What Do Artificial Atoms Look Like?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 19 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 402

  • @TheRealGuywithoutaMustache
    @TheRealGuywithoutaMustache 4 ปีที่แล้ว +237

    This channel is a gold mine for information.

    • @BlackRoseRhamnous
      @BlackRoseRhamnous 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Why are you still on every video

    • @hongry-life
      @hongry-life 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@BlackRoseRhamnous For the information? And you?

    • @BlackRoseRhamnous
      @BlackRoseRhamnous 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@hongry-life To find a video yet to be touched by Just Some Guy Without a Mustache

    • @KarmaOTS
      @KarmaOTS 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Fr

    • @fundemort
      @fundemort 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      NO. REDDIT IS.

  • @parasar1980
    @parasar1980 4 ปีที่แล้ว +134

    I always could never understand about the different ELEMENTARY PARTICLES like the Bosons, Quarks, Gluons...and all that stuff...
    Please James...Make a video on these...
    Love From INDiA...

    • @jerry3790
      @jerry3790 4 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      Is James his first name? I thought it was “The”

    • @parasar1980
      @parasar1980 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@jerry3790 😂

    • @fundemort
      @fundemort 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@jerry3790 I thought your first name was Tom.

    • @GRBtutorials
      @GRBtutorials 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Jerry Rupprecht I thought it was “Action”

    • @GRBtutorials
      @GRBtutorials 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      It’s like the periodic table: you have different kinds of quarks, though only two form most of the baryonic matter (anything that’s not dark matter or dark energy): up and down. There are also leptons, which are electrons, it’s two heavier cousins that disintegrate quickly (muons and taus) and neutrinos (which are very light particles required for conservation of momentum). Finally, bosons are force carriers: they are what let particles interact with each other, and carry the 4 fundamental interactions: strong nuclear force (gluon), weak nuclear force (W and Z bosons), electromagnetic (the good ol’ photon) and gravitational (graviton, still hypotethical), plus the Higgs boson which gives mass to other particles.

  • @YuNvrKno
    @YuNvrKno 4 ปีที่แล้ว +246

    Interviewer: How did you become so smart?
    Student: The Action Lab

    • @fundemort
      @fundemort 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      The actual smart person: Well.. if that's how you define "smart"...

    • @rawdeluxe
      @rawdeluxe 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      * Student: Okay Everyone, So Today I'm Going To be....

    • @pyrrehraus6571
      @pyrrehraus6571 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@rawdeluxe
      "...attaining quantum immortality by performing a series of unobservable experiments"

    • @DD-gs2gz
      @DD-gs2gz 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Voidrive ‣ and going to the moon

    • @DinushaJayaranga
      @DinushaJayaranga 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      true story btw!

  • @bkcuriosity
    @bkcuriosity 4 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    Those specific wavelengths of light that atoms give off when being energized is how narrowband astrophotgraphy imaging is possible. High quality filters allow us to block out everything but that specific wavelength (hydrogen-alpha, oxygenIII and sulfur II), and provides some really awesome, high contrast images.

    • @petergoestohollywood382
      @petergoestohollywood382 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      B&K Science and Astronomy Nice. Thanks assh*le. This sounds so interesting now I will have to dig into this topic. I know about Fraunhofer lines but nothing about narrowband astrophotography.
      This will keep me busy quite some time. Thanks again!

    • @BKBees
      @BKBees 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@petergoestohollywood382 lol, I was all, fuck this dude, then I read the rest. It is an interesting topic, lol enjoy it. Search "hubble palate" and check out hubble's images using the SHO palate, it really produces amazing images.

    • @karthikkrishna5870
      @karthikkrishna5870 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Phew alien topics in comment sections .

  • @JAINUL_HAQ
    @JAINUL_HAQ 4 ปีที่แล้ว +123

    We all are same material... Electrons, Protons, Neutrons

    • @fundemort
      @fundemort 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Yea and our houses and cars are built from same materials too. Well kinda all stuff are..

    • @holycow666
      @holycow666 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      ...and morons! You forgot it.

    • @MiG9D
      @MiG9D 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      If only our politicians could realize this.

    • @AshrZ
      @AshrZ 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Or you could say we're all quarks but people who don't know what those are will think you've gone mad lmfao

    • @martiddy
      @martiddy 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      We are just a bunch of quarks and electrons

  • @pecfree
    @pecfree 4 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Bro, how do you ALWAYS find new and super interesting content every single time!!! Best science show ever. For adults and kids alike. (I'm 45yo)
    Thanks a lot

  • @kebcapital
    @kebcapital 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I started watching TH-cam in 2011. This is one of the most amazing channels I’ve stumbled upon! You deserve 10 times the subs you have keep it up and Thank you for the amazing content.

  • @jonorgames9880
    @jonorgames9880 4 ปีที่แล้ว +43

    Oh, it looks like a quantum dot (she said).

  • @goku44ssj62
    @goku44ssj62 4 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Everything is QUANTUM in this channel. Can you cover Quantum Entanglement? I would love to see it on your channel

    • @albertoescamilla639
      @albertoescamilla639 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      and quantum leap episodes!

    • @NMPWN
      @NMPWN 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      But he has to show an experiment and how is he supposed to measure particle spin and show it to an audience so they can be fascinated. They’ll just be looking at numbers on a board

  • @narisenbara5117
    @narisenbara5117 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    How does this channel constantly have amazing things I have never seen or heard of before?

  • @Egoistic_girl
    @Egoistic_girl 4 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    I've wanted to know how these worked and what was quantum about them for a while now.

    • @VRforAll
      @VRforAll 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Not just a marketing term. Who knew

  • @leonpb1409
    @leonpb1409 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I´m gonna send a link of this video to my teacher so we can watch it in class. We are learning about the physics of light right now and the wave lengths so this is gonna help! Keep up the good work!

  • @WouterVerbruggen
    @WouterVerbruggen 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I never thought of QDs like "artificial atoms", cool!

  • @DanielGoncalves-hc8sq
    @DanielGoncalves-hc8sq ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Crazy that this became the Nobel Prize winner🤯

  • @remestario
    @remestario 4 ปีที่แล้ว +42

    These could revolutionize PC RGB LED lighting for good!

    • @mohitbling6658
      @mohitbling6658 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Lol😂😂

    • @TenMillionYearProgram42
      @TenMillionYearProgram42 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      In fairness, they’re going to immensely improve all lighting systems, from decorative and general home lighting, to displays, cameras, and medical imaging. Quantum dots are the light equivalent to, say, graphene or carbon nanotubes in terms of their potential impact to our day-to-day lives.

    • @starvalkyrie
      @starvalkyrie 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I give it 5 years of dead end research to put a few overpriced tvs in billionaires houses that never get watched.

    • @TenMillionYearProgram42
      @TenMillionYearProgram42 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Keld Tundraking they’ve been in mainstream market TVs for about 5 years now, and every roadmap going forward uses them in every emerging display technology, from current transmissive QLEDs, to QD-OLED (if it ever gets off the ground before the better stuff get going), to microLED, to EL-QLED.

    • @starvalkyrie
      @starvalkyrie 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@TenMillionYearProgram42 We'll see how mainstream they are when they're not using antiquated transmission display. Going whole hog on color depth and then turning around and ditching HDR is silly.
      A standard OLED already looks amazing, has great HDR and doesn't have to add yet another material to mine, process, and manufacture. Anyone who went out and bought one of these things cause it had quantum in the name despite using the same backlit tech my $100 monitor uses is just buying pricey toys, not chasing the sensible evolution of tech.

  • @lowgrs1
    @lowgrs1 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I love your channel and watch it through a QLED. Wow I learned so much today.

  • @alphafox4074
    @alphafox4074 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Mind blowing as always..

  • @Piccolo_Sun
    @Piccolo_Sun 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    wow thanks dude you don't even realize but this video just gave me a break through and more understanding of how the world works

  • @RalphDratman
    @RalphDratman 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is wonderful. Thanks so much, Action Lab.

  • @allaroundwinner
    @allaroundwinner 4 ปีที่แล้ว +71

    If everything in the universe is made of atoms...then aren't "artificial" atoms still actually made of atoms?

    • @crispkiller1157
      @crispkiller1157 4 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      Harvard wants to know your location📍

    • @johnwiese6760
      @johnwiese6760 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      No they are made artificially of protons neutrons and electrons

    • @holycow666
      @holycow666 4 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      Everything in the universe is made of protons neutrons electrons and morons.

    • @allaroundwinner
      @allaroundwinner 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@johnwiese6760 artificially?

    • @synapticimpulse7585
      @synapticimpulse7585 4 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      Well, actually: joking aside, not everything in the universe is made of atoms! For example, energy is made of photons instead of atoms. And then there are things like neutrinos. And there could be a whole zoo of particles smaller than atoms, that we haven't discovered yet, including possibly string-like-matter (if String Theory is actually true). And as for Dark-Matter--WTF is that made of!? Further, there is a tangible form of energy we only recently measured a few years ago, known as gravitational waves, which is made from the space-time fabric continuum (whatever that is!). And then there is time itself... time and temporal phenomena exists... but what is that made of?!

  • @jonidimo
    @jonidimo 4 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    There is some material that you can put electricity and change the size according the amount of current ?

    • @fundemort
      @fundemort 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Yes like penis getting bigger according to the amount of blood flowing in it. No joke. It's true.

    • @GRBtutorials
      @GRBtutorials 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Fundemort Grey Prime Defender of Truth and Justice And what does this have to do with electricity? It might be partially triggered by electrical signals, but it’s not the (direct) cause of it getting bigger. Also, he said changing with the current.

    • @GRBtutorials
      @GRBtutorials 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Actually, there is! Piezoelectric materials do exactly that: they deform when electricity passes through them, something we can exploit to make buzzers. It also works in reverse, so we can generate electricity from deformation (but not much, so it’s typically just used as sensors).

    • @petergoestohollywood382
      @petergoestohollywood382 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      GRBTutorials The impressive thing about these piezo electric crystals you’re talking about is that they are exactly what is used in lighters to create the spark which ignites the flame AND simultaneously are the type of crystals which are used in AFM (Atomic Force Microscopy) to precisely move a observed test-sample with a resolution of just nanometers. AFMs Resolution can be as good as that you can visualise individual atoms!!! It’s ridiculous to imagine that a Cristal like this is capable of being used in field so different from each other!
      And quartz clocks utilise a small Cristal that if exerted a voltage on vibrates in a very stable and continuous manner.

  • @pablosmith5473
    @pablosmith5473 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Now let me tell you this. Back in high school in the 90’s I hated sciences, physics, chemistry and those types of geeky courses, I mean, I truly hated them. It was literally lifeless, colorless and extremely boring blank gibberish recited over and over again by a teacher who didn't give a crap about his work and was more monotonous than a freakin robot. I totally failed and was constantly drawing or worst, sleeping instead. But I can genuinely say that if I had a professor just like you, trust me... Trust me I would have LOVED the courses and even asked for more and more! So glad that I discovered your channel, you really have mind-blowing experiments and outstanding knowledge, and you know how to share it in an exciting digestible way. Amazing work. Time to make up for lost time now, thanks The Action Lab.

  • @jetskeejackie7723
    @jetskeejackie7723 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Love your vids lots of love archey

  • @EthanAllred1
    @EthanAllred1 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    *Would the color change if you put them in a vacuum? Or under pressure or extreme temperature?*
    *Can they expand and contract?*
    Would that make a difference in the light refraction?
    🟥🟧🟨🟩🟦🟪

    • @EthanAllred1
      @EthanAllred1 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Don Jon Johnson It's worth asking

    • @EthanAllred1
      @EthanAllred1 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@justinpyle3415 But Maybe?

    • @Egoistic_girl
      @Egoistic_girl 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      What would happen to it if it were to come in contact with let's say... lava ?

    • @EthanAllred1
      @EthanAllred1 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Egoistic_girl yeah... pressure or temperature change.

    • @aniksamiurrahman6365
      @aniksamiurrahman6365 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      How did you conjure that up in comment?

  • @Holobrine
    @Holobrine 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Having full mastery of specifying wavelengths of light seems like a powerful tool for visual art. You could design a piece of art to appear different ways under different lighting.
    And current CG software wouldn’t be able to simulate that because for some reason they work with color as if it was just RGB instead of a full spectrum of light. That works for displays, but not really for light bounces.

  • @johnnywalker6808
    @johnnywalker6808 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Man I loved it!

  • @wreckless_-jl6uu
    @wreckless_-jl6uu 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wow man, that is pretty cool...
    *Great content!!!*

  • @NetAndyCz
    @NetAndyCz 4 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    2:17 I do not like the "size of molecule" things, some polymers have really large molecules. Even the size of atom is relative, because neutron stars are pretty much giant atoms.

    • @nicholasdowns3502
      @nicholasdowns3502 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      While you are right, most people picture a molecule as extremely tiny.

    • @shivangswain
      @shivangswain 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Neutron stars are pretty much made of the obvious stuff in their name - neutrons, not atoms.

    • @5467nick
      @5467nick 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@shivangswain That they are made of neutrons, a subatomic particle, is exactly why NetAndyCz said they can be thought of as a giant atoms. He didn't say that they were made of atoms.

    • @shivangswain
      @shivangswain 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@5467nick Oh, I gotchu. Sorry, English is not my first language so it's a little hard for me.

  • @DANGJOS
    @DANGJOS 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    @The Action Lab Nice! You could follow this up with a discussion on color gamuts and color science in general. Something I'm very interested in at the moment. I have a pixel 3a, and it has a wider color gamut than my previous phone. Certainly looks better and is fascinating!

  • @the_hanged_clown
    @the_hanged_clown 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    2:05 just goes to show how, even a the minute scale, anything interacting with anything else does so and reacts as per their physical properties, or the way they're shaped

  • @davealan5685
    @davealan5685 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    @4:15 He says the variance is only 5nm, but the color on the vials are clearly changing into drastically different colors (and therefore different wavelengths) while the flashlight is on them. I'm guessing it's imperfections in the lighting, but the changes are surprisingly varied.

  • @rogelv8td
    @rogelv8td 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    More videos of quantum physics please love your explanations

  • @philosophysnail6669
    @philosophysnail6669 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    DUDE THATS SO COOL!!!! THANK YOU FOR SHOWING US!!

  • @christianheichel
    @christianheichel 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That's the same thing that happens in blue butterflies They don't actually have blue wings They just have the surface of their wings all carved with valleys however many nanometers in width is needed for you to see the color blue. It's interesting if you get them wet they turn a gray color because the valleys are filled in.

  • @sheetalagarwalla1241
    @sheetalagarwalla1241 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Today it has won itself a Nobel prize 🏆

  • @ManojSingh-dy7qt
    @ManojSingh-dy7qt 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    thanks it can be used in creating programable matter(change colour specially)

  • @ThinMints420
    @ThinMints420 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    When atoms are made out of atoms

  • @vinstinct
    @vinstinct 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for this video. I've done a lot of research on oled vs qled, and never really understood QLed. Most websites just say "more pure color" compared to LED or something like that.

  • @albertoescamilla639
    @albertoescamilla639 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very intresting, thanks for the video

  • @HooksBill
    @HooksBill 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thinking back to before we had TH-cam. We would have to read and sometimes research for a days to learn what we're now able to learn in a few minutes of watching video. I watch around 10 educational videos per day. I'm still not a genius, but better informed.

  • @woocash7488
    @woocash7488 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I would be interested to know how they are able to separate the particle by size at such a small level

  • @jonathannadeau6218
    @jonathannadeau6218 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I’ve experienced first hand the changing of colour of a material according to the size of the particles when I was studying icon painting. We learned how to crush our own pigments to make the tempera paint needed. For that we used different minerals and the most interesting (and expensive) one was lapis lazuli. While crushing it with our glass tool we had to be careful to stop at the right moment because at a certain point the blue pigment started to turn purple and if we didn’t stop we would end up with red instead of blue.

    • @TheActionLab
      @TheActionLab  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Interesting. But I believe that the color change you speak of was a different phenomenon than here. That was actually due to a chemical reaction with the blue pigment. These quantum dot particles have no pigment in them. The color change is completely a quantum phenomenon due to their size only. Pigments give off multiple wavelengths of light as well (Although you only see one color). These quantum dots only give of one specific wavelength.

    • @NetAndyCz
      @NetAndyCz 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Birds and butterflies have colour based on the nano-structures of their scales and feathers.

    • @jonathannadeau6218
      @jonathannadeau6218 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      The Action Lab I wonder what chemical reaction it could have been. There was only water and the rock and the colour was changing when the rock was crushed into particles of a certain size. We were warned not to crush it too fine cause it turned red. Do you think a reaction with the water couldn’t happen unless the powder was fine enough ?

    • @jonathannadeau6218
      @jonathannadeau6218 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      NetAndyCz exactly. Like the feathers of a blue jay that are only blue at a precise angle but otherwise brown. I though it was the same phenomenon happening with the lapis lazuli.

    • @TheActionLab
      @TheActionLab  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jonathannadeau6218 Well I'm not sure exactly what was going on with your pigment. But I'm sure that it was not due to this quantum phenomenon because to get the color red you would need to have larger particles than the blue ones. Blue is in the 2nm range particle size and red is in the 6nm particle size. So if somehow you were making nanoparticles, grinding more would push them more towards the blue end of the spectrum, not the red. Also, this quantum dot phenomenon only works with semicoductors (like Si, CdTe etc.)

  • @coolnegative
    @coolnegative 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I would have guessed that since even though they are so small, they are still crystal. So I figured it would have something to do with refraction.

  • @bryancooper5180
    @bryancooper5180 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very cool. Really informative! Hey can you do a vid on the "electron conductive band"? Would love to learn more about how it works!!

  • @Pooka_
    @Pooka_ 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Frikin mad lad at 6:09 mins

  • @shriawesomesawant3617
    @shriawesomesawant3617 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    You are awesome bro...

  • @flurgy22
    @flurgy22 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So when you melt down crayons you get a weird brown color, what would happen if you mix all of those? Would you end up with a funky never seen before fluorescent color?

  • @ucanhle5272
    @ucanhle5272 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    0:38
    "But when i say small, i mean small"
    - The Action Lab - 2020

  • @AlexKing-tg9hl
    @AlexKing-tg9hl 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    What does the IR spectrum of the material look like?

  • @Arsoona
    @Arsoona 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Main reasons why we love science
    And why we have knowledge on it

  • @bradayers1563
    @bradayers1563 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I think this couldve benefited my a Jablonsky diagram but still a great video

  • @DANGJOS
    @DANGJOS 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    @The Action Lab But what causes the quantum dots to be different colors under normal lighting?

  • @hunter00047
    @hunter00047 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Talking about atoms. Are they really round because I understood that there is no such thing as a bend it's just a series of straight lines under extreme magnification which we cannot achieve. So atoms must be of crystalline structure?

  • @davealan5685
    @davealan5685 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The comments about cadmium being toxic is disturbing. As we become more and more technologically advanced, there are going to be more and more new forms of materials harmful to humans. And yet on the regulatory side, laws tend to be very specific to existing technologies so it's scary that mass production of new and previously exotic materials could be wildly distributed long before regulator oversight has had time to really even give them careful thought. Thumbs up for calling attention to the cadmium issue.

  • @ilovemykitties84
    @ilovemykitties84 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    you know you're a toxic chemical when you're less toxic by being mixed with tellurium

    • @TenMillionYearProgram42
      @TenMillionYearProgram42 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Cadmium dots, yes. There is ongoing effort to use other transition metals, like Si, In, etc. Cadmium is not used in most TVs, to correct the video. For example, the Nanosys film Samsung is using currently in its QLED TVs are ZnSeS, with an Al2O3- shell. They were InP based in 2015 and 2016.

    • @ilovemykitties84
      @ilovemykitties84 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@TenMillionYearProgram42 i know, i know, im a DR. too

    • @neutronenstern.
      @neutronenstern. 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Sodium is very Dangerous. Chloride is very Toxic. SodiumChloride tastes well in small amounts.

    • @ilovemykitties84
      @ilovemykitties84 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@neutronenstern. are you from the roman empire? its called sodium

    • @neutronenstern.
      @neutronenstern. 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ilovemykitties84 I'm from Germany (Sodium =Natrium in German). But thanks for your correction.

  • @robertguswel9538
    @robertguswel9538 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I passed my science class cuz of this channel 😂❤️

    • @Jared7873
      @Jared7873 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Congratulations!🙂

  • @SDinnovation
    @SDinnovation 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Your experiment are unique , however I get addicted

  • @Peasmouldia
    @Peasmouldia 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    There's a village near where I live that has cadmium contamination dating back to lead mines that were excavated in Roman and pre-Roman times. It's still considered dodgy to grow your own fruit and vegetables there, due to the possibility of cadmium poisoning.
    Ta.

  • @andrecarvalho9637
    @andrecarvalho9637 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Now I understand how QLED TVs work. I thought they were actual LEDs like OLED TVs from LG.

  • @GreekWar321
    @GreekWar321 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    *_The sad thing is, he shows you something, and you learn in a video, which is 6 minutes long, on the other side schools need hours to explain this_*

  • @robsonicam
    @robsonicam 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazing!

  • @Andrew90046zero
    @Andrew90046zero 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    In the first half of the video I was thinking to myself, “this would work nice in a TV”. Then right after that he starts talking about QLED XD.
    But just imagine, having the ability to dynamically change the size of these atoms in a TV. So that now TVs work off of a HUE and brightness rather than RGB. So In theory you wouldn’t need 3 sub pixels for one whole pixel. You would just have 1 pixel thats 3 times smaller. Also allowing you to triple the resolution.

    • @TenMillionYearProgram42
      @TenMillionYearProgram42 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      No, still RGB. Current QLED TVs use a blue GaN LED backlight for blue on account of the blue dots being finicky, and shine through a film packed with red and green quantum dots, yielding a very pure white backlight for the LCD RGB color filters to then make whatever color they should need. Eventually, they will reach a self-emissive state driven by electrical current vs light stilumus, but will always be RGB. That’s just down to how the human eye perceives color, tbh.

    • @TenMillionYearProgram42
      @TenMillionYearProgram42 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Andrew900460 the sizes don’t change; they’re static.

    • @Andrew90046zero
      @Andrew90046zero 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@TenMillionYearProgram42 Well I know, I was just imagining in the future we might use this principle to develop a different type of color changing light source that doesn't use RGB. Where it would just be a white light source and you can filter all but the wavelength you want. And Since each pixel wouldn't be made of 3 sub pixels it would also, in theory, allow for higher pixel densities.

  • @TigerStrike8000
    @TigerStrike8000 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    What came to my mind.... how do fluorescence light and mercury vapor lights work?

    • @petergoestohollywood382
      @petergoestohollywood382 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      GHOTI GUY you got a glass tube with a near vacuum and “filled” with mercury vapour. If you ionise Mercury atoms by the means of electricity they radiate uv radiation outwards which on its own would be rather harmful. Glad a layer of phosphorus coated to the inside of the glass tube catches this highly energetic short waved uv radiation which then excites the phosphorus and through a phenomenon called Chemiluminescence the excited phosphorous itself now radiates a set of wavelengths out in retrospect and accordance to the lamps description of light colour.
      There you go. Might wanna check some of the words for yourself ;)

  • @aura4977
    @aura4977 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How will a 0.1 Nano meter particle of Cadmium telluride will look like under UV
    Brighter then the brightest green ?

  • @arunnnnnnnnn
    @arunnnnnnnnn 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey thanks for this...
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    However which TV do you have.......
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .and another thing i wanna
    Give you a suggestion, why dont you try putting a large humidifier on top of your fire and air umbrella sticks and vaporise the water by vibrating it.....TRY IT maybe it might work....

  • @brettcameratraveler
    @brettcameratraveler 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I believe the iridescence of butterfly wings is based on its nano physical structure as well.

    • @petergoestohollywood382
      @petergoestohollywood382 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Brett Cameratraveler it is

    • @iamdave84
      @iamdave84 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      On the topic of interesting insect wings, I've read that dragonfly wings have tiny spikes that physically destroy bacteria

    • @iamdave84
      @iamdave84 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Here it is: th-cam.com/video/r1grnyp3Ixk/w-d-xo.html

    • @petergoestohollywood382
      @petergoestohollywood382 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      David Hill wow, I didn’t know this. This is absolutely fantastic. Thanks a lot!

  • @bellphorion
    @bellphorion 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Do these dots keep their color forever? Could they be used as paint replacement? Thank you for your efforts.

  • @JAYLATHIA
    @JAYLATHIA 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can you make the video of: Anyone (let's say living being) which vibrates and resonates with the same frequency of it barrier (e.g. wall or something) then that human being can penetrate through the wall. This is shown in the season of Flash if you remember.
    In that The Flash resonates the frequency of its barrier and can penetrate through it.

  • @sarthak127
    @sarthak127 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What will happen when hydrophobic substance dip into an acid, will it show reaction or it repell water molecules??

  • @Slowly_Going_Mad
    @Slowly_Going_Mad 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I would like to see advancements in the carbon based q-dots definitely less hazardous.

  • @kalyanbratachandra
    @kalyanbratachandra 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can you do an experiment for me?
    Will the syphon work in vacuum? Does it need atmospheric pressure to take place?

  • @leilanala
    @leilanala 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    The way you describe it, makes me think of making a colorless or black/white glasses, or do I think in the wrong direction. Anyway the same way you could make a colorblind see color!?

  • @dylanvellut
    @dylanvellut 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    So can’t you mix these liquids to make a bright light vial under UV ?

  • @darkmask2825
    @darkmask2825 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    A small request please define time.

  • @rakeshto6891
    @rakeshto6891 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    2:35 if sun light does not have any Mass how it can hit out of its level of electron?
    And what happen when light hit the Nucleus level?

  • @diptirastogi2735
    @diptirastogi2735 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can you tell me where you got this?plz.. tell.Help plz.

  • @kennythawsh
    @kennythawsh 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Would it be possible to make it shine like gold? If you could get any wavelength of light then you should be able to do that right?

  • @uridahishratali6982
    @uridahishratali6982 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazing.

  • @parkey5
    @parkey5 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can I ask j you a quantum physics question?
    At a fundamental level is evening waves of energy. So are electrons point like physical objects or a wave of energy. Protons and neutrons are made of quarks, are quarks physical or waves of energy?
    Theoretically if we could shrink ourselves to subatomic levels or inflate an atom to macro household sizes, that we could see, would we see balls like in the picture we see of quarks, or just detect fluctuations in a field?

    • @petergoestohollywood382
      @petergoestohollywood382 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Mark Parkinson you wouldn’t “see” at all. And this is a really great question!

  • @giovanniparaizo6554
    @giovanniparaizo6554 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Could you make black lightning using your low pressure sodium vapor lamp and a plasma ball filled with sodium vapor?

  • @ZombieBenderReturns
    @ZombieBenderReturns 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Does any object have colour then or is it like this and it’s all about the size of of the particles?

  • @Healthywealty
    @Healthywealty 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I love physics and chemistry, this channel tells me that I really have a good basic understanding from studying it by myself. I just read an article on muons, which have a stronger charge than electrons. So I’m wondering if I could make this video relate to what I learned about muons ? Don’t laugh guys🤔

    • @eusterich3035
      @eusterich3035 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Dont u study in any uni?

    • @Healthywealty
      @Healthywealty 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      larpoel Gaming no just at home, and social science in college.

  • @vladbpootin3122
    @vladbpootin3122 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Would this appear blue/violet if the particle size could be made smaller than 2 nanometers? What if you mixed them?

  • @riyakansal7116
    @riyakansal7116 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I am krishna from India. My question is why rainbow appears perfect circle?..hope you answer me and understand my question

  • @marcogrothe3712
    @marcogrothe3712 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I knew it, size matters!

  • @kevmitch4992
    @kevmitch4992 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So when light strikes it and it bends we see the wave length they showing us ?

  • @tomatomtom4921
    @tomatomtom4921 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    So I guess it's not possible buy ready made vials for home decoration right?

  • @KP-tl7ir
    @KP-tl7ir 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Mass effect music in the background.

  • @generalkenobi4555
    @generalkenobi4555 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    the tim is nice

  • @TheNewton
    @TheNewton 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Now I've seen ultraviolet brown

  • @123unknownsoldier126
    @123unknownsoldier126 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I’m just a little bit confused how to different particle sizes are retained in solution. For example, if I have coarse ground salt versus fine ground, the size of the grind wouldn’t be retained after dissolution. As I just misunderstanding something here? Is it more along the lines of a polymer where each of the tellurides have a different number of atoms per molecule?

  • @sintaxera
    @sintaxera 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Today I learned what quantum dots are

  • @lookupverazhou8599
    @lookupverazhou8599 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hos does something snapping from one energy level to another create a wave?

  • @Darkev77
    @Darkev77 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    3:34 why doesn't this apply to all materials? When you reduce the material size, you limit the number of diff colors that can be produced by that material.

    • @petergoestohollywood382
      @petergoestohollywood382 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Darkev it does. You might wanna check out where the “colour” of a butterflies wing comes from. Destin from smarter every day got a great video with electron scanning microscopy of a butterfly. I just say two things: Nature is hecking brilliant and you can make “colour” with holes or pins.

    • @timng9104
      @timng9104 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Even ligands stabilized gold nanoparticles (spheres, rods ~nm diameters) can be tuned to absorb a range of wavelengths

    • @Darkev77
      @Darkev77 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@petergoestohollywood382 Awesome thanks for the vid recommendation!

    • @Darkev77
      @Darkev77 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@timng9104 oh thats cool! But does this "wavelength absorption/emission depending on size" feature apply to specific types of materials, or all of them?

  • @whileistaysecluded
    @whileistaysecluded 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    So how do you dispose of them??

  • @igxniisan6996
    @igxniisan6996 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    *This phenomenon is called "Raman Scattering"*

    • @kylezo
      @kylezo 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Not to be confused with "Ramen Scattering", which is what happens when I put too much hot sauce in my ramen.

  • @ArieteArmsRAMLITE
    @ArieteArmsRAMLITE 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Over time this guy has grown on me. I guess you could say he won me a banana, you thought I was gonna say 'over' right there but I didn't. Hi.

  • @bungwohlio
    @bungwohlio 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Imagine new TV technic with this

    • @vinstinct
      @vinstinct 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Like qled TV's he mentioned in the video?

    • @bungwohlio
      @bungwohlio 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@vinstinct I wrote the comment before the end of the video and was too lazy to delete it.

  • @gionata23
    @gionata23 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What makes a particle “bigger” than another? What are the “boundaries” of a bigger proton? More space around quarks? And what about electrons? But above all, how do you measure the size of an atom?
    Sorry I couldn’t stop questioning 😂

    • @petergoestohollywood382
      @petergoestohollywood382 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Gionata ugh... You ramble a mountain of things in a confused manner most of which you seem to lack basic basic basic understanding. You try to use big word but fail miserably since you didn’t begin at the basics. Start at the bottom and work your way up! Basic chemistry!!! should be a good start considering you think a proton could be “bigger” than another proton. Bohr model of atoms now, atomic orbitals afterwards -> ValenceQuarks and gluons later!

    • @gionata23
      @gionata23 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Peter goes to Hollywood that’s why I used the “” at the word bigger. I’m a very big fan of quantum physics but I definitely can’t call myself an expert.. all I meant with all my questions was just trying to understand what he means when he talks about diameters and sizes of atoms, considering he’s referring to the same material :)
      Always love to learn more, even if the conversations gets a little simplified, when possible of course.

    • @petergoestohollywood382
      @petergoestohollywood382 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Gionata im a big fan of economy... doesn’t necessarily mean I know anything about it.

    • @gionata23
      @gionata23 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Peter goes to Hollywood oook :)

    • @petergoestohollywood382
      @petergoestohollywood382 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Gionata Tell me how are 1s^2 2s^2 2p^2 and sodium related?

  • @MammaOVlogs
    @MammaOVlogs 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    ls there an artificial Eve?