The Best Monitors for MAC Computers: nilsoncreative.com/best-monitors-for-mac I made a list of the best monitors you can buy for Mac computers! You can check it out by clicking the link above. I will be adding more monitors over time! If you have any suggestions, let me know.
I was using 32" for 3d modelling and upgraded to 34" ultrawide monitor and i gotta tell this; vertical space is not really good enough (same height of 27" of 16:9 monitors). I had to move my head to look to the sides with ultrawide and if i want to fix that by moving the monitor far away from me; height of the monitor seems not good enough to work with from that far. 3 months later i am switching back to normal 32" monitor and quite happy about it. If you still want to use an ultrawide monitor then i recommend you to have a bigger sized one than 34" as video suggests; and have a curved one so you would need less head movement to look at the sides (because of the curve, sides will be closer to your viewing angle). Just be aware, with curved monitors you might have weird bending on straight lines which might be a problem for doing digital art with it.
Cool mate, I am also working in the 3D industry and was hoping for an answer like that! Essentially I want to move from 2 monitors to only having one. The question I am asking myself is whether a 32“ monitor is fine for having 2 applications opened up next to each other. (Let‘s say you are working with some kind of software and browsing the web)
@@acrossARTS If you are using 27" monitors for your 2 monitor setup, 34" ultrawide might work for you. About having multi aplications on 16*9 screens, it might feel a bit tight. At the end i think you must try it yourself and decide which is working better for you. Good luck mate.
@@mobywk The 34 inch ultrawide wasn't as large as I thought it would be. You made the right choice. Now if only it had the same vertical height as the 32 inches standard monitor---21:10 instead of 21:9 aspect ratio.
Very true. It shouldn't be this rare to find. Now if only someone could also do stress tests on GPUs with a regular monitor, ultrawide monitor, and super ultrawide monitor.
34 inch is a 27'' + wider while 32 inch is a 31 inch 21:9 + more height . for youtube + tv series a little bit smaller for movie compare to 34 inch. After using both i pick the 32 for everyday use
I don't know if I fully agree with the conclusions you drew. Though I appreciate you highlighting the video playback disadvantages for 21:9 monitors. I think productivity and video playback use cases are at odds with each other. 21:9 really does seem great if having multiple windows open simultaneously is something that would be useful. On the other hand, 16:9 monitors are pretty crap for that, necessitating multiple monitors if you must have that aspect ratio and multiple windows open. I'll have to try for myself
So 38" 32:9 that has the vertical dimension same as a 30" monitor would be your ideal solution? LG has this and I'm sooo tempted between this and the 32:9 Samsung
honestly for people with this question, I'd go with the 48" lg c1 oled if you are able to sit far enough from it or create a custom desk like two desks together. it's cheaper than the 32:9's has better picture quality and more screen real estate vertical as well as same horizontally. because of the perfect blacks of oled you could actually just sit same distance and use only the bottom half of the display that would mirror what a 32:9 woould be. Plus next year they will come out with 42" oled 4k@120hz and low input lag so could even wait for that. the ultrawides are becoming obsolete with the new technology and will be just niche for looks rather than funtionality soon.
This one of the first videos I’ve made and I can’t believe it has this many views! I know my voice and tone is not the best yet but that was one of the reasons why I decided to create this channel, so I could improve my communication skills. Thank you for watching and if you found this video helpful, please consider subscribe so I can make more videos like this! 🙌
i think u re russian right? :D by the way thanks for the review, i exatly for the same dilemma, i need 3 tabs open, and be some playe for the desktop, maybe for me a 32:9 would be a better option? just don't know because, if i want to stream my pc via moonlight i have alay cange the 32:9 resolution to 16:9 when i would like to game on a laptop or tablet or pone? i really hesitant, becasue most of the time i want to be able to reach my desktop from anywhere the world without changing resolution and stuff, maybe ahve to stay with a 32 inch 16:9 or do you have any advice for that? thanks in advance! :)
I like your content and I have subscribed. What surprises me about this channel is you have 500 subscribers and TH-cam still allowed you to monetize your channel. How is this? Minimum subscribers threshold is usually 1000
I tried both. The 34" ultra wide is no good. Most websites and videos are optimized for 16:9 and not 21:9 and while you can put more websites side by side on the 34 you lose quite a lot of vertical space and it just looks odd. If they had a monitor that was the same height as the 32 and ultra wide, then that would work well I think.
Thanks so much for this video. I had the ultrawide and thanks to your video picked up the 32” QHD and I’m enjoying it way more. I learned that I value the vertical room more than the horizontal for work and content viewing. Thanks again!
I was in a fight for my life deciding between a 32" 4K vs a 34" WQHD version before I saw this video. I have an old Asus 34" and i've grown very fond of the screen real estate, but I agree the black bars during media consumption are a little disappointing, but also something I got used to. Thanks for the video, and I think i'll be trying out the 32"!
How has the journey been so far? I'm in the same dilema; I would like to benefit from the clarity that the 4k offers and the width of a 34" for multitasking. Don't know which would be compromised?
@@Jay_Mawufemor bought a 32 inch LG...and I am using always 2 windows beside each others, without problems, only important thing to take care of! : by the 4K version....
Very useful comparison Nilson, bravo! I myself used to consider between those two monitor types and finally chose the 16:9 as it naturally screen as well as the convenience. So lets choose wisely everyones! 🤑
Excellent video, I was very confused not knowing how to decide on 34 or 32 2k, it's nice to see that you answer most of the questions, nobody does that in the reviews, congratulations, GREAT GREAT video, greetings from Mexico ...... I should put subtitles option hehe
Never buy flat ultrawide - it's terrible for eyes, especially if you're a programmer. Most of the text windows align text by the left edge, that's why your eyes will target left side much more often and right eye will get damaged
So what monitor do you currently use, I noticed the ps5 and Xbox controllers? I’m looking for a fast refresh rate 32” or bigger for my M1 MacBook Pro and PS5 and am stuck on what to get!
34 inch ultrawide is the same height as what a 27 inch normal monitor will be. That's honestly big enough, 32 inch diagonal is overkill and too big for desk use. Width >> Height for me.
So many games don't work well on 21:9..I'm so f*ing tired of black bars...I recently bought a 32" 2560x1440 240hz and I think its the perfect monitor after using my old 3440x1440 100hz for so long.I wish I had bought it earlier...
That is what making me worried,It will look as sharp as 24" 1080p... But just few increase in pixel density over ~102ppi wiil provide more clarity and shaprness even when gaming,I notice my 1080p 27 looks blurry because of 82 ppi...
My gripe with UW exactly. Those who are in ultra productive workflow go for the 32" 4K UF or the 38" or 40" UW. Believe me, you will appreciate the vertical space than the horizontal area. I own an LG 34WL5000 and thinking of getting either of the 2 mentioned previously.
I prefer 32" 4k Resolution due to (Ratio), most Movies/Stream I watch is not compatible with my 34" Ultrawide Monitor (I also used a extension called ULTRAWIDE Video to make the video fill entire screen, but it kinda zoom in all the movies/video and it make the video quality kinda wack even if its in 2k/4k quality)..So yah if your onto Watching/Stream also if your doing any office related work like excel then 32 inch 4k monitor is better, You will use scrollbar lesser than ultrawide. I have ultrawide 34 Inch (3440x1440).
@@guganesan.ilavarasan I have LG 34GP83A-B (Ultra Wide 34") for a cheap price at craiglist for 300$..I do not look for brand for any 4k 32' since all of them pretty much have the same resolution and refresh rate stuck at 60hz..just waiting for any 32" 4k monitor to go down to 200-300.
I had Dell 27inch monitor but decided to get a bigger monitor so purchased the 34" LG monitor. After using it for a couple of days, I decided to return the 34", the lack of vertical height was showing up.I found reading or scroll down documents/web pages uncomfortable whereas on the 27inch I could see the whole thing and the layout seems more clear. Vertical height makes a massive difference in my opinion especially for people who do office work, need to read documents, use office/excel etc. I did end up buying a 32" monitor and to me its perfect. The height makes up for the lack of width. And on 32inch split screen is adequate enough
Hi as a programmer that codes, google and watch TH-cam tutorials a lot with occasional gaming like rocket league which one is better in your opinion? Ultra wide can have 3 windows comfortably but then the vertical height for the 32 inch means I can see more lines of code…. Kinda stumped right now
@@jadmurr8863 I ended up getting the Dell S3422dwg... Don't regret it the 3 windows come in real handy for comparing documents but even for 2 windows the second window I can open 2 code editors which is pretty cool
I went for the Dell S3422dwg for the width and am glad with my decision, I can compare 3 docs side by side and when it's 2 windows, I can have 2 code editors open on the second half on the screen,which is pretty cool imo
Thank you so much mate finally a decent video comparison. That vertical space is so crucial for me since I amw woking with double page pdfs or word documents and with a 32" I can see both pages without them being cut. In the 34" UW I would struggle. Btw does anyone has a counter proof: I cannot seem to find any Ultra-Wide Monitor which has the same vertical space/height like this 32" monitor (around 39cm). the ultr awide monitors have vertical space for around (33cm).
@@kontikonsumi2028 @nilson gaspar Thanks for asking this question, is it 39cm because the ending resolution is 1600p and not 1440p resolution which is typically found in ultrawide monitors? But the 32" monitor you showed in the video was only 1440p resolution so I'm still confused how to work it out. I looked at the LG website Nilson provided above but there is no mention of 39cm in the specs..any help is appreciated😊
Qual voce achou melhor qualidade? o Lg ou o Dell?, e para mim que utilizo para redigir contratos no PAGE, qual ficaria melhor proporção e resolução para usar com o MacBook Pro m1, obrigado mais uma vez, aguardo sua ajuda
I have a 32 in Monitor and a 34-inch ultra-wide as well. I use the 32-inch monitor for movies and watching TH-cam videos ect. and I use the 34 in. ultra-wide for gaming. I like the fact that I have both. thanks for the video
I just got a 34” 21:9 3550x1440 samsung ultrawide lol i cant wait to see the difference between it and my 32” 16:9 1920x1080 😂😂😂😂 october 7th waiting for october 8th i ordered it online im so excited
Had this internal debate when upgrading from a 27inch. Found only a slight premium for an ultrawide (IPS) against the 32inch (IPS) when comparing prices . I decided on the 34 inch ultrawide curved. i love being able to have 3 windows open and find that my productivity is much better with the UW. Am a convert!!
32 inches for sure because when watching and playing games, most are gonna be set to 16:9 and if i had a 34 inch then id be stuck with huuuuge unused screen bezels which just sucks. id say it be better to have a second monitor thats much cheaper than 1 huge 34 inch monitor.
Man i love you , you are the only one speak about productivity and daily use , if i can ask you also if you compare the by different aspects ratio 21:9 and 32:9 and also the new monitor that come between those ratio hoping increase the vertical size like xenox coursera 45inch or the new lg 4g ... we need review from side productivity and daily use not for gaming use because not much content in youtub about that❤
Thank you for this comparison. It's the closest that I could get the idea of how ultrawide is in real life. Currently, I am using a 27" 4k and I want to buy another monitor for my dual display setup. I almost ordered the UW 34". It looks nice and clean on the desk as you mention but when working, I don't think I will enjoy a narrower vertical space. I go for a 4k 32" instead. ^_^
I've gone back and forth between 32 and 34 but I have to say, currently, the ultrawide is best for me. Windows 11 window snap has made productivity and other things more enjoyable for general web browsing/content consumption etc too. The 65/35 split view works well. Games just look so much better in 21:9 and i have a 7900xt so i get at least 120 frames on every game. I honestly believe the next upgrade for me will be the 38 inch 1600p. The best of all worlds. Same verticality as a 32 inch 16:9 but i'll wait until i upgrade the gpu years from now and hopefully by then, we'll have more 38 inch 1600p options. And if we don't get any new 1600p options, then the 39 inch 21:9 at 4k 240hz with a high end GPU will be the end game cream of the crop
Thank you bahhh!!! Got the samsung g55 ,32 inch now. ❤ I was lost between 2560 qhdvs 3440uwqhd . I need that vertical space and i hate black bars! Cheers brothaa!!
I don’t know where there are so many enthusiastic comments under this video, he did not fully disclose the topic, without mentioning that he compares 93 and 110 ppi, so which is better in the end?
ur videobreally solve my doubt tobget xiaomi ultra wide or philips 32 QHD , i will go for vertical space instead of ultrawide . most content are vertical , and i need to view a lot autocad and do some excel word , i think vertical space help me more . but i had to lost a lot gaming view with 16:9
The Best Monitors for MAC Computers:
nilsoncreative.com/best-monitors-for-mac
I made a list of the best monitors you can buy for Mac computers! You can check it out by clicking the link above.
I will be adding more monitors over time! If you have any suggestions, let me know.
I was using 32" for 3d modelling and upgraded to 34" ultrawide monitor and i gotta tell this; vertical space is not really good enough (same height of 27" of 16:9 monitors). I had to move my head to look to the sides with ultrawide and if i want to fix that by moving the monitor far away from me; height of the monitor seems not good enough to work with from that far. 3 months later i am switching back to normal 32" monitor and quite happy about it.
If you still want to use an ultrawide monitor then i recommend you to have a bigger sized one than 34" as video suggests; and have a curved one so you would need less head movement to look at the sides (because of the curve, sides will be closer to your viewing angle). Just be aware, with curved monitors you might have weird bending on straight lines which might be a problem for doing digital art with it.
Thanks for this
Cool mate, I am also working in the 3D industry and was hoping for an answer like that! Essentially I want to move from 2 monitors to only having one. The question I am asking myself is whether a 32“ monitor is fine for having 2 applications opened up next to each other. (Let‘s say you are working with some kind of software and browsing the web)
@@acrossARTS If you are using 27" monitors for your 2 monitor setup, 34" ultrawide might work for you. About having multi aplications on 16*9 screens, it might feel a bit tight. At the end i think you must try it yourself and decide which is working better for you. Good luck mate.
@@swordsmancity thanks for the answer! All the best to you as well!
Indeed whole "ultrawide" is complete BS. They're ultralow screens wasting lots of desk space for little vertical image size.
One of the rare videos which explains productivity between 16:9 vs 21:9.. thanks
Thank you! I appreciate that
+1. Really well explained, great video. I've gone for a 32"
@@mobywk The 34 inch ultrawide wasn't as large as I thought it would be. You made the right choice. Now if only it had the same vertical height as the 32 inches standard monitor---21:10 instead of 21:9 aspect ratio.
After I bought Samsung Odyssey G9 I can't look at my old 4K 16:9 monitor 😁
Very true. It shouldn't be this rare to find. Now if only someone could also do stress tests on GPUs with a regular monitor, ultrawide monitor, and super ultrawide monitor.
34 inch is a 27'' + wider while 32 inch is a 31 inch 21:9 + more height . for youtube + tv series a little bit smaller for movie compare to 34 inch. After using both i pick the 32 for everyday use
I don't know if I fully agree with the conclusions you drew. Though I appreciate you highlighting the video playback disadvantages for 21:9 monitors. I think productivity and video playback use cases are at odds with each other. 21:9 really does seem great if having multiple windows open simultaneously is something that would be useful. On the other hand, 16:9 monitors are pretty crap for that, necessitating multiple monitors if you must have that aspect ratio and multiple windows open. I'll have to try for myself
If having multiple windows opened, it’s what matters the most to you, then the ultrawide would be a better choice!
Nice 👍 , just what I was looking for.
Thank you!
So 38" 32:9 that has the vertical dimension same as a 30" monitor would be your ideal solution? LG has this and I'm sooo tempted between this and the 32:9 Samsung
honestly for people with this question, I'd go with the 48" lg c1 oled if you are able to sit far enough from it or create a custom desk like two desks together. it's cheaper than the 32:9's has better picture quality and more screen real estate vertical as well as same horizontally. because of the perfect blacks of oled you could actually just sit same distance and use only the bottom half of the display that would mirror what a 32:9 woould be. Plus next year they will come out with 42" oled 4k@120hz and low input lag so could even wait for that. the ultrawides are becoming obsolete with the new technology and will be just niche for looks rather than funtionality soon.
if only theres an ultrawide at the height of the 32inch
38" LG 21:9 has vertical of a 30", so pretty close
There is a 40” ultrawide available which is even closer, if not the same
If you're going to code in java, go for the ultrawide.
This one of the first videos I’ve made and I can’t believe it has this many views! I know my voice and tone is not the best yet but that was one of the reasons why I decided to create this channel, so I could improve my communication skills. Thank you for watching and if you found this video helpful, please consider subscribe so I can make more videos like this! 🙌
i think u re russian right? :D by the way thanks for the review, i exatly for the same dilemma, i need 3 tabs open, and be some playe for the desktop, maybe for me a 32:9 would be a better option? just don't know because, if i want to stream my pc via moonlight i have alay cange the 32:9 resolution to 16:9 when i would like to game on a laptop or tablet or pone? i really hesitant, becasue most of the time i want to be able to reach my desktop from anywhere the world without changing resolution and stuff, maybe ahve to stay with a 32 inch 16:9 or do you have any advice for that? thanks in advance! :)
I like your content and I have subscribed.
What surprises me about this channel is you have 500 subscribers and TH-cam still allowed you to monetize your channel.
How is this?
Minimum subscribers threshold is usually 1000
@@k.o.t.o.n. I'm actually Portuguese :D I think you should go with the one you find yourself using most of the time.
@@websitedesigner7158 Thanks for your support 🙌 My channel is not monetized yet, I have already met all the requirements except for the subscribers.
You sound fine. Keep at it.
I tried both. The 34" ultra wide is no good. Most websites and videos are optimized for 16:9 and not 21:9 and while you can put more websites side by side on the 34 you lose quite a lot of vertical space and it just looks odd. If they had a monitor that was the same height as the 32 and ultra wide, then that would work well I think.
They make 32 inch equivalent ultrawides but they are stupid expensive. They start at around $1600 usd and go up from there.
Thats basically a 38inch ultra wide.
40 inch ultrawide does that but it crazy expensive right now. 40 inch ultrawide have the same vertical real estate as a 32 inch standard monitor.
@@lunator100hd No it's 40 inch ultrawide.
@@valkryiebonfire9782 Well yes but I haven't seen any 40 inch ultra wide, 38 inch is the closer you can get.
The ultrawide 34'' has the same height as a regular 27'' monitor
I never found a more accurate video to my search!
Thank you 🙌
Exactly !
hell yeah me too!! cant believe this exists
Poor comparisson, 32" should be 4k. In 2k its obvious what is better but 4k makes a huge difference for productivity
@@VonMakaron yep, 32in 4K vs 34in 2K....
Me at the start of the video: There is something familiar about this accent
a minute later: Wait is that Djodje?
a minute later: C4 PEDRO TAMBÉM?
Hahaha finally someone who knows about them 👊
I finally found the review I was looking for. I'm always tired of game reviews.
Exactly the demonstration I was searching from yesterday. Good & precise ❤
Thank you 🙌
Thanks so much for this video. I had the ultrawide and thanks to your video picked up the 32” QHD and I’m enjoying it way more. I learned that I value the vertical room more than the horizontal for work and content viewing. Thanks again!
awwwwwwwwwwwe
I was in a fight for my life deciding between a 32" 4K vs a 34" WQHD version before I saw this video. I have an old Asus 34" and i've grown very fond of the screen real estate, but I agree the black bars during media consumption are a little disappointing, but also something I got used to. Thanks for the video, and I think i'll be trying out the 32"!
Is 32 good now?
How has the journey been so far? I'm in the same dilema; I would like to benefit from the clarity that the 4k offers and the width of a 34" for multitasking. Don't know which would be compromised?
@@Jay_Mawufemor bought a 32 inch LG...and I am using always 2 windows beside each others, without problems, only important thing to take care of! : by the 4K version....
@@Jay_Mawufemorhow you end up choosing? Same here
Very useful comparison Nilson, bravo! I myself used to consider between those two monitor types and finally chose the 16:9 as it naturally screen as well as the convenience. So lets choose wisely everyones! 🤑
Have an ultrawide and considering going back to 16:9 too much GPU power needed and the GPU market is not friendly atm.
Excellent video, I was very confused not knowing how to decide on 34 or 32 2k, it's nice to see that you answer most of the questions, nobody does that in the reviews, congratulations, GREAT GREAT video, greetings from Mexico ...... I should put subtitles option hehe
Never buy flat ultrawide - it's terrible for eyes, especially if you're a programmer. Most of the text windows align text by the left edge, that's why your eyes will target left side much more often and right eye will get damaged
I don’t get what you mean by ”losing vertical space” with ultrawide. They have the exact same amount of pixels, 1440, in height?
Same pixels but the physical vertical size is different. 32” is taller than 34”
Thanks for your video, the vertical size for 34 is awful! Good thing I watched this video. Now I will buy two 32 inches! 😊
So what monitor do you currently use, I noticed the ps5 and Xbox controllers? I’m looking for a fast refresh rate 32” or bigger for my M1 MacBook Pro and PS5 and am stuck on what to get!
34 inch ultrawide is the same height as what a 27 inch normal monitor will be. That's honestly big enough, 32 inch diagonal is overkill and too big for desk use. Width >> Height for me.
I think if you sit close this is probably true
It's no only about wider screen it's also about higher PPI that 34" have got that means you will see less pixels etc
Thompson Kenneth Thomas Elizabeth Lee Gary
Johnson Lisa Rodriguez Joseph Jackson Kimberly
So many games don't work well on 21:9..I'm so f*ing tired of black bars...I recently bought a 32" 2560x1440 240hz and I think its the perfect monitor after using my old 3440x1440 100hz for so long.I wish I had bought it earlier...
Thompson Jason Jackson Margaret Smith Jeffrey
Allen Gary Clark Maria Perez Jeffrey
Answer: 38" Ultrawide.
If you want ultra wide that’s the best solution 👌
Rodriguez Larry Martin Timothy Johnson Joseph
Awesome video, it wasn't very in depth but you mention the most critical points for sure. Nice job.
removing the plastic was a dick move ngl
Walker Larry Jackson Timothy Davis David
Anderson George Davis Laura Williams Michael
Lewis Thomas Clark Anna Thomas Steven
Anderson George Thompson John Wilson Steven
I am speechless... it starts by comparing which looks better :-)
Brown Nancy Gonzalez Carol Johnson Steven
I ordered an Ultrawide for PreSonus Studio One use.
love the video! It's brief and straight to the point. My 3 minutes well spent! Great job
Thank you!
You are answering the real questions! good job
Thanks man 🙌
Jones Anthony Gonzalez Melissa Young Brian
Jackson Cynthia Hernandez Thomas Hernandez Sandra
Brown Margaret Lopez Donna Garcia Charles
Lewis Brenda Young Richard Harris Robert
Perez Shirley Wilson Matthew Lewis Shirley
Garcia Jose Williams Jason Lewis Anthony
Lee Ronald Harris Edward Hernandez Michael
Lopez Sandra Miller Jeffrey Lopez Daniel
Perez Sandra Anderson Robert Jackson Helen
Garcia Edward Lee Amy Lewis Robert
Lewis Daniel Young Jason Lopez Carol
Anderson Jessica White Mary Lewis Donna
Hall Cynthia Martinez Sarah White Edward
The 32 inch has much lower pixel density.
You are totally right. For some reason its not mentioned at all
That is what making me worried,It will look as sharp as 24" 1080p... But just few increase in pixel density over ~102ppi wiil provide more clarity and shaprness even when gaming,I notice my 1080p 27 looks blurry because of 82 ppi...
simply and clear. very hard choice if you need game and work on you desktop
Perez Charles Clark Melissa Walker Ronald
My gripe with UW exactly. Those who are in ultra productive workflow go for the 32" 4K UF or the 38" or 40" UW. Believe me, you will appreciate the vertical space than the horizontal area. I own an LG 34WL5000 and thinking of getting either of the 2 mentioned previously.
Same here, I’m thinking of getting a 40 inches ultra wide.
@@NilsonCreative I guess you should, mate. It'll make a huge difference in your daily workflow.
I prefer 32" 4k Resolution due to (Ratio), most Movies/Stream I watch is not compatible with my 34" Ultrawide Monitor (I also used a extension called ULTRAWIDE Video to make the video fill entire screen, but it kinda zoom in all the movies/video and it make the video quality kinda wack even if its in 2k/4k quality)..So yah if your onto Watching/Stream also if your doing any office related work like excel then 32 inch 4k monitor is better, You will use scrollbar lesser than ultrawide. I have ultrawide 34 Inch (3440x1440).
@@toytulog576 Wow! 3440x1440 sounds like flagship LG WN-95. Meanwhile, what model do you prefer for 32", mate?
@@guganesan.ilavarasan I have LG 34GP83A-B (Ultra Wide 34") for a cheap price at craiglist for 300$..I do not look for brand for any 4k 32' since all of them pretty much have the same resolution and refresh rate stuck at 60hz..just waiting for any 32" 4k monitor to go down to 200-300.
is 40"ultrawide same height with 32"?
Hall Larry Hall Elizabeth Lopez Scott
Jackson Paul Hall Jose Lewis Angela
Lee Kenneth Robinson George Anderson Betty
I had Dell 27inch monitor but decided to get a bigger monitor so purchased the 34" LG monitor. After using it for a couple of days, I decided to return the 34", the lack of vertical height was showing up.I found reading or scroll down documents/web pages uncomfortable whereas on the 27inch I could see the whole thing and the layout seems more clear. Vertical height makes a massive difference in my opinion especially for people who do office work, need to read documents, use office/excel etc. I did end up buying a 32" monitor and to me its perfect. The height makes up for the lack of width. And on 32inch split screen is adequate enough
What is ur 32inch model name
Yes 32 inch the vertical height is advantage but for gaming purpose 34 inch feels good 😊
Hi as a programmer that codes, google and watch TH-cam tutorials a lot with occasional gaming like rocket league which one is better in your opinion? Ultra wide can have 3 windows comfortably but then the vertical height for the 32 inch means I can see more lines of code…. Kinda stumped right now
What did you go for? I'm the same as you but I cannot decide!
@@jadmurr8863 I ended up getting the Dell S3422dwg... Don't regret it the 3 windows come in real handy for comparing documents but even for 2 windows the second window I can open 2 code editors which is pretty cool
I went for the Dell S3422dwg for the width and am glad with my decision, I can compare 3 docs side by side and when it's 2 windows, I can have 2 code editors open on the second half on the screen,which is pretty cool imo
32 in h QHD is bad. only 4k
Thank you so much mate finally a decent video comparison. That vertical space is so crucial for me since I amw woking with double page pdfs or word documents and with a 32" I can see both pages without them being cut. In the 34" UW I would struggle.
Btw does anyone has a counter proof: I cannot seem to find any Ultra-Wide Monitor which has the same vertical space/height like this 32" monitor (around 39cm). the ultr awide monitors have vertical space for around (33cm).
Thank you mate! LG has 38” ultrawide monitors which has around 39cm of height. I’m planning on buying one in the future
@@NilsonCreative Can you tell the model number? Never saw a 38" monitor with 39cm of height!
@@kontikonsumi2028 The LG 38WN95C-W
@@NilsonCreative Thanks!
@@kontikonsumi2028 @nilson gaspar Thanks for asking this question, is it 39cm because the ending resolution is 1600p and not 1440p resolution which is typically found in ultrawide monitors? But the 32" monitor you showed in the video was only 1440p resolution so I'm still confused how to work it out. I looked at the LG website Nilson provided above but there is no mention of 39cm in the specs..any help is appreciated😊
Lee Sharon Hall Mary Gonzalez Donald
Walker Margaret Moore Margaret White Margaret
Qual voce achou melhor qualidade? o Lg ou o Dell?, e para mim que utilizo para redigir contratos no PAGE, qual ficaria melhor proporção e resolução para usar com o MacBook Pro m1, obrigado mais uma vez, aguardo sua ajuda
Anderson Jose Lewis Helen Brown John
I have a 32 in Monitor and a 34-inch ultra-wide as well. I use the 32-inch monitor for movies and watching TH-cam videos ect. and I use the 34 in. ultra-wide for gaming. I like the fact that I have both. thanks for the video
Thank you! That’s probably the best approach
Which better for Gaming?
@@newlife782 ultrawide is better for gaming
How do you organize your monitors though?
I just got a 34” 21:9 3550x1440 samsung ultrawide lol i cant wait to see the difference between it and my 32” 16:9 1920x1080 😂😂😂😂 october 7th waiting for october 8th i ordered it online im so excited
Had this internal debate when upgrading from a 27inch. Found only a slight premium for an ultrawide (IPS) against the 32inch (IPS) when comparing prices . I decided on the 34 inch ultrawide curved. i love being able to have 3 windows open and find that my productivity is much better with the UW. Am a convert!!
Great choice! When it comes to have multiple windows opened at same time, the UW is the way to go.
I just upgraded from 27" 1440p to 34 ultrawide. Both 1440 and same hight but extra width allows to have more panes open in visual studio etc.
16:9 is the best size
Best for what?
Fantastic review! I’ve been trying to come up to a conclusion in the past few weeks. Thank you so much!
Thank you! I’m glad I was able to help
Perfect! the kind of comparison that I want to know.
Amazing Quality Content Man! 💯👍💪
Thank you bro 🙌
@@NilsonCreative You’re welcome Bro! 👍💪
Very informative! You saved me from making a purchase and regretting it! Thank you!!!!
😂😂😂 Noone that uses ultrawide knows what they are doing... Go for 3 32'' curved 1440p monitors, THAT is the really cool and practical setup!
32 inches for sure because when watching and playing games, most are gonna be set to 16:9 and if i had a 34 inch then id be stuck with huuuuge unused screen bezels which just sucks. id say it be better to have a second monitor thats much cheaper than 1 huge 34 inch monitor.
Great Video …. Very well explained…. I will definitely go for 32 inch monitor …. Thank you very much. 😊
Awesome demo! I love the height of my 32" 4K monitor (16:9). I just wish they made a 4K monitor with built-in KVM so I could connect two PC's to it.
Man i love you , you are the only one speak about productivity and daily use , if i can ask you also if you compare the by different aspects ratio 21:9 and 32:9 and also the new monitor that come between those ratio hoping increase the vertical size like xenox coursera 45inch or the new lg 4g ... we need review from side productivity and daily use not for gaming use because not much content in youtub about that❤
Thank you for this comparison. It's the closest that I could get the idea of how ultrawide is in real life.
Currently, I am using a 27" 4k and I want to buy another monitor for my dual display setup.
I almost ordered the UW 34". It looks nice and clean on the desk as you mention but when working, I don't think I will enjoy a narrower vertical space.
I go for a 4k 32" instead. ^_^
You made the right call, I’m glad I was able to help!
I was pondering which one to get: 32 or 34 ? Your video is very helpful to me and I decided to go with 32 LG. Thank you so much.
Which one? What model 🙂
LG 32UN880-B
@@Marc_Yu Thank you. 😊
@@arvi8843 You're welcome.
I've gone back and forth between 32 and 34 but I have to say, currently, the ultrawide is best for me. Windows 11 window snap has made productivity and other things more enjoyable for general web browsing/content consumption etc too. The 65/35 split view works well.
Games just look so much better in 21:9 and i have a 7900xt so i get at least 120 frames on every game. I honestly believe the next upgrade for me will be the 38 inch 1600p. The best of all worlds. Same verticality as a 32 inch 16:9 but i'll wait until i upgrade the gpu years from now and hopefully by then, we'll have more 38 inch 1600p options. And if we don't get any new 1600p options, then the 39 inch 21:9 at 4k 240hz with a high end GPU will be the end game cream of the crop
Decision was made for me at 1:15. Thank you for this review.
You’re welcome bro 👊
cabo verde respect
Sold, nice video, I was tossing up between the 2 and decided with the 32inch, thanks
Thanks for letting me know! It’s good to see people making decisions based on my video. Thank you!
Thank you bahhh!!! Got the samsung g55 ,32 inch now. ❤ I was lost between 2560 qhdvs 3440uwqhd . I need that vertical space and i hate black bars! Cheers brothaa!!
I don’t know where there are so many enthusiastic comments under this video, he did not fully disclose the topic, without mentioning that he compares 93 and 110 ppi, so which is better in the end?
But the LG 32 is 4k! UW is 2k. No big deal for gaming but super big difference when working.
Why they just dont create 37 inches monitors 16:9? That will solve all problems.
What about gaming ?
This is what I was searching for. You compared very well bro.
For games and movies - 21:9. For work, fast fps game and youtube - 16:9
ur videobreally solve my doubt tobget xiaomi ultra wide or philips 32 QHD , i will go for vertical space instead of ultrawide . most content are vertical , and i need to view a lot autocad and do some excel word , i think vertical space help me more . but i had to lost a lot gaming view with 16:9