Smaller Battery/More Power? Tested: CP3.0 HO vs. Standard 5.0 M18 Battery

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 2 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 118

  • @nikphoenix
    @nikphoenix 2 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    Funny to go back and watch the early episodes vs the current ones. You have gotten so much more comfortable and better at showing differences.

  • @SouthMainAuto
    @SouthMainAuto 3 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    I just filled out a suggestion card to drop in the box to Astro suggesting they should make the world's first "hybrid impact." Half battery half air. I'll be retiring on the royalties from this idea, I can see it now 😏🤯

    • @fer83381
      @fer83381 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I see you binged all his vids too. Fan of yours✌️

    • @7dioclau
      @7dioclau 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I say why not!!!! 😅

    • @Code325
      @Code325 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Serious question - I have an idea for Snap On. Is there actually a way that I can make money from my idea, or do they just take it and say “thanks”?

    • @griffintaylor3861
      @griffintaylor3861 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Code325 This is a guess sp take it with a grain of salt, but if you were to write it down some formal way with the date (and evidence of that date) before giving it to them, then if they were to use it anyways you may be able to sue them for royalties. That or get a patent and then email them about it

    • @Lucas12v
      @Lucas12v 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      How about air to electric. The air turns a generator that makes electricity for an electric motor. It's kind of like a diesel locomotive so it must be good right? Just kidding of course

  • @TurboTyTy
    @TurboTyTy 3 ปีที่แล้ว +94

    I often ask my wife this very question...

  • @Drundel
    @Drundel 3 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    I'm a Makita fan, but I have to give props to Milwaukee for leading the R&D curve of cordless tools.

    • @meme5887
      @meme5887 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The torque curve?

    • @larrytate1657
      @larrytate1657 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I switched to all Milwuakee and wouldn’t go back, even their weed eater and blower are awesome. Their 18v fuel impact is my fav impact.

  • @Jay_Ira
    @Jay_Ira 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Thanks for your diligence as always. This channel will grow exponentially soon. I'm looking forward to more air impacts being tested in the future as well as seeing some cordless ratchets. Keep up the great work!

  • @riceball777
    @riceball777 3 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    I own the cp3.0 as well as the xc5.0 and high output 8.0. With my impact driver as well as the mid torque and my hammer drill I can tell the tool is stronger with the 3.0 compared to the 5.0 and even stronger with the 8.0.

    • @JudgeBuster
      @JudgeBuster ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Same here. The M18 CP 3.0's are also far cheaper than the 5.0s and up. Bigger doesn't mean better, but Milwaukee wants it's fans to think so

  • @-fazik-3713
    @-fazik-3713 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Having 3X 5.0 I bought 2XCP3.0. Did not notice any difference in performance, but it is lighter so it is a win. They do cost a small fortune here in Poland though (90$ for the cheapest).

    • @JudgeBuster
      @JudgeBuster ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Here in the USA the 3.0 CP batteries are available everywhere for less than $50 each for two - Amazon, eBay, & many other websites. The 3.0s are excellent. That's all I'm going to buy from now on

  • @cardo1111
    @cardo1111 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Very well done, appreciate you sharing your expertise. I know Home Depot offered a package with the Milwaukee High Torque impact wrench with an 8.0 HO battery, would be interesting to see the increase in power between the XC 5.0 battery and the 8.0 HO battery 👍🏽

    • @JudgeBuster
      @JudgeBuster ปีที่แล้ว

      It's not that much as far as actual consistent torque in all tools. Bigger isn't always better. The actual length of battery charge varies widely depending on the work being done and which tool is being used

  • @PhillyFixed
    @PhillyFixed 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I linked this video in a pinned comment on my latest Flex video. Thank you, this is awesome, along with your comparison of all M18 batteries. We need more objective and useful content like this! 👍 It's not only interesting but informs battery purchase decisions for people that need to use these tools every day, and when you have batteries that cost as much as almost $220, it matters!

    • @TorqueTestChannel
      @TorqueTestChannel  3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Hey thanks Busted in Philly! Worth keeping in mind these are for high draw but shortish use impact tools (because of the disconnect between motor and impact hammer mechanisms). Might be very different on a drill for instance with a constant and potentially longer draw.

    • @JudgeBuster
      @JudgeBuster ปีที่แล้ว

      The Red Lithium M18 3.0 CP batteries can be bought new for less than $50 each if you look around. They're everywhere, eBay, Amazon, & many other websites - because Milwaukee fans don't buy them often enough.

  • @slpurvis1
    @slpurvis1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    On the subject of HO batteries I would really appreciate seeing DeWalts 20x XR 6.0 batteries vs their 5.0 ah XR batteries. I feel the 21700 cells make that much of a difference over the 18650. But before I invest in more 20v XR 6.0’s I’d like to see some data to back up my suspicions. Thank you guys for your consistency , money spent and hard work. It’s certainly appreciated. Looking forward to 1000’s, well maybe hundreds of more videos 😂.

  • @andrewziegler2608
    @andrewziegler2608 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Hey the intro, voice over, and editing is awesome and Surprise to only see thousand something subscribers. Just wait till the algorithm catches this. should be easily over 100 K. Just like other channels like project farm etc. Just takes time. good luck

    • @TorqueTestChannel
      @TorqueTestChannel  3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Wow, thanks! We're tool people, so sort of just learning this editing and production as we go, so really appreciate you saying so. Trying to get better each video.

  • @Clare.1985
    @Clare.1985 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    TorqueTest I know I'm not alone in wanting to see this. Would you please do a simular comparison like you've done here but with a reputable knock off m18 battery? I would be willing to fund the knock offs and perhaps do the research as to what the best ones are. Could really use your help on this. Thanks and keep them coming!

  • @leeh9420
    @leeh9420 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have the Mid Gen 2 and the 3.0 HO, 6.0 and 8.0 - this made me feel great about all the work on my car I'm getting ready to do with over the next week or so...

  • @Borescoped
    @Borescoped 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    If you are going to run a H.O. 6.0 battery... might as well step it up to the H.O. 8.0 battery. Same case, same size cells internally, should be same weight, more total storage capacity. Edit: just saw the newer video showing the battery comparisons, good job!

  • @Ethnosis
    @Ethnosis ปีที่แล้ว +1

    God I haven’t noticed the audio quality has improved so much comparing your new videos

  • @sebsefyu
    @sebsefyu ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome test. Big thanks. Just ordered cp3.0.

  • @eric49a
    @eric49a 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you! For someone finally testing batteries and tools in a standardized way that makes sense! I want to see the MAC tools impact guns and how they compare

  • @karzygijose
    @karzygijose 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The 5.0 is the tried and true battery honestly sure 3.0 offers almost the same performance but the 5.0 longer runtime

  • @ronbeton1999
    @ronbeton1999 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Just found this channel. Awsome guys, keep up the good work!!!

  • @TsunauticusIV
    @TsunauticusIV 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Aww. My comment was on there! Thank you 🙏 yeah... I still love those love graph things. 😂

  • @johnny4713ify
    @johnny4713ify 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I ended up getting the 3 and 8 high output batteries for my Gen 1 Mid torque and the power difference from the 3 to the 8 is pretty noticeable. I skipped the 6 since the footprint of the 8 is the same and they say you gain 15-20% over the 6. I switch between the 2 depending on fastener and the room I have to work with. Generally though I rock the 3 since it's lighter. It be really cool to see what that Gen 2 can do with an 8 or even that crazy 12 high output battery👍

    • @ezrawaters6653
      @ezrawaters6653 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      The 12.0 is amazing with their string trimmer. I have 2, and can weed eat an hour straight in thick grass with each

    • @johnny4713ify
      @johnny4713ify 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@ezrawaters6653 Nice!!! I only have one impact wrench so far with that battery platform, but looking at picking up a M18 leaf blower here shortly so the hour or so run time with a 12 would great. I like the more compact Gen 2 Mid torque so I have my eye on upgrading aswell as a picking up a high torque m18 impact, but waiting on the Gen 3. The high output batteries on impacts do bump up the power a good bit.

    • @ezrawaters6653
      @ezrawaters6653 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@johnny4713ify I’ve ran a runtime test with the M18 Blower and 12.0 battery. It will consistently last 25 minutes each time with the trigger locked and in high speed. That means if you’re not constantly holding the trigger fully down, it would last 30+ minutes in high speed mode

    • @johnny4713ify
      @johnny4713ify 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ezrawaters6653 U Da Man LOL Glad to know what to expect. I only use my corded blower 15-20min Max to dust off my Patio so maybe the 8 will do for now. BTW I just got back from HD was gonna pick up there Buy more save more deal on a Mid and High Torque impacts, but they only had the Mid in stock SMH.

    • @JimmyVaught
      @JimmyVaught 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      The 12 ho batteries are amazing, I'd never pay full retail but I'm able to get them for $150 shipped which makes it worthwhile to use.

  • @Shawnxsather
    @Shawnxsather 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I’m watching this 2 years later as a long time Milwaukee owner, I have the blower and the grinder and they chew through 5.0 batteries, so I picked up a Home Depot special buy with an HD 12.0 and it came with 2 CP 3.0 batteries for the same price as a 12.0 by itself (250) and I wanted to see how they stacked up, I actually didn’t plan on using them, but now I think I will on my lighter tools like my m18 drill.

  • @CP-ok1gv
    @CP-ok1gv 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    IVE BEEN WAITING FOR THIS!! Glad I subscribed. Great vid great job. Although the 3.0 is shorter and lighter, it is longer and wider, so the size doesn’t seem proportionately smaller. I’m guessing the 2.0 doesn’t keep up like the 3?

    • @CP-ok1gv
      @CP-ok1gv 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ZeGermanHam I agree. The batteries now are small in my opinion but if they can make them more powerful and keep same size that would be great.

    • @legros731
      @legros731 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      These h.o battery use 27700 battery and the regular one use 18650 battery

    • @dwhite832003
      @dwhite832003 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      My thought exactly!

  • @onebd4dr
    @onebd4dr 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    M12 Fuel Stubby 3/8" Impact Wrench

    • @stickmanbw
      @stickmanbw 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      There is a difference between the m12 3.0 and the 6.0

  • @MrEvolutionR
    @MrEvolutionR 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    This and the next Battery video are exactly the Video I was looking for, greetings from Germany.

  • @owensamuels-h1r
    @owensamuels-h1r 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for the great video. Wondering about “runtime” CP 3.0 v XC 5.0- for Milwaukee orbital car polisher. If the power is about the same - should the runtime be equivalent under similar conditions ? Since the Polisher is different from the tested impact wrench - where a polisher capacity /runtime and weight are the important variables - and similar question for the XC 6.0 v 8.0.

  • @JudgeBuster
    @JudgeBuster ปีที่แล้ว

    In a day of Orwellian doublespeak and marketing & sales gimmicks, you guys are the champs of the truth about tools with the vital information that matters most - how much power do they really have & which batteries live up to the manufacturer's claims?
    I wish you guys would take all of Milwaukee's current line of impact drivers - both brushless & Fuel and test them for their spec claims. It's really odd to me that they offer so many different impacts with minor performance variations. I've got almost every one & there is little difference in their power & performance with either the M18 3.0 CP & the 5.0 XC. I'd be happy to help cover the cost of the test run.

  • @POLOLOUS3
    @POLOLOUS3 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A different tool like their M18 framing nailer minimum requirement is the 5.0. The 3.0 doesn’t consistently allow nails to be fully set.

    • @nehemiasmartinez2985
      @nehemiasmartinez2985 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      That's what i wanted to know, if the H.O. 3 amp battery woulf be good for the framing nailer, cuz I wanted to cut on the weight

  • @riceball777
    @riceball777 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    to be fair 21700 cells are physically 50% bigger and heavier than 18650 cells. The cp3.0 had five samsung 21700 30t cells and the xc5.0 has ten samsung 18650 25r cells. Thats why the cp3.0 really is not much smaller or lighter than the xc5.0. The cp3.0 is physically shorter but is longer and wider than the xc5.0 and is only about 15% lighter. five 21700 cells are comparable to eight 18650cells in terms are size, weight and mass. This is also why the high out put xc6.0 and 8.0 have ten 21700 cells but they are actually bigger and weight more than the m18 hd 9.0 which has fifteen 18650 cells.

  • @mmmmmlemons
    @mmmmmlemons ปีที่แล้ว

    The 3ah HO battery is quite a bit longer out the front which gets in the way when using shorter bits in impact drivers or stubby sockets on an impact wrench.

  • @galvanizedgnome
    @galvanizedgnome 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I bet you will start getting those Mr. BATES checks soon

  • @howardp924
    @howardp924 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Just a heads up. The CP3.0 battery does not fit in the blow molded Milwaukee case(s).

    • @MrErichonda30
      @MrErichonda30 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Good because they belong in the trash anyway.

  • @Brad-tq2pi
    @Brad-tq2pi 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent! Thanks, just what I wanted to see. I own a bunch of xc 5.0 but are big and heavy. Was looking for a smaller battery but didn’t want to give up power. You just proved I can have my cake and eat it too. LOL. Keep it up with the great testing.

    • @larrytate1657
      @larrytate1657 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      They’re only a few oz lighter though I think.

    • @JudgeBuster
      @JudgeBuster ปีที่แล้ว

      @@larrytate1657 Much more than a few ounces. Look it up

    • @JudgeBuster
      @JudgeBuster ปีที่แล้ว

      You can find new OEM M18 3.0 CP batteries for less than $50 all over the place, eBay, Amazon, & many more. They work great & weigh much less than 5.0s & up

  • @dexterousx92
    @dexterousx92 ปีที่แล้ว

    *Thanks for making this testing video. It answers a lot of battery questions I had.* DexterousX

  • @juhu34
    @juhu34 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Im thinking the weight of the battery is affecting the performance, so probably raw power output at the motor is higher with the 3.0 battery.

  • @charlesflores9714
    @charlesflores9714 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video idea.

  • @chriscas-ToolAficionado
    @chriscas-ToolAficionado 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Looks like an Aircat is up next. Interesting channel! It's pretty rediculous how North American brands have long been hyper-inflating their specs. This channel puts those figures in check!

    • @TorqueTestChannel
      @TorqueTestChannel  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Agreed. 1715 ft lbs from a 1/2" is just insulting to our intellegence I feel. The new Aircat video was just posted!

    • @chriscas-ToolAficionado
      @chriscas-ToolAficionado 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@TorqueTestChannel hah! Just watched it!

  • @colemanbonner
    @colemanbonner 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    As usual, girth makes up for the height lol.

  • @johnchilton5949
    @johnchilton5949 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    All three batteries. 5.0,3.0,8.0. The 3.0 won’t hardly run my 6” grinder. The 5.0 does decent but doesn’t last long.

  • @dwhite832003
    @dwhite832003 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    How about a video on 2.0 vs a 3.0HO, because the 2.0 gives you you the smallest form factor.

  • @shakblak7900
    @shakblak7900 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The gen 2 mid tourque loves to eat charge on the 3.0, but on my high torque 2863 is more efficient on charge with the 3.0 packs

  • @7dioclau
    @7dioclau 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    SMA approved!!!!
    Subscribed!!!!!!
    Good channel, keep doing you!!
    👍

  • @kickeraudio987
    @kickeraudio987 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Can you do this same test with the new Forged battery. Not many videos out there with this impact and the forge battery

  • @james10739
    @james10739 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I don't know why in that package they did not use the samsung 40t that is a 4Ah rated to 30 or 35 amp output

  • @Supersonicff-dw6bs
    @Supersonicff-dw6bs 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    First I'm not an Engineer, and this comment is not to dog your efforts. A few things that came to mind while watching you test this battery powered impact.
    1) Testing different battery packs back to back may be giving you flawed data if the impact was at room temperature when you ran the first test, then switched packs and tested the 2nd pack immediately. The reason why is heat buildup in the motor and gearbox from the first test.
    2) The smaller pack will not have as long of a life compared to a larger packs, so you may end up buying more smaller replacement packs over time in you use the impact frequently in a repair shop.
    - The pack is going to be discharged and recharged more frequently in a shorter period of time.
    - Fewer battery cells to spread the current load over means they get hotter during discharging and recharging, and heat has a major impact on cell health over time.
    Just some considerations to think about.
    3) Without testing the packs performance independent of the tool, how would you know that the packs are both good (i.e. one is not defective in some way) to start with?

  • @EVILVIKTOR
    @EVILVIKTOR 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    You should compare the MAC Tools mid Torque with the Milwaukee mid Torque. The reason I say that is because I leaning towards the Milwaukee but my MAC dealer has a pretty sweet deal on the mid Torque Impact right now.

    • @brendan747
      @brendan747 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      the mac won’t be anywhere close to the milwaukee. warranty sucks, it’s just rebranded dewalt.

  • @bobert201164
    @bobert201164 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'd like to see the bauer battery impact tested with the 4 and 5 amp hour battery

  • @timothybayliss6680
    @timothybayliss6680 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If only big red would give us some proper M18 18650 HO packs. The M12 HO uses samsung 25S cells v the 25R cells used in the M18 packs. If there was a M18 5.0+ that used the considerably newer 25S cells it would stop the 3.0cpho into the dirt. The 25S has less voltage drop at 30a then the 25R has at 20a. I think a new 3.0xc would actually beat a new 5.0xc. The 15M cells have less initial voltage drop and for a 15 second test that will carry it.

  • @TheAlexcutting
    @TheAlexcutting 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What model in the mid torque impact used here? Thanks

  • @justinmartin8887
    @justinmartin8887 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Just remember the warranty difference

  • @skye1212
    @skye1212 ปีที่แล้ว

    I keep thinking Milwaukee should be releasing stacked lithium batteries soon??? Been waiting before investing more $$$ in batteries.

  • @larrytate1657
    @larrytate1657 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    So it’s about just a tad over a quarter pound lighter. I thought it’d be even more than that given the size difference.

  • @andybrooks4070
    @andybrooks4070 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    could we get a dewalt mid torque 1/2 impact test, the DCF896, there arent any reviews online that really test the torque of this thing other than using it on lug nuts

    • @mikeday8826
      @mikeday8826 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I have the Mac Tools version of that impact. I love it. I am an auto mechanic and it does 95% of what I need to do. Very rarely do I have to pull out my full size 1/2 inch Mac gun.

  • @paulobella1857
    @paulobella1857 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can you do a torque test on 3/4 impact guns?

  • @jakegolliher2891
    @jakegolliher2891 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is it the indiviual battery's capacity, or the fact that there are more batteries in the pack that make the difference?

    • @JudgeBuster
      @JudgeBuster ปีที่แล้ว

      The main factor in all battery & tool performance has a lot more to do with the type of work being done, such as drilling concrete with masonry bits, which draws a lot of power/energy to do the job. Or just light work as drilling into wood or installing wood screws. The torque or power demand is what determines the overall performance on the different m18 battery sizes. The M18 3.0 CP batteries are less then $50 each all over the place. Start with Amazon & eBay. There are authorized Milwaukee OEM resellers for batteries & accessories on both sites. I'll take two 3.0s over any 5.0, 6.0, or larger any day for any job. The bigger is better game Milwaukee plays is just a gimmick for the average tradesmen who uses his tools every single day.

  • @carlovincentvicedo746
    @carlovincentvicedo746 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    5amp xc vs 6amp high output pls. Size dimension too

  • @drudown3098
    @drudown3098 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love your channel thank you for what you do

  • @legros731
    @legros731 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    These HO battery are 27700 size
    The normal battery are 18650 size
    27700 battery have bigger discharge rate

    • @TorqueTestChannel
      @TorqueTestChannel  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I believe it's 21700, we're going over that in our full M18 video!

    • @legros731
      @legros731 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@TorqueTestChannel yes sorry typo its 21700 for 21 mm in diameter and 700mm length

    • @legros731
      @legros731 ปีที่แล้ว

      @boogiedahomeylol yes you are right brain fart for sure lol

  • @carlostorres1778
    @carlostorres1778 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Milwakee against a delwakee (same milwakee with a dewalt battery

  • @takenusername
    @takenusername ปีที่แล้ว

    Why didn’t you run the HO 6AH test? You could have proved your point that AH makes a difference

  • @willc5979
    @willc5979 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can you test the xc 3.0 vs the cp 3.0

  • @mediumgrey8674
    @mediumgrey8674 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Add the gen2 impact to your thumbnail for more views.

  • @_Otaku-kt8be
    @_Otaku-kt8be 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'd still rather have the 5amp

  • @machineryandtools6214
    @machineryandtools6214 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I dont know how to send a message but can you test the makita xwt08?

    • @TorqueTestChannel
      @TorqueTestChannel  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      We'll do that

    • @machineryandtools6214
      @machineryandtools6214 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@TorqueTestChannel Awesome. Ive always wondered how it compared as it gets the least press.

  • @zaq55555555555555555
    @zaq55555555555555555 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Do you think the same holds true if used on the 2767-20?

    • @TorqueTestChannel
      @TorqueTestChannel  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      We tested that, and yes. Al long as both batteries are equal charge level.

    • @zaq55555555555555555
      @zaq55555555555555555 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@TorqueTestChannel welp, looks like im switching over to the ho batteries. That gun is already heavy enough as it is, if i can save some weight i will absolutely do so. Thanks for the reply, really shows quality as a content creator. 👌

  • @getrdid2000red
    @getrdid2000red ปีที่แล้ว

    I bought the 3.0 HO. Because of your video showing it was lighter. And sounded great But your full of shit.
    .27 ounces lighter is what it is in real life.
    Thats not light enough to get a longer shorter way more expensive battery for. Now I have to drive 2 hrs to return it.

    • @TorqueTestChannel
      @TorqueTestChannel  ปีที่แล้ว +3

      lol "real life" we literally put pictures of the tool with the two different batteries on a scale 3:14 . And put all the batteries weights on screen here: th-cam.com/video/ky5YRjz9lvc/w-d-xo.html

    • @MrCaribe65
      @MrCaribe65 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You have to put your purse down dude. It gets in the way, when doing man work. Good luck!

  • @wendellgreenidge3362
    @wendellgreenidge3362 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can’t believe I noticed my name in the video over a year later lol