Radeon Vega Frontier Edition benchmarking & interview with AMD
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 ก.ย. 2024
- AMD's Radeon Vega Frontier Edition may be a graphics card made for science (specifically, workstations), but gamers are just as eager to see what it says about the consumer version coming soon. The company's already made a splash this year with its Ryzen and Ryzen Threadripper CPUs. To show how the Radeon Vega Frontier Edition could do the same for workstations, AMD officials gave us a hands-on preview of one of the first production cards.
Read the full article at PCWorld.com:
www.pcworld.com...
Follow PCWorld for all things PC!
--------------------------------
SUBSCRIBE: www.youtube.com...
FACEBOOK: / pcworld
TWITTER: / pcworld
WEBSITE: pcworld.com/video/
"This isn't targeted to ward gamers" You can't tell the PC Master Race what to do
Johnny Gat , you said what I think , totally agree
you are one of those who buy intel extreme edition cpus for gaming arent you?
Johnny Gat Finally someone that understands!!!
Johnny Gat. Why in the hell would I support AMD when their products at the time were inferior? That is like saying take the bus to support the terrible transit system that will take two hours longer instead of taking your car. Give me a break.
your taste in waifus is shit
Quite good video, awesome!
I missed the part about video editing and rendering speed.
20:00 for the gaming benchmarks
dont watch them this is a pro card and gaming benchmarks have no usecase at all and dont tell you much about the upcoming cards.
matthaus woolard but what about impatient people they could just go and buy it for gaming right away or try mining with it
buying this card for gaming is really pointless if you can't wait then its better to get 2 1080Ti but better still to wait.
For mining, this card most likly will not be worth the power draw, we need to see the benchmarks on this but i think it very possible that you will not get as good performance/w as with lower end cards. (or even better the instint cards that dont have any display overhead)
24:42 "No frame rate display" I wonder, why would AMD be afraid of a frame rate monitor?? Perhaps it has got something to do with the fact that there is an OUTSIDE party, who wants to show RX Vega capabilities- who WILL NOT just stare at the skybox and proclaim "Vega Frontier KILLS Titan X!" *Never forget RYZEN LAUNCH BS!*
19:45 I thought he said Niggas gonna tell you why... I'm like very mature... But I rewinded it and heard Nick is gonna tell you why.
when will gamers get a card too?
Hi AMD 😍 can you please manufacture alot of extra Vega Cards because the miners wont let us play 😢
That would be great 😍
MrSamadolfo Nvidia already launched their mining cards. $200 gets you GP106 6GB, and $350 for full GP104. So basically $200 for a 6GB 1060 that doesn't have any display ports, and $350 for a GTX 1080 without display ports. I hope some Chinese company finds a way to flash the cards and put display ports on them. $400 for a AIB 1080 would be nice. Or hopefully $400 cut vega is just as good
Interesting info, a 1080ti clone 😍
It's actually my understanding that the marketplace as a whole for HBM2 modules is kind of fucked, they apparently always have shit yields when they manufacture a new architecture. This is apparently why the Vega cards aren't out already, they apparently would've launched closer to the Nvidia 10-series line-up but they couldn't acquire the new memory modules (which is also the reason why we saw GDDR5x instead of HBM2 on the Nvidia cards). I wouldn't expect there to be an abundance of these Vega cards simply because of the lack of available memory manufacturers. We're not going to have a high volume of cards with HBM2 in the marketplace until 2018, likely not even until the second half of the year too. HBM2 and Nand Flash shortages are fucking up the market right now.
Also, the TDP on these new Vega cards is so damn high that I don't really think it'll be advantageous to use them for mining, the return on investment for mining wouldn't justify the cost of energy with the high power draw on the gpu's, ironically this would make the Nvidia cards better for mining which is funny because the reason people currently buy AMD gpu's for mining is because they're cheap and the TDP on the new cards is so high that it could offset the convenience of cost factor.
Damn miners will ruin this too smh
The memory architecture will definitely be very helpful in this regard
nope, too expensive. Unless the hashrate is 4xs what they get at lower than 4xs the cost of the cards they normally use. if so, then yeah, theyll fill one rig with 4 of these in VMs instead of 4 rigs with 16 gaming GPUs. Depends on the math. Then youll see a shortage of 1200w+ PSUs lmao
Dat look tho th-cam.com/video/D5GcpYA7_wY/w-d-xo.htmlm1s
The AMD guys have been really careful with everything they say during this interview..
If VEGA Frontier is a professional card, this comparison is like comparing a Quadro to GTX. We all know that gaming cards are not made to perform well in engineering applications (solidworks, catia, etc). Even with same price point quadro will perform better in engineering applications.
Because of this they cannot use SPECviewperf to compare these to cards.
They should have used a quadro with similar price to compare with the Vega Frontier. As a AMD fan I feel bit disappointed.
Rashiga Walallawita /facepalm, it's price vs performance. 1080TI @$1200 vs Radeon FE @$1200.
Radeon Pro Vega Cards(WX) will have special drivers 20:10 over Frontier Edition and they will be competitor to Quadros.
RX---> Geforce
Frontier---> Titan
Radeon Pro(20:10)---->Quadros
Instinct--->Tesla
What's funny is that this card gets beaten by a Quadro P4000 in the professional benchmarks, a card that costs 2/3rds the price and consumes 1/3rd the power and has 40% the TFlops
TheHalfGlassFullGuy That's what these guys don't understand comparing workstation cards with gaming cards in professional applications is like comparing apples to oranges!
Just so you know, there is no way that RX Vega is going to compete with Geforce, just doing a basic calculation can tell you that the Top of the Line RX Vega cannot even come close to a Titan Xp. Same goes with Instinct to Tesla, especially with the release of V100.
Jesus Christ, This Guy just don't get it does he ? the AMD guy told him multiple times that vega FE isn't for Gaming, Just wait for the damn Rx Vegas for gaming .
Everything is about gaming for Gordon it seems - if you've watched any other episode. Drove me nuts with the gaming questions in this "review" video.
Nvidia says that Titan Xp isnt for gaming... AMD is doing the same
But I thought AMD had 2 of these cards running Prey recently??? 🤔
MrSamadolfo it does gaming too very well, but RX Vega is even slightly faster in gaming and also is going to be alot cheaper
ok sounds good 😍
Q (th-cam.com/video/D5GcpYA7_wY/w-d-xo.htmlm6s): "Is this a good deal?" me: Hell yes this is a good deal; I've previously had to pay 3 times that to get similar performance!
Hardcore
This is terrible "benchmarking" video. Why can't you just show us some relevant benchmark scores ? Oh I know ... because this card most probably sucks.
Because it's pretty bad, some benches are already out and it's on par with GTX 1080, but ridiculously expensive.
Well, just check the benches that are already out. Vega OC'ed is doing +- same Firestrike GPU score as GTX 1080. And 1080 Ti is quite far from both of these. And it's extremely improbable that the RX version will have +50% boost in gaming to make it at least interesting. I would guess it will be maybe 10% or so, at best .
So basically Vega is 999$ card which is bit slower than 500$ GTX 1080. Therefore it doesn't make any sense to buy it for gaming. (I'm not into PRO work, so maybe it's a great value in that space ...)
Gonna be picking buzzwords out of my hair for a month.
yeah, they democratized buzzwords to the limit
so if you want to build a game buy this:) its in all in one design studio
This thing is very simple , blue for professional , yellow for server AI . Blue + Yello = Hybrid . For those small enterprise , who absolutely no enough money like alibaba or google but want to purchase workstation grade GPU . AMD got higher margin from them than gamers , and those big giant Cloud provider wont buy those small amount GPU anyway , so wont effect other market which MI25 aim at .
wow when you say it like that...it does make sense :)
+YUJUN CUI
Black and Red is for gaming?
And do they have more colors going?
Nisco Racing they didn't release anything about Rx Vega so I have no idea but it seems likely the red theme is right for gaming not sure about combo with black . but this time we will see aib partner coming out Vega with better cooler solution than reference for sure unlike fury cards .
+YUJUN CUI
Well they had the Black and Red theme going on the VEGA GPU at CES 2017.
Very high chance that the colors scheme will stay the same.
they should have a vbios level thing that makes radeon cards suck at mining so that the damn miners stop stealing them all.
300watt tdp, that stock cooler gonna melt
I doubt that. They use their best silicon for this card so their operating temperature will be lower. The gaming version is different story since they dont use their best silicon so how hot your card will be determined by the silicon lottery, unless they release XFR version which take all best silicon and sell it at premium price.
300watts is no problem for a good cooler. Fucking 1080ti uses 275w without the OC
847,628 views The wattage is higher because it has more "Peak compute" than 1080ti
That wraith max cooler is so nice I wish cooler master just sold them if they make them might as well sell them
challenge: Take a shot everytime he says visualization
Excuses...they needed to release a gaming card first because that's what everyone expects. Comparing an Xp card they should have known that NVIDIA has their own workstation spec cards as it should have been compared to at least the QUADRO GP100.
NOT even AMD's site mentions it's specifically for workstations. Clearly they fell short at the last minute and by some guy saying it's for workstations over and over and over throughout this video..."Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain."...lol...seriously look at the site:
products.amd.com/en-us/search/desktop-graphics
NVIDIA (Workstation Cards):
www.nvidia.com/object/quadro-desktop-gpus.html
Stop playing dirty pool AMD.
I can understand why you did this video, but it is much more difficult to understand why the AMD reps. have compared the AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition vs the Titan XP (Basically the best gaming GPU) if this is not the GPU it is being marketed against. Why is it not going against the NVIDIA Quadro P6000 the top workstation GPU. Why wasn't that question even asked?
I think the OpenCL test in Cinebench R15 is a bit of a miss when it comes to performance numbers, just ran my GTX 680 2GB SC from EVGA through it and it scored 102FPS, which is just 18 FPS under a Radeon VEGA, which... Doesn't sound right. lol
Screenshot btw, if anyone fails to believe me: i.imgur.com/4m4s2nE.png
Saying Radeon Vega Frontier Edition is not for gaming target consumers.
Is same as saying.
Gaming GPU's are not for mining purpose.
Let's be straight here, a GPU that performance very good in 3D graphics programs can be purposed for BOTH.
AKA: "Professional" is just a buzz word.
Too much talking. Show the benchmarks and then start talking.
Also, you can tell that Vega is powerful by what it did to that guys eyes. AMD EYEFINITY!!!
Ech, those scores are kinda not that great, totally makes sense why they wouldn't put it up against a actual workstation card even after talking about how driver optimisation is important at the end and not showing frame rates in the games was kinda telling too when the Titan Xp will get upwards of 100fps at 4K ultra and those are likely 60Hz panels :| It even seemed like Gordon could tell it was lower but felt uncomfortable saying as much instead cagily saying I dont think the _regular_ gamer could tell the difference lol.
Not really a confident showing IMO :(
if the fps were anything special they'd be leaked already.
i predict rx vega to be 3% faster than a regular 1080...which is kinda bad considering how long it's taking amd to release this thing.
Why not compare the Vega with Quadro cards? As he said, the Vega cards aren't to be used if you want to play, so why would you compare it with the Titan XP...?
Titan Xp - Gamers who want to create/for hobbies
RX Vega - Creators/Professionals who want to game.
Not trying to be rude but that dude knows he can use a 3DS with 3D on for a few months to straighten his eyes right?
Either way Vega is here!!!
that computer guy with dark blue shirt sounds like kronovi of rocket league.....😂
damn that VEGA card looks sexy as fuck
AMD stepped up their game obviously
Will this do 150 MH/s?
Well, then this card is neither for professional nor gamers.
how would the Vega Frontier Edition work for Ethereum Mining ?
Hi AMD 😍 can u plz send a card over to gamersnexus & linus, so we can get some better gaming benchmarks, thx! 😇
Do you see many quadro gaming benchmarks? Then why do you want a professional card to be benchmarked in games? They are not for gaming
@kombatres Shut up, nerd! I'm a professional gamer!
I need to know how good this overclocks and games or else it's useless trash and AMD are overhyped!
@kombatres, because it has the same gpu as rx vega, although the clocks and drivers are different, it is the gpu, that people have been waiting for for ages.
unlike nvidia, amd uses the same chip for gaming and professional for everything, that makes it interesting.
however amd won't let this happen, because they don't wanna see a poor performance for vega gaming.
JayJapanB r u serious? it's a workstation card. it won't do as well as an RX version of the same card at any of those
@jayjapanB
eh seeing it so tight to a gaming card is maybe a bit wrong?
if we get gaming benchmarks it should be a "around there will rx vega be" kinda thing.
also amd will almost always be overhyped :D
that is partially due to people being fed up by insane pricing from intel and nvidia and horrible anti consumer behavior, making people crave sth. less fucked up.
The AMD person said Sigraf the LAUNCH EVENT! :D
RX Vega will finally launch?!
Hope so..
SiGGRAPH ASIA PROBABLY!!!!
I don't want to be the tinfoil hat guy, buuuuut... They started both benches at the same time, and later on you can see how one on the left (titan xp) is sometimes a whole scene ahead of right (Vega). And then they stop the benchmark and show us the old results. Don't get me wrong i want Vega to be on top, but that seems fishy as fuck.
great video guys. I'm waiting on thread ripper to come out before deciding my new home build , but I'm definitely eye balling the heck out of that FE. I do Autocad with database architectural software add on that draws our case work and such. The software draws the cabinets and such in 3d models that can be used to generate g code and nests for CNC machining. We had an older i7 and older nvidia to start out with. I upgraded that to the newer 7700k and 1070 gtx, and man what bummer that has been. We do a lot of big hospitals and other large buildings and that intel system does great but when I get half way through a job and towards the end, and it's just a tooth and nail fight to keep up productivity.
It was nice to see you ask the same questions I have with these high end pro cards. It's very difficult for me to determine what is doing what as it relates to: is my cpu handling this and is getting bogged down or is it the video card? I put 64 gigs of system ram on the new build at work but it hasn't helped in the slightest. When I'm in 2d wire frame on a plan view and grab and try to rotate the model, it just bogs down hard core. I'm hoping it's a GPU thing and the VEGA will help in this instance. So it was nice seeings the variety cases of Omar showing off different aspects like open gl or straight rendering etc.
My other big bottle neck is when I go into layout mode in auto cad, and my current system again just comes to a crawl when in layouts. I hope this is a GPU issue too. I've for t he life of me haven't been able to find a straight answer from autodesk on this at all, but I hope vega will improve that aspect of my work too.
My big question and you guys came so close to answering it is this. I want to kick a lot of ass for 8 hours on this thing as I work. But when I'm done with work I want to kick ass on the same rig at gaming too. (as well as my aging self can do. I can't keep up with kids anymore) If I have a system with an FE card in it, can I put an RX in another pci slot? So I guess what I want to know is can I switch from one card to another without swapping cards based on whether or not I'm working or gaming. The other thing to is how compatible if at all can a FE and RX be for cross fire or what not. I wouldn't expect them too, but would be pleasantly surprised if they can run together and work together.
Probably the only bummer I have with this video is that I wish they did the bench marks against quadro instead of titan. =(
But I imagine that is coming soon. If this card can save me 30 minutes or more a day in work it's an easy buy for me. My only worries is that will autodesk support it? I do know they have some of the fire pro(older amd pro cards), so that is promising. It's scary though for sure throwing down some cash not knowing 100% if it's the right call or not.
Great videos guys keep up the great work!
I like! Keep it up!
Thanks Jen Hsun Huang for taking some of your time to come and present an AMD card XD
Inb4 "das da mudda racis".
but what about mining? :3
F off, scrub. You bought all the Polaris, leave something for us sometimes!
El Diablo but dam if rx vega is even under 800 miners will buy it I was reading forums with a shit ton of miners so I guess preordering might be the only way unless they preorder them all themselves
don't worry crypto currencies crashed and all these ppl invested into miners then bitcoin/ ethereum dropped 30%
STGxDante still profitable to mine eth
Mike Crapse it won't be profitable by the time this is released, or at least not profitable enough for most of them to justify the upgrade from polaris
can you ran claymore please in next video?lol!
a dollar for everytime i hear forefront, capability, use case, compute, leverage, perfomance, application, process etc id buy me a fucking Vega for the amount of repeated words.
yeah all the buzzwords used are enough to make you cross-eyed with rage
What's that mini case and where is it's PSU?
My R9 Fury non x at Cinebench 15 opengl benchmark = 165fps......unfortunately this video doesnt tell me anything about performance unless the titan xp and vega are considerably slower than my 2 year graphics card.
That is gaming OpenGL performance not pro-consumer performance,
how good is your R9 Rury at 16bit compute? What about streaming data on and off the card how does that compare?
matthaus woolard I don't understand
EXCLUSIVE!!!!!!!!!!!!!! - Microsoft
we need some mid range cards 😩
RX Vega please
RepsUp100 End of July for that..
should of tested mining
omg no fps displayed, you know what the means, dont even pretend
Red Flag 🤔
Radeon Pro Render for Blender when? :(
pro.radeon.com/en-us/calling-all-blender-experts-apply-to-test-the-radeon-prorender-plug-in-beta/
matthaus woolard closed beta, no linux now, no release date
no ethereum benchmark?
1700x and vega card is my next gaming pc i dont give a fuck!
what about your wallet?
Why would a pro card need dual bios?
In case the user fuck it up during the setup. This feature exist on RX 570 and its just stupid not to include it on $1100 Vega.
Because updating the Bios could brick it 🤗
Because why fucking not lol.... These days if something dosnt have a duel bios i dont really want to buy it..... And yes im that one guy who was updating bios when the power cut out....
Had to buy a new board... NEVER AGAIN lmao
Noom right but it's not a card you would be doing that too
Do you not have to update bios for pro cards? i thought espessiaclly at that price point it would be an almost must have feature incase the user manages to screw something up,
or a bad spot of luck like me
"We don't care about the gamers , this card is for professionals and creators" how about game streamers they don't make content ? They don't edit nothing? Why u compare it with a more game oriented card then ? Amd u always been stuck in your head you don't move with what consumers wants. That's why u lost the race against Intel and Nvidia. You refuse to make the best of what u can do
Can somebody tell me full name of that Dell's monitor? 04:03
Google it IIRC They only make 1
+Bajan Art
If you wrote the sentence like this.
"Can somebody tell me full name of that 8K Dell's monitor?"
Google would have gave you the result, good luck.
No one is gonna game with it. 90% of them is gonna mine with them. so just run claymore or something and call it the day
Can someone please tell me why the TitanXP ONLY scores 109.61fps in OpenGL alongside this Vega that scores 126.17fps at this point in the video 18:50 when my own GTX1080 in the exact same scenario in the exact same test, same build CINEBENCH R15 my score is 153.36fps ?? here is proof i.gyazo.com/9d7d3cb95c4671d7927670dbef53a5ab.jpg
I have a Vega 64 that I got for 350 dollars in October 2018 because the seller didn't know the difference between that and Vega 56. It was not a bad deal despite being somewhat used. I think Vega FE has very similar performance. Vega 64 is already capable of doing a lot of manufacturing design and professional stuff but is limited in popular 3d rendering applications and engines due to lack of support for OpenCL. The only thing Frontier has going for it is the double the RAM amount, the drivers aren't all that much better in applications like VRay 2018 that don't like OpenCL to begin with.
If you guys wanna see Epyc actually in action, here's a video clip I found showing EPYC 7601 cpus going up again a couple of Xeon chips in Cinbench-R15. - th-cam.com/video/e00IlKIKOCs/w-d-xo.html
It's a great preview and it gives us some idea of more amazing things to come from AMD.
AMD Epyc and Threadripper are going to be an awesome alternative to Intel.
It's technically not for gaming, but if it's got the same GPU architecture then the performance will be comparable to the RX Vega.
It's the same thing with the Quadro P6000 which uses GP102, and actually performs slightly better than the old Titan X which is also GP102. So their Cinebench test is actually a very good representation of what the performance of RX Vega is going to be, and might even be lower than reality due to the cooling solution.
I used to think Vega wasn't going to compete with the XPp and Ti, but that Cinebench run, even if it's a synthetic, has got me thinking otherwise.
ahhh when pc master race gamers try explain what is awesome in new card....standard people don't know what to do and say...funny. But more funny is when professional try explain what is cool in new workstation card....9:22 "yeah keep going...emm yes yes." Ahh i love reaction when "i have best card on the market!!!111" hear about quadro or AMD workstation cards that are beast (now we can say was lucky for us)
So in terms of product placement, this card is a direct replacement to the Pro Duo, right?
In that regard, the Vega is actually a solid deal I think. It is a single GPU, so no fiddeling around with multi-gpu stuff.
Less power consumption and higher performance.
I still think that the market shifted a lot since then and in todays market Vega FE looks kinda odd, to be honest.
Or I dont understand the placement and what is being needed in these segments.
Going from some reviews, Vega FE is a hit and miss, with TitanXP beating Vega overall, while consuming less power.
I cannot wrap my head around this thing...
you can SLI two 1080Ti for gaming for the price of this card, who in their right mind would want this for gaming if It's not going to perform better than a 1080. They specifically position this card as "professional" so they can charge a premium. Gamers would be highly disappointed with it's price/performance ratio which would create bad rep, that's why they repeatedly said - not for gaming!
He kept talking about music, why? I don't want to listen to AlGorRythms. Who cares about AlGorRythms? Oh... algorithms. Oh nevermind, carry on men.
The real question how well does it mine ethereum?
Cooper_TheGeekery hope it dosen't
Panda Boy, Amen.
How is the future of ethereum? I can't predict this 30 days in advance. Therefore it's not different from horse betting
all peoples has the gtx 1080ti or 1080 start selling it cuse Vega Rx is gonna destroy them all just b ready to buy it by the end of July save money i already have the money i hope the Vegas RX cost $699 @12gb or $799 @16gb that's the price I'm expecting
Tbh the marketing plan is trash from AMD. Why target the professional market first? With all the teasing "Pick Red...yadayada" and then they postpone the RX versions to dick around with a WS class card. Because Nvidia has this release plan AMD has to follow?
can this be done with still some convenience with other GPUs? I have access to computers with Quadro M4000's or a GTX 970, as well as a Oculus rift. I also have Solidworks. is this doable, or do I need vega only software?
Amazon has a 30 day return policy, so I'm just going to keep using/returning the frontier edition until RX Vega comes!!!!!!
Just kidding I don't have £1,200
The benchmark for Viewperf shown was for an earlier run. The run that was happening in real time during the video seems to show the Vega FE card (RH screen) lagging behind the Titan card (LH screen), and it is stopped before the earlier benchmark is shown, or am I seeing this wrong?
In the rendering the left screen kind of leaped ahead of the right screen? Looking forward to see what NVidia can do with the gddr6 (make use of the high bandwith), hbm2 just seems to be a gimmick because gddr5 seems to be able to hold its own against hbm and hbm2
Jesus... You meet up with two highend professional company guys and you show up in that shirt....
If it was me I would've cancelled the interview...
Careful man, there's a *gamer* here!
"This isn't targeted to ward gamers" You can't tell were PC Master Race looks at!
18:30 Funny reaction. He's like "give the correct answer".
109fps in Cinebench R15 for Titan Xp? How much did they underclock it? My 1080Ti scores 186fps in that test. Fuck ATI.
Asian dude with glasses:Wait can you tell us what color rx vega is going to be🙏🏼? Amd guy:I can't tell you that. Asian dude with glasses:Ahhhh
I bought one, man how disappointing. Takes so much power it reboots my Dell Precision T7810 benchmarking with a 1300watt psu.
lol it's not clear at all what this card is for if you're an amateur pc builder. 1000$ for what exactly? They talked over and over and said nothing. What a major fail apologist video
Using DOOM and Sniper Elite to test AMD versus Nvidia is ridiculous considering both of them give AMD at least a 15-20% advantage
Not to sound negative but how did that score 109 when my 1080 scores 123.73 with a 1700X@3.8 something here is odd. imgur.com/8PjBGhT
Not impressed. I'll stick with my nvidia Autodesk certified cards thanks. At least they know how to make drivers correctly without taking years to figure it out. I don't got years to wait for their shit to work when I got clients.
WHY IS IT BLUE??????????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Hope they come out with a black and red version.
I admit i don't understand how these cards work. But if that AMD card is running faster. Car spinning faster. Then why do the renders finish at the same time? Or before for the Titan? What am i not understanding
Laughing my ass off on the Cinebench R15 test: 1080Ti runs OpenGL test 131.28 FPS
Vega fe for cad
xp(p) for Cuda video rendering
is what I'm getting from this. for non fire/quad budgets anyways.
If Vega FE is not for gamers they better have something for Nvidia's 1080 Ti because their recent offerings obvious can't do it.
No world would like to see what just saw. God, 30% more for same price. That power consumption a little bit worry me, but life is life.
about that target audience thing just make the gaming card faster for games and we will get used to that being a thing however atm we are used to a nvidia titan card being launched along with a much slower xx80 card making the titan a highend gaming card no matter if they like to say deep learning alot or not
i got so tired of waiting for vega so just bought a 1080 ftw2. went from 75 fps @ max settings 1440p on titanfall 2 to 144fps
What is the rig you are using with the vega? Im starting a trucking business and need a CAD capable computer for renderings.
If it gives more fps I would buy it for gaming (Y) 16gb hbm be great to lul at those nvidia peasants while making gaems feel good.
if it beats 1080ti and is cheaper than AMD just defeated both of it's opponents in one year, ofc the gaming vega not FE Vega.
heck they always test it in amd utilized games or what so ever ..
test it in nvidia utilized stuffs and if it goes over nvidias score then ill give them 4 thumbs up :D
can this support 5 monitor? do I need to use any adaptor? I saw 4 slots. 3 display port and 1 hmdi. can I use them all together and I get 4 monitors?
Damnit man my build time is approaching, so many goodies to choose from...FUCK!!!
0:50 "To keep you interested, and in this video, we are going to do a game demo at the end" ::Skips to end instead of leaving video:: Well played....