Sponsored by Manscaped. Get 20% OFF + Free International Shipping + 2 Free Gifts with my promo code KTO or visit manscaped.com/kto #ManscapedPartner #ad
@@Omegateck16evidently that’s what this video is saying. We disagree though. Being dogshit for a decade has to also count against a team, but apparently it means nothing.
I know superbowl victories are the ultimate prize, but I think you're putting a little too much weight into those when it comes to ranking overall team success in the last 25 years. Having a team like the Bucs over the Eagles, Seahawks, and Packers really downplays just how difficult it is to maintain the kind of success those teams have had for over two decades.
Facts! Tampa went 13 whole seasons without a playoff appearance and were mediocre since their first Super Bowl win in 2002 (no playoff wins until 2020). So yeah, they’re mediocre at best.
Kinda one angle of what determines a team’s overall performance. I would love to see the addition of stat leaders and award winners, maybe regular season record as a cowboys fan personally lmao. EDIT: 13:37 he states its skewed towards SB wins
@@c-3c-3 and he did that poorly still, because if it’s based off wins, appearances should have some value as well, but teams who’ve been are put lower than teams that haven’t even made the NFC/AFC ships…list is all over place and not just on super bowls
2:30 Arizona Cardinals 3:12 Atlanta Falcons 4:03 Baltimore Ravens 5:03 Buffalo Bills 5:59 Carolina Panthers 6:55 Cincinnati Bengals 7:37 Cleveland Browns 8:30 Chicago Bears 9:33 Dallas Cowboys 11:00 Denver Broncos 11:51 Detroit Lions 12:49 Green Bay Packers 13:49 Houston Texans 14:37 Indianapolis Colts 15:28 Jacksonville Jaguars 16:09 Kansas City Chiefs 17:11 Las Vegas Raiders 17:47 Los Angeles Chargers 18:42 Los Angeles Rams 19:32 Miami Dolphins 20:24 Minnesota Vikings 20:17 New England Patriots 22:33 New Orleans Saints 23:28 New York Giants 24:19 New York Jets 25:02 Philadelphia Eagles 26:07 Pittsburgh Steelers 26:58 San Francisco 49ers 28:13 Seattle Seahawks 29:04 Tampa Bay Buccaneers 29:53 Tennessee Titans 30:54 Washington Commanders
Tampa nearly topping B-tier is atrocious. They have no business being ranked higher than teams like the Packers, Seahawks, Eagles, Saints, and 49ers. I feel like being a consistent competitor throughout the century should be valued higher because the fan experience is miserable when you know you're competing for nothing.
2 Superbowl wins in 20 years, and they're atrocious? 3 straight NFC South titles and one of the greatest defenses of all time in the early 2000s Get out of here
Washington hasn’t been to the NFC Championship since 1991 and haven’t won more than 10 games since that same season. They’ve had more name changes (3) than playoff wins (1) since 2000 😢.
For a team that was coached tremendously in the 90's (3 SB's with 3 different starting QB) to being a dumpster fire is crazy...I wonder what changed for for this team in the 2000's?
Hey KTO I got something for you. It’s the graphs. A bar graph without labels and an inconsistent scale to compare 5 different measures just doesn’t make sense here. Something like 5 individual bar graphs comparing each to the league average would make more sense. Great ranking though.
Or what he should have done is shown a graph of the averages for Super Bowl wins, conference titles division titles, playoff wins as a baseline graph and then the graphs wouldn't have been meaningless. You'd have something to compare how each team has done vs what an average team should have done over the past 23 years. Would make it maybe a bit less controversial with some of his placements and also made it clear just how bad some teams like the Lions and Browns have really been this century.
Placing Super Bowls above anything when ranking their performance over 24 years feels like a bad way to weigh a team's overall performance. It really should just be a deciding factor between teams that are close in performance. In no reality should the Giants be above the Packers just because they have more rings. The Packers have been far more consistent, even if they have less rings, and their overall performance is significantly better. The Giants have been incredibly inconsistent and have had losing seasons in 12 of their 24 seasons comparedto the Packers 5. The Giants shoulds be in C with teams that are equally inconsistent like the Vikings and Falcons, with the Super Bowls only putting them a little above them and not bumping them to high-B.
The Giants defeated the GOAT's Patriots twice in the SB, one of those victories against an undefeated team. That's way more valuable than all the Packers' NFC North championships together. And of course more valuable than a single SB ring with a first-ballot HOF QB.
ultimately tho, isnt THE metric, THE standard for this league winning the championship? Why should appearances matter in any way when winning the final game, the most important game, is most important to every player and every team in the league? Its unfair to loop the super bowl into comparisons of ANY other game. Its THE game. That alone is significant enough to put it above ANYTHING else. not to mention, almost half of the entire league doesnt have a single super bowl win. That statistic alone shows how exclusive of company you are to have one. If you have two in 24 years, you are elite, your performances have surpassed league average TWO FOLD
@@jeffreymanier0 It's the most important at the end, but it doesn't mean the best performance, nor does it mean that the team that won made the best performance or was even the best team that season. People seem to forget that in 28-3, the Patriots looked terrible for the first half (hell, Brady through an 82-yard pick-six and their 3 points came at the very end of the half.). They won that game not because they were the better team, but because they got lucky and the Falcons collapsed in upon themselves. When it comes to the seasons that they beat the Patriots, neither of them were they the best team that season even in their own conference, nor were they the best team in the Super Bowl. Both of them they only managed to win by scoring with less than a minute left. If this was talking about best performance under pressure, we'd be talking a different story. But that isn't what we're talking about. We're talking about overall performances, and overall performances need to treat the Super Bowl as another game that is just under higher pressure, and if a team only performs well under higher pressure and is average through the rest of the season (as both Giants teams were with 10-6 and 9-7 records, respectively), then they weren't actually especially good teams.
As a Browns fan I appreciate you keeping it real. When you really compare the situations, there is NO team or franchise that's suffered more than us. Nobody! It's not even close to what us Browns fans have had to endure! 🧡
Well... you guys shoot yourself in the foot every damn time you are at the enge of creating something. Have you seen the "TubFrog" video about the Browns? If you have the stomach to do so, I highly recommend it. The story that blew my mind the most... The Browns did spend hundreds of thousands of $ to pay a firm to evaluate all QB's in the 2014 draft. The evaluation team said all the metrics and tape showed Bridgewater was the best available QB at their position... But a HOMELESS PERSON told your owner he should draft Manziel! And that clown did it! Then there are all the instances when Browns fans cheered after your own QB's got injured... not sure you guys deserve more to be honest. Not to mention how you treated Mayfield... and I mean you fans, not just the Front Office!
@@blasterra91 They at least had the Stafford/Johnson years. Never went anywhere in the PO, but for 7-8 consecutive years they at least had a .500 record on average. Did the Browns ever have that?
@@Smido83the Lions had one playoff win in the Super Bowl era until this year. You could have been born in 1958, grown up, had grandchildren, and died in 2023 at the age of 65 with a single playoff win. A lifetime of misery.
The biggest finesse a QB has ever pulled on an NFL franchise. I tried to tell elated Bronco fans that Russell is not that guy but they always rattled off stats like thats what wins Super Bowls. Everybody thats not a Broncos fan could see that the Seahawks defense was the reason they were so successful. Pete Carroll did a fantastic job hiding Russell Wilson’s weaknesses.
ok so packers are 3rd in wins, 2nd in division titles, 5th in playoff wins, and only 6 teams have more super bowl wins since 2000, and the most league mvps, and somehow are 9th best?
Hard to call this a performance evaluation when all you evaluated really was super bowl wins. Sure for casuals who only pay attention to their team when they are good this might fly but for the diehards the lows are always worse than the highs are high
Want a B tier team? Just have 2 good years out of 24. Congrats, Giants. Outside those 2 years, meet the F group. P.s.: who else thought that KTO would've said the browns superbowl winner the second he said "bias aside"?
If it's so easy why can't your team do it? Giants have only been shi pretty much since Coughlin left other than that they were consistently competing for division championship in a division that was so competitive it didn't have a repeat champion throughout 2000- today
@@nathangifford1424 Because there's just as much, if not more, luck to get to the super bowl as winning it? It's one game among many, even if it's on the biggest stage. Weird shit happens and teams that performed better sometimes lose. Teams that should been in the super bowl fail to make it for weird reasons out of their control (such as the no-call on the Rams that prevented the Saints from facing the Pats in the Super Bowl). Just because you make it or even win the Super Bowl doesn't actually make you the best team. It just made you the luckier team on that day.
I can't help but think that the people complaining about the Bucs being so high are fans of teams that were once good but haven't won anything in their lifetime. Like the Cowboys, 49ers, who are constantly "good"but don't have the championships to show for it, and the fans are too old to remember the feeling, or too young to havhe experienced their prior success but just "know"they should be ranked higher cuz of their storied history. They forget just how incredible winning a SB actually feels. I LOVE the Bucs' history. I'm old enough to remember the creamsicle days, an adult when we won our first and to experience the drought again, only made this current ressurgance even better. Would better season-to-season records have been more fun to fill the gaps, sure? But Iwouldn't trade that for 2 rings. And the Bucs are currently still riding their 2nd "golden era" who knows what the rest of the 2020s look like, they could be considered one of the top teams of the decade by the end of it. Or not, but still, to say the Bucs aren't B tier is ridiculous. All Bucs fans will tell you it's been a great ride, even with the down years.
I think The Dolphins, Commanders and Raiders belong in D tier, or the Lions Jags and Browns need a tier of their own below F tier. While they've been consistently mediocre, they haven't been a consistent laughing stock like those three were decades straight.
Man, the Raiders had an on-field prayer rally when they broke this huge losing streak against K.C. I remember Carr kneeling in a prayer circle. Yeah, they belong down there.
There's definitely too much weight on super bowl wins. Largely mediocre teams with fluke sb runs should not be above consistently good teams with less rings.
No you weren’t, you cheated your way to your first Super Bowl. Don’t get me wrong I love Drew Brees, Sean Payton, and Reggie Bush, but your Super Bowl has an asterisk next to it because your scumbag defensive coordinator/staff and middle linebacker paying the other players to injure offenses AND the players who still did it. P.I. Was karma 🤷♂️ and so was Minneapolis Miracle ;)
The 2000s colts were the most underachieving team ever. One Super Bowl win against a pretty bad bears team. The amount of hall of famers on that team is crazy.
I’d argue the Colts are the most underachieving team in the history of all sports. They’ve had Johnny Unitas, Bert Jones, Peyton Manning, and Andrew Luck, yet they only have 2 super bowl rings to show for it.
The 70s Vikings take that title by a long shot, 5 of the most impactful players of all time on one team and they don't win a single ring and are blownout in every Super Bowl they make.
No way chiefs are A tier. The patriots and chiefs are the only s tier ones with the patriots obviously top. I still love me some Priest Holmes, Dante Hall and Tony Gonzalez.
@@kenny_.Ewas this supposed to be an insult? 😂 thats like saying “oh well Patrick Mahomes will end up winning just as many Super Bowls as Tom Brady anyways” 🤣
6:25 Fun fact: My uncle played against Jake Delhomme in high school and beat him his senior year. He also played at UL, so yeah GeauxCajuns 🤟. Every time I see him, he's always asking how my family's doing and really just an all-around great person. Love the guy! Edit: Also as a saints fan, I got some things to say: I understood every word them Cajun dudes said, thank you SD for Drew Brees (He's better than Brady in everything except longevity), and you will never, ever catch me giving the falcons, Vikings, or Rams, any credit, for anything. Laissez Les Bon Temps Rouler babayyy!!! ⚜️🐊
And he ranked Seattle below the niners, despite us being division champs 3 more times than yall were, and us winning 8 more playoff games than you. And finally us getting a ring when yall haven’t. Dude is straight trash.
Overall not much to complain about in these ranking, my only complaint is the Bengals, they were the laughing stock of the NFL for the first half of the years you're talking about, they are a clear D ranking
The Jets beating the F tier allegations is the biggest win in my lifetime as a Jets fan. I do wish you used our New Logo (Urinating Tree released a video today as well and he also used the old one)
You are the best & the coolest, KTO. You have soo many interesting videos! I'm a big, longtime fan of yours! Cheers! It was a great, entertaining tier list! 📈📊📜
Just a fucking heads up, if you're going to put in a clip of someone screaming so loud it peaks the mic. Maybe, just maybe, think to make sure it's not noticeably louder than the rest of the video. I had fucking headphones in, jesus fuck.
Usually KTO does an incredible job. THIS though is super lazy and inconsistent. If you gave the numbers to someone who isn't an NFL fan, they still would make a better ranking. Very, very sloppy.
The Broncos were mediocre before Peyton arrived. They had only two playoff wins since their previous Super Bowl win in 1998. They struggled to develop a quarterback when Elway retired. And Peyton gave them a nice four year run. Denver is a C+/B- team at best.
Kinda silly how the 49ers are in a tier with 9 teams who all won championships, yet they did not win one. I think recency bias is playing a part here, because outside of a few years with Harbaugh and the most recent years with Shanahan, the 49ers have been extremely mid, much like the other teams in C who made Superbowls but didn't win or didn't make it at all. 49ers have more losing records (13) than winning/.500 records (11) since 2000. Meanwhile, the Cowboys (a tier below) have had 17 winning/.500 records since 2000, with only 7 losing records. Vikings at 14 winning/.500 seasons with 10 losing seasons. Not saying the 49ers aren't better than those teams. They've made it to more Superbowls. But, the team's overall success over the past 24 years shows how inconsistent they are.
As a Dolphins fan, I agree with us in F tier, but I dont get putting the Chargers all the way up in C tier. That's crazy to me. They deserve D tier with the Bills
No, I think low C is accurate. They’ve been fairly consistent in the regular season, they have the same amount of afc championship appearances as the bills, and they have many more playoff appearances than all of the teams in D tier since 2000. Saying the bills are better than the chargers since 2000 is recency bias. The 17 year playoff drought can’t be overlooked.
I was curious how each division performed using KTO's tiers. I used a scoring system similar to GPA: S=5 A=4 B=3 C=2 D=1 F=0 Here are the totals for each division: AFC East: 7 AFC North: 10 AFC South: 6 AFC West: 9 NFC East: 8 NFC North: 6 NFC South: 10 NFC West: 9 Interesting to see the NFC South being tied for first and the NFC North being tied for last.
I think the value on rings is too high, having your team be a consistent contender is more an indicator of a well run organization than a Super Bowl is. Imo
facts, if the playoffs were a 4 game series as well as the superbowl the actual better teams and well run franchises would have won more superbowls, liek the 9ers or cowboys or packers. Superbowls are how well you played on tge day which is not indicative of how good a team is.
Listen, I've been a tremendous Bills fan since 1989. They missed the playoffs for almost 20 straight years. They missed the playoffs the entire presidential terms of Bush and Obama. And even now they are painfully disappointing. They are as F tier as F tier gets
As a Pats fan this list is perfect and I don’t see any flaws in it whatsoever. Eagles or Packers will likely win the Super Bowl but I hope the Lions finally get one
Putting the Giants so high is a joke, almost no Giants fan would even say that, they've been so mediocre outside those SB runs, this is more of a "who has the most SB list" than an actual tier list. Like seriously look at the Eagles and Giants stats side by side for example (Packers work too), the Eagle BLOW them out of the water in EVERY stat but the 1 sb. So 1 sb> literally everything else means this tier list is extremely lazy. EDIT: Wait I just got further. He beat the seahawks under the Giants, now this IS an utter joke I I can't man, what even was the point of this list, again just list the team by SB wins to start then do the other teams in actual ranking I guess.
As a cowboys fan, totally agree. Super fun to watch during the season my entire life always loved watching their regular season games but holy hell the utter playoff futility leaves any hope of having a good year in the dust. At least we get compared to everyone.
2017 Jags were robbed by two, potentially three, of the worst calls in playoff history. Myles Jack wasn't down, calling Bouye for a PI when he hadn't committed one all year, then the horrible PI call on Church for helmet to helmet when Gronk is lowering his head into the player. That Eagles team wouldn't have had a chance against that defense, but we all know the NFL loves Brady.
Pretty solid list, although I would put the Rams in high D tier instead of low B tier. Also, @31:00 "more name changes than playoff wins since 2000" is a HILARIOUS statistic 🤣🤣🤣
Thank you 4:58 Thank you, someone who recognizes what BR organization has done in 20 years. 17:06 KC should be S, the consistency they have shown since the hiring of Reid shows that 16:58 look at those stats.
Sponsored by Manscaped. Get 20% OFF + Free International Shipping + 2 Free Gifts with my promo code KTO or visit manscaped.com/kto #ManscapedPartner #ad
Can u do a video on texas tech Mike leach Adam James
Just love bringing up my cowboys huh, you dream for 8 win seasons 😂😂😂
🐨Great video, but it's shaping up to be a Pennsylvania's super bowl matchup: 🏈Steelers vs Eagles🏈🏆...🧐🐨
*Fun fact:* The Carolina Panthers have NEVER had consecutive winning seasons during their entire history as a franchise so far.
☹️
Fun fact: The San Francisco 49ers have never won a Super Bowl after the release of Toy Story, something even the Dallas Cowboys can claim
😮
Fun fact? Maybe funny but not fun
@@kashitumbapura6691at least they make it there
“Who Dey!”
“DEY have been one of the worst teams in NFL history”
LMAO
Sounds like something Urinating Tree would say not an actual Cincinnati news outlet 😂😂😂
Yo I thought I was the only one who thought that was funny
Bengals are trash.
😂
@@porkchopsandwiches192 all time or what? Cuz past few years with Joe Burrow they’ve been a top 5 nfl team
Super bowl rings should obviously matter, but the Bucs were so awfull the other seasons that I just can't see them that high
2 super bowls.
Yea its the same concept for the giant. Two super rings to mask the other awful 22 seasons
That's just NFC South Football
Honestly Superbowls are what matters most..it makes an F tier winning percentage into a B tier team . Its just that important.
@@Omegateck16evidently that’s what this video is saying. We disagree though. Being dogshit for a decade has to also count against a team, but apparently it means nothing.
Eli manning causally raising the giants up 2 tiers
I miss him so much.
@@thatoneguy1232we all do😭
@@thatoneguy1232 As an Eagles fan, I miss him. He always found creative ways to lose to us lol.
@@thatoneguy1232both him and his brother have faces for radio
@@ahoythere4 more bowls than your entire franchise tho
I know superbowl victories are the ultimate prize, but I think you're putting a little too much weight into those when it comes to ranking overall team success in the last 25 years.
Having a team like the Bucs over the Eagles, Seahawks, and Packers really downplays just how difficult it is to maintain the kind of success those teams have had for over two decades.
What success is one Sb
Any team would sacrifice regular season success for a Super Bowl win. The regular season only matters to crappy teams.
Facts! Tampa went 13 whole seasons without a playoff appearance and were mediocre since their first Super Bowl win in 2002 (no playoff wins until 2020). So yeah, they’re mediocre at best.
Eagles have been pretty shit the last 25 years minus the SB as well tho
@@HutchIsOnYT didn't they make 4 consecutive conference championships in the mid 00s?
as a Lions fan, remembering how bad we have been was not fun but remembering where were at going into this season gave me shivers
From a Patriots fan, I'd like to see you guys finally get some success. You guys suffered way too long. I mean, wasn't Matt Millen punishment enough?
@@saurondpor Matt Patricia 😭
Bengals fan here, same, see yall in the SB
@@blkstarsubbed9346Lmaoo
You’re going to go for it on 4th & 3 in a playoffs game and not get it ultimately losing by a field goal
You just kinda made a list of super bowl wins, not a tier list
Kinda one angle of what determines a team’s overall performance. I would love to see the addition of stat leaders and award winners, maybe regular season record as a cowboys fan personally lmao.
EDIT: 13:37 he states its skewed towards SB wins
What is the point of pro sports to you?
as it should be
@@c-3c-3 and he did that poorly still, because if it’s based off wins, appearances should have some value as well, but teams who’ve been are put lower than teams that haven’t even made the NFC/AFC ships…list is all over place and not just on super bowls
I’d rather have 2 Super Bowl rings with 15 garabage years in between, than being a contender every year but never making it to the top
2:30 Arizona Cardinals
3:12 Atlanta Falcons
4:03 Baltimore Ravens
5:03 Buffalo Bills
5:59 Carolina Panthers
6:55 Cincinnati Bengals
7:37 Cleveland Browns
8:30 Chicago Bears
9:33 Dallas Cowboys
11:00 Denver Broncos
11:51 Detroit Lions
12:49 Green Bay Packers
13:49 Houston Texans
14:37 Indianapolis Colts
15:28 Jacksonville Jaguars
16:09 Kansas City Chiefs
17:11 Las Vegas Raiders
17:47 Los Angeles Chargers
18:42 Los Angeles Rams
19:32 Miami Dolphins
20:24 Minnesota Vikings
20:17 New England Patriots
22:33 New Orleans Saints
23:28 New York Giants
24:19 New York Jets
25:02 Philadelphia Eagles
26:07 Pittsburgh Steelers
26:58 San Francisco 49ers
28:13 Seattle Seahawks
29:04 Tampa Bay Buccaneers
29:53 Tennessee Titans
30:54 Washington Commanders
W
KTO, YOU FORGOT ABOUT THE ANDY DALTON YEARS. BESIDES, JOE BURROW IS NOT THAT GOOD AS A QB IN COLLEGE AND NFL PLAY BUT ANDY DEFINITELY WAS!
I 100% AGREE WITH YOUR SB WINNER PICK! ( SORRY TAYLOR)
You got the vikings and patriots timestamps mixed up
As a broncos fan for life, I deem your rating fair. 🫡 let’s ride.
Tampa nearly topping B-tier is atrocious. They have no business being ranked higher than teams like the Packers, Seahawks, Eagles, Saints, and 49ers. I feel like being a consistent competitor throughout the century should be valued higher because the fan experience is miserable when you know you're competing for nothing.
No, Super Bowls above everything
I'd much rather have a ring in the midst of suckage than be perennial contenders for nothing
Facts
Again, see the giants. B tier because they had 2 good years out of 24, both as barely above 500. Outside that, bottom 5.
2 Superbowl wins in 20 years, and they're atrocious? 3 straight NFC South titles and one of the greatest defenses of all time in the early 2000s
Get out of here
Washington deserves its own tier. They haven't won more than ten games since 1991!
My sympathies to the fans that endured 24 years of Dan Snyder.
I at least had the gift of not having to suffer through all 24 years considering I was born in 2002 lmao
Counterpoint: Browns
Washington hasn’t been to the NFC Championship since 1991 and haven’t won more than 10 games since that same season. They’ve had more name changes (3) than playoff wins (1) since 2000 😢.
For a team that was coached tremendously in the 90's (3 SB's with 3 different starting QB) to being a dumpster fire is crazy...I wonder what changed for for this team in the 2000's?
@@savage751 dan snyder
Hey KTO I got something for you. It’s the graphs. A bar graph without labels and an inconsistent scale to compare 5 different measures just doesn’t make sense here. Something like 5 individual bar graphs comparing each to the league average would make more sense. Great ranking though.
Or what he should have done is shown a graph of the averages for Super Bowl wins, conference titles division titles, playoff wins as a baseline graph and then the graphs wouldn't have been meaningless. You'd have something to compare how each team has done vs what an average team should have done over the past 23 years. Would make it maybe a bit less controversial with some of his placements and also made it clear just how bad some teams like the Lions and Browns have really been this century.
Ya I would like see the Chart with all the teams and categories. instead of just team by team rankings. would just make it easier to see and compare
31:03 "With more name changes than playoff wins since 2000..."
Sweet mother of God, KTO, you didn't have to eviscerate them like that 🤣🤣🤣
Well at least its more playoff wins than name changes now
I can agree to the bucs being in B tier, but not at the top. Those 18 years between super bowl victories were pretty abysmal
Placing Super Bowls above anything when ranking their performance over 24 years feels like a bad way to weigh a team's overall performance. It really should just be a deciding factor between teams that are close in performance. In no reality should the Giants be above the Packers just because they have more rings. The Packers have been far more consistent, even if they have less rings, and their overall performance is significantly better. The Giants have been incredibly inconsistent and have had losing seasons in 12 of their 24 seasons comparedto the Packers 5. The Giants shoulds be in C with teams that are equally inconsistent like the Vikings and Falcons, with the Super Bowls only putting them a little above them and not bumping them to high-B.
The Giants defeated the GOAT's Patriots twice in the SB, one of those victories against an undefeated team. That's way more valuable than all the Packers' NFC North championships together. And of course more valuable than a single SB ring with a first-ballot HOF QB.
ultimately tho, isnt THE metric, THE standard for this league winning the championship? Why should appearances matter in any way when winning the final game, the most important game, is most important to every player and every team in the league? Its unfair to loop the super bowl into comparisons of ANY other game. Its THE game. That alone is significant enough to put it above ANYTHING else.
not to mention, almost half of the entire league doesnt have a single super bowl win. That statistic alone shows how exclusive of company you are to have one. If you have two in 24 years, you are elite, your performances have surpassed league average TWO FOLD
doesn't matter how consistent you are when you don't get a ring lmao
@@jeffreymanier0 "You play to win the game." - Herm Edwards
@@jeffreymanier0 It's the most important at the end, but it doesn't mean the best performance, nor does it mean that the team that won made the best performance or was even the best team that season. People seem to forget that in 28-3, the Patriots looked terrible for the first half (hell, Brady through an 82-yard pick-six and their 3 points came at the very end of the half.). They won that game not because they were the better team, but because they got lucky and the Falcons collapsed in upon themselves. When it comes to the seasons that they beat the Patriots, neither of them were they the best team that season even in their own conference, nor were they the best team in the Super Bowl. Both of them they only managed to win by scoring with less than a minute left.
If this was talking about best performance under pressure, we'd be talking a different story. But that isn't what we're talking about. We're talking about overall performances, and overall performances need to treat the Super Bowl as another game that is just under higher pressure, and if a team only performs well under higher pressure and is average through the rest of the season (as both Giants teams were with 10-6 and 9-7 records, respectively), then they weren't actually especially good teams.
As a Browns fan I appreciate you keeping it real. When you really compare the situations, there is NO team or franchise that's suffered more than us. Nobody! It's not even close to what us Browns fans have had to endure! 🧡
The Detroit lions would beg to differ
Well... you guys shoot yourself in the foot every damn time you are at the enge of creating something. Have you seen the "TubFrog" video about the Browns? If you have the stomach to do so, I highly recommend it.
The story that blew my mind the most... The Browns did spend hundreds of thousands of $ to pay a firm to evaluate all QB's in the 2014 draft. The evaluation team said all the metrics and tape showed Bridgewater was the best available QB at their position... But a HOMELESS PERSON told your owner he should draft Manziel! And that clown did it!
Then there are all the instances when Browns fans cheered after your own QB's got injured... not sure you guys deserve more to be honest. Not to mention how you treated Mayfield... and I mean you fans, not just the Front Office!
@@blasterra91 They at least had the Stafford/Johnson years. Never went anywhere in the PO, but for 7-8 consecutive years they at least had a .500 record on average. Did the Browns ever have that?
@@Smido83the Lions had one playoff win in the Super Bowl era until this year.
You could have been born in 1958, grown up, had grandchildren, and died in 2023 at the age of 65 with a single playoff win.
A lifetime of misery.
"Bronco's county, let's ride!" 🤣😂😅
Lets hide🤣
It will never get old!
The biggest finesse a QB has ever pulled on an NFL franchise. I tried to tell elated Bronco fans that Russell is not that guy but they always rattled off stats like thats what wins Super Bowls. Everybody thats not a Broncos fan could see that the Seahawks defense was the reason they were so successful. Pete Carroll did a fantastic job hiding Russell Wilson’s weaknesses.
Vid starts at 2:37
2:30
ok so packers are 3rd in wins, 2nd in division titles, 5th in playoff wins, and only 6 teams have more super bowl wins since 2000, and the most league mvps, and somehow are 9th best?
yep. if Richard Rodgers hadn't tried to catch an onside kick with his face then they'd be ahead of the Seahawks, but alas
@ it was brandon bostick not richard rodgers but yea same concept
Hard to call this a performance evaluation when all you evaluated really was super bowl wins. Sure for casuals who only pay attention to their team when they are good this might fly but for the diehards the lows are always worse than the highs are high
This is gonna be a tough watch as a Commanders fan
-Z tier
Only place to go from rock bottom is up at least! Def gonna crush the buccs next Sunday.
Commanders fans exist?
Especially because we're the final team alphabetically
@@Datfalconfan We're extinct in the wild
Yo this is a whack list. Nothing to do with my team, but not even staying consistent with your own standards.
Want a B tier team? Just have 2 good years out of 24. Congrats, Giants.
Outside those 2 years, meet the F group.
P.s.: who else thought that KTO would've said the browns superbowl winner the second he said "bias aside"?
If it's so easy why can't your team do it? Giants have only been shi pretty much since Coughlin left other than that they were consistently competing for division championship in a division that was so competitive it didn't have a repeat champion throughout 2000- today
Yea his list and reasoning was inconsistent asf. B tier had teams with rings, and the 49ers with no playoff success is in there.
@@nathangifford1424yall are garbage, and should be D tier max. Just like the bucs
its not just 2 "good years" it was 2 super bowl victories and 3 appearances. And one of those victories is the greatest of all time.
@@nathangifford1424 Because there's just as much, if not more, luck to get to the super bowl as winning it? It's one game among many, even if it's on the biggest stage. Weird shit happens and teams that performed better sometimes lose. Teams that should been in the super bowl fail to make it for weird reasons out of their control (such as the no-call on the Rams that prevented the Saints from facing the Pats in the Super Bowl). Just because you make it or even win the Super Bowl doesn't actually make you the best team. It just made you the luckier team on that day.
Of course the jets one starts with the butt fumble 🤦♂️
Since their entire existence is a butt fumble.
11:01 BRONCOS COUNTRY, LET'S RIDE!
For all the teams tiers ratings go to 31:26
I can't help but think that the people complaining about the Bucs being so high are fans of teams that were once good but haven't won anything in their lifetime. Like the Cowboys, 49ers, who are constantly "good"but don't have the championships to show for it, and the fans are too old to remember the feeling, or too young to havhe experienced their prior success but just "know"they should be ranked higher cuz of their storied history. They forget just how incredible winning a SB actually feels. I LOVE the Bucs' history. I'm old enough to remember the creamsicle days, an adult when we won our first and to experience the drought again, only made this current ressurgance even better. Would better season-to-season records have been more fun to fill the gaps, sure? But Iwouldn't trade that for 2 rings. And the Bucs are currently still riding their 2nd "golden era" who knows what the rest of the 2020s look like, they could be considered one of the top teams of the decade by the end of it. Or not, but still, to say the Bucs aren't B tier is ridiculous. All Bucs fans will tell you it's been a great ride, even with the down years.
amen
I think The Dolphins, Commanders and Raiders belong in D tier, or the Lions Jags and Browns need a tier of their own below F tier. While they've been consistently mediocre, they haven't been a consistent laughing stock like those three were decades straight.
Don't you call us competent
We deserve that F tier
The Dolphins deserve F tier
Man, the Raiders had an on-field prayer rally when they broke this huge losing streak against K.C. I remember Carr kneeling in a prayer circle. Yeah, they belong down there.
My dolphins deserve that f tier until they win a playoff game
Great vid! You and FlemLo ever gonna do the Sports Therapy podcasts again?
KTO ive watched all your videos since your recent one
There's definitely too much weight on super bowl wins. Largely mediocre teams with fluke sb runs should not be above consistently good teams with less rings.
23:28 THANK YOU FOR BEING A NORMAL PERSON AND SAYING WE GOT ROBBED OF A SUPERBOWL APPEARANCE.
So we're the jags, MJWD. But this guy doesn't seem to know anything about them.
Cheaters
Never seen a fanbase cry harder. So satisfying
No you weren’t, you cheated your way to your first Super Bowl. Don’t get me wrong I love Drew Brees, Sean Payton, and Reggie Bush, but your Super Bowl has an asterisk next to it because your scumbag defensive coordinator/staff and middle linebacker paying the other players to injure offenses AND the players who still did it. P.I. Was karma 🤷♂️ and so was Minneapolis Miracle ;)
So by that logic the Vikings, cardinals and colts got screwed of winning a Super Bowl with the bounty program and head hunting scheme.
The fall of the Patriots dynasty is one of the greatest feelings ever. Now if only the fins can get it together...
even if they do, all of the AFC has to somehow get past the Michael Jordan of football
Nice to see my Pats at the top again.
Don't hate me, I was a fan when they sucked in the 1990s too. When they were the Patsies.
Z on Steroids tier cheatriots
@@chiapets2594Haters always hate
@@chiapets2594cry
They still suck and always will Manning sons Brady
At least Parcells made them somewhat relevant in the mid 1990s.
Very confused. The Bears are in D with multiple NFC title appearance and a Super Bowl appearance meanwhile the Titans at C without either of those?
Titans had two AFC title games and a Superbowl appearance but I get what you're saying
Bears had no business being in that one SB and it showed.
They haven't won a playoff game since 2010 though. That's a long time.
@@CharlesH-t9r Not since the 2000 season
@@selfhelp9685Oof
Im no Bears fan but they did make a Super Bowl which you failed to mention...
The 2000s colts were the most underachieving team ever. One Super Bowl win against a pretty bad bears team. The amount of hall of famers on that team is crazy.
I’d argue the Colts are the most underachieving team in the history of all sports. They’ve had Johnny Unitas, Bert Jones, Peyton Manning, and Andrew Luck, yet they only have 2 super bowl rings to show for it.
@@ErikCB912I agree.
The 70s Vikings take that title by a long shot, 5 of the most impactful players of all time on one team and they don't win a single ring and are blownout in every Super Bowl they make.
17:55 holy cow thats the same chargers industry plant from the ravens chargers game on monday
Yes, Super Bowls matter but the Bucs were so bad in other seasons I can't see them ranked that high
11:06 That was hilarious. The editing is just perfect.
My Browns had a parade when we went winless in 2016.. that’s all u gotta know about how bad it’s been for my favorite team 😭
17:38 as a Broncos fan I love this 😂
15:39 umm is that guy dead???
Dude values super bowls too much. Putting the giants and bucs ahead of the packers and Seahawks proves that
16:17 i agree plankton. In the words of Peter Griffin: Oh my god who the hell cares? Most people don't
i love KTO so obviously i'm gonna watch every video of his. however, it is really great watching this as a Patriots fan 😁
Nah Packers should be A, sure 1 ring, but the amount of deep playoff runs and owning the league outside of the 1 playoff game every year is wild
Nope packs are Z tier garbo
With overrated farve and rodgers
This is sarcasm right?
u dont get respect for being all time choke jobs
Nah, too many playoff failures. B+
Bucs above packers or hell even the broncs? How to show you dont know anything in 10 mins.
More name changes than Playoff wins is WILD 💀💀
No way chiefs are A tier. The patriots and chiefs are the only s tier ones with the patriots obviously top.
I still love me some Priest Holmes, Dante Hall and Tony Gonzalez.
KTO fell for the “Put ranking in the video title and thumbnail but only tier list the (things being ranked) and not actually rank them” bug 😔
Wtf? Were you even watching? He does rank them, left to right in each tier.
Brother your ad sounded like a commercial from the 90s😂😂 I say that with the utmost respect 😂😂
Babe wake up, KTO uploaded
Not much of an NFL fan, but I follow it enough to say your rankings are pretty spot on, including my city’s team. Well done.
As a Chiefs fan, I am really loving this timeline after enduring years of torture and failure.
they'll become like how the Patriots are now in like 15 years anyways
@@kenny_.Ehopefully
@kenny_.E Cope lol why shower when you're just gonna get dirty again, right? Cry about it
@@kenny_.Ewas this supposed to be an insult? 😂 thats like saying “oh well Patrick Mahomes will end up winning just as many Super Bowls as Tom Brady anyways” 🤣
6:25 Fun fact: My uncle played against Jake Delhomme in high school and beat him his senior year. He also played at UL, so yeah GeauxCajuns 🤟. Every time I see him, he's always asking how my family's doing and really just an all-around great person. Love the guy!
Edit: Also as a saints fan, I got some things to say: I understood every word them Cajun dudes said, thank you SD for Drew Brees (He's better than Brady in everything except longevity), and you will never, ever catch me giving the falcons, Vikings, or Rams, any credit, for anything. Laissez Les Bon Temps Rouler babayyy!!! ⚜️🐊
damn you did the cards dirty with that opening lol
As a 49ers fan HOW DARE YOU PUT THE 49ers IN THE END OF B TIER!!! Making it to 3 Super Bowl is no joke!
And he ranked Seattle below the niners, despite us being division champs 3 more times than yall were, and us winning 8 more playoff games than you. And finally us getting a ring when yall haven’t. Dude is straight trash.
It’d be really cool if Kyle didn’t make a mess of it when up by double digits one of these days.
Overall not much to complain about in these ranking, my only complaint is the Bengals, they were the laughing stock of the NFL for the first half of the years you're talking about, they are a clear D ranking
KTO videos are always great
C for it is a Crime to put the Cowboys and Chargers that high.
As a former SD Chargers fan, they should be at least bottom of D tier.
If Jared Goff didn’t have one of the worst Super Bowl chokes after looking good enough to win it all, Rams would have been A tier.
The Jets beating the F tier allegations is the biggest win in my lifetime as a Jets fan. I do wish you used our New Logo (Urinating Tree released a video today as well and he also used the old one)
The NY Jokes suck and I love watching them and their loser fans fail year after year. GO PATS!!
@@Jondsmusic you sound dumb tbh
@@Jondsmusic Sorry, bro. Your Pats are scraping the bottom of the barrel right now. Also, Mahomes is going to be better than Brady. 😂😂
@@Jondsmusic lol how did last Thursday feel?
You are the best & the coolest, KTO.
You have soo many interesting videos!
I'm a big, longtime fan of yours!
Cheers!
It was a great, entertaining tier list!
📈📊📜
KTO with top notch quality content as usual 🫡
Just a fucking heads up, if you're going to put in a clip of someone screaming so loud it peaks the mic. Maybe, just maybe, think to make sure it's not noticeably louder than the rest of the video.
I had fucking headphones in, jesus fuck.
Agree, that bit was way too loud.
Is that the Bears part ? I thought wow that was loud even listening from a distance
“More name changes than playoff wins” is DIABOLICAL 😭
Usually KTO does an incredible job. THIS though is super lazy and inconsistent. If you gave the numbers to someone who isn't an NFL fan, they still would make a better ranking. Very, very sloppy.
Based on the stats and criteria he laid out it’s consistent, what would you have done differently?
give examples bro. come on now.
KTO > You
You’re mad because your favorite team has one or no super bowls in the past 25 years. Got it
27:00 the way that cop looks over at Harbaugh, lol.
Anyone who thinks the broncos suck since 2000 aren’t watching anything before the last 8 years. We were killing it before Peyton left.
The Broncos were mediocre before Peyton arrived. They had only two playoff wins since their previous Super Bowl win in 1998. They struggled to develop a quarterback when Elway retired. And Peyton gave them a nice four year run. Denver is a C+/B- team at best.
Lol if you ignore the 4year peyton rental the Broncos have been largely irrelevant since 2000
@@gatienlaurol5793 pfft.
Broncos were irrelevant kid. Aint do nothing, but ig one super bowl put yall into the B tier, but realistically should be high d/low c
@@seraphim3599 hate hate hate. I can’t see you
as a new england patriots fan i’m so glad i got to relive how i felt when we were good
As a Pats fan, my only question was whether the Chiefs had done enough for them to join the Patriots in S tier yet.
They’ve resurged since 2013. Inconsistent in the 2000s and were horrible especially in 2007-09.
S Tier in tierlist is usually just one. If multiple teams get put into S, its just feels like an A+ imo.
Kinda silly how the 49ers are in a tier with 9 teams who all won championships, yet they did not win one. I think recency bias is playing a part here, because outside of a few years with Harbaugh and the most recent years with Shanahan, the 49ers have been extremely mid, much like the other teams in C who made Superbowls but didn't win or didn't make it at all.
49ers have more losing records (13) than winning/.500 records (11) since 2000. Meanwhile, the Cowboys (a tier below) have had 17 winning/.500 records since 2000, with only 7 losing records. Vikings at 14 winning/.500 seasons with 10 losing seasons. Not saying the 49ers aren't better than those teams. They've made it to more Superbowls. But, the team's overall success over the past 24 years shows how inconsistent they are.
7:30 Bengals should be at D or F tier tbh
The second packers got B and not A the list just failrd
As a Dolphins fan, I agree with us in F tier, but I dont get putting the Chargers all the way up in C tier. That's crazy to me. They deserve D tier with the Bills
Agree, Chargers are ranked too high.
No, I think low C is accurate. They’ve been fairly consistent in the regular season, they have the same amount of afc championship appearances as the bills, and they have many more playoff appearances than all of the teams in D tier since 2000. Saying the bills are better than the chargers since 2000 is recency bias. The 17 year playoff drought can’t be overlooked.
Great video man
I was curious how each division performed using KTO's tiers. I used a scoring system similar to GPA:
S=5
A=4
B=3
C=2
D=1
F=0
Here are the totals for each division:
AFC East: 7
AFC North: 10
AFC South: 6
AFC West: 9
NFC East: 8
NFC North: 6
NFC South: 10
NFC West: 9
Interesting to see the NFC South being tied for first and the NFC North being tied for last.
Yeah outside of the packers n vikes, the nfc north is garbage.
props to whoever did the graphics and editing
Eagles in B tier is just silly. Consistently a playoff team that wins playoff games.
Cry more. I know you just mad the Giants are above 😂
Thats.... b tier. Look who's in A tier. No chance they compete with the chiefs ravens and steelers.
I think the value on rings is too high, having your team be a consistent contender is more an indicator of a well run organization than a Super Bowl is. Imo
facts, if the playoffs were a 4 game series as well as the superbowl the actual better teams and well run franchises would have won more superbowls, liek the 9ers or cowboys or packers. Superbowls are how well you played on tge day which is not indicative of how good a team is.
Listen, I've been a tremendous Bills fan since 1989. They missed the playoffs for almost 20 straight years. They missed the playoffs the entire presidential terms of Bush and Obama. And even now they are painfully disappointing. They are as F tier as F tier gets
You might be the only Bills fan who’s not completely delusional.
I am a die-hard cowboys fan, and our ranking is painfully accurate
As a Pats fan this list is perfect and I don’t see any flaws in it whatsoever. Eagles or Packers will likely win the Super Bowl but I hope the Lions finally get one
It's not cause the cheatriots cheated there way to wins in that easy ass division every years for years
@@chiapets2594 blah blah blah excuses excuses. Stop crying, grow up, and realize that for two decades we were a really well run organization
@@chiapets2594fuck you hater go troll elsewhere! You hate us cause you ain’t us!
To make things worse for the Cardinals, they are historically the worst NFL team of all time.
R.I.P. New England Patriots 2 decades reign of terror
They won’t be missed
@@georgelucas2571yes we will hater! And we’ll be back!
@@Jondsmusic Nah. Most of your "fans" weren't even fans of the Pats. They were fans of Tom Brady.
Good Riddance
@@Jondsmusic🗑️
As a chiefs fan, I actually think someone else deserves to win this year
Putting the Giants so high is a joke, almost no Giants fan would even say that, they've been so mediocre outside those SB runs, this is more of a "who has the most SB list" than an actual tier list. Like seriously look at the Eagles and Giants stats side by side for example (Packers work too), the Eagle BLOW them out of the water in EVERY stat but the 1 sb. So 1 sb> literally everything else means this tier list is extremely lazy. EDIT: Wait I just got further. He beat the seahawks under the Giants, now this IS an utter joke I I can't man, what even was the point of this list, again just list the team by SB wins to start then do the other teams in actual ranking I guess.
Imagine trying to devalue the importance of TWO SUPER BOWL VICTORIES
You’re embarrassing 😂
As a Pats fan…this video pleases me
But also reminds me that our dynasty is over lol oh well what a ride it was!
as a giants fan we and tampa are not that high unfortunately😭
Yes we are. 2 championships. Not many teams can say that. Most haven’t come close to that.
Remember this tier list is from 2000-2023.
As a cowboys fan, totally agree. Super fun to watch during the season my entire life always loved watching their regular season games but holy hell the utter playoff futility leaves any hope of having a good year in the dust. At least we get compared to everyone.
2017 Jags were robbed by two, potentially three, of the worst calls in playoff history. Myles Jack wasn't down, calling Bouye for a PI when he hadn't committed one all year, then the horrible PI call on Church for helmet to helmet when Gronk is lowering his head into the player. That Eagles team wouldn't have had a chance against that defense, but we all know the NFL loves Brady.
Nah eagles still would've obliterated the jags
Still had a 10 point lead with the ball. But nobody ever mentions that. Quit crying
@@matthewdowling6549 Your team sucked :D
@@matthewdowling6549another Super Bowl the bum ass Pats only won cuz of cheating or incorrect calls 😂🥱
At this point we are all conditioned to accept that every sports video on YT is going to have a manscaped ad lol
Raiders made a Superbowl that easily bumps them past between Falcons and Panthers
Falcons and Panthers made more Super Bowls than the Raiders in the 2000s
So that defeated the purpose
@@ChiefBlue4298 the Panthers twice and Falcons 1 time also?
Pretty solid list, although I would put the Rams in high D tier instead of low B tier.
Also, @31:00 "more name changes than playoff wins since 2000" is a HILARIOUS statistic 🤣🤣🤣
Lions Texans SuperBowl would feed families
The hell it wouldnt
Okay, this ranking actually sucks. No offense KTO.
21:17 for the only part that matters.
As a Browns fan, you're right. I knew exactly where we were going as soon as I saw the tier list
I don’t think the eagles are a better franchise than the Seahawks….And they haven’t beaten us in almost 20 years now. 😂
Thank you 4:58 Thank you, someone who recognizes what BR organization has done in 20 years. 17:06 KC should be S, the consistency they have shown since the hiring of Reid shows that 16:58 look at those stats.