Truly appreciate you watching the videos! Cinder blocks with these two power houses!!! New Merch available - bit.ly/2W68Gqp Heavy Metal here: bit.ly/30wF6wW Support us on Patreon www.patreon.com/whoteewho
Many years ago I bought my 7mm Rem Mag then researched ballistics. In my Speer book the only rifle to outperform the 7 for range and drop was the 300. I would guess today the modern calibers may do better but only bigger magnums. Nice video. Love my 7s . I also had a 7mm WSM and 7mm08. Like 'em all.
I have shot deer broadside through the ribs at 25-35 yards with a 7mm Mag and the bullet, save perhaps some small fragments, did not exit. Makes entry holes big enough to put your hand in, although the shattered ribs tend to be sharp. At several hundred yards, perhaps 600-800, it will blow right through and exit. Kills them all the same, but velocity and bullet design really determines what happens on impact.
Ian McSweet the second the bullet leaves the barrel it looses velocity. It’s impossible for the bullet to have any where near the velocity at 600 yards that it has at the muzzle. Muzzle velocity is always the fastest. That being said. Bullets can perform better at lower velocity vs higher. But not usually at 600-700 yards. They can perform better at 150 yards vs 30 yards
I live in the mountains and have absolutely no purpose for the 700 but its so fun to shoot! I remember being 16 and free handing this rifle and being slightly with the kick. And with the 300 i remember shooting a bottle cap off a bottle at 100 yds. So many good memories
Its probably been said before but bullet choice makes a big difference. Barnes Triple Shocks, X-bullets, Nosler partitions, or other solid/semi solid bullets would have resulted in greater penetration.
Yeah, but if you're shooting a 120-160 pound white tail, thats exactly the kind of explosive energy you want, without excessive penetration. If it was a 600Lbs feral hog with 5" tusks, THEN you want those solids.
7mm 4 walls , I own a Sako, in 7mm , friend of my fathers brought in back from Finland on his way home from Vietnam in 1969 , I got it when my dad passed , it will get out there , and hit hard ,your videos are awesome
We're so lucky to have so many good choices for ammo. My favorite has always been .308 and probably always will be. I'm pretty stubborn though and rarely attempt to adapt to new tech
@@MattP-BandB Pretty sure he was a subscriber of mine. He won't be if he comments in the future. He's not worth digging up an old comment to block him from my channel.
@@WHOTEEWHO back in the day, you could get about any kind of round for these calibers, and while it was all kind of expensive for my limited budget back then, none of it was a lot more than any other. I guess these rounds aren't as common as they used to be, everyone is into the 5.62 and such these days
Try these two and the 270 if you can against that half inch steel. I always go back to that video to see the impressive holes the 338 and 50bmg made, im sure these smaller but still high velocity rounds could put some decent little dents into it.
My 7mm mag I built on a heavy 300 win mag sniper stock is the best gun for my needs, the 7s feed in the 300 magazines perfectly, it's light recoil and flat shooting.
The north American cinder block, and its cousin the concrete block are usually found in more urban areas, making hunting them a challenge. Rarely seen in their natural state, they prefer to camouflage themselves with different color and textures, blending in with their surroundings, making them very elusive. With less meat on them than rats, they seem to be hunted for their more nuisance and destructive nature. Good hunting.
7mmRM, flatter, farther, more accurate. 300WinMag, just has a little more oomph at the extended ranges for bigger and thicker skinned game. Depends on what your target is.
I 've had all my money on the7mm Mag. I almost bought on in 1986. My Dad talked me out of it in favor of the .270. I still have that rifle today! Dear ole' Dad was right, as always.
my dad bought a parker-hale 7mm rem mag when I was born, 1967. I inherited that rifle when I was old enough to hunt, and it's still my go-to gun for everything I hunt.
I had a 270 and liked it but got a 7mm cuz I plan to one day go elk hunting and not dissing the 270 but it AINT a elk cartridge no matter how many jack o connor shot with it. Never saw a cartridge put down deer and elk sized game better than my 7 mag.Every one I have heard talk elk calibers always brings up the great 7 mag for its ability to put em down fast .
@@WHOTEEWHO normally, if you want to see which caliber penetrates the best, (has more energy) use FMJ. An expanding bullet will not keep penetrating. A fmj .308 will penetrate more than an expanding. 338wm. It makes no sense making penetration video on concrete blocks with expanding bullets 🤷♂️
No, you more than likely would not have similar results. The 150 grains .30 caliber has a lower sectional density than the same weight bullet in 7mm and less ability to penetrate and retain its weight. The test conducted in this video is accurate in the sense that it compares "apples to apples". Similar bullets sharing the same form factor in different calibers.
I just wanna know why you wouldn’t use the tried and true best hunting round for 7mm rem mag at 160 grain? I haven’t watched the results but and extra 30 grains is pretty unfair. I have noticed this in a couple other videos on other rounds too. Why not use as close as you can comparable ammo? Oh and if you didn’t notice, I chose a 7mm over the win mag a long time ago.
Just got a Smith and Wesson Model 1500 in 300 win mag. Havent got to shoot it yet. Looking forward to feeling that recoil and seeing how accurate she is!
I'm buying a Remington 700 7mm, this is an interesting video. I'd like to see the comparison at longer range, I keep hearing the 300 mag is the better round for distance and penetration
@@WHOTEEWHO I have watched a couple and I will be watching more. I'm very impressed with both guns. I'm buying the 7mm for an all around big game rifle. I want 1 gun for deer and elk, I live in Indiana so I can't really go any bigger for deer hunting because of our laws here. I don't think I need to go bigger anyway, I watched a video of a guy killing a mountain goat, 760 yards with a 7mm mag. Hell of a shot!
First let me thank you for posting these comparisons, it is helpful if you are considering either or both of these platforms. If you are comparing them: 1) both 7mm and 300 bullets should be the same weight. 2) different brands should also be compared. 3) hunting rounds are not meant to penetrate, you should use equal grain, full metal jacket. 4) measuring the energy on impact would be more informative. 5) measuring at say 100yd, 200yd, maybe 500 yd, would be interesting. 👍👍,Thanks
A friend of mine had a British 303 for many years and he always used Winchester Power Points and those rounds flat put the deer down. And i mean straight down to the ground no tracking them at all.
The .303 has 95% of the power of the .308 Winchester, so it is no slouch as a cartridge for medium game such as white-tail deer. It's probably a bit light for the largest and most-dangerous game in North America, such as the largest moose, elk or brown/grizzly bear. Most game guides in Alaska wouldn't hunt those with anything smaller than a 30-06, and most want something with even more thump than that, such as a 300 WM, 300 H&H, 338 Win-Mag, or even 375 H&H. Don't get me wrong - a rifle in .303 is certainly better than nothing even with the biggest and most-dangerous game, but shot-placement had better be good. A wounded and badly-ticked off bear can ruin your day...
I've shot both of these rounds and the 7RM is much easier on the shoulder. That being said, on a Whitetail at under 400yds, a 130g 270Win is a better choice... But if you're out to bag a trophy cinder block, I'd recommend the 7RM!
I think they’ll do about the same, seems like most rifle bullets just i’m a try through two walls and crack the third one even a 530gr solid brass bullet will barely penetrate 4 walls out of my 50 caliber lever action
try it w/ a water jug in the 2nd space bet that 3rd wall fractured w/o contact -- just from the other 2 breaking and it being connected by the thick sides
Hey buddy see if ya can find a railroad plate ta shoot they are interesting because they are tapered from half inch to 3/4 of an inch thick and there free and make a neat sound when hit. Also they come with holes for chain hangers built in.
I have had a 7mm Magnum for over forty years, Browning BBR and have never lost a deer a hit is a quick kill usually they drop where they are shot only one deer has ever ran after being hit and he was 260 lb live weight a monster 12 pointer took both lungs and his heart at 200 yards with a154 grain Hornady bullet hand load about 3000fps.
Iv own both shot several deer with both but in my personal opinion the 7 mag put the deer iv killed down faster than the 300 mag just my opinion but iv killed hundreds of deer because of land owners putting me on permits to kill deer off crops that were getting badly damage and having to take long shots I recovered much more deer with out having to get my dog with the 7 mag then I did with the 300 mag sold the 300 kept the 7 mag
@@calvinlayport3127 I feel the same. Last 5 deer I have shot and 3 elk all with 7mm rem mag. All deer were dead before hit the ground and all the elk took not even 10 steps. And died. 1 bull I had to shoot twice but he was dead anyway. Just wanted to keep him close lol
Both rounds are serious large game options for North America & most game on the planet. My choice has been 7mm over the years. I intend to get the Savage High Country in 7mm magnum in a few months.
I am about to buy myself a new deer hunting rifle. I hunt in mid Michigan. On the fence about which one to get. Starting to lean towards the 7MM. Any suggestions!my longest shot is 300 yards. I have a few other rifles.
Winchester SuperX for 7mmMag comes in 175 gr. That would have been better. Plus the strength of the 7mmMag is 160-180 grain. 150gr is under sized for the 7mmMag.
@@BamaShinesDistillery The mass of the bullet affects the SD which affects the BC. So for better performance in the 2nd half of a bulllet's range, it's better to use somewhat heavier bullets. That small of bullet would be effective in 0.243-0.270 depending on the intended range. But if someone inherited a bigger rifle and down sizes the cartridge to match the environment, then the simple academics aren't the only answer.
In this and some other videos the rifle barrels are angled down. Thus the projectile isn’t contacting the block straight on reducing energy transfer it also deflects the bullet. I expect these differences to be relatively small but sometimes small things make big differences. Try hitting a golf ball straight. Nonetheless, I enjoy the comparison of different ammunition.
That’s not apparent in the video, the blocks themselves look horizontal or are they parallel to the ground. Sorry for the Ramblings of an old engineer.
The video (even slow-mo) does NOT clearly show that three walls were penetrated - the dust obscures what actually happens. My point is, both bullets probably penetrated the first two walls, but due to the shock-wave induced into the block itself at the 1st and 2nd wall penetration events, the shock wave traveling faster than the remnant of the bullet, coupled with the relaxed strength of the block (now damaged; less structural integrity) is probably what finished splitting the blocks in half, i.e., the third wall. To prove one way or the other, conduct the experiment again this time without the 4th block, and place a camera over/above the 3rd wall so as to witness an actual impact event by the bullet (versus spawl from wall #2, or shock induced fracture as I surmise). Still, a great demonstration of the power of both cartridges!
Were the bullets exactly the same, some bullet designs are better for penetration and some for expansion. What counts more in kill power would be how much energy in foot pounds of impact do these rounds have at 100 yards out to 500 yards. Of course without good shot placement penetration does not matter that much.
300 win with a 200 grain nosler partitions going 2900 fps is more devastating than anything the 7mm magnum can do. I have both calibers and 160 grain or 175 grain out of a 7mm mag are great at getting the job done, but my 300 win with those bullets does it better at all ranges. I would much rather have my 300 win in the Yukon backcountry where certain critters think a rifle shot is a dinner bell. Not saying the 7mm could not protect me, however I would rather have that heavy 30 with me.
About what I was thinking. For 7mm do to 150gr bullet. And being a soft point. Wondering what the 338 win mag would do with 220gr load. Been know tear deer up.
@@WHOTEEWHO definitely. My dad ran 338 win for year. It's a cannon when it gos off. Here from pretty faraway when he would hammer a deer. But 338 win been know be the out west or Alaska go to gun.
300 win mag, you won’t find a better squirrel 🐿 round. Just don’t expect to find any part of it. 7mm, you may find small remnants, great video as always!
![7MM Mag vs 300 Win Mag [Which is Better???]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/NTSQUD5nVZg/mqdefault.jpg)
![7MM Mag vs 300 Win Mag [Which is Better???]](/img/tr.png)
Truly appreciate you watching the videos!
Cinder blocks with these two power houses!!!
New Merch available - bit.ly/2W68Gqp
Heavy Metal here: bit.ly/30wF6wW
Support us on Patreon www.patreon.com/whoteewho
Really nice to see that you used the same brand and type of ammunition for both cartridges, keeping the testing very accurate. Thank you
Thanks for watching!
Many years ago I bought my 7mm Rem Mag then researched ballistics. In my Speer book the only rifle to outperform the 7 for range and drop was the 300. I would guess today the modern calibers may do better but only bigger magnums. Nice video. Love my 7s . I also had a 7mm WSM and 7mm08. Like 'em all.
Thanks for watching Wayne! I love the 7mm!
If you want to see both guns penetrate more blocks, move away about 150 yards. The bullets at close range are exploding with no penetration.
I have shot deer broadside through the ribs at 25-35 yards with a 7mm Mag and the bullet, save perhaps some small fragments, did not exit. Makes entry holes big enough to put your hand in, although the shattered ribs tend to be sharp. At several hundred yards, perhaps 600-800, it will blow right through and exit. Kills them all the same, but velocity and bullet design really determines what happens on impact.
G53X0Y0Z0 and you’ll have a lot more velocity at 600-800 yds than at 30.
Are you guys stupid? Velocity is lost over distance, not the other way around
Ian McSweet the second the bullet leaves the barrel it looses velocity. It’s impossible for the bullet to have any where near the velocity at 600 yards that it has at the muzzle. Muzzle velocity is always the fastest. That being said. Bullets can perform better at lower velocity vs higher. But not usually at 600-700 yards. They can perform better at 150 yards vs 30 yards
Or just use something other than lead
Love my 7mm Rem Mag for those long range, open country, muley hunts!
no kidding they are legit
I live in the mountains and have absolutely no purpose for the 700 but its so fun to shoot! I remember being 16 and free handing this rifle and being slightly with the kick. And with the 300 i remember shooting a bottle cap off a bottle at 100 yds. So many good memories
Hey hate to be a disruptive, but I’m a kid and dose that gun kick hard
@@treypizzy2984 not to bad
Thanks @Keith adams
Exactly what I thought would happen. I told myself at the beginning 3 would be the maximum as theses soft tipped bullets aren't meant for penetration
I agree, not at that close range and on that hard medium.
Its probably been said before but bullet choice makes a big difference. Barnes Triple Shocks, X-bullets, Nosler partitions, or other solid/semi solid bullets would have resulted in greater penetration.
Yeah, but if you're shooting a 120-160 pound white tail, thats exactly the kind of explosive energy you want, without excessive penetration. If it was a 600Lbs feral hog with 5" tusks, THEN you want those solids.
7mm 4 walls , I own a Sako, in 7mm , friend of my fathers brought in back from Finland on his way home from Vietnam in 1969 , I got it when my dad passed , it will get out there , and hit hard ,your videos are awesome
Thanks for watching Robert!
Thanks who tee who i have 7 mm and 300 win mag i loved
You would definitely get better results at a lil more distance id move it to 100 for a start .
Still was a very interesting vid ,good job buddy .
We're so lucky to have so many good choices for ammo. My favorite has always been .308 and probably always will be. I'm pretty stubborn though and rarely attempt to adapt to new tech
If I could only have one rifle I would pick 308
30-06 u can find ammo everywhere, best all-around caliber
Yep i have a couple different rifles chambered in 308 and 1 in 308 Norma mag on a sporter stock absolutely love em all .
Todd Mustafa Ali I have a 30-06 and I love it. Best all around caliber. Even my mom and pop shop has 30-06 rounds.
7mm mag is possibly the most practical form of ammunition ever designed. Poplar with hunters and Snipers, alike. That tells you all you need to know.
Love my 7mm magnum
Well US Army used 300 WinMag nod 7 Mag
You misspelled .300 win mag
I wish I caught this live but it's great to watch it
Thanks for watching Rob!
Definitely worth watching....I was waiting for a video like this :)
Thanks for watching Joshua!
Very tempted to go do this to the house they're building entirely too closely to me. 😁
🤣🤣🤣
@Carlos Villa So, I made a joking comment and you flew in with a wish of bodily harm. Way to show your IQ. Keep on keeping on, my friend.
@Yuck Foutube I'll just tell them that they're right up close to a man that shoots a lot. Literally, don't have to say a word.
@@PatRMG Well played Sir. I'm not sure...ok, I'm positive I would not have responded as diplomatically.
@@MattP-BandB Pretty sure he was a subscriber of mine. He won't be if he comments in the future. He's not worth digging up an old comment to block him from my channel.
Exploding cinder blocks is always fun
I agree 🤣
Thank you for posting such videos as this, cant wait for another one 7mag vs 300 mag or 308 vs 7mm08..
Thanks for watching!!!
@@WHOTEEWHO You welcome
Love my REM 7mm with federal premium ballistic tips
frankly, I thought they would do more. I guess they impart their energy quickly, and that's good in a hunting round. Wonder what fmj's will do.
Hard to find fmj for these and if you do they are crazy expensive
@@WHOTEEWHO back in the day, you could get about any kind of round for these calibers, and while it was all kind of expensive for my limited budget back then, none of it was a lot more than any other. I guess these rounds aren't as common as they used to be, everyone is into the 5.62 and such these days
@@tootall5559
Hunting rounds are made to dump their energy like that. Especially lead tips like that winchester and Remington core lokts
@@jimmieburleigh9549 they always said that, but frankly I really didn't believe it.
I just automatically don't believe what the ads say.
Of all your videos the cinder blocks are my favorite. Great video
Thanks for watching Daniel!
Try these two and the 270 if you can against that half inch steel. I always go back to that video to see the impressive holes the 338 and 50bmg made, im sure these smaller but still high velocity rounds could put some decent little dents into it.
My 7mm mag I built on a heavy 300 win mag sniper stock is the best gun for my needs, the 7s feed in the 300 magazines perfectly, it's light recoil and flat shooting.
Great test if I ever want to start hunting cinder blocks
😜😜😜
The north American cinder block, and its cousin the concrete block are usually found in more urban areas, making hunting them a challenge. Rarely seen in their natural state, they prefer to camouflage themselves with different color and textures, blending in with their surroundings, making them very elusive. With less meat on them than rats, they seem to be hunted for their more nuisance and destructive nature. Good hunting.
7mmRM, flatter, farther, more accurate. 300WinMag, just has a little more oomph at the extended ranges for bigger and thicker skinned game. Depends on what your target is.
💪💪
pigs
The paper plates are going to be really cool! New respect for the 7mm mag.
👍👍
both calibers are great and almost the same but thas just my take on it
Sweet can’t wait for the jug test ... in advance 7mm 4 jugs 300 3 jugs but maybe both three jugs both have lots of velocity dumping
I like all your videos, but this kind is my favorite, thanks WTW!
Thanks for watching Sgt. ARMOR!!!
Thanks again for all the great videos.
Thanks again for watching Joel!
Custom loads is the only way to go!! 7mag
How do you load your rounds? Are you using heavier rounds
At 3:11 you can see the 7mm over the last block.
I 've had all my money on the7mm Mag. I almost bought on in 1986. My Dad talked me out of it in favor of the .270. I still have that rifle today! Dear ole' Dad was right, as always.
my dad bought a parker-hale 7mm rem mag when I was born, 1967. I inherited that rifle when I was old enough to hunt, and it's still my go-to gun for everything I hunt.
I had a 270 and liked it but got a 7mm cuz I plan to one day go elk hunting and not dissing the 270 but it AINT a elk cartridge no matter how many jack o connor shot with it. Never saw a cartridge put down deer and elk sized game better than my 7 mag.Every one I have heard talk elk calibers always brings up the great 7 mag for its ability to put em down fast .
@@tomwolak3362 I would not disagree with you.
Why would you use expanding bullets for penetration tests??
🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️ to test hunting rounds
@@WHOTEEWHO normally, if you want to see which caliber penetrates the best, (has more energy) use FMJ. An expanding bullet will not keep penetrating. A fmj .308 will penetrate more than an expanding. 338wm. It makes no sense making penetration video on concrete blocks with expanding bullets 🤷♂️
Point is not to see what bullet can penetrate the farthest, but to test hunting ammo
@@WHOTEEWHO THEN WHY USE BLOCKS AND NOT JELL
I’ve been waiting on this video 🔥🤘🏽🤘🏽
Thanks for watching!
Curious if you would have the same results if the 300 Win Mag was using 150 Grain instead of 180?
No, you more than likely would not have similar results. The 150 grains .30 caliber has a lower sectional density than the same weight bullet in 7mm and less ability to penetrate and retain its weight. The test conducted in this video is accurate in the sense that it compares "apples to apples". Similar bullets sharing the same form factor in different calibers.
I just wanna know why you wouldn’t use the tried and true best hunting round for 7mm rem mag at 160 grain? I haven’t watched the results but and extra 30 grains is pretty unfair. I have noticed this in a couple other videos on other rounds too. Why not use as close as you can comparable ammo? Oh and if you didn’t notice, I chose a 7mm over the win mag a long time ago.
Both glanced up and over the second block, you need to be as straight on as you can get or they will ricochet.
I watch all your vids over and over.
🙏🙏🙏
Just got a Smith and Wesson Model 1500 in 300 win mag. Havent got to shoot it yet. Looking forward to feeling that recoil and seeing how accurate she is!
I'm buying a Remington 700 7mm, this is an interesting video. I'd like to see the comparison at longer range, I keep hearing the 300 mag is the better round for distance and penetration
I have many videos comparing the 2
@@WHOTEEWHO I have watched a couple and I will be watching more. I'm very impressed with both guns. I'm buying the 7mm for an all around big game rifle. I want 1 gun for deer and elk, I live in Indiana so I can't really go any bigger for deer hunting because of our laws here. I don't think I need to go bigger anyway, I watched a video of a guy killing a mountain goat, 760 yards with a 7mm mag. Hell of a shot!
I have 7mm rem mag now. But still taking my old 30.30 for back up moose season is couple weeks away. Cant wait to try the 7mm
Get some fmj and see how many they go through!
@@edwardabrahamiii3742 What an ignorant comment. It is easy to get 7MM FMJ bullets.
Excellent comparisons 👍
Always fun bringing out the magnums.👍🔫👍
I agree!
First let me thank you for posting these comparisons, it is helpful if you are considering either or both of these platforms.
If you are comparing them:
1) both 7mm and 300 bullets should be the same weight.
2) different brands should also be compared.
3) hunting rounds are not meant to penetrate, you should use equal grain, full metal jacket.
4) measuring the energy on impact would be more informative.
5) measuring at say 100yd, 200yd, maybe 500 yd, would be interesting.
👍👍,Thanks
Great VDO
Interestingly, both cartridges have the same belted parent case, i.e., the .375 H&H Magnum.
Thank you for your realistic test I appreciate it you helped me make up my mind thank you be safe out there
Great video! Really great calibers!!
Thanks for watching Chuck!
A friend of mine had a British 303 for many years and he always used Winchester Power Points and those rounds flat put the deer down. And i mean straight down to the ground no tracking them at all.
Yup 303s have some power
The .303 has 95% of the power of the .308 Winchester, so it is no slouch as a cartridge for medium game such as white-tail deer. It's probably a bit light for the largest and most-dangerous game in North America, such as the largest moose, elk or brown/grizzly bear. Most game guides in Alaska wouldn't hunt those with anything smaller than a 30-06, and most want something with even more thump than that, such as a 300 WM, 300 H&H, 338 Win-Mag, or even 375 H&H. Don't get me wrong - a rifle in .303 is certainly better than nothing even with the biggest and most-dangerous game, but shot-placement had better be good. A wounded and badly-ticked off bear can ruin your day...
7mm magnum wins with a smaller grain bullet. Nice. Nocked the hole block off the table. 300 mag did not.
Love the 7mm magnum. 😁👍👍👍
I just bought a R700 7mm and I love it
I've shot both of these rounds and the 7RM is much easier on the shoulder. That being said, on a Whitetail at under 400yds, a 130g 270Win is a better choice... But if you're out to bag a trophy cinder block, I'd recommend the 7RM!
Thanks Paul!!!
Great video my brother. See you soon be safe GOD BLESS. Two powerful rounds. I love my 770 300 win mag.
Yup we need to get together soon.
WHO_TEE_WHO we will soon brother.
7mm has the best ballistic coefficient of any rifle round. Fantastic round.
Would be interesting with fmj
Yes it would
They don’t have 300 win mag in fmj
@@robertl1135 oh? Not hard to load a fmj in the case, I have loaded untold amount of them. Every 30 cal type
@Viscous Shear he has a buddy that handloaded, I do as well, not a biggie
Viscous Shear it’s literally.308 ammo
I think they’ll do about the same, seems like most rifle bullets just i’m a try through two walls and crack the third one even a 530gr solid brass bullet will barely penetrate 4 walls out of my 50 caliber lever action
👍👍
WHO_TEE_WHO looks like the 7 MM cleared the table little better
You should be using 7mm 175.
Can’t wait for cinder block season to start. Or cinder-block-vest-wearing deer season. Do they overlap?
Open season year round!
Since you used the 180gr. load in the 300 WM, why didn't you use the 175 gr. load in the 7RM???
try it w/ a water jug in the 2nd space
bet that 3rd wall fractured w/o contact
-- just from the other 2 breaking and it being
connected by the thick sides
👍👍
Love it! Any chance those rounds went over the 4th wall??? I keep playing back and just wondering!?!? Keep up the great vids!
Could always be a chance! Thanks for watching!
Would hate to have you do it again!!! 😬😬😬😉
I really love those gun you have. Great video.
I love em too!
How about a block test between 6.5 Creedmoor vs 6.0 Creedmoor
👍👍
Hey buddy see if ya can find a railroad plate ta shoot they are interesting because they are tapered from half inch to 3/4 of an inch thick and there free and make a neat sound when hit. Also they come with holes for chain hangers built in.
Good idea
Awesome video brother 👍
Thanks for watching Travis!
@@WHOTEEWHO Anytime, keep 'em coming and I'll keep watching
4th wall break inside a 4th wall break. That's like 16 walls.
DEADPOOL!!
I have had a 7mm Magnum for over forty years, Browning BBR and have never lost a deer a hit is a quick kill usually they drop where they are shot only one deer has ever ran after being hit and he was 260 lb live weight a monster 12 pointer took both lungs and his heart at 200 yards with a154 grain Hornady bullet hand load about 3000fps.
🦌🦌🦌
i have owned both. i prefer the 7mm as i find it a bit more accurate. both hit equally hard with similar rounds. in my opinion at least
Shouldve used a 175 in the 7mm
Thats what I was thinking.
Iv own both shot several deer with both but in my personal opinion the 7 mag put the deer iv killed down faster than the 300 mag just my opinion but iv killed hundreds of deer because of land owners putting me on permits to kill deer off crops that were getting badly damage and having to take long shots I recovered much more deer with out having to get my dog with the 7 mag then I did with the 300 mag sold the 300 kept the 7 mag
@@calvinlayport3127 I feel the same. Last 5 deer I have shot and 3 elk all with 7mm rem mag. All deer were dead before hit the ground and all the elk took not even 10 steps. And died. 1 bull I had to shoot twice but he was dead anyway. Just wanted to keep him close lol
Both rounds are serious large game options for North America & most game on the planet. My choice has been 7mm over the years. I intend to get the Savage High Country in 7mm magnum in a few months.
It appears the 300WM went high, or deflected high, and hit the top edge of the 4th block.
Maybe
Why have the Prince when you can have the King? Like the 270 vs the 30/06 you have more versatility with the bigger caliber!
I am about to buy myself a new deer hunting rifle. I hunt in mid Michigan. On the fence about which one to get. Starting to lean towards the 7MM. Any suggestions!my longest shot is 300 yards. I have a few other rifles.
Good video, Would have been a lil closer test had you used a 175 gr 7mm Rem mag load, Just My opinion
I’ve never tried hunting for those . They are very similar,I prefer the 7mm. Less of a kick and flat shooting,and goes a bit further .
I think contractors like to hunt them. They seem to have a pallet or 2 of decoys at every open space.
Question: Do I get better rifle barrel life when comparing 7MM MAG and 300 WIN MAG?
Winchester SuperX for 7mmMag comes in 175 gr. That would have been better. Plus the strength of the 7mmMag is 160-180 grain. 150gr is under sized for the 7mmMag.
I use 165 in my 300WM.....168 is match
MY father uses 139 in his 7 mag.
@@BamaShinesDistillery The mass of the bullet affects the SD which affects the BC. So for better performance in the 2nd half of a bulllet's range, it's better to use somewhat heavier bullets. That small of bullet would be effective in 0.243-0.270 depending on the intended range.
But if someone inherited a bigger rifle and down sizes the cartridge to match the environment, then the simple academics aren't the only answer.
Every shot a maxium defense pdx? I'm looking to get one but not sure if I want it in 300 black out or 7.62×39.
Nope
You need to use the same grain bullet for a proper comparison
Looks like a win for the 7mm. It got the same performance with a lighter bullet and it has significantly less recoil than the 300 Win Mag.
How many pinewood boards does it take to stop them?
My two favorite calibers for hunting top to bottom, but I only own the 7.
I love my 300 wm. 99 percent one shot dropper. Hog and deer alike
I love em both!
Frotax Frotax randy newbergs favorite round for elk is .300 win mag
In this and some other videos the rifle barrels are angled down. Thus the projectile isn’t contacting the block straight on reducing energy transfer it also deflects the bullet. I expect these differences to be relatively small but sometimes small things make big differences. Try hitting a golf ball straight.
Nonetheless, I enjoy the comparison of different ammunition.
The range itself is angled down so the shots are direct
That’s not apparent in the video, the blocks themselves look horizontal or are they parallel to the ground. Sorry for the Ramblings of an old engineer.
@@garyeaton5719 everything is parallel
Have a browning 7mag, I am confident with it in lower 48!👍,
Very nice!
I actually thought both rounds would have done a lot better. Have you done a paper plates or cinder block vid. firing the .303 Brit. cal. yet..???
Nothing with 303 yet
Thanks who tee who
Thanks for watching!
The video (even slow-mo) does NOT clearly show that three walls were penetrated - the dust obscures what actually happens. My point is, both bullets probably penetrated the first two walls, but due to the shock-wave induced into the block itself at the 1st and 2nd wall penetration events, the shock wave traveling faster than the remnant of the bullet, coupled with the relaxed strength of the block (now damaged; less structural integrity) is probably what finished splitting the blocks in half, i.e., the third wall.
To prove one way or the other, conduct the experiment again this time without the 4th block, and place a camera over/above the 3rd wall so as to witness an actual impact event by the bullet (versus spawl from wall #2, or shock induced fracture as I surmise).
Still, a great demonstration of the power of both cartridges!
Have you tryed FMJ? That'd probably go throw couple more
That ammo looks like i can use it to penetrate the like button
Were the bullets exactly the same, some bullet designs are better for penetration and some for expansion. What counts more in kill power would be how much energy in foot pounds of impact do these rounds have at 100 yards out to 500 yards. Of course without good shot placement penetration does not matter that much.
Noticed both shots that the rifle wasn't level. You had them pointed down about 5 degrees. Maybe a little different result if they were level ??
No. Ground itself is downhill. So the shots were level with the targer
300 win with a 200 grain nosler partitions going 2900 fps is more devastating than anything the 7mm magnum can do. I have both calibers and 160 grain or 175 grain out of a 7mm mag are great at getting the job done, but my 300 win with those bullets does it better at all ranges. I would much rather have my 300 win in the Yukon backcountry where certain critters think a rifle shot is a dinner bell. Not saying the 7mm could not protect me, however I would rather have that heavy 30 with me.
Nice who tee who thanks
energy I believe is 1/2mv^2. So, it all works out eventually. Great vid, a really fun video...))))
👍👍thanks for watching James!
@@WHOTEEWHO I do every video. Is that latest fresh? You getting some fall colors up in the WTW country?
Shoulda did 150gr on both for best comparison. But still cool.
7mmMag SuperX comes in 175gr. That would have been the closest comparison.
I actually have both calibers in the model 783 and i have to say the 300 is alil bit faster then the 7mag. Although I like the 7mag more! Great vid!👍
Thanks for watching George!
About what I was thinking. For 7mm do to 150gr bullet. And being a soft point. Wondering what the 338 win mag would do with 220gr load. Been know tear deer up.
Have to see
@@WHOTEEWHO definitely. My dad ran 338 win for year. It's a cannon when it gos off. Here from pretty faraway when he would hammer a deer. But 338 win been know be the out west or Alaska go to gun.
Don’t loose the brass for either brother. Yeah them bullets blew up
👍👍
300 win mag, you won’t find a better squirrel 🐿 round. Just don’t expect to find any part of it. 7mm, you may find small remnants, great video as always!
😁😁😁