2016 Toyota Mirai FCV - Fuel Cell System | Toyota

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 ก.ย. 2024
  • Watch to find out more about the inner workings of Toyota’s Mirai fuel cell sedan.
    SUBSCRIBE: bit.ly/ToyotaSu...
    About Toyota:
    We’re in the business of making great cars and trucks. But we also work every day to apply and share our know-how in ways that benefit people, the community and our planet in order to build a better tomorrow. We’ve been a part of life in America for over 50 years. And while we’re passionate about making great cars and trucks, our story is about much more than our vehicles.
    Connect with Toyota USA online:
    Visit the Toyota WEBSITE: bit.ly/ToyotaSite
    Like Toyota on FACEBOOK: bit.ly/ToyotaUSAFB
    Follow Toyota on TWITTER: bit.ly/ToyotaTw...
    Follow Toyota on INSTAGRAM: bit.ly/ToyotaInsta
    +1 Toyota on GOOGLE+: bit.ly/ToyotaUS...
    2016 Toyota Mirai FCV - Fuel Cell System | Toyota
    / toyotausa

ความคิดเห็น • 170

  • @shubhambhavsar1454
    @shubhambhavsar1454 7 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    Elon mask got an intensive heart attack after watching this video😂😂😂

  • @zachsnyder6877
    @zachsnyder6877 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    I would only have one concern, in the area I live in we get close to 0 all winter long, when they say the gas turns into water, wouldn't those plates be freezing cold and freeze it almost instantly since it's that small of a content of water? Great concept tho I would love to drive one.

  • @sathyanarayana5009
    @sathyanarayana5009 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Is this car comming to 🇮🇳

  • @LadyCafwenSnape
    @LadyCafwenSnape 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    So where would you buy the hydrogen from and how would they 'harvest' it?

  • @roger_oahu
    @roger_oahu 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    now that's dope tech!

    • @lordvalmart9774
      @lordvalmart9774 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ^^^ now that's a shill! ^^^

    • @lizzynicole2620
      @lizzynicole2620 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      kuhio1987 hjkkygjoh and said kljkmmkbgf

  • @k_alex
    @k_alex 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is impressive.

  • @JaspreetSinghArtist
    @JaspreetSinghArtist 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    i really wish if other manufacturers also work on similar technology

  • @noakhrot
    @noakhrot 9 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    $57,000 and its not even a Lexus..... with only 4 seats,,, great start but not without disappointments.

  • @cvma83
    @cvma83 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    congratulations for TOYOTA

  • @mitropoulosilias
    @mitropoulosilias 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    two questions:
    1)Fuell cell lifetime
    2)is it enviromental friendly? how much power does it takes to create hydrogen at first place..?

  • @llaser1433
    @llaser1433 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    But how long will you be able to drive?

  • @masarati7315
    @masarati7315 9 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    TOYOTA MIRAI EXPERIENCE: Yesterday I went to drive test in Berkeley, CA a Toyota Mirai. My conclusion: I definitely would not buy it for the following reasons: hydrogen fuel available only in a few pumps and only in California, you couldn't operate it outside the State. The cost of fuel is between, 6 to $11 a kilo, which is the equivalent of a gallon of gasoline, Toyota claims that the fuel efficiency is 40 Miles a Kilo, probably this is under the best circumstances. The price is $57,500 plus taxes, I think that any car in excess of 30,000 pays luxury taxes, I didn't see anything luxurious about this car. The car is very low, low enough to hit the curve, badly, if you come too close. And many other features that I didn't like, let alone that it is a new technology that they are trying to push, an as new technology has not been tested enough in the market. I could give you more input, however I don't feel like writing anymore.

    • @alyssaa7947
      @alyssaa7947 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Depending on what you were referring to as "a Kilo", one kiloliter equals about 264 gallons, which means the hydrogen is less costly, so more bang for your buck to drive the Mirai. Or a kilogram, which is about 0.26 gallons, so in this case gasoline is cheaper and it is more costly to drive the Mirai fuel wise.

  • @mdmahim94
    @mdmahim94 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This car come to Bangladesh on 2021

  • @haydentuttle9870
    @haydentuttle9870 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hydrogen can be produced using renewable energy such as geothermal, hydroelectric or solar.

  • @avkurt
    @avkurt 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    You are still tied to a pump and someone has to sell the HHO, What we need is a car that converts water H2O to HHO and burn the HHO, still no emissions and the output is water, oh yeah I guy did that but was shot in the face and his work was taking. Still I like it but we can do even better. By converting H2O to HHO we can use the cars we already have instead of buying a new car. It would be nice to run my jeep wrangler on H2O or gas, gives you alot of options.

  • @VictorHugo-sx6zv
    @VictorHugo-sx6zv 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I bet the hydrogen is going to be expensive af 😑

    • @etherflow
      @etherflow 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      It's about the same price as gas + if you buy it they give you 3 years of free hydrogen

    • @VictorHugo-sx6zv
      @VictorHugo-sx6zv 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +Justin D 3 years of free hydrogen? For a 50 grand sounds about right haha

    • @frankr2117
      @frankr2117 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      y

    • @shandellemckay2300
      @shandellemckay2300 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      w as

    • @FebiMaster
      @FebiMaster 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hydrogen can be created using electrolysis, but it will take large amounts of energy for it, and I believe in the near future our renewable energy technology will improve and can be used for making Hydrogen

  • @super-sim1665
    @super-sim1665 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hydrogen takes double the energy to make. Small battery packs would limit the performance. So it's like a ev but slower, more expensive and fuel price is double and explodes. Na.

  • @teshane8784
    @teshane8784 7 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    This technology has my full support. Very lovely piece of engineering that is environmentally friendly. Wish it was available here in Jamaica; GO TOYOTA!!!

  • @rameshr9189
    @rameshr9189 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Good job
    It's environment friendly
    But cost is uneconomical...

  • @n001m002
    @n001m002 9 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    The fruit of Toyota engineers efforts. Really nice.

  • @agostonberko
    @agostonberko 9 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    TOYOTA IS AMAZING

    • @jazmineestrada7886
      @jazmineestrada7886 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      Vicenefernandez

    • @christalmontes5487
      @christalmontes5487 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      I v b m

    • @agostonberko
      @agostonberko 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ***** compared to another CE "development", this project is fun & innovative. you never know when this technology will be useful in the upcoming years.

  • @kotarokojima6305
    @kotarokojima6305 9 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    why few people dislike this this this very interesting

    • @mishaparem
      @mishaparem 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      +kotaro kojima Maybe because if a hydrogen tank that size gets damaged, that car, and at least three other cars near it will go up in smoke, and leave many little bits of scorched human flesh flying through the air, mixed with burning plastic from the cars, and fragments of metal traveling at substantial speeds, which will further increase the kill zone.

    • @frankzeyer9959
      @frankzeyer9959 9 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      +Mikhail Paremski (mishaparem)
      Thats the common misbeleive and fairytale.
      If even damaged, nearly nothing happens: The hydrogen vents out in seconds and will mix up with the common Air, thats all. Even if it will ignited by some circumstance of the damage, there is a single hot blue flame for a very very short time (seconds) but usualy not long enough to inflame the (usualy heavy inflameable) seats and plastics of the cars; like gasoline does regulary, spitting all over the place.
      You think I am talking shit? Take your time and go deeper into the theme and see, how the tanks are actualy made and what they realy do, if punctured by a car accident.
      LG, Frank
      from Germany

    • @reking.325
      @reking.325 9 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      +EXCURSION I also have seen lots of negative comments and I don't really understand why. This technology is taking its very first steps and it obviously has negative aspects, just like petrol or even electric cars have.
      I read so many comments from people that are attacking fuel cell technology so badly I'm starting to think they're getting paid from big oil companies. Or they are just plainly stupid.

    • @mishaparem
      @mishaparem 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      1) If I remember correctly, fuel cell technology uses many rare earth metals. This means that it's going to be very expensive. The current trend in government is if it's more "green" lets make regulations to replace everything with this "green" technology by the year XXXX. I don't want to be forced into buying something ridiculously expensive because it's more green - I don't have that kind of money.
      2) 2H2+O2>2H2O is an efficient process. 2H20>2H2+O2 is not. Thus, while the car IS efficient, the "fuel plant" IS NOT efficient. The inefficiency of the fuel plant is not compensated by the efficiency of a car in this case. So we'll be using MORE energy to power cars. We haven't replaced the current demand for energy with clean sources of energy yet, so the question is - where will we get this additional demand for energy from? The answer - probably more oil and coal plants.
      3) Storing a compressible gas is tricky business. A tank for storing compressible gasses has a finite lifespan - it is determined by the fatigue that the tank experiences from the difference in pressure between a full tank and an empty tank. Furthermore, these extremes can be pushed outside of manufacturer limits by hot and cold outside temperature. Combine that with the fact that you're storing a highly volatile gas, and you've got a bomb that is set to detonate after X amount of refuel cycles. That means that you will HAVE to replace the tank, or it can explode. Some people will inevitably try to push that boundary. Keep in mind that the proposal is to put these bombs in every car on the road. How many car accidents do you see per year? Each one of those will have the potential to set off a chain reaction of hydrogen explosions.
      4) People who oppose this idea are people who did their research, and know more than the "fluff" that is being thrown around in the media to get media hype on this technology's side. Educate yourself. Determine whether or not it's a viable solution. Then argue for or against it. This whole, "I don't really know anything about it, but it sounds awesome, I don't know why people are against it." is ridiculous.

    • @livapaleja7812
      @livapaleja7812 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      kotaro kojima I love Hydrogen! It can do big things!

  • @thetinfoiltricorn7797
    @thetinfoiltricorn7797 8 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Come up with a portable hydrogen generator so that people can make their own hydrogen fuel even when in remote places using the sun, or other sources and you've got it made.

    • @the-expertstreetb-racer5832
      @the-expertstreetb-racer5832 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      The Tinfoil Tricorn That’s a life saving idea!

    • @innosam123
      @innosam123 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The Tinfoil Tricorn Needs too much electricity. You can, however, generate hydrogen from water on-site at a hydrogen station.

  • @802haris
    @802haris 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    At least EV has a competitor who will be the future.

  • @Nicholas-f5
    @Nicholas-f5 9 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Pretty awesome, just be sure to use renewable hydrogen, not fracked gas!

  • @Sickboyfriend
    @Sickboyfriend 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I heard that if price of hydrogen is converted into price of gasoline then it would be $4 per gallon.
    Of course, the pricing of hydrogen hasn't come out yet. I could be wrong. But I doubt I'll be wrong by much.

  • @asyriusslayer19
    @asyriusslayer19 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is really cool! I remember reading about the idea of hydrogen powered cars in a car book for kids when I was 6 or 7 years old. Now I can see it actually being produced! Very neat, would love to learn more!

  • @abstractexchange5057
    @abstractexchange5057 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    hydrogen is the only right variant for future. No other variant ! But we are developing approach, which is not exact now. There must be 2 waves for hydrogen : 1/BUILD HYDROGEN PRODUCTION FACTORIES ON SITES OF RENEWABLE ENERGY STATIONS. 2/ SMALL CARS NEED TO LOAD HYDROGEN BY EXCHANGING WHOLE COMPRESSED HYDROGEN BALLOONS.
    We are wrong because we do not firstly build enough hydrogen production factories on sites of renewable energy stations. We are wrong because we are trying to build network of hydrogen loading stations, which are COMPLEX AND EXPENSIVE.
    We must change our approach. We should use hydrogen as energy storage method for renewable energy stations first. Then we should load hydrogen for usual small cars by exchanging whole standard sized compressed hydrogen gas balloons. So It is very simple and not expensive to make the global net of hydrogen supplying stations. Any normal mini shops can be a hydrogen supplying point by storing standard sized compressed hydrogen gas balloons. We do not have to use liquid hydrogen, which is difficult to collect. But we can use compressed hydrogen gas, which is not so much different in weight by comparison with liquid hydrogen. Hydrogen is the best solution of energy storage for all energy stations now, for example, for nuclear energy stations, for renewable energy stations. Just install ready hydrogen production modules, and install independent hydrogen fuel cell modules in adjacent areas. Use compressed hydrogen gas at first time instead of liquid hydrogen.
    And the last thing to notice is that, hydrogen is not more dangerous than other gases and petrol. Hydrogen has big energy storage capacity, but when burning hydrogen in accidents, IT DOES NOT CREATE ACOUSTIC DESTRUCTING WAVE TO ENVIRONMENTS. It means that hydrogen burning is less destructive than gasoline burning.

  • @actraveler8309
    @actraveler8309 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    When I was at Savanna River National Labs 10 years ago I saw the hydrogen fuel cell R&D. Toyota tech had an area restricted and taped off. It was cool seeing the scientists work on it

  • @StarryTemplar
    @StarryTemplar 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    WHen it crashed will it be a hydrogen bomb??!!!

    • @louielambretta389
      @louielambretta389 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      no it would be a hydrogen rocket that will fly you to mars

    • @expeloco
      @expeloco 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      New Space X killer

  • @dslice9647
    @dslice9647 9 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Great video. Always had high hopes for hydrogen, hopefully automotive manufacturers put in the effort to start setting up an infrastructure.

  • @h2innovationlabh2il69
    @h2innovationlabh2il69 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you from 'H2 Innovation Lab' H2IL technology for a green sustainable hydrogen future.

  • @abouttogetlit5120
    @abouttogetlit5120 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is anyone else wondering what’s going to happen when someone rear ends one of these and hits the “high pressure tank?”

  • @LifeofLin
    @LifeofLin 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    2019 Mirai predictions: will still have 4 seats, better ports for USB charging and a larger wireless Qi charger, refreshed look that's less "angular" and extended range by 25%.
    Like this comment if you agree, and we'll check back in a year :)

    • @TobyCostaRica
      @TobyCostaRica 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      I hope so because the USB port in the back is stupid.

  • @xaltotungreat2000
    @xaltotungreat2000 9 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Great car and a great idea! To drive without emissions means cities without smog and pollution. With some progress in hydrogen production this certainly will be a revolution.

  • @FgtTunning
    @FgtTunning 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow they r trying everything to make us pay for free water that we can do by ourselves. OHO

  • @TS0G0
    @TS0G0 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    they should have made it with self hydrogen making! In this case owner of this car has to stop by hydrogen stations!

  • @kubanskiloewe
    @kubanskiloewe 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    there are a few car share companies in germany who have 10-20 of them in their fleet and all i know is that they are surprised how well they work with nearly no cost of maintenance ! I wait till Lexus will offer a nice fat SUV with it ;-)

  • @BestoftheBestz
    @BestoftheBestz 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Good bye Tesla?

  • @wandryrafael
    @wandryrafael 8 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Can't wait to see all NYC Cap drivers with one of these 😒

  • @joegore1
    @joegore1 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    How would an individual make HIGH PRESSURE hydrogen for use in this car. That setup would probably cost more than the car.

  • @MrEinherj
    @MrEinherj 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    How will work in winter (if is temperature less than 0°C)?

  • @Trades46
    @Trades46 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    I still think Battery electric will be the way to go, but some people need to drive long distances often may find Hydrogen Fuel Cell may be more convenient than any high powered fast charging stations in existence. I think the biggest benefit maybe for trucks which need to do long distances but don't want to waste time sitting at charging stations.

  • @visi3475
    @visi3475 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Revolution !!! is here Toyota mirai is feature( hydrogen is going to expensive)

  • @kztkrk
    @kztkrk 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    "Mirai" means "future" in Japanese.
    This car is just in an experimental stage.
    Let's see whether Mirai proves the future or not.

    • @brucecassady2338
      @brucecassady2338 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      +sakko Not experimental...actually selling them....

    • @peterfireflylund
      @peterfireflylund 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Only in homoeopathic numbers. Last I checked it was less than a thousand units delivered world-wide. Wikipedia says a few thousand have been ordered.

  • @ItsKapow
    @ItsKapow 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Does anyone know what the range would be?

  • @AlphaSphere
    @AlphaSphere 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    It seems like auto makers feel like they should design some bonkers looking cars for the next gen. I don't really get why.

  • @redpillrobo7
    @redpillrobo7 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    In my opinion this is one of the most exciting technologies since the space race.

  • @Kywdo1
    @Kywdo1 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Congratulations !!!
    You can write again (like in 70's):
    * My Toyota is fantastic *.
    PS:
    A * Mirai-generator * is able to produce electricity for about 100 apartments (in Romania).
    Thank you for your efforts !!!
    Again:
    Congratulations !!!

  • @TruthIsKey369
    @TruthIsKey369 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    wow, 177 Tesla fans dissing hydrogen cars, go figure

  • @tubesarkilar
    @tubesarkilar 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    they won't do HHO on demand cause people would start converting existing cars not buy as many FCV's.

    • @dslice9647
      @dslice9647 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'm pretty sure that's not the reason they went with pure hydrogen. Also, I think HHO conversion isn't as simple as it seems. It'd be more of a fad with only a few systems that would actually work reliably. Much like HHO today!

  • @AllFallBeforeMe
    @AllFallBeforeMe 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Didnt stan meyers do this back in the 80s and got killed over it?

  • @yasutakeuchi
    @yasutakeuchi 9 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Genius science. Genius business. Great for the planet and for our health. Why anyone would dislike this video is beyond me.

  • @FgtTunning
    @FgtTunning 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    U can make ur car as it is run on water don't be fooled by those companies trying to make u pay for water gas.

  • @pantium
    @pantium 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can we drink those exhausted H2O (water)? If so, the future model should include a cold water dispenser like the refrigerator in the cabin.

  • @AttilioClemente
    @AttilioClemente 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    This Toyota Mirai is really impressive. Hydrogen vehicles are indeed the future….. provided the hydrogen is produced with renewable energy.
    Sadly, at present a “dirty” hydrogen is used because it is produced transforming coal, oil or natural gas which, consequently, will generate twice as much CO2 than directly burning these fossil fuels.
    Well, I do not mind it, because meanwhile people will get use to hydrogen and a large net of refuelling station will be built.
    One day, I hope soon, people will “discover” that this system is available also for using clean hydrogen produced with renewable energy and then…… a real beautiful future for our planet will start.

  • @thwong1212
    @thwong1212 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Traditional car marker fully understand where the money come from, is from the service check and repair. Simple EV use a battery, recharge and then can run the motor, but this kind of Fuel cell looks convenient, but it is very stupid indeed, it still contains a battery, add you 2 fuel cell unit for repair (high cost), and with the motor as well, why dont use the battery to directly run the motor? Fuel Cell Technology want you to keep giving business to them through repair and servicing, they need you to have so many things that require fixing and repair like gasoline car.

  • @xuxamelo
    @xuxamelo 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Where do they plan to get the hydrogen from? From water? How much energy it will be needed in order to break water molecule? The only upside from hydrogen Fuel Cell is that you don't need a huge battery. However, now they will produce almost for free batteries and the lithium free (source is sodium)... this is not the right path, but I might be wrong!

  • @viloam
    @viloam 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hydrogen was not neccesary. Fuel cells are more efficient than internal combustion engines. You could use Natural Gas. provided the fuel cell technology allows it. Also hydrogen is expensive and is taken out mostly from natural gas compared to electrolysis. It is more difficult to store hydrogen than Natural gas as hydrogen leaks. Also we can create methane gas through human waste. In India we use cow dung.

  • @jameslonergan5840
    @jameslonergan5840 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    We need Hydrogen fuel stations across the country. I cannot buy one of these in Wisconsin.

    • @RelaxedKoi
      @RelaxedKoi 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      James Lonergan They have some stations already.

  • @KungFuChess
    @KungFuChess 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great step forward but gas vehicles will be around for a long while

    • @LoganTheBladesEdge
      @LoganTheBladesEdge 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      KungFuChess now if they could only make a car that would harness the power of my natural gas!

  • @mariarundquist1674
    @mariarundquist1674 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    I like it

  • @gowriprasath7564
    @gowriprasath7564 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    which type of material is used for storing hydrogen fuel in mirai?

  • @muhammadrifqi7063
    @muhammadrifqi7063 9 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Moga berkah dan diterima masyarakat

  • @Derp0Army
    @Derp0Army 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wait so it is stripping the air of oxygen to make it water?

  • @18magicMARKer
    @18magicMARKer 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    pretty pathetic that such a high tech car doesn't have apple carplay. Seat and Steering wheel moves away but you have to manually move the trunk to open it?

  • @one198811
    @one198811 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    A nice idea beyond the "T", however, it looks ugly. seriously? TOYOTA?

  • @marinalopez2177
    @marinalopez2177 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    f2f

  • @wynos0
    @wynos0 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The comparison with EV's with 24 kWh batteries is not fair, Tesla Model S which is similarly priced has up to a 90 kWh battery. And the Model S is considerably faster, has roughly the same range, has good recharging infrastructure, and is on sale in many more markets than the Mirai. Hydrogen may be used to power big trucks and buses in the future, but to power a normal car it's excessively complicated and takes too much space in the. Sorry Toyota, you should have used those billions of R&D money to battery technology instead of this nonsense.

    • @wynos0
      @wynos0 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      *in the car.

  • @leilamissen4887
    @leilamissen4887 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The fundamental question is whether we can maintain and manage the car. From the viewpoint of cost, all performance is inferior to EV.

    • @BestoftheBestz
      @BestoftheBestz 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Leila, let me know if you find an answer i'm really interested.

  • @warwickbull5559
    @warwickbull5559 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    As concept Hydrogen cars offer the best of both fossil fuel and electric powered cars.

  • @stektirade
    @stektirade 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    So much better than batteries, which are twice as worse for the environment as a traditional internal combistion engine.

  • @nazivasd6325
    @nazivasd6325 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Got

  • @adehomesproduction1640
    @adehomesproduction1640 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    50

  • @s87583
    @s87583 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank.

  • @AtliTobiasson
    @AtliTobiasson 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Try bloom energy!

  • @MrMorganf15
    @MrMorganf15 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Muy interesante. Quiero uno en Puerto Rico

  • @deesky216
    @deesky216 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Нас ждет глобальное потопление, ведь воды станет больше)))).

  • @displayedimagination9710
    @displayedimagination9710 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can it come with a manual transmission ?

  • @kriscreswell315
    @kriscreswell315 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you for all the patents. what a game changer! the most abundant element in existence, instead of war causing refined minerals..the end of the petro dollar and rise of the middle class? holyguacamole if electricity is derived from a solar panel or windmill the battery bank should be green. how hard would it be to pull air through graphene into a electrolysis unit and have a constantly cooled/ operating infinity engine. would it be better on say a boat?

    • @joegore1
      @joegore1 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      You forgot the flux capacitor

  • @iam1st88
    @iam1st88 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    prepreg winding or wet winding???

  • @okon6113
    @okon6113 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Toyota 🖤

  • @szaki
    @szaki 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Just in time, when we have droughts and water shortages?

  • @serikbabakhumar6868
    @serikbabakhumar6868 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    hello..from Mongolia..I like it

  • @raybodie2816
    @raybodie2816 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    How much energy does it take to liberate the hydrogen used as the fuel? More or less than for powering a car with gasoline?

    • @joegore1
      @joegore1 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Shhh. Don't say that to loud. Hydrogen is politically correct, not the coal to make it.

  • @dashercronin
    @dashercronin 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why bother with a costly fuel cell? Why not use hydrogen instead of gasoline to run an internal combustion engine? BMW had one 15 years ago.Are all these initiatives created just to slow down the move away from fossil fuels?

    • @sarahgonzalez1300
      @sarahgonzalez1300 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Okay h kao immunotherapy pr Kal*j ka I, I

    • @sarahgonzalez1300
      @sarahgonzalez1300 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Okay h kao immunoI 7 kl ptherapy pr Kal*j ka I, I

  • @andrihantoro4671
    @andrihantoro4671 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    like it

  • @DanishSpeakerChannel
    @DanishSpeakerChannel 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    The design could be better

  • @mrbigtimegammer
    @mrbigtimegammer 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    First they need to start placing those HHO pumps across the country, while slowly introducing this car. Place them at current gas pumps, then slowly remove gas stations and replace with HHO. As for people keeping older versions of cars, they should at least keep one version of each older pumps. Maybe offer people the ability to have their car reworked to incorporate this technology when it starts to become the dominate fuel source. When we reach 99% of the population driving these cars, we could switch completely over to HHO pumps and FCV engines. Boom we gone green!

  • @saldi3543
    @saldi3543 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Good Job Toyota

  • @tomaszakarauskas7174
    @tomaszakarauskas7174 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    But isn`t electricity is needed to produce hydrogen ? and then you make electricity from it, sounds strange, may be im wrong.

    • @joegore1
      @joegore1 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      They will make the hydrogen with coal. Much more efficient to just burn coal in a steam car.

    • @tomaszakarauskas7174
      @tomaszakarauskas7174 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      But still its strange, you need two types of production to make this fuel, and the price of going with hydrogen is not so much cheaper than petrol. So why not use just electricity? But that would mean you can charge it where ever you want. Of course that's just my remark.

    • @mickeyholmes8100
      @mickeyholmes8100 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      Tomas Zakarauskas sxd
      /Can. DCF /mcmxllllacfnjk? tnserhtg yj ♣♦↩↪①®©②↙↖↔◀▶▪‼♥⑩↘⑧✴✖✖⑦➡dd Dec phial
      Leland
      Happens

  • @maykevin5
    @maykevin5 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    great, so instead of using up all the oil, the will use up all the oxygen.

    • @menolastnameneeded1023
      @menolastnameneeded1023 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      no

    • @kriaz
      @kriaz 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      +maykevin5 we are already using oxygen to burn oil...

    • @artemisf0wl
      @artemisf0wl 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Haha I hope you're joking

  • @donkanis6141
    @donkanis6141 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hydrogen Fool Cell$

  • @onichi2995
    @onichi2995 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    :)

  • @agugar7
    @agugar7 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fav song right now!

  • @just1lifexx11
    @just1lifexx11 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    very nice. . im stick of refilling gas..

  • @gowriprasath7564
    @gowriprasath7564 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    bcz hydrogen is highly corrosive

  • @MrGgzzzz
    @MrGgzzzz 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice ^^

  • @raghausarvade8653
    @raghausarvade8653 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    superb

  • @FebiMaster
    @FebiMaster 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is this using liquid Hydrogen or the gaseous state?

    • @RelaxedKoi
      @RelaxedKoi 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      FebriyanWP I think liquid gas wouldn't make much sense. who knows though.

    • @FebiMaster
      @FebiMaster 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      BiohazardGA I mean, liquid hydrogen are more compressed than its gas form of hydrogen, but it require cooling because hydrogen turns liquid in subzero temperature

    • @toto943
      @toto943 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It is pressurized hydrogen which is stored in high pressure tanks.