Well I don't have any issues in the multiplayer so yeah every time i play it takes only like 3-6 min which is fine sometimes it is even faster. Maybe ure just online at the wrong time or you are on a different Server cuz I m playing in the EU. And Resident Evil 3 is not lazy.
If Resident Evil 4 and 5 taught me anything : green + green = about 50% of total health restoration green + red = full one hundred, just like as if you used a first aid spray Consuming green+green combo is good, if your health is not in red zone (let's say if you have like 40 % of total health, and you use that G+G and then your total health is 90 %). I'd rather keep green+red combo if I get messed up real bad and health is very low.
How is Jill leading nemesis away from the train filled with survivors a stupid decision? Nemesis wants Jill and will kill everyone in her way, if she ran back to the train (which wasn't ready to go yet) nemesis would've killed all of them easily, a shutter isn't gonna stop him. I get that they died later anyway but her leading nemesis away was the smart decision because Nemesis was only interested in her, no one else. Resident Evil 3 is rushed and stuff but her decisions aren't stupid considering she knows how to fight these monsters. This isn't her first game she's done her time being the survivor in resi 1 she's used to this zombie rodeo.
Pastafarian it’s stupid because as already shown literally within the first 2 minutes of the game, the plot allows basic things to stop Nemesis such as bookshelves tripped in front of doors - so a metal shutter would likely stop this tame version of Nemesis we got. Jill didn’t have to lead him away.
So Jill facing Nemesis alone makes sense because, according to you, she somehow knows how to fight him, but Jill facing Nemesis with help from several Umbrella mercs means he would've "killed all of them easily"? In the food chain of the game Stars members are supposed to be above zombies and Lickers by the time RE3 happens, so you're correct in saying that Jill knows what she's doing. But that is where Nemesis is supposed to come in and flip the hierarchy upside down. Which is precisely what he does in the original. He shows up out of nowhere and one-shots Brad and from then on it's established that he is the alpha predator in Raccoon City. And other characters including Jill act accordingly, meaning they're terrified of this seemingly unstoppable terminator-like monstrosity. Now you have a strong and oppressive horror setting and a terrifying almost invulnerable antagonist as a result. R3make fucks this up absolutely. Nemesis never kills Brad and keeps failing constantly, and all of the other characters keep trash talking and insulting him. As a result horror is barely there and the antagonist is too weak to be taken seriously since no one else takes him seriously either. Now if you want Jill to flip things back and take on Nemesis willingly you can do that later in the game. Once she's been through many encounters and actually knows what he is and what he is capable of, and once she's well equipped, and once a good enough reason is given. Then you can have that "I'll give you Stars" moment and have it mean something, unlike in R3make where they even fucked that up by mistiming it within the story. So to conclude what Jill did was stupid. It was heroic and that is admirable, but it was stupid. She knows pretty much nothing about Nemesis by then, her gear is weak, she refuses help from heavily armed mercenaries, and she willing and blindly runs towards what should be the greatest and most dangerous threat she ever faced. It even makes her look incompetent since like you said, she survived the mansion and should know what a Tyrant is by now, so she should know better than to face one intentionally with nothing but a shotgun and a pistol.
While I dont think it shouldnt have been priced at $60 I do feel like you just had a bad experience overall because I didnt get any glitches and the weapons/combat isnt that clunky, I liked the weapon system, it gave you enough ammo to get through section and it was up to how you used the different weapons to defeat the enemies. The inventory system was the same as RE2 remake, I it forced you to figure out what is important to keep while on the run. You definitely had some nitpicks in this because you complained about the inventory system which was the exact same as RE2 remake and the fact that the game pauses when in the inventory menu... like really?
Still a puddle of a game, no Mercenaries mode, no game altering decisions, no unique locations, and a dumbed down story which plays into tropes i.e big bad antagonist that does dumb shit
I love this channel, I do, but I fee like this is the worst commentary yet. I’m not going to defend RE3 for its flaws but Jill leading Nemesis away from the train makes sense. She knows the train will take time to get going. She’s a cop, not just a cop but a member of STARS. Listen, man, RE has always been over the top and cheesy. It’s part of the quirk. It’s really not as stupid as you make it seem.
The city, the police station, the whole buildup to the train escape, the train crash, the clock tower, the hospital, the park, the lab. The journey. The ambiance, the music, the tension, the ammo shortage, the survival, the horror, the fear. Yeah, I guess it was impossible to honor all these dumb things.
If you don't like the Resident Evil inventory system, why are you playing Resident Evil games? RE7's real time inventory is an anomaly with RE5 and 6. Every single other main RE game pauses while in inventory.
I think he means pausing the in-game timer specifically, not just the game. In all other RE games the in-game timer is still running even when you’re in the inventory and it effects your rating at the end. Adds more tension to your time management and decision making.
@@JC-cb8oi That's not what he was talking about at all. He said that in Resident evil games the action continues while you're sifting through your inventory in order to stress you out, and showed a comparison of re7 doing exactly that to prove his point. He said that's how Resident evil games are supposed to be, oblivious of the fact that that's basically the only one that operates that way. He said nothing about rankings or the game timer at all. It couldn't have been any more clear that he was talking about the action. He just got that one wrong plain and simple.
With a game like this there should have rarely been a safe moment. Nemesis should have been following you everywhere. His head poping out of sewers and mailboxes even .
Ok point, both totally different games, the originals will always be better, because we had the creators back then working 20hour days with dreams and not money, and we had the best creator writers in japan, this goes for resident evil 2 remake, it had a better team
More content is subjective. FF7 Remake had so much filler. It took too long to get to the great moments of that game. RE3 was infinitely more enjoyable even if it's only 5 hours long at best.
I liked the game, but I do agree that it's pretty flawed. I never had an issue with Jill leading Nemesis away from the survivors though. Seemed like the correct choice given the circumstances. Like, the alternative was to lead Nemesis down to the train, with Carlos...and all the civilians. Her goals were to keep the civilians safe and give Carlos time to prepare the train. Neither of those thing could happen if Nemesis was down there with them. Leading him away was the only option, and I actually like the scene, it defines Jill as both clever and brave. But this isn't the first time I've seen a knee-jerk to this scene...perhaps the game doesn't do a good enough job at describing the stakes?
I have to desagree with your opinion in that metro scene that it may sound stupid at first, but she is a cop. First i have to.say o agree with you, RE3 is Lazy, but i have to defend these scene, but i really enjoy you're Channel That Said, It may be stupid that she tries to sacrifice herself, but she doesen't want nemesis to reach the survivors. She is awere that nemesis ia after her, but If she proceded at that moment at the train, everyone.would have died because of her. And that person is Jill for me:a cop. An hero. Just my little opinion of course. RE3 sucks...but it's good...but It sucks hahahahahah
The moment at the 9:50 mark after Jill died from being stupid, this Corona Ad starts playing with this sad music as if in memorandum of Jill and I DIED 😭😭😭
the problem isn't that it's short every RE game is short but that's why it has replay value to make up for it. RE3's problem is cut content and barely any replay value and nemesis is hardly in it
The Crow of Yharnam The biggest issues for me are that Nemesis isn't a consistent threat like Mr. X and certain areas should've been expanded upon, namely the clock tower and city streets. I would've loved to see a semi-open city section where you explore for items and get through puzzles while Nemesis stalks you.
The real issue is cut content namely lacks of certain location and live selection. Secondly, those ridiculous price tag. No one will complaint if it was $30.
This is so true and your the first person I've heard address this, with certain games I understand not counting the cutscenes but the RE games not only are the cutscenes high quality but they are just super crucial to the story and experience, you are missing out on a huge part of the game I still rewatch them all if I replay the RE games And by skipping them your missing out on such a large portion of the games while a lot of other games I'd say you could get away with skipping every cut scene without missing out on much
Its funny how many people shit on RE3 remake for being so short, but so was the original and so was the RE2 remake. The RE2 remake can be easily beaten under 2 and a half hrs. Especially if you are going for S ranks. RE was neber about length but replays.
I can't help noticing that Nemesis is apparently trying not to kill Jill in all the cutscenes. Everyone around her is taken out within literal seconds, but Jill is given opportunities to get away every bloody time that it could have become it's own subplot.
@@garettstrath1152 you're right, I'm glad you're liking it, I just feel they had a chance to really expand on the original concept but they kind of just played it safe and simple which is kind of a bummer considering the other remakes are almost better than the originals
@@heartman64 I hope they don't fuck up RE4 Remake, that's my favorite one in the series and just hope they do it complete justice and don't leave anything out
RE3R and FF7R isn't a good comparison you're comparing an RPG which is expected to be dozens of hours long to a survival horror game which is supposed to short as that's how all RE games are the problems are cut content, barely any replay value and nemesis is barely in the game
Took me a dozen hours in single player. You must be a game god! Loved how action packed and visceral it was. Better than most action movies. I got it for $20. Well worth it.
Honestly I could.overlook most of this game's flaws(the abundance of ammo, short length etc) if it wasn't for 3 things: 1. Easily the biggest problem is that 90% of the time, NEMESIS IS NOT SCARY, HE IS A JOKE! He can be taken out with a single grenade and he is only scary during the section of the game where he chases you around the downtown area and even that doesn't last for very long. He is only scary all the way through on Nightmare and Inferno ,but by that point it doesn't matter, because the main game ruined the suprise factor and menace it should have. 2. This game puts more time and energy into pointless QTEs and baysplosions than actually giving us puzzles, the multiple choice system.... stuff that gave the original its identity 3. Last but not least, the cut content. R2MAKE cut some stuff as well, but at least it made up for it with bonus content and actually making a lot of improvements to what WAS in the game. This game cut out entire sections from the game and replaced them with crappier versions or ,even worse, it teases you with them. You fight doggo Nemesis outside the clocktower but you don't actually go in there. If they had cut out the crappy section thst were bad in the original to begin with, people wouldnn't complain, but this is just agregious.
2003 was a 5 hour campaign was fine. I played many short games countless times because it was fun. But today unfortunately it's not. I have not the motivation anymore to play it 4-5 times over
I really enjoyed RE3 so I don't agree with you fully. However, it was definitely a short game and I don't think the price value of £50 was justified for the "average" player. I got my money's worth out of it but I think I'm in the minority with that. Actually, let me say this: if RE2make wasn't so good and didn't get me hyped up then I doubt I would be so forgiving for RE3make. I didn't have any issue with the gameplay (even Carlos's RE4 style cabin mission didn't bother me). It's just there wasn't enough of it. Inferno mode was completed by me but it's a meme difficulty and Nemmy4 inferno is too hard on a PS4 controller and too easy with a keyboard and mouse. I didn't like how Nemmy basically turned into a dog. Why did they do this I wonder? He was a lot more intimidating when he's sprinting to slap the back of your head. Also, once you understand walking Nemmy he's ridiculously easy to avoid thanks to the placement of single-use exploding barrels and electrocution. Because the game is so short, it doesn't matter that the barrels are single-use because you only need to use them once. Electrocution followed by a grenade is enough to down nemmy as well. Once you understand this the fear factor is just gone.
j3s0n The biggest issues for me are that Nemesis isn't a consistent threat like Mr. X and certain areas should've been expanded upon, namely the clock tower and city streets. I would've loved to see a semi-open city section where you explore for items and get through puzzles while Nemesis stalks you.
Capcom: "We've got enough funding for 2 good RE-remakes, which ones we gonna do?" Devs: "2 and 4, we can take 2 assets to make 3 with a multiplayer too, and test head tentacle tech for 4 and make nemesis more like saddler too"
9:20 For all the hate against "muh feminism" agendas, you decided to bring up that topic where it wasn't even warranted. Where Jill immediately dies in the next linear sequence after that? That's on you because you were controlling her and couldn't dodge an attack. It's bad game design to make the next gameplay segment a tight hallway, sure, but that doesn't excuse you as a bad player yourself. Anyone and their mother could've survived that if they just decided to use a first aid item first. (Spoilers Below) Secondly, to make your argument sound valid, you glossed over how Jill got all people in the train killed later by being inside the train herself... because Nemesis chased her there. It's inferred that Nemesis relentlessly stalks her and would cause collateral damage to others if Jill had stayed in the subway. It's not mindblowing storytelling, but it's straightforward enough that it's more obtuse to extrapolate it as social commentary rather than taking it in face value as a simple plot device.
"sure, but that doesn't excuse you as a bad player yourself. " but he wasn't talking about playing he was talking about how he felt jill making a bad decission. I don't think him dying had anything to do with his thoughts on that since he didn't say he was mad about dying he said that what jill did was a stupid decission so i don't know why you even bother mentioning that. I understand the rest tho but the excuse yourself as a bad player doesn't work since that was never what he got mad at. He didn't get annnoyed by dying. I understand the spoiler part that makes sense but that other part doesn't really mean anything because that was never his point to begin with it was not him raging at him getting killed or something. So saying he could have survived that is kinda missing the point. There is no point to mention something that he didn't complain about.
Except Jill is intentionally trying to buy Carlos and the civilians time. She literally says that in the same exact clip, so she's not doing a "stupid decision." She's trying to be selfless because she knows Nemesis is after her, not them.
@@bluemooninthedaylight8073 lol true. Since Nemesis follows her everywhere, she should have known better. Then, after Nemesis kills the passengers, Jill tries to take on Nemesis with her bare hands, it seems. Lucky, Mikhail told her to leave
I'm starting to believe that games that are naturally conceptually average are harder to make and often end in lazy products. It's the nature of how interested one could be in a concept type thing.
Yes, because not being able to find the healing item you need while in a boss fight because the game doesn't pause in the inventory is a great thing. That's not unfair or frustrating, that won't make me think "wow, that was bullshit, I had no time to even select the fucking thing, what the fuck were they thinking?", just as it was in every single fucking Resident Evil game that didn't pause while you were in the inventory. Resident Evil is... was about making strategic decisions, not about being a Call of Duty game. The combat was more of a puzzle than a real combat, that's why you had limited resources, that's why you would die in just a few hits and had no health regeneration. You didn't need quick reflexes to get good at the games, you had to be smart and plan out everything correctly. Having all your strategy and plans be ruined because oh whoopsies you didn't move your cursor quick enough! just makes for an crappy experience.
My biggest gripe with this game, aside from the short playtime, is how they managed to make Jill SO unlikeable.... It was a far cry from the Jill I have loved since RE:1. Damn shame.
I loved this game and I think its great. It is disappointing they cut out so many parts. If they had just kept the clock tower in them with a few more hours of nemesis chasing you then most people would have been satisfied. But the game is still really good. Just not a good remake. Hopefully they add mercenaries mode in a free update at least
Hey dude I just subscribed to you after watching your last of us leak video.i appreciate you turning your comments off as I still don’t know the leak and am trying to keep it that way until launch just wanted you to know that whoever ruined it for you has failed in a way because it has got you at least one more sub keep up the good work work I enjoy watching the vids👍
Dude, do not mention the leak, in fact, delete this thread or at least remove the mention of the leak. Seriously, I know the leak and I know how tempting it is to shout it everywhere I go.
I played the demo and hated the fact you can do multiple head shots and they just keep shuffling towards you. Walking around didn't feel smooth either.
This game should've been another 1-2hrs atleast. With more exploration, puzzles and nemisis forms. It's a shame honestly. Resistance should been delayed until the fall and been a Outbreak remake akin to L4D and WWZ..
Completely agree. I am from the UK and game is £50 and I don't think it's worth that. I am enjoying the game but compared to resident evil 2 remake does feel like it's coasted of the success of that game
I loved the game and it actually got me more into resident evil so I’m fine with it’s length because I put more time in by doing speed runs and I had so much fun with it.
The Resistance side mode/game is actually coming around to being a good distraction/extra content but definitely not what fans wanted. When it comes to Resistance it's best to play with a group, I've done lots of solo and group quick play, and group play is definitely the way to play and dramatically improves matchmaking
There is one thing I hated about this game, which is the fact that they completely remove the RPD area with Jill. When playing RE2 there are some real structural damages to the walls - like the made entrance where you get the first emblem key - the very first time I played that I thought... well... Nemesis went through here. Yet this part is totally omitted and if you ho to 3rd floor as Carlos... well the wall is scracthless! Something does not adds up.... fun game, nemesis is fucking cool, freakishly great graphics yet it does has a crappy story
@@f10pped36 thats the case with in-between releases, they are usually given a lower development time and budget, made to fill the gap between main tittle games with the intention of retaining audiences, having a steady number of releases, cash in the residual value that fans are eager to pay after a great succes and a whole bunch of other reasons that may be involved.
I didn’t know about you, I played the game on hardcore and I enjoyed every second of it, took me 7 hours and half. If you were a resident evil die hard fan you would’ve played it on hardcore instead of standard
Thata why I'm waiting for a price drop for this one, no way I'm paying 60$ for a 4 hour game. Its such a shame to because resident evil 2 remake was one of my favorite games last year.
The better part of 3 years was spent on this remake. There were extensive models and live action stunt work, with tons of work put into the story, voice lines and motion capture. It’s one of the best looking games of the generation. You can say whatever you want about the game’s design. But calling it lazy is very disrespectful and not true.
Well that’s your opinion. I happen to love the game. I have over 40 hours just in the campaign. People like you think your opinion is he ultimate truth and the only one that matters. Last time I checked the game even had an 80 on metacritic. And it’s sold 2.5 mil.
Agreed. The characters, story and gameplay are all better in 3. Hell theres actually a soundtrack this time too. I love 2 but 3 improves on it a lot, theres a lot of replayability with the higher difficulties and shop. Calling its lazy its stupid.
I can agree fairly with the Lazy statement, it is, would be a almost perfect remake (for me) if they gave some love to iconic locations like clock tower and try to pull the live selection at some points with hopefully some alternate endings. Nightmare mode should be more easilly acessible since it adds a lot of fun with a new loadout of enemies and spawn location also the addiction of a randomizer mode would be cool too. We get the feel of love from some things, the character models and performance are amazing, city and music too, but it feel rushed. But man the critique on the Jill's choices are so out of place, RE pull this move since start waaay before Anita stuff
Mafia 2 still holds up today & doesn’t really need a remake. Mafia 3 on the other hand is the most repetitive, steaming piles of 💩games released in the last decade. It’s honestly the most disappointing game especially compared to how great 2 as a game was received so I’d definitely be all for a Mafia 3 remake no doubt about it
Im callin it now they’re unfortunately going to cut stuff out of re4 remake. Re4 was a massive compared to the games that came before it. Plus the inventory system was different in a way. & plus you had the treasures that you could buy & sell so how is that aspect going to work? Are they goin to get rid of the treasure all the way or is there goin to be a separate think for the treasure?
& i know in the re4 the treasure was separated from the other items when it came to storage. But the m2 studio is probably goin to be lazy & cut it out.
Y'know, I've heard countless TH-camrs say this, when talking about Resident Evil games. Specifically, when critiquing or reviewing one. @6:09 "[...]Clunky inventory [...]Designed to make you feel uncomfortable" Has this been actually confirmed or said from a Resident Evil developer, or even anyone at capcom? I'm fully just curious. I've never once felt like any of the RE games, but ESPECIALLY the newer ones starting with RE7 and onward, RE2make and RE3make, had a clunky inventory to make me feel "uncomfortable" I don't mean to put you on blas, or something like that, Luke. JUST Curious, as you're like the 100th person to mention it
Luke I like your stuff but this review was lazy. This was my first RE game and i absolutely loved it, Ive played through it 7 times and i think the shop as well as the higher difficulties really make the game more replayable than 2. Jill isn't feministy at all and its actually refreshing. The gameplay is clunky? Its got some of the smoothest gameplay ive ever played.
Completely agree, they blow all the effort and money on the ''cinematic'' stuff like the first person intro in Jill's apartment, while the actual game design and assets takes a back seat, most things are either directly recycled from RE2 or completely scrapped from the original game.
But for some reason, even though I hated the game for the same reasons you stated and also because the game was so short and re-used assets from RE7 and 2 Remake... I'll still HAVE to buy the next RE game capcom puts out because I've been involved in this franchise for pretty much my entire life, since I was 8. I'm shackled, hjelp
The 4 hour and 2 minute completion time was the gameplay minus cutscenes. If you look up to the right you'd see your total game time. But yeah the game felt lacking.
I don't want to convince you that the gave is a master piece or that it doesn't have any issues, but I do want to add some counter points to the discussion. First, I didn't even download the multiplayer, I have zero interest in it. I only played the main campaign, and I never played the original. I played every original RE game minus 3. With all that in mind I have to say that the two biggest issues I have with your critique is: what you said about it being fun, the inventory system. Toy said it's fun, you enjoyed the time you spent with the game, then you said that's all the good you can say about it. I don't know about other people, but generally, me enjoying the game and having fun are the highest praises I can give a game, so it seems really odd that you would say it's fun, but make that such a minor note. I really feel like you need to explain why "having fun" is such minor praise. You're right that the inventory system pausing the game doesn't allow for the same kind of horror that a live system does; however, that's exactly how it worked in the original four RE games. In fact, in RE2Remake it also pauses the game on the inventory screen and you never mention this. This doesn't excuse the fact that a live inventory is better, but it seems to me that the chose this to be faithful to the original rather than being regressive in design. Now, all that being said, I still think it's obvious that this game was rushed which is what led to its short runtime, but I also think it has a lot to do with the iriginal game being shorter as well. On average, looking at player driven stats, the original game and the remake have comprable play times in spite of the cut content. In the end, I personally loved RE3Remake and have zero regrets buying it (and I posted extra to get a scalped special edition) because it was immensly fun. I played it 3 times back to back because I enjoyed it so much. However, I hope Capcom takes some extra time with us remakes moving forward to ensure the get the polish and changes they deserve. While RE3R was great, it's clear it could have easily been even better with some additional dev time.
Really!? You're criticizing the game pausing when you open the menu? "It works in contrast to resident evil going back a decade." You know that pausing in a menu happens in the original RE 1, 2,3,4 and their respective remakes
Tbh I would've preferred this base game to just be sold for 40USD and forego the multiplayer mode. At 40 I think it would've been much easier to swallow for people.
How long was everyone's 1st playthrough of this short @ss game? Mine was just under 4 hours. When you take into account that includes exploration & trying to find collectables, that's bad
Talk about feeling guilty, how about Nemesis bursting through a wall just to stand there in a T-post? 😂😂😂 And proceeds to do so every time u encountered him. Also Cerberus and Drain Deimos were just standing there doing nothing, but not zombies for some reason, they would attack. Anyway, I had to restart the game to fix they problem.
I'm sure everyone will hate me for saying this, but I think RE7 is better than RE2 and 3 remake. The atmosphere and characters in 7 just seem better to me personally. Plus it's packed full of amazing DLC, that feels more like the older RE titles, while DLC for newer titles just seemed okay.
Wrong, the original had live selection, multiple ending, more puzzle, extra location etc. They cut content and forced shitty multiplayer and charged $60 for it.
Yes the devs were lazy with this game. What they really need to do is fix the game with dlc restoring all the old areas, live selection,Jill goes to the station, nemesis kills Brad and More nemisis encounters, nemisis never transforms till the very end, etc. If dlc were to fix the game i would have no problem paying extra. Ive waited for this game almost 20 years so i dont care if they charge for dlc.
The inventory system has always been like this what are you talking about? Have you played any of the other resident evil games? Every single one features limited inventory space and a pause feature for going into the inventory screen except for 5 and 6 and that was due to the multiplayer playing a part in the mechanics. So I’m just confused why this is a critique when it’s been a staple in a majority of the single player resident evil games. I’m not saying re3 was good by any means in fact it was as you said, a disappointment, but the inventory system not being intended this way? Again, it’s always been like this.
Imo whenever you're creating a remake you cannot do one of the cardinal sins., would be to cut content. If you want to add consent that's extra, that's fine as long as it's relevant to the story. You don't cut out entire sections of the game and expect people to be fine with it. common sense is not common enough In my opinion Capcom should try to fix the Resident Evil 3 remake. Until their fan base is happy. You can't just sell that and expect people be fine with that
The original Resident Evil 3 was short as well and also lazy. It’s literally the worst game from the original trilogy which cause the franchise to be shelved for until Resident Evil 1 Remake on GameCube 3 years later (a remake that was made to see if anyone was still interested in RE as a franchise). You might say what about CV, well CV was already in development since RE 2 and was originally slated for the Saturn.
Dude Resident Evil 1 2 3 & 4 all paused on the inventory screen......and that obviously includes the original. So that particular criticism actually shows that it's you who doesn't understand Resident Evil design, not the devs. So with all due respect, that's just not a fair criticism. Also every single Resident Evil game had intentional B movie horror acting and sequences. So again that's pretty much a staple in the design of the whole series, certainly nothing unique to this entry.... As for the door glitch, if it happens all the time then that sucks, but if it's just an outlier then it's pretty much on par with minor glitches found in all games I think. As for the length and multiplayer, yeah I completely agree with you there.
Really liked your videos for the past years, but the recent comments about gender make me icky. In the metro scene she's clearly trying to take Nemesis away from the survivors, as a cop would do. Didn't see the mu rah rah feminism you're talking about. Made the commentary about RE3 feel superficial for me, as the game itself.
Mu rah rah feminism is still over the top in this game Oh, a man just rescued me from a giant monster trying to kill me...i better act like an unsypathetic bitch than to simply thank him.
!['Resident Evil 4 Remake' Is Truly Remarkable [4K Review]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/ielm4MGZlTc/mqdefault.jpg)
!['Resident Evil 4 Remake' Is Truly Remarkable [4K Review]](/img/tr.png)
FOLLOW ME:
🐤 TWITTER: twitter.com/LukeStephensTV 🐤
📷 Instagram: instagram.com/lukestephenstv/ 📷
Were you trying to get a match in either survivor or mastermind?
Survivor matchmaking is very slow , never had the issue when I would play Mastermind
@Christopher Simon Re2 remake has cut content too
@Christopher Simon Remakes and remasters are too different things they're remaking which means it'll be different from the other game
Well I don't have any issues in the multiplayer so yeah every time i play it takes only like 3-6 min which is fine sometimes it is even faster.
Maybe ure just online at the wrong time or you are on a different Server cuz I m playing in the EU.
And Resident Evil 3 is not lazy.
8:48 - _combines two green herbs, while having a red herb in inventory_
Hmmm
green herbs best herbs
RE veteran here
If Resident Evil 4 and 5 taught me anything :
green + green = about 50% of total health restoration
green + red = full one hundred, just like as if you used a first aid spray
Consuming green+green combo is good, if your health is not in red zone (let's say if you have like 40 % of total health, and you use that G+G and then your total health is 90 %).
I'd rather keep green+red combo if I get messed up real bad and health is very low.
@@katytis2012 Still dude, he didn't have any other green herbs to mix with the red herb lol
How is Jill leading nemesis away from the train filled with survivors a stupid decision? Nemesis wants Jill and will kill everyone in her way, if she ran back to the train (which wasn't ready to go yet) nemesis would've killed all of them easily, a shutter isn't gonna stop him. I get that they died later anyway but her leading nemesis away was the smart decision because Nemesis was only interested in her, no one else.
Resident Evil 3 is rushed and stuff but her decisions aren't stupid considering she knows how to fight these monsters. This isn't her first game she's done her time being the survivor in resi 1 she's used to this zombie rodeo.
Pastafarian it’s stupid because as already shown literally within the first 2 minutes of the game, the plot allows basic things to stop Nemesis such as bookshelves tripped in front of doors - so a metal shutter would likely stop this tame version of Nemesis we got. Jill didn’t have to lead him away.
@@aguycalledpete he breaks walls
@@aguycalledpete i always kinda figured he was just toying with you. Giving you a false sense of security
So Jill facing Nemesis alone makes sense because, according to you, she somehow knows how to fight him, but Jill facing Nemesis with help from several Umbrella mercs means he would've "killed all of them easily"?
In the food chain of the game Stars members are supposed to be above zombies and Lickers by the time RE3 happens, so you're correct in saying that Jill knows what she's doing. But that is where Nemesis is supposed to come in and flip the hierarchy upside down. Which is precisely what he does in the original. He shows up out of nowhere and one-shots Brad and from then on it's established that he is the alpha predator in Raccoon City. And other characters including Jill act accordingly, meaning they're terrified of this seemingly unstoppable terminator-like monstrosity. Now you have a strong and oppressive horror setting and a terrifying almost invulnerable antagonist as a result.
R3make fucks this up absolutely. Nemesis never kills Brad and keeps failing constantly, and all of the other characters keep trash talking and insulting him. As a result horror is barely there and the antagonist is too weak to be taken seriously since no one else takes him seriously either.
Now if you want Jill to flip things back and take on Nemesis willingly you can do that later in the game. Once she's been through many encounters and actually knows what he is and what he is capable of, and once she's well equipped, and once a good enough reason is given. Then you can have that "I'll give you Stars" moment and have it mean something, unlike in R3make where they even fucked that up by mistiming it within the story.
So to conclude what Jill did was stupid. It was heroic and that is admirable, but it was stupid. She knows pretty much nothing about Nemesis by then, her gear is weak, she refuses help from heavily armed mercenaries, and she willing and blindly runs towards what should be the greatest and most dangerous threat she ever faced. It even makes her look incompetent since like you said, she survived the mansion and should know what a Tyrant is by now, so she should know better than to face one intentionally with nothing but a shotgun and a pistol.
@@aguycalledpete i don't know what game did you play then since nemesis chases her until the whole building collapses in the beginning sequence
As a certified notification squad member I gotta say keep it up man .
While I dont think it shouldnt have been priced at $60 I do feel like you just had a bad experience overall because I didnt get any glitches and the weapons/combat isnt that clunky, I liked the weapon system, it gave you enough ammo to get through section and it was up to how you used the different weapons to defeat the enemies. The inventory system was the same as RE2 remake, I it forced you to figure out what is important to keep while on the run. You definitely had some nitpicks in this because you complained about the inventory system which was the exact same as RE2 remake and the fact that the game pauses when in the inventory menu... like really?
Still a puddle of a game, no Mercenaries mode, no game altering decisions, no unique locations, and a dumbed down story which plays into tropes i.e big bad antagonist that does dumb shit
I love this channel, I do, but I fee like this is the worst commentary yet. I’m not going to defend RE3 for its flaws but Jill leading Nemesis away from the train makes sense. She knows the train will take time to get going. She’s a cop, not just a cop but a member of STARS. Listen, man, RE has always been over the top and cheesy. It’s part of the quirk. It’s really not as stupid as you make it seem.
I share your exact same opinion. When he said Jill’s decision was stupid, i was really confused. She was clearly doing it to save the others.
The game is still shit anyway
Doesn't the game also pause when you open the inventory in RE2make, and alot of the other mainline RE games?
The city, the police station, the whole buildup to the train escape, the train crash, the clock tower, the hospital, the park, the lab. The journey.
The ambiance, the music, the tension, the ammo shortage, the survival, the horror, the fear.
Yeah, I guess it was impossible to honor all these dumb things.
Daddy Stephens will spank this game's shortness real hard
Your profile pic fits perfectly with what you said heh
If you don't like the Resident Evil inventory system, why are you playing Resident Evil games? RE7's real time inventory is an anomaly with RE5 and 6. Every single other main RE game pauses while in inventory.
Yeah 1-4 ALL had the a pausing inventory including the original game so this criticism was incredibly whack
@@akumakurosawa i mean every RE game except for 7 had a time frozen inventory so it will just be a thing for purist to complain about.
@@akumakurosawa but i do think that it could also be a option for a live inventory
I think he means pausing the in-game timer specifically, not just the game. In all other RE games the in-game timer is still running even when you’re in the inventory and it effects your rating at the end. Adds more tension to your time management and decision making.
@@JC-cb8oi That's not what he was talking about at all. He said that in Resident evil games the action continues while you're sifting through your inventory in order to stress you out, and showed a comparison of re7 doing exactly that to prove his point. He said that's how Resident evil games are supposed to be, oblivious of the fact that that's basically the only one that operates that way. He said nothing about rankings or the game timer at all. It couldn't have been any more clear that he was talking about the action. He just got that one wrong plain and simple.
With a game like this there should have rarely been a safe moment. Nemesis should have been following you everywhere. His head poping out of sewers and mailboxes even .
😂😂
It's funny that FF7R is only a fraction of the original, yet has 10x more to offer than RE3R, that's how little effort they put into it.
FFVIIR should have had 15-20 hours of tedious content CUT from it in my opinion. Then I would probably consider replaying it...
Ok point, both totally different games, the originals will always be better, because we had the creators back then working 20hour days with dreams and not money, and we had the best creator writers in japan, this goes for resident evil 2 remake, it had a better team
Ati Islam its funny how ff7r is filled to the fucking brim with filler
More content is subjective. FF7 Remake had so much filler. It took too long to get to the great moments of that game. RE3 was infinitely more enjoyable even if it's only 5 hours long at best.
Yes compare a RPG to a survival horror game you’re a genius 🙄
"The game is clunky and unfun." Even though the gameplay exactly like RE2MAKE with the addition of a Dodge mechanic.
Minutes 7:45-9:00 Being shot in the face with a shotgun in real life would kill anybody, just like you can't pause any real life situation. WtF LMAO
I liked the game, but I do agree that it's pretty flawed. I never had an issue with Jill leading Nemesis away from the survivors though. Seemed like the correct choice given the circumstances. Like, the alternative was to lead Nemesis down to the train, with Carlos...and all the civilians. Her goals were to keep the civilians safe and give Carlos time to prepare the train. Neither of those thing could happen if Nemesis was down there with them. Leading him away was the only option, and I actually like the scene, it defines Jill as both clever and brave. But this isn't the first time I've seen a knee-jerk to this scene...perhaps the game doesn't do a good enough job at describing the stakes?
"It takes an idiot to do cool things. That's why it's cool."
0:04 Angry Joe: 4 HOOUUURRSSSS?!?!
I have to desagree with your opinion in that metro scene that it may sound stupid at first, but she is a cop. First i have to.say o agree with you, RE3 is Lazy, but i have to defend these scene, but i really enjoy you're Channel
That Said, It may be stupid that she tries to sacrifice herself, but she doesen't want nemesis to reach the survivors. She is awere that nemesis ia after her, but If she proceded at that moment at the train, everyone.would have died because of her. And that person is Jill for me:a cop. An hero.
Just my little opinion of course. RE3 sucks...but it's good...but It sucks hahahahahah
The moment at the 9:50 mark after Jill died from being stupid, this Corona Ad starts playing with this sad music as if in memorandum of Jill and I DIED 😭😭😭
That's really funny timing. Jill will live on in our hearts forever.
the problem isn't that it's short every RE game is short but that's why it has replay value to make up for it. RE3's problem is cut content and barely any replay value and nemesis is hardly in it
The Crow of Yharnam The biggest issues for me are that Nemesis isn't a consistent threat like Mr. X and certain areas should've been expanded upon, namely the clock tower and city streets.
I would've loved to see a semi-open city section where you explore for items and get through puzzles while Nemesis stalks you.
The real issue is cut content namely lacks of certain location and live selection. Secondly, those ridiculous price tag. No one will complaint if it was $30.
@@burgskeletal3149 those are RE3s demakes biggest problems, probs to you sir
The real issue isn't even the length... It's Nemesis and the removal of the clock tower.
@@ace4705 exactly. More issues are tons of reused assets, unsympathetic main character, toned down gore.
I am so glad you make this vlog Luke!
The problem is it was obviously being made at the same time as the RE2 remake and got the lazier team.
To be fair the 4 hours time was just the playtime. Complete time with cutscenes was shown on the right up corner. I think it was 6 hours..
Titanfall 2 campaign was what, 5 hours? love that campaign.. short games can be great, then again TF2 is more about MP
This is so true and your the first person I've heard address this, with certain games I understand not counting the cutscenes but the RE games not only are the cutscenes high quality but they are just super crucial to the story and experience, you are missing out on a huge part of the game I still rewatch them all if I replay the RE games And by skipping them your missing out on such a large portion of the games while a lot of other games I'd say you could get away with skipping every cut scene without missing out on much
Its funny how many people shit on RE3 remake for being so short, but so was the original and so was the RE2 remake. The RE2 remake can be easily beaten under 2 and a half hrs. Especially if you are going for S ranks. RE was neber about length but replays.
I can't help noticing that Nemesis is apparently trying not to kill Jill in all the cutscenes. Everyone around her is taken out within literal seconds, but Jill is given opportunities to get away every bloody time that it could have become it's own subplot.
The plot armor is real in this game 😂
This game could have been so much more that's the real sad thing here.
More doesn't always = better! :) I'm still having tons of fun, despite it's flaws.
@@garettstrath1152 you're right, I'm glad you're liking it, I just feel they had a chance to really expand on the original concept but they kind of just played it safe and simple which is kind of a bummer considering the other remakes are almost better than the originals
@@heartman64 I hope they don't fuck up RE4 Remake, that's my favorite one in the series and just hope they do it complete justice and don't leave anything out
@@yungsteezy dont get your hopes up, the devs who made RE3r is the one gonna make RE4r. The main team is busy with RE8.
@@yungsteezy couldn't care less about RE4
Since first off, they killed RE3, so i won't even be looking forward for RE4 R
RE3R and FF7R isn't a good comparison you're comparing an RPG which is expected to be dozens of hours long to a survival horror game which is supposed to short as that's how all RE games are the problems are cut content, barely any replay value and nemesis is barely in the game
The Crow of Yharnam finally someone gets it
Took me a dozen hours in single player. You must be a game god! Loved how action packed and visceral it was. Better than most action movies. I got it for $20. Well worth it.
Honestly I could.overlook most of this game's flaws(the abundance of ammo, short length etc) if it wasn't for 3 things:
1. Easily the biggest problem is that 90% of the time, NEMESIS IS NOT SCARY, HE IS A JOKE!
He can be taken out with a single grenade and he is only scary during the section of the game where he chases you around the downtown area and even that doesn't last for very long.
He is only scary all the way through on Nightmare and Inferno ,but by that point it doesn't matter, because the main game ruined the suprise factor and menace it should have.
2. This game puts more time and energy into pointless QTEs and baysplosions than actually giving us puzzles, the multiple choice system.... stuff that gave the original its identity
3. Last but not least, the cut content. R2MAKE cut some stuff as well, but at least it made up for it with bonus content and actually making a lot of improvements to what WAS in the game.
This game cut out entire sections from the game and replaced them with crappier versions or ,even worse, it teases you with them. You fight doggo Nemesis outside the clocktower but you don't actually go in there.
If they had cut out the crappy section thst were bad in the original to begin with, people wouldnn't complain, but this is just agregious.
didn't re3 only have about a year or so indevelopment while ff7 had a few more than 1 year under its belt.. I own both and love them both
2003 was a 5 hour campaign was fine. I played many short games countless times because it was fun. But today unfortunately it's not. I have not the motivation anymore to play it 4-5 times over
I really enjoyed RE3 so I don't agree with you fully. However, it was definitely a short game and I don't think the price value of £50 was justified for the "average" player. I got my money's worth out of it but I think I'm in the minority with that. Actually, let me say this: if RE2make wasn't so good and didn't get me hyped up then I doubt I would be so forgiving for RE3make. I didn't have any issue with the gameplay (even Carlos's RE4 style cabin mission didn't bother me). It's just there wasn't enough of it. Inferno mode was completed by me but it's a meme difficulty and Nemmy4 inferno is too hard on a PS4 controller and too easy with a keyboard and mouse. I didn't like how Nemmy basically turned into a dog. Why did they do this I wonder? He was a lot more intimidating when he's sprinting to slap the back of your head. Also, once you understand walking Nemmy he's ridiculously easy to avoid thanks to the placement of single-use exploding barrels and electrocution. Because the game is so short, it doesn't matter that the barrels are single-use because you only need to use them once. Electrocution followed by a grenade is enough to down nemmy as well. Once you understand this the fear factor is just gone.
j3s0n The biggest issues for me are that Nemesis isn't a consistent threat like Mr. X and certain areas should've been expanded upon, namely the clock tower and city streets.
I would've loved to see a semi-open city section where you explore for items and get through puzzles while Nemesis stalks you.
@@akumakurosawa He was perfect
Capcom: "We've got enough funding for 2 good RE-remakes, which ones we gonna do?"
Devs: "2 and 4, we can take 2 assets to make 3 with a multiplayer too, and test head tentacle tech for 4 and make nemesis more like saddler too"
9:20 For all the hate against "muh feminism" agendas, you decided to bring up that topic where it wasn't even warranted.
Where Jill immediately dies in the next linear sequence after that? That's on you because you were controlling her and couldn't dodge an attack. It's bad game design to make the next gameplay segment a tight hallway, sure, but that doesn't excuse you as a bad player yourself. Anyone and their mother could've survived that if they just decided to use a first aid item first.
(Spoilers Below)
Secondly, to make your argument sound valid, you glossed over how Jill got all people in the train killed later by being inside the train herself... because Nemesis chased her there. It's inferred that Nemesis relentlessly stalks her and would cause collateral damage to others if Jill had stayed in the subway. It's not mindblowing storytelling, but it's straightforward enough that it's more obtuse to extrapolate it as social commentary rather than taking it in face value as a simple plot device.
"sure, but that doesn't excuse you as a bad player yourself. "
but he wasn't talking about playing he was talking about how he felt jill making a bad decission. I don't think him dying had anything to do with his thoughts on that since he didn't say he was mad about dying he said that what jill did was a stupid decission so i don't know why you even bother mentioning that. I understand the rest tho but the excuse yourself as a bad player doesn't work since that was never what he got mad at. He didn't get annnoyed by dying.
I understand the spoiler part that makes sense but that other part doesn't really mean anything because that was never his point to begin with it was not him raging at him getting killed or something. So saying he could have survived that is kinda missing the point. There is no point to mention something that he didn't complain about.
maybe he wanted her to get to the train with nemesis chasing her and have all the civilians died necaise of it lol
Except Jill is intentionally trying to buy Carlos and the civilians time. She literally says that in the same exact clip, so she's not doing a "stupid decision." She's trying to be selfless because she knows Nemesis is after her, not them.
@@SpartanWolf222 And in the end it's all meaningless, as all of the civilians die regardless. Hurray.
@@bluemooninthedaylight8073 lol true. Since Nemesis follows her everywhere, she should have known better.
Then, after Nemesis kills the passengers, Jill tries to take on Nemesis with her bare hands, it seems. Lucky, Mikhail told her to leave
Capcom should have stayed more true to the Original Resident Evil 3 Nemesis!
I'm starting to believe that games that are naturally conceptually average are harder to make and often end in lazy products. It's the nature of how interested one could be in a concept type thing.
Yes, because not being able to find the healing item you need while in a boss fight because the game doesn't pause in the inventory is a great thing. That's not unfair or frustrating, that won't make me think "wow, that was bullshit, I had no time to even select the fucking thing, what the fuck were they thinking?", just as it was in every single fucking Resident Evil game that didn't pause while you were in the inventory.
Resident Evil is... was about making strategic decisions, not about being a Call of Duty game. The combat was more of a puzzle than a real combat, that's why you had limited resources, that's why you would die in just a few hits and had no health regeneration. You didn't need quick reflexes to get good at the games, you had to be smart and plan out everything correctly. Having all your strategy and plans be ruined because oh whoopsies you didn't move your cursor quick enough! just makes for an crappy experience.
Luke be consuming every horror type of entertainment in existence 😂
Laziness is one thing but charging 60$ for that is complete and utter HERESY!
How did they go from resi 7 to this?
My biggest gripe with this game, aside from the short playtime, is how they managed to make Jill SO unlikeable.... It was a far cry from the Jill I have loved since RE:1. Damn shame.
Thank feminism agendas for that
I played it last night, great remake. Sit down at night, lights off.. enjoy the cut scenes & play it 1st time with the unknown it was enjoyable
Resident Evil 3 remake managed to have the same issues as the original resident evil 3 😂
There is no RE3 remake.
Nah man, RE3 Demake actually took all the issues of the original and super sized them.
@@giovannigiovanni.7220 Exactly
5:02 And here we can see the schrodinger glich as the game is strugling to create an entire diferent universe where Nemesis kills Jill
I loved this game and I think its great. It is disappointing they cut out so many parts. If they had just kept the clock tower in them with a few more hours of nemesis chasing you then most people would have been satisfied. But the game is still really good. Just not a good remake. Hopefully they add mercenaries mode in a free update at least
Wish they focused more on RE3 remake instead of Resistance...
9:25 Respect Luke, cant wait for the TLOU2 review lmao.
Hey dude I just subscribed to you after watching your last of us leak video.i appreciate you turning your comments off as I still don’t know the leak and am trying to keep it that way until launch just wanted you to know that whoever ruined it for you has failed in a way because it has got you at least one more sub keep up the good work work I enjoy watching the vids👍
Dude, do not mention the leak, in fact, delete this thread or at least remove the mention of the leak.
Seriously, I know the leak and I know how tempting it is to shout it everywhere I go.
I played the demo and hated the fact you can do multiple head shots and they just keep shuffling towards you. Walking around didn't feel smooth either.
I'm an avid follower, but I never got a notification until today, THANK YOU for everything you do.
P.s. What's your thoughts on Persona 5 royal?
This game should've been another 1-2hrs atleast. With more exploration, puzzles and nemisis forms. It's a shame honestly. Resistance should been delayed until the fall and been a Outbreak remake akin to L4D and WWZ..
I’m really glad I got 2 and 3 for $20 on sale and I just got 7 and 8 on sale and I’m like nah these are good but I would not have paid $60 at launch 🚀
Completely agree. I am from the UK and game is £50 and I don't think it's worth that. I am enjoying the game but compared to resident evil 2 remake does feel like it's coasted of the success of that game
I agree. It’s should be at least 30$ max.
I loved the game and it actually got me more into resident evil so I’m fine with it’s length because I put more time in by doing speed runs and I had so much fun with it.
The Resistance side mode/game is actually coming around to being a good distraction/extra content but definitely not what fans wanted. When it comes to Resistance it's best to play with a group, I've done lots of solo and group quick play, and group play is definitely the way to play and dramatically improves matchmaking
Mastermind Matchmaking is a lot faster than Surivor matchmaking
Might take 2-5 minutes but usually mastermind is a lot faster, for me Survivor matchmaking is very slow
I love what you did there ;) 9:33
I think I’m the only person who thinks r3make is more fun than last years RE2make
Yeah it’s actually more fun
I prefer 3 too. I think a lot of people are jumping on the bandwagon of hate at this point
Love your content Luke
There is one thing I hated about this game, which is the fact that they completely remove the RPD area with Jill. When playing RE2 there are some real structural damages to the walls - like the made entrance where you get the first emblem key - the very first time I played that I thought... well... Nemesis went through here. Yet this part is totally omitted and if you ho to 3rd floor as Carlos... well the wall is scracthless! Something does not adds up....
fun game, nemesis is fucking cool, freakishly great graphics yet it does has a crappy story
Does the RE2 remake pause the action in the inventory screen, too? They are both very similar game-engine-wise...
There is no RE2 remake.
@@giovannigiovanni.7220 are you trying to be funny?
It looks more like a "in between" release than a main tittle. Any data that might support this theory?
I mean they cut the clock tower and other stuff.
To me this seems like a case of this being made right after re 2 was done
@@f10pped36 thats the case with in-between releases, they are usually given a lower development time and budget, made to fill the gap between main tittle games with the intention of retaining audiences, having a steady number of releases, cash in the residual value that fans are eager to pay after a great succes and a whole bunch of other reasons that may be involved.
I didn’t know about you, I played the game on hardcore and I enjoyed every second of it, took me 7 hours and half. If you were a resident evil die hard fan you would’ve played it on hardcore instead of standard
More like "toxic RE fan", not everyone plays these games for bragging rights
charging $60 should not be mandatory for such a short game, this is more like a $35 game.
Thata why I'm waiting for a price drop for this one, no way I'm paying 60$ for a 4 hour game. Its such a shame to because resident evil 2 remake was one of my favorite games last year.
Re7 is about the same length, beat it within 4 hrs 30 mins first try
And went in completely blind when I first played it
On normal mind you
@@foxhoundbridges4851 to be honest i wouldn't recommend buying it at all, we can't reward game companies over charging anymore
The better part of 3 years was spent on this remake. There were extensive models and live action stunt work, with tons of work put into the story, voice lines and motion capture. It’s one of the best looking games of the generation. You can say whatever you want about the game’s design. But calling it lazy is very disrespectful and not true.
That’s the problem. It just looks good. Almost everything else is crap. Eye candy for that sweet cash money
Well that’s your opinion. I happen to love the game. I have over 40 hours just in the campaign. People like you think your opinion is he ultimate truth and the only one that matters. Last time I checked the game even had an 80 on metacritic. And it’s sold 2.5 mil.
Agreed. The characters, story and gameplay are all better in 3. Hell theres actually a soundtrack this time too. I love 2 but 3 improves on it a lot, theres a lot of replayability with the higher difficulties and shop. Calling its lazy its stupid.
I can agree fairly with the Lazy statement, it is, would be a almost perfect remake (for me) if they gave some love to iconic locations like clock tower and try to pull the live selection at some points with hopefully some alternate endings.
Nightmare mode should be more easilly acessible since it adds a lot of fun with a new loadout of enemies and spawn location also the addiction of a randomizer mode would be cool too.
We get the feel of love from some things, the character models and performance are amazing, city and music too, but it feel rushed.
But man the critique on the Jill's choices are so out of place, RE pull this move since start waaay before Anita stuff
Meh.. I enjoyed it, definitely not as good as 2 but i still enjoyed it.
its still terrible
black chase67 Yes we get it he’s just stating his opinion stop forcing yours down his throat 🙄
It was worth borrowing from a friend. Otherwise I would have been so pissed if I bought it.
I just got the platinum for this game today. Still don’t enjoy the game at all.
You serious?
Thoughts on mafia trilogy remaster?
Mafia 2 still holds up today & doesn’t really need a remake. Mafia 3 on the other hand is the most repetitive, steaming piles of 💩games released in the last decade. It’s honestly the most disappointing game especially compared to how great 2 as a game was received so I’d definitely be all for a Mafia 3 remake no doubt about it
Im callin it now they’re unfortunately going to cut stuff out of re4 remake. Re4 was a massive compared to the games that came before it. Plus the inventory system was different in a way. & plus you had the treasures that you could buy & sell so how is that aspect going to work? Are they goin to get rid of the treasure all the way or is there goin to be a separate think for the treasure?
& i know in the re4 the treasure was separated from the other items when it came to storage. But the m2 studio is probably goin to be lazy & cut it out.
Y'know, I've heard countless TH-camrs say this, when talking about Resident Evil games. Specifically, when critiquing or reviewing one. @6:09 "[...]Clunky inventory
[...]Designed to make you feel uncomfortable" Has this been actually confirmed or said from a Resident Evil developer, or even anyone at capcom? I'm fully just curious. I've never once felt like any of the RE games, but ESPECIALLY the newer ones starting with RE7 and onward, RE2make and RE3make, had a clunky inventory to make me feel "uncomfortable"
I don't mean to put you on blas, or something like that, Luke. JUST Curious, as you're like the 100th person to mention it
Resident evil games has always had similar type of inventory system since the beginning
Luke I like your stuff but this review was lazy.
This was my first RE game and i absolutely loved it, Ive played through it 7 times and i think the shop as well as the higher difficulties really make the game more replayable than 2. Jill isn't feministy at all and its actually refreshing. The gameplay is clunky? Its got some of the smoothest gameplay ive ever played.
Completely agree, they blow all the effort and money on the ''cinematic'' stuff like the first person intro in Jill's apartment, while the actual game design and assets takes a back seat, most things are either directly recycled from RE2 or completely scrapped from the original game.
But for some reason, even though I hated the game for the same reasons you stated and also because the game was so short and re-used assets from RE7 and 2 Remake... I'll still HAVE to buy the next RE game capcom puts out because I've been involved in this franchise for pretty much my entire life, since I was 8. I'm shackled, hjelp
anyone know what the title to the outro track is?
The 4 hour and 2 minute completion time was the gameplay minus cutscenes. If you look up to the right you'd see your total game time. But yeah the game felt lacking.
we all know that and that is the point
My main reproach is capcom cut off too much content / locations from the original.
I don't want to convince you that the gave is a master piece or that it doesn't have any issues, but I do want to add some counter points to the discussion.
First, I didn't even download the multiplayer, I have zero interest in it. I only played the main campaign, and I never played the original. I played every original RE game minus 3.
With all that in mind I have to say that the two biggest issues I have with your critique is: what you said about it being fun, the inventory system.
Toy said it's fun, you enjoyed the time you spent with the game, then you said that's all the good you can say about it. I don't know about other people, but generally, me enjoying the game and having fun are the highest praises I can give a game, so it seems really odd that you would say it's fun, but make that such a minor note.
I really feel like you need to explain why "having fun" is such minor praise.
You're right that the inventory system pausing the game doesn't allow for the same kind of horror that a live system does; however, that's exactly how it worked in the original four RE games. In fact, in RE2Remake it also pauses the game on the inventory screen and you never mention this.
This doesn't excuse the fact that a live inventory is better, but it seems to me that the chose this to be faithful to the original rather than being regressive in design.
Now, all that being said, I still think it's obvious that this game was rushed which is what led to its short runtime, but I also think it has a lot to do with the iriginal game being shorter as well. On average, looking at player driven stats, the original game and the remake have comprable play times in spite of the cut content.
In the end, I personally loved RE3Remake and have zero regrets buying it (and I posted extra to get a scalped special edition) because it was immensly fun. I played it 3 times back to back because I enjoyed it so much. However, I hope Capcom takes some extra time with us remakes moving forward to ensure the get the polish and changes they deserve. While RE3R was great, it's clear it could have easily been even better with some additional dev time.
Really!? You're criticizing the game pausing when you open the menu? "It works in contrast to resident evil going back a decade." You know that pausing in a menu happens in the original RE 1, 2,3,4 and their respective remakes
Tbh I would've preferred this base game to just be sold for 40USD and forego the multiplayer mode. At 40 I think it would've been much easier to swallow for people.
How long was everyone's 1st playthrough of this short @ss game? Mine was just under 4 hours. When you take into account that includes exploration & trying to find collectables, that's bad
Talk about feeling guilty, how about Nemesis bursting through a wall just to stand there in a T-post? 😂😂😂 And proceeds to do so every time u encountered him. Also Cerberus and Drain Deimos were just standing there doing nothing, but not zombies for some reason, they would attack. Anyway, I had to restart the game to fix they problem.
Mnmn how can you say that the gameplay was bad since its very very similiar to the Re2remake one? ( also even better for me because of the dodge)
I'm sure everyone will hate me for saying this, but I think RE7 is better than RE2 and 3 remake. The atmosphere and characters in 7 just seem better to me personally. Plus it's packed full of amazing DLC, that feels more like the older RE titles, while DLC for newer titles just seemed okay.
Still haven't played it, saw the ad and teasers, hmmd and huhd it. I was right so far, playing on the fans expense, I'll wait till it becomes cheaper.
I find it funny that reviewers are talking of a Remake without a proper understanding of what the original is.
I mean that's what it looks like ....
Wrong, the original had live selection, multiple ending, more puzzle, extra location etc. They cut content and forced shitty multiplayer and charged $60 for it.
@@zerenadli exactly. Plus made the main character unsypathetic and turned the franchises most famous and relentless enemy into a hectic joke.
Frustrating and difficult to use? The item menu is fine dude.
Yes the devs were lazy with this game. What they really need to do is fix the game with dlc restoring all the old areas, live selection,Jill goes to the station, nemesis kills Brad and More nemisis encounters, nemisis never transforms till the very end, etc. If dlc were to fix the game i would have no problem paying extra. Ive waited for this game almost 20 years so i dont care if they charge for dlc.
The inventory system has always been like this what are you talking about? Have you played any of the other resident evil games? Every single one features limited inventory space and a pause feature for going into the inventory screen except for 5 and 6 and that was due to the multiplayer playing a part in the mechanics. So I’m just confused why this is a critique when it’s been a staple in a majority of the single player resident evil games. I’m not saying re3 was good by any means in fact it was as you said, a disappointment, but the inventory system not being intended this way? Again, it’s always been like this.
Imo whenever you're creating a remake you cannot do one of the cardinal sins., would be to cut content. If you want to add consent that's extra, that's fine as long as it's relevant to the story. You don't cut out entire sections of the game and expect people to be fine with it.
common sense is not common enough
In my opinion Capcom should try to fix the Resident Evil 3 remake. Until their fan base is happy. You can't just sell that and expect people be fine with that
Trinston was here. .
I beat it in one night and deleted it the day after. Waste of 60 bucks.
Well spent 60 bucks*
The original Resident Evil 3 was short as well and also lazy. It’s literally the worst game from the original trilogy which cause the franchise to be shelved for until Resident Evil 1 Remake on GameCube 3 years later (a remake that was made to see if anyone was still interested in RE as a franchise). You might say what about CV, well CV was already in development since RE 2 and was originally slated for the Saturn.
it´s the same gameplay as RE2, so is RE2 bad?
Dude Resident Evil 1 2 3 & 4 all paused on the inventory screen......and that obviously includes the original. So that particular criticism actually shows that it's you who doesn't understand Resident Evil design, not the devs. So with all due respect, that's just not a fair criticism.
Also every single Resident Evil game had intentional B movie horror acting and sequences. So again that's pretty much a staple in the design of the whole series, certainly nothing unique to this entry....
As for the door glitch, if it happens all the time then that sucks, but if it's just an outlier then it's pretty much on par with minor glitches found in all games I think.
As for the length and multiplayer, yeah I completely agree with you there.
Why did you review RE 3 and RE 7 and ignore RE 2?
I'm scared just knowing that inside the mind of Jake Paul exists.
It's Just... Clickbait
Really liked your videos for the past years, but the recent comments about gender make me icky. In the metro scene she's clearly trying to take Nemesis away from the survivors, as a cop would do. Didn't see the mu rah rah feminism you're talking about. Made the commentary about RE3 feel superficial for me, as the game itself.
Mu rah rah feminism is still over the top in this game
Oh, a man just rescued me from a giant monster trying to kill me...i better act like an unsypathetic bitch than to simply thank him.
One glitch and it’s a BIG deal for him ughhhhh