I think this NFT bussiness is very shady or as you said in your video it is extremly smelly. I am thinking its for laundering money used in bloody paramilitary operations. I dont know. These NFT guys need to be investigated by the IRS or something lol.
Because you have an exact copy of their image, with no differences or indications that you didn't buy the link to the image, they don't even own the image, just a Blockchain related to it.
one person cried “THIEF!” to a bunch a people right-clicking and screenshotting, dunno why they’re upset, it should’ve made the value go up right? unless the market has nothing that works that way and it dilutes the price but they can’t say that cause more people will do it if they say that.
I can see why furries would be infuriated that they're stealing their art. I mean, at least they put actual artistic talent and effort into their art pieces and actually charge smaller prices when doing adopts and commissions. NFT *"artists"* just click on a randomizer and pick which one is the stupidest.
Yea, like it or not, some furry oc’s take a lot of *actual human thought* to think of and create. I would be mad too if some stupid “artist” stole it too
I own land and the government has a piece of paper that says I can shoot someone for trespassing on it under the right circumstances. I still have to pay taxes but crypto has allowed me to keep that to a minimum lol.
If they don’t want random people to screenshot the NFT, there is something called “Commisions", where they pay and then give them the art without the hassle of screenshots.
You know the whole NFT selling business is going well when the NFT bro invites someone to drink with them and he won't even pay for the fucking drinks.
They cant, even if they're rich in crypto, itd take years to sell it all off. But most likely they are broke asf cuz NFT is a "get rich quick"-type scam
I love how the whole point of the NFT system is to verify who "owns" that image, and yet they still get angry for no reason when people right click it. It's absolutely hilarious.
Yes, are dummies, i don't care if you screenshot my NFT, no problem, because it's not your digital private property until you have it, but yeah, it's funny right click and save image 🤣
I mean, the whole point of the blockchain is to prove that "yes, I paid for this, I have this image in my wallet". The NFTs are just shitty image representations of a crypto coin. Therefore, there is absolutely no reason to be upset that people saved your duplicate of the image. People who get upset about right-clicking are complaining about a problem that doesn't exist because they're scared that the big ego money they wasted won't be worth it anymore. NFT investors are stupid
Comissions are what NFTs wish they were A comission is when you pay an artist to bring your idea into the world, they get money, you get your imagination as a piece of art NFTs on the other hand You buy some weird animal doing weird shit for 200 grand and then get scammed
The thing with the furry art is that the "stolen" art was resold. Nobody claims to screenshot an nft to sell it, but screenshotting furry art with the intent to practically resell it is different.
@@Coffeekitty7 or they sketch it traditionaly and then transfer to digital form Dude did a literal art theft, those furry pfp were mostly done by the person or bought from an artist and they, you know, own the piece and rights to it. Unlike NFTs
@@cumscum As someone who owns furry art, stealing it and selling it as an NFT is noT much better than a guy stealing a Amazon package and flipping it on eBay.
Ok so let me get this straight. Nfts is basically just there to give you a piece of code for you to own. Not the image itself, but a code generated to associate for that image. So legally speaking someone that owns the nft has no leagal basis to sue people that screenshot their nft. Bruh this is stupid just get a commission.
Here to promote that you should support your favourite artist by commissioning them.. It could be as LOW as 5$...depending on the art. How cool is that!? And cheap. On the higher... More expensive side.. It could reach up to 200-300$..maybe more depending on the artist. But hey.. Thats waaaaay cheaper than tasteless images. Not to mention... Its FULLY your ownnnn customization!!!
@Potato You know, since writing this comment, I've kind of changed my tune. All the things I've mentioned are still true but it's become very clear that NFTs are not being created as a new means of funding artists, or solving any actual problems. In their current form, they really are just a bigger fool scam. They didn't have to be, but they are. I still think people should be educated on what NFTs actually are versus what the discourse paints them as. But that doesn't mean what they actually are has any value at all.
Okay, so im gonna make women pay me for dinner and try to scam them and also probably making her my girlfriendt this plan cant fail Oh shet only dudes are coming i guess i am going to specifiy
You guys ever heard about about the giant stone coin? It was a big cylindrical thing with a hole in the middle, back in a time where the size of a coin was equal to its value. Problem was that, one day, this giant coin was transported on a boat that ended up sinking. So obviously the coin gets lost to the depth of the sea, yeah? But the thing is...people still traded that coin. They couldn't physically _have_ the coin, of course, what with it being at the bottom of the ocean. Nor, most likely, could they confirm that the coin still existed or, in fact, had ever existed to begin with after a long time had passed. Yet people still traded ownership of it. All the buyer had to do was believe they were to become the owner of a _very big coin_ that was at the bottom of the ocean, _seriously dude it's there and it's VERY big dude trust me,_ and it was worth lots and thus was worth owning. Of course, without the coin physically present, the only thing proving ownership of said coin was some flimsy paperwork and word-of-mouth-- paperwork which could be forged or falsified and word-of-mouth that could turn sour and easily devalue the coin through disbelief of its value and existence. And thus, the big stone coin at the bottom of the ocean became valueless. This is the story I think about whenever someone brings up NFTs.
@@liamwhite3522 Holy cow I forgot abt that episode! Considering the the creators of of Spongebob were marine biologists who loved to include allusions to real life events and marine facts, I don't doubt that at all! Edit: looking it up I found even more info on the story of the stone coin! It originated from the island of Yap, where many coins were too large to even be moved! Because of this, the economic system has been compared to Bitcoin because the coins themselves often could not be physically given to their owners. It was only by word of mouth within the small island communities that gave the stone money any buying power and confirmed its current owner. This system would obviously break down on a larger scale as the honor system would be more likely to fall apart as misinformation would be brought in by poorly intentioned individuals, causing the coins to lose value and their ownership to become muddied. And it was, in fact, the inspiration for Mr Krabs' dime!
That is a sad truth of how humanity is still that gullible under their own terms of what they find value in, the island people are okay because I respect the fact they were into stones. But this time, this is just pure stupidity.
As an artist who does art commissions, there was a time when a client (my classmate) told me that I should do NFTs for the money. The fact that he said it confidently when I was doing HIS homework for him as a commission really amused me. Some people really are stupid down to the bone.
This legit makes me want to create an image, sell it as an NFT for a stupidly high price (probably like 100k, 150k), and then as soon as someone buys it and it's all settled, publicly shame the idiot for buying a low effort image for such a high amount then dip out for a while and enjoy my money. Is it a scam? Yeah, it is. But isn't this whole NFT bullshit the biggest scam in recent times?
How is this a scam? In this context the costumer is recieving the product while being fully aware of what the product's all about. Also, no1 will buy an nft for that high from a regular person/artist, NFTs are seen as one of the best ways to launder money right now, they are laundering money while profiting off people that jumped in from the hype. The rich get richer while the poor get a png, all of this while damaging the planet.
Reminds me, I saw an NFT on sale for about $12k. It was basically punk style pixel art. For 12 thousand dollars. A simple right click and save image got it for free. How interesting.
The dumb thing about NFTs is you really dont own the image, you only own the blockchain associated WITH the image, which just means you can sell that blockchain to someone else but thats about all an NFT gives you, which is ridiculous for something so expensive and useless. In the United States, its literally a fraction of the price to actually copyright an image/artwork which would actually give real legal ownership.
@@Chinchillys tbh furries are just weebs but like anthro shit, both get disgusting insults, both like cartoons, and both make extremely well crafted art, and both have weird kinks This is all still better than NFTs, atleast when a furry buys one of those ugly fursuits its physical and can even be unique, i dont like furries but lets be real, they arent too far apart from weebs
the way i see it, alot of “cringe” communities are cringe cuz a small 5% group of that community produces 95% of cringe. with nft bros… 99% of the community produces 100% of the cringe
"Sells" This shit straight money laundering. Remember that whole thing around vintage copies of Mario on the NES going for like $100k, but the founders of that "grading" company were just buying each other's shit to inflate prices artificially and create hype? That's what's happening here with the really big sales. NFT's are just a scam, that's it. Zero value.
That's right, nobody wants NFT's, they only try to make quick money selling it over and over again It's like Bitcoin but at least these kryptos are money or something like that
Crypto's really bad for illegal stuff, though. Blockchains lay out a trail leading right to you. All the authorities would have to do is look. That's why illegal shit is done with cash. Anyone who knows what they're doing doesn't want a computer anywhere near it.
I feel bad for the furries kinda, imagine making art and then getting it stolen... The difference between us screenshotting nft's and them stealing furry art is that furry art was made by a person, it took them effort to create... While NFT's are just obtained by paying (Or screenshotting)
i think the avarage furry artist can draw you better art for $10 dollars than the 10k nfts... the art is very cheap and usually of extremely good quality, trust me id know
Some are even on levels of Renaissance paintings on how detailed they are for Jesus Christ... Rich mainstream people are really the worst waste of oxygen in this planet
The guy who made my profile picture made me pay only $45, and I’d rather have this than literally any NFT. Even better, I could make my own pfp (which I did for discord and Twitter), and if I had the time you bet your ass I’d offer to do commissions.
At least with (most) furries, the art and characters are hand drawn, colored and designed with unique features. The NFT characters are literally the same base with different expressions and clothes.
It's beautiful to see every communities that usually fight each others join forces in their shared hatred of NFTs. Nothing unites enemies more than a common one.
I would never commission or wear furry art myself, but i think there is something of a difference between saving an NFT to use as a profile picture as a joke and taking art that people paid for/actually put effort into and pasting it into Photoshop and reselling it.
There's really a difference in just screenshoting any digital art and saving it to your computer, maybe using it as a desktop background or something, and screenshoting it and reselling it or claiming it as your own, using it as your pfp on a professional account, etc. Most furry artists or furries don't care if you save their art, or do anything with it as long as you acknowledge who the owner/artist is and don't try to claim its yours.
@@QueenGlory13 and/or attempt to sell said artwork to make random merchandise (or in this case, resell as an NFT). [Without permission] I'm an artist and if I saw that happen to my art, boy oh boy DMCA files are going someone's way 👊🏽🧍♂️
In the word of Jontron: “Well if it’s this easy to become an entrepreneur, I tell you what, I’ll be one myself!” Time to take a picture of my mailbox, pixelize it, and sell it for 7 thousand dollars
Nobody is gonna unironically buy an image from the internet when you could just screenshot it or move the image to the search tab and then download it.
I feel like the only reason that NFT’s are targeting furries is because their art is better and well priced but they “copied them” even though technically their copying furries
@@Damascene_ right I would run for Reddit mod but 1) I’m a girl 2) I’m autistic and my brain can get weird at times 3) I’m not fat 4) I’ve got a GF (not anime)
I personally think our way of trying to reason to these "NFT bros" as if they were genuinely collecting the art is wrong. These guys don't "collect art" and definitely are not "supporting artists", that is because they aren't there for the "art", they're there for the "value" they made up for these thingies They just want to be rich, it's just a scheme of very greedy people fabricating "scarcity thus its valuable" to things that shouldn't just so they can become "billionares". So they'll never be in for the art, they're just greedy, the guy who buys the NFT doesn't think about "owning", they just want to sell it for a higher price
@@Tanaka1168 Welcome to the 2020's, a sad and depressing parody of the glorious human race, where we all go crazy and eat each other up until everything's hit rock bottom. If this continues, and mark my words when I say this, the coming rest of the century is only gonna get worse and worse. A civilization lost to corporate greed.
@@Ben-mw9vz Things weren't good, but throughout human history millions of people have worked hard and even gave their life to make the society a better place, a place that they could live happily in, not a utopia of course but not something far from it. Today we are living in one of the most comfortable time period of human history ever and this is what we are living in, a soon to be corporate dystopia ruled by monopolies with celebrity billionaires. It's a shame what we have become, what we are becoming, and what our impact on the planet itself if. If our ancestors, on whose shoulders we stand, saw all of this, I'm pretty sure a good amount of them would be very disappointed.
2:23 the funny thing is that someone actually tried this but then got a DMCA takedown for trying to make NFTs out of other people’s art Hopefully the reality of how worthless NFTs are catches up to these guys
I cant remember where i read this analogy. But... its not my original thought. " buying a nft is like going to the grocery store, buying groceries, but leaving them at the store and walking away only with a receipt" you bought a receipt.
they'll buy NFTs, we'll laugh at them as the fad dies, and then someone will figure out how to do something actually cool and useful with the technology behind them instead of "I sold another monkey"
Also people said that bitcoin was fad, the monkey's NFTs are shit, don't have creativity, only a famous creator, there are many NFTs beautiful and others categories, trading cards, sports, art, music...
@@hueyg206 that would be fan emulator game then? 🤔 You can play expensive cards like ten thousand dragon in yugioh right now with ygopro, for free. Is that ten thousand dragon you play in ygopro play exactly like the actual card? Yes And i don't think people are brave enough to play 3k$ card in real duel, it is likely to stay in the binder for the rest of its life.
2:24 "I screenshot an image with no watermark that's copy/pasted from a base model that you simply customized." "Okay, then I'm free to commit literal art theft on your actual hard work." Fixed that meme comic for the NFT bros, no need to thank me guys. ✌️
Guys please just commission a artist. It’s worth 70-80 dollars for high quality art, you can mostly choose what you want, and it helps the artist get money. A lot better then this stinky NFT stuff
A furry is an artist's friend when it comes to commissions, both can have a win-win situation, one pays good and one creates what the other one paid for.
Thats so true. Imagine getting 100k for your college from your family and you just used the money for an nft on a the internet. Thats so sad litteraly, you will get disowned
NFT won't last long. It's just another sudden hype and its values nothing. In my country, we have almost similar case in 2016-2018 where people collecting gem stones and expect the values will skyrocket. In reality, those gem stones are just for show. Sure, in early hype there's some gemstones that worth up to $ 10k, but that won't last long.
It reminds me a bit of the tulip mania, and we all know where that went. If you don't, it went the way that NFTs most likely will: A bubble that bursts.
They remind me of POGs, Beanie Babies, and Furbies back in the 90s. At least those had some real scarcity, despite being useless tchotchkes and knicknacks.
The bumblebee art that guy bought? They could’ve got it as a poster, or bought the rights to it to legally own the copyright to it so if anyone else uses it you can ask them to take it down, you could commission an artist to get a cool bit of art or just support the artist who made it with a modest patreon donation or something But no, that shit costs more than a car..
Tbh it's just the same as a csgo skin, except you don't actually even own it since anyone can just screenshot it and repost it as of now, so it's like a having a rare csgo skin that someone borrows, duplicates and just spam all over, basically worthless. But hey if i take shit in my hand and sell it on ebay for 5000$ if someone actually wants it that bad to buy it then it's worth that. The thing the celebrities nft guys don't seem to realize is the only reason their NFTS are so expensive is because they paid a shit ton for it, and that doesn't mean anyone else after them would like to buy it for that price again from then.
@@beepboopbeepp and that you can’t even use in a game or have any sense of completion or joy or fun of having it cause let’s face it, it’s literally just bought to be sold for more money, which is very sad.. more sad than paying irl money for a CSGO skin
Man it's even funnier that they can't even choose what they want in the image. With the drawing skill of an elementary school student you can just find the base, add anything you want, any expression you want, for free, and you actually own the image itself.
i don't get why people don't just turn already existing "rare" nfts into their own nft like there's not copytight around it so could totally just sell the same image as an nft twice if you engage in the sacred right clicking.
If it's big enough like Cryptopunks people can just search for all of the existing ones by essentially what's their "ID". It'd be really hard to sell a fake of an existing, and especially expensive nft. Don't get me wrong nft art is dumb as fuck but it works.
fun fact: the "blockchain" the people are talking about is actually fake and a scam. it would make sense if there was a watermark, but no, it just floats there out in the open, people can and will take it for free. commission artists instead. they will draw you a fullbody, shaded and very detailed background for the bare minimum of 30$. sure, sounds expensive, but WAY cheaper than a goddamn NFT for 150k$. Hell, some artists do shaded fullbodies for 10$ or less!
NFTs give me those gaming ad vibes where they say stuff like "gaming in 2022 isn't good unless your getting something back" (which i am getting something back called entertainment)
One of my favourite things to do involving NFT bros is to assume they all have ben shapiro voice. "ExcuseMe, Liberal, ButItAppearsYouHaveScreenshottedMyNFT, ThisIsNotFunny, NorAJoke, Liberal, YouWillBeInContactWithMyLawyer, Immediately, Liberal."
Heck furries have more talent on colors and some anatomy than these expensive pixels of monkies and scribbles. Also good for you for adding furries on the lower level of cringe, seems more accurate.
To be honest, I had it out for furries but then I saw how absolutely awful everyone else is and they nestled down a few tiers. Comfortable in around 10th place for the weirdest and cringe fandom
@@LaloSalamancaGaming69 found the nft bro. Dude at least the suit can be insured against thefts, all I gotta do is save image as for your crappy flash art.
The fact that I can pay my college tuition and my property taxes for after school with a fucking picture of a few pixels leaves me both scared for the future and disappointed in my species.
You know what the most funny part about this was? That right as I clicked the video I got an AD promoting to get NFTs. I legit sat there for a solid minute before I realised it was an ad and you weren’t going to cut in and make a joke taking the piss out of it.
"You think it's funny to take screen shots of NFTs? Property theft is a joke to you?" and add in "millions of families suffer every year because of stolen NFTs Jim" and you'd got yourself Dwight from the Office
NFT are basically reverse commission, where in commission you tell an artist to draw your idea and then pay after it's done whole NFT in the other hand is the exact opposite where you buy an idea/picture AFTER it's done so it's basically a convenient store vs a fast food, on fast food (idk, McDonald's or something) you order Big Mac, the worker make it you then you pay after you get the stuff while in convenient store you either pick the stuff on the shelf or leave it
Actually, no. Those are adoptables, where an artist draws a character or idea and sells it one time to another owner after it's finished, and typically the adoptable is not resold but sometimes is. You find NFTs in toxic waste trash behind factories, then try to pass it off as not trash to attempt to sell it.
Ur not buying the image ur buying the proof u bought it. Like a shitty digital trading card. Commissioned art you own, you cannot use nft except for fair use policy
The whole furry art thing is kinda funny. Like nobody will care if you screenshot it. Just gotta credit the og artist. But the funny thing is there’s already been a way to buy art (art that actually good) for pfps in place. I mean I get that Nfts are an investment. But if you just want a pfp. Just. Find something. Or commission an artist who’s work you like. And it actually supports artists who ACTUALLY TRY TO MAKE GOOD SHIT. Like damnn this shit UGLY
Any time I see an NFT, no matter what it looks like, I just look at the _real_ art on my walls and think "why?" It's not expensive art, it's not made by some huge name, but it's nice. It's pretty to look at, and it brings me peace. WHAT THE FLYING F**K IS THAT SHIT AT 3:20?!?! PEOPLE ARE BUYING THIS?! Who would _EVER_ want to hang _THAT_ on their wall? OH RIGHT! THEY CAN'T! IT'S NOT EVEN REAL!
Love how you can get a artist and commission them to make draw or make you want for the right price artists seem to do it for like €50 maybe more or less depending on what you got then the NFT bros are spending thousands on shit randomly generated images that needed a base and a few hats then that’s it
the fact that people can just grab art that took time and effort from others,without permission,and turn it into a nft,and get money for it....its just discusting
I said this once, and I’ll say it again. Imagine this, you’re an artist on the internet taking commissions, You charge 50 USD for every piece of art you make, (which is how much art should be selling for at minimum by the way,) you build up a solid reputation and you make all kinds of work, from people’s thumbnails to people’s profile pictures, basically everything, you make a decent amount off of this and you’re really proud of what you make, sure, it could very well be better but hey, it’s enough. And then some idiot sells some shoddy and rushed drawing of a cow or something they made when they were three as an NFT and makes 1 million or some bullcrap number for something which took five seconds to make. This is why NFTs are bullcrap.
For the price of some of these NFTs, people could have personal animations commissioned in their likeness, but they buy a worthless picture of a poorly constructed ape instead. The Brian rot is contagious
Wacky nft fact: the images they "own" arent saved on the blockchain or anything like that, in fact the images arent decentralized at all (which kinda ruins the whole point). The images are stored on regular cloud storages like google drive and the thing you "own" on the blockchain is really just the image hash. Its like going to a car auction, paying the price of a lamborghini to then get a completely unique receipt that says you have purchased a lamborghini while the car still stands where you have seen it.
2:22 The person who posted the NFT does not own the art. They own a link to the art (usually on google drive), no copyrights were given to him when buying it. Stealing a profile picture is worse than stealing an NFT because the profile picture is actually made by someone with love, instead of for money, and with a randomly generating application. Plus profile pictures are way way cheaper than NFTs usually go for
The person doesn't even own the link, whoever owns the server owns the link. If the server owner decides to delete the "art" or point that link to something else then there's nothing the person that paid for the link can do about it legally because they don't own it. The person selling the NFT doesn't have the right to sell server storage space or address links.
NTF logic is basically... If I tried to sell my own actual shit for millions of dollars because it's one of a kind and you can't get it from anywhere else :/
NEW GOOBY JUICY DISCORD UP AND FULLY OPERATIONAL JOIN NOW NOW!!:
discord.gg/qbafp7TTeA
how juicy is it
7 likes on pinned comment and over 8k likes on top comment
btw right clicking does nothing to the value of the NFT. stay up though
I think this NFT bussiness is very shady or as you said in your video it is extremly smelly.
I am thinking its for laundering money used in bloody paramilitary operations. I dont know.
These NFT guys need to be investigated by the IRS or something lol.
"even if you screenshot the NFT, I still own it."
okay so why do they care if I screenshot an NFT?
the price goes down but they dont care nor do I.
This comment goes hard feel free to screenshot
This reply to the above comments go hard feel entitled to screenshot!!!
Because you have an exact copy of their image, with no differences or indications that you didn't buy the link to the image, they don't even own the image, just a Blockchain related to it.
one person cried “THIEF!” to a bunch a people right-clicking and screenshotting, dunno why they’re upset, it should’ve made the value go up right?
unless the market has nothing that works that way and it dilutes the price but they can’t say that cause more people will do it if they say that.
I love how NFT buyers are actually trying to convince themselves they didnt actually spent 10k in an URL
an url is more valuable than a frickin nft
@Scrangle Mcjangle wdym? the grammar is perfectly fine
@@Concon12316 in an*
@@keithflippers4429 ok fine but that doesn't make it not legible english, like scrangle was saying
@@keithflippers4429 go outside and get some bitches
NFT = No Females Tonight.
Are you implying they once had a female in their vicinity? Cuz i doubet it
no females. ever.
Maybe tommorrow not tonight doe
Or any other night 😂
No Female Touch
The way NFTs are drawn reminds me of those flash dress up games
I’d rather spend money to buy one of those Flash games than a NFT.
They look like bootleg club penguin characters.
It’s all the same shit with a different skin
@@cosmicspacething3474 lol yes
@@DARTHNECRION at least you can actually do something with a flash game. and some of them are actually cool
NFT actually stands for
N-never
F-felt
T- the touch of a woman
underated comment
Absolutely incredible
And it should stay that way.
Hopefully it stays that way
The only way nft owners will be touched is by a taser.
I can see why furries would be infuriated that they're stealing their art. I mean, at least they put actual artistic talent and effort into their art pieces and actually charge smaller prices when doing adopts and commissions.
NFT *"artists"* just click on a randomizer and pick which one is the stupidest.
I would love to infuriate a furry
Fr
Yea, like it or not, some furry oc’s take a lot of *actual human thought* to think of and create. I would be mad too if some stupid “artist” stole it too
@@re-blitz sounds like something a furry would say
@@frankhorriganfromfallout2 bruh who cares lmao their art is still getting stolen
Nft people: “I own it. It’s my property even if you screenshot it.” Also nft people: “don’t screenshot nfts please”
don't care screenshot go brrrrr
@@user-rd2on3yg7w Your pic goes hard, May I screenshot 🥺
@@blank888 yes ma'am / sir / they / him / her / Mr / Mrs / Ms / Joe
I own land and the government has a piece of paper that says I can shoot someone for trespassing on it under the right circumstances. I still have to pay taxes but crypto has allowed me to keep that to a minimum lol.
@@blank888 Of course
If they don’t want random people to screenshot the NFT, there is something called “Commisions", where they pay and then give them the art without the hassle of screenshots.
dont give them ideas lol
...and then it turns out the "NFT" was actually just a picture of a dump the Artist took yesterday.
@@DerVolman or just a single pixel
@@thecorrurtion215 or a DeviantArt base that they just drew over hastily hundreds of times
@@missingtexturez or something drawn by a 4 year old that sucks at drawing
i love how NFT owners comparing their art to mona lisa
do they forgot everyone in 1503 dont have "Save as" feature?
You know the whole NFT selling business is going well when the NFT bro invites someone to drink with them and he won't even pay for the fucking drinks.
They cant, even if they're rich in crypto, itd take years to sell it all off. But most likely they are broke asf cuz NFT is a "get rich quick"-type scam
Crab game ost was used in the intro
Thats what I said lol " You pay...because I'll be broke up until you by my shit."
@@iDontProgramInCpp trade offer
I - gets 1million dollars.
You - gets a image you're less likely going to find someone to buy for the Same price.
@@joaopedrofm1299 trade offer refused.
I love how the whole point of the NFT system is to verify who "owns" that image, and yet they still get angry for no reason when people right click it. It's absolutely hilarious.
Yes, are dummies, i don't care if you screenshot my NFT, no problem, because it's not your digital private property until you have it, but yeah, it's funny right click and save image 🤣
They obviously never heard of Google images.
@Hakim Habib alright Ahab no one cares
I mean, the whole point of the blockchain is to prove that "yes, I paid for this, I have this image in my wallet". The NFTs are just shitty image representations of a crypto coin. Therefore, there is absolutely no reason to be upset that people saved your duplicate of the image. People who get upset about right-clicking are complaining about a problem that doesn't exist because they're scared that the big ego money they wasted won't be worth it anymore.
NFT investors are stupid
Possession =/= ownership
Cringe nft owner: "you think property theft is a joke huh!?"
Me: "yes."
Comissions are what NFTs wish they were
A comission is when you pay an artist to bring your idea into the world, they get money, you get your imagination as a piece of art
NFTs on the other hand
You buy some weird animal doing weird shit for 200 grand and then get scammed
Actually you aren't even buying the image, you're essentially buying a fucking link to an image stored on Google Drive using crypto.
@@ghostassassin1107 even worse
true. U based AF, my guy (guy in a gender neutral context)
it's called money laundering
@@MsZsc monkey laundering
The thing with the furry art is that the "stolen" art was resold. Nobody claims to screenshot an nft to sell it, but screenshotting furry art with the intent to practically resell it is different.
There is actual copy right behind d furry art in some places lmao
@@comradesillyotter1537 especially when the artist watermarks their art.
@@Coffeekitty7 or they sketch it traditionaly and then transfer to digital form
Dude did a literal art theft, those furry pfp were mostly done by the person or bought from an artist and they, you know, own the piece and rights to it.
Unlike NFTs
@@cumscum As someone who owns furry art, stealing it and selling it as an NFT is noT much better than a guy stealing a Amazon package and flipping it on eBay.
@@cbj4sc1 yup exactly, its art theft, profiting off of someones hard work without contributing anything
"We like the art" is the biggest cope I've ever heard in my entire life.
Ok so let me get this straight.
Nfts is basically just there to give you a piece of code for you to own. Not the image itself, but a code generated to associate for that image. So legally speaking someone that owns the nft has no leagal basis to sue people that screenshot their nft.
Bruh this is stupid just get a commission.
They won't commission bc they don't care about the art, only the money they can get from this "get rich quick" scheme
When they tell you it about the art, they full of shit. See how they cry when people tell how their 100k art are worthless now.
@@fishbrain9591 yesss.
Here to promote that you should support your favourite artist by commissioning them.. It could be as LOW as 5$...depending on the art. How cool is that!? And cheap. On the higher... More expensive side.. It could reach up to 200-300$..maybe more depending on the artist. But hey.. Thats waaaaay cheaper than tasteless images.
Not to mention... Its FULLY your ownnnn customization!!!
@Potato You know, since writing this comment, I've kind of changed my tune. All the things I've mentioned are still true but it's become very clear that NFTs are not being created as a new means of funding artists, or solving any actual problems. In their current form, they really are just a bigger fool scam. They didn't have to be, but they are. I still think people should be educated on what NFTs actually are versus what the discourse paints them as. But that doesn't mean what they actually are has any value at all.
3:53 the fact that this dude genuinely tried to pick up women and saying "you pay" made me laugh harder then it should've
LMAO
Okay, so im gonna make women pay me for dinner and try to scam them and also probably making her my girlfriendt this plan cant fail
Oh shet only dudes are coming i guess i am going to specifiy
@@peggyazuga5544 Same guy be wondering why women stay far away from him
Lmaooooooooooooooo
lol? women don't buy you drinks when you go out? work on your life
3:20 "How dare you steal my property rights!" While completely ignoring how a lot of NFTs are outright stolen art. You can't write this stuff.
Its funny how mad some of the nft people get over people just right clicking and saving their images also your videos are pretty funny
Probably because they are mad that people get the same thing that they have, without paying 1 million dollars
Theyre literally mad for no reason
Ar thus point the right click and save is getting more annoying then normal nftbros so maybe don't give nfts attention??
Why can't they just put watermarks?
They don't get angry when someone is right clicking and copying their nfts, it's just a stupid joke created by NFT haters
You guys ever heard about about the giant stone coin? It was a big cylindrical thing with a hole in the middle, back in a time where the size of a coin was equal to its value. Problem was that, one day, this giant coin was transported on a boat that ended up sinking. So obviously the coin gets lost to the depth of the sea, yeah? But the thing is...people still traded that coin. They couldn't physically _have_ the coin, of course, what with it being at the bottom of the ocean. Nor, most likely, could they confirm that the coin still existed or, in fact, had ever existed to begin with after a long time had passed. Yet people still traded ownership of it. All the buyer had to do was believe they were to become the owner of a _very big coin_ that was at the bottom of the ocean, _seriously dude it's there and it's VERY big dude trust me,_ and it was worth lots and thus was worth owning. Of course, without the coin physically present, the only thing proving ownership of said coin was some flimsy paperwork and word-of-mouth-- paperwork which could be forged or falsified and word-of-mouth that could turn sour and easily devalue the coin through disbelief of its value and existence. And thus, the big stone coin at the bottom of the ocean became valueless.
This is the story I think about whenever someone brings up NFTs.
Wait... is that the inspiration behind Mr. Krabs' first dime?????
th-cam.com/video/nKu72D-H6Bs/w-d-xo.html
@@liamwhite3522 Holy cow I forgot abt that episode! Considering the the creators of of Spongebob were marine biologists who loved to include allusions to real life events and marine facts, I don't doubt that at all!
Edit: looking it up I found even more info on the story of the stone coin! It originated from the island of Yap, where many coins were too large to even be moved! Because of this, the economic system has been compared to Bitcoin because the coins themselves often could not be physically given to their owners. It was only by word of mouth within the small island communities that gave the stone money any buying power and confirmed its current owner. This system would obviously break down on a larger scale as the honor system would be more likely to fall apart as misinformation would be brought in by poorly intentioned individuals, causing the coins to lose value and their ownership to become muddied.
And it was, in fact, the inspiration for Mr Krabs' dime!
@@conspiracypanda1200 Dang, I knew Krabs would get his claws into crypto. I never imagined he already had!
That is a sad truth of how humanity is still that gullible under their own terms of what they find value in, the island people are okay because I respect the fact they were into stones. But this time, this is just pure stupidity.
But unlike NFTs there *is* a slight possibility this coin does exist, giving it more physical value by default
As an artist who does art commissions, there was a time when a client (my classmate) told me that I should do NFTs for the money. The fact that he said it confidently when I was doing HIS homework for him as a commission really amused me. Some people really are stupid down to the bone.
Furries(some): creates a highly detailed art for 20$
NFT: Creates a monkey with trash all over it "200,000$ take it or leave it"
True
Even i didnt want to say it, but you right
Yeah this also applies to any kind of serious artist who does commissions for a living. Kinda sucks but that's how the world works now I guess.
there is some real good art for real cheap money from real artists
@@cloaker7139 Yeah, like nullghost arts u pay 15$ dollars and access to very highly detailed art in his patreon 💀
This legit makes me want to create an image, sell it as an NFT for a stupidly high price (probably like 100k, 150k), and then as soon as someone buys it and it's all settled, publicly shame the idiot for buying a low effort image for such a high amount then dip out for a while and enjoy my money. Is it a scam? Yeah, it is. But isn't this whole NFT bullshit the biggest scam in recent times?
Dew it
How is this a scam? In this context the costumer is recieving the product while being fully aware of what the product's all about. Also, no1 will buy an nft for that high from a regular person/artist, NFTs are seen as one of the best ways to launder money right now, they are laundering money while profiting off people that jumped in from the hype. The rich get richer while the poor get a png, all of this while damaging the planet.
it really is, so much people are very tasteless on art these days.
do it! it'll be even better if you know how to actually draw.
@@re57k then he is just making a common NFT
Reminds me, I saw an NFT on sale for about $12k. It was basically punk style pixel art. For 12 thousand dollars.
A simple right click and save image got it for free. How interesting.
The dumb thing about NFTs is you really dont own the image, you only own the blockchain associated WITH the image, which just means you can sell that blockchain to someone else but thats about all an NFT gives you, which is ridiculous for something so expensive and useless. In the United States, its literally a fraction of the price to actually copyright an image/artwork which would actually give real legal ownership.
It's like buying handwritten directions to the Statue of Liberty and thinking you own the structure.
@@alouiciouswrex7141 This is the best explanation of how the act I've ever heard
@@alouiciouswrex7141 Not the instructions itself, more like a pic of the instructions.
Bruh what capitalist hellscape have we created that people care more about paying for a receipt more than the actual art 😭😭
@@polocatfan If you find any sense in it, the door is right there.
at least furries have good taste in anthropomorphic animal art and dont waste 10k on an ugly monkey
i feel like humanity is getting worse if being a furry is thought of "decent" nowadays
@@Chinchillys waka baka
yes
@@Chinchillys and? Humanity passed rock bottom a long while ago, if youre dont want it... dont accept it I guess. Itll always get worse
@@Chinchillys tbh furries are just weebs but like anthro shit, both get disgusting insults, both like cartoons, and both make extremely well crafted art, and both have weird kinks
This is all still better than NFTs, atleast when a furry buys one of those ugly fursuits its physical and can even be unique, i dont like furries but lets be real, they arent too far apart from weebs
as a furry, the only good thing that came out of nfts is that there is now something the internet hates more than us
TRUE 😭😭
if the art itself is at least good and not overpriced, i dont think people will hate it that much
then again there is the environment problem
@@mrluthfians01 Nfts are just wrong every way you look at it
PD: That's why they really need to go soon
To be honest that bumblebee one wasnt that bad, still overpriced
Just commission lol
@@daridon2483 this use is terrible, but the technology and idea isn't. Let's try not to throw out the baby with the bath water.
I wholeheartedly accept that furries like me are cringe, but at least we aren’t, you know, NFT cringe.
the way i see it, alot of “cringe” communities are cringe cuz a small 5% group of that community produces 95% of cringe. with nft bros… 99% of the community produces 100% of the cringe
Yes you are
You are a good one
At least your art is good
@@tagtart1 no, no. he's got a point.
fun fact: when picasso was shown the very first "Lazy Lion" NFT, he reportedly left the room and went to re-evaluate his carrer choices
Picasso later returned to make his own NFTs called, distorted Humans
@@Predator20357 They actually had value since they weren't manufactured like bog roll.
@@Bacony_Cakes Such is the curse of having so much care in your work
@@Trunksdelfuturogaming xD that's true
@@Trunksdelfuturogaming shittier*
"Sells"
This shit straight money laundering. Remember that whole thing around vintage copies of Mario on the NES going for like $100k, but the founders of that "grading" company were just buying each other's shit to inflate prices artificially and create hype? That's what's happening here with the really big sales. NFT's are just a scam, that's it. Zero value.
Yeah it sure feels like that. Most probably it's the same guy buying his own nft and inflating it's value and hoping to sell it for a profit.
That's right, nobody wants NFT's, they only try to make quick money selling it over and over again
It's like Bitcoin but at least these kryptos are money or something like that
Yeah, you can buy drugs with cryptos.
@@Khrayfish THEN SELL THOSE DRUGS, MAKING DRUG MONEY, TO THEN MONEY LAUNDER INTO NFTS TO MAKE USEABLE MONEY
Crypto's really bad for illegal stuff, though. Blockchains lay out a trail leading right to you. All the authorities would have to do is look.
That's why illegal shit is done with cash. Anyone who knows what they're doing doesn't want a computer anywhere near it.
I feel bad for the furries kinda, imagine making art and then getting it stolen...
The difference between us screenshotting nft's and them stealing furry art is that furry art was made by a person, it took them effort to create... While NFT's are just obtained by paying (Or screenshotting)
i think the avarage furry artist can draw you better art for $10 dollars than the 10k nfts... the art is very cheap and usually of extremely good quality, trust me id know
Some are even on levels of Renaissance paintings on how detailed they are for Jesus Christ... Rich mainstream people are really the worst waste of oxygen in this planet
@@JustSomeoneWhoLikesBears don't forget incompetent politicians (basically 90% of them)
I can agree with this, the most expensive it normally gets is around $60 and the art around there are just marvelous.
@@Precision_FC the first time I ever agreed with a furry on something lmao
The guy who made my profile picture made me pay only $45, and I’d rather have this than literally any NFT.
Even better, I could make my own pfp (which I did for discord and Twitter), and if I had the time you bet your ass I’d offer to do commissions.
At least with (most) furries, the art and characters are hand drawn, colored and designed with unique features. The NFT characters are literally the same base with different expressions and clothes.
The furry community is surprisingly good about properly paying artists and such too.
@@Cerebrosum lowkey, if the furry community suddenly disappeared, so much of the internet and some real life tech infrastructure would just collapse
This reminds me of rare pepes.
@@justyouraveragememester5037 That is not a comforting thought
@@keiromultiverse3608 It IS just rare Pepe's, except unironcally, which should've been impossible, but here we are
It's beautiful to see every communities that usually fight each others join forces in their shared hatred of NFTs. Nothing unites enemies more than a common one.
Furries: I never thought I'd fight side by side with a gamer.
Gamers: what about with a friend?
Furries: Aye, I could do that.
The names should be swapped. Other than that, yeah…
at least the furry art is actually good
@@jensl5956 👁️👁️
@@jensl5956 mmmmmmmmmmmm...
Bro yall judgin but judy hopps thiccin frfr
I would never commission or wear furry art myself, but i think there is something of a difference between saving an NFT to use as a profile picture as a joke and taking art that people paid for/actually put effort into and pasting it into Photoshop and reselling it.
There's really a difference in just screenshoting any digital art and saving it to your computer, maybe using it as a desktop background or something, and screenshoting it and reselling it or claiming it as your own, using it as your pfp on a professional account, etc.
Most furry artists or furries don't care if you save their art, or do anything with it as long as you acknowledge who the owner/artist is and don't try to claim its yours.
@@QueenGlory13 and/or attempt to sell said artwork to make random merchandise (or in this case, resell as an NFT). [Without permission]
I'm an artist and if I saw that happen to my art, boy oh boy DMCA files are going someone's way 👊🏽🧍♂️
NFT bros are the people who say "LUL UR MAD" when you make a good argument
I gotta love how nft artists are mad at their art being stolen so they just steal more art
Truee
It's a very un-Civilization V Cape Town Jingle process.
FURRIES are gross
makes you wonder what all the people who said "nft's arent bad for digital artists" were smoking.
@@grooviestglobe4907 how exactly
I love how he felt the need to specify “celebrities and/or models” as if he was so far above the common man
“It’s my NFT you can’t screen shot it, plus it’s mine, you’re mad you don’t have it”
Proceeds to mald about said screenshot
In the word of Jontron: “Well if it’s this easy to become an entrepreneur, I tell you what, I’ll be one myself!”
Time to take a picture of my mailbox, pixelize it, and sell it for 7 thousand dollars
Nobody is gonna unironically buy an image from the internet when you could just screenshot it or move the image to the search tab and then download it.
Or commission an actual artist you like to make something custom for you, for a fraction of the price.
yes but this is twitter we're talking about, they have and will unironically buy a cubic centimeter of dirt if they think its so special
@@fureversalty They must have an upsetting life then.
@@Timeward76 like, even without commissioning, if you want to financially support an artist, you can just... donate in some way.
@@fureversalty i mean i'd buy a cubic centimeter of dirt but for no reason other than because it's dirt
I feel like the only reason that NFT’s are targeting furries is because their art is better and well priced but they “copied them” even though technically their copying furries
@@Damascene_ right I would run for Reddit mod but
1) I’m a girl
2) I’m autistic and my brain can get weird at times
3) I’m not fat
4) I’ve got a GF (not anime)
@@Damascene_ yaaaay we’re both gonna be subjected to ableisim
@@Damascene_ literally had to change primary schools in year 3 or 4 cause of an ableist headteacher even though I was adored by everyone else
I personally think our way of trying to reason to these "NFT bros" as if they were genuinely collecting the art is wrong.
These guys don't "collect art" and definitely are not "supporting artists", that is because they aren't there for the "art", they're there for the "value" they made up for these thingies
They just want to be rich, it's just a scheme of very greedy people fabricating "scarcity thus its valuable" to things that shouldn't just so they can become "billionares".
So they'll never be in for the art, they're just greedy, the guy who buys the NFT doesn't think about "owning", they just want to sell it for a higher price
Bruh what capitalist hellscape have we created that people care more about paying for a receipt more than the actual art 😭😭
Ooh, so like beanie babies?
@@Tanaka1168 Welcome to the 2020's, a sad and depressing parody of the glorious human race, where we all go crazy and eat each other up until everything's hit rock bottom. If this continues, and mark my words when I say this, the coming rest of the century is only gonna get worse and worse. A civilization lost to corporate greed.
@@asaxena9921 things werent exactly good for the past 2 millenia, either. This stuff is tame in comparison
@@Ben-mw9vz Things weren't good, but throughout human history millions of people have worked hard and even gave their life to make the society a better place, a place that they could live happily in, not a utopia of course but not something far from it. Today we are living in one of the most comfortable time period of human history ever and this is what we are living in, a soon to be corporate dystopia ruled by monopolies with celebrity billionaires. It's a shame what we have become, what we are becoming, and what our impact on the planet itself if. If our ancestors, on whose shoulders we stand, saw all of this, I'm pretty sure a good amount of them would be very disappointed.
2:23 the funny thing is that someone actually tried this but then got a DMCA takedown for trying to make NFTs out of other people’s art
Hopefully the reality of how worthless NFTs are catches up to these guys
I cant remember where i read this analogy. But... its not my original thought. " buying a nft is like going to the grocery store, buying groceries, but leaving them at the store and walking away only with a receipt" you bought a receipt.
they'll buy NFTs, we'll laugh at them as the fad dies, and then someone will figure out how to do something actually cool and useful with the technology behind them instead of "I sold another monkey"
Actually the guy who invented nfts in 1 day like 5 years ago left they as they are basically dead tech
Also people said that bitcoin was fad, the monkey's NFTs are shit, don't have creativity, only a famous creator, there are many NFTs beautiful and others categories, trading cards, sports, art, music...
Because it is trading card game
The same thing why black lotus and some Yu-Gi-Oh cards are extremely expensive.
@@r3zaful but they don’t do anything and aren’t real. It’s like trying to play Pokémon if you could just create an infinite number of cards.
@@hueyg206 that would be fan emulator game then? 🤔 You can play expensive cards like ten thousand dragon in yugioh right now with ygopro, for free.
Is that ten thousand dragon you play in ygopro play exactly like the actual card? Yes
And i don't think people are brave enough to play 3k$ card in real duel, it is likely to stay in the binder for the rest of its life.
It's always fun when furries and normies can band together against something so stupid like NFTs
The enemy of my enemy is lower on my hit list
2:24
"I screenshot an image with no watermark that's copy/pasted from a base model that you simply customized."
"Okay, then I'm free to commit literal art theft on your actual hard work."
Fixed that meme comic for the NFT bros, no need to thank me guys. ✌️
Guys please just commission a artist.
It’s worth 70-80 dollars for high quality art, you can mostly choose what you want, and it helps the artist get money. A lot better then this stinky NFT stuff
A furry is an artist's friend when it comes to commissions, both can have a win-win situation, one pays good and one creates what the other one paid for.
Furries have no friends
Thats so true.
Imagine getting 100k for your college from your family and you just used the money for an nft on a the internet. Thats so sad litteraly, you will get disowned
Especially if its from a bored ape with a hat.
NFT won't last long. It's just another sudden hype and its values nothing. In my country, we have almost similar case in 2016-2018 where people collecting gem stones and expect the values will skyrocket. In reality, those gem stones are just for show. Sure, in early hype there's some gemstones that worth up to $ 10k, but that won't last long.
It reminds me a bit of the tulip mania, and we all know where that went. If you don't, it went the way that NFTs most likely will: A bubble that bursts.
Yeah, Don't expect real ugly pictures that are inflated beyond imagination to last long. And I can steal the picture by saving it. Easiest steal ever
...Batu Akik?
@@third-ratedude4234 correct
They remind me of POGs, Beanie Babies, and Furbies back in the 90s. At least those had some real scarcity, despite being useless tchotchkes and knicknacks.
The bumblebee art that guy bought? They could’ve got it as a poster, or bought the rights to it to legally own the copyright to it so if anyone else uses it you can ask them to take it down, you could commission an artist to get a cool bit of art or just support the artist who made it with a modest patreon donation or something
But no, that shit costs more than a car..
Tbh it's just the same as a csgo skin, except you don't actually even own it since anyone can just screenshot it and repost it as of now, so it's like a having a rare csgo skin that someone borrows, duplicates and just spam all over, basically worthless. But hey if i take shit in my hand and sell it on ebay for 5000$ if someone actually wants it that bad to buy it then it's worth that.
The thing the celebrities nft guys don't seem to realize is the only reason their NFTS are so expensive is because they paid a shit ton for it, and that doesn't mean anyone else after them would like to buy it for that price again from then.
@@beepboopbeepp and that you can’t even use in a game or have any sense of completion or joy or fun of having it cause let’s face it, it’s literally just bought to be sold for more money, which is very sad.. more sad than paying irl money for a CSGO skin
@Hakim Habib you’d be incredibly lucky if it gets into any database that matters
Real furry art is actually pretty impressive, especially compared to nft's. Yep, for once Im siding with the furries
Before you know it, people will take photos of their poop and call it an nft
Sounds like a dream
Non-flushable turds
That could happen
art
I quite literally had the same idea except as a joke
Man it's even funnier that they can't even choose what they want in the image. With the drawing skill of an elementary school student you can just find the base, add anything you want, any expression you want, for free, and you actually own the image itself.
Some guy thinks he's so important not only does he want a model but he wants the model to pay FOR HIS MEAL
i don't get why people don't just turn already existing "rare" nfts into their own nft like there's not copytight around it so could totally just sell the same image as an nft twice if you engage in the sacred right clicking.
If it's big enough like Cryptopunks people can just search for all of the existing ones by essentially what's their "ID". It'd be really hard to sell a fake of an existing, and especially expensive nft.
Don't get me wrong nft art is dumb as fuck but it works.
fun fact: the "blockchain" the people are talking about is actually fake and a scam. it would make sense if there was a watermark, but no, it just floats there out in the open, people can and will take it for free.
commission artists instead. they will draw you a fullbody, shaded and very detailed background for the bare minimum of 30$. sure, sounds expensive, but WAY cheaper than a goddamn NFT for 150k$. Hell, some artists do shaded fullbodies for 10$ or less!
At this point I'm going to promote myself in the comments /j
NFTs give me those gaming ad vibes where they say stuff like "gaming in 2022 isn't good unless your getting something back" (which i am getting something back called entertainment)
The guy who was stealing furry art has now gotten a shit ton of DMCA claims and might be getting sued I believe.
What the hell
Good. I don’t care if their cringe as hell, you can’t profit off someone’s art.
lmfao
That's karma right there
LET'S FUCKING GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
I once saw a comment of a person that compared NFT’s with comissions and reading his argument made me feel smart.
One of my favourite things to do involving NFT bros is to assume they all have ben shapiro voice.
"ExcuseMe, Liberal, ButItAppearsYouHaveScreenshottedMyNFT, ThisIsNotFunny, NorAJoke, Liberal, YouWillBeInContactWithMyLawyer, Immediately, Liberal."
Ok, If furries attack NFTs, I'm for the furries.
Heck furries have more talent on colors and some anatomy than these expensive pixels of monkies and scribbles.
Also good for you for adding furries on the lower level of cringe, seems more accurate.
To be honest, I had it out for furries but then I saw how absolutely awful everyone else is and they nestled down a few tiers. Comfortable in around 10th place for the weirdest and cringe fandom
@@yeetmeat5010 the furries I've met were damn weird but at least they aren't toxic
@@candle_eatist
It the Internet, everyone act weird on the Internet.
@@yeetmeat5010 People still caring about fandoms? Damn, they really needed grow up
They're weird irl and freaking toxic on internet, and also weird, and I've met just a few.
Def top 5.
Love that nft bros get mad when you right click there art but right clicking someone elses for an nft is fair game
As a sports fan, I am in physical pain looking at the “game day dads” NFTs
If I had to choose between a 100k fur suit, or an 10k NFT. I’m going with the fur suit
If you get the fur suit you can sell it and regain all your money, profit!
@@bagel.5259 And you can actually use it
@@_lod and be actually unique
If you are going with a pedo zoophilic suit you’re sick
@@LaloSalamancaGaming69 found the nft bro. Dude at least the suit can be insured against thefts, all I gotta do is save image as for your crappy flash art.
The fact that I can pay my college tuition and my property taxes for after school with a fucking picture of a few pixels leaves me both scared for the future and disappointed in my species.
One thing I never understand is that out of all the sites that nft collectors had to gather on, why must it be twitter?
its where everybody insane gathers
Twitter is for shitters
Because it's TWITTER
Twitter is the place where the worst of every group of humanity gathers for an endless conflict
@@w.t.5136 A true man of culture, I see.
A Painting by an art master sells because it’s a physical object that cannot be perfectly duplicated in seconds
You know what the most funny part about this was? That right as I clicked the video I got an AD promoting to get NFTs. I legit sat there for a solid minute before I realised it was an ad and you weren’t going to cut in and make a joke taking the piss out of it.
"You think it's funny to take screen shots of NFTs? Property theft is a joke to you?" and add in "millions of families suffer every year because of stolen NFTs Jim" and you'd got yourself Dwight from the Office
NFT are basically reverse commission, where in commission you tell an artist to draw your idea and then pay after it's done whole NFT in the other hand is the exact opposite where you buy an idea/picture AFTER it's done so it's basically a convenient store vs a fast food, on fast food (idk, McDonald's or something) you order Big Mac, the worker make it you then you pay after you get the stuff while in convenient store you either pick the stuff on the shelf or leave it
Yet somehow the convenience store food is grossly more expensive.
Actually, no. Those are adoptables, where an artist draws a character or idea and sells it one time to another owner after it's finished, and typically the adoptable is not resold but sometimes is.
You find NFTs in toxic waste trash behind factories, then try to pass it off as not trash to attempt to sell it.
Ur not buying the image ur buying the proof u bought it. Like a shitty digital trading card. Commissioned art you own, you cannot use nft except for fair use policy
I have no words that can describe the amount of pain nfts and the people behind them bring me.
The fact people think art commissions and NFTs are the same pains my brain
2:29 I am super glad that they took this screenshot before the dislike button was removed
1:12 this thing give me the same vibes for when you press the random botton in a picrew why some reason
The whole furry art thing is kinda funny. Like nobody will care if you screenshot it. Just gotta credit the og artist. But the funny thing is there’s already been a way to buy art (art that actually good) for pfps in place. I mean I get that Nfts are an investment. But if you just want a pfp. Just. Find something. Or commission an artist who’s work you like. And it actually supports artists who ACTUALLY TRY TO MAKE GOOD SHIT. Like damnn this shit UGLY
I made my pfp on a shitty phone app. It was free.
@@pancake4061 That's not the point at hand, if people really wanted "uniqueness" they would actually commission an artist and not a corporation
like literally go on wikipedia and download a picture of some random space object
Any time I see an NFT, no matter what it looks like, I just look at the _real_ art on my walls and think "why?"
It's not expensive art, it's not made by some huge name, but it's nice. It's pretty to look at, and it brings me peace.
WHAT THE FLYING F**K IS THAT SHIT AT 3:20?!?! PEOPLE ARE BUYING THIS?! Who would _EVER_ want to hang _THAT_ on their wall?
OH RIGHT! THEY CAN'T! IT'S NOT EVEN REAL!
I think that's the final result of the Russian Sleep Experiment.
What do you mean by real art??? Just kinda confused here.
I feel like this is what would be classified as a memetic hazard
NFT flip traditional art huh
that's the cringest statement I've ever heard of
Train: "still skeptical"
Also Train: *spends $275k on weed monke*
BONUS BONUS BONUS BABY
Love how you can get a artist and commission them to make draw or make you want for the right price artists seem to do it for like €50 maybe more or less depending on what you got then the NFT bros are spending thousands on shit randomly generated images that needed a base and a few hats then that’s it
At least with furries, most of those $1000+ fursuits look half way decent and creative instead of just copying and pasting the same format.
Fursuits are also tangible
and the vast majority of fursuits have tons of effort put into them, unlike nfts
@@shearlix fire
as a furry i havent joined the war against NFTS, but now i am, now im gonna create a furry pfp out of NFTs
I'm here with the moral support.
@@Bacony_Cakes thank you
@@treesimp6686 we'll beat out the jerries before next christmas
@@Bacony_Cakes Y E S
@@treesimp6686 kill the false bourgeoisie
the fact that people can just grab art that took time and effort from others,without permission,and turn it into a nft,and get money for it....its just discusting
love coming back here after knowing nfts have crashed :3c
I said this once, and I’ll say it again.
Imagine this, you’re an artist on the internet taking commissions, You charge 50 USD for every piece of art you make, (which is how much art should be selling for at minimum by the way,) you build up a solid reputation and you make all kinds of work, from people’s thumbnails to people’s profile pictures, basically everything, you make a decent amount off of this and you’re really proud of what you make, sure, it could very well be better but hey, it’s enough.
And then some idiot sells some shoddy and rushed drawing of a cow or something they made when they were three as an NFT and makes 1 million or some bullcrap number for something which took five seconds to make.
This is why NFTs are bullcrap.
For the price of some of these NFTs, people could have personal animations commissioned in their likeness, but they buy a worthless picture of a poorly constructed ape instead. The Brian rot is contagious
Wacky nft fact: the images they "own" arent saved on the blockchain or anything like that, in fact the images arent decentralized at all (which kinda ruins the whole point). The images are stored on regular cloud storages like google drive and the thing you "own" on the blockchain is really just the image hash. Its like going to a car auction, paying the price of a lamborghini to then get a completely unique receipt that says you have purchased a lamborghini while the car still stands where you have seen it.
>what is ipfs
Very underrated channel, enjoyed the content. stayed for knowledge
3:28 if I ever was the person on the receiving end of ugly ape I would literly just say, 'nice paragraph bro, ain't reading that'
0:56 bro that plane and island are literally ripped from Bob's burgers💀
2:22 The person who posted the NFT does not own the art. They own a link to the art (usually on google drive), no copyrights were given to him when buying it. Stealing a profile picture is worse than stealing an NFT because the profile picture is actually made by someone with love, instead of for money, and with a randomly generating application. Plus profile pictures are way way cheaper than NFTs usually go for
The person doesn't even own the link, whoever owns the server owns the link. If the server owner decides to delete the "art" or point that link to something else then there's nothing the person that paid for the link can do about it legally because they don't own it. The person selling the NFT doesn't have the right to sell server storage space or address links.
>what is ipfs
NTF logic is basically...
If I tried to sell my own actual shit for millions of dollars because it's one of a kind and you can't get it from anywhere else :/
If we had the choice to get rid of furries or nft bros I would delete nft bros so fucking fast
What is the actual profile of a NFT'er and how do they come about? Insecure stockbro, hypebeast and furry all in one?
Oh shit the ultimate combo
They aren't furries. Furries are suspiciously wealthy but at least they pay for appealing art, unlike this computer-generated trash.
Found the furry
@@Abraxium I mean, he right.