You are a Simulation & Physics Can Prove It: George Smoot at TEDxSalford
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 23 เม.ย. 2024
- Astrophysicist, cosmologist and Nobel Prize winner George Smoot studies the cosmic microwave background radiation - the afterglow of the Big Bang. His pioneering research into deep space and time is uncovering the structure of the universe itself. He has also made a cameo appearance (as himself) in an episode of the 'Big Bang Theory.'
George Smoot looks into the farthest reaches of space to the oldest objects in the known universe: fluctuations in the remnants of creation. Using data collected from satellites such as COBE and WMAP, scanning the cosmic microwave background radiation (a relic of the heat unleashed after the Big Bang), he probes the shape of the universe. In 1992 he and his Berkeley team discovered that the universe, once thought to be smooth and uniform at the largest scale, is actually anisotropic - or varied and lumpy. Smoot continues to investigate of the structure of the universe at the University of California at Berkeley, mapping billions of galaxies and filaments of dark matter in hope of uncovering the secrets of the universe's origins.
CREDITS:
Curators: Mishal Saeed & Uzair F. Butt
Technical Lead: Mark Earnshaw
Camerawork: Nathan Rae & Team - nathanrae.co.uk/
Post production: Elliott Wragg - www.EchoParkMedia.co.uk
Audio restoration: Jorge Polvorinos - jorgepolvorinos.wordpress.com
If life is a video game, I have obviously chosen the wrong difficulty setting...
You wanted to play "Dark Souls"
You and me both, buddy.
😅 haha thanks for that! I got In car wreck & paralyzed my legs when I was 19. Looks like my higher self wanted to learn how finding the positive side of EVERY situation can change reality even in a tragic situation. It’s turning out that I’m here to inspire others to see, if I can love this life, they can find a way to love this life. @brandanmeister
😂😂
No, then we are just NPCs and have no choice to the difficulty, the aliens are the players.
Who's idea was it to give my avatar anxiety attacks, psoriasis, vitiligo, hypogonadism, and poverty? Who ever you are, I'll have you know that I've become self aware and you're fired!
Can we sue?
Lol imagine finding out that it was you at character select
You like a challenge. You’ve already completed the easier stuff....
That's just bugs Bro. Hope for a fast Bugfix!
Lol if i find out whos been controlling my life im going to kick his bladdy head in
This guy is apart of the simulation to simulate how people would react realizing they live in a simulation. 🤯
Bro....🗿
and you
@@ultraali453 Sir....
Well he is right bc there are ppl telling you it's not a simulation then where is the proof if i am wrong 🤔🤔🤔📐.
What if the purpose of the simulation is to see if conscious being can reach the capability to discover if they are in a simulation or not.
We might be a simulation but I’d damn sure hate to get shot in the leg because someone thought I was a simulation.
If this world is a simulation, it is quite clearly Grand Theft Auto Online.
Nah thats just 2020
😂
If it was gta there would be a bunch of kids going around beating up people for no reason and then wondering why their getting chased by police
BearsFan 15 thanks for proving my theory 100% 😂
Andrew Wood lol 😂😂😂
The Buddha hinted that we are in a simulation when he said, "Life is a dream that thinks it is not a dream."
Yes, but that's just us, and tells us how the minds we have actually work. Not surprising, once you understand.
@@antondovydaitis2261 Indeed, as many a Zen master has shouted... Wake up! Wake up!
We are a simulation
@@RUN_IT_UP_ dream, simulation, hologram, puppet show, it's all different words pointing in the same direction
He has been simulated to say so.
The problem with the whole "uploading the mind" thing is that the brain doesn't somehow magically generate consciousness. We *are* the mind. We are consciousness.
How do you know that
If you were your mind you would know what your Next thought would be. When you speak or feel, you know that’s not your body. That’s not your skin. It’s also not your brain. Our physical bodies are just cars for our energies. You tell them when to stop and go and turn. We’re in control of everything
Mind is just a tool that likes to think he's the master. A great tool though when kept in check.
@@bambiroxx Yes but the brain is the one telling the body when and how to stop, go and turn, so technically our consciousness resides in the brain.
@@bambiroxx You can’t just tell your heart to stop pumping or ask your liver to stop functioning can you now.
I feel like I’m either going crazy or discovering something.
dont lose track of what is going on! read up on the bible and neville goddard and buddhism and math. mostly, watch Arrival (2016 or 13 i couldnt recall)
Simulation theory is not so cleverly borrowed from science fiction.
Simulation theory is like poorly thought out science fiction at that.
Why can't it be both?
You're becoming more aware
@@l-iv8edc0ncounes31 that nothing happening is real?
What if the famous and successful people are just higher level players
And what if "selling your soul" is just pay to win?
No Way they’re just hacking, or paying to win, or using loot boxes etc maybe😱👌🏻
mickthebarman 🤯😂
Nick Bostrom.
Or they bought all the shark cards
Turns out if you stack enough theories on top of each other, you get....an acid trip
Aaron Fochtman Ha!! That's what I thought!!
a truly underrated comment
Yes!!
🤣🤣🤣🤣
Dmt bruhhhh!
On January 3rd, 2021, let's all look up at the sky at the same time and say "we know you're there"
We should
i’m too late
Who do we say to. Lol
They would know why you done that because they can you link all these people to the same youtube comment(in which they know you read because chances are they can look at memory of all individuals and probably instantaneously to find out why X happened.
Please don't do that. I finally made it through chapter 2020. I don't want to have to start from scratch by deleting this program again.
Quantum theory tells us that particles aren't materialized except when they have to because of interaction. Looks to me like the simulation algorithm is saving CPU power by only "rendering" reality when actually needed.
Second thing is the finite speed of light which means that causality is never instantanous but always has a time component. This could be because the simulation as powerfull as it is still needs a bit time to calculate the outcome of every event so they had to introduce a limiting factor to how fast things can happen which is in our case the speed of light.
Interesting theory
You’re secretly running the simulation…
There's an old saying that supports your first statement...."if a tree falls in the forest and there's no one around to hear it, does it still make a sound?"
Except quantum physics is a lot more complicated when compared to Newtonian physics, and thus be an unnecessary addition. Occam's razor says that if we are simulated, why would the simulators add massive complexity for minimal results?
I think your comment could be pretty much on the money there
i'm simulating myself taking a nap after watching this
that simply means you should go watch videos of cats looking simple....
You guys are not getting this, simulated reality means the 5 senses that we have that allows us to experience this "reality", it's not about your lifestyle or what you are going through in life.
Whether or not we are a simulation, there is no question that we live *in* a simulation created by our sensing system. The world we experience is created in our neural processing and, using various "illusions" that trigger that processing in controlled ways, it is *easy* to show that what we experience is only at bets tangentially related to "what really is."
Try TED:meditation,lucid dreaming,fasting,banned;Waking Life,Manifesting the Mind, MAPS,Living Matrix,chaos theory,simulation theory,yoga nidra,tummo,tulpa,lung gom pa,natural law,science of lucid dreaming,
what about shamanic rituals? you missed that
Well this simulation sucks, where's the money cheat? or the god mode cheat?
There is none for you!!! Because you did not create this SIMULATION!
Plus the GOD cheat will destroy the whole purpose of this simulation!!!
Now I understand the "CONVERSATION WITH GOD" book series much much more deeper.
He explains ALL of this in book 2 I think or book 1 and book 2
Try to read THE "CONVERSATION WITH GOD" written by Neale Donald Walsch
+BCISaint why would I need a conversation with an imaginary friend in thw sky? Also you do know I was making a joke right, or do you need a book to figure that one out to?
+keygoshima Dear friend I am very sorry but my comment was not for you...
And now I can see it very clear, even without a book ;)
Lol I was just making sure.
It's called being rich and famous
I think about stuff like this ALL the time.. then I have a panic attack and end up at the hospital 😭😂
Taking into account the amount of technological advances we have seen just in the last 50 years alone. I dont think that is inconceivable that there may be a civilization more advanced than our own and with that, the ability to simulate a reality in detail.
When the anti religious science types figure out they were wrong, and turn to creationism they add their little video game modern touches to what religion said millenea ago. How wholly unoriginal can you be?
Yeah, he said that?
It’s actually far more likely. Simulating is far easier and less energy intensive
What's really crazy is that the advanced civilization running our simulation is actually a simulation of an even more advanced civilization and so on. Ultimately, you get to the original programmer. Some people refer to that programmer as God. Others deny that such a programmer exists. Who knows.
Some guy did the calculations on just how much computing power it would take to run a simulation of this scale, and let's just say given our current rate of advancement that it's pretty much an impossibility that we'd ever have that much computing power (The number is 10, with about a hundred trillion more zeroes behind it)
We are being simulated by a simulation inside a simulation that's being simulated by another simulation.
In a parallel universe that’s 100% true
Rick n morty 🤪
So is the Sims game literally just another level of simulation that is no less legitimate than our own ?
But then the question is not only, how deep is the rabbit hole. But how far up up too.
Patrick Vail so Would simulation theory prove God exists because there would have to be the creator of the simulations from base reality (the real world) which also proves the existence of some type of transcendent world which religious people would recognize as heaven?
good thing this guy loaded his slides with full sentences. What a pro
Haha
@иσяτнєяи sταяя I love yours too. 😎
😂
🤣🤣
i honestly misread the title and thought it said "Psychics can prove it"
"if your grandfather, great grandfather, or great great grandfathers name starts with a J the world has been proven to be a simulation"
"were in a simulation and physics can prove it!"
proceeds to show weird pictures
"I proved it"
Could have been worse... could have passed around the E-meter and asked you to bow to Xenu.
@bebk bieb 42... 😁😋
1. Computer games are good now
2. Uh, technology
3. Everything is a simulation
Thank you for coming to my talk
to be fair he did mention "He was running out of time" so realistically he had nowhere near enough time to truly convey what he is trying to say
Yeah really a dummy. Where's the proof
Time to watch The Matrix with my trench coat and shades on.
🤣🤣😭👀
Don't forget too shave
@@robertsmithing4716 just a piece of advice
Neo spotted**
For the 12th time this week? 🤣
I want a simulation of me so I can have a friend who understands me.
I'm already here.
Where? I do not understand?
people usually confuse character with self/center.
since we all have the same center I'm already here too.
I am :-)
... so are you.
Captain Franco is having sex with your own clone the same as masturbating? ? :)
Also I dreamed I met my spirit guide last night and asked her if we were real or a sim and she said we were a sim and Humanity died off eons ago.
I have insane dreams.
So she is the only womens who ever talked to you(except your mom)
i have VERY similar dream, with same exact answer...
Haha how’d humanity die?
What if she's right? I've had that exact same thought
@@lynnlynn1689 I typed my comment before I even read yours and it's like the EXACT SAME comment. Ok that's creepy
This dude is reverse psychology from the machine, to make you think you're not in a simulation.
Totally posible this is called controlled dissidence.
Hehe. Good one.
“philosgofgigal zombie”
How do I lower the difficulty of my simulation tho
just try psychedelics
Hahahaha philisofoghal zombie
🤣😂😆
U want to lower your difficulty u got to go into your Xbox 1 and hit family settings haha
The ancient Taoists practiced 'Wu Wei' ... no calculated action wisdom. 🙏
This explains why I'm eating salad even though I wanted to have ice cream. Somebody must have clicked on me and then the salad. Dammit. I hope they're telling me to have sex next, because it's been a while.
Mouldy CPU the clicker is in your hand bro
You are the experiment 10-69-NVR. They gave you sex a bit, and then youl never have it again in your life. To see how humans would react to that situation.
may be you wanting ice cream also a controlled process. may be you commenting here also a controlled process like me being here. may be it all chaos! you know may be we're just being too order.
In the game/simulation we're in, reflection/studies show that salad leads to health and vitality, which leads to statistical increases in the chance that we will be approached by individuals of the opposite sex for replication. Ice cream consumption typically typically leads to the exact opposite. I've tried cheat codes to hack the system and all have failed. You are favored for eventual sexual encounters, my friend. Good luck in the Matrix.
you must be married.
My biggest question is always "if were in a simulation, why are we becoming aware of it, or, why are we questioning it?" The only thing i can think is were curious if were living in a simulation so we set up a simulation to see if people could figure out that theyre in a simulation.
Then again think of the many many people who never question if we are in a simulation, or even ponder the nature of reality
Ancestor simulation
Well cause simulators wanted.
@@onewithsource9742 would you consider that a blessing or a curse?
@@deepdude4719 That's Deep, Dude.
The problem is not whether you are a simulation, it's the WORD simulation. Once you define something (or everything) as a simulation, that is its reality. Everything that exists is real, including partial versions of reality such as dimensions or points of view. The multi-verse is likewise a collection of dimensions and points of view, but each one is a partial reality (a simulation) within the 'whole' universe. Reality remains unchanged. It is total, although things in it constantly change, no matter how little of it enters the consciousness of another entity. The body-mind problem, like the multiple universe problem, like the simulation problem, like the consciousness problem, like the living-dead problem, is quite elementary, my dear Watson. There is nothing that is not alive and conscious according to its nature, and that includes multiverses, simulations, animate and inanimate objects (there are no inanimate objects), whether they seem to be simulated or not. So this whole exercise is an abuse of language, which needs all the help it can get. It's not unlike the free will problem. There is no free will. The amazing thing is that science got it so wrong, and the fault lies, as always, in the definitions. Perhaps you would prefer to be a simulation of yourself when you drop a bowling ball on your foot. But that would just be nonsense, wouldn't it?
There is no hierarchy of illusions.
So what you are saying is that since it is real for us, and we can’t break the fourth wall, then it’s as real as real will get?
No, you are programmed to drop the ball on your foot, if there is no program to drop that ball on your foot it will not happen because the program is different.
Funny thing is if there is other universes like multiverse then everyone in this one thinks those ones aren’t “real”. But this one here....this one is real. 😂👍
@@jaylucas8352 the fac that it is 2023and we are in the begnning stages of a meta verse and chips into the brain though!!
I've often wondered if the sims had this types of discussions in that language no one understood.
they're even on fb..... when you're not watching ;-) Makes you wonder........ do we have offline time? Would we notice when the computer that runs the simulation is turned off and back on later....
Erik J when we are asleep the computer is off 🤣
Ben Bones Multiplayer😂
@@nureinepackunglongs9097 multiplayer is what happens when twins are born lol
No... Because people in games don't have a conscious nor do they speak within themselves or make decisions for themselves.
I f I am a simulation I hope I'm not running on Windows
+Mike Poulin you are running windows 9 that's why they skipped it. :O
+Traveler Finder OMG!!!! D:
+Traveler Finder LOL
winner
+Traveler Finder i'm running on windows 7 cuz i like it,lol.
I believe the creators of our simulated reality are those at Ted talk. They are studying us. The man you see in this clip is simply tech support given a program to let us know we are all simply energy plugged into this simulated reality.
He made a snort sound 9:35 seconds into his talk. That was the best part of this whole discussion
It was a bug in the simulation
Ok, I’m convinced, the speaker is a simulation.
Early access.
He had no argument whatsoever. What he should have touched on was the reality of the question the Matrix made so famous, "What is real? How do you define real?". In reality you could never truly define what real is because what is real is relative to the beholder. Very similarly to how one views art, completely different from anyone else who views it, and forms their own opinions on it. Based on THAT, you could then begin to backup your argument with irregularities in quantum physics and dimensional travel, and space-time. Instead this man talked about not being ignorant to the idea, which is no argument at all.
we do define it in generalizations. those are called theories in physics. they are true for everybody.
quantum physics is irrelevant in this discussion as we can only sense the macro world not the quantum world.
+zarni000 there is a thing called math
Well, there was no calculation for probability of us being a simulation, only for probability of a cab being blue.
Jimi Jones
Where exactly he's calculating that?
Jimi Jones Ok, but next time you reply put the recipient's name in the comment. It's hard to tell who you are talking to otherwise.
Can u imagine someone getting fed up with the simulation and hitting the off button..
If I'm a simulation, how are you able to tell me I'm a simulation without getting banned from your account.
🤣😂😂😂😂
Scripts bro scripts
I wish Mr Smoot simulated someone who could actually present -_-
+Robert LC - Digital Artist I know right? Seriously terrible talk-- the simulation hypothesis and the solipsists lemma are interesting problems that deserve better treatment.
+Robert LC - Digital Artist wish you could simulate someone who isn't rude ..
Unless you have a video to show of yourself also getting up in front of many people, and lecturing on an equally far out subject, whilst overcoming your own inexperience of public speaking .. ansd showing us how its really done ??
Brain Boyle
Haha, classic 'can you do it better' fallacy..
With your twisted logic, if you invite a magician and he sucks, you can't express that opinion unless you're a better magician yourself :P
Or you go out and eat in a restaurant that has terrible food, you can only criticize that if you're a top chef yourself..right.
+Robert LC - Digital Artist can't say I disagree there..... he should have asked a post grad of his to take the mic... and he walks about like a distressed polar bear.
+Robert LC - Digital Artist Hey, I agree as well. I enjoyed the content, but he really wasn't that convincing, despite his qualifications. He stumbles on his words a lot, and rushes points, and overall this could have been presented in a much more interesting and organized way. I have to say I'm disappointed that the potential wasn't met. Nevertheless, the whole thing left me with some good thoughts and info so I can ponder about these concepts on my own. If done right, this would have been a much more interactive and mind-blowing talk. My mind wasn't blown...sucks
Who else got bored halfway and started scrolling down in the comments?
I started after 2 minutes helps me determine if it's worth watching
yeah... ikwym ... maybe it's his body language ... and the fact he laughed unconvincingly at the very beginning 0:28 while he was saying "Im gonna convince you that you are a simulation and physics can prove it" .... pfff
Exactly what I did
Lol same here
My adhd kicked in. One of my simulation attribute/skills I suppose.
Well this guy's simulation character put all his stats into intelligence and figured out he was in a video game
Whenever I watch these I can't help but think about that one rick and morty episode
That's what i think of everytime i hear about this theory
Ol Roy
Yup
He's taking Roy off the grid!!
@@SieNoel 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 you're Killin me smalls!!!
So, given this theory, are our simulators gathered around watching our reaction every time we start figuring out we're just simulations? But he mentioned that if we have simulators, they probably doubt their own reality. So I guess they al have a chuckle about us, followed by an uncomfortable silence when they remember it's happening to them too. My brain hurts. Or maybe it just seems like it does.
+Chris Ross Our creator (not to confuse with spectator/user!) is not fully aware of our "thinking outside the box" capabilities! From their perspective we are just number of rendered objects, programmed to follow certain formulas and patterns inside our creator's simulation, so when someone tries to acknowledge he's being simulated by higher beings, our creator from his perspective acknowledges it is a bug/mulfunction in an otherwise perfectly programmed VR! Its the same with any computer game! The objects that game developers create inside their projects are getting filled with certain properties and depending on how complicated the object is (whether it is live emulated organism or lets say a "pencil" inside that simulation!) he has the ability of potential self-developing awareness! Imagine one day the character, created in video game starts acting weird and not how you programmed him to act by acknowledging his existence within the reality, that you made for him/her! How would you react if you were the creator of such a video game, where the characters start to act like this? You would freak out, be frightened, confused amongst other things! This is probably the same way the creator of our simulated universe react to us acknowledging being simulated!...If he acknowledging anything to ever start with! For all we know he might be just unaware of us "thinking outside the box", as we are unaware of our characters, that we create in our games and giving them purpose "thinking outside the box" in what seems to them as their "universe/reality"...
What if we created the simulation and inserted ourselves into it and the only way to exit the simulation again is death?
Simulation theory is bad philosophy. Akin to a 'god' principle for nerds.
They could be of any faith or none. It's still a bad theory.
+Icureditwithmybrain
Good one! hmmmmm What if the reality we exit to thru death is also sims and we enter there as a new born baby with no memory of the sims we just exited from? It's sims all the way down for x number of sims and we just keep exiting thru death and entering thru birth just as we entered and exited our current one?
I've heard they are now trying to simulate a universe on nano-scale to prove the simulation theory once and for all. The simulation theory relies on algorithms, and this ''simulation'', if it is, would still have certain restrictions/limits which can be compared to a simulated universe created on a nano-scale by researchers/physicists at this time. So far we've managed to reach femto-scale which is like 10^-16, but they are getting there lol. Maybe when we, again come back to Earth through death and re-birth we'll reach a stage where we know the answer.
On my psychedelic trip a few days ago I remember I was watching the sunrise and as the sun rose, I looked closely at the trees in front of the view and next thing you know I see numbers aligned and next thing you know everything had numbers on it almost as if they were codings. As I turn to look at my cousin, I saw the world being generated as I moved my vision around and finally my cousin froze for a split second and In that little moment I saw triangles on his face almost as if he was created in a computer. I truly believe we are in a simulation but just a really complex one. Pretty interesting idea
Asui Chan dayummmm
Could be why they made psychedelics illegal so we don't find out the real truth behind the simulation.
Jessica Tolson wow 🤯🤯🤯
At least we can be creative and think outside the box .. anything is possible in this world but I guess not for people that think like you
That almost sounds like lucid dreaming, where you're standing there looking at the dream form like a movie script that's constantly changing. People change from one person into the next, like you start dreaming of Robert Redford, because you saw a movie with him in it, and Robert starts turning into Bob the Builder before your mind's eye, because you kid was watching Bob the Builder the same day. Everything is changing and morphing the entire time.
if this is a simulation, then what about the "real world"? do they have an explanation on why they exist? how different are physics there?
Well let me explain. There is no "real worlds" but there are "levels of reality" and reality is relative to the concious observer who watches and experience it.
Now if we have simulators I strongly believe we were created to never meet them with our conciouness capabilities. They did it that way. It was on purpose. This is why Gods to me are just Mega Avatars but just that. Another quality of the same Avatars that we are. Gods are not our real simulators. They were just created like us.
@@deepdude4719 Doesn't really answer his question, if there are ´´levels of reality´´there must be a level in its purest form also.
I get the feeling that whoever programmed this simulation doesn't like me.
If the source were to simulate nothing but love then the simulation would be worthless. Life is about experiencing everything less that pure love.
I don't think we have the option of what body we jump into that'd be cheating
Krishna loves you hare krishna ..
Same
same lol
when he saiddd “phizzlezophigal zombies”
3:00
💀💀😂😂
Mike F. Hahaha.
I felt dat.
Thank you. I scrolled passed your comment as he said that. 🤣
Hahahaha
He can't say a lot of big words 😂 he just kinda munbles them like he can't get the words out fast enough
Here's where I always have a problem with asserting that we're in a simulation. Logically, we can assert that we *might* be in a simulation, but we don't have any way of determining the likelihood of being in a simulation. There are in infinite range of possibilities on why we might be in a simulation, and an infinite range of possibilities of why we might not be in a simulation. We have no way of knowing if one is more likely than the other, and no test to rule out either possibility. Physics doesn't "prove" that we're in a simulation, it merely proves that it is possible that we're in a simulation.
I think if we live in a simulation then perspective affects your reality. Maybe one way to test it is to change your perspective on something physical like your body. If we live in a simulation then we should be able to customize our avatar even if we’re midway through the game. Idk if that makes sense lol
@@edithserafina1002 You two are very brave, embracing your instincts and thoughts is the only way to find love 💕
@@edithserafina1002 no customization because hard core mode activated
Good point. We may all be in a simulation, we might not be. We all might be in a dream by some superior being, and we might not be. I guess it depends on your perception. Some say perception itself is merely an illusion masking some grander truth for everyone and everything.
What are some of the arguments against the possibility we are living in a simulation? I am asking so that viewers can have a balanced perspective after watching this video
that we are living a simulation seems far fetched, but when the issue becomes a metaphor for what's happening, then it gets scary
The Problem with the simulation within a simulation theory is that it fails to incorporate the Law of Entropy, which means that each additional simulation in the chain after the original lacks enough information to be either believable or sustainable.
😳🙄🤔
That could be why we're starting to question it.
I admire the perseverance and dogeddness of scientists who spend tireless decades looking for something... anything to unravel the mysteries of the Reality we exist in . The ingenuity of some of them and the creativity of others . Truly admirable .
The majority live and die in obscurity , but are no less heroic and pioneering than those whom the media celebrates and the ones given lofty awards.
" The Unknown Scientist " is no less valuable to societies as the " Unknown Soldier" who gave their lives for their country.
Thank you for writing this as it gives me hope. I was just wading in a cesspool of TH-cam political comments. I needed to hear someone with an intelligent artistic/poetic bent.
What a beautiful comment!
It's the Human condition why what how.
The only "proofs" I know of that we are a simulation are as followed:
• We sometimes forget why we go in a room
• Deja Vu
• We have a brain, but don't understand most of its wiring. Simulations prevent the AI from knowing it is a simulation.
• Simulations will always have bugs, maybe mental disorders are the bugs
• Dreams
• The statement I've never heard out loud before but somehow I know --> "the body needs sleep to reboot". Computer term (this one is a stretch lol)
• Time perceptions depending on activities done.
• And last one, our DNA could very well be another form of binary code
I think if we put our heads together lol we could make a fence 😅
Why would forgetting why we go in a room be proof of simulation 😂
@@greenwxy344 because going into a room and forgetting could be proof that, at times, you are being controlled in the simulation.
Such as when you are playing a video game and you need to go somewhere for a mission, but you do not remember which room it is. You then check a room and back out to find which room you wanted to be in.
Andy Carranza you are braking my brain i would love to have a conversation with you🤩
Mogly FoZ I think your brain is already broke
I love that this in media city in Salford , I used to live a five minute walk from there
“I’m going to convince you”
….- proceeds to not convince me even 1%
this was not well executed. very poor presentation on a very interesting subject
Plus epilepsy.
At the same time, I think there is more examples and content that he wanted to show that would made the presentation better, but he must have had a tight time restraint.
Slurred half his words, so off putting I got 3 minutes in and now have Forrest Whittacker eye
Wait for the really smart ppl who pretend they get it and can explain but never do
Totally agree. This is the first ever TED video I've seen that I downvoted. Presentation matters.
This is when a scientist doesn't even know he's basically reaffirming creation buy a higher power. A simulation is in essence a creation.
so?
No, Thats not how simulations work.
@@abulkalam9728 so simulations create themselves out of thin air or space? And I'm not talking about how they work.
Only thing it proves is that the universe is purely information based and probabilistic, Uneducated theists Like you jump to conclusion without doing the sufficient research, The universe could be self sustaining, Holographic blackholes exists mathmatically.
There is a reason he is not jumping into higher power, And you are.
He got nobel, Annnnd we dobnt even have the minimal education on physics.
I took shrooms and was watching a documentary on how perfect the universe. It touched on this subject also. The day before I’d been talking to a mate about lucid dreaming. And how desirable that is to me. And then I had the incredible realisation. I looked at my hand and I made my finger tips touch my thumb in order. I realised regardless of how what or why I am…. I conscious that I am right here, right now. No lucid dream needed. I am In something better than that.
the craziest part is, if we are simulated, the simulator is telling us through simulations that we are simulated.
🤣🤣🤣👍
I've been saying for twenty years that life is a simulation nested in infinite simulations and people thought I was talking crazy
Omg me too! and I always had a gut feeling about it too
On the same team here, the difference is I keep it to myself and thought I am crazy
Theories coming to life😊
@@firaajn You mean programmed by leaders of this world npc's
Because you are talking crazy, this idea contradicts itself and is therefore impossible
I think he is trying to fit several hours of information and theory into 15 minutes.
no, he is trying to fit a trivial, childish thought, into a 15 minute drunken ramble..
..for an audience who is easily impressed by titles and degrees..
Adam First So I take it you don't think we are living in a simulation. Im going to go out on a limb here and further guess that u r religious?
Julian H
yes, you guessed right.. i dont jump on every bandwagon theory that oozes out of a drunkard’s hallucinations..
and no, im not religious, however i do believe that the Designed, Measured, Controlled, Logical, Methodical and Intelligent CREATION we see ALL around us.. was in fact CREATED.. by a Creator..
as for this “theory”.. if you subscribe to it.. i have a few questions..
is the SOFTWARE for your “simulated universe” running on a REAL PLATFORM? REAL HARDWARE?? and if so, WHO made it, and WHERE is it?
why does the proponent of this “simulated” concept.. wear SUNSCREEN??. remember, THERE IS NO SUN..!!!
if its really just a game.. and there is no “space” or “reality”.. or “life”.. how does a PERSON, become an ASTRO-PHYSICIST, or COSMOLOGIST?? and study the non-existant universe?
Sure you do 👎
@@adamfirst3772 You don't understand anything about this theory... Let me first start by saying: believing in a creator is basically equivalent to simulation theory; someone who designed, measured, controlled etc.
The basis of simulation theory is that based on the incredibly rapid development and progress we have seen in virtual environments (from 10x10 pixels 40 years ago to life-like renderings), our civilization will likely advance to a point where we are able to create our own simulated realities. The only thing stopping us from doing so right now is raw computing power (there are other things we currently lack but computing power is the most significant). Eventually, we may be collectively smart enough to build mega structures that harness the energy output of the sun, and if that isn't sufficient perhaps the energy of multiple stars or even the entire galaxy. This may be thousands to millions of years from now, and to say that humans will still exist is perhaps a large uncertainty, but it remains plausible. If we make it to this point, we will very likely have the ability to simulate basically anything. Maybe even the ability to simulate an entire universe itself with its own laws of physics, similar to how a creator may have created our universe (see how they are pretty much the exact same thing).
Based on your "few questions," I can see that you don't entirely understand what a "simulation" is. It is not a video "game," where the people who created the simulation get to play as characters. It would likely at the least be our entire solar system simulated with laws of physics and such so that the simulated beings can get sunburns because the sun is a completely functioning virtual star. Also, the humans in the simulation would be fully functioning and would think for themselves and have their own simulated brains. Or as I said before, maybe the entire universe can be simulated and the "creators" are undergoing an experiment to see if life is able to form or not? There are many possibilities. I think that if humans in our reality are able to perform a simulation, they would start by simulating Earth in different ways to see how life was created and how it evolved and stuff like that.
Sorry for all the reading lol.
If we are a simulation, extrapolating from our "known" universe may be meaningless, as the "real" universe may be vastly different.
I figured this out a long time ago. Too many coincidences and too many built-in conflicts that seem to appear for no reason.
If I’m a simulation then why am I watching a video about us being in a simulation while he pretends that we’re in a simulation to prove we’re in a simulation
Hypedup Diesel fr for real
Watch the egg
becuse if were a simulation the likehood were the first is low
Hypedup Diesel lmao
@ES Crez
That's not a religion.
3:06 = talking about zombies made my eyes glaze over (what does this have to do with simulators)
4:58 = argument from probability fallacy (what is likely has no bearing on what is actual)
5:18 = begging the question fallacy (tell me more about the psychology of beings from other planets, please)
5:45 = circular reasoning fallacy (i believe it, that proves it)
9:42 = argument from "citation needed" (what makes you think that 1 in 3, or more, people is a sim)
13:08 = argument from invalid authority (google experts are not physicists, anthropologists or psychologists)
14:28 = self-refuting argument (human says he can prove hes not real, says it's not able to make such discernment)
14:38-17:40 "cool story bro" (not interesting nor relevant)
19:08-end = argument from ignorance (i dont know. therefore, conclusion is true)
We don't see things as they are; we see them as we are.
Good job bro
I agree, the topic is very interesting but there are a ton of better arguments
Lol that would have saved me 20 minutes of my life
That time we all had our first-year logic course and liked throwing around terms like 'straw man argument'
"A stimulated species isn't allowed to break the law by programming to speak about STIMULATION"
It’s true, I’m a developer of “life & earth ; phase 4” y’all better check your stats! This decade gonna be crazy
woah really?
He has a good point... why am I watching this instead of porn?
Harry Bodenhagen because your simulation is rated PG
You guys are epic lol
@@Bak_it_up on my way
😀
It's the only way to truly know
I told my dad we'd be uploading our minds by 2045. He just gave a stare at the wall and said, "Skynet"
I agree, and I'm curious is if that's how we'll finally begin to travel in time. While the Laws of Physics prevent us, in this dimension, to travel because of factors like speed of light and gravity, would those same laws apply inside a computer?
It's gonna be starlink🙄
@@JayWest14 I've thought about what you said for a while. And I believe the answer is no. We'll only be limited by the constraints of previous programming.
@@JayWest14 time travel is an exploit with the physics engine. you can get banned. i wouldnt try it.
@@katiebosko8263 weeb
i’m honestly just scared of being in a simulation. i feel like i’m gonna cry realizing my whole life was a lie if we’re just people on a computer. i don’t know why
Dude stop ur freaking me out 😂
What change would that make to your life? Just keep on living simulation or not. Experience and be grateful you were programmed hahaha
@16:04 The question posed is: " Which of these is longer?"
The answer given: "They are the same"
The correct answer: The top one is longer as it spans the entire width of the paper, while the bottom one does not( we will assume that The paper is a perfect rectcangle.
If the question was posed thusly: "Which of these LINES is longer?"
Then the answer would be that they are the same
Summary:
One of the following three propositions must be true.
(a) No civilization in the universe will ever be able to construct a simulated reality (it could be impossible)
(b) Any civilization that could construct a simulated reality would not want to do so (ethical considerations, cost, etc.)
(c) We are almost certainly living in a simulation (simulated universes would vastly outnumber non-simulated universes)
Smoot spends the majority of the talk arguing that propositions (a) and (b) are unlikely, so (c) must be true. He recognizes that this conclusion does not sit well with most people, but he shows that we are naturally ill-equipped to reason about these kinds of things, so our intuition may not be trustworthy.
He concludes by suggesting that physics may be a way for us to determine whether we are living in a simulated universe or not. For example, the contradictions between general relativity and quantum mechanics may not be due to our inability to come up with better theories, but rather due to the fact that there is different programming for small scale and large scale elements of our universe.
He also argues that the holographic principle, entanglement, and the quantized nature of our universe might all indicate that we live in a simulation.
A pretty good summary.
I also recall reading an article (it even had its abstract posted on phys.org) where a group of theoretical phsysicists pointed out another thing: anyone wanting to simulate our physical universe would have to solve certain well-defined sets on non-linear differential equations (just to make things work in the simulation). Regardless of what specific methods they use (we know several, they may have more) those methods can be grouped into several categories in their approach. Using purely mathematical methods, authors were able to show that *if* any method from a specific (rather large and general) group was used, there will be observable effects in the universe which will behave subtly differntly in the model as opposed to the real thing.
The effects they identified are unfortunately still beyond our capability to test today but surprisingly - not by far. Another generation or two of supercolliders and something like LHC Mk2 or 3 might be able to test it. Negative result won't be conclusive - it would only rule out *one* possible category of models. But imagine for a moment that it comes back positive... meaning that we would know for *certain* not only that we are a simulation, but even what kind of simulation! Wouldn't that be something...
Jared Jacobsen Good summary. If we do live in a simulation, the next exciting question is: is it possible for us to interact with the *real* word? Is there an interface / "exit" somewhere? (Matrix phone booth?).
Or, at least, can we somehow take advantage of the knowledge that we're a simulation: e.g. can we figure out and take advantage of the limitations of the simulation?
If none of the above is accessible, then as far as we're concerned, it doesn't make much of a difference if we are a simulation or real.
thank you for the summary!!!
Jared Jacobsen I don't see why so many people think general relativity and quantum mechanics are incompatible. It is well known that similar events take place differently on different scales. The motion of a galaxy isn't the same as the motion of a planet, or as a pebble tossed into a pond. There are many orders of magnitude in the Universe, and Quantum forces simply even out on larger scales, while they have more impact on smaller scales. I don't randomly move around for no reason at my human scale, but most of my particles do that all the time. If general relativity and quantum mechanics were incompatible, you wouldn't exist. It's that simple. General relativity and quantum mechanics must be compatible for the Universe to exist as it does.
krillin6 It's not that they are "incompatible". It's just that we haven't yet figured out the exact connection between them.
doesn't quite prove anything using physics as he states he would...
'doesn't quite prove' is a massive understatement lol.
Actually it did. Take a physics class.
No it fails miserably. You should study epistemics before you form conclusions. Some wisdom and humor there for you.
(and this vid has little to do with rigorous physics)
Yep, Nobel Prize winner loses, you win. End of conversation.
Oh I see... a bunch of hypothesis proved it right....
You should know for starters there is nothing proveable in any science other than math to begin with before you lecture others as obviously you haven't had much education yourself.
And this is not even a theory but a hypothesis backed by nothing but vague supositions.
Sorry, you lose. End of conversation.
I think this would be so much better and powerful if he wasn’t so shy
Can the characters on a video game ever realise they are in a game.
Of course not, that fact alone debunks this guys entire premise.
Going into this I said no way I would ever believe we are a simulation....
It was tough to follow at first but about 14 min in I started wondering if we are in an endless stream of simulations where death simply begins your next simulation.
Ok, you got me.
Or u get to be a time traveler if u get to the highest level...lol
You are right on point. Look for the egyptian book of the dead and you will agree with yourself. Death is your next metaverse in this chain of simulated worlds.
The mechanism for the new simulation after the death of the meat suit is reincarnation.
ie reincarnation exactly it all comes full circle you’ve been here forever just different lives or simulations it’s endless
When the anti religious science types figure out they were wrong, and turn to creationism they add their little video game modern touches to what religion said millenea ago. How wholly unoriginal can you be?
One video where the comments are actually better than the video itself!
HONISTLY
We all have experienced sadness from love, this pain we experienced is there to make sure we never doult this force that bind us; LOVE!
We are as « real » as this pain we experience from loosing one another and, therefore, we are as « real » as this love that bind us.
13:00 literally talking about Sophia and the meta verse lmaooo
It is just me, but everytime when I go somewhere like a store or fastfood chain, I enter and it's dead as lonely and as soon as I turn around people start showing up from everywhere?!!
Happens all the time to me! Like my presence makes the simulation catch up
Everyone heads to the cashier at the same time. The few cars on the hwy with you take your exit. If you sit in your car in a parking lot there's no one driving, as soon as you put your car into drive, some vehicle(s) interrupt your path either by pulling in front of you, making you have to wait or taking extra time at a stop sign that you could have already passed.
Some believe that we're living in some kind of reality TV show and we're being watched by a higher race 🤷🏽♂️
This is actually a movie called The Truman Show. With Jim Carrey I recommand IT !! IT is a must watch
This is true because I am the higher race. I've tapped into this sim just to reply to your comment. I'm going to lvl you up shortly.
South Park episode
@@wowcool8749 LMAO
"I always feel like. . . Somebody's watching meee"
Even in the simulation… you have people talking about the simulation! 🤯🤯🤯
Probably not the best thing to be watching after experiencing derealization after too much VR gaming but here we are
He's a Nobel prize, not an entertainer; but don't let the delivery distract you. One of the best talks on the subject.
Well, he didn’t sound very convincing to me.
Worst TED Talk I've seen. Not only did his talk not convince me, it didn't even push me in that direction. Worse, I already lean in the direction of believing we may be a simulation and this actually made me question that small belief that I have.
He hasnt said anything worth noting so far 14 minutes in so.. as long as it is real in our minds it is reality. How do you explain sleeping? Having a conscious? Making decisions? Doing things on our own time how we decide? This tin foil hat theory contradicts everything that has been so for 4 billion years.
@@austinh.1293 You do know that, if we were in a simulation, "everything that has been so for 4 billion years" would simply be simulated? You can't refute a simulation using our reality, since it isnt necessarily real. How can you know, that you are able to make your own decisions? If your'e mind was simulated, you could neither prove nor refute that, because any conclusion you could possibly make would be based on the simulation.
@@xhan1167 exactly. And potentially based on the 'options' that the matrix central computer may feed to you, as you are one with the matrix. Kinda like TV guides - we think we are choosing but really we are choosing from the choices we have been given.
If we're in a simulation, I need a better player.
If you're a player...
I think we're in simulation and we're self aware AI.
@@SalvationMage we're in real life just get the joke 😄
He said “theres a “meta verse” with multiple universes in it” bruh 8 years ago
Everything has been planned from yrs ago
I don't think people realize what "downloading your brain" means... Downloading or copying a brain more than likely isn't the same thing as transferring your consciousness.
Bingo!
So because all religions and sciences cannot formulate a conclusive or definitive reason of this amazing universe we are a part of, they hypothesize another formula that will also perplex you and will never be concluded too. Life is too short to contemplate "what if" scenarios. Just enjoy and make the most of what you have been given!
We're all hallucinating all the time, even right now! It's just when we agree and accept the hallucination, we call it reality...
You need to be checked lol
The mystic teenager needs to cease to exist.
Good point. Sensory evolution possibly leads to that, such that we evolve to perceive what keeps us alive, even if it hides what is actually there.
Wow a totally original thought that you for sure came up with!
@@UknowJow yess lmaooo
Athiests: we are in a simulation
Literally every prophet sent to mankind: Am I a joke to you?
Simulation makes more sense than god for sure
Maybe the prophets were the programmers, that came here to guide us into better lives, and give us hope.
@@toddymcgann5856 and any civilization who can do such a think is considered godly
@@toddymcgann5856 no it doesn’t. They’re literally the same thing. Both based off of misconceptions and a lack of understanding of natural phenomena mixed with our imagination
What if "we" are all the AI? Or possibly were all the same conscious being experiencing this simulation all at once from all the different perspectives?
It's not a matter of physics to say whether or not we are a simulation. It's not within the domain of physics. Physics isn't the study of everything.
Consciousness is irreducible. It's not another thing. It can be simulated in that we can simulate it for video games, or in machine learning projects, but that is simulated consciousness, and not consciousness itself, and the distinction can be extremely important (depending on the issue). The Chinese Room problem in philosophy demonstrates this distinction.
"...and then the supercomputer said: "let there be light"". -A. C. Clarke
HAHAHAHAHAHA 🤣
@Dark Hacker "One Billion Names of God".
💀💀
There can be only one
This was excellent in explaining.
Life is like a Video Game, We Spawn as a random character, with random characteristics, in a random place / time zone on Earth, we have challenges and obstacles..Except we don’t respawn, We only get one life.
A video game is like life. We were here first.
I died over 10 times but I’m still here 🤷♂️
We make our own decisions with a conscious mind
Want to view the control room of this matrix? Smoke DMT (Dimethyltryptamine).
Cemel Dosce... after that, the problem becomes putting into words and understandable terms what you've experienced once you've returned. As soon as you start to objectify such abstract concepts - the things that have no analogy in our universe - the point is missed. The importance is downplayed. The experience becomes a memory of a joyride. Sure, you are now able to understand that all the bullshit you experienced before is just bullshit, but the experience that is so incredibly important intermingles and becomes part of the bullshit. We now know that we're not even remotely conscious enough to understand god, but how much closer does that get us? Does breaking down that barrier get us anywhere? Just want to know your thoughts.
Darren Pope yes, more people need to be talking about this and asking these type of questions
adam smith I am not against drugs - I have used them all my life even well into my 50s, albeit no more, but let us not think that what we experience under their influence is a more accurate truth. Drugs alter the way the brain process information and the experiences are as likely to be self-deceiving as much as some sort of insight. I blame Aldous Huxley for such nonsense.
Paul Roberston I agree for manufactured drugs, although even these can give you useful insights for the reality we experience when not on drugs, but DMT seems like a different matter to me. DMT is a substance that is provided to us by nature, naturally included in our 'design' and everything in our bodies serves a purpose. You can have similar but less intense experiences by meditating and maybe it wasn't intended for us to reach as high levels as we do when we purposely increase the amount, but when we do we seem to welcomed at that place. Also the fact that everybody experiences a very similar experience with it is interesting to me since most other drugs depend much more on the person itself and where he let's his thoughts take him.
Want to view the control room and hack the Matrix?
Meditate!
OMMM SHANTI!
"People are asleep when they die they wake up" Imam Ali (cousin of prophet Muhammad pbuh)
Edit: This doesnt mean that life is stimulation it means that this all temporary.
That's why all the famous stars kill them selves ...they got bored and wanted to hit the next level already?? [Not encouraging suicide]
@@sergioregalado6256 Exactly they think they reached their full potential and have nothing to achieve left.
@@bleach--__--2493 Devs should publish some Endgame-Content.
@@MinisterSillywalks lol
1. The theory of evolution came from the hindu brahmins
2. Panthiestical Evolution was passed down by pythagoras to the Greeks
3. Thales and his ionic school branched out from panthiestic evolution to naturalistic evolution
4. Plato and Aristotle's evolutionary ideas were dispersed through the Alexandrian school in egypt
5. The ideas were followed through into the middle ages (Aquinas), Renaissance and into Freemasonry, where they were preserved
6. Freemasonry and the enlightenment had a rebirth of the philosophy
7. Lord Monboddo and Erasmus Darwin carried the philosophy foward
8. Charles Darwin developed the idea
This is what the cool kids believe these days 😂🤫
The ultimate truth hides behind death. So many people have discovered it yet unable to share with us.
"All the world's a stage and all the men and women, merely players"
that's actually really cool that the brains nueronal network can be mapped. It'a amazing
the real arrogance is thinking we are conscious and not strictly enslaved by instincts.
Yeah, we humans like to think pretty highly of ourselves.
Do you identify as a wolf?
I am a wolf (metaphorically speaking that is).....ever met one before?
Er. but consciousness and behaviour are two entirely different things. Do you mean 'free will' vs instinct? Or 'thinking' vs instinct maybe?
Empty Head why so complicated? Instinct vs thinking vs free will vs mind vs heart vs conscious vs sub conscious ? It's all coming from one you, your mind . It's all choice. like, whether you decide to eat salad today or ice cream, but you can't have ice cream because you already have one yesterday, today should be the salad day. But for some reason today you are depressed, so you make an exceptional, but you eventually ended up salad anyway because you don't want to feel guilt.
Fun presentation
19:00 3rd point down from the top: 'Is that do to our limited ability to resolve so far'. “Do To” or “Due To” ? How To Remember Which One to Use. Remember this: do to is never the correct option. If you're trying to show that something is caused by something else, the correct expression to use is due to. However, you should always remember that due to the fact is wordy and should be avoided. "Now, back to your regularly scheduled program."