Zuckerberg's Senate hearing highlights in 10 minutes
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 เม.ย. 2018
- Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg testified before a joint hearing in Congress to address steps the social network is taking in light of the Cambridge Analytica scandal.
Follow the hearing on CNET: cnet.co/2qmIwRP
Subscribe to CNET: bit.ly/17qqqCs
Watch more CNET videos: www.cnet.com/video
Follow CNET on Twitter: / cnet
Follow CNET on Facebook: / cnet
Follow CNET on Instagram: / cnet
Follow CNET on Snapchat: CNETsnap - วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี
Zuck to Congress: I welcome regulation -- if it's the right regulation - www.cnet.com/news/congress-to-grill-facebook-zuckerberg-over-data-mining-election-meddling-cambridge-analytica/
CNET liar zucker
it can't be run with the algorithms currently being applied.
CNET This whole non sworn in pathetic milk toast hearing was a joke! There was not even an investigation into the violations that this man and his company have perpetrated against the American people.
He is as are many of these senators "prolific liars"
This editing of the testimony is misleading when it comes to the monopoly part at least.
CNET We need to recognize that part of what appears to have been going on, was Congress fishing for statements to use as leverage later on. A similar type of strong arming used in journalism. Congress designed parts of the meeting to be used as out of context ammunition for leveraging agendas they have in mind, by using footage of the meeting to state that Facebook and Zuckerberg backs them up.
Regardless of how upset people are with Facebook, we need to recognize these pitfall traps before we have the government stepping too far into industries that they would only mess up with too heavy of a hand, we've seen what third lapdog the FCC did, what's next? We could see a clear misunderstanding or manipulation of Zuckerberg by the senator asking about privacy vs paid platform. Anyone of us who have used the premium side of a service like mobile games, Spotify, etc know what sucks was stating. NO ads for paid, targeted ads with info, irrelavent ads without info. And yet it was being twisted into "pay to protect your data". I don't know if this is because the senator was just too old to get it, or out of intentional manipulation. If the public isn't careful this debate will cause ratholes for uneeded heavy handedness to over regulate the internet (especially with net nuetrality gone).
Cnet I'm not sure if you as a company are allowed to take a stance but I urge you to please take these things into consideration, especially if you have future content to be released on the topic. Even as a business you are an influencer.
Thank you for taking the time to read this if you did
Blink if you’re not a lamp
Abiti3131 *eyes open wider*
Abiti3131 hahahahabbahaha
Bad lip reading
Can i *sleep* its been 2 months😳😴
*takes longest sip of water*
I watched the bad lip reading before this and now I feel like his real voice doesn't match his face.
Holy shit same.
Mr. Blu same 😂
Same as well, haha
Hehe. Me too
Same I felt like I was watching another lip reading lol
When politicians get politician style answers hahahaha
lol yeah I had the exact same thought - "Senators trying to get a straight answer out of someone isn't that rich. 😂"
This video is all the things I hate in the world
The politician doesn't even know how to use the internet
I wouldn't have been suprised if one of the older senators asked: "how many pages does this book have?"
he!he!he!😅
Ur a moron… let’s laugh about it instead of doing something… 🤡
🤣😂🤣😂🤣
You can tell he's still not used to his human skin-suit.
Tanya Degurechaff right!!😆
LOL
Its very obvious...
Tanya Degurechaff I will be throughly checking the whole footage he could'nt have possibly been so long without shifting.
mark L I Z A R D B O R G
It was like a firing squad that had literally no idea how the guns work
Adam Shephard that just puts a Hilarious comic in my head. XD one politian with a machine gun and the coil of bullets are loaded backwards, another holding the barrel of a revolver and pointing the handle of the gun at mark, yet another trying to afix a bayonet to a pistol, another trying to put the magazing of an AR into the side of the gun, one holding the gun in such a way that his thumb is on the trigger and the barrels facing him trying to look menacing, others holding m14's the wrong way, one clearly holding a water pistol, another holding a spudgun, another holding a jammed paintgun XD
theres a monty python sketch like this
Adam Shephard good simile
Another reason why I believe term limits would be a good change, However, there were some representatives who had a clue and I wish they would put those together so we can get to some of the real issues. Regardless, political answers for political figures were funny and it was good to see them just as upset as I feel when I'm told what they want me to hear and cya. However, I really appreciated John Kennedy's comment about Facebooks EULA. I about spit my food out.
I’m the 500 like, yw
Random boy to Zuck: My dad said your are stealing our data.
Zuck: He is NOT your DAD.
good joke somehow i never heard it yet :)
😂
I get it coz Facebook knows everyone
Gross. How logical fallacies become truth in a binary world. You always have to have a bag of imaginary numbers to correct it. And only if your IQ is high enough.
this is why I don't go social media web sites
Im surprised how much of patience he has. Cause he didnt turn into a reptillian even when he got so stressed🤣😜
Lol CIA
cringy cia
Yeh
those old people looked confused af with technology
Those were the engineers of that generations. These guys are politicians, not engineers
Those old people never grew up with social media though. And also, 'generations' were just made up so old people like you could talk trash about younger people. Generations don't exist. So don't bother using it in your arguments.
They clearly have no idea what they're talking about. How exactly would the proposed law be enforced (not to use the data of under 16s without parent's consent)? Also, with regards to the most un-inventive and useless generation in human history remark, have you heard of the dark ages?
Spot the Gen X'r
For your info you are a Millennial yourself...
Crap. I just realized this is how I sound during job interviews
Eric Cartman "Before I answer your questions, let me talk about where I come from. My parents weren't Very wealthy people, yet they where good hearted and told me the rights and wrongs of the world.. " haha
LMAOOO
HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAHHAHSAHDJLASDHÖLSAKHDAÖLSKDSA
I think he is forcing his voice to sound deeper and more authoritarian.
Eric Cartman
Really? SENATOR? ?????
-I'm sorry Mr Zuckerberg
-Yes?
-I don't understand...
-*_Which part?_*
The movie version of Zuck would have handled this like a pro.
😂 That movie is so good
@@rayofblacklight9910 In reality it was probably just as awkward. 😂😭
Do you mean the 'Social Network'??
@@phatakom yep
Man I feel with Zuckerberg, so many people dont know how the internet works
Right? Especially these old men who are asking him these questions.
You think Zuckerberg feels?
@@BiggaMyMan THEY don't know how it works. But Facebook, google, amazon and twitter (to a lesser degree) are tracking your every move anytime you use your phone web browser and apps. There are so many videos on it, but I didn't believe it. I then downloaded duckduckgo and other anti tracker apps along with wioth anti tracker browser extension. The argument and question at hand are why does Facebook need so much data and why is Facebook able to track people who don't have Facebook?
if you haev iPhone or android download duckduckgo and you'll see how many times Facebook google and amazon is tracker your every move.
Shut tf up he shouldnt be censoring people and stealing data
Clips on Clips angry????? 😂😂😂😂😂😂
This is definitely the most realistic Japanese robot to date.
Blood & Fyre looks like he's made out of Play-Doh lol
Men like bigger boobs.
He didn't have the chance to fall down stairs though, I feel like that's a test that wasn't administered here.
Blood & Fyre noooo they evoled it i mean him wants to gather ur data for human understanding lol
xlioilx BLEEE BOOOP hairline BLEEE BLOOP is an op op BLEEE optical illusion BLOOP.
Can’t say yes, can’t say no. Just say Senator
NANGSTAGRAM TV "my party will get back to you"
or just swipe it off by saying "in general"
well they asked such general questions it would be very hard to just say yes or no
those whole questions are noob traps :D and as y'know zuck is my dodgemaster man dodged them all like nothing
codywohlers The last question was a very easy yes or no. He could not even answer it.
Ain’t it crazy a social media platform made in his dorm got to the point where national security became at “risk”. I cant imagine being this man and so young so much responsibility s/o to young innovators
Who is hear after the TikTok CEO testify infront of the congress?
This just in: Old people don't understand how cookies work.
Don't you just eat them? I mean old people.
I'M JOKING
Wow its too bad we have people who dont understand what theyre talking about making decisions on the internet, its a good thing our generals are making high level military policy.
lol not surprising, can you give me a time stamp of when they talk about that? (the cookies part) I dont feel like watching the whole thing but I do want to see that part.
LMFAOOOO!!! Good one!! Hahahaha!!.
Are you crazy, aren't you? Do you really think that?
Robots have really improved over the years
I wonder if he's related to Sophie the android
Generic Name you should try being grilled by the senate on national television... I’m sure you wouldn’t piss yourself.
Generic Name 😂
Not surprised a generic name gives a generic joke
What robot? I just saw a snake alien .
The whole court system seems very unjust. I have full respect when I’m saying that, but I would never want to be interrogated by those men who have a one-sided mindset out there to prove you wrong in front of millions of people. I couldn’t do any better than Zuckerberg did. And I agree with his statements also. I feel that this system is flawed and shouldn’t be a determining factor of anything.
You pretty smart I want say I agree cause ion have social media but I feel you tho frfr ✌
If you are concerned about your privacy, then use other social networks. Facebook tells they are using your information. If you don't like it, just leave.
Otra persona más To be fair every social network does. They need a business model, how else are they supposed to offer a free service? It’s preposterous to me that the people were so shocked when they discovered it, I honestly thought that everyone knew what they were getting into when signing terms of service... This Congress sessions paints a terrifying picture of the USA citizens and congress honestly.
Now try convincing everyone to use something else than WhatsApp
Pro tip: You can't.
You can run a service with ads without seeing all messages and browser histories of the users.
@@hollaxow3331 I don't use WhatsApp and most of my friends and family use something different now as well. So it can work
@@JuliAn-qj2ld I am from Brazil and everyone uses WhatsApp , it's not that easy
Man he was stressed out there
GG DAVE robots don't feel stress
Squishy Toast he he does act like a robot
GG DAVE Wouldn’t you be?
I'd like to see who wouldn't be
He had a ton of cameras in front of him, who wouldn't?
How do i buy pigs on farmville
Senator
DirectMuffin7 😂😂😂
Senator I'm glad you brought it up that's a very insightful question.
ahahahahah
Literally came here to compare to the tiktok hearing
Honestly😒
Haha same
I came here after the Bad Lip Reading video and I thought I was still on that video because of Zuckerberg's voice.😂😂
anyone here from bad lip reading
KingPinken yup
Yup
Lmao me
I came to see if I could really get a good deal on a "special van".
🙋
He respecc
He atacc
But most of all
He sold your data for fat stacc
im sure he got more than 64.1 billion USD (mark networth currently) from that transaction, because if it me, im not selling my important data that can make my company collapse for a money that smaller than my networth. im pretty sure Mark is dumber than you therefore he sold a data for a fat staaaaccccccccccc
That's a facc
Peter Claeys FUCC
Mark fukerberg
he zucced
*He probably had to empty his sweat into a sink when he got home after this.*
If he was human which he is NOT
At 10:17 you can see him transform for a split second but then he realises where he is
@@hsgame4088 u got me
@@hsgame4088 lol
I love how, the democrat, "I would have to pay you, in order to not send me, using my personal information, something that I don't want".
Senator, a few years back, didn't you vote to make us pay for something some of us didn't want, and if we didn't buy it we paid for it anyway?
touche' XD
Destruction 100
Strawman.
Kevin Anthony doesn’t seem like a strawman argument. Can you explain how it is?
"So, what exactly are the internets?"
Ilmari Miettinen Its like those fishing nets, but these have electricity.
It's a series of tubes
BAHAHAHA
its a special time in a boys life....
Old people just are slow
anything you put online can be used publicly, why are people surprised by this?
legendp2011 that's not the problem. Facebook is also collect data from your phone that you didn't put on FB, like who you've been calling with. Thats the problem
ilke Altundag no offence but what makes you so special that anyone from Facebook would care to look at your data? It’s used for ads by a program but they don’t care about you and everything you’re doing ?
Sophie Mac its not about the little percentage of ppl who will use the info, its about what can possiblily happen to you if they use it
ilke Altundag Google does exactly the same thing. Most social media sites do it now. It's common practice to set up programs that follow our internet trail, the places we go and things we do everyday to make everything easier for the user and to get us to buy more products from the sites and companies we frequent.
If the NSA are allowed to do it, why can't Facebook? The government is being a hypocrite
I mean, FaceBook users agreed to the Terms of Service. So they should know that because they agree to it, they are basically ready for the risks that come with it
John Smith well its their fault now reading terms of service "shrug"
@John Smith kids can't use fb due to age limit know that
@John Smith ????? It's the parents fault ...….… ??? Why do they let their kids use Facebook anyways isn't it a risk that you know gonna happen a lot of time when u decide to have a kid
@John Smith ????? It's the parents fault ...….… ??? Why do they let their kids use Facebook anyways isn't it a risk that you know gonna happen a lot of time when u decide to have a kid
No one reads them so it shouldn't count
When one of the dudes said "you got a bean head" I felt that
Congress didn't do their damn homework. Are you joking me with these questions? Zuckerberg's having short circuits wondering wtf is up with these weird human's questions.
I know right so retarted they do have law and rules on there books lmao hahah Zuckerberg's is beyond u cant put in the book. they stole money for him maybe
Clearly they had a closed door meeting before this. This is just a show to keep everyone feeling good.
Nah, they are using Zuckerberg's answers for something else later on. These are all loaded questions, which Zuckerberg answers will be used out of context later on. These congress are snakes, they are not stupid, they are frikkin deceitful
ibealec have you watched to whole thing? Or just a sheep watching mainstream news propoganda
ibealec i completely agree, these old people don’t even understand the real issues
I'm not on Facebook's side on this matter, but jeez these senators don't understand what he's saying.
If you don't agree with facebook, they give you the option to turn off recommendations. How are people so blind. You even said they didn't listen yet you are against Facebook? Lol you going on their site for free means they can have ads. Whether it's data collected specific ads or just random ads is up to you.
@@ericwheelhouse4371 even if you opt out of personalized ads, they still can and do access and collect your data. That option only controls if they use your information to actively market advertisements to you.
@@rVnsunshine ofc they can you are using their apps,services and servers. Its normal they can.
@@tunahank83 I don't use Facebook (aside from every few months so people trying to contact me have my number/discord/email,) I'm not an ig or twitter user but many of the points being made her are about what is legal not what is currently normal.
@@zebedeesummers4413 Every single electronic device collect data about you .. WTF these points are stupid .. even if you not using any APP on device then device still collect data and send it to company.. Even just watching television provides company data, every single modern car collect data and send it to company even if you think not.. Those hearings are stupid unless there are ppl who understand how it works .. They should push to protect them better from hackers not to deny company to collect data .. Data is why you can improve things .. Every single information can provide inovation even if you think not ..
Senator: Can you please incriminate yourself.
Zuckerberg: No.
Senator: I yield my time.
Why do we think congress is smart enough to ask questions about such a complex business.
They were so out of touch I’m surprised none of them asked; “how do I print to pdf, mark?”
*He Sound Like A Mature Kermit😂😂*
NolimitFreshYT KO R/Rareinsults
oh jeez oh my god
too accurate
🤣🤣🤣 him and Patrick Mahomes both sound like Kermit
Wow he does
If any service you use is free then you are the product. Don’t get surprised if you feel used in that relationship. Just make sure what you give up is worth the service you’re getting.
Robertlavigne1 finally another human w common sense
Robertlavigne1 true
Increasingly true.
Service is one thing, my private info is another!!!
true
poor guy these old people dont understand how the internet works and theyre bombarding him. A lot of that shiz they asked doesnt just apply to facebook, it applies to basically all social media
Yep. 🤷🏾♂️🤦🏾♂️
"I wanna talk about how we got here" from bad lip reading
It's not like he's breaking into their houses and stealing their info, they are willingly putting whatever info they want onto the website he made.
Yeah? What about the info that isn't about the uploaders. My info. I did not willingly grant Facebook permission to use it, I didn't sign over anything. I didn't have a say and I didn't give permission to the stupid uploaders to have their way with me. People these days are inconsiderate and think that I am a ridiculous person for getting huffy about my privacy. I have to say, "NO!" to every business and family member and friend and random person who says, "This goes on our/my facebook page". Then I have to explain it to them over and over again. They can't upload that info of me, because that is me, they don't own me. I have the right to object. Everyone thinks it is all about them, forgetting that there are other people around them.
Lizard iculous 👍
Lizard iculous I completely get where you are coming from, but how did they get that info? You should not be giving info, taking pictures etc when you know damn well it will end up somewhere online one way or another
What about Metadata? You realize they don't just collect data you post, they collect data such as your location, where you're moving, your contacts and family members, which websites you're visiting, what messages you're sending via WhatsApp or messenger etc. If are logged on to FB (even if you don't have the tag or app open) or any software owned by FB (Such as Instagram, WhatsApp etc.) they are following all of your movements online and your physical movement in person.
Alex Volkov. It is pretty intense, and I believe there should be regulations about Data usage and privacy. My comment was mainly spawned from reading comments that seemed to act like Zucc has committed some horrendous cybercrime against humanity.
In regards to the Data usage, even the metadata, it's like getting on a bus every day, and then complaining that you don't like the route taken. No one is forcing you to ride the bus, and the route is obvious to anyone who looks it up. It's not a huge secret that facebook records all sorts of data, every website and service does now.
Facebook does have a bunch of issues though, such as its role in promoting biased media, and it shouldn't be allowed free reign over data.
Honestly his answers are pretty fair and straightforward. He acknowledges that Facebook is responsible for the mistakes they made, while qualifying that in a way that doesn't throw his company under the bus.
Jordan Sullivan I agree, he actually did address the points in all the questions. There were certainly times when he avoided saying yes or no, or side stepped questions like when that senator asked if he though the EU had it right, and he responded "I think they do get things right". Awkwardly, yeah, but he did end up evading that question. So not quite 100% direct but also not quite a politician. Though also worth remembering that this is the abridged version
zadose Yes and no, he was evasive at times but there were plenty of other times when I thought he was going to talk around an answer but then he ended up circling back to the question anyway. Still wouldn't call him a stand-up citizen but as far as answering questions he did alright.
Agreed. Mark was honest. Congress is ignorant and evidently believes he is the all-seeing all-knowing social media God. Mistakes are made by everyone. Mark should've asked *them* what they're doing to protect children from sex trafficking. Dumb asses worried about businesses targeting children with ads. Priorities.
hetaes True, but also let's not pretend all of our data on Facebook isn't being harvested haha.
I think that’s actually what he wants you to believe, the reality is he didn’t answer any questions at all, he always resources to the “we made a bunch of mistakes, we’re sorry” and then twists back to his speech
it's very interesting to see the negotiation between business and government so open and transparent. Of course, senators are quite old and not so aware of modern business strategies but the negotiation itself is precious . But it's wonderful to watch such a thing from the perspective of non-democratic country's citizen.
whats the point of all this ? they keep doing what they are doing
Damn. This was so painful to watch. It’s like the time my grandma asked how to send a fax on her iPhone and simply couldn’t understand why there’s no place for the paper to come out...and now they want to make a law about it 😐
Hair Jordan we don't need more laws. We have enough.
The “automatic opt-in” shit they’re talking about is the stuff they’re targeted by.
Old folks don’t know that stuff is going on, they just passively have their information taken because they were forced to click ‘agree’ when the software updated.
Bwahaha
When you sign up for Facebook you agree to dat shit. So why act so surprised...
A Happy Broccoli because people like to complain
Exactly. Hit the nail on the head, bro.
I signed up because I wanted to play Farmville.
Eden Izanami Someone else who signs up for the games!
If a bank or insurance company dod that they will be shit down and people will go to jail.
They should make a sequel to The Social Network with the senate hearing as the highlight
I like the "no ad" idea. No ads...... Ever.
Totally not a robot
Lmfao
The Beast Of TH-cam, Smdh. He got 166 brain-washed zombies agreeing with that comment. F****** idiots can't even see Fuckerberg's no better than them but gets to live the high life off their blood, breath and sweat. Let's see how rich he'd be if he was the only human on Earth.
GreatWall OfMexico Sooo he is a robot?
Martial Lee - Head Vegan Ninja... it is actually making me uncomfortable listening to him.
It's a Congressional hearing
that counsel is too old to ask sensible questions
These old people clearly don't understand technology and Internet business models. Their questions oversimplify the problems and seem only targeted at fighting Facebook and the Internet in general. I mean, these guys were probably already 50 when Internet was truly bloomed (2000), how can we expect them to learn at that age something so completely different than what they are used to?! They do not seem competent enough to deal with these complex issues.
And too old to understand that just by the fact you be in social network you cant be protect for keep all your information because if this happened it would not be a social being
You're a facebook bot aren't you? Just because they are putting pressure on your lord and savior Fuckerburg you think they don't understand technology? I'm 29 (and not ageist) and believe these senators asked reasonable questions.. especially the last one about protecting children's privacy that Fuckerburg blatantly dodged.
mossy1 yeah, that last question was on point.
But then you got questions like "if I'm *emailing on WhatsApp* ..."
The wrong use of terms speaks alone by itself but so what, right?
The thing is: *we already know that conversations on WhatsApp are encrypted from END TO END* .
I'm pretty sure these respectable people do not know what end-to-end encryption means.
I'm not saying they're useless. I'm saying they should have been mentored by experts on the topic. It's clear to me that they're are experts on anything else they do, but not in this topic, and a little mentoring would have helped put Mark on the spot instead of just giving him the safe exist of "you already have that option"
so you think they don't make senseable questions, when the big ones were. do you think peoples privacy should be bought. or that a law should be put into place to protect minors digital information. i am pretty sure those are very reasonable questions.
Hey what does it mean when you put Chester on the background to the attic side
Chairman: Blah Blah Blah
Mark Zuckerberg: Ok Boomer
How does anyone not understand that he would not be charging you to have your data private but he would be charging to use facebook without ads?
Ambrose because they don’t understand that there is immense costs to running facebook. It’s a simple concept in marketing: if you’re not paying for the product, you are the product
I kinda feel bad for Mark. He has to answer questions like that politely and politically when he probably wants to tear out his hair with how pointless a lot of those questions seemed.
I disagree, they are baiting him into statements, for example he said that we are the owners of our data, that's something that can be used against him in a number of ways and limits his options, i found that to be true with most of the questions. They want stronger restrictions, policies and laws, the only way to get that is to force him, that's what this whole thing is about else they'd still just be talking in his office
I think some of you are just missing the point of all this and are taking the questions way too literally.
Gerberger The only way to provide ads is to give away your data.
Gerberger I know how advertisements work. They appear as they are based on what you do, like, spend time on, could be interested in, and so on. It's intended to give the user a more streamlined, personal, and beneficial experience. Various websites track how you use the site and adjusts itself accordingly to suit your demands and desires so long as the core functionality is not changed. Certain TH-cam videos appear depending on what you have watched and liked in the past. The same goes for advertisements.
You are giving advertisers and the site data no matter what you do without actively blocking out the tracking requests by getting NoScript and a typical adblocker. It is not false information; it is how sites and advertisements work. The burden of proof is on your side, now.
Next get the Director of the CIA and FBI to answer what they do with all the data they are collecting and how much they collect. And why they are collecting all pictures of every person alive ?
TopEvt not every person, and mostly people don't even look through their pictures because of how much pictures there are
How do you know all this mr knowitall?
Why bother with data scraping when Facebook can handle it for you?
OMG, IT'S ALL A CONSPIRACY!!!
The govment gon come an tek yer baby!
well theyre definitely auto searching keywords in private messages and all posts public and private.
Unpopular opinion: did everyone overlooked the fact that you provide any info in any platform means that you somehow exploit your privacy? Yes, Facebook has some huge issues on it but why do they isolate the case? If they really wanna make a difference and "protect privacy" they should also take some actions with social media giants or the military who basically do the same
Explain the last question someone
I watched this just to hear what Zuck sounds like. Exactly how I imagined.
how did you just hear his voice for the first time now when he's been around since '04?
Kermit The Frogg
An alien overlord in a kermit the frog suit in a Mark Zuckerberge suit
Nathan Locke *Zucc**
zucc
Facebook to me is just a huge meme storage
same. created a fake account just for reacting to memes.
hari still has access to what your looking at because Facebook breaks there privacy laws and looks through what your looking at on googlw
lifeworkerJudgement intruth it's not facebook looking at what you search. When you search or browse the internet, it creates cookies and I think the ads that you see is based on the cookies stored in your browser.
Most memes on Facebook are stolen from Reddit
This is true
This sounds exactly like me trying to explain how a computer works over skype to my grandparents
“This is because of your hair”
They're all playing on the same team. This is just a little pony show to appease the public.
One Love lol
Yeah man they are all connected and want to screw the public.
One Love: that was my first thought. I mean, cmon...everyone has a price in this arena unfortunately.
Unbelievable, so much lying especially that they don't work with the government, that if you close the account they delete all the data that they collected of you and that they don't listen to your conversation or texting on whatsapp ( yes it's encrypted but they got the code and if you talk about let say sunglasses, the next day you get sunglasses advertisements on Facebook ),
And the Senators went way to easy on him, you can tell the his lobbyists where hard at work plus the Senators probably feared him because they all use Facebook and need it for getting elected again.
A thousand of us closed our accounts and suedFacebook for 50 million dollars.
The truth is that I had an account but never used it but I've been using WhatsApp a lot together with a personal VPN, never trusted him or his Facebook after learning how he stole Facebook which was not belong to him at the first place.
Plus I'm not a fool letting everyone know everything about me.
One Love agree with you 100%
If you don't want Facebook to monetise on your private information, It's simple, don't use it!
Sciencent Productions yep!
...or just disable it, because there's a setting for that.
Grant Gryczan you are pretty naive
I'm also a full-stack web developer.
Sciencent Productions
youre hell smart ay, can u please cure cancer ?
Mark did so well to analyze each of the questions and provide more insight in his answers!
Oh yes he did so well in censoring. Still asleep?
I just came from the bad lip reading and now I can’t take this serious 😂
He actually answers the questions, unlike politicians who totally change the subject of a question.
Victor Valencia Pretty much what he was doing, especially at the end.
Victor Valencia You only watched the highlights. Watch the whole thing. Lmao
So politicians are more evil over this fish head?
Did you listen to the very end?
Manajust4fun They didn't even let him answer
The last bit summed up:
Sen: Do you agree with me?
Zucc: Not completely
Sen: Yes or No?
Zucc: It's not as easy as that
Sen: I disagree, you're wrong, I'm right, I'll keep arguing my point without hearing your reasons.
Here let me help Zuck...
Sen: "Do we need a law - "
Zuck: "No."
@@cf2851 that's it, the senator asked if there should be a straightforward LAW regulation for processing children data, that was the question. Zuckerberg answered "for the good of the people, there should, but it would shrink the range of my company's power so nope, just nope. Biiig nope".
We don't need a law. It's as simple as that. Kids should be smart enough to decide what information they give to Facebook. The education system should explain the concept of privacy and also about cookies.
Except the senator is right
@@leofrancovich3892 isnt there a law for childrens data under q3
I WANT A “PUBLIC EXCEPT” OPTION
This ruined my memories of " the social network"
ZuccBot model v-452
testing results:
inconclusive
Gabe Anderson Yeah!
Haha
Gabe Anderson Powered by Google
😂😂😂
It tilted on 4 minute mark
It baffles me how incompetent these senators seem in having discussions, which is supposed to be almost the entire point of their job, aside from being informed about their topics, which they were also lacking in this case.
How are they expecting to get anything out of this hearing if they interrupt him on every possible occasion and don't even try to follow what he has to say about their poorly thought out questions?Obviously he can't go into detail because of NDAs or something and he doesn't want to make any problematic statement in front of the media to avoid shitstorm and taking his statements out of context. None of these questions can be answered with a simple yes or no.
A large practice in winning an argument (espicially in higher industries such as news reporting and politics) is to fluster your opponent, either by scaring them into a straightforward answer that they didn't want to give or not giving them a chance to give the answer they wanted to give, forcing a shortened version with potentially incorrent interpretations.
Sure, but that's not a practice a federal institution like a the senate should strive for, don't you think? An incorrect interpretation wouldn't help their cause, so why would they do that?
But it *would* help their cause, at the end of the day the government likely has its own motives over the public. And in order to sway opinions towards these motives it needs to do some trickery and make laws that it thinks are right rather than the general public. Take for example how hard that last guy was trying to force Zuckerberg to promote a potential new law in the works. For if they can obtain Zuckerberg's 'approval', then it would be much easier to get the public on board with it too.
The incorrect interpretation would allow the government and in extent the media to twist his words and sway the publics opinion.
"Zuckerberg says yes to U16 privacy regulation" would likely make everyone think he was on board with everything the government is going for with this law rather than the actual response Zuckerberg gave.
Alas, I digress. The main point is that governments are not beneath using underhanded tactics to promote what they think is right, or will get them more money (as corrupt as that may be), but that is a topic for another day.
Lunarios thank you!
These senators are exactly what the problem with the world is today! Stupid people pretending to know shit beyond them and exhibiting confidence! This is a time where self confidence is a bigger asset than deep knowledge itself!
It's like explaining to an old person how cookies works. Made me think of Ron Swanson.
he doesnt even blink dude what da fuq
reminds me of Elizabeth Holmes
Right after i read this cmmnt, i looked at him and he blinked..u r wrong..hahahahha
Cuz he’s a robot/lizard hybrid
it isn't zuckerberg's job to make laws. wtf were these questions.
jennifer g. lapan - You are kidding, right? If I run a multi-million or billion dollar company, I can contribute, pay-off, buy out a senator to promote a law that can benefit me. Why do you think there is no universal health care? Or why are we going to war? There are big corporations behind government decisions. FaceBook obviously has a big impact over consumer decisions.
Chris Gamarra ....EXACTLY!!
If you're not paying for a service, you are the product.
Love how they say targeted ads are “predatory” and “dangerous”.
The most “predatory” experience I’ve had with them is when I was getting ready to build my PC and I got an ad for a really cool case that I really liked. I ended up buying it (after weeks of research, not just on the spot) and I’ve loved it ever since.
Targeted ads allowed me to find a product I really love and still brag about all the time. Why is this predatory? If ad companies had access to my PRIVATE information (like my messages), then that would be bad. But real private stuff is encrypted and cant be used for ads. All that Facebook or Google can tell these companies is basic things that I am comfortable with people knowing. If I post on instagram that I can’t wait to buy a new computer, is it really sensitive personal information that I like computers?
2:14 Alright... Who made those subtitles?
Edit: Oh, Iwan did... WTF, bro!?
I like the Bad Lip Reading version of these highlights better......this is such a boring nonsense to watch
Citizen Mike why you comparing a joke video to a serious government video lmao
Citizen Mike I honestly couldn’t tell the difference
Kolos Kovacs Serious government video? Are you really this gullible? This whole hearing was bullshit political grandstanding. Nobody is forced to have a Facebook account.
kay jay I didn't say everyone was forced to have fb
kay jay nobody is forced to have a facebook account, no... But those who have an account had a right to privacy, along with other issues. This is a serious government issue because it puts a large amount of the US population's personal information at risk.
This was just sad. AI already outsmarting 800 year old geezers
Is that really how you viewed this? An artificial intelligence talking to 800 year old politicians? Never heard something so absurd and funny.
Guys McFellas He could give them a straight answer, but he didn't want to as this would definitely be used against him later on. By remaining vague he kinda answers the question but the senate doesn't get anything concrete to use against him.
Not a fair fight at all :/ I don't know how all the people in power in America are all idiots.
Marijn Vermeulen so in order words, he has bullshit answers that don't solve anything. If he had actual solutions, he wouldn't have to worry about it being "used against him".
Guys McFellas The senate is just questioning him in the hopes he'll mis-speak at some point so they can use it against him. Of course Zuckerberg knew of all the bad things happening all along and is just covering his ass right now.
Bruh I legit got a facebook ad before the video
More like 'Zuckerberg's Senate hearing highlights in the amount of time TH-cam requires us to get ads'
You should rename this video to "10 minutes of old men in the U.S. Senate having no idea of how the internet works".
Ole Hofsøy they do, but you are someone who does'nt know what this video is about.
Ole Hofsøy You obviously don't understand that Cuckerberg has been shutting down people of diffetent political opinions and shit himself when called on it
Lennard these men and women or other possibly, do not understand how facebook works for instance every one of these people in these seats do not realize that every single man women and child has a internet footprint that anyone including the FBI, parents, and employers can see and use as reasoning on being investigated, grounded, and not hired or fired, I do my best to keep my footprint or portfolio as clean and show me as a person of great responsibility and character so if a employer sees this he won't be turned off. On the internet you are not private, so don't post, click, or stream without realizing the consequences.
Il Tenore Yes many people need to learn myself included and that is the problem, not privacy and data breaches but misinterpreted protocols to get next to complete internet safety. The problem is ignorance (which is not bad everyone is ignorant on millions of topics.) ,the problem is a person to person basis. Many people need to take the time to learn basic fundamentals, others need better interpretation of methods which is Facebook's mistake, but in mass its a 50/50 issue that can only be fixed with 100% effort from both parties. The theory that I say is fundamental (which I assume you have heard a few times) that nothing is private, so we either learn to be mindful, or stop social media entirely. They brought up that professor guy who got information off of many people, I could go to Facebook look at your profile and learn a lot about you.
Ole Hofsøy how are they old
Just don’t use Facebook. It’s not essential. I don’t use it. Problem solved.
David Trvjiyo I’ve been saying this for years and no one has giving me a single good and essential use for it.
t1m3l0rd I'll tell you a goid essential way I use it. For news, and also know what's going on near by. Example, I live in Puerto Rico so ever since Maria we've been having power surge problem, I can know what's going on trhough what people post about the problem or what's going on outside of my country. It all depends on what you want to use. Waste time and see stupid meaningless post or follow good pages thaf gives actual news and follow friends that lives in the same country to know what's up around you.
David Trvjiyo every social media company is doing that, youtube ,google,amazon, insta,whatsapp,snachat!!! What will you stop using??? Anything free is being paid for by advertising.
BADASS MARIO newspaper, messenger pigeon.
David Trvjiyo lmao
why not google?
The word “Facebook” gives me the feeling of “Big brother is watching you” from the work 1984 by George Orwell.
The Social Network “Sequel” on the Works!
indeed or the new season of Billions on the works
yea, I fell like there's enough material for a new Sony/Columbia Pictures sequel, while FB keeps going on lieing to us daily.
YES PLEASE
The Social Network 2: The down ??
Dang Itshere why would we have to pay for something they took in the first place, uh sounds like extortion ya think? Hmh strange
Zuckerberg's most answers include:
a. No, I am not familiar with that.
b. I will have my team follow up with you.
Senators don't seem to have ideas on how facebook works. Zuckerberg lies on how it works and they rest their questions.
xlioilx no the government is a fascist for trying to regulate someone’s company... if users aren’t comfortable they can always stop using Facebook... Facebook makes money from ads so it can remain free, that’s exactly how google and TH-cam work as well as every company that provides ads... even television and radio... and they all gather some form of information to show you the most relevant ads... the government is just clueless and want to butt their head into everything and make new laws on everything... it’s sickening
Francisco valdez But Zuckerberg clearly couldn’t answer half the questions, I get the government shouldn’t be “butting their heads in” but how come it’s so hard for him to actually answer?
Sinify the reason he wasn’t answering was for legal purposes... they were asking questions in a way that if he answers he would admitting to their accusations... he needed to be careful to word his answers in a way that could not be interpreted in the wrong way
blumenthal Knows exactly how it works
Uhh... He answered the questions. If that wasn't clear, you may not understand his answers. The questions were uninformed, stupid, or both. These were ignorant Senators looking to make political gains rather than have an educated and informed investigation about how to better guard user information shared with social media platforms.
Whenever Zuckerberg tried to direct the investigation in that direction, he was interrupted.
3:24 Wait, what did you just say?
This conversation followed the oldest and most well-known rule in the book:
Ask a dumb question, get a dumb answer.
lizard boi apologizes for invading privacy to old bois who invade privacy on a daily basis (2018-colorized)
This is the best spoof I've watched in years. Zucksucksaman'sdingdong needs a nomination.
This look like the Iron man scene😂
;-; nani thats what i was thinkingg
Lmao yes
Minus all charisma a human can actually have
Except Tony Stark is a real human being. Not this... thing.
icyrycie official god damn it 😂😂😂😂😂
9:00
"Would you support a law yes or no"
"I think it's an important principle"
😭🤣
So AutoTune works for testimony also?
This is like watching a kid try and explain how the internet works to his grandfather.
Targeted ads aren't bad, putting adds onto a free service is also not bad.
Why is it Facebook's job to monitor what YOUR kids are doing online?
Isn't that called parenting?
If you ever have a kid, and got kidnapped or something, deal with it yourself. It's called parenting. Lol. Don't ever call the police.
Lust Snipe that's not the best example
@Ann Nguyen
I feel like 'bad example' that may be the story of his life.
Lust Snipe If i had a kid i would teach him how to defend himself and let him carry a knife etc to defend himself
So lets say you created a site that eventually became the origin of many kidnappings and pedo practices, would you still run it? Cause if you do I understand why you asking.
That counsel is so old they probably don’t even use the internet/ have a Facebook account
FrenchieFries no one has a facebook account except 30 y/o and parents
FrenchieFries Sooooo?
well it seems that the gov is trying to control the internet and these thriving companies or at least limit it. The internet is gr8 how it is. We still have net neutrality (for now), but if the gov tries to take that away from us and start to add regulations to companies like Facebook that can ruin the business model then say bye bye to sites like Facebook, twitter, insta, youtube, etc... cause they use analytics for their ads and ads pay the companies bills to keep it running.
Also I agree especially moms. Moms love facebook. I have an account that I haven't touched in 10 years lol. My mom made it back when I was like 8. But the point I was trying to make is that these guys are so old they probably don't understand the internet, the power of the internet, and the community of the internet.
FrenchieFries normally i would say i don’t like the government to control things, and i do not think the government should ever regulate the internet, but in this case they are doing a very good thing and protecting Americans from themselves. It’s amazing how people are such sheep when it comes to social media and don’t understand how detrimental it really can and is becoming. Maybe people like me who are old enough to remember what life was like before the internet can better understand this.
Nick Miller Nick Miller I remember how life was before internet. First decade of my life was internet free but the internet has opened so many opportunities. The internet has allowed so many people to create an online based business. The internet allows everyone to share info. You can learn about anything because it’s readily available on the internet. The internet being detrimental is an overstatement. Sure we all notice how mobile phones and social media has affected social life’s and how we interact but you really think the gov would do anything about that? No they wouldn’t. If they want to do anything it would probably be another tax or regulation to be placed for these large companies like Facebook.
I’m sorry but people being sheep with social media is also not totally accurate. Sure you can say that if most people use Facebook rather than twitter for dms then yeah people can be like sheep and just go straight to Facebook but at the base of it all it comes down to convenience and entertainment that satisfies the user. I.e back in the day you had to let your friends know where and when to meetup. Now you can send a quick text at any moment to update someone. (People generally take this over board and don’t talk to each other as much but that’s just based on personal limitations)
I get the feeling he's a good guy who got in way over his head. As the company and power of Facebook grew he probably made decisions he regretted and now he's being drilled for it. Not to mention that I'm sure sharing information with certain parties in exchange for benefits is very tempting. I'm sure governments have approached Facebook too. I've watched numerous of these clips and he remains very professional. On the other hand, you can sense when he's dodging a direct answer and it feels like he's very uncomfortable. Now being drilled is never comfortable, but if you followed your heart you've nothing to hide. He's talking in a way that avoids direct answers at times, which means he's hiding something/protecting/damage controlling.
Cut yourself the highlights: TH-cam "FaceBook Shareholder Meeting 31.5.2018 (Aktionärsversammlung)" - played some Amiga "Asteroids" meanwhile...
the zucc
*succ
zUCC
Marco Mark Productions zucc*
I hate that Mark stops and listens to them while they interrupt him all the time.
Burak Unutmaz let them!
Burak Unutmaz it's called respect which they couldn't do but Mark was doing ! It means people don't want to listen carefully but want to put their opinion only but Mark was listening fully after that he was replying so he can give a best answer of their some stupid questions
Shinsei Sunuwar
"best answer"
Such as
"Yes we got breached"
"No we're not going to fix it"
That's the reason why he became so wealthy. Because he listens to people.
they all have alotted time, so he is letting them ramble on so that he can run down their time and avoid questioning in deeper detail
“That is a fantastic question, prettygirl.”