Battle of the Submariners - Rolex vs SteelDive Showdown & Comparison!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 มิ.ย. 2023
  • Support the channel & get your Steeldive here - s.click.aliexpress.com/e/_mtd...
    Hey there everyone!
    Thanks to Mr Z, I have been able to do a side-side comparison of the Rolex Submariner Date Model Ref 126610LN vs the SteelDive SD1953 Homage Watch.
    Now..before the Rolex fanboys set a lynching squad out for me...this is merely a side-by-side comparison...it's designed to show each watch for what it is...in saying that, the price difference as you would know ...is massive! The Rolex Submariner at retail, if you can get it, which you cant anyway, would set you back just over $15k AUD, whereas the Steeldive is readily available & can be had for just over $100 AUD. Of course, finishing is far superior on the Rolex & in the hand, you can tell it's superior...but....does that mean the Rolex is better....Yes & No...of course it's better quality...but on the value ratio, the Steeldive is the clear winner in this regard.
    Anyway, I hope that you enjoy the video, if you do like the content then please consider subscribing & liking. Your support is greatly appreciated!
    Thanks & see you in the next video soon!
    Al
    #homagewatch #watchreview #rolexvshomage
  • แนวปฏิบัติและการใช้ชีวิต

ความคิดเห็น • 238

  • @pzwolski
    @pzwolski ปีที่แล้ว +151

    100 times more expensive, not even twice better.

    • @thetruthhurts7500
      @thetruthhurts7500 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Moron

    • @Edward1312
      @Edward1312 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      The World has gone crazy! The law of diminishing return personified.

    • @MyName-nx1jj
      @MyName-nx1jj 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Personified? @@Edward1312

    • @user-dr8gw5zs5x
      @user-dr8gw5zs5x 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Rolex resell value is 100 times better too 😂

    • @pzwolski
      @pzwolski 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@user-dr8gw5zs5x I am not a watch flipper.

  • @victormorgan1690
    @victormorgan1690 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    in my opinion, as I have been down the premium brand road, then after I bought my second Steeldive which was the sd1953 smurf. I then sold the big-brand dive watches because I realized it was too much money as appose to trying to impress others I only needed to tell the time and for me at least impress myself I liked the watch.SD1953 off which from then on was the philosophy of my future watch collection.

    • @TheWatchChannelAU
      @TheWatchChannelAU  ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Much the same position I ended up at...I am happy with myself and what I wear...no need to impress anyone else!

    • @gregsmith7821
      @gregsmith7821 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Agreed, if I like the look of a watch, having to wait years and devote months of work to own it is a pain in the bum. Much nicer to order it on line for less than a days wages and receive it within a week. Same look, similar performance, no worries.❤

    • @TheWatchChannelAU
      @TheWatchChannelAU  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thanks so much

    • @johncarter6238
      @johncarter6238 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@TheWatchChannelAU I find a Rolex Sub date of 10,700 new at the dealer. a major theft, how crazy are you if you buy this. a SteelDive or San Martin costs 300. Steel is steel and sapphire glass, the material costs are not far apart. you pay 9000 too much just for the rolex name and the super fame. nothing more or less

  • @Miclantechupi
    @Miclantechupi 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

    And best thing, you can wear the SD on a night out in London, and not only will no-one know the difference, but if some new arrval sticks a knife in your face, you can just throw it at him and you have lost less than a round of drinks....

    • @johntate5050
      @johntate5050 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      I remember when London was considered to be one of the safest big cities in the world. Thank you to diversity for putting an end to that.

    • @probie2460
      @probie2460 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      New arrival! Hahaha

    • @crybabychrononaut
      @crybabychrononaut หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@johntate5050 Wokeness in action

  • @GunGuy258
    @GunGuy258 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    So, the $100.00 steeldive has bezel lume and not the high dollar Rolex? Thats insane!

    • @soyman5392
      @soyman5392 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Chinese watches offering more value per dollar 😳

  • @michaelanthony5441
    @michaelanthony5441 ปีที่แล้ว +37

    I bought 3 of the Steeldive, love the look, Seiko movement, feel and lume! Of course anyone who bought one wants a Rolex but, when it comes to price (retail and otherwise )and wait is a challenge.. thank for the deep dive of the iconic Rolex Submariner , just makes me appreciate my Steeldives even more. Especially that lume. One of the best value for money.

    • @agprime
      @agprime 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      I don’t want a Rolex I personally believe Swiss watches are overrated especially Rolex, you pay so much just for a brand you can get cheaper watches with way better specs, one can argue that they polish their movements to high standard but who is opening their watch to show their movements? It’s a waste of money and if I had all the money in the world I’ll still not buy a Rolex.

    • @profound369
      @profound369 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ​@@agprimeI dislike rolex so much I would spend money to petition OTHER PEOPLE to not buy them! FR FR

  • @TheRealMurKziLLa
    @TheRealMurKziLLa 6 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    The video and audio are tip notch. Those close-up and panning shots were very nice and crisp. The clicking the watch made when spinning the bezel was very satisfying. Would definitely make for some good asmr, lol.

  • @howieportal
    @howieportal ปีที่แล้ว +21

    One of the best watch comparisons that i have seen. Nothing missed here. Well done.!! 👍

  • @dm1523
    @dm1523 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    Just got my SD1953 today. Easy to adjust the links. Just a great watch. Great value to price. Your video here is what tipped me to go ahead and get one. So glad I did. Thank you!

    • @TheWatchChannelAU
      @TheWatchChannelAU  ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Sorry for enabling you!! Ahhaah hope you enjoy it mate!

  • @detlefstreibel2151
    @detlefstreibel2151 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Diese minimale Unterschiede rechtfertigen niemals den hohen Preis der Rolex. Ich habe eine Invicta Pro Diver Automatik mit einer Gangabweichung von +- 3 Sekunden am Tag und bin hoch zu frieden

  • @anastasiospapatsoris5326
    @anastasiospapatsoris5326 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    I got a Steeldive SD1954 on a rubber strap and it is such a cool tool dive watch, pretty much what Rolex used to be in the 50s, 60s and 70s.

    • @thetruthhurts7500
      @thetruthhurts7500 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I cant believe how ridiculous these comments are...

    • @anastasiospapatsoris5326
      @anastasiospapatsoris5326 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Sometimes, truth hurts indeed. Take my word as a skipper and a diver, Steeldive serves its purpose right.

    • @thegorn
      @thegorn 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      It's actually far better than what Rolex was in the 50's - 70's. Rolex of that era now let me see... hollow end links, aluminium bezel inserts, plexiglass, rattly bracelets, and they often leaked (various Military forces ditched them due to failure rates). Rolex is a case of "stick a crown logo on your dial and crown and fake it till you make it". Thankfully for Rolex they had iconic designs, and were able to improve quality iteratively that by the 2000's they actually started to get decent.

    • @anastasiospapatsoris5642
      @anastasiospapatsoris5642 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      well said! @@thegorn

    • @panorama4526
      @panorama4526 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Complete nonsense. Spend your money on garbage if you want.

  • @ThePedroDB
    @ThePedroDB 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I've never owned a Rolex but I have no desire to spend that much on a watch. I'd never want to wear it for fear of damage or theft. I do like the look of the Sub though. Hence, my SD1953 has been my daily wearer for 6 months now. It keeps good time @ +2s/day. A number of people have complimented me on it. I've even had Rolex wearers strike up a conversation thinking I was a fellow owner - I soon put that straight.. 😇
    One thing I have learned is that macro views of watches in reviews have little bearing on seeing them in person/on wrist. None of those minutae are even visible to the naked eye. Furthermore, the only people who typically comment on watches are watch nerds - the rest of the world couldn't care less.
    Bottom line? Buy what you like and what makes you happy. However, the reality is that the SD1953 is everybit as good as the Rolex, most of the time (no pun intended..). If having a status symbol on your arm is important to you then nothing but the genuine item will do. For everyone else, forget about your kids inheriting your Rolex. Invest the money wisely for 20-30 years instead and give them a pot of cash to do as they please. You could buy 10x SD1953s for the price of a Rolex service...

  • @ricardonercolini6053
    @ricardonercolini6053 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    I love the Steeldive 1953. I got the "Smurf", the "Hulk", the "Kermit" and the black one. Fantastic watch. I am using the Hulk right now!

    • @SalvatoreDiazManrique
      @SalvatoreDiazManrique 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What Is better? Black, Green/ Green (Hulk) or Green/black (Kermit)?

  • @jsenear
    @jsenear 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    I ordered my Steeldive green bezel/black face (I guess they call them Kermits) on Sept 2 from Ali Express. It is now the 7th and it is being delivered today. That is an amazing delivery time from Asia. I have the Captain Williard as well and it was keeping nearly perfect time. Dropped it on the bathroom's hard tile floor and now it's running 80 seconds fast a day. I can live with that because when I wind it I can just adjust the time. All in all, you get one hell of a watch with Steeldive.

    • @drewthomas3573
      @drewthomas3573 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I bought mine over the summer same Kermit. Lume, look, everything screams beautuful well made watch. Seiko movement guarantees excellent movement quality. We should start a Kermit Club. :-))))

    • @cemdrahsan270
      @cemdrahsan270 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They call them Starbucks..

  • @moisturisedgnome1181
    @moisturisedgnome1181 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Been looking at the SD1953 for a while now, & i just pulled the trigger on a kermit for 80 english pounds. Feel stupid not to, given what everyone is saying about this watch

  • @Rhamirezz85
    @Rhamirezz85 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I have this watch, Steeldive with black bezel, first watch I bought on Ali, first time buying anything there frankly. Watch excided my expectations, the level of finish and assembly is amazing!! In my country Seikos are now 4x more expensive than Steeldive... Let's say this is not my last watch I bought on Ali ;)

  • @funland108
    @funland108 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I’ve got the Steeldive GMT Coke. I’m seriously impressed with it. Fairly accurately tells the time, 300m water resistance, and looks like the real thing from even quite close up. Best of all I get a ceramic Coke which Rolex have refused to make. Downsides are the lume on the hands is weak, it’s quite heavy, some of the edges are a bit sharp, and the cyclops is over-magnified. But overall I love it. It’s Bling Without The Sting!

  • @robertbamford6567
    @robertbamford6567 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    From wearing gold Breitlings , Rolex and JLC I now wear daily an Addisdive quartz GMT Deepsea Hunter that was recommended on your channel. It’s a beautiful watch for 40 something quid. I wised up a long time ago to the Swiss luxury watch industry. A complete rip off. The Chinese are getting better at it and it’s brilliant. Good comparison review

  • @DamianceteVideos
    @DamianceteVideos ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Steeldive with a slimmer rehaut, and light grey numbers on the bezel would be excellent.

  • @stuartkennedy4570
    @stuartkennedy4570 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I have had the steel dive now for over a year. Still looks like new. And I wear it most days. My father in law has the Rolex and they are almost identical even the weight.

  • @realwarriorscholar
    @realwarriorscholar 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I have a moderate collection and would like to eventually put a Rolex into it - probably an Explorer MK1. Homages offer the look and feel without the worry of loss or theft. But I totally understand the desire for a premium movement and materials.

    • @Edward1312
      @Edward1312 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      You can get premium movement and materials in plenty of watches below $1000, try a Seiko for example.

  • @SantiagoAyoso
    @SantiagoAyoso 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Im very Happy with my Steeldive 1953. Thanks for the video 👍🏻

  • @parallelsuns1
    @parallelsuns1 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I recently bought an SD1953 for £60 and its really impressive, no sharp edges or anything, well finished, keeps time its just the cyclops is not the best but thats the only gripe I have with it

  • @marklofthouse6244
    @marklofthouse6244 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    Two great watches. Rolex is simply pricing itself out of most markets.

    • @thetruthhurts7500
      @thetruthhurts7500 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Rolex doesn't want to be in any of those markets...Steeldive is a piece of crap as a dive watch....

    • @petejung3122
      @petejung3122 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Rolex is for buyers as an investment.
      Not to really wear the watch, just on occasions.
      I'm not that type....

    • @gregsmith7821
      @gregsmith7821 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@thetruthhurts7500I'm genuinly interested in your comment about the steeldive being a piece of crap as a dive watch. Have you used it for any diving and if so, why the disapointment?

    • @borealranger9763
      @borealranger9763 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      A Rolex went from being a nice watch bought for its timekeeping purposes and durability/pressure rating to a Veblen good that is sought after exactly because it is more expensive than its use might indicate.

    • @marklofthouse6244
      @marklofthouse6244 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Have dived with two of their dive watches.: The standard size and the Sea Dweller version. They worked flawlessly.

  • @AbandonedRaven
    @AbandonedRaven หลายเดือนก่อน

    A little late, but with the NH35 movement, you could probably switch out the dial as well with some custom ones online and you still have a nice case. Same with the movement being replaced, as mentioned in the video. Even though I don’t necessarily need the lume, I do like how the Steeldive did it on the bezel as well. Great video and comparison!

  • @bobjosephs
    @bobjosephs 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I recently bought a Steeldive 1953 in blue. I am very pleased with the watch. I own gen Omega, Rolex and Cartier along with Dan Henry, Seiko, and Orient watches. The Steeldive is amazingly close in overall quality to the genuine. It did have a fairly stiff bezel but it loosened up in use. The clasp is now milled and it has 6 micro adjusts. The SD 1953 is probably 95% there. The only issue now is the cyclops which is over magnified. I think the reason is the crystal is higher than the dial then in the genuine. The rehaut is also thicker.

  • @migfed
    @migfed ปีที่แล้ว

    Great review with great insights

  • @hitsugayat10
    @hitsugayat10 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Steeldive makes great watches. I have the Starbucks and the full black GMT from them and it is awesome for the price. Just lacking a lil bit when it comes to bracelet quality as compared with Pagani IMO but for the quality and build of the watch head, that is where the savings from bracelet goes to.

  • @finophile
    @finophile ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for a good review.

  • @soggz4246
    @soggz4246 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I have a Steeldive ‘Captain Willard’.
    It is a fantastic watch for the price, and I am literally waiting for my Steeldive ‘Sub’ to fall through the door,as I ordered one last Friday.
    Great comparison review. Would love to see one on the Rolex and Steeldive Explorer 2, as I am interested in that one,as my next timepiece.
    All the best 👍🏾🇬🇧

    • @thegorn
      @thegorn 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I have it as well. There's no need to even say "for the price" - it's just a fantastic watch full stop.

    • @funland108
      @funland108 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I have the Steeldive Coke GMT and the black Explorer 2. Love them both but the Explorer has black hands - like the white one - when it should have chrome hands. It’s a bit more stealth and tool-looking so works as more of a daily around the house.

  • @bjw4859
    @bjw4859 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I have been looking at the SD1970 but now I have another choice, crap, oh well, but interesting to see the quality of Steeldive " tribute ' watches overall.

  • @zorgonfire
    @zorgonfire 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    10x for the review. Ordered one. The finishing is perfect and I prefer the flexible (not perfect) bracelet compared to my swiss watches. Needs a small adjustment as its running -10s a day wirh a 1.3ms beat error.

    • @TheWatchChannelAU
      @TheWatchChannelAU  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks man! Have a cracking Xmas!!

  • @BushCampingTools
    @BushCampingTools 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I love that, "the Rolex fan boys" LMAO! Great video.

  • @1972myc
    @1972myc 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    (#1)I love this video and all your videos. There is contradiction on TH-cam about the UV coatings. Some say UV coating on the Steeldive but not on the Rolex, several videos in fact. On a different subject I seen imperfections on aligents on the Rolex. I could Never, Never, afford a real Rolex. But I see by review videos that I am not really missing out much.

  • @TheBimmer74
    @TheBimmer74 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I own the Steeldive and it's a gem

    • @thetruthhurts7500
      @thetruthhurts7500 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I'm so sorry

    • @TheBimmer74
      @TheBimmer74 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @thetruthhurts7500 I'm not its a great beater watch for when I don't want to wear my Omega Seamaster

  • @toddbilleci8563
    @toddbilleci8563 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thank you

    • @TheWatchChannelAU
      @TheWatchChannelAU  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That's a pleasure mate...hope you enjoyed it

  • @gandhabba69
    @gandhabba69 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Hello need your help mister, with a comparison not so huge like this one. im between this steeldive 1953 automatic or the addiesdive my-h3 quartz, can you help me decide if the price diference is better to go with what watch.
    Just want the best for the money❤ best regards

    • @TheWatchChannelAU
      @TheWatchChannelAU  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Depends on what is important..if you just want a good watch but are not bothered about automatic then the quartz will serve you well. On the other hand, if you want something that is mechanical then the 1953 is a solid option...at the end of the day..both are good options depending on your specific needs

  • @tonyh4233
    @tonyh4233 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Pleasure watching you, great review nice macro, subscribed

  • @Mr26Huffy
    @Mr26Huffy 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have the Steeldive. I like it a lot. I run a Nato strap with the TGV Casio mod on the strap.

  • @TenNiepokorny
    @TenNiepokorny 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I have bought steeldive as a Rolex placeholder until I am able to buy it. Honestly the quality is so good that I started to question the whole Rolex purchase idea...🤑

  • @agprime
    @agprime 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I have a 1953 steeledive and I love it, it runs at +5 sec day.

  • @WATCH-4U
    @WATCH-4U 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    1953s are fantastic value for money sub homages ...got the black on black and kermit love them both....

  • @RJ986S
    @RJ986S 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Nice report, just liked & subscribed.

  • @Ott0vonBismarck
    @Ott0vonBismarck 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    please compare the Cronos submariner l6005 with the Rolex!! would love to hear your thoughts

  • @RekoneInkings
    @RekoneInkings 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    You can have rhis same watch on a Miyota movement too, that makes it even cheaper (about 36€ on sale) and the looks and durability are still there 😊

  • @davidcrandall4958
    @davidcrandall4958 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Please compare an Invicta submariner to these watches!

  • @iron883cd
    @iron883cd 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    me again, i just got the gray version, wonder if you have that one???, maybe make a video comparison between the black and the grey

    • @TheWatchChannelAU
      @TheWatchChannelAU  7 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      @@iron883cd yeah, I need to get that one...looks nice

  • @petervernelen6784
    @petervernelen6784 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thanks for the video, my only concern is if the 41mm steeldive wouldn't be to small for my 7.4 inch wrist

    • @TheWatchChannelAU
      @TheWatchChannelAU  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I doubt it

    • @funland108
      @funland108 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I have a 7.5 inch wrist. Both my Steeldive 41mm’s look great. Neither too big nore too small.

  • @King64
    @King64 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Super video 👍❤️

  • @adk7962
    @adk7962 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    I think most people who can afford a Rolex are smart enough (maybe) to understand that a Rolex is not 125 times better than a Chinese Homage. But that’s not why they buy them. They buy them because they can. And honestly if I was in their shoes, I’m not sure I would do anything differently. Thanks for the great comparison! Also if a Steeldive is this close, what’s a San Martin like in comparison?

    • @thegorn
      @thegorn 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      When you have money to burn, you burn money. Also the more expensive they are, the more attractive they are to the super rich. That's called a "veblen good", where the standard rules of supply and demand don't apply. What's sad is where lower income people foolishly play the game and give up their hard-earned for a Rolex and get in over their heads. If you have a Rolex - seriously no one cares.

    • @adk7962
      @adk7962 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@thegorn no truer words have been spoken sir. 👍🏼

  • @Chris-rt8rq
    @Chris-rt8rq ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Can somebody correct me if I’m wrong? I saw this steel dive on Amazon’s website and the description does indicate the watch does have AR coating. I saw numerous reviews of submariner’s and all the reviewers claim that Rolex does not put AR coating on its watches. Maybe I’m mixed up.

    • @TheWatchChannelAU
      @TheWatchChannelAU  ปีที่แล้ว

      Well mate, that confuses the hell out of me then! The Submariner was absolutely clearer than the SteelDive.

  • @LuizUriGodoy
    @LuizUriGodoy 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    has the two watches, if you live in a big city, rolex to use in feel moments and the steeldive to use every day.

  • @Edward1312
    @Edward1312 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Gibson is the Rolex and Steel dive is the Squire equivalent in the guitar world. 10 times more for struggling to be twice better. Law of diminishing returns kicks in big time.

    • @johntate5050
      @johntate5050 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I always remember browsing for guitars back in the 80s. I was trying all the guitars I drooled over. Things like American Strats, Gibsons SGs and Les Pauls,. then I picked up a Japanese Washburn for a fraction of the price. I couldn't believe how much better it felt and sounded. Despite being better in every way than the American icons I told myself I was just imagining it. How could a cheap Japanese Washburn be better than the mighty Fenders and Gibsons that all the iconic rockers played? I couldn't afford the Fenders or Gibsons but I could have stretched to the Washburn but I didn't buy it because I was in denial. Fast-forward 40 years and I now know the Japanese guitars back then were far better than the American stuff but at the time I was blinded by branding and marketing. I learnt a valuable lesson.

  • @antonclaudiovecchietti9488
    @antonclaudiovecchietti9488 ปีที่แล้ว

    Un confronto impari! Ma Steeldive 1954, può essere una buona soluzione, per chi non si può permettere di acquistare un Rolex Submariner. Cordiali saluti 😊

  • @davidcrandall4958
    @davidcrandall4958 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    other reviews say the SteelDive does have a AR Coating!

    • @frosty97
      @frosty97 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Depends on the model. I have 5 different Steeldive watches and 3 of them have a AR coating. The other 2 have not! Those without AR did cost under 200€ and the other with AR where over 200€ 😅

  • @relightlighting
    @relightlighting 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great down to earth review!
    How's the weight compared to the Rolex though? I like a heavy watch to feel I'm wearing something if that makes sense.

    • @TheWatchChannelAU
      @TheWatchChannelAU  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I get that mate, it's lighter imho but not cheaper light if that makes sense?

    • @thegorn
      @thegorn 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Buy the white-gold Rolex Submariner - that will be plenty heavy :)

  • @multipl3
    @multipl3 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I think people forget the bulk of the cost of any watch is the movement. And of course the luxury materials like white gold indices that go into Rolex that gives it a striking look a homage will never achieve. Ceramic is ceramic but it’s hard to match the rest of a Rolex

    • @thegorn
      @thegorn 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      In the era of smartphones that doesn't really matter anymore, because now you can readjust your cheap and cheerful timepiece to an atomic clock (your smartphone synced to GPS time), whenever you want.

  • @BassJournal
    @BassJournal 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How do you compare the weight of these two? Is steeldive lightweight?

    • @TheWatchChannelAU
      @TheWatchChannelAU  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Not particularly....they aren't too far off from each other

  • @daviddyster8539
    @daviddyster8539 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Love my Steeldive SD1953. Wear it in the sauna and pool every day. All good! Very happy!

  • @roamready9732
    @roamready9732 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The Rolex is a wonderful watch and if it cost an appropriate $1250 USD it would be a bargain... But luxury watches are not priced according to what it cost to build but by what 'luxury' demands. So any homage will present better bang for buck. It is amazing what the Chinese can offer at those prices even if they lack any original designs to save their lives. If they threw a miyota 8300 movement with a better power reserve than the NH35 it would be even better!

  • @LeeJohnson-zx2vg
    @LeeJohnson-zx2vg 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I used to be a tissot seastar 1000 divers watch man till i bought a steeldive SD 1953, ive since sold my tissot seastar collection and changed to steeldive, so you can tell what my opinion is.
    Great video by the way.

    • @TheWatchChannelAU
      @TheWatchChannelAU  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks Buddy!! Have a great Christmas

    • @LeeJohnson-zx2vg
      @LeeJohnson-zx2vg 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@TheWatchChannelAU
      You're very welcome, have a great Christmas too

  • @johncrossland5051
    @johncrossland5051 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I've got three Steeldives. SD1979 is a Squale Atmos 50 homage. Ships on wrong strap but fit a tropic and it looks pukka. Wears well but AR coating is an issue on domed crystal that reduces legibility. Got a SD1953 that I got lucky with the NH35 and is very accurate like COSC level +4 sec/day on Water Accuracy Meter. Wears great but everyone knows what a Submariner Date is and knows its unlikely to be a real one unless you are also looking the part and driving the part looking like a highly paid footballer suited and booted and driving a luxury car. You will look a bit of a knob wearing it to the pub in just jeans and polo shirt. So I got a SD1934T that I like the legibility and wearibility of and not many will know about the Explorer its a homage of. All good. Mainly. Wears well. Reads at glance. But the NH35 in it is nowhere near as accurate as the NH35 in my SD1953. I reckon maybe +20 sec/day. I reset it daily. Accuracy is a bit crap after a quartz. Like no battery automatic but don't want to be resetting it daily. Love how Rolex wear. Won't afford one. Thinking of a Tissot Gentleman as a watch that will wear as well as a Rolex with a Swiss movement that should be regulated to be accurate. 10 times cost of Steeldive but 10 times less than cost of a Rolex. Not sure if Steeldive use TMI Indonesian or SIi Japanese NH35 movements. Variability on accuracy you get. Not worth taking it to a watchmaker to regulate an NH35 as they'd charge twice cost of a replacement NH35. Maybe buy another NH35 movements to get a watchmaker to fit it to see if you get an accurate one. If my SD1934T was as accurate as my SD1953 I'd sell my SD1953. I double wrist both and use my SD1953 as an accurate watch to reset my inaccurate SS1934T with!

  • @nickjohnson217
    @nickjohnson217 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    One’s an investment the others a damn good watch for the money! That’s the difference imho.

    • @thetruthhurts7500
      @thetruthhurts7500 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Nope...The Rolex is an excellent dive watch..the other copy is a piece of crap

    • @avakkai
      @avakkai หลายเดือนก่อน

      One is a legendary luxury watch and the other is a value monster. No comparison.
      Neither is an investment.

  • @rsa-runwaysafetyarea1915
    @rsa-runwaysafetyarea1915 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Where can I buy this watch?

    • @TheWatchChannelAU
      @TheWatchChannelAU  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      s.click.aliexpress.com/e/_mMByZLu

  • @Test-Tube-Baby-xo8xx
    @Test-Tube-Baby-xo8xx 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I'd have to borrow money to buy a Rolex. It just doesn't make sense and what would I do with one if I bought it? I wouldn't dare wear it. I'd be terrified of being robbed, paranoid about damaging it and fearful of losing it. It'd just be a cabinet queen sitting at home and even then I'd be worried about my house being broken into while I was out and the Rolex being stolen. Much as I lust over them, in reality it'd just make me unhappy. This SteelDive is impressive but I don't think I'll buy one. I'd always feel like a fraud. No matter how much we kid ourselves it's a fake Submariner at the end of the day. I prefer to stick to quality brands with history like Seiko, Citizen, Tissot, Casio and Yema.

  • @1SaG
    @1SaG 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    IMO, Rolex have really overdone it with their move towards "luxury". I know it's working for them financially, but after having worn a friend's shoddily maintained 5-digit no-date the other day (not one service in nearly 30 years of ownership ... yikes!), I'd rather own a well-maintained or mildly refurbished one of those. It's much less flashy and noticeable on your wrist, it doesn't look as chunky as the more modern iterations of the watch and it was, actually, somewhat affordable when it was new. I'd almost call it "discreet" compared to the more modern versions - both in its looks and in the way it sits on your wrist.
    All that said: The difference in finishing and attention to detail really shows at this level of magnification - the hands and the printing on the dial look so much nicer on the Rolex. Does it really matter though considering the difference in price? I don't think so - but I would be lying if I didn't admit that, of course, I'd rather be wearing a genuine Rolex than a Chinese or even Swiss homage.

  • @Obeijin
    @Obeijin 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What about the Relax ?

    • @TheWatchChannelAU
      @TheWatchChannelAU  4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Is that the Uber fake watch with relax printed on the dial

  • @noddyholder6082
    @noddyholder6082 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    No ones going to shoot you for a Steeldive🤣

    • @Plata-ori-plumbu
      @Plata-ori-plumbu หลายเดือนก่อน

      They'll shoot you thinking it's a Rolex...

  • @billsomerset238
    @billsomerset238 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Steeldive for me

  • @mirandoalfrentesiempre1646
    @mirandoalfrentesiempre1646 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Rolex abusa y ha abusado de sus precios de forma exagerada pero porque se aprovecha de su fama del pasado. Steeldive tiene unas características no lejos del Rolex y me parece absurdo regalar tanto dinero por tal de decir que " tengo un Rolex". No está justificado su precio, y menos si lo comparas con Steeldive. Gracias Steeldive por darle un bofetón a Rolex para que se baje de escalón y así no abuse tanto en los precios. Es de locos.

  • @angusrutter383
    @angusrutter383 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    How long will the steel dive last? Will it really do 300m under water?

    • @TheWatchChannelAU
      @TheWatchChannelAU  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      it should last as long as any other seiko powered automatic watch. in terms of water resistance....300m ..watches (even Rolex) are only ratd to the pressure of 300m....not the actual physical depth...in saying that 300m is about 250 more than anyone who is seeking to stay alive should need! :)
      If I am down 300m...the last thing I will be worrying about is if my Steeldive is still ok.....hahahha

    • @angusrutter383
      @angusrutter383 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@TheWatchChannelAU fantastic thanks for replying 🙏

  • @chrisp.5272
    @chrisp.5272 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I love my Addiesdive Submariner Quartz with the Miyota 2115 movement, its as accurate as the comparable ETA/Ronda Swiss movements. I can't afford a 2010+ Rolex Submariner yet, still in my 20's, and also currently saving for a Cartier Santos. This Addiesdive scratches the Rolex Sub itch for me and I suspect I'll still be wearing it and the automatic Steeldive 1953 when I finally obtain a Rolex Sub. Blue Collar worker in the trades where abuse is bound to happen to a watch so these nice Chinese Homage/Microbrands make much more sense than a Rolex. From a value perspective, durability/scratch resistance, and potential theft the Addiesdive checks all the right boxes for me. Oh and the lume is phenomenal, better than most $200+ dive watches from Swiss/Japanese brands.

    • @TheWatchChannelAU
      @TheWatchChannelAU  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thanks for the comment mate. Keep on enjoying them!

  • @jezztech
    @jezztech 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Rolex for your glass cabinet, SD for your night out in case you got mugged by spooks.

  • @systemx4
    @systemx4 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I have a steeldive, great watch. The rolex is about an investment and will hold value and can sell on, steeldive is throw away.

  • @952651869
    @952651869 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have an addiesdive sold my 20 Yr old gmt master 5 yrs for profit and have not regretted it. My addiesdive only increases by 2 secs a day and can be worn everywhere. Still have a vintage rolex but I love my addiesdive and other small brands. Anybody could have a rolex years back I had 2 and 2 omegas. Things are much more expensive these days.

  • @vijith555
    @vijith555 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have the same Steeldive and the watch is simply brilliant! It even runs as accurate as +2/3 seconds a day - Steeldive does a good job at regulating the NH35 before it leaves the factory. Still cannot believe how you could buy a watch with such good finish and movement for this sort of money :)

    • @BLACKWOLF-1911
      @BLACKWOLF-1911 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Did you buy yours directly from steeldive? I'm thinking of buying the G.M.T. from there website but I'm a little nervous about putting in my credit card number.

  • @rickhammel9541
    @rickhammel9541 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    you should check out the San Martin SN019, even better quality than the Steeldive.

  • @owenlaprath4135
    @owenlaprath4135 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Being disabled certainly crimps the budget, but even if I had a Swiss swimming pool stacked with money, I would not spend USD 20K or more on a watch. Crikey, my last 2 "already house broken" jalopies both together were less than 15K as they sit in the driveway. Here in USA, 15K is the steel/black starter model with date. They come in different trims for 20K to 40K, and then the sky is the limit, with one listed over 80K new, but you can "donate" even more to Rolex's shelter for gnarly executive personnel and their meal fund. I would instead buy that SteelDive, or just keep my 3 Invictas, and instead make a donation to our local animal shelters worth a Rolex :) We'd have some really happy dogues, and I'd still have a really nice "tool watch", which the original Rolex Subbie once was!

  • @charlesharrer4297
    @charlesharrer4297 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I have been saving for decades to get a submariner, and then I got tired of trying to build the bank up for the Rolly. Just recently, I started looking elsewhere 😮. And low and behold, I looked at the SD. OMG !!!! So now I can get some really well-made watches. I ordered my first SD1953 green bezel. I'm so excited!!!!!!!!! A big thanks to all the inexpensive watch reviewers. I've had a complete mind change away from all the ultra's, I've found really great watches------mostly 😢 stay away from sturling, chrome watch bodys insted of ss, just 💩💩💩

  • @pbarcubez
    @pbarcubez 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    good day mga idol!

  • @Ciralluto
    @Ciralluto หลายเดือนก่อน

    To be honest, the Steeldive one has an ar coating, but is not impressive.

  • @BushCampingTools
    @BushCampingTools 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I subbed.

  • @melligeni
    @melligeni 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The Watch looks amazing, but this logo is so ugly 😅. But I got mine! Just waiting Aliexpress

  • @oi_bilbo1082
    @oi_bilbo1082 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I need a watch sugar daddy Z+.

  • @erikh1041
    @erikh1041 18 วันที่ผ่านมา

    At the end of the day, they both tell time.

  • @user-zl5zt9lu7j
    @user-zl5zt9lu7j 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ese reloj Steeldive es fenomenal en todos los aspectos pero tiene un gran defecto, con muy mala solución: se parece demasiado a un Rolex submariner...

  • @user-xu2kk1xi2t
    @user-xu2kk1xi2t 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This is best video of the world!!!! ❤Steeldive forever!!! 😊

  • @asensibleyoungman2978
    @asensibleyoungman2978 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Which would I buy?
    The Rolex is beautiful but even if I could afford one I wouldn't enjoy it. I wouldn't dare wear it because I'd fear damaging it or being mugged for it. That means it'd just live its life as a cabinet queen and I don't see the point of that.
    The SteelDive is amazing value for money but I wouldn't be able to shake the 'guy in a cheap fake Rolex' stigma.
    So my answer is I'd buy neither.

  • @1957bat
    @1957bat 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

    As a Steeldive fan, paying anymore for a watch like the Rolex that is not 15000 dollars better is rather foolish.

  • @GustavoCastro-cv1hc
    @GustavoCastro-cv1hc 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Steeldive for 58€ ❤

  • @markloubser2433
    @markloubser2433 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If you love WEARING your watch, Steeldive is a no brainer. I appreciate some are more into the investment (?) aspect of high end ownership, good luck. This is a tool watch after all.

  • @pablo_chama
    @pablo_chama หลายเดือนก่อน

    it's quite close, but rolex wins this one. of course, if you don't mind the pricing

  • @josephmccammond8932
    @josephmccammond8932 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Owned a Rolex back in 1969 when it cost me a month's pay. I can sincerely say without reservation that every one of my Steel Dive watches have been better. The worst thing about the Rolex was the terrible clasp that terrible to the nth Degree and eventually caused the loss of my watch. Rolex is a nice watch but not worth the price and I am not a fan.

  • @ccooper8785
    @ccooper8785 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    If this Steeldive had a quartz movement I would definitely be buying one although I would prefer a 38mm case.
    Steeldive should be congratulated for producing such a good, reasonably priced watch.

    • @victormorgan1690
      @victormorgan1690 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      have a look at Addiesdive Submariner quarts I find it hard to differentiate from Steeldive productions and is a very good-priced sub

    • @SimonLovelace826
      @SimonLovelace826 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Same. I sold my SD1953 as i find it bulkier than Addiesdive quartz, thicker actually, so now I just retained my addiesdive hulk.

    • @SalvatoreDiazManrique
      @SalvatoreDiazManrique 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@SimonLovelace826Addiesdive automatic Hulk vs steeldive automatic?

    • @SimonLovelace826
      @SimonLovelace826 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@SalvatoreDiazManrique I prefer Steeldive automatic, slightly better build quality.

  • @user-bm7we6yz1e
    @user-bm7we6yz1e 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

    *Literally says anything to compare the Steeldive to the Rolex*
    "Thats not to sat that the Steeldive..."

  • @clifforddriver9434
    @clifforddriver9434 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Supply and demand, Rolex doesn't make any of their watches readily available. You have to get on a waiting list to aquire one. That means they also control the inflated price that goes along with it. It really has not much to do with anything, other than supply and demand.

    • @thetruthhurts7500
      @thetruthhurts7500 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You have to wait..Not everyone waits..learn the game son.

    • @thegorn
      @thegorn 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@thetruthhurts7500 It's not so much about waiting as it is about purchase history, and whether you'll buy more from them in future.

  • @MyThai1612
    @MyThai1612 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I know exactly why I have 8 Steel Divers! They are better than every Swiss watch! The Taiwanese watchmakers a grandios and I would never buy another watch again!!! I am a Scuba 🤿 and I use all my Steelers nearly every day! Nothing to say and excellent watches - can only say: Switzerland close your doors, money and value has nothing to do with European grace! Asia is better and getting more better every day!!! Slowly Europe must getting teached in engeneering - they sleep to long time lazy at them pillow! Time to wake up!!!

  • @Bok2022st
    @Bok2022st 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Well really goes to show you paid for the name it's like wearing a pair of kt-26 compared to set of reeboks or a no name Brand where of decent jeans compared to a pair of Levis or driving a Ford instead of a Maserati they both get the job done but at Triple or quad triple the price these more expensive things for the people that are a little insecure that think the world is a competition,they actually have more money than they do have
    Sence / cents 😂

  • @soggz4246
    @soggz4246 ปีที่แล้ว

    Please.
    Rolex dosnt have a crown…
    It’s a Coronet.👍🏾

  • @chrisfegan3475
    @chrisfegan3475 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I would have pur a steinhart up against a rolexx before it steel duve

    • @TheWatchChannelAU
      @TheWatchChannelAU  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes...but that's a $700+ watch... I chose steeldive as it's literally the cheapest homage out there..

    • @chrisfegan3475
      @chrisfegan3475 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I understand

  • @georgehiphopforever
    @georgehiphopforever 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    But is it fair to compare a watch that costs 100$ to a watch costs 10000$? I own 2 steeldives for the money they are just perfect.

    • @TheWatchChannelAU
      @TheWatchChannelAU  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Of course not! I know the Rolex has a huge price disadvantage!! 😂