The Problem With Asking People For Evidence - David Charalambus Interview

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 พ.ค. 2024
  • Get our FREE Peace Keepers and Court Auditor courses here at peacekeepers.org.uk/
    FREE Council Tax dispute challenge download here noc.peacekeepers.org.uk/
    "Peace Keepers have been created to help secure a just and equitable existence., coming together to defend the peoples peace, to restore and preserve our inalienable rights, the highest standing in truth to be sovereign."
    Nothing can be done to the prejudice of the people.
    (Bill of Rights 1688)
    Law is the people’s birth right.
    (Act of Settlement 1700)
    All are equal under the law.
    No one is above the law.
    Ignorance of the law is no excuse.
    No one can knowingly impose their will upon any other without freewill.
    Everybody has lawful excuse to the right of self defence.
    ---------------------------------
    Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976
    Allowance is made for "fair use" purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research.
    -----------------------------------------------------------

ความคิดเห็น • 102

  • @Bruce4lmighty
    @Bruce4lmighty 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    I’m one of many who have experienced the anger of people I’ve tried to share information with in good faith and couldn’t understand why I received the response I did. I stopped to think about this and consider what I could do differently. During this period, I noticed that the people I had previously spoke to started to figure things out for themselves and started to ask me questions. I carefully answered their questions where my answers were deliberately limited to just the answer and found I ended up answering more questions without the anger that was present originally. My conclusion is that people will only listen when they are ready to listen and there is nothing we can do to force them. What we can do is employ tactics such as those described by David to prompt people to think about something that will likely lead to those people wanting answers to the new questions they now have. Great information and advice, much appreciated 👍🏻

    • @keithshippey230
      @keithshippey230 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The concert was think about other before yourself and be proud of it

    • @JohnSmith-vy4lh
      @JohnSmith-vy4lh 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I know what you mean. I gave up preaching 15 years ago. People don''t want to know about how they are being fucked over, especially if they think there's nothing that can be done about it.
      They don't seem to comprehend that they pay up to 80% of their earnings in taxes and fees.
      That the money and banking system is totally unlawful.
      That our very culture is under serious threat from mass immigration , which needs urgent attention.
      That medicine is controlled by greedy big pharma.
      That international NGOs make rules for us that nobody ever voted for or want.
      That their children are being pumped full of toxins and getting show disgusting images and literature by gender bending marxist woke teachers in the schools.
      That there is a western depopulation programme in place.
      That communism is alive and well in our country.
      And many many more things.
      But if you tell them how not to pay their water bill, then some start to listen. It's all about self interest these days. I'm alright Jack, fuck everybody else mentality.

  • @MrMadieu
    @MrMadieu 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I fulljoyed that. Great guest and amazing subject. Most relevant in these times!

  • @wa1-marketing955
    @wa1-marketing955 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Decades ago, I taught Marketing, and the one thing I used to emphasize to my students, is it takes roughly 7 times to reinforce a belief to any action.
    So in marketing speak it takes a person to see an ad 7 times before the belief is reinforced.
    That's why large corporations have succeeded in the last 7+ decades...
    They had the advertising budgets. But since Social media became more prominent, the centrally controlled TV ads have less impact.
    But we should be WARY of governmental oversight of the internet. The Censorship is really just a way to steer the narrative, the message in the direction of the Status Quo...
    Self Interest, of themselves and their big government supporters.

  • @robertgodwin3339
    @robertgodwin3339 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I believe it would be very beneficial to all to do a video on the police and their imposing of legislation on the people and where we stand lawfully. It’s obvious that vast amounts of money is being made from victimless crimes ie speeding parking etc. your knowledge on this would be much appreciated. Many many thanks to you all for the hard work you are putting in to wake people up to their birthright on natural law 🙏

  • @Bruce4lmighty
    @Bruce4lmighty 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    47:00 It’s even deeper than David mentions; people choose to watch social media ‘influencers’ yet INSIST they are not influenced by the ‘influencer’. Stockholm Syndrome…

    • @nicotoscani1707
      @nicotoscani1707 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      alex jones, jordan peterson and andrew tate? I've added vivek to my list of faves recently

    • @Bruce4lmighty
      @Bruce4lmighty 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@nicotoscani1707 ?

    • @Linda-iw5sj
      @Linda-iw5sj 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Peterson is part of ARC This is why I don’t believe he is on our side.

  • @MsGemini321
    @MsGemini321 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    I love the fact that you were more than happy to welcome David's advice .. you don't claim to know it all. You are perfectly willing and have been bold enough to have asked certain people to have a discussion to hear the others' points of view. It would really be a much better place if we all gave the other side an opertunity to sort out the truth together.. its what we all want in the long run ..isn't it? ❤

  • @Jimmy-ew2xe
    @Jimmy-ew2xe 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    A great conversation chaps 👍

  • @robfloders8730
    @robfloders8730 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Love the info Gentlemen I'm learning so much

  • @Jimimac73
    @Jimimac73 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Excellent

  • @zipperdeedooha
    @zipperdeedooha 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    My God! An intelligent man. Great.

  • @LyubkaLifePath
    @LyubkaLifePath 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This was fascinating! Thank you all! Such an eye opener!

  • @genuinearticle33
    @genuinearticle33 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    @5:58 "it's more, what you are saying means to them, than what your saying actually means is what matters to them" Bang on Point David.

  • @msmrepo3271
    @msmrepo3271 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Great vid 👌
    I'm surprised the Stanford Prison experiment was not mentioned.
    I learned a lot from listening to the recordings of myself with other entities, that I overreacted, I always had something that breached my peace, but I would go on and on, full pelt, I'll put a lien on you, ect ect. It was a great lesson learned and has served me well, educated me in many ways.
    I look like I would kick off, like the sort of person to start f-ing and blinding, I know it shocks them when I stay calm which makes it easy to rebutt the crap thrown at you. So much so people lie to the extent it could jail you, and carry on those lies even though I have video evidence, I smile now before I got angry 😊

  • @user-hv1yf2rm7m
    @user-hv1yf2rm7m 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    VERY interesting debate …I think so many of us fail to see how an “ educated” person can’t see the Obvious .

    • @nozyparker
      @nozyparker 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It's mainly just being rational in your thinking, like why am I doing something is it I need too or want too, or both. Most new year plans don't happen because if you were going to do it, you would already would have.

    • @mareegeorge8641
      @mareegeorge8641 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@nozyparkerI feel the same about new year resolutions. It's much better to do it when you realise you really want to do something.

  • @ramadasa_7
    @ramadasa_7 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Very helpful 🙏

  • @nicotoscani1707
    @nicotoscani1707 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    37:00 and onward is neil degrasse tyson summed up to perfection... brilliant

  • @professionalgambler74
    @professionalgambler74 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    great interview guys, love a bit of critical thinking.

    • @keithshippey230
      @keithshippey230 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Critical is A state of shock doesn’t help with thinking

  • @angusmacmillan5365
    @angusmacmillan5365 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Brilliant interview!

  • @publicnotice4169
    @publicnotice4169 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Emotional regulation is the way forward well said

  • @xdc1776
    @xdc1776 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    plausible deniability comes to mind 😂

  • @dmitrikhmelevski9214
    @dmitrikhmelevski9214 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It is always interesting to listen David. Thank you for this.

  • @nicotoscani1707
    @nicotoscani1707 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    38:30 by nhs staff i hope you are just talking about the nursing staff.. the doctors (and junior doctors) are all paid crazy amounts.. especially now they get bonuses for injecting the medical intervention and it's paid extra per head, not household

  • @alang911
    @alang911 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Very informative 👍

  • @pippamellon8678
    @pippamellon8678 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I would say this also part of consciousness …there are several layers to the awakened soul…knowledge and understanding is great but the spiritual side of our beings is just as important.l feel lots of us have lost our way on how to interact with people and have healthy discussions, which you can’t have when people shut down..

  • @user-nx6mv5vk9q
    @user-nx6mv5vk9q 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You can't make sense, from non-sense, it's the words magic they've fed us, WHO, you may ask!

  • @pippamellon8678
    @pippamellon8678 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Great insight…I agree with this…it also happens when the awake knows lots of thing but doesn’t know everything ..then when you show and tell the awakened person new information .they immediately close it done as being impossible because they feel they should have known it it or they dismiss it because it wasn’t in there radar…I would call this our ego..😊.we should never get stuck in any belief even with evidence because evidence changes, science changes…history and so on…I try hard to keep an open mind on everything ..the put you downs on these channels are truly amazing..lTrolls!!?? Or just egotistical twats..!!.

  • @nicotoscani1707
    @nicotoscani1707 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    36:16 I got banned before I got even 1 strike.. but I don't blame you, I put the blame squarely on one bad actor on the moderating team.... most telegram groups have this problem .. there's always one on a power trip and its usually someone with emotional stability problems

  • @zipperdeedooha
    @zipperdeedooha 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What is the question behind the question? Can be quite useful.

  • @Boyz2MenBarbers
    @Boyz2MenBarbers 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Recognising your emotions and how we deal with situations can determine how we react towards ourselves and others and once you can connect and rationalise in a honest manger. We can change for the better but it's easy to fall back into the bullshit. For years I was angry with myself by taken it out on others which effect my relationships and friendship because I did know how to regulate my emotions. It began from a baby and the emotions detachment of my parents and their indoctrination had an impact on my behaviour and consequently I fell into the system.
    Was Aristotle right when he said, Give me a child until he is 7 and I will show you the man?
    What worked for me was to challenge my own beliefs and how I dealt with situations in the past and present. I had to focus on myself and ask question, why I was so unhappy. It was evident I was in conflict with myself and I'm still am to be honest but I'm able to manage the bullshit better😊

  • @nicotoscani1707
    @nicotoscani1707 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    45:50 is how to beat addiction (but keep some bottles on ice incase our internal organs decide to pack in cos they're not as strong as the control we have on our own subconcious mind)

  • @10tendogsdonie
    @10tendogsdonie 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Brilliant post,👏👏
    Wokeism = unelected rishi sunak identifys himself as our prime minister,
    not 1 man or woman voted him to represent us, in this our christian country,

    • @jameschambers6975
      @jameschambers6975 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      All voting is pantomime - the establishment is no more than a world-wide stage managed
      demonic conspiracy. (£ucifer - $atan) Look up the meaning of NPC mentioned in this podcast.

  • @stuarthargreaves5314
    @stuarthargreaves5314 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Are the people who claim that we are wrong the ones who have most to lose: Politicians(national - Local ) Civil servants, Solicitors ( Imagine the loss of credibility) those who's work comes from outsourcing of government or local councils and any other organisation who benefit from the public being Sheep. The two party system is not democratic, its not what the people want or need it about part policy, so by relinquishing their duty of service of those they represent. they have dumbed down our right to peaceful process, and the right to withhold labour, anyone who now disagrees is called a extremist or dissident, the Big brother bill that was recently passed that allows them to spy on peoples bank accounts without need for a warrant or the person in question knowledge there off, so where does it end are they trying to get to the stage of WEF Klaus Schwaub's claim the people will have nothing and be happy? We need to keep asking probing and questioning everything Government

  • @eastcoastuk1120
    @eastcoastuk1120 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I went to a Magistrates Court not that I spoke to a magistrate but just a council worker and told them unless they sent me a DEMAND NOTICE and not a BILL I would challenge them to show me a contract.. The Council worker said I know what you are saying but if ypu look at the BILL is says Demand Notice underneath. I came home and checked my BILL no mention of a demand notice only this is your BILL.

  • @davidgleeson9225
    @davidgleeson9225 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    How long is a piece of string theory

    • @Jimimac73
      @Jimimac73 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Twice half its length proof!😂

    • @davidgleeson9225
      @davidgleeson9225 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Jimimac73
      If you fold it it is still one length
      If you cut it you will loose some

  • @johnharris2944
    @johnharris2944 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What’s the name of the Telegram group pls? Or a link preferably.
    Fantastic interview btw 🙏🏼❤️

  • @Non-corpus-juris
    @Non-corpus-juris 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Brian`s idea is good; so how about a role play in a Magistrates Court to show the process where everyone can see how the this works and how the legal vrs lawful arguments are won and lost.

    • @davidgleeson9225
      @davidgleeson9225 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The thing is with your idea is that it's not a real scenario
      In a real court you have an appeal system
      In the fake one you don't
      So there will be no satisfactory conclusion
      So how do you take the fake court to court would be the objective in the act
      And there lies the performance
      I hope you don't mind my intrusion

    • @Non-corpus-juris
      @Non-corpus-juris 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Tricky and awkward points you make so I`ll try to address the key points you`ve made:
      If the court requires an appeals process then this is a civil court of Admiralty jurisdiction* (not to be confused with Admiralty law) and not of a court of record and equity. So where this jurisdiction has not been challenged it stands and you/we lose.
      If the court is presumed to be fake as in a hired venue (within a public building), we can invoke a common law court of record to convert it into a legitimate court of law.
      Satisfactory conclusions are obtained by establishing the correct jurisdiction, nullifying or disqualifying the Judges or Magistrates by binding them to their fiduciary duty (oaths) to uphold the law in accord to our primary law and constitution; and by asserting our fundamental and constitutional right to trial by jury before the law.
      Where they fail to honour their oaths, we can require them to discharge with prejudice in our favour.
      Brian`s role play if adopted for a Magistrate's court re-enactment would be able to explore these areas and Marc's most excellent knowledge of the law would excel with its surgical precision.
      (*) Quick note on Admiralty Jurisdiction; this is a rail roader that they rely on and use to block us from accessing common law.
      Thanks for the intrusion = most welcome :)

    • @user-bq3og5pz9w
      @user-bq3og5pz9w 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@davidgleeson9225
      At a lawful court of record once the parties are before the court and the judgment is handled down it’s done for all time
      But if you get a summery judgment or default judgment because the man never appear then it can be applied and reheard again
      in a quasi Court legal person summery conviction Court it can be applied if you know what your doing

    • @user-bq3og5pz9w
      @user-bq3og5pz9w 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Non-corpus-juris
      But the people don’t have the knowledge to establish their own court and start a case with a number and how to fill the claim form out . Nor how to write a notice that open a lawful court of record and require the court staff to do their duties.
      And who ( not what) their making a claim against.

    • @Non-corpus-juris
      @Non-corpus-juris 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes this is the problem and why people like the Peace Keepers who know the law and to how it should be accessed are the solution@@user-bq3og5pz9w

  • @Stormer-Europa
    @Stormer-Europa 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Endless back and forth arguing of the law/statutes. I remember years ago Dean Clifford who knew the "law" backwards and still got chunked in a Cell. Much like Julian Assange today or a David Irving or years gone by. Persist with the truth and out come the real guns. Paper pushing is a waste of F time when you never address the real group behind all the wars, debt and usury.
    Reach out to me and we can discuss it. If you have the cahunas

  • @reality_pls5696
    @reality_pls5696 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Your trying to assert your position as the truth and set yourselves up as arbitars of truth particularly within this space.
    Multiple videos you say your not debating what youve concluded.
    The facts and evidence havent been proved.until PK can demonstrate win on council tax in court. PK are acting as much on belief as everyone else.

    • @nicotoscani1707
      @nicotoscani1707 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      the win doesn't matter cos the truth defends itself ... the truth is there is no contract with the council and therefore no liability falls upon yourself to pay it.. this is irrespective of whether or not a socially conditioned (mind controlled) judge agrees with it and decides in your favour

    • @reality_pls5696
      @reality_pls5696 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@nicotoscani1707 sorry, but that's not the issue their having. Everyone and their dog within this space agrees council tax is wrong/unlawful. The debate/area of contention is... Why and what arguments against council tax are valid. PK have their method. They have their website and a bunch of material. The truth is, they do not work.... Hence why PK still pay their council tax. PK have put forward a theory.. and are trying to prove it. they are operating from a point of belief.
      Personally you can go on about legislation all day. Fundamentally, to tax a living being for having a roof is no different to taxing them for using the air. There can never be a law/rule that is valid that can do as such. It would make you a slave and property denying your innate right to exist. I build from that foundation.. without it, no argument really matters. They can just update the legislation.

    • @Non-corpus-juris
      @Non-corpus-juris 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Simple truth that is certifiable fact - Legislation is not actual law; it is a rule/regulation only given force of law where it does not contravene either a human right and or a constitutional right. You only need to look at the the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (Articles 6,7,8 and 9) and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966) (Articles 1,7,8,9,11,15,16 & 17) for material reference on these (our) fundamental rights that no judiciary has control and or influence over in the absence of a criminal act and or applied due process of law.
      Winning is when these civil courts & Judges etc, refuse to uphold our law and those conventions that we as a sovereign country are signatories to when they walk away (often by bogus adjournment) often done to evade their judicial responsibility and accountability.

    • @tcrookes2803
      @tcrookes2803 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      PK have never claimed to be *arbiters* of truth, (where have they said that?) they just insist on seeing evidence to back any claims. PK constantly show primary sources and evidence to back what they say. Anyone who doesn't know the difference between your & you're, shouldn't be taken as having any thinking power or rational thoughts.

    • @nicotoscani1707
      @nicotoscani1707 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@tcrookes2803 all dyslexics have no thinking power?

  • @xdc1776
    @xdc1776 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    You will never win Against The Establishment this is something my Grandad told me years ago and he was right . Best think to do is to own nothing in the first place 😂 🤷

    • @keithshippey230
      @keithshippey230 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You can only be a character with clothes on

    • @nicotoscani1707
      @nicotoscani1707 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@keithshippey230maybe there's some deeper meaning to all those nightmares we had growing up, about forgetting to put clothes on before going out to places

    • @keithshippey230
      @keithshippey230 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@nicotoscani1707everybody vulnerable with no clothes on

    • @robfloders8730
      @robfloders8730 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Why? So you would rather live in Chains? We need this information to start at a local level lose the fear ffs

    • @user-bq3og5pz9w
      @user-bq3og5pz9w 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The Crown has never in the history of England won before the king and country.

  • @anarchi108
    @anarchi108 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The peace keeper take an evidence route ? 😅 what planet do peace keepers live on? Statement by lance 😂😂😂😂 you’ve not disappointed. Laughing stock

  • @johnwantling
    @johnwantling หลายเดือนก่อน

    David doesn't go far enough. He is going around in circles. We have had a World Teacher in Jiddu Krishnamurti (Truth is a pathless land). Best listening to Krishnamurti - The challenge of change
    th-cam.com/video/lWVtovuTRE0/w-d-xo.html