Mechanism of intron removal and exon splicing

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 24 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 61

  • @behroznaeem3376
    @behroznaeem3376 9 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    6 hours of my lectures covered in 6 minutes.. you are awesome man (y) I wish we had teachers like you

  • @cocobeane
    @cocobeane 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    AHHH! God bless you! My teacher turned this into a whopping 30 minutes of complete confusion trying to explain this.

  • @dazerfernaza
    @dazerfernaza 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    what happens to the 2x U2AG when the B complex is formed. Do they sway with the u4,5,6 SNRP

  • @piggyftw1
    @piggyftw1 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for the explanation! very easy to understand...I wasn't that clear reading the book prior to watching this but now it makes sense!

  • @scottweinblatt8178
    @scottweinblatt8178 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Which protein is responsible for ligating two exons together after the intron has been cleaved?

  • @MTTAssayQueen
    @MTTAssayQueen 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    studying for my written quals, and this was fantastic. thanks.

  • @jonathandb91
    @jonathandb91 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome clarity in your video and the drawings were extremely helpful. However, I'm not sure the transesterification was explained properly (in detail anyway). They are actually nucleophilic attacks by the hydroxy group of: first, the 2' hydroxy of the branch point A on the 3' phosphate of exon 1's G, and second, the 3' hydroxy of the 3' G of Exon 1 attacking the phosphate on the 5' end of Exon 2

  • @KrazyBean14
    @KrazyBean14 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Awesome explanation. It makes complete sense now.

  • @trinhphuc7481
    @trinhphuc7481 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    thanks for doing this, really appreciate your enthusiasm

  • @ricardofolive
    @ricardofolive 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for the video. You are a great teacher.

  • @agathman
    @agathman  13 ปีที่แล้ว

    @RaGeLaD - Yeah, sorry about the links. Can't seem to make them work.

  • @shaboatrad4066
    @shaboatrad4066 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Shouldn't the 🔼G be negetive
    cause when its Zero we gotta have equilibrium and the reverse will happen too

    • @agathman
      @agathman  8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Degradation of the removed intron afterward probably prevents the reaction from being reversed. But I can't say for sure.

    • @shaboatrad4066
      @shaboatrad4066 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Allen Gathman so 🔼G might be negetive or zero with degradation of products

    • @sensejimpreza
      @sensejimpreza 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      In vitro studies have shown that most of the major spliceosomal assembly steps, including the catalytic splicing events, are reversible. This implying that there might be proof reading steps.
      Of course this is an in vitro study and futher research has to be carried out. But meaning its reversible means that its delta g is about 0.

  • @kevinbishop5722
    @kevinbishop5722 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for explaining the process so well.

  • @Charlotte-dl4iu
    @Charlotte-dl4iu 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Are the introns spliced by the same spliceosome or do each genes have their own unique/different spliceosomes?

    • @hammeredgrannies7821
      @hammeredgrannies7821 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      Spliceosomes assemble on the transcript, as shown; it's an interesting question. As far as I know the SNRNPs are not specific to particular transcripts.

  • @clocks42292
    @clocks42292 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Isn't it a 2'-->5' bond, not 5'-->2'? Or does that not even matter?

    • @agathman
      @agathman  11 ปีที่แล้ว

      It doesn't matter; it's a 2' bonded to a 5'. There's no directionality to the bond itself.

  • @samirahassan6986
    @samirahassan6986 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent explanation so easy to understand, I thank you

  • @horseprincess22
    @horseprincess22 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    This was a really good explanation! Thanks!

  • @agustinasofiatorres8390
    @agustinasofiatorres8390 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Perfecta explicación, muy claro!

  • @SubeeKarma
    @SubeeKarma 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Finally. Thank you good sir!

  • @mattaltman8972
    @mattaltman8972 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    doing gods work sir, thank you

  • @badshabz1
    @badshabz1 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    i think this is to university level?

  • @charleskakilla
    @charleskakilla 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very good explanation.

  • @shaboatrad4066
    @shaboatrad4066 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you soo much you teach REALLY COMPLETE

  • @noartificialflavor
    @noartificialflavor 10 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    bless this man

  • @ramisha9255
    @ramisha9255 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    11/10 amazing video

  • @harshmishra2615
    @harshmishra2615 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome! This was really helpful.

  • @jacobchevlen5600
    @jacobchevlen5600 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Incredible! Thank you sir!

  • @wwbrunaww
    @wwbrunaww 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    great lesson

  • @apocalypsodarkelf
    @apocalypsodarkelf 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wonderful. Thank you.

  • @qwilley4400
    @qwilley4400 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you, awesome video

  • @RBRB431
    @RBRB431 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you made things very clear

  • @lidnsya
    @lidnsya 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you! This is explained so well. :)

  • @shafaqjameel4755
    @shafaqjameel4755 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    great job man.

  • @yessica.a
    @yessica.a 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very helpful! Thanks!

  • @TheRitvik5
    @TheRitvik5 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you sir !!!!!

  • @Amoxy55
    @Amoxy55 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you so much teacher

  • @luckylucy114
    @luckylucy114 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    all i can say is... i love you ~
    thanks for the video

  • @hassanalharbi8826
    @hassanalharbi8826 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I think you mixed up between U5 and U6!!

  • @collaboratedCAFFIENE
    @collaboratedCAFFIENE 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazing!

  • @AllieSmellzBigTime
    @AllieSmellzBigTime 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    So helpful!! Thank you

  • @PoisonAlienful
    @PoisonAlienful 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Brilliant!!

  • @kirichad7565
    @kirichad7565 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    you just made me understand thanks

  • @minusparrow
    @minusparrow 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    very good explanation; thanks very much :)

  • @cattycatterson
    @cattycatterson 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great! Thanks a lot!

  • @sosa222222
    @sosa222222 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great job..thank u

  • @collaboratedCAFFIENE
    @collaboratedCAFFIENE 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dude, you're the bees knees.

  • @LSI_MGA
    @LSI_MGA 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    AMAZING!

  • @kikijo92
    @kikijo92 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thankyou!!!

  • @achoursport1900
    @achoursport1900 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for this... :)

  • @LeafRaider
    @LeafRaider 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Heh, SNRPs. They always make me giggle.

  • @johnraviella6561
    @johnraviella6561 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    This 1D representation simply does not do it justice, it's misleading to students. Great job explaining it though for sure, not knocking the explanation.

    • @agathman
      @agathman  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      2D, I hope, but yeah, it's limiting. And furthermore, this is getting pretty old and no doubt needs to be revised based on research since I did it. But someone else will have to.

    • @johnraviella6561
      @johnraviella6561 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@agathman oh sorry, normally when I think of a sequence represented as a string I think of it as 1D; 1D was just a reference to not having RNA structure in many, if not all foundational biology texts for college students. It's an amazing explanation, thank you very much for providing it. My perspective here is trying to explain to folks how the new sequence-selective splice modulation small molecules that have recently been improved. After going into structural biology in the context of drug discovery against rare moulds, I realised that my undergraduate education lacked a foundation in structural biology. Thanks so much for the response!!

    • @agathman
      @agathman  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@johnraviella6561 Oh, I see what you mean now. Yeah, there's a lot I don't know about the structures underlying this process, and certainly even more I didn't know back when I made the video. It's a very rudimentary intro to the process. Sounds like cool stuff you're doing!

  • @charleskakilla
    @charleskakilla 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very good explanation.