Replacing taxes with tariffs: Breaking down Trump's tariff-for-tax cuts plan

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 292

  • @timmysimmons8679
    @timmysimmons8679 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    I like keeping my money. I pay more in federal taxes than I get back at the end of the year. So I'll keep more money I'm game. I don't need to fund wars. I need to fund my family

    • @believeroflight9888
      @believeroflight9888 วันที่ผ่านมา

      That's the point buddy. You will have to spend more on everything after tariff increase. America only produces high end goods and everything mundane and low end is imported. So if you are not rich, you life will remain where it was. You will have to pay more for food , clothes, appliances , cosmetics etc.

  • @latoyia-z3n
    @latoyia-z3n 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +132

    I feel investors should focus on under-the-radar stocks, considering the current rollercoaster nature of the stock market, Because 35% of my $270k portfolio comprises plummeting stocks that were once revered. I don't know where to go here out of devastation.

    • @huong-f9t
      @huong-f9t 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @nicolette-t2y Since risk is at an all-time high right now, perhaps you should be a little more patient and return when it has decreased. Alternatively, you can consult a trained financial expert for strategy.

    • @latoyia-z3n
      @latoyia-z3n 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@huong-f9t I have been considering going the same route, could you share more info please on the advisor that guides you.

    • @huong-f9t
      @huong-f9t 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@latoyia-z3n The decision on when to pick an Adviser is a very personal one. I take guidance from ‘Victoria Carmen Santaella‘ to meet my growth goals and avoid mistakes, she's well-qualified and her page can be easily found on the net.

    • @latoyia-z3n
      @latoyia-z3n 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@huong-f9t Thank you for the lead. I searched for her, and I sent her an email. I hope she gets back to me soon.

    • @kevinwysocki3182
      @kevinwysocki3182 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Just hold and if you want to buy do gold or silver

  • @eliw6607
    @eliw6607 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +42

    Tariffs are better than income tax because nobody will force me to buy the taxed goods. I am forced to pay income tax.

    • @jmar385
      @jmar385 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You know we only supposed to paid taxes to support the Civil War. We been robbed for years.

    • @ElJuanMango
      @ElJuanMango 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      You don’t buy anything manufactured outside the U.S.? What computer are you using to watch TH-cam and respond on? You and your family use cellphones right? Your car never needs parts? I hope all the farmers and food distributors use only American parts with American-mined ore. I don’t think the potential 1% tax cut will actually lead to any significant gains for you. Maybe I’m wrong…

    • @eliw6607
      @eliw6607 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @@ElJuanMango Force vs choice. I'll take choice.

    • @ElJuanMango
      @ElJuanMango 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      ⁠@@eliw6607Fair enough, choice is a luxury I’m glad we both have. You’ll probably still be forced to pay more for most goods you buy by the for-profit retailer that sells you them at higher cost, but I guess in some way that’s more favorable than the government asking the same.

    • @metrotcb9560
      @metrotcb9560 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yes you will pay tariffs if you buy anything from car parts to new cars to anything you may use every day..
      That American car most people think they bought has many many parts made in other countries.
      If you need parts for anything it may not be American.
      If you impose tariffs on other countries, make no mistake they will impose tariffs on US companies

  • @michaelmcnulty8785
    @michaelmcnulty8785 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +51

    If you’re mad about inflation, you’re going to really dislike what tariffs do.

    • @ObsidianOverload
      @ObsidianOverload 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Yeah. Its a “hold my beer” moment. Lol.

    • @fenderblue9485
      @fenderblue9485 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@ObsidianOverloadyou probably complain about gas prices 😂 just wait! You will be crying.

    • @RaysNewLife
      @RaysNewLife 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Tariffs lower domestic costs. Learn basic economics like the American School of Economics that made America rich after the civil war. Liberals need you to lack a basic education so they can keep tricking you against your own interests

    • @MarcPagan
      @MarcPagan 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Printing money and gov spending are the main sources of inflation per every economist on Earth.
      Tariffs are not the best option for sure.
      So,
      what's your plan to address Chinese subsides and zero environmental regulations, that result in de facto unfair trade?

    • @dougsholly9323
      @dougsholly9323 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@fenderblue9485 Gas prices aren't affected by tariffs, or more correctly stated, there won't be any tariffs on oil. It's this kind of ignorance that makes talking about solutions impossible. Gas prices WILL drop when Trump gets elected, and that means the price of goods will also drop.

  • @krobs151
    @krobs151 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +31

    WTF CNBC???? You have an ‘economist’ from the Heritage Foundation on here? Do you have any respect for your channel?

  • @Chasingmew
    @Chasingmew 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    This doesn’t make sense, wouldn’t higher tariff rates mean foreign companies wouldn’t want to sell their products in the United States?

    • @Kaodusanya
      @Kaodusanya หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Exactly. Things we dont make in the US will just be much more expensive. But they hope giving corporations money with reduce prices to balance out. Problem is now we have to depend on the kindness and fairness of corporations….

    • @Dillonmac96
      @Dillonmac96 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@Kaodusanyawhat if they are stuck selling to us.. like they have the factories and we have the market… who else are they going to sell to.. this is sort of an American staple like for me I can charge much more because I take the time to provide quality.. people don’t have a choice but to pay more and they don’t have a choice but to pay the tariffs and continue to supply us because we are the biggest market in the world… in trying to figure this out and every single video online is debunking trumps ideas and this is the only one where somebody says anything positive

  • @mrRambleGamble
    @mrRambleGamble 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    I'm fine paying more for items so they're made in America and provide American jobs.
    There are so many times we see a "growing economy" but it's not translating to middle class wages.

  • @SunbeamGiant
    @SunbeamGiant 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +45

    We don’t have a revenue problem, we have a spending problem

    • @robertjones2282
      @robertjones2282 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Cut spending and raise rates.

    • @IvanNano-p3o
      @IvanNano-p3o 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yet Reps under what's his name had the largest deficit increases in decades - long before Covid happened.

    • @hicrhodushicsalta6648
      @hicrhodushicsalta6648 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@robertjones2282
      Consumer spending?

    • @xxjared0571
      @xxjared0571 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@hicrhodushicsalta6648no government spending

    • @hicrhodushicsalta6648
      @hicrhodushicsalta6648 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@xxjared0571
      No paychecks?

  • @Wallabylullaby
    @Wallabylullaby 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +34

    Interviewing the Heritage Foundation? The Project 2025 guys?

    • @maureenharrington3547
      @maureenharrington3547 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Yeah…notice his red tie and blue suit uniform…coincidence??

    • @itsmejerkface
      @itsmejerkface 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes I know you guys hate hearing anying outside of your vacuum. Sorry, little man. *pat pat*

    • @TheWhitehiker
      @TheWhitehiker 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@maureenharrington3547 Please!

    • @MBarberfan4life
      @MBarberfan4life 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Also the same foundation that is still against tariffs. lol. "The Proof Is In: Tariffs Are Hurting the U.S."

    • @production58
      @production58 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Exactly ! CNBC is in the Tank for Trump

  • @Bob-kl3es
    @Bob-kl3es 23 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา +1

    No income taxes. No jewdicial supremacy

  • @HareshVaswani-k4s
    @HareshVaswani-k4s 16 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    The heritage guy is nuts. When prices were added, prices went up.

  • @MBarberfan4life
    @MBarberfan4life 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

    Tariffs are an awful idea. I don't care if Bruce Wayne is proposing tariffs.

    • @blackmcbain3145
      @blackmcbain3145 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Bruce Wayne would benefit from this almost exclusively.

    • @adambarras6566
      @adambarras6566 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Joe Biden was a terrible idea.

    • @BingBongDillyDong
      @BingBongDillyDong 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Lmao!! ​@@blackmcbain3145

    • @antthomas7916
      @antthomas7916 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      ​@@adambarras6566 Trump is also a bad idea.

    • @adambarras6566
      @adambarras6566 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@antthomas7916 we had the best economy, almost no inflation, we were energy independent, trump didn't give terrorists money and allow them to make billions of petroleum. Trump didn't start wars. There weren't buildings being set on fire by the woke. We had a secure border. You CANNOT DENY THE FACTS!!! PERIOD!

  • @pms-hd3od
    @pms-hd3od 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    The economy will collapse with this ridiculous tariff plans!!!
    Here's an idea!!!
    Corporate profits are at record highs!!!
    Why are they not paying their fair share!!!!!????
    We all benefit from the infrastructure and government run systems!!!
    Tariff plan, benefits corporate America even more !!!!
    Inflation is caused from price gouging by manufactures and corporate profit margins!

    • @billmoyer3254
      @billmoyer3254 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      that's what the dems howled in 2016. now they agree tariffs work. fair share? half of us citizens pay no income tax..

    • @c2dholla
      @c2dholla 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      As a result these corp go overseas hurting everyone so much more.

    • @itsatrap7215
      @itsatrap7215 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I think everyone is unsure of the exact ramifications of a big change in taxes like Trump's plan. But the economy would not magically collapse. Ideally I guess you want it to be a wash in tax revenue vs new tariff revenue. With the hopes that the new plan spurs manufacturing in the US cus it would be cheaper. But long term would probably need to change the plan again if manufacturing actually starts shifting back into the US. So wild idea in general.
      Corporate profits at record highs is wrong as well, some are.
      Have you seen any government run system run well that wasn't overpriced, past schedule, and worked efficiently?
      Not sure how the tariff plan benefits corporate America even more when nothing changes for them. You'll buy products and you are technically paying higher prices from tariffs. If the product or service is in/from the US, you paid less because you never paid an income tax and there was no tariff on it so it stayed the same price.
      I am not saying this tariff plan is better, but some of the things you said are wrong.

    • @GORILLAZ41
      @GORILLAZ41 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      you realize tariffs is how this country was funded all the way till 1913 and was thriving. I mean you realize we became a country just to escape taxes and now you love taxes for some reason. Makes zero sense and honestly goes against the american way

    • @kevinwysocki3182
      @kevinwysocki3182 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Wrong.... you must be skewed

  • @kevinw1090
    @kevinw1090 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    There is no dispute that whatever tariff charged will be borne by the consumers. The real question is whether imposing more tariffs will incentivize companies to set up factories in the US, and thus creating more jobs for Americans. Presuming companies will move their manufacturing base back to the US, are there enough young Americans who are willing to work in manufacturing jobs?

    • @chrislee6875
      @chrislee6875 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Great point. And no, with unemployment at 3%, and his plan to deport illegals (thus shrink 2.1% of the workforce), anyone with a 5th grade education knows what will happen. Very surprised Republicans support this...

    • @DingleBerryMilkshake
      @DingleBerryMilkshake 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      🎯
      I don't care if factory jobs paid me $50 an hour...no fkn way I'd ever want that job

  • @PeterSedesse
    @PeterSedesse 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    Imagine taking economic advice from a guy who has filed for bankruptcy 6 times and has been found guilty of fraud in 3 different businesses.

    • @petegww
      @petegww 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Which guy

    • @MarcPagan
      @MarcPagan 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      He's started over 100 businesses, and 6 went bankrupt.
      Rather impressive.

    • @billmoyer3254
      @billmoyer3254 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      bankruptcy is also to pay creditors as you can. the fraud trials are a sham. what else do you have?

    • @antthomas7916
      @antthomas7916 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@MarcPagan It's not hard to run a "successful" business when you don't pay your bills.

    • @MarcPagan
      @MarcPagan 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@antthomas7916 In poker or business...never throw good money after bad.
      Ask New Coke, TED Airlines, etc. :)

  • @thomasw4506
    @thomasw4506 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I enjoy seeing different perspectives on the issue. Really makes you think. The thing is….when I buy something, it’s my choice to buy it. I will always buy a US-made product. But again, my choice. I can choose to spend less if I want to. I would love to have tax-free income.

  • @TheBrandyMitchell
    @TheBrandyMitchell 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    National Heritage Foundation AGAIN!!!!

  • @jefflassle6994
    @jefflassle6994 11 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    E.J. Antoni from the Heritage Foundations has no clue and is entirely incorrect. All the US tariffs on China were passed through to the manufacturer, distributor, and finally to the end user one way or another. China has never paid one dime to the US on US tariffs. I've been paying duties and tariffs for over 30 years and an expert domestic and international commodity trader supplying our nation's factories, distributors, and retail operations.

  • @Plagius8
    @Plagius8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Why don't they just say it in one sentence?
    "Tariffs on goods from other countries will most certainly cause those countries to raise prices thier goods to recoup the losses from the tariffs, thereby indirectly taxing the American consumer en masse."

  • @blatant-One
    @blatant-One 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Tariffs almost ruined farmers.

  • @jimmycrackcorn99
    @jimmycrackcorn99 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Falacy #1...corporate tax rates are NOT passed on to the consumer. Prices are set based on supply and demand, NOT on a profit target.

    • @daiesison
      @daiesison 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You’re right! Apple has a 38% margin and that’s always what demand is!

    • @jimmycrackcorn99
      @jimmycrackcorn99 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @lx5xk because every market is controlled by supply and demand. If you had a business and you wanted to earn X dollars, you can't base your sell price on that. The market and what people are willing to pay for a good or service controls the price.

    • @jimmycrackcorn99
      @jimmycrackcorn99 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @lx5xk no. Taxes are determined after profit and loss is evaluated. It doesn't work backwards. You can try to go backwards but your prices probably will not be viable for the market.

    • @jimmycrackcorn99
      @jimmycrackcorn99 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @lx5xk only something like a tariff that influences the cost is part of the price. Otherwise it's not. You can try selling a $30 hamburger if that's what you need to make a certain profit, but in the end the market determines the price. It's literally Econ 101.

    • @justinforte5643
      @justinforte5643 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      If you don't have a monopoly on a necessity, any corporate tax increase will be split between an increase in your prices and a drop in your profits. The balance between the two depends on the elasticity of demand for your product

  • @KattMaroon
    @KattMaroon 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    Add in 11 million illegal immigrants; on the US and their spending spree…. They should be sued by every American

    • @acuteangle1234
      @acuteangle1234 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Absolutely

    • @jillianhudgens4316
      @jillianhudgens4316 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Are you aware that the US government gets truly of dollars every year from immigrants coming into this country or renewing their status? Guess where that money goes. On top of that, the documented illegals that are here as she paid more in taxes guess where that money goes. There has been way before Biden.

  • @metrotcb9560
    @metrotcb9560 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Yes you will pay tariffs if you buy anything from car parts to new cars to anything you may use every day..
    That American car most people think they bought has many many parts made in other countries.
    If you need parts for anything it may not be American.
    If you impose tariffs on other countries, make no mistake they will impose tariffs on US companies

  • @metrotcb9560
    @metrotcb9560 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    If you impose tariffs on other countries make no mistake they will impose tariffs on US companies.
    Tariffs encourage outsourcing jobs and less trade, economy calapse.

    • @profsherlockmoriarty
      @profsherlockmoriarty หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It just means international companies will export certain goods to Mexico and Canada and transport them into the US via USMCA.

    • @metrotcb9560
      @metrotcb9560 11 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@profsherlockmoriarty The United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) aims to create a more balanced trade agreement between the three countries, leading to economic growth and fairer trade. The USMCA is for trade between these countries only, not any other countries internationally.
      Tariffs/taxes between the USA and other countries have nothing to do with Canada or Mexico.
      If the USA imposes tariffs just to impose tariffs other countries will reciprocated

  • @leechowning2712
    @leechowning2712 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    VATs/tariffs are used by most of the 1st and 2nd world, in fact the US is one of only a few dozen nations worldwide that does not do it... and I have to look at why.
    Every nation I can think of that has the "low tariff free trade" model has a massive divide between workers and business owners, and yes that includes the US and Haiti.
    What we been doing has not worked. Perhaps listening to the rest of the worlds economists will.

    • @LoweredLine
      @LoweredLine หลายเดือนก่อน

      Interestingly enough before 1913 (the year federal income tax started) tarrifs funded the government

  • @bob___
    @bob___ 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    There's a long-standing point of view that income tax rates may reach a point of diminishing utility by reducing incentives to do business. But the US Constitution provides the Federal government with limited sources of revenue, of which the principal ones are income tax and import-export tariffs. The Federal government, unlike state governments, does not have the power to tax assets, which is why there is no billionaires' tax. Tariffs are taxes on goods, not unlike a VAT or local sales taxes. Like other taxes on goods, tariffs do not cause monetary inflation, which is a systematic reduction in currency value. Tariffs are more difficult than sales taxes to pass onto consumers, because imported goods have to compete against domestically produced goods, which don't have tariffs, and that constrains importers' ability to pass price increases along to consumers - certainly, they can't do it systematically, which is the hallmark of monetary inflation. As a result, and in view of the fiscal challenges faced by the US government, tariffs could help the US economy, especially to the extent they are not counterbalanced by income tax cuts.

  • @ArchieDanesh
    @ArchieDanesh 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    I agree with Trump, this would help out so many Americans. Me personally i don’t buy things imported from other countries that much, which i can choose to not buy stuff thats imported in the first place. I’m just tired of giving my hard earned money away to the government, the over time hours we work is all for nothing cause it gets taken away from us and thats not fair and very frustrating.

    • @curtishancock432
      @curtishancock432 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      You think you don't. But most of the parts even inside "American" companies come from abroad. You think k they are just going to eat that cost?

  • @ThomasWorthington-cb8zz
    @ThomasWorthington-cb8zz 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    May we have a sales tax replace the income tax?

  • @Jessica_PMHNP
    @Jessica_PMHNP 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

    So I don’t have to sit here and watch this whole thing, does this mean that everybody’s gonna have more of their hard earned money from their paychecks in their pockets???

  • @patriciaauricchio316
    @patriciaauricchio316 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What tax plan , we will be paying for it as innocent people…😢

  • @Joe-ey7cu
    @Joe-ey7cu 21 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

    The average worker wouldn't see more than a $10.00 increase in pay and higher prices because of tariffs would eat that up and then some.

  • @ThomasWright-n2k
    @ThomasWright-n2k หลายเดือนก่อน

    It would eventually work similarly to a flat tax and drastically disproportionately affect the lower income earners. This tariff plan is the worst one I have ever heard from a Politician.

  • @connorpena373
    @connorpena373 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Really solid discussion on tariffs but it’s very clear that the guy with glasses just doesnt like Trump.

  • @c2dholla
    @c2dholla 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    So essentially sales tax will be increased for removing income tax. I like it on paper

  • @pyreneesfarm7818
    @pyreneesfarm7818 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    The government was funded by tariffs and user fees before the income tax was proposed. There was possibly a temporary tax following the Civil war that was discontinued. What would our current governance do if the income tax was replaced with tariffs and user fees, not income taxes. There was a luxury tax placed on phone lines. since the people got more phones, the government(s) changed the name from a luxury tax to a service tax and after some time, created the 911 service to justify the tax

  • @pastramiking6874
    @pastramiking6874 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Tariffs are a good idea because they're on consumption, not from income. Also, it might incentive foreign companies to open up manufacturing plants in the US

    • @production58
      @production58 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Never happen. They won’t sacrifice jobs in their own countries to build crap here in the US..Cars are the exception

    • @Kaodusanya
      @Kaodusanya หลายเดือนก่อน

      So what you want is austerity imposed by higher prices thanks to tariffs

    • @takistanirefugee3079
      @takistanirefugee3079 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@production58To retain the US market? I think you underestimate foreign companies’ patriotism

    • @takistanirefugee3079
      @takistanirefugee3079 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@production58*overestimate

  • @jancurtis9670
    @jancurtis9670 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Jason Furman makes sense. All goods will be more expensive because of higher tariffs. Common Sense!!

  • @markwiegard8384
    @markwiegard8384 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    One thing no one is mentioning here is a balance budget. If you reduce government spending you wouldn’t need the other corporate 7%.
    Lower taxes cut spending and F’n learn how to budget spending what you receive! If you don’t have the cash you don’t buy!

  • @AndrewUnruh
    @AndrewUnruh หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Clearly, this is a massive transfer of wealth from the poor and middle class who desperately need the money to the wealthy who don't.

  • @user-raba
    @user-raba 17 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    Just let me do some simple math: US import volume is about 3.2 trillion - if one applies suggested 10 … 20% tariffs, you‘ll get about 600 billion (max) additional income, right? Well, tax cuts may cost what? 4 trillion? So, I calculate a remaining gap of 3.4 trillion, which is not yet financed. Simple question: how much the GDP must grow (job growth), to add additional 3.4 trillion (with lowered taxes)? Actual GDP is approximately 29 trillion, this results in roughly 4 trillion tax income. It means, US would need to nearly double GDP to finance remaining gap of tax cuts. Sounds fairly unrealistic … it would mean a drastic increase in US deficit. This would result in inflation. US government and we tax payers have no tax problem, but a spending problem, aren‘t we?

    • @fmanion24
      @fmanion24 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Government cuts. First $70 billion on foreign aid cut the irs another $17 billion. Just make some cuts

    • @user-raba
      @user-raba 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@fmanion24 okay, we have one drop in the ocean … the first 2.5% … 97.5% remaining gap. Ideas?

  • @richardghormley5995
    @richardghormley5995 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have a silly idea! How about the Government stop wasting tax payer money and balance our budget!

  • @MarcPagan
    @MarcPagan 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    As one with an econ background, I'm not a fan of tariffs.
    I'm open alternative solutions.
    How to address China's subsides of industry, and essentially zero environmental regulations,
    ..that eliminate fair and real competition?

  • @etiennesauve3386
    @etiennesauve3386 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The thing is: corporate profit translate most of the time by shareholder profit. This Trump Tax is just a wealth transfer, taking from middle class and giving to "shareholder" class increasing, by doing so, wealth inequality.

  • @gregjones8833
    @gregjones8833 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I'm so embarrassed for us. This reminds me of the early 2000's on the Climate Change topic where there would be 50% of the screen would be one person representing the science of climate change (that 99% of scientists agreed with) and 50% of the screen that a Climate Change denier would be given equal time.
    If 90% of economists think that tariffs are bad, at least a larger number of guests that represent that (2:1 or 3:1 would be enough - if that is correct) and come with Economic evidence.
    Economics is data driven, and stock trading is easily discussed using data/numbers. Know your viewers and show the data - embarrassing how we are still dumbing down these topics even on a stage where the audience can easily understand the data.

  • @golfgrouch
    @golfgrouch 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This makes you wonder what Northern Illinois University is teaching to their students.

  • @williammarthe9619
    @williammarthe9619 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    I’m not worried , Trump was in office before with the same policies , I started making more money and bought a house .

    • @teebone2157
      @teebone2157 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      2% tax cut bought you a house?????

    • @williammarthe9619
      @williammarthe9619 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@teebone2157 Yes , I bought a house and the company I worked for started investing and growing the company , I got a promotion and a $18000 a year raise the second year Trump was in office ! It has been stagnant the past 3 years .

    • @jps101574
      @jps101574 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yes. But interest rates were much lower. That has nothing to do with Trump

    • @williammarthe9619
      @williammarthe9619 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jps101574 The company I worked for over ten years started investing in the company and I got a promotion , $18000 per year increase with at least 10000 more in overtime the second year Of the Trump administration and yes 3.5 % interest rate did help a lot especially in California !

  • @divineknowledge4607
    @divineknowledge4607 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Trump 2024!

  • @rreinhardt2393
    @rreinhardt2393 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    I'd love to take much higher price for no income tax return. Tax code is just a joke.

  • @banditonehundred
    @banditonehundred 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hopefully things get more expensive and people go on a spending diet. The idea about building an economy on money printing and credit is a problem

  • @gianni-bull
    @gianni-bull 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Imagine being so gullible that a billionaire real estate mogul makes you believe that reducing corporate tax rates and introducing tariffs is somehow in YOUR interest / better for YOUR pocket 😂

    • @MarcPagan
      @MarcPagan 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Imagine not researching before making a fool of oneself.

    • @billmoyer3254
      @billmoyer3254 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      it is if you invest and save. ok millenial?

    • @theGefilteFist
      @theGefilteFist 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Imagine a world without this vapid, pretentious formulation

  • @AndrewAAndersonPMP
    @AndrewAAndersonPMP 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Jason is correct…

    • @Davjose37
      @Davjose37 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No he’s not

  • @divineknowledge4607
    @divineknowledge4607 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Democrats talking about how to do anything financial is a laughable comedy skit!!

    • @RTHOM0316
      @RTHOM0316 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I take economic advice from the guy with six bankruptcies.

  • @acuteangle1234
    @acuteangle1234 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    VOTE FOR WHO LESSENS OUR TAX. WE DO NOT WANT TO PAY FOR THE RICH AND POOR ANYMORE.

  • @barbartel9398
    @barbartel9398 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    STOP SPENDING!!!!

  • @rosswatkins2277
    @rosswatkins2277 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Huh? So, let's talk about what's in effect right now. And the high prices I'm paying for everything. Can y'all talk about that

  • @cloudyskyyy100
    @cloudyskyyy100 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Does this mean food as well? Or things like cars or houses? Or just luxury items like tvs toys ect

  • @BmoreBetterNOW
    @BmoreBetterNOW 13 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

    What would end up happening is that we would slowly begin to purchase more made in the U.S. products which would be equivalent to the goods prices coming from overseas (otherwise the foreign goods wouldn’t sell here). The foreign companies would price their products to be competitive in OUR American markets.
    So long term U.S. companies grow & expand & hire more people with decent wages. Then those workers (able to keep more of their $$) would be able to buy more.
    Also YES - Elon would run his governmental efficiency audit to crackdown on all the wasteful spending.
    I think people still pretend that Trump is stupid & doesn’t know what he’s doing. Obviously tariff’s would NOT be levied on every good that comes into the country - honestly everything would be looked at on a case by case basis. I.e. if China is making a 1000% profit in the U.S. for selling a DVD player and an American company can only make a 300% profit … YES that would be a good on which to add a tariff & China’s profits would have to equalize closer to that of a U.S. company IF they want to sell products in our country.

  • @AndrewAAndersonPMP
    @AndrewAAndersonPMP 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Yes, we do. We have less revenue. This is why we have debt.

  • @uptone12111
    @uptone12111 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Was jason zooming from the bathroom?

  • @Chuck-js8dy
    @Chuck-js8dy 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I’m now certainly voting Trump

    • @quytones7355
      @quytones7355 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Me too. Former democrat. Sick of being gas lit.

  • @84KtnM
    @84KtnM 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If duties on good getting imported into the US go up...then retail price will be up.
    If duties on exports go up.... Retail Prices will go down, also corporate profits for exporters go down too. Export Industry could shrink a bit. ....Less Gold into US if it were the 20s.
    Tax on citizens should be Low, rather Minimum Pay should be linked to inflation as closely as possible.

    • @theGefilteFist
      @theGefilteFist 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Do you not see how that would create an even more direct feedback loop, so 2 speak?

  • @petegww
    @petegww 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Make it all in America and there is no tariff!

    • @roberto50325
      @roberto50325 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Have you used american made products?

    • @petegww
      @petegww 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @roberto50325 I will when they onshore their production to avoid the tariffs!
      Oh yeah and it brings jobs back, what a great idea.

    • @steveguillory7568
      @steveguillory7568 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      And raises the price on products. You good with that?

    • @petegww
      @petegww 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@steveguillory7568 it's already raised genius, America can make goods on these prices and create jobs.

    • @steveguillory7568
      @steveguillory7568 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@petegww if you think prices are high now, just wait genius.

  • @fenderblue9485
    @fenderblue9485 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    INFLATION will go UP!

  • @kevinwysocki3182
    @kevinwysocki3182 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Keep state tax for state services but get ride of federal.

  • @GTA_500
    @GTA_500 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Them soybean farmers are ready.

  • @bryanwarmuth6434
    @bryanwarmuth6434 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    is he suggesting foreign companies pay tax inn the usa I don't think thats how it works if it did they would have no reason to produce products overseas

  • @samreynolds3789
    @samreynolds3789 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Timmy
    Funding for ENDLESS WARS will CONTINUE ! OUR ITEMS from : Forks - Vehicles, etc….. WILL COST A LOT MORE

  • @AndrewAAndersonPMP
    @AndrewAAndersonPMP 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    WTF is the Heritage guy talking about. He is clueless.

  • @GTA_500
    @GTA_500 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ask them soybean farmers.

  • @ElectronEntanglement
    @ElectronEntanglement 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    These people at this news network are clueless. Omg. Now do Biden…. Oh wait… you can’t.

  • @samreynolds3789
    @samreynolds3789 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Sooooo ITEMS FROM _____ WILL COST US ( Poor / DWINDLING Middle Classes !👎🏽🤬

  • @alpine9996
    @alpine9996 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I’d rather have the choice of buying a product and pay the “tariff/tax” or not buying the product. If I’m “Taxed” by lower pay, or lower dividends I don’t have that choice. If I don’t purchase that Chinese tariffed made product they will usually lower the price. If they do, I win because of the lower taxes and America wins

  • @senorflowers
    @senorflowers 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    So he’s lowering taxes for corporations so that ppl can pay higher taxes.. got it

    • @mrmanoriginaltakes
      @mrmanoriginaltakes 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You need to listen and understand

    • @senorflowers
      @senorflowers 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@mrmanoriginaltakes I did.. that’s what the rational guy said as opposed to the republican corporate puppet that want to give corporations a tax break so that everyone else can pay higher taxes said. It sounds like you didn’t listen and understand

    • @senorflowers
      @senorflowers 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@mrmanoriginaltakes what part of tariffs are a tax on the consumer don’t YOU understand? Go look up the speech that where Trump told his billionaire donors that he would lower their taxes.. sounds like YOU need to actually listen and understand

    • @mrmanoriginaltakes
      @mrmanoriginaltakes 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@senorflowers listen with your ears and respond with your mind after you have digested the information. You are emotional right now!

    • @senorflowers
      @senorflowers 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@mrmanoriginaltakes I’m assuming you’re a trumper/cult member since you’re telling me to do mental gymnastics to “understand” what Trump meant to say.. again.. why don’t YOU go read what Trump said and his tax plan and tell me that it makes sense. Literally no economist say it’s good

  • @Mostly_bad
    @Mostly_bad 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I thought Republicans cared about deficits?

    • @posthocprior
      @posthocprior 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      The GOP removed any mention to deficits or a balanced budget from their platform at this year's convention.

    • @volfancp
      @volfancp 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Right. Then why did deficits GO UP to record levels under Trump???

    • @MarcPagan
      @MarcPagan 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Lower tax rates = more tax revenue
      ..to a point.
      Research finds 18% to be the best income tax rate per the Laffer Curve.

    • @dougsholly9323
      @dougsholly9323 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@volfancp Covid. Did you forget about that? Without 2020, his spending was pretty much in line with Obama's and Joetato's deficits. Go look up the numbers by year for yourself. And if you want to get technical, while trump did sign them, the left's congress/senate spent the money. The left forced everyone to stay home which created the apparent need for the government to mail out checks. I won't let Trump entirely off the hook, but most of that is the democrat's fault.

    • @tiz6549
      @tiz6549 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      You thought Trump 1.0 8 years was bad!
      Trump 2.0 2nd term will be on steroids! 😮😮

  • @randyhilliard6343
    @randyhilliard6343 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thats why you produce in the united states

  • @javierfhi62
    @javierfhi62 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This guy said not a single fact

  • @VovaLuke
    @VovaLuke 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You need both. As a income tax can supplement trade. And economy. For the ta ride to work. What if their is a r suc s line of sp nsing their will be a panic like a stock market. This income tax is reliable, but a ta off is c optical/necessary for the government to keep up with the gdp.

    • @VovaLuke
      @VovaLuke 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Simple put, tariff is their for the government to keep up with the gdp.

  • @OhioVworld
    @OhioVworld 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Yes, we need to mandate higher wages and lower returns for investors- we agree.
    The old school GOPers are dinosaurs….

  • @Mwesi
    @Mwesi 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    trickle up economics

  • @trentpetersen3072
    @trentpetersen3072 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Headed towards economic disaster.

  • @FIBONICITY
    @FIBONICITY 2 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Inflation

  • @DougGonda
    @DougGonda 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Heritage guy arguing that corporations don’t pay taxes and then argues that tariffs will be paid for by foreign corporations. Which is it?

  • @bobdoe38
    @bobdoe38 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    One guy looks like he just got off work from a meat packing plant. The other guy looks like a professor. I know which I believe 😂

  • @sandymarchena3837
    @sandymarchena3837 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Trump ❤

  • @production58
    @production58 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Again…He’s from the freakin Heritage Foundation !! A nightmare !

  • @rjdn7932
    @rjdn7932 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Rocket scientists you are not... don't buy foreign made, American made = no tariffs d'oh

  • @BRuane-pw6xq
    @BRuane-pw6xq 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The Heritage Guy . WTF 😂😂😂

  • @lonnieyancer3256
    @lonnieyancer3256 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Yeah bc corporations share their profits with anyone but themselves

  • @briane4975
    @briane4975 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    BS dude! Corporations do not lower prices on good and services because they have a lower tax rate. Jesus such a tool! They may pay themselves more and they benefit from their share price going up.

  • @crazyfox5858
    @crazyfox5858 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Love when EJ (Heritage Foundation person) says 'economics say' without citing anyone. Classic Neo Republicans playbook. And the dem fell for it. Classic glass jawed Democrat.

  • @Hawking1969
    @Hawking1969 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    sooo predictable.

  • @xxxyyy-h4w
    @xxxyyy-h4w 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    LOL ...

  • @jancurtis9670
    @jancurtis9670 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    E. J. is from the Heritage Foundation. Oh, NO!!!

  • @DingleBerryMilkshake
    @DingleBerryMilkshake 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Any given Chinese trinket TODAY:
    $1.00
    IF DonOld gets back in the WH:
    Same trinket $2.00
    Any questions?

  • @thomasw4506
    @thomasw4506 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I enjoy seeing different perspectives on the issue. Really makes you think. The thing is….when I buy something, it’s my choice to buy it. I will always buy a US-made product. But again, my choice. I can choose to spend less if I want to. I would love to have tax-free income.