it wasn't a goal

  • @jasonvh8372
    @jasonvh8372 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    A great invention

  • @kob6912
    @kob6912 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    And now, Sheffield United have been failed by Hawkeye’s technology

  • @videoperuvians
    @videoperuvians 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    *Uruguay vs Perú faltó está tecnología, el VAR manual no sirve para los goles*

    • @mastergol
      @mastergol 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Del 2013, y estamos en 2022

  • @Hobbitstomper
    @Hobbitstomper 8 ปีที่แล้ว +64

    Funny how Football is the most popular sports around the world, and yet sports like Tennis, Ice Hockey, American Football etc. have those technologies and much much more, for years and years. In Ice Hockey, if the referee on the ice makes a mistake, the 2nd team of referees will watch the slow motion reply and correct him if necessary.
    How come FIFA is so slow in adapting to new technologies?
    With all the technology we have, we could assist the referee with everything. No more wrong cards, unseen hand ball, unseen fouls, fake fouls etc. It would actually be fair play for once. But nope, let's include human errors, cause it's more fun.

    • @aidangarner1181
      @aidangarner1181 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Well yes, it is more fun

    • @beaglefarts5282
      @beaglefarts5282 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      it's a process

    • @walleball29
      @walleball29 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      yeh in sports u need creativity not a bunch of machines

    • @_aidid
      @_aidid 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Hobbit Stomper Football is the best and most loved sports in the world. The amalgamation of talent and technology would reduce unfairness in games. FIFA knows more than you so they know how and when to bring new technology in action.

    • @Hobbitstomper
      @Hobbitstomper 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Aidid Rashed First off, there is not such thing as "best" in life. Anyone who uses the word "best" to compare anything in life, is clearly immature.
      Second, the reason FIFA doens't update their technology, is because FIFA is run by a bunch of 70-80 year old conservative men who are afraid of change. They grew up without technology, and they think that technology will ruin the sport. This way of conservative thinking is wrong. Our world is constantly changing, so we need to adapt to it as well. All the other sports that introduced technology just got more popular and a lot fairer.

  • @marsiilindbytyqi2973
    @marsiilindbytyqi2973 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    its really good technoligy

  • @EllsMurray
    @EllsMurray 10 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Haha he is definitely reading that at 6:26

  • @Baggaz
    @Baggaz 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    the point is that with, say, 3 people on the goal line trying to clear or block the ball, it isn't accurate enough if you can't see the ball to just watch replays. Goal line technology is much more advanced, I'm sure.

  • @Hildebertovenegas997
    @Hildebertovenegas997 11 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Is the referee reading a script? O_o

  • @crist6587
    @crist6587 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    @Euro 1996 Munteanu(Romania) scored a similar goal(not given) vs. Bulgaria. Romania lost 0-1 with no chance to progress out of the group.

  • @Raj-dj3ht
    @Raj-dj3ht 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    clicked off the video when sepp Blatter came

  • @joseeliascarmona9473
    @joseeliascarmona9473 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    I think its cool to work in this, work as a football tester

  • @albdinthug1627
    @albdinthug1627 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    WHO is here after Manchester and tottenhamn 😂

  • @tuoralgara1011
    @tuoralgara1011 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    amazing technology.

  • @MunhozHenrique
    @MunhozHenrique 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    VAI CORINTHIANS
    CAMPEÃO 2012

  • @boredguy52
    @boredguy52 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    sometimes the angle of the camera can't offer a good view because player's bodies, arms, or legs are in the way.