There was a roman emperor. He had a brilliant idea of universal clothes for all of the slaves. His advisors told him:" Bad idea. They will understand they are majority".
@@tuzziosamson3601 that's why a lot of people do not take feminism serious. Because it is not serious. You have just proven my point. No chance at argument now.
I second that. He sat through that ridiculous attempt at intellectualism and it ended up as a hens talk with Peterson just rubbernecking back and forth...
He is amazing at allowing people to speak and allowing people to speak over him and try and put words in his mouth....then shuts them down in one sentence! Very smart man.
You are so right. I admire him for many reasons, but I think you nailed the number one. Listening to feminist drivel for over 50 years, I could never sit there and listen to those insufferable idiots pontificate while Peterson sat there. Does anyone actually interview anymore?
She is the definition of hears but doesn't listen. It's actual painful watching her force her pre agenda questions that have no relevance to Jordans answers
Thats the definition of an interviewer who had no intention of having an interview but rather trap the other person taking things out of context and framing questions as a gotcha
@@imo098765 It reminds me of a congressional hearing the other day. Some congressman asks an IRS whistle-blower for an explanation of the situation. The whistle-blower eagerly starts to explain what happened and he is immediately cut off. The man that asked the question says they don't have time for this explanation. LOL
she talks down to him. Like she's the mother & he's the out of line teenager. This is the delusion of modern feminism. That women are superior to men. Each gender is good in their own way. But they aren't superior to each other.
That's the biggest problem with most of the people that try to push these agendas. They're incapable of having an actual intelligent debate. Instead, they just memorize phrases that they don't completely understand and try to shoe-horn them into discussions.
Never forget these fools see this as a power struggle, a war on "oppression", and as the saying goes "all is fair in love and war" they seem to live by this with zero sense of honour or integrity. A pretty good way to see how the interviewer/show will be is how they refer to Dr Peterson, if they simply call him an academic or his name they are usually against him, If they refer to him as Doctor or professor they are either relatively neutral or in favour of him.
@@stardewdaisy4577 That's just him being himself, you're misunderstanding. Also if you can't decipher what I'm getting at then it's not worth my time to argue.
The best part is he has done more to help professional women in the high end workforce than any government. Ask him about it he'll tell you all about it.
The world is much like it always was: people are running away from responsibility and moral behavior. I think we are just much more aware of it because of the internet and social media. Because people can hide behind anonymity, they express what they really believe more frequently and as such we can see how immoral people really are. I really appreciate that there is at least on person out there campaigning for moral responsibility. I like that Jordan Peterson explains very clearly his REASONS why people should seek to be moral and even "noble" as he puts it, because too much of the dialogue I see online revolves around money, sex, and immediate gratification. He doesn't sound like he's sermonizing, but rather he's arguing for good, common sense so people are armed against life's calamities.
It isn’t ‘men’ that I’m speaking to. It’s people. I am a clinical psychologist. I am ACTUALLY interested in INDIVIDUALS. I’m interested in their fortification against tragedy. You can hear his sincerity as he’s saying these lines.
They sound like impatient confident children & he’s the only adult in the room. Many grown & young people I see all around sound like impatient children. We need more of this dude.
It's like watching an adult try to explain astronomy to a couple of 3 year old children, who think they are older than you because they were born in January, and you were born in August.
When Jordan Peterson was asked by the bully in high school "Do your parents know you're gay?" his response was "What do you mean by parents, and what do you mean by gay." This man is a master at avoiding manipulative questions and showing them for what they are.
Isn't this straw-manning his opposition? The same thing that others wrongly do to him at times? I'm a fan of Peterson (and also a progressive), but it's important to realize when any side of a debate is illogical, not just the side you agree with.
That’s a very good point, but calling it a weapon is far too much of a compliment. The thing is it’s not even a weapon nor a defense tactic. This feminist constantly interrupting him is the equivalent of a child covering their ears and screaming because they didn’t get their way. She just knows her bullshit argument is not valid or feasible, and that’s very applicable to many of these situations.
They're using all the female manipulative tactics in the book. Interrupting, potshotting, teaming up, twisting narratives, and repeat over and over, and got the nerve to act like they're educated.
Proceeds to misrepresent his opinion almost immediately, kinda ironic. Hate this superficial “gotcha” style of questioning that seems to pervade modern interviews.
This man has the rare gift of making very clear the problems with humanity and society, the cause of them, and what we can do about it. He makes so much sense the women don’t realise how foolish and ignorant they appear as he slices through their arguments with surgical precision, without any pompous air or pedantic arrogance. He simply wants people to see things as plain and as clearly as he sees them.
Of course that's a problem too. I SAW A video where woman was saying they are changing words Like why HUMAN has man in it. WHY woman has man in it. Female etccc. WAS SO stupid
@@cambelasben Jesus f*cking Christ 🤦♀️ They're really going out of their way to find a problem. They always say "making progress" and yet they will NEVER be satisfied, its like they're skating up a hill.
@@LittleMissHoop Most of them do, yes. And no surprise, because the average person just buys whatever is being sold by the mainstream media. High quality individuals, who think for themselves instead are not many.
Im so thankful for men like Dr Peterson and modern stoics like Ryan Holiday for giving young men a solid foundation to grow from. I pray for the next generation coming up behind me and i hope they dont fall in the same traps our generation did
Needed to continue the interview. Please, is there a a second interview? He will hear one of their comments/arguments, understand their words and multiple possibilities of what they may have meant, unpacks them with "if's" to clarify and although his may or may not be a rebuttal he also explains what is important.
Because they see only what they want to see. They protest, shout and scream about everything in the west but then turn a blind eye and don't utter a word when it comes to how eastern countries treat women. This woke, left wing, PC culture is killing the west. The people of western countries are increasingly losing the right to see and think as they see fit and it's terrifying that it's happening
@@grandadmiralthrawn9231 Actually, most intersectional feminists will tell you that women being abused in Eastern countries does not in any way negate or "cancel out" women being abused differently in western countries. It's not an either/or. Women are abused quite differently depending on the culture, that should be obvious- but you are all missing it, as usual. Ms. Jordan-a Peterson is saying "since lung cancer is more deadly than breast cancer, breast cancer is not bad at all and people with breast cancer shouldn't whine and bother doctors about it- it's not like they have lung cancer". Anybody with 2 brain cells to rub together can see that this is a strawman's fallacy. Unfortunately very few of Ms. Jordan-a Petersons's followers HAVE 2 brain cells and so they miss that entirely. Just because somebody is abused in a different way elsewhere, does not make abuse here okay. duh.
the woman on the left is a supporter of him. She is listening and liking what he says. When it preaches each others arguments they over ride the others statement to make it facts. The woman on the right ended up shutting down the woman on the left and Jordan because she had no control in the debate and the other 2 saw eye to eye on how society sits
@@jackknopf5974 i can PARTIALLY agree. I believe women deserve freedom of opportunity and speech. So does that woman on the left, so does Jordan. There are intelligent women who deserve a lot, not many unfortunately but when u see them you shouldn't generalize them
@@CRAZYN1NJA the problem with that statement is that if your siding with those women who claim to be feminists, they are far too ignorant to see that what they are trying to get rid of is that they are just passing it onto men hence them constantly ignoring Jordan. They are an example why feminists are treated the way they are nowadays however there are a small collective of feminists who aren't hypocritical of what they try to debate for
This is such an old video, but it's so insane to me how IMMEDIATELY hostile the program is towards him, they set the stage by essentially making fun of him, implying his TH-cam channel grew because of his views on free speech and stuff. Insanity
You know what’s hilarious? If roles reversed, a lone feminist with two male hosts talking over her argument, it’d be called mansplaining. But because it’s two feminists talking over a male guests argument, it’s something else.
Its a trigger for me when u are trying to articulate ur point and get hit with another idiotic ideology from these feminist. They don't listen they just yell their points
@@TheWaross He sounds like a perfectly normal person to me. You however come painfully across as a standard issue liberal eccentric with the usual pseudo-moralistic hyperbole. Hope things get better for you, friend.
For real, imagine being a guest in a TV show, then you always become interrupted by the interviewers. Its okay to interrupt someone as long as you know your place and when you should interrupt. The way I see this is the interviewers being so fckn rude most of the time (not always)
uhh women just talk, they don't listen, even if they let you talk they don't listen to you, they actually only think about what they will say after the man finishes and they can't wait until he finishes.. bruh.
How can u interview someone and not look at them…. And to interrupt and talk over him when his telling you you are not expressing his option as he stated it…There’s such a difference in the level of intelligence between him and the two ladies it’s so infuriating
@@JA-ou7nt Aaah! But by simply criticising her, as an individual, you have shown you are a misogynistic, sexist, bigoted pig. You will be dragged before the Ministry of Truth and re-programmed so you will think exactly as you are told!
Its sad when you only focus on what you are saying, and trying to only get your point across. Rather than trying to understand any counter or reasoning in opposition to your own opinion.
He is right. Equality in opportunities is just, equality in outcome is discrimination. You will have to stop looking for the best people for the job if you need to fill a certain quota (whether that is based on gender, skin color, sexuality or other wise).
I've always thought that to be the most common feminist attitude... Male or female, shouting and shutting down conversations they don't like is their thing.
It's sad that this IS feminism now. These people are ruining what feminism is meant to be. It's all about equality but these morons only want to put men down and make the world soft.
Isn't it AMAZING how - as soon as he says something that they disagree with - they INSTANTLY start talking OVER him, interrupting him and cutting him off?
The most interesting thing here, Tyrone McDonald, is the genuine intelligence gap between Jordan and Tyrone McDonald. Labeling anyone who disagrees with dr. Peterson as a troll clearly identifies you as an unthinking individual and therefore you have nothing of value to share.
Lorraine Connor that’s so sweet Lorraine I’m Guessing you disagree with Jordan who presents a common logic standpoint and anyone who shares common logic is somehow dumb to you ! Must be why I have over 500 likes on this thread and you are alone.
A city plumber came by to REPAIR old water pipes that had burst in the city street. Water still leaked. Six years later the city gets a nice big GRANT to repair OLD pipes. City plumber came out again to REPAIR leaks in the street. Water still leaked. Water leaks in the street. Lots of unanswered questions, same old problems, lots of money poured into repairs, and years later... here we are
it's like they just completely instantaneously forget about each mini debate and move onto their next attempt. They ask a question to which he answers and disproves their argument and then in a split second they realise they have no counter argument and move to phase E like nothing ever happened
It's questions like that, that make identity politics such a nightmare because everyone immediately assumes that they have the same beliefs on what a "Real" this, that or the other is.
I think this is precisely one of the things feminists are asking ni terms of mentality changes. To stop rationalise everything by facts and numbers all the time and start to accept that feelings intuition and sensibility are things that matter and take a big place in our society and must be taken in consideration on the public and private sphere. Sorry for my english :)
She herself says it without realizing, “do you think a trans woman is a *_real_* woman?” She knows the difference between trans woman and *_real_* woman. 🤷🏻♂️
Yeah that was the absolute dumbest baited response I've ever seen. Even before he said it I knew he'd disagree with the term "real," and I knew she'd put words in his mouth. Most conservatives actually care MORE about transexuals than most liberals, because they care more about ALL people than such liberals. Liberals just use these people for their collectivized political power it comes to identity politics
Equality of outcome means, it doesn't matter what I do, I will always get as much as everyone who does more than me and everyone who does less than me....
She's doing her job tbh, she seems to stand by his perception but if it was an agreeable interview there wouldn't be any debate cos the feminist is simply a representative figure as she's barely got anything relevant to say
@@Carteirapesada why do you feel it is her job to be disagreeable? If she has the result already loaded, it is not helpful in any way, both sides should be open minded to explore new ways of thinking. This is the biggest problem with left leaning politics these days, no critical thinking. Watch the talks he has with other guests on the Rubin Report and you will see how ideas can develop without pointless drama.
Simple truth is I think logic has been curtailed and in its place is this emotionally charged out of control hysteria, I have just finished watching several of his videos so if I am sounding like Jordan I didn't intend to, where logic is more or less a luxury that gets thrown aside whenever the logic isn't working for you but against you. Militant atheism is a classic example of this. If the atheist isn't winning the argument logically then he resorts to troll tactics. I see anti- Christian groups doing the exact same thing in the exact same way. Look at how keyboard jihadis are going after guys like David Wood. It's sad because the whole purpose of logic is to create a method to get at the truth in many ways debaters should be looking forward to being wrong because yeah you had a set back in your conclusions but you got one step closer to the truth even if it's not a truth you would prefer it is still a truth.
@@asgaiyawaya3973 Agree. I call them the emotional mob. They are so emotionally invested in their beliefs, facts and logic are unnecessary. People are guilty until proven guilty, if they do not conform to the neo-marxist views.
Conservative women tend to be more logical. Liberal women , not so much. Having said that , Women will always go the emotional hook if they cannot get their way using common sense. Time for you men to use their emotion against them. .@@asgaiyawaya3973
I’m not a feminist but I think that the world does associate blue with boys and pink with girls, of course girls wear blue and guys wear pink but it’s just a concept that dates back in history.
In her defence. That’s actually a specific reference to her former boss Harriet Harman who got flack from feminists for being patronising when she used pink busses and billboards to promote equality for women.
@@Dilkingt0nne And yet that identifies another hypocrisy of the new feminist movement. They speak as though all of them are strongly united, yet are willing to outcast any person who go against the radical left's rhetoric.
JP didn’t “dismantle” feminism by any stretch of the word. He agrees that women should have the same opportunities as men. Where he diverges is in transgenderism.
That's what feminist do! Feminist ask questions they don't really want the answers to, they interrupt to shorten your answer, they talk over you thinking that's a win because you can't get your point across. That might work on their husbands but in the real world they just look childish.
Study true history... feminism, communism, fascism... all come from the same tribe of Babylonians claiming to be the Chosen People of God, and our Masters!
Especially in the face of emotionally charged females; of both sexes. Men like JP are better, I think than those of us who would have the overwhelming urge to slap a b|+€H.
This woman speaks as if Hillary has never done anything wrong, compaired to Trump's affair. Hillary says things just as rude as he does but these women give her a pass just because she is a woman. Both male and female do things wrong but feminist only see the males wrong but women get a pass just because they are NOT male. Feminist have become the things they started out blaming males for and they are just as wrong as the males were.
The reason why equality of outcome is bad is fundamentally because men and women are different, and as soon as two groups are different then equality of outcome is impossible, the persuit of it becomes hurtful therefor. The push is actually rooted and linked to the idea that there is no difference between men and women, further linked to the idea that there is no objective reality.
Feminist: "Of course, I'm a feminist. My dress is pink."
*Sets women back 100 years
She was being satirical and ironic. Her statement was not meant to be taken seriously.
@@tuzziosamson3601 trust me, no one is taking her seriously.
There was a roman emperor. He had a brilliant idea of universal clothes for all of the slaves. His advisors told him:" Bad idea. They will understand they are majority".
@@tuzziosamson3601 that's why a lot of people do not take feminism serious. Because it is not serious. You have just proven my point. No chance at argument now.
Feminists claim that the color pink is sexist
Jordans greatest strength isn't his intellect, it's his patience. My God.
I second that. He sat through that ridiculous attempt at intellectualism and it ended up as a hens talk with Peterson just rubbernecking back and forth...
Kyle Mouttet absolutely
He is amazing at allowing people to speak and allowing people to speak over him and try and put words in his mouth....then shuts them down in one sentence! Very smart man.
I love his views.
You are so right. I admire him for many reasons, but I think you nailed the number one. Listening to feminist drivel for over 50 years, I could never sit there and listen to those insufferable idiots pontificate while Peterson sat there. Does anyone actually interview anymore?
She is the definition of hears but doesn't listen. It's actual painful watching her force her pre agenda questions that have no relevance to Jordans answers
Thats the definition of an interviewer who had no intention of having an interview but rather trap the other person taking things out of context and framing questions as a gotcha
@@imo098765 It reminds me of a congressional hearing the other day. Some congressman asks an IRS whistle-blower for an explanation of the situation. The whistle-blower eagerly starts to explain what happened and he is immediately cut off. The man that asked the question says they don't have time for this explanation. LOL
she talks down to him. Like she's the mother & he's the out of line teenager. This is the delusion of modern feminism. That women are superior to men. Each gender is good in their own way. But they aren't superior to each other.
@@imo098765Poor Jordy got destroyed.
love how u out it with emphasis on 'gotcha'@@imo098765
He didn’t destroy them, he respectfully corrected their false belief’s by employing facts and research data.
You ask him a baited question, and then you don't let him answer. Then you reach a conclusion for him. Interesting!
That's the biggest problem with most of the people that try to push these agendas. They're incapable of having an actual intelligent debate. Instead, they just memorize phrases that they don't completely understand and try to shoe-horn them into discussions.
Absolutely
@@Jason-po7on Yup. A lot of university-fed androids.
Just ask them to clarify.
Never forget these fools see this as a power struggle, a war on "oppression", and as the saying goes "all is fair in love and war" they seem to live by this with zero sense of honour or integrity.
A pretty good way to see how the interviewer/show will be is how they refer to Dr Peterson, if they simply call him an academic or his name they are usually against him, If they refer to him as Doctor or professor they are either relatively neutral or in favour of him.
"Quick, interrupt him before he makes another good point"
true, I got the same feeling from this.
What makes me laugh is feminists claim this is cis behavior to interrupt so much.
Lmao big facts
@@stardewdaisy4577 Well if you want to compare it's like an adult talking to pair of 5-year-olds. Sometimes they need to be taught.
@@stardewdaisy4577 That's just him being himself, you're misunderstanding. Also if you can't decipher what I'm getting at then it's not worth my time to argue.
He became popular with his brain, his logic,his calmness… thank you M Peterson !
And now he is benzo addict ranting and raving on twitter
Your brilliant supposition? Probably by a jealous liberal !
@@michael3885He’s not addicted anymore lol. Anybody can get addicted to something, that doesn’t take away the credibility of their claims.
@@michael3885so what you're saying is that if someone messes up once, they're not redeemable?
@@HouseOfHockey14 unless it turned their brain to Swiss cheese, and judging from the 50 rambling tweets a day he now posts, he is past his prime
What I admire most about Jordan Peterson is his patience when dealing with non-academic people. No way I could be that patient.
Facts, you can see it in his eyes like "why I'm I talking to these unsmart apes"
Non-academic? Those women went to universities too but they are blinded by their ideologies... that's different
@@whocares2465no one can find an intellectual idea by Peterson.
Now days academics are WORSE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I've watched him dismantle many of those as well...
@@AquaStevae No one can find an intellectual idea by JP
Dear women, stop speaking for me. Sincerely, a woman.
Sincerely*
@@x_zerzex7556 I thank you :)
A single name as an exclamation. What unearthly self-confidence is this?
@@GodsMistake Don't try to dim my shine.
And for me too🙂❤
The reason this guy is so popular is because our world has gone mad and he's saying what most of us are thinking but very eloquently
The best part is he has done more to help professional women in the high end workforce than any government.
Ask him about it he'll tell you all about it.
The world is much like it always was: people are running away from responsibility and moral behavior. I think we are just much more aware of it because of the internet and social media. Because people can hide behind anonymity, they express what they really believe more frequently and as such we can see how immoral people really are. I really appreciate that there is at least on person out there campaigning for moral responsibility. I like that Jordan Peterson explains very clearly his REASONS why people should seek to be moral and even "noble" as he puts it, because too much of the dialogue I see online revolves around money, sex, and immediate gratification. He doesn't sound like he's sermonizing, but rather he's arguing for good, common sense so people are armed against life's calamities.
MAD IS BEING TOO KIND.
Absolutely.
Yes, finally someone educated enough to represent COMMON SENSE AND SANITY!
He explains the answer clearly and concisely, she then completely ignores that and then makes her own conclusions 💀 lol
Ignorance is rampant
She looks like an old geezer in a dress 👗 to me
It isn’t ‘men’ that I’m speaking to. It’s people. I am a clinical psychologist. I am ACTUALLY interested in INDIVIDUALS. I’m interested in their fortification against tragedy.
You can hear his sincerity as he’s saying these lines.
The level of passive aggressive energy from the host is cringe on steroids.
mannix flint I’d take a Rancid Cow to bed compared to...... that ... ‘ thing’ any day.....
-''One of our guest of the day is a man you may recognize or maybe you don't'' Wow, wha a kind human being she is. /s
Yeah us Brits are really good at being passive aggressive. She's actually quite bad at it.
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
I've not even watched the debate, and it's already obvious...
Suddenly the British accent doesn't sound so intelligent.
Sounds very "naggy" Lol
Trust me we have millions of dumb people over here, these women literally represent the norm
Brilliant.
Lol, this comment made my day :)
sounds like sheeet
i always suffer watching him in this situation but he brilliantly go through this interviews, a true man to be inspired by.
They sound like impatient confident children & he’s the only adult in the room. Many grown & young people I see all around sound like impatient children. We need more of this dude.
Every debate Peterson is in looks like he’s the sober guy talking with drunks
Try to watch him debating with Sam Harris or Matt Dillahunty
@@averroes238 Pssh those guys are hacks lol
Yea, haha pretty much. Goodness!
When i'm drunk i turn into a feminist, i love women when drunk and agree with everything they say!!
That is the comment that should be on top!
It's like watching an adult try to explain astronomy to a couple of 3 year old children, who think they are older than you because they were born in January, and you were born in August.
The BeardedFetus 👌👌😂😂😂
perfect analogy
LOL hilarios. Best comment, best name.
Lol....
Smashed it out of the park with that analogy. LOL! You made my day.
if you want to be a good lawyer, study psychology then go to law..
Well done Jordan.
When Jordan Peterson was asked by the bully in high school "Do your parents know you're gay?" his response was "What do you mean by parents, and what do you mean by gay."
This man is a master at avoiding manipulative questions and showing them for what they are.
i always responded with yes
Interviewer:Is a circle a triangle?
Jordan: No
Interviewer: You’re racist
Dayuum,nice one!!!
That’s shapist!!! I’m offended!!!
Isn't this straw-manning his opposition? The same thing that others wrongly do to him at times?
I'm a fan of Peterson (and also a progressive), but it's important to realize when any side of a debate is illogical, not just the side you agree with.
@@NikeMike80 I'm not a shapist! Just a shape realist...
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Feminist's best weapon: Interrupting anyone whos about to dominate them.
Timothy Lalthanmawia not wrong
That’s a very good point, but calling it a weapon is far too much of a compliment. The thing is it’s not even a weapon nor a defense tactic. This feminist constantly interrupting him is the equivalent of a child covering their ears and screaming because they didn’t get their way. She just knows her bullshit argument is not valid or feasible, and that’s very applicable to many of these situations.
Oh I bet feminists love being dominated lol
They're using all the female manipulative tactics in the book. Interrupting, potshotting, teaming up, twisting narratives, and repeat over and over, and got the nerve to act like they're educated.
They want dominance, not equality.
They just cannot let him speak, it is absolutely pathetic to watch.
She twists, she turns, she tries to distort his points and misquote him, but he's having none of it. Made her look quite the fool.
Interviewer: “Do you think your opinion has been misrepresented in the past?”
Jordan: “Yes”
Interviewer: *Proceeds to misrepresent his opinion*
That's Mr. Represented to you.
I dont even call it an interviewer.
Jonathan Vachon so true man, that is a title she doesn’t deserve
Proceeds to misrepresent his opinion almost immediately, kinda ironic. Hate this superficial “gotcha” style of questioning that seems to pervade modern interviews.
💯💯💯
Let’s not praise him for “destroying” people, but for educating people which is his primary aim.
He’s destroying sjws and feminists
Destruction is usually a good teacher
@@anantaks.s4655 I'd say deconstruction is more on the mark, followed by reconstructing.
Yes, I agree
Well said
This man has the rare gift of making very clear the problems with humanity and society, the cause of them, and what we can do about it. He makes so much sense the women don’t realise how foolish and ignorant they appear as he slices through their arguments with surgical precision, without any pompous air or pedantic arrogance. He simply wants people to see things as plain and as clearly as he sees them.
💯💯💯💯
“Ship master, they outnumber us 3 to 1”
“Then it is an even fight”
The interviewer be like: You are sexist because your name is Jordan Peterson and not Jordan Peterdaughter.
Of course that's a problem too. I SAW A video where woman was saying they are changing words Like why HUMAN has man in it. WHY woman has man in it. Female etccc. WAS SO stupid
@@cambelasben Jesus f*cking Christ 🤦♀️ They're really going out of their way to find a problem. They always say "making progress" and yet they will NEVER be satisfied, its like they're skating up a hill.
@@ParallelElle Its true. Check * Purdue writing guide say avoid use of word man* she is crazy.
Benie please send a link. I want to cringe me to sleep. Thank you
@@conrie0110 I dont know how to send link here. But just search on TH-cam.
Purdue writing guide says valid use of word man.
It's on fox news youtube
As a woman, my goal in life is to not be ANYTHING like this interviewer.
Off to a good start, that's certainly one of the traits your man would cherish you for.
@@Xlife018 Thanks. Few men seem to notice those of us who are not like this...or maybe they assume we all are? (the sad mgtow and all....)
@@LittleMissHoop Most of them do, yes. And no surprise, because the average person just buys whatever is being sold by the mainstream media.
High quality individuals, who think for themselves instead are not many.
Do you have an Ig or something? I would love to meet a girl like that. :)
Oh, approach in the comment section. *Grabs popcorn*
He is so fucking intelligent good lord this guy always knows how to compose himself and ALWAYS says the right thing
Im so thankful for men like Dr Peterson and modern stoics like Ryan Holiday for giving young men a solid foundation to grow from. I pray for the next generation coming up behind me and i hope they dont fall in the same traps our generation did
Interviewer: So you are racist and sexist
Jordan: That’s not -
Interviewer: We are out of time
Louie ikr like wtf.
So true 😂😂
yeah the presenter is so rude and set in her beliefs she wont even let Jordan speak
in a fucking nutshell
This but tomorrow's headline will be "Jordan Peterson doesn't deny he's racist and sexist"
“Are you a feminist?”
“Yes, absolutely i’m a feminist”
*Jordan takes a sip of coffee*
Jordan’s mind: Here we go
I LOVE this comment
I would give you 500 likes if I could
Exactly what I thought 😂
here we go again
She says she wears a pink dress because she's a feminist, but isn't feminism about fighting _against_ stereotypes?
Needed to continue the interview. Please, is there a a second interview? He will hear one of their comments/arguments, understand their words and multiple possibilities of what they may have meant, unpacks them with "if's" to clarify and although his may or may not be a rebuttal he also explains what is important.
Jordan Peterson is too smart for these women. It’s very unfortunate that they’re baiting him and missing his points.
Jordan: Makes a great point on Scandinavian countries
Women: Let’s ignore that
F3minist logic
‘That answer doesn’t paint you in the light I want so we’re gonna move on’
She had no response to that 🤣🤣
Because they see only what they want to see. They protest, shout and scream about everything in the west but then turn a blind eye and don't utter a word when it comes to how eastern countries treat women. This woke, left wing, PC culture is killing the west.
The people of western countries are increasingly losing the right to see and think as they see fit and it's terrifying that it's happening
@@grandadmiralthrawn9231 Actually, most intersectional feminists will tell you that women being abused in Eastern countries does not in any way negate or "cancel out" women being abused differently in western countries. It's not an either/or. Women are abused quite differently depending on the culture, that should be obvious- but you are all missing it, as usual.
Ms. Jordan-a Peterson is saying "since lung cancer is more deadly than breast cancer, breast cancer is not bad at all and people with breast cancer shouldn't whine and bother doctors about it- it's not like they have lung cancer".
Anybody with 2 brain cells to rub together can see that this is a strawman's fallacy.
Unfortunately very few of Ms. Jordan-a Petersons's followers HAVE 2 brain cells and so they miss that entirely. Just because somebody is abused in a different way elsewhere, does not make abuse here okay. duh.
They're not listening. They're trying so hard to paint a bad picture of him that they look dumb doing it.
the woman on the left is a supporter of him. She is listening and liking what he says. When it preaches each others arguments they over ride the others statement to make it facts. The woman on the right ended up shutting down the woman on the left and Jordan because she had no control in the debate and the other 2 saw eye to eye on how society sits
Feminists are dumb by default. Think of a man, and take away reason and accountability.
@@jackknopf5974 i can PARTIALLY agree. I believe women deserve freedom of opportunity and speech. So does that woman on the left, so does Jordan. There are intelligent women who deserve a lot, not many unfortunately but when u see them you shouldn't generalize them
@@CRAZYN1NJA the problem with that statement is that if your siding with those women who claim to be feminists, they are far too ignorant to see that what they are trying to get rid of is that they are just passing it onto men hence them constantly ignoring Jordan. They are an example why feminists are treated the way they are nowadays however there are a small collective of feminists who aren't hypocritical of what they try to debate for
They’re afraid
For feminists, it's all about equality until the ship is sinking and the captain yells "Women and children first!!"
That was a rule put in place because men just pushed women out the way. That is not a testament for the good of man, quite the opposite, actually.
This is such an old video, but it's so insane to me how IMMEDIATELY hostile the program is towards him, they set the stage by essentially making fun of him, implying his TH-cam channel grew because of his views on free speech and stuff. Insanity
You know what’s hilarious?
If roles reversed, a lone feminist with two male hosts talking over her argument, it’d be called mansplaining. But because it’s two feminists talking over a male guests argument, it’s something else.
I love the word "mansplaining" it cracks me up ,it just makes the feminists seem dumber.
It's just projecting, they are almost always the ones womansplaining
They dont like double standards unless they are the beneficiary
yup... that's totaly true...
Well that becomes more of a hot topic . Very very hot one
This literally pains me. Not him, the feminists. My soul cringes every time they interrupt him, his patience is made of titanium.
Its a trigger for me when u are trying to articulate ur point and get hit with another idiotic ideology from these feminist. They don't listen they just yell their points
If that discussion triggers you so much, you are a pretty weak minded individual. Quite pathetic
@@TheWaross He sounds like a perfectly normal person to me. You however come painfully across as a standard issue liberal eccentric with the usual pseudo-moralistic hyperbole. Hope things get better for you, friend.
For real, imagine being a guest in a TV show, then you always become interrupted by the interviewers. Its okay to interrupt someone as long as you know your place and when you should interrupt. The way I see this is the interviewers being so fckn rude most of the time (not always)
uhh women just talk, they don't listen, even if they let you talk they don't listen to you, they actually only think about what they will say after the man finishes and they can't wait until he finishes.. bruh.
I like how jordan just say what the true definition of feminism is and the lady on the left, amongst others, associate feminism with a pink dress 😂
How can u interview someone and not look at them…. And to interrupt and talk over him when his telling you you are not expressing his option as he stated it…There’s such a difference in the level of intelligence between him and the two ladies it’s so infuriating
I used to be a big fan, but after watching THIS masterpiece, I’m a whole air conditioner
Fooled me in the first half, I have to say.
Copied this from Bali... unoriginal and you added cringe lol
@@leocarvalho8051 name me one thing that isn't considered sexists for the extremists feminist
@@nekogarou7474 extremist feminists
@@leocarvalho8051 you got me there xD
He's far too intelligent to be interviewed by these two.
They think they're smarter you can tell by how they speak and play off his response! Unfortunately they're idiots 😂
@@sarapatch616 you just gave a very good definition of an Idiot.
Here!!here!!
That presenter is one vile odious creature. Makes my skin crawl !
@@JA-ou7nt
Aaah! But by simply criticising her, as an individual, you have shown you are a misogynistic, sexist, bigoted pig. You will be dragged before the Ministry of Truth and re-programmed so you will think exactly as you are told!
He said it all with equality of opportunity. That’s very rational. The push for equality of outcome is unreasonable. He’s so intuitive, and correct.
I don’t think they listened to one word Peterson said.
Its sad when you only focus on what you are saying, and trying to only get your point across. Rather than trying to understand any counter or reasoning in opposition to your own opinion.
Well thats what feminist do they just throw stuff at you and refuse to learn bc their "beliefs" are "solid"
They're feminists...
Jake Avraham exactly my point. These talk shows are one sided. And the heading of this video is meaningless.
Basically a lot of his interviews
I love how she used her pink dress as proof of her being a feminist. Aren’t gender stereotypes like that something modern feminism is against
I think it was tongue in cheek m8
Well Femenism is like a dress, it's something pink to show, a banner
Exactly I noticed it too and badly wanted Jordan to refute her on that.
@@salaahkhayr2398 why are you pretending she wasn't joking?
She blatently was yet you want to act like she wasn't?
Pathetic
j ap lol I didn’t know feminists makes jokes against there own agendas now.
He is right. Equality in opportunities is just, equality in outcome is discrimination. You will have to stop looking for the best people for the job if you need to fill a certain quota (whether that is based on gender, skin color, sexuality or other wise).
If women are paid less than men, why isn't the workforce mainly women?
brilliant
Claims to be a feminist, interrupts Jordan every chance they get so he can’t finish a thought.
Reverse mansplaining??? Nobody thought it was possible until that day
I've always thought that to be the most common feminist attitude... Male or female, shouting and shutting down conversations they don't like is their thing.
Right they also didn’t listen to anything he said!
It's sad that this IS feminism now. These people are ruining what feminism is meant to be. It's all about equality but these morons only want to put men down and make the world soft.
@@kube410 reverse mansplaining is called "bitching".
She is not smart enough to realize she is not smart.
Daniel Roth Potent paradox.
man that was said by Charles Manson lol
It is dunning-kurger effect~
It’s a common affliction.
Dunning Kruger effect ! She thinks her cognitive ability is greater than it is.
in terms of intelligence these women came to a gun fight with their fists.
Isn't it AMAZING how - as soon as he says something that they disagree with - they INSTANTLY start talking OVER him, interrupting him and cutting him off?
The most interesting thing here is the genuine intelligence gap between Jordan and the two trolls.
Uh oh,thats sexist and morally outrageous of u!im ringing the Equality Police,better lawyer up 👍👍😂
Idiots =/= trolls.
The most interesting thing here, Tyrone McDonald, is the genuine intelligence gap between Jordan and Tyrone McDonald. Labeling anyone who disagrees with dr. Peterson as a troll clearly identifies you as an unthinking individual and therefore you have nothing of value to share.
Indeed
Lorraine Connor that’s so sweet Lorraine I’m
Guessing you disagree with Jordan who presents a common logic standpoint and anyone who shares common logic is somehow dumb to you ! Must be why I have over 500 likes on this thread and you are alone.
Jordan: ,,Man I love spaghetti"
Interviewer: ,,So it is clear that you support Mussolini"
🤣
Jordan: Im thirsty..i need a glass of water.
Interviewer: Hitler drank water...
@@simonlloyd7557 not only that, hitler was 70 percent water!
@@commondirtbagz7130 MEIN GOT!
Hahahahah
A city plumber came by to REPAIR old water pipes that had burst in the city street. Water still leaked. Six years later the city gets a nice big GRANT to repair OLD pipes. City plumber came out again to REPAIR leaks in the street. Water still leaked. Water leaks in the street. Lots of unanswered questions, same old problems, lots of money poured into repairs, and years later...
here we are
it's like they just completely instantaneously forget about each mini debate and move onto their next attempt. They ask a question to which he answers and disproves their argument and then in a split second they realise they have no counter argument and move to phase E like nothing ever happened
“Do you think a Transwoman is a REAL woman??”
Jordan Peterson: “No”
ALRIGHT CUT IT WE GOT THE CLIP
The question itself is so pervert
It's questions like that, that make identity politics such a nightmare because everyone immediately assumes that they have the same beliefs on what a "Real" this, that or the other is.
The way he takes a second to decide to take the hard stance is great
@@arquier they are going against their own agenda. What in the world could be a 'real woman' without offending someone by defining that
cut cut cut
The patients this guy has... and no, I didn’t misspell that.
Fuck, if I had women like that in my chair, I'd quit 😂
Genius
Lol👌
Made my day
Nisarg Sojitra aw cmon now you guys are making me blush ☺️
I'm a white person but i feel like a Asian inside. So now I identify as a Asian. As a result I became incredibly successful at math 😂
Those women wouldn't give Jordan Peterson a chance to finish a thought.
People are becoming too fragile to accept that their feelings aren’t facts!
Is that a Ben Shapiro reference
That statement is a paradox, in that the people who use it are the ones who are easily triggered 😁
I think this is precisely one of the things feminists are asking ni terms of mentality changes. To stop rationalise everything by facts and numbers all the time and start to accept that feelings intuition and sensibility are things that matter and take a big place in our society and must be taken in consideration on the public and private sphere.
Sorry for my english :)
@@juliusb5404 facts don’t care about your feelings
@@juliusb5404 Without rationalization, we'd still be in the dark ages, calling for our count to feed us more...
“do you think trans are real women”
"Well, how do you define real women"
"So you don't think they are real women"
He could have messed with their heads by pointing out that everything that exists is "real".
The emptiness inside a cup exist,is it real?.i just wanna know the answer
@@a.bagasm.7253 The cup isn't empty if it has Air inside it. If it has no air , it has light, if it has no light it has gravity acting on on it.
That's *deep* .thanks
@@a.bagasm.7253 You might like this. It blew my mind when I first watched it th-cam.com/video/cDmQINlntJ4/w-d-xo.html
Peterson literally call’s himself a feminist in this video.
If you think this qualifies as 'dismantling' someone's position, you still have a lot to learn about debating and logic in general.
She herself says it without realizing, “do you think a trans woman is a *_real_* woman?” She knows the difference between trans woman and *_real_* woman. 🤷🏻♂️
աėšłęÿ his answer: NO 😂😂😂😂😂😂
Fuck me - 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Good point
աėšłęÿ there we go mate
Yeah that was the absolute dumbest baited response I've ever seen. Even before he said it I knew he'd disagree with the term "real," and I knew she'd put words in his mouth.
Most conservatives actually care MORE about transexuals than most liberals, because they care more about ALL people than such liberals. Liberals just use these people for their collectivized political power it comes to identity politics
Good point
*looks at woman*
“are you a feminist”
“yes”
*Jordan takes drink of water* oh boy this gonna be a long one
Oh shit. Here we go again
Ten years later there Is no water left
@Liberty AboveAllElse was it '#yesidohaveacock'?
@Liberty AboveAllElse lol, that's the one, Baz & Mike
i expected *"wHY arE YOu gae?"* xD
Imagine getting old and not knowing what a woman is🤡🤡🤡
There are not several truths, there is one truth.
I have great admiration for Jordan Peterson for how he calmly deals with stupid people.
Me too.
I dont have the will power to do so sadly :(
Nah his tone is calm but you can clearly see he's regretting having to kill his brain cells talking to these two asshats.
@@crablord7934 'LOL' exactly!
Soo true
me too , id say YOU're FUCKED and walk away , LMAO
“Do you think a wolf is a rock”
- “No!”
“Why not?”
Interviewer: a wold is a rock. Why don’t you recognize the rocks existence?
DYING😭😭🤣🤣🤣🤣💀💀💀
Youre my friend now
I honestly can't answer that
Lolll
How is it possible for someone to keep his cool in a situation like this?
Equality of outcome means, it doesn't matter what I do, I will always get as much as everyone who does more than me and everyone who does less than me....
He's not "promoting his ideas" he's factually and logically reminding everyone what is real and what isnt
They are just ideas unless he can show evidence . Can one person have all the answers to society's problems?....No!
Isn't it sad that he even has to remind people. This world of ours is upside down. Wrong is now right and right is now wrong. How did this happen?
Same with the feminist movement
@@St_AngusYoung tolerance being manipulated by the intolerant.
@@Sandrocker exactly!!
The lady interviewing him is not interested in intelligent discussion, just trying to twist his words and contexts and generally being rude.
Its like when people punch you when you’re already knocked out, she has to win in any sense possible jeez.
Exactly
@Leroy B my guy
She's doing her job tbh, she seems to stand by his perception but if it was an agreeable interview there wouldn't be any debate cos the feminist is simply a representative figure as she's barely got anything relevant to say
@@Carteirapesada why do you feel it is her job to be disagreeable? If she has the result already loaded, it is not helpful in any way, both sides should be open minded to explore new ways of thinking. This is the biggest problem with left leaning politics these days, no critical thinking. Watch the talks he has with other guests on the Rubin Report and you will see how ideas can develop without pointless drama.
The fact that so many people don't understand the dangers of having equality of outcome as a goal. Is absolutely demoralizing.
That presenter came across as a complete self serving, judgemental tool.
Jordan always makes the mistake of thinking most people use logic to make decisions.
Simple truth is I think logic has been curtailed and in its place is this emotionally charged out of control hysteria, I have just finished watching several of his videos so if I am sounding like Jordan I didn't intend to, where logic is more or less a luxury that gets thrown aside whenever the logic isn't working for you but against you. Militant atheism is a classic example of this. If the atheist isn't winning the argument logically then he resorts to troll tactics. I see anti- Christian groups doing the exact same thing in the exact same way. Look at how keyboard jihadis are going after guys like David Wood. It's sad because the whole purpose of logic is to create a method to get at the truth in many ways debaters should be looking forward to being wrong because yeah you had a set back in your conclusions but you got one step closer to the truth even if it's not a truth you would prefer it is still a truth.
@@asgaiyawaya3973 Agree. I call them the emotional mob. They are so emotionally invested in their beliefs, facts and logic are unnecessary. People are guilty until proven guilty, if they do not conform to the neo-marxist views.
It's all frontier justice here on the internet.
Conservative women tend to be more logical. Liberal women , not so much. Having said that , Women will always go the emotional hook if they cannot get their way using common sense.
Time for you men to use their emotion against them. .@@asgaiyawaya3973
JP is right, people always use "their" logic, but they are wrong. It's like making a bad plan.
“Hence my pink dress”
Associating colors with genders is a great way to achieve equality I believe
Exactly lmao, if anything her saying that goes against feminist ideology
I’m not a feminist but I think that the world does associate blue with boys and pink with girls, of course girls wear blue and guys wear pink but it’s just a concept that dates back in history.
@@Laurel.m_ak its funny because it was the opposite in history. Blue-Girls Pink-Boys. funny how that works huh
In her defence. That’s actually a specific reference to her former boss Harriet Harman who got flack from feminists for being patronising when she used pink busses and billboards to promote equality for women.
@@Dilkingt0nne And yet that identifies another hypocrisy of the new feminist movement. They speak as though all of them are strongly united, yet are willing to outcast any person who go against the radical left's rhetoric.
The gish gallop at the end and then cutting off the interview is unreal
JP didn’t “dismantle” feminism by any stretch of the word. He agrees that women should have the same opportunities as men. Where he diverges is in transgenderism.
I love how feminist want men to stop interupting them but they just interupted him the whole time
1000% correct
Lol
Every. Single. Time.
Thats the only way the dumb and the idiots feel as they're winning. When the stupidity are about to be exposed, they try hard to shut him up
Of course. They want equality until the dinner bill hits the table or the tire goes flat on the highway.
"Hence my pink dress" - so she's a feminist but is also confidently admitting to conforming with female stereotypes... makes sense...
HAHAHAH never thought of that.. so fucking stupid
Ikr
Looks more purple than pink
That is not necessarily a contradiction tho. You can be a feminist and still choose to confirm with certain stereotypes.
@@AaaAaa-mh6zv they are the same people saying dresses aren’t just for women and that colour doesn’t have a gender. So yes it’s hypocritical
When a phd argues with 2 preschool students
No one has any right to tell someone what to say
Anyone who interviews JP doesn't actually listen to what he's saying.
Cause that's what they do, they don't listen and criticize you because you don't bow down at their absurdity
I mean you have a very pleasent podcast with Joe Rogan, but yes I don't think thats an interview, more like a simple talk at a bar drinking some beers
That's what feminist do! Feminist ask questions they don't really want the answers to, they interrupt to shorten your answer, they talk over you thinking that's a win because you can't get your point across. That might work on their husbands but in the real world they just look childish.
So what you're saying is....
They did
She seems like she's not listening to what he's saying. She's only paying attention to snippets of his answers that support her views
WomanListening. FeminazisHearing.
Boo Radley that’s facts
Boo Radley typical liberal 😂
She is trying to attack him
Do they ever listen?
The aggression and emnity is evident in her voice during the introduction.
Finland here, it's perfect for us and we can only laugh at the rest of the world lol
When you call yourself a feminist but then accidentally end up advocating for communism.
Exactly
Study true history... feminism, communism, fascism... all come from the same tribe of Babylonians claiming to be the Chosen People of God, and our Masters!
Same thing !
r/unexpectedcommunism
Accidently?
"A man you may recognize..or maybe you don't."
Peterson is literally the only person I recognize in this interview
A few days ago, I do not recognize this man.
I do now, and I will give him a 👍🏻
Facts
The way he flinches when she says that
In every way too
Me too
Coming from a woman, it's sad to see women like this interviewer, who are so intelligent and well-spoken to be such a sheep.
Undistinguished talk show host: "I feel..." JP "The data says". Media ignorance is a social blight.
I think JPs biggest strength is his ability to remain calm and articulate his arguments in a very rational manner.
@@skysolitude Exactly. He's combining belief with praxis, contemplation with action, inner and outer life harmony
Especially in the face of emotionally charged females; of both sexes. Men like JP are better, I think than those of us who would have the overwhelming urge to slap a b|+€H.
What arguments? Lol
This woman speaks as if Hillary has never done anything wrong, compaired to Trump's affair. Hillary says things just as rude as he does but these women give her a pass just because she is a woman. Both male and female do things wrong but feminist only see the males wrong but women get a pass just because they are NOT male. Feminist have become the things they started out blaming males for and they are just as wrong as the males were.
He has withheld many a bitchslap and I for one salute his patience.
Saying “Sorry” doesn’t make your interruptions less rude.
Right, it's merely acknowledging, "I caught myself in the act of doing you wrong, but I'm going to go ahead and do it anyway!"
It's like cutting in front of someone in a line and saying sorry. Then not going to the back of the line
Sometimes a person talks a bit much and journalists must interrupt for the sake of time.
@@LisaMaryification ...and sometimes not, as is the case here. Peterson never spoke for more than 15 seconds at a time.
All do is interrupt , at every level of the narrative, they “reword” almost everything he says.🤣
A woman is a human adult female, a man in a dress is not a human adult female.
The reason why equality of outcome is bad is fundamentally because men and women are different, and as soon as two groups are different then equality of outcome is impossible, the persuit of it becomes hurtful therefor. The push is actually rooted and linked to the idea that there is no difference between men and women, further linked to the idea that there is no objective reality.
So hostile to him to start with, and then they don't let him talk!