7 WAYS The SUBARU CROSSTREK Is BETTER Than The HONDA HRV...And 6 WAYS It's WORSE

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 3 มิ.ย. 2024
  • Subaru Crosstrek or Honda HRV?
    -
    Get your lids and eyewear here...20% off everything!
    Blenders Eyewear: glnk.io/vy905/matthew20
    Code: DOWNSHIFT
    Melin Headwear:
    The above links are affiliate links where Downshift will receive a kick-back from your order
    --
    Follow Downshift to see what's coming next!
    FB: / dwnshftmke
    IG: downshiftme...
    TT: / downshift_media
    Website: downshiftmedia.us/
    --
    0:00 - Intro
    0:32 - Power/Performance
    SUB: 2.0 F4 152 hp 145 lbft
    2.5 F4 182 hp 178 lbft
    No turbo.
    HRV: 2.0 I4 158 hp 138 lbft
    No turbo
    Both SUB engines get to 60 quicker than HRV
    Subbie wins
    1:34 - Hybrid
    Neither offers
    Subbie used to offer a PHEV - so they could again
    Old one did 17 miles of range
    So with same engines in the new one easy to add
    2:22 - Fuel economy
    HRV: 26/32 fwd
    25/30 awd
    SUB: 2.0 27/34
    2.5
    Subbie wins since it gets better fuel economy in the base 2.0 WITH awd than the HRV gets with fwd
    3:13 - AWD & Offroad stuff
    HRV fwd base, awd option
    Any offroad stuff?
    SUB awd std, X mode
    Wilderness version
    Trans oil cooler, tires, and half inch lift
    This was always going to be a pretty easy one for the Subbie
    4:33 - Ext design
    In all honesty i dont LOVE the look of either of the cars, but I guess if i had to choose, it’d be the Crosstrek
    I’ve just seen more examples and images online of them in wilderness trim or in some interesting offroad spec that looks more badass
    The HRV is certainly more expensive and elegant looking so again, it’s pretty much a wash here
    But since I have to offer a point, it’s going to the Subbie
    5:07 - Price
    HRV: 25,395 start
    SUB: 26,290
    But AWD is going to put it over the subbie in all trims
    5:47 - Versatility & towing
    HRV not rated for towing - nothing on honda media site
    SUB mine here is the small engine so only 1500 lbs
    BUT with the big engine and trans cooler up to 3500 lbs…allegedly
    Just context, the bigger CRV is rated at 1500 lbs
    Subbie is a beast here
    7:05 - Interior build and quality
    Subbie is much better than last gen
    And dazzles with a big center screen BUT it’s materials and quality
    HRV wins
    8:17 - Tech
    HRV gets std 7 in digital cluster and 7 in infotainment
    EVERY trim gets ACP and AA
    Going up to the EXL here gets you the 9 in center screen
    Wireless charger
    Wireless acp and aa
    And 8 speakers
    The Subbie gets dual 7 in touchscreen in the center
    ACP & AA
    4.2 in cluster TFT
    BUT you can option up to the premium, sport, limited and wilderness trims
    For the big 11.6 in infotainment screen
    Up to 10 speakers with harmon kardon for limited trim
    The subbie technically does offer a bigger screen and more speakers BUT even still i prefer the resolution, graphics, and responsiveness of the Honda system…plus i’ve had issues with Subbie bluetooth connections in the past
    10:03 - Safety
    HRV was IIHS top safety pick +
    Subbie was…not
    But for this year you do get eyesite across all trims
    The driver assist suite here is decent but it hugs the right lane line which makes overtaking semis stressful
    Honda sensing brings loads of STD equipment to HRV…and it all works really seamlessly
    10:36 - Trunk space
    HRV has significantly bigger trunk
    Ironic since subbie is the camping brand and to go camping you need a lot of stuff
    The new HRV for this gen gets noticeably bigger than last year
    biggest in segment
    While the subbie gets a little shorter and narrower..a weird thing to see
    But the HRV doesnt get mountains or stream designs in its plastic and mats…
    11:24 - Rear seats
    The crosstrek isn’t completely uninhabitable by any means but its not exactly a place i want to spend a lot of time as someone over 6 foot
    The HRV is palatial in comparison and i could more comfortably spend more time back here
    It’s the same thing as the trunk, but the HRV is segment leading here on interior volume
    12:27 - drive/livability
    This point probably wont come as a huge shock to anyone, but the Subaru just isnt as refined
    You can tell it’s the more affordable car
    The cabin isn’t as isolated
    The engine sounds pretty coarse
    I mean it’s not BAD
    BUT then immediately behind the wheel of the Honda it feel half a tier up
    Hrv is better balanced
    more refined
    The engine may have less power, but the driving experience is more natural
    It’s easier and more pleasant to drive the HRV
    -
    14:01 - Conclusion
  • ยานยนต์และพาหนะ

ความคิดเห็น • 67

  • @dwnshft
    @dwnshft  9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Special thanks to our Patrons for their support of the channel! Subaru Crosstrek or Honda HRV?

  • @kingkiril
    @kingkiril 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +32

    Subaru crosstrek hands down! I love the ride quality. Easy to park. Better looking in my opinion. Better gas mileage. Visibility. Sport trim on crosstrek is the best. I really got everything I need in my Subaru crosstrek.

    • @dwnshft
      @dwnshft  9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      glad to hear you're liking your car!

    • @user-po5bg8cq1g
      @user-po5bg8cq1g 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      I am a huge Honda fan but I chose the Crosstrek Sport over the HRV for the same reasons you mentioned. I had waited 2 years for the HRV redesign but was very disappointed by how the exterior of the new generation looks.

    • @turo3066
      @turo3066 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@user-po5bg8cq1gIn the same boat as you. Bought a 24 Limited and it's a perfect Cinderella vehicle for an active empty nester. The lack of power is overrated. The 2.5 is more than enough.

    • @johnnybgood7812
      @johnnybgood7812 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I’m currently driving a ‘21 Outback which I love but seriously tempted to downsize to the new Crosstrek next year. I think they’ve got the styling just right and, as I no longer need the space of the Outback it’ll be a toss up between that or the ‘25 Forester.

    • @rolin3685
      @rolin3685 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Y que tal yo quiero canbiar que tal te fue​@@user-po5bg8cq1g

  • @thewilberforce
    @thewilberforce 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    Drove them both. Went over them with a fine tooth comb. The Crosstrek won. And I am really happy with it.

    • @dwnshft
      @dwnshft  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      excellent!

    • @antonfernando8409
      @antonfernando8409 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Thanks, thinking seriously to get a crosstrek.. just long wait time.

  • @edsmith9855
    @edsmith9855 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Cant believe how "slow" the HRV is compared to the stats. It actually has more HP than the base Crosstrek, but is down on torque. It is not really slow, but everybody disses on the Crosstrek base engine, while the HRV is actually a bit slower, with no optional engine. Both are nice though. Personally, I would choose the Crosstrek for at least as much power, better AWD system, and styling. The HRV just looks kind of weird to me.

  • @ZeGermanHam
    @ZeGermanHam 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Standard AWD on the Crosstrek is a HUGE distinction that cannot be understated. And if you option AWD on the HR-V, there are comparison videos on TH-cam that show it being almost comically incompetent off road when comparing to a Crosstrek. Agree that the HR-V has a nicer interior, though.

    • @emilioagudelo5787
      @emilioagudelo5787 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Compare with AWD Rav4 of Toyota .. Crosstrek is far behind , even 20% of Subaru is Toyota .. but cheap if you compare equipements and fuel .. on hybrid 2024 Crosstrek .. the double of Hybrid 2023 Rav4 !

    • @lauraandrews8319
      @lauraandrews8319 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      My girlfriend has an HRV, it’s not at home off the pavement. Useless. The Crosstrek is better but the CVT and head gasket issues will stop me from owning one.

    • @tommywagemann9512
      @tommywagemann9512 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      But I don’t think the hr-v is really marketed as an “off road” vehicle. It’s more for people that loved the civic but need more space and awd. Subarus are known for their rally history and awd capabilities so of course it’ll be better. I feel like I’ve definitely gotten what I’ve paid for with my hr-v. Does just fine in the ice and snow if you’re not off roading. All of my buddies that hunt have trucks or Subarus because they’re always driving through farm land and driving through woods to get to their blind. So it’s definitely up to what your needs are. Also when has Honda ever been known for its awd🤷🏻‍♂️

  • @vinnpu
    @vinnpu 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    I turned down the HR-V for the 2024 Crosstrek. No regrets!

    • @dwnshft
      @dwnshft  9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Nice!

  • @edisontrent5244
    @edisontrent5244 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    When winter comes can you do a impreza / crosstrek snow review? Great to have a reviewer in WI! Thanks for the comparison!

  • @robertwolf6412
    @robertwolf6412 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Wait wait i have a 24 sport do they all come with hill decent? 😊

  • @jakeywakey4424
    @jakeywakey4424 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I’m highly considering both vehicles. And im very excited😊

  • @Topaz2022
    @Topaz2022 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    I think the interior in the Crosstrek looks better.

    • @dwnshft
      @dwnshft  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They did do a lot to improve the cabin this year so that’s great to see 👍

  • @debdixon6272
    @debdixon6272 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    My coworker has a Crosstrek and loves it!

    • @dwnshft
      @dwnshft  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Nice!

  • @danmcdonald726
    @danmcdonald726 18 วันที่ผ่านมา

    They make the HR-V in other countries (ZR-V) in a hybrid it's just not in the states. I just bought an HR-V and I didn't consider Subaru, after owning a '12 WRX there's alot of build quality issues, I liken subaru to Hyundai. One thing I value is interior road noise. I've opted for the EX-L and at 3k miles I'm getting 31mpg average and my commute is about 12mi's so it's not all highway, I think it actually gets better in the city.

  • @c4snipar
    @c4snipar 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Post price paid for a 2024 Subaru Crosstrek premium (before fee if possible)

  • @tinker1148
    @tinker1148 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Crosstrek hands down. You didn’t mention that the new Crosstrek hasn’t been tested yet by IIHS but the previous model was top safety pick plus. Also, the HRV don’t have any USB or center armrest for the rear seat! How can you screw that up in 2023?!

  • @jonj77
    @jonj77 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    So frustrating that we're waiting for Civic and HR-V hybrids in USA. Both have been available for so long in Europe and Aus. Would have been very interested in those vehicles, and getting impatient!

  • @lorenschwiderski
    @lorenschwiderski 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

    HR-V has multi-port fuel injection, thus no gunk-up like direct-injection found on CrossTrek. Subaru CrossTrek has the superior always on AWD system, good seating, great safety., and more. The 2.5 engine has a relatively new and complicated TCV -- could have failures down the road, though all cars have possible points of failure, The HR-V is half second slow in 0-60. The CrossTrek is a safe car - look at Death Rates in Cars and Insurance Loss Claims data. Subaru for the win? The HR-V is redesigned, thus too early to tell as to real-world safety, though if you are a crash dummy, the new HR-V will treat you kind --- maybe good for humans too. I think the look, inside and out and that multi-port injection catch my attention. Long lasting? Could be!

  • @jeffreyfitch1006
    @jeffreyfitch1006 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    All I know is when I want to go offroading..........,
    Actually I don't care about offroading & by extension don't need awd cars ever.

    • @mnrodriguez
      @mnrodriguez หลายเดือนก่อน

      Same here!

  • @brucet1043
    @brucet1043 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I had a Crosstrek nearly 2 months now.I can say Crosstrek better than Honda HRV.

  • @plightn
    @plightn 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Make a hybrid hrv and we'll revisit :)

    • @dwnshft
      @dwnshft  8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That’s how I’m feelin

  • @lynellethompson5521
    @lynellethompson5521 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Does the HRV have wide track tires like the CR-V?? Hate them!! They are too expensive and the CR-V eats up tires!! CRV's are so hard on tires!! The Subaru is also easier on the knees!! The bumps don't hurt like they do in a CR-V!! I will see how the winter handling is but with the CR-V the redesign lost all winter handling!! After a new CR-V I wouldn't even consider an HR-V. The old CR -V drove like a lumber wagon but it got you through the snow!! If they ever bring back the Element I might consider a Honda again. I've had an Accord and x2 CR-V's. I also hate having the screen up on the dash!! Good thing I switched to a Subaru Crosstrek!!

  • @lorenschwiderski
    @lorenschwiderski 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

    HR-V seats hard and thinly padded. Go CrossTrek Premium with base engine, good seats, AWD all the time. Subaru safety!

  • @bionicA16
    @bionicA16 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    i think subaru is more comfortable because the rear suspension is multilink

  • @proflex310
    @proflex310 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    US HRV design is ugly as hell !

  • @bryanmchugh1307
    @bryanmchugh1307 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I already have a 2018 Crosstrek Limited. It does what it is supposed to do and it does it very well. I would actually take the Honda in this case. The interior is just that much nicer.

  • @twisted_panties
    @twisted_panties หลายเดือนก่อน

    Honda everyday, Subaru is OK if you are happy with burning lots of oil between services.

  • @soundknight
    @soundknight หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I like the feeling of a boxer

    • @jaroslawakmiot666
      @jaroslawakmiot666 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Agreed. More "assuring" drive.....

  • @henryhenrywang5333
    @henryhenrywang5333 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    2024 Subaru crosstrek has Hybrid version.

  • @tjj5337
    @tjj5337 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Tested them both. I bought the Subaru!

    • @dwnshft
      @dwnshft  4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Congrats!

    • @tjj5337
      @tjj5337 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@dwnshft Thank you ! Great video. The Honda is too low to the ground for an SUV

  • @knightryder3757
    @knightryder3757 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for your opinions. Lol

  • @ELCID612
    @ELCID612 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It’s a dog bowl not a cup holder 🥲

    • @dwnshft
      @dwnshft  หลายเดือนก่อน

      I got it right in the Crosstrek wilderness video this year 😅

  • @RicardoLopez-zw1st
    @RicardoLopez-zw1st 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Subaru ❤❤

  • @michaelbell7914
    @michaelbell7914 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Which one has spare tire?

    • @rorocyr2693
      @rorocyr2693 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The Crosstrek has one.

    • @tommywagemann9512
      @tommywagemann9512 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hr-v has one too

  • @abbasahmadi8689
    @abbasahmadi8689 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Honda

  • @joellomeli2035
    @joellomeli2035 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I am impressed with the Cross Trek numbers. My only question is, why do they make them to ugly. This cross over has everything to Excell the HRV, however, it looks to outdated. I wouldn't drive one.

  • @lucastherexcat
    @lucastherexcat 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Both cars have CVTs, dependability is important, CVTs are junk. Fan boys will say that CVTs last as long as regular automatic (they don't), they won't mention they cost double to fix. Do not drink the CVT kool-aid .

    • @vinnpu
      @vinnpu 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Now drive my second vehicle with a cvt. Never had a problem and I like the smooth performance. To each their own.

    • @turo3066
      @turo3066 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      CVTs have come a long way. There are plenty out there with over 200k miles even shitty ones like from Nissan. CVTs are probably more sensitive to lack of maintenance though.

    • @lucastherexcat
      @lucastherexcat 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@turo3066 After looking at Auto trader it seems that new Crosstreks are available with standard trannies, who knew?

    • @lucastherexcat
      @lucastherexcat 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Overall CVT failure rate is higher that conventional automatics. They cost twice as much to repair. No reason to own a CVT.@@turo3066

    • @tommywagemann9512
      @tommywagemann9512 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@turo3066yes this exactly. You absolutely NEED to change the trans fluid at least every 20k miles. And I wouldn’t keep a cvt over 125k miles just to be safe. At 125k miles most cvt’s will start shifting harder or slipping and then it’ll be much harder to resell or trade in

  • @lauraandrews8319
    @lauraandrews8319 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Both of these vehicles have CVT transmissions that are not up to the task. And what is worse, Honda can’t even fix them. I know this from first hand experience, The CVT in my HRV went out at 23,000 miles, and it took the dealership 6 months to fix it. Total garbage, do yourself a favor, get a Toyota.

    • @OsBMXandHotrods
      @OsBMXandHotrods 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The corolla cross has a cvt also. :-(

    • @lauraandrews8319
      @lauraandrews8319 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@OsBMXandHotrodsAt least Toyota knows how to build a CVT, but I still don't want one.

  • @deanmichael1279
    @deanmichael1279 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I am 1000% not kidding when I say you couldn’t pay me to own a Subaru. If Subaru contacted me and offered me a car. I am not kidding when I say I would turn it down.

  • @hesham3326
    @hesham3326 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    .
    ⚫🦢⚫ HR-V ⚫🦢⚫
    . 👁️🗿👁️ 🏁 .
    . 🕳️ 🏆 🕺🏻 .

  • @Noname0670
    @Noname0670 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The HRV looks way better. The Subaru is ugly.