ECHO PB-9010T Review! World's STRONGEST Backpack Blower!!!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 ส.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 41

  • @RuggedIndividual1990
    @RuggedIndividual1990 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Probably colder denser air gave it a higher blowing force. Still blows hard during the summer months but I notice more power when it’s cold (I.e. time of year when leafs fall). Echo did a good job. Pro tip: squeeze throttle to take it off choke

    • @joshsrcs
      @joshsrcs  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Cold air definitely gives it a boost, but on a block this small you don’t notice too much of a difference as it behaved much like it did in the summer. You’re right, Echo did an insanely good job engineering this blower! SUBSCRIBE!!!

    • @RuggedIndividual1990
      @RuggedIndividual1990 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@joshsrcs yes agreed but I was referring to the blower design itself (the pump). Seems like Echo used colder air in their design calculations because I definitely notice more power out of the tube when the air is cold and dense vs. summer months.

  • @oscarrosalws5655
    @oscarrosalws5655 ปีที่แล้ว

    Best blower I've used. For leaf clran ups is massive. Will clean up in no time.

  • @brenthill5596
    @brenthill5596 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I love my 9010T but I often find myself grabbing my Redmax EBZ 8500 instead.

  • @yycguy8722
    @yycguy8722 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The main issues I’ve come to discover with this blower not often discussed… 1. The weight is slightly higher then every other blower on the market. 2. The blower tube does not separate or shorten for work in tight spaces. 3. The fuel consumption is the highest of any other blower on the market. Other then that, it has amazing power for moving large amounts of material without question.

    • @joshsrcs
      @joshsrcs  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      1 and 3 are correct but have never ever been a problem for me, but 2 is not correct as the end of the tube does separate into about 3 pieces. Thanks for watching! SUBSCRIBE!!!

  • @pkdude5334
    @pkdude5334 ปีที่แล้ว

    my subwoofer is liking that intro

  • @rugerswrestling1341
    @rugerswrestling1341 ปีที่แล้ว

    You are hilarious,definitely make more lawn care content! Great video

    • @joshsrcs
      @joshsrcs  ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks! I’ll make sure to do some more lawn care content!

  • @RFHX2_6.0
    @RFHX2_6.0 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Maybe next time you can make a dry leaf wall and drive your Xmaxx through it? Pretty soon you gona have to change your name to “Josh’s lawn equipment” 😂

    • @joshsrcs
      @joshsrcs  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      😂😂😂 I should really think of a better name to combine the two, or I can just change the channel name to my real name, which is what it used to be.

  • @noahpeters010
    @noahpeters010 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You should see the Redmax ebz 9000!

  • @cartoonkiiller8812
    @cartoonkiiller8812 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Stihl 800C has the echo beat , I own both , echo is heavier, power , comfort, durable Stihl wins.

  • @elviskeon5615
    @elviskeon5615 ปีที่แล้ว

    No doubt about it, the Newtons on the 9010 easily beat the BR800. But, like another reviewer noted, it needs the larger tank, because it eats fuel. You could come close to buying a new 800 every other year with the fuel savings you get. Better check your db ratings as well, the Echo is no quieter than the STIHL.

    • @joshsrcs
      @joshsrcs  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Power comes at a price… a price that I am willing to pay. It doesn’t use as much gas as people think. One tank lasts me hours and hours of work. BR-800 dB is 78, PB-9010 dB is 80, so not much difference. Not helping myself either seeing that I did some exhaust mods to my 9010T. Fuel consumption is relative seeing that the 9010 will likely get the job done faster than the BR-800 and dB rating just depends on what kind of hearing protection you use (I use 32dB rated earplugs). Also it doesn’t EAT fuel it drinks* it 😁

  • @AngelSilverFourtySeven
    @AngelSilverFourtySeven 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The editing 🤣💀👌🏽👍🏼

    • @joshsrcs
      @joshsrcs  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I’m glad someone appreciates it!!! SUBSCRIBE!!!

  • @g.b-MTB-trail-jumps3062
    @g.b-MTB-trail-jumps3062 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Cool my friend👑

  • @MMRC69
    @MMRC69 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome channel! I subbed!

    • @joshsrcs
      @joshsrcs  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks dude!

  • @clay1883
    @clay1883 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It has a bigger tank because it uses a lot more fuel than the competition. Just curious, but why would you pitch your helmet to the ground?

    • @joshsrcs
      @joshsrcs  ปีที่แล้ว

      1. Excellent observation.
      2. If my helmet can’t take being tossed on some leaves it won’t protect me in a crash.
      Thanks for watching! SUBSCRIBE!!!

  • @cagatay4773
    @cagatay4773 ปีที่แล้ว

    amazing

  • @chriskennedy7262
    @chriskennedy7262 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    i bought the 8010 before this came out happy i did

    • @joshsrcs
      @joshsrcs  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yea man anyone who can get their hands on these things know how awesome they are! SUBSCRIBE!!!

    • @chriskennedy7262
      @chriskennedy7262 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@joshsrcs done man :)

  • @user-rc8sq8en2w
    @user-rc8sq8en2w 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What's that sound

  • @AB-coyote
    @AB-coyote 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I was loving this review until you said NGK was cheap. NGK is a great plug for multiple applications. E3 is snake oil.

    • @joshsrcs
      @joshsrcs  6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I can reason with that. E3 has worked for me in the past, but I’ve realized they are overhyped. For these small engines the E3’s do quite well and I do believe they are better than the stock NGK’s although there’s not anything wrong with them. Honestly hate the E3’s in my 7.5L truck and love the NGK’s in my Focus RS so I’m mixed on both brands.

  • @anthonygordon1131
    @anthonygordon1131 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    You need a big tank because it does use a lot of fuel.

    • @joshsrcs
      @joshsrcs  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Well… actually considering how massive the motor is it actually doesn’t use that much fuel. It would probably take you an hour of off an on heavy blowing to run the tank dry. You are right that it does need a big fuel tank, but a lot of people think that this blower consumes a lot more fuel than it actually does. SUBSCRIBE!!!

    • @got2getit204
      @got2getit204 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@joshsrcs know it drinks you might catch it in a bar drinking!

    • @Slim1423
      @Slim1423 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@joshsrcs You get your moneys worth with the Echo 9010T. You can move more leaves on a gallon of gas than with most other brand blowers, from what i see. Personally, i have the Echo 755ST, and that is working pretty good for me so far. My blower holds a half gallon of fuel, and will run about 1 hour. Leaf blowing jobs at home used to rake me 9 to 11 hours with other brands blowers, but now i can get my leaf work done in 3 to 4 hours! I wish i would have known the quality of Echo gas power tools many years ago, because i went throw many various brands of gas powered tools over the years. I plan to go all Echo eventually. If you have a serious amount of leaves, like acres of leaves, then either a Echo 8010T or 9010T will most likely get the job done and fast!! I like Echo blowers because they are designed to perform well with leaf removal. Echo has leaf blowing broken down to a science, they understand the needs of the customers. Just make sure to get a Echo blower with enough power, plus some extra power to get your leaf job done.

    • @joshsrcs
      @joshsrcs  ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Slim1423 There’s no replacement for displacement! Thoughts on a 1 year review? Thanks.

  • @TheDunceMafia
    @TheDunceMafia 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Imagine using 2 9010 that would be 2220 cfm 💀💀

  • @andrewrush3605
    @andrewrush3605 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Helmet is trash now

    • @joshsrcs
      @joshsrcs  10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      🤣🤣not in the slightest