ไม่สามารถเล่นวิดีโอนี้
ขออภัยในความไม่สะดวก

Net Worth Explained | Don McMillan Comedy

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 ธ.ค. 2023
  • #wealth #networth #standupcomedy
    🌐Social Media🌐
    📶Facebook: / donmcmillan
    📶Twitter: / donmcmillan
    🤓Don’s Bio🤓
    America's #1 Nerdy Comedian
    What do you get when you cross an Engineer with a stand-up comedian? You get Don McMillan. This former chip designer has been doing his one-of-a-kind, PowerPoint-Driven comedy show for audiences for over 20 years. In his show packed with graphs & charts, Don will show you the funny side of your world that has been sitting right in front of you - you are just too busy working to notice. Don graduated from Stanford University with a Master’s Degree in Electrical Engineering. He then went to work at AT&T Bell Labs where he was part of the team that designed the world’s first 32-bit microprocessor. He then moved to Silicon Valley where he helped launch the start-up company, VLSI Technology. Then after 15 years in the tech world, Don quit his job to become a stand-up comedian. That year he won $100,000 as the Comedy Grand Champion on “Star Search”. Don’s been seen on “The Tonight Show”, “HBO”, and the “Comedy Central”. These days, Don spends most of his time writing and performing customized corporate comedy shows for companies like Google, Apple, Amazon, Microsoft, Ford Motors, and Exxon/Mobil. Don has performed more than 800 corporate shows in the last 20 years and he was named the #1 Corporate Comedian by the CBS Business Network.

ความคิดเห็น • 809

  • @Deathnotefan97
    @Deathnotefan97 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2741

    You know, given that most billionaires' net worth is tied up in property, stocks, etc. (ie, stuff that is worth money but not money itself) referring to it as "imaginary money" actually makes sense

    • @MarshallTheArtist
      @MarshallTheArtist 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +98

      All money is imaginary. It's all just faith.

    • @Deathnotefan97
      @Deathnotefan97 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +78

      @@MarshallTheArtist well, back when people used gold as money, it was real (if technically arbitrary)

    • @MarshallTheArtist
      @MarshallTheArtist 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +52

      @@Deathnotefan97 It was real in the same way that all social constructs are.

    • @SepticFuddy
      @SepticFuddy 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +46

      @@MarshallTheArtist Not exactly. It was a physical commodity, but the trade value of that commodity was indeed socially determined, as is the value of literally anything else. Fiat currency barely even has a physical form anymore and what little it ever did have was always predicated entirely on socially-arbitrated "value" to begin with.
      IOW the physical fiat note or alloy was minted merely to directly represent a "value" socially-constructed ex nihilo, whereas a minted precious metal or promissory note was created to guarantee a fixed quantity of said physical commodity whose "value" was market-driven.
      The fiat currency is created to grant vast manipulative powers to the central authority minting it, while commodity money is more intrinsically tied to market valuation and requires intermediary tricks to accomplish a generally lesser degree of such manipulation.

    • @MrBennieagray
      @MrBennieagray 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      If he was wealthy. He would release his tax, but his niece released part of it and that part showed he was broke. He said the other half shows he's wealthy, but won't release it.

  • @kabouterwesley83
    @kabouterwesley83 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3880

    If you know your exact net worth, it can't be much.

    • @dop01
      @dop01 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +137

      I just take whatever is in my pocket, subtract my credit cards, car loan and whatever it costs buy a bag of weed.

    • @Drekromancer
      @Drekromancer 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +32

      @@dop01 Unironically based outlook.

    • @dielaughing73
      @dielaughing73 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      I track mine in a spreadsheet. It's not exact, nor is it much. But I do have a number.

    • @spamuel98
      @spamuel98 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      1010.89

    • @rolandhansen812
      @rolandhansen812 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      @@dop01 But then the bag of weed would be an asset. At least until you smoke it. Then you just won't care any longer.

  • @edl5731
    @edl5731 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1562

    As a kid would call them the "fake numbers" or "Easter Bunny numbers" to annoy our math teacher. Our math teacher got back at us to annoy us she taught us complex numbers.

    • @1495978707
      @1495978707 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +49

      This is why I much prefer the original name for them, lateral numbers

    • @chiensyang
      @chiensyang 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +31

      One of my students asked me what does 60+100i mean as the score. I said 60 was "your real score" and 100 was "your imaginary score."

    • @duprod5482
      @duprod5482 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      ​@@chiensyangtoo bad they didn't respond with "wouldn't that make my actual score 116.62?"

    • @lagomoof
      @lagomoof 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      I like this Easter bunny numbers idea. Fibonacci had some interesting ideas about rabbits too, but that can get exhausting after a while

    • @itskarl7575
      @itskarl7575 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Complex numbers, you mean girl numbers?

  • @KiranasOfRizon
    @KiranasOfRizon 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +436

    As a computer scientist I heard him emphasize the word "complex" and knew immediately how the punchline would follow. Oof.

    • @Aetmero
      @Aetmero 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

      Ya I heard the setup and was cracking up before the punchline, it’s a good one.

    • @HotelPapa100
      @HotelPapa100 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Yep. I was kinda disappointed he didn't get a laugh right then and there.

    • @RonJohn63
      @RonJohn63 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@HotelPapa100 remember: "math class is tough".

    • @Metal_Sign-Friday_Patchouli
      @Metal_Sign-Friday_Patchouli 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I clicked hoping the joke would be made

    • @ahmataevo
      @ahmataevo 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      His net worth can be determined via quaternion functions in a normalized set of matrices.

  • @Douglaa846
    @Douglaa846 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1067

    Was really hoping his venn diagram would actually just stay as 2 seperate curcles

    • @dakzibbon6589
      @dakzibbon6589 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      It would at least create the number 8

    • @liamcullen3035
      @liamcullen3035 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      Lol yeah that's what I thought it was going to be

    • @Arai503
      @Arai503 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

      The third level to this joke is for people that understand that non-intersecting venn diagrams can exist.

    • @landonletterman831
      @landonletterman831 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      *circles

    • @samuelzackrisson8865
      @samuelzackrisson8865 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @@Arai503 that is not correct. that would be an euler diagram

  • @traviswilliams3034
    @traviswilliams3034 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +313

    How many people do you reckon completely wiffed on the fact that imaginary numbers are also referred to as complex numbers. I love this joke.

    • @phpART
      @phpART 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +32

      complex numbers are if you combine real and imaginary numbers. That allows you to discover new math 😜

    • @skipp3252
      @skipp3252 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

      complex numbers aren't imaginary numbers. Imaginary numbers make up the imaginary part of complex numbers. They are any experession involving the square root of a negative number, usually with i = sqrt(-1)

    • @thohangst
      @thohangst 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Heyo, present.

    • @thatskinnylandonkid
      @thatskinnylandonkid 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Honestly, I didn't get the joke.
      Thanks for explaining it to me.

    • @macvos
      @macvos 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      It works without that too, with Trump's imaginary wealth, imaginary intellect, imaginary business instincts and imaginary talks (the famous "I once said to ... and he/she said I was a genius for saying that").

  • @DM-kl4em
    @DM-kl4em 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +325

    I love it! For maximum impact, you can also substitute the letter "j" if you are doing stand up in Silicon Valley (or other similarly "tech heavy" area). In circuit analysis, "j" is used instead of "i" because "i" is used for electrical current.

    • @kdog2646
      @kdog2646 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And why the f*** we use j for existing impedances is not explained, but we do

    • @lillii9119
      @lillii9119 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      Also in programming j is used because i stands for index already

    • @jensphiliphohmann1876
      @jensphiliphohmann1876 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Physicist use j for the electric current density.

    • @victorscarpes
      @victorscarpes 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      ​@@jensphiliphohmann1876 usually it's uppercase J for current density and lowercase j for the imaginary unit

    • @MathematicsStudent
      @MathematicsStudent 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      Using "i" for the imaginary unit shows that you're one of the cool kids, like us mathematicians.

  • @NarffetWerlz
    @NarffetWerlz 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +40

    Eleventy-billion is still one of my favorite numbers.

    • @Skullhawk13
      @Skullhawk13 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Do you think eleventy is like 11 11s or 11 to the power of 11?

    • @NarffetWerlz
      @NarffetWerlz 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@Skullhawk13 Yes.

  • @baoboumusic
    @baoboumusic 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +147

    He missed an opportunity to put i in the Venn diagram overlap.

    • @andrewtorrens7790
      @andrewtorrens7790 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Or turn it into a Newton's basin as they got close together...

  • @Lightmagician60
    @Lightmagician60 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +198

    i dunno "Imaginary Net worth" sounds accurately amusing

    • @joeschneider3894
      @joeschneider3894 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Sure Jan

    • @steffenbendel6031
      @steffenbendel6031 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      But be careful when squaring it.

    • @spacetoast7783
      @spacetoast7783 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Imaginary net worth is part of a complex net worth.

    • @kwilliams2239
      @kwilliams2239 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@spacetoast7783 I imagine Trump's finances are pretty complex. Billionaires' net worth is, the nature of the beast. Tax avoidance isn't easy. If it were, legions of accountants and lawyers would be looking for jobs at Starbucks.

    • @Arai503
      @Arai503 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Philosophical thought of the day: All net worth is imaginary.

  • @Wilfoe
    @Wilfoe 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +75

    This got me to laugh. Imaginary numbers are fun. :)

    • @lindaward3156
      @lindaward3156 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      aren't all numbers imaginary? they don't exist outside of what we acknowledge them to be

    • @Wilfoe
      @Wilfoe 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@lindaward3156 Fair. Though there are specific types of numbers called "imaginary numbers". Not the best name, but that's how they are. I don't remember what they're used for though...

    • @davidcolin6519
      @davidcolin6519 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@lindaward3156 You are, to an extent, right. But that is not what is meant by "Imaginary (or complex) numbers".

    • @lindaward3156
      @lindaward3156 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@davidcolin6519 yes I/m aware, it was- an attempt of esoteric humor. I guess you didn't get it

    • @tabularasa0606
      @tabularasa0606 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@lindaward3156
      No they are abstract concepts.

  • @dapawta
    @dapawta 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +73

    Good to know I'm part of the 1% for once in my life 😂

    • @oakherder17
      @oakherder17 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      woohoo I’ll never be part of the other 1% so I will take this win

  • @nunyabitnezz2802
    @nunyabitnezz2802 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    I’d like to have that imaginary net worth. It helps you fly from your skyscraper to your other skyscrapers on your personal 747.

    • @karlhendrikse
      @karlhendrikse 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      On your personal 747i

  • @militarymann3643
    @militarymann3643 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +113

    The imaginary net worth basically means that the money is in stocks and/or real estate and/or some other valuable, all of which can fluctuate in “value” on who wants it.

    • @jofujino
      @jofujino 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      The other reason a lot of it is imaginary is because the claimed value was manipulated (usually inflated so he had more capital to back commercial real estate loans to get larger loans on better terms). There's also been a commercial real estate valuation collapse ever since the pandemic and work from home took off, which reduces his real valuations. Albeit, he's far from alone in not accepting the commercial real estate market is not what it used to be since many corporate real estate owners (and banks) are refusing to write down the properties since executives want to put off putting the massive losses they are taking on their balance sheets as long as possible (ideally for their successor to have to break it to shareholders).

    • @elpred0
      @elpred0 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      lol no

    • @stevenpace892
      @stevenpace892 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Trump has a huge court finding that he actively falsified the value of things; also have two sets of values, one for collateral, where higher is better, and taxes, where lower is better.

    • @NoRegertsHere
      @NoRegertsHere 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jofujinowriting down the value of capital can have a positive impact on numbers investors like (ROIC).
      And if you are talking about Florida Mar y lago, value for taxes is different to value for loans/market price.

    • @BryanTorok
      @BryanTorok 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      That actually is the case with any sort of investment. In fact, it is the case with everything, including cash. It is only worth what someone else will give you for it in the moment.

  • @eyefreely9682
    @eyefreely9682 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +101

    Imaginary or NOT... IRS wants their cut

    • @TarisSinclair
      @TarisSinclair 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Well they got about $500 last year, from what I know.

    • @Nathan-en9dn
      @Nathan-en9dn 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@TarisSinclair Blame the tax code... they allow people to write off "loses" as taxes paid. Most billionaires have "loses" that they are able to write off.

    • @douglasstrother6584
      @douglasstrother6584 หลายเดือนก่อน

      "Taxman" ~ The Beatles

    • @leozmaxwelljilliumz3360
      @leozmaxwelljilliumz3360 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Anyone who owns a business has write offs and rightly so. They take enough money through every conceivable tax imaginary, so it's pretty fair to be able to mitigate it or get some back.

    • @murray821
      @murray821 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Imaginary Revenue Service

  • @Akanoyoru
    @Akanoyoru 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +41

    He's right: most money is imaginary no matter who possesses it :D

    • @Jack-mb4jx
      @Jack-mb4jx 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Yep, it's all funny money

  • @sebione3576
    @sebione3576 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +40

    I'd rather have a president that leaves office with little net worth than one who gains tens or hundreds of millions of dollars while in office making $400k per year.

    • @wickederebus
      @wickederebus 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      I'd rather have a president like Argentina's Javier Milei.

    • @rodverap
      @rodverap 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      ​@@wickederebusviva la libertad carajo!

    • @spacetoast7783
      @spacetoast7783 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Damn, you're a big time Trump hater then.
      You're also in the bottom 99% because you don't understand middle school math.

    • @Dog_in_tree
      @Dog_in_tree 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@spacetoast7783 I'll pray for you

    • @rodgerhempfing2921
      @rodgerhempfing2921 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Always suspicious that.

  • @meferswift
    @meferswift 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +50

    Well, "imaginary " Number is real tho.
    Some languages called it tangential

    • @WG55
      @WG55 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      _i_ ∉ ℝ by definition. Did you mean to say that _i_ "exists"?

    • @meferswift
      @meferswift 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@WG55 yeah that.

    • @TheFeldhamster
      @TheFeldhamster 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@WG55there's an *extremely* good video series by Welch Labs called "Imaginary numbers are real".

    • @tabularasa0606
      @tabularasa0606 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Does it exist though, or is it just a mathematical trick to make some math easier.

    • @meferswift
      @meferswift หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@tabularasa0606 idk, but it is useful enough and it does help reallife case. so exist enough

  • @bliz85
    @bliz85 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +62

    It didn't land as well as the other joke using the same Venn diagram intersection format. A few possible reasons:
    - it could be construed as an attack on Trump and by extension, his supporters. (please no politically-charged replies; I'm just a joke explainer)
    - a lot of more people understand imaginary numbers than quantum theory (which iirc was the topic in the aforementioned previous joke)

    • @kdog2646
      @kdog2646 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Was that his Heisenberg uncertainty principle joke?

    • @markfergerson2145
      @markfergerson2145 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      The thing is, most wealth is imaginary these days. He didn’t dare mention that.
      (If I have to explain why wealth is imaginary, you haven’t seen videos of filthy rich people explaining how they buy million dollar properties with debt)

    • @frederickhettesheimer2698
      @frederickhettesheimer2698 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Or the "joke" just wasn't funny

    • @sadsongs7731
      @sadsongs7731 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's definitively a political joke. The thing is, as popular as Trump was, despite the entire establishment mocking him 24/7. The main reason Trump won was because people were tired of Obama's mismanagement/corruption. But they don't want you to remember Occupy Wall Street.
      Basically, making fun of Trump just reminds us about those billions of dollars given away for free to usurers for tanking the economy.

    • @jsquared1013
      @jsquared1013 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@markfergerson2145 everybody buys property with debt. What do you think a mortgage is?

  • @blue5659
    @blue5659 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

    Maybe networth, and stock price in general should be measured in C not R, because of wavey fluctuations

  • @CommandLineCowboy
    @CommandLineCowboy 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +47

    Aw Man.... Took me 5 seconds to get this joke & I've written Mandelbrot programs, ... shame (on me).

    • @danielm6247
      @danielm6247 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Shame on you . I still don’t know their purpose but I got the joke the moment I saw the cover picture

    • @stickyfox
      @stickyfox หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@danielm6247 it's because as a programmer, you have to use two real numbers to store one complex value. Programmers don't get to use their imagination.

  • @nerdygraves
    @nerdygraves 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +35

    TAKE MY LIKES YOU FUCKING GENIUS

  • @jonathanramsey
    @jonathanramsey 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +32

    I liked it. It’s up there with the guy who thought he was the differentiator joke

  • @whophd
    @whophd 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

    Douglas Adams was afraid to make jokes in Base 13, so this is brave.

  • @n3rfdr4gon99
    @n3rfdr4gon99 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Don McMillan is such an underrated comedian. I love how his mind works 😂

  • @Arken2249
    @Arken2249 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This Don (McMillan) is such a treasure!!

  • @tronjet66
    @tronjet66 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Never bored, idk why but I just like to watch people work, it's a very different life from mine (that and I am an engineer and like to gain what lessons I can from what other engineers have done, plus, I get some insight into repairability and the factors that affect that)

  • @raymondwall8187
    @raymondwall8187 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    this is the joke that made me say "I like this guy."
    Subscribed

  • @Left_hand_clapping
    @Left_hand_clapping หลายเดือนก่อน

    Don is comedy gold! Great delivery and timing.

  • @petermarshall7352
    @petermarshall7352 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I went to a dinner for mathematicians last night. The bill was real, but the food was imaginary.

  • @chaosopher23
    @chaosopher23 หลายเดือนก่อน

    From someone who knows electronics, I'm glad I had taken a gulp of beer some time before watching this.

  • @CodeKujo
    @CodeKujo หลายเดือนก่อน

    Well, that joke had ME rolling. one-percenters represent!

  • @coolnoob5508
    @coolnoob5508 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Damn the iota

  • @Stratelier
    @Stratelier 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I saw the punchline coming the moment he jumped on the word "complex".
    And was not disappointed.

  • @ramikazziha5910
    @ramikazziha5910 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You just added a new dimension to comedy, 😂

  • @blackchibisan8116
    @blackchibisan8116 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

    How was I not subbed to you before and why is today the day of all days you show up in my feed? I love your comedy and keep it up.

  • @philipschifflin8546
    @philipschifflin8546 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    As someone that understands imaginary numbers, I can attest that math is just not a funny subject

  • @lordneeko
    @lordneeko 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Jeff Bezos: anyone who puts PowerPoint in front of my face is fired
    This guy: Making PowerPoint fun again 😜

  • @allasar
    @allasar 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Never thought I would say this, but I am in the 1%. Look at me now, mom, are you proud?

  • @SkiRedMtn
    @SkiRedMtn 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Fantastic. I watched his whole special couple years back. Hilarious

  • @neonendo
    @neonendo หลายเดือนก่อน

    The Nerd we all wanted but never will get

  • @whitenekoknight6035
    @whitenekoknight6035 หลายเดือนก่อน

    He slipped a smooth "eat the rich" joke in there at the end.

  • @peepoCute
    @peepoCute 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Not only complicated, but also complex

  • @onichan9710
    @onichan9710 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'm happy to say, I understood that joke. I even predicted the punchline.

  • @Purgiful
    @Purgiful 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Laughed the moment I saw the i - thankyou university math.

  • @jprsfragoso
    @jprsfragoso 18 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Proud to be on the 1% for something.

  • @thefalselemon579
    @thefalselemon579 หลายเดือนก่อน

    These court cases about to sentence him to a single multiplication of i to turn that whole thing negative 😂

  • @Sera_AI
    @Sera_AI 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hey! I'm finally part of the 1%!

  • @TheNimaid
    @TheNimaid หลายเดือนก่อน

    Bro using math to express wealth as a 2D metric.

  • @philipberthiaume2314
    @philipberthiaume2314 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    Imaginary is the valuation of Truth Social which is completely and utterly out of touch with financial reality.

    • @thomgizziz
      @thomgizziz 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You don't get to decide that. Facebook loses money and should have negative value. You are so slow that you are claiming others are out of touch with financial reality when it is clear you are the one that is unintelligent.

    • @frontiervirtcharter
      @frontiervirtcharter 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Pravda (communist party of russia's newspaper) means 'truth' .. Kinda fits, too, he's got Soviet level truth-telling skills.

    • @helpumuch6887
      @helpumuch6887 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yet another example of crazy trump grift, stealing money from illiterate supporters

  • @emjizone
    @emjizone หลายเดือนก่อน

    It makes more people laugh outside the U.S.A. than inside it.

  • @Plasmabro
    @Plasmabro 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is great lmaoo

  • @michaelkrauer1286
    @michaelkrauer1286 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    That joke is in fact funny

  • @samchickensandwich23
    @samchickensandwich23 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Omg love this guy so much 😂

  • @BlazeMakesGames
    @BlazeMakesGames หลายเดือนก่อน

    Finally I’m part of the 1%

  • @robslife27
    @robslife27 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I fucking love it it's fucking hilarious 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

  • @MrJBA79
    @MrJBA79 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I use the tRump name to describe my morning movement as in, brb, I have to take a tRump.

  • @seblara839
    @seblara839 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Is harder to find people with sense of humor than math nerds

  • @amog8202
    @amog8202 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    I thought the joke was his net worth is sometimes negative

    • @Michael-uc2pn
      @Michael-uc2pn หลายเดือนก่อน

      Coming from a finance background I was confused when I read the original formula as having "negative $3.1 billion" before even getting to the "i".
      (A single number in Parenthesis usually indicates a negative in accounting)

  • @verdazair
    @verdazair 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Ok, that was hilarious, as far as I'm concerned!

  • @joebuckley2180
    @joebuckley2180 18 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Since the vast majority of wealth is in unrealized gains, yes, it is most accurately considered imaginary

  • @brian1204
    @brian1204 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Love the geek humor! Just my style! 😂

  • @AndyRome
    @AndyRome 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It wasn't funny, it was hilarious!

  • @Jake12220
    @Jake12220 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It's easy to put a number on net wealth if it's from listed shares, it's not so easy when it's real estate and private companies.

  • @johnozzmond9728
    @johnozzmond9728 หลายเดือนก่อน

    He glossed entirely over how he got the 3.1b, which is where the complexity lives. That number can probably vary by hundreds of millions depending on the day

  • @gianlucatartaro1335
    @gianlucatartaro1335 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Yes! I finally made it into the 1%!

  • @jacobellis1514
    @jacobellis1514 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    And if he squares his net worth it goes down

    • @karlhendrikse
      @karlhendrikse 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Nah it goes to the left

  • @bendystrawz2832
    @bendystrawz2832 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    LMAO A top tier complex number joke.

  • @MTXSHO9732vV8SHO
    @MTXSHO9732vV8SHO 6 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

    He's talking about calculating "imaginary numbers". It's a thing, for electronics "+" would be inductive and "-" would be capacitive

  • @Josh-99
    @Josh-99 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I laughed at the equation, making me a member of that 1% Venn diagram overlap -- a dubious honor at best!

    • @thomgizziz
      @thomgizziz 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You are a sad sad little man that is trying way too hard. Get help.

  • @ghostfaceknuts
    @ghostfaceknuts 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Now that I've researched, I agree, this is a textbook great joke.

  • @jensphiliphohmann1876
    @jensphiliphohmann1876 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I love maths jokes!

  • @sirakkeeghan1470
    @sirakkeeghan1470 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Finding a way to make a joke about imaginary numbers before you tell this joke would solve the problem of no one knowing what imaginary numbers are

  • @bookwyrm539
    @bookwyrm539 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    Alright, That was actually a very good joke.

  • @feezer3017
    @feezer3017 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I'm prety sure 'i' actually makes it complex. You sort of proved him right...

  • @amargasaurus5337
    @amargasaurus5337 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    if you know your average mathematician, you'd set that overlap to (1/1%)%

  • @yusaki8064
    @yusaki8064 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    For once, I am in the 1%

  • @Oct_sflb
    @Oct_sflb 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    It did, in fact, land

  • @Mikej1592
    @Mikej1592 หลายเดือนก่อน

    LOL yeay, im finally in the 1%

  • @wernerviehhauser94
    @wernerviehhauser94 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    That joke is great. It just doesn't work on a real audience :-)

    • @steyraug96
      @steyraug96 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Something you must understand when dealing the masses: the M is often silent... But they are not. 😜

    • @karlhendrikse
      @karlhendrikse 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I do most of my jokes for imaginary audiences and they work really well

  • @Billionaireben
    @Billionaireben หลายเดือนก่อน

    His net worth back then was more solid, a billion dollar skyscraper with 20% equity for using his name to get financing or one he owns with 65% financing and 35% equity; those 2 examples would be $550 million. Now, he owns 60% of a public company with a market cap of 6.14 billion (down from $9.8 billion.) He probably peaked at $10 billion in assets including money he invested into his children and debt that tenants would pay off over time prior to this business, maybe $3 billion net; so with this business maybe $7 billion now and 10 billion in net worth including building equity and stock shares owned. The downside is if you sell a building the value doesn't go down, if he started selling shares; the value may go down.

  • @mannamoth918
    @mannamoth918 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Yo, whys Vegeta the head of the Ruu Clan

  • @JenkinsStevenD
    @JenkinsStevenD หลายเดือนก่อน

    Imaginary numbers aren't actually imaginary. They are simple perpendicular. We use them in engineering. For example, if you go to any commercial building you will see a transformer outside and that transformer will be rated in kVA. That kVA rating is the sqrt ((real power rating in watts)^2+(reactive power rating in VAR)^2). Within this calculation the reactive power is "i" or as we call it...imaginary, but it is in fact something very real. You will also notice by the structure of the calculation that it is really just pythagorean theorem. Real power is on the x axis, reactive power is on the y axis and the kva rating is simply the magnitude of the hypotenuse. Imaginary numbers were never really imaginary to begin with. It is just a name. As you can see, I fall in the left circle of the Venn diagram.

  • @m9l0m6nmelkior7
    @m9l0m6nmelkior7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This one is really funny x')

  • @DeusKDuo
    @DeusKDuo หลายเดือนก่อน

    That sounds about right. on Paper i am a millionaire but i live paycheck to paycheck 100k a year before taxes. 4 mortgage payments. My day job makes 60k the 40k comes from the properties. I still havent made back what i put in to get and fix the properties. They did appreciate in value and i have paid down enough to make me a millionaire on paper. I am driving around in a used Mitsubishi mirage living paycheck to paycheck but this will eventually pay out in the long run.

  • @smartalek180
    @smartalek180 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'm a 1%er!
    Woo-hoo!

  • @courtney-rw8ch
    @courtney-rw8ch หลายเดือนก่อน

    3% of the audience got that joke. The others that clapped and laughed just didn't want to appear dumb. But 3% IS more than 1% they DID do better.

  • @exousia2002
    @exousia2002 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The crazy thing is that if you multiply that imaginary portion with another imaginary entity it becomes real.

    • @Michael-uc2pn
      @Michael-uc2pn หลายเดือนก่อน

      Trump furiously trying to find North Dakota so he can multiply his net worth

  • @christopherclayton5500
    @christopherclayton5500 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Heh. Saw it coming, still funny.

  • @myria2834
    @myria2834 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Net worth: How much money you would have if you sold everything of value, and paid all your debts.
    Nobody wealthy enough to measure their wealth in net worth is going to do that. It just tells the bank how much they can lend you with confidence that it will be repaid.

  • @Hard2heart2heart
    @Hard2heart2heart 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

    I think that people that understand imaginary numbers hate this joke even more because you obviously don't.

  • @bpivr
    @bpivr 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Or “j” for the EE’s

  • @ArtVanAuggie
    @ArtVanAuggie หลายเดือนก่อน

    1%, you were correct.

  • @doughboy_6439
    @doughboy_6439 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    By that reasoning, there are no billionaires at all.

  • @TheAnon26
    @TheAnon26 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Huh. Imaginary numbers arent hard. Hell, I tought myself about them due to skipping a class...

  • @AiOinc1
    @AiOinc1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

    Most people in positions of wealth make sure it is imaginary to evade taxation

    • @steyraug96
      @steyraug96 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hedge against inflation, actually. (Thing) Has inherent value, so currency changes mean very little; sell to get new currency value, no loss in value of (thing.)
      Silver, gold, gems, salt, fat, have all been forms of currency. Water, too, Google Water Empire, shown in Mad Max Fury Road, and Dune (water om Arrakis, Spice for the universe.)

  • @andrewstahl2274
    @andrewstahl2274 หลายเดือนก่อน

    God bless Microsoft Power Point!

  • @gendo1123
    @gendo1123 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Brilliant

  • @ashardalondragnipurake
    @ashardalondragnipurake 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    isnt all money imaginary since the gold standard was dropped
    or pretend money since imaginary might still be generous

    • @frontiervirtcharter
      @frontiervirtcharter 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The value of dollars is that you need them to pay taxes to or buy military equipment from the US

  • @petercoulthard804
    @petercoulthard804 หลายเดือนก่อน

    In that 1%. Good joke.