@@justinnicholson4906 However it’s also raised several inches from the Legacy, you can see the bumper protrusion from the ram hitting just above the rocker panel on the Outback VS. further up the door on most of the other sedans. I’m no expert with this but that seems like it would just naturally provide an advantage in this scenario.
@@Poopsticle_256 The difference in suspension is only about 2 inches. That cant be accounted for in these tests regardless because these crash test cars are typically bare bones. Aka, they remove the engine, transmission and other components because it doesn't make any sense to destroy them in these tests. But either way, the ride height will be changed due to that. There are certain cost cutting methods that just can't be worked around, making all tests unfair to an extent. Not to mention hitting higher up, especially in a subaru with the locking pegs on the doors, should reduce the impact by using the door as a crumple zone.
@@justinnicholson4906 I suppose so, but when it’s a comparison between multiple different vehicles in a similar size category, it just seems off to me. Also, while hitting higher on the door would likely absorb more energy in an impact, wouldn’t it also increase the intrusion into the cabin, as opposed to essentially hitting the floorpan? Genuine question there
@@Poopsticle_256 Certainly could, but subaru doors act as steel cables when impacted. They have a peg that allows them to become under incredible tension to keep from coming to far into the cabin. The only reason they used the outback here is because it is nearly identical to the legacy, so ir doesn't make sense to use a legacy, and an outback for all of the crash test. Because keep in mind, this is just a few tests out of hundreds.
I did, Noticed how the Hyundai had a better time? its all because Hyundai hired a huge bunch of the Toyota Engineers to help make their brand the premium brand it is now. There might be a day when someone asks you want planet you were born on if you think Toyota is reliable, that's not today but if they keep going down hill they will ruin their reputation and eventually a huge chunk of the market share as a lot of automotive manufactures are looking to regicide them from their throne
Yes the Subaru has a greater ground clearance which means the rocket panel is higher and more leveled with the crash bar of a t-bond vehicle. So it provides a greater resistance. And Subaru does not position Outback as a full size sedan.
Yeah it’s a station wagon. I guess they chose the outback instead of the Legacy because the Outback is more popular, and there are pretty much no other affordable Wagons sold in the US so it makes a more interesting watch.
The latest crash test regulations have been upgraded. The Malibu platform stays in 2015. It is an older version than other cars. However, when looking at actual accident cases, Malibu drivers say that they are all fine and that Malibu is strong. You can't judge a car just by looking at the iihs video. And Korean cars are for both domestic and for export use, and the external use is manufactured to pass the test in accordance with safety regulations.
That Subaru should be in a separate video with wagons and SUVs. But we do see that a slightly lift vehicle may do better at this test because more of the frame is in the way. One I am interested to see and may do better is the new Toyota Crown. The lifted sedan may score just as well as the Subaru. Just saying. Even if these sedans aren't doing so well with this new test, personally I'd still get one over a crossover or an SUV due to fuel efficiency, simplicity, practicality, and space (as in, I don't take up space)
This is an unfortunate direction that cars are heading. Because of safety and love of SUVs/Trucks, vehicles on the road are getting heavier than 15 years ago. The leads to the National Highway authority to adjust the crash test to suit today's real-life-scenario. In respond, automakers will have to make their cars stronger and thus heavier which leads to ever heavier cars into the future. Then the IIHS will change the crash rules to be even more stringent. This cycle will continue to make vehicles heavier on the road.
@@adhirsh_ I suppose when battery tech improves and can be lighter then we could see cars losing weight again. automaker would love to reduce weight as that will reduce cost.
@@adhirsh_ I prefer low cars because they handle corners better. The IIHS has always slander to the Camry. And this VDO is trying to encourage you to buy the SUVs.
😢I just had car accident crashed by BMW X6 by side. My 2016 mini Cooper clubman has way more better than any one of those vehicles in the video. My mini was hit and slipped all most 2-3 meter. But My windows still well, only huge dent on driver side , and both front and left side airbags came out. My mini were diagnosed totally loss. Sad for this. I drove it more than 7 years. So So love my mini Cooper, mini as strong as a tank ❤❤thx !
Increasing side safety of cars creates other safety problems because of thickening of pillars. Increased weight leads to worse fuel consumption, already degraded because of emissions controls. Instead, decreasing the threat of modern supersized pickup trucks and SUVs through tax/lincensing or simply enforcing the existing laws against illegal truck modifications would be a better strategy.
@@Sashazur Tried driving a hyundai elantra and the thing has thicker pillars on the sides of the windshield than most 2000’s cars, and the thing is a mid-sized sedan
Hyundai Sonata is one of the most underrated car in the world I don't know why I am driving Sonata since 2019 and I am so so satisfied and happy with sonata 😊
Mashina olishda eng muhum jihat bu kuzuf tayota camry men oylagandek natija ko'rsata olmagandan afsusdaman videorolik uchun rahmat foydali video bo'ldi xamma uchun❤
Rankings in my opinion: 1. Subaru (as expected from being a bigger vehicle) 2. VW (German engineering showed to provide more structural integrity to the car) 3. Toyota (lack of structural integrity has accommodated for more damage, but the crash test here shows the dummies could easily walk away) 4. Honda (exterior did not take as much damage, but the dummies were more vulnerable due to less structural integrity to the frame) 5. Hyundai (quite the opposite as the Honda, but is likely the dummies could walk away from the accident, but body, frame, and interior damage make this unlikely) 6. Chevy (extensive body, frame, and interior damage) 7. Nissan (extensive body, frame, and interior damage, and the dummies were a lot more vulnerable due to lack of structural integrity)
I prefer low cars because they handle corners better. The IIHS has always slander to the Camry. And this VDO is trying to encourage you to buy the SUVs. The Camry has rear passenger airbags and the structure didn't collapse much. How can it be poor?
Subaru legacy also got a good rating in later testing. Outback and legacy have the exact same platform so it makes sense they performed in the same way
IDK that the Camry did any worse than say the Civic. And the Subaru is in a totally different class. So basically all the cars tested here were Acceptable at best, and half fell into the poor category. I think they should rethink their testing strategy (or rather their round-up and how they score). This also sounds like it's some "independent" testing lab, not one like the NHTSA which does their own testing and has their own scoring (although maybe somewhat similar) and the one that most people go by. The issue with these tests is there can be variables that are not accounted for (such as the exact size and weight of the simulated vehicle that hits the car).
These tests are somewhat deceptive. The battering ram that is suppose to be a car going at 35 mph does not have energy absorbent crumple zones or bumper. Just some solid material. If they wanted more credibility they would have used other cars to hit the parked test car.
How come they don’t do tests where they allow a car to hit another car? That’s real life situations, I had a 2007 Toyota Camry and it held up really well. It was the special edition
All these tests are unrealistic. People continue to die in crashes no matter what vehicle they drive, real crashes are a totally different thing, conditions vary, speed, road conditions, traffic, drivers reactions, drivers reflexes, drivers experience to dangerous situations, so no matter what I continue to buy Toyota, like other people trust others car manufacturers and we’re not thinking about these crash tests, because they are simply STUPID. Truck drivers get killed in a vehicle that may weigh 80,000 pounds and a deer comes across in front of the rig , and driver reacts poorly and flips the truck over, different that being t-boned but it’s in example that nobody is safe on the road where machines and operators interact with each other. Commit yourself to the Lord every day for he appoints the day we DIE, regardless of you driving a Subaru.
Не совсем, субару в этот тест не вписывается, это машина с высоким клиренсом, основной удар пришёлся в порог, самую сильную часть авто, соответственно такого сильного удара по стойке не было. Джета также сюда не подходит, здесь должен быть Пассат вместо неё, Джета меньше сравниваемых авто и можно заметить, как удар пришёлся на заднюю стойку автомобиля.
This test wasn’t reliable at all. The Subaru Outback is a crossover not a sedan, and all the sedans were in different trim level. There should be fairness in those aspects.
@@Невыесняй-л3л Subaru Outback - универсал, созданный на базе Subaru Legacy. Однако Subaru Outback предназначен для бездорожья, поэтому у него более высокий дорожный просвет. Однако это не внедорожник, хотя и может так выглядеть.
Hate to say it but the test have the impact zone set way too low. just take a look at those new suv, the top of hood is taller than the whole sedan. Test result changes dramatically with different impact zone.
I've always thought... if the vehicle gets a poor rating, then that manufacturer shouldn't be able to sell that car until it gets a better rating. This is consumer safety we're talking about.
The Subaru Outback is believe it or not is built on the same platform as the Subaru Legacy. The only reason why the Outback did better than the Legacy is because It sits a little higher up than its sedan twin, and because of that there was a little less intrusion into the occupant compartment.
I just got hit by a SUV Nissan 2016 when I was driving my Toyota Camry 2017 XLE Hybrid, all her airbags got deployed and my not I want to know she got a total lost and now I only wants to know is was a fail of airbags or the car need a worst impact.
That's according to government agencies. Talking to people on the street, you'll hear people call Altimas/Accords/Camrys as "small" cars, even by small (5'8" 140 lbs) guys.
Crying that im trying so hard and working yet I can’t afford a Camry , my dream car . Now im watching a video of someone destroying it . What an unfair world
The comparison should have been with the Subaru Legacy sedan not the Outback Wagon/SUV variant to be completely fair to the other sedans.
Subaru Outback is the exact same unibody and frame as a Subaru legacy. Thats why the test is the same.
@@justinnicholson4906 However it’s also raised several inches from the Legacy, you can see the bumper protrusion from the ram hitting just above the rocker panel on the Outback VS. further up the door on most of the other sedans. I’m no expert with this but that seems like it would just naturally provide an advantage in this scenario.
@@Poopsticle_256 The difference in suspension is only about 2 inches. That cant be accounted for in these tests regardless because these crash test cars are typically bare bones. Aka, they remove the engine, transmission and other components because it doesn't make any sense to destroy them in these tests. But either way, the ride height will be changed due to that. There are certain cost cutting methods that just can't be worked around, making all tests unfair to an extent. Not to mention hitting higher up, especially in a subaru with the locking pegs on the doors, should reduce the impact by using the door as a crumple zone.
@@justinnicholson4906 I suppose so, but when it’s a comparison between multiple different vehicles in a similar size category, it just seems off to me. Also, while hitting higher on the door would likely absorb more energy in an impact, wouldn’t it also increase the intrusion into the cabin, as opposed to essentially hitting the floorpan? Genuine question there
@@Poopsticle_256 Certainly could, but subaru doors act as steel cables when impacted. They have a peg that allows them to become under incredible tension to keep from coming to far into the cabin. The only reason they used the outback here is because it is nearly identical to the legacy, so ir doesn't make sense to use a legacy, and an outback for all of the crash test. Because keep in mind, this is just a few tests out of hundreds.
Tbh, I did not expect the Camry to be rated so low
I did, Noticed how the Hyundai had a better time? its all because Hyundai hired a huge bunch of the Toyota Engineers to help make their brand the premium brand it is now. There might be a day when someone asks you want planet you were born on if you think Toyota is reliable, that's not today but if they keep going down hill they will ruin their reputation and eventually a huge chunk of the market share as a lot of automotive manufactures are looking to regicide them from their throne
How? That's 1 of the worst new cars made.
Almost bought one 2023 camry hybrid. Thank god after watching this! No thanks!
Malibu is just pure death
it's because they're Lower Sedans, the Subaru is a bit higher off the ground so it gets hit different.
Yes the Subaru has a greater ground clearance which means the rocket panel is higher and more leveled with the crash bar of a t-bond vehicle. So it provides a greater resistance. And Subaru does not position Outback as a full size sedan.
Yeah it’s a station wagon. I guess they chose the outback instead of the Legacy because the Outback is more popular, and there are pretty much no other affordable Wagons sold in the US so it makes a more interesting watch.
The greater ground clearance on the Subaru Crosstrek did not help its ratings, it received a poor.
The Chevy Malibu Crash was particularly shocking. Think twice about choosing it as your next rental.
The latest crash test regulations have been upgraded. The Malibu platform stays in 2015. It is an older version than other cars. However, when looking at actual accident cases, Malibu drivers say that they are all fine and that Malibu is strong. You can't judge a car just by looking at the iihs video. And Korean cars are for both domestic and for export use, and the external use is manufactured to pass the test in accordance with safety regulations.
And I jus bought a 2021 Malibu 2 months ago 🤷🏽♀️😂
I can attest to this. I was recently in a pretty bad accident in my 2019 Malibu and only walked away with a few bruises
That Subaru should be in a separate video with wagons and SUVs. But we do see that a slightly lift vehicle may do better at this test because more of the frame is in the way. One I am interested to see and may do better is the new Toyota Crown. The lifted sedan may score just as well as the Subaru. Just saying. Even if these sedans aren't doing so well with this new test, personally I'd still get one over a crossover or an SUV due to fuel efficiency, simplicity, practicality, and space (as in, I don't take up space)
And same to Jetta, it has shorter wheel base, so it should be a lil bit stronger in side hit
The slightly lifted Crosstrek did not do better and got a poor rating.
This is an unfortunate direction that cars are heading. Because of safety and love of SUVs/Trucks, vehicles on the road are getting heavier than 15 years ago. The leads to the National Highway authority to adjust the crash test to suit today's real-life-scenario. In respond, automakers will have to make their cars stronger and thus heavier which leads to ever heavier cars into the future. Then the IIHS will change the crash rules to be even more stringent. This cycle will continue to make vehicles heavier on the road.
@@adhirsh_ I suppose when battery tech improves and can be lighter then we could see cars losing weight again. automaker would love to reduce weight as that will reduce cost.
Cars like EV weight more than 2 tons and go 0to60 in 3 seconds in SUV.
@@adhirsh_ I prefer low cars because they handle corners better.
The IIHS has always slander to the Camry.
And this VDO is trying to encourage you to buy the SUVs.
Yup. Wanna guess how much a Hummer EV weighs?
Well over 9000lbs as weighed and tested by some reviewers and magazines
@@adhirsh_ just walk
good job for subaru team, but i would like to see mazda, kia and volvo
Ooh I expect great results from Volvo
@@mravocadoman2904 me too, but i would like to see too
@@mravocadoman2904 I hope so too but the xc40 got an acceptable rating for updated side impact.
Mazda discontinued its mid sized sedan… you saw the Kia’s results… the K5 is a mechanical clone to the Sonata… and the Volvo is a luxury car.
@@CarlosJFM96 the Mazda is winner
Don’t understand the Subaru isn’t a sedan, & it’s higher off the ground. Can’t compare with sedans or same class.
I think Sonata is the winner .🤔 subaru is suv not sedan .😁
I think so too. Subaru is crossover SUV
У соната даже руль сломался 👎Волксваген топ!
Subaru is a STATION WAGON, not an SUV
Subaru is a glorified AWD station wagon, they get away with SUV/ CUV because of slightly lifted suspension.
whatever you wanna call the Subaru, fine. I call it absolutely hideous.
Jetta being C-class performed better than most of D-class cars
price performance car
Why outback and not legacy?
Everyone including the Iihs forgot it existed
The outback is essentially just a wagon legacy
@@ashercinemayt All that means is it's slightly lifted. It still looks like a wagon instead of a traditional SUV like a Forester or Accent
@AsherCinemaYT
The Legacy is a midsize sedan. Every other car tested here is a midsize sedan.
THANK YOU!
😢I just had car accident crashed by BMW X6 by side. My 2016 mini Cooper clubman has way more better than any one of those vehicles in the video. My mini was hit and slipped all most 2-3 meter. But My windows still well, only huge dent on driver side , and both front and left side airbags came out. My mini were diagnosed totally loss. Sad for this. I drove it more than 7 years. So So love my mini Cooper, mini as strong as a tank ❤❤thx !
Increasing side safety of cars creates other safety problems because of thickening of pillars. Increased weight leads to worse fuel consumption, already degraded because of emissions controls. Instead, decreasing the threat of modern supersized pickup trucks and SUVs through tax/lincensing or simply enforcing the existing laws against illegal truck modifications would be a better strategy.
I’ve noticed the thicker pillars make it harder to see crossing pedestrians when I’m turning.
@@Sashazur Tried driving a hyundai elantra and the thing has thicker pillars on the sides of the windshield than most 2000’s cars, and the thing is a mid-sized sedan
What a destruction
The intro has a lovely cadence
holy crap, 37mph is not that fast and it does that much damage. 50mph pretty a goner
what is the black one without window, that seems solid, it hit 6 car and still work well
Hyundai Sonata is one of the most underrated car in the world I don't know why I am driving Sonata since 2019 and I am so so satisfied and happy with sonata 😊
for some reason I find it funny that the ramming vehicle has American racing wheels
Mashina olishda eng muhum jihat bu kuzuf tayota camry men oylagandek natija ko'rsata olmagandan afsusdaman videorolik uchun rahmat foydali video bo'ldi xamma uchun❤
Rankings in my opinion:
1. Subaru (as expected from being a bigger vehicle)
2. VW (German engineering showed to provide more structural integrity to the car)
3. Toyota (lack of structural integrity has accommodated for more damage, but the crash test here shows the dummies could easily walk away)
4. Honda (exterior did not take as much damage, but the dummies were more vulnerable due to less structural integrity to the frame)
5. Hyundai (quite the opposite as the Honda, but is likely the dummies could walk away from the accident, but body, frame, and interior damage make this unlikely)
6. Chevy (extensive body, frame, and interior damage)
7. Nissan (extensive body, frame, and interior damage, and the dummies were a lot more vulnerable due to lack of structural integrity)
Even tho Jetta was smaller than a lot of the competitors and isn’t even in the same category as most of the competitors it did better than most
Definitely. hope Passat would perform better
Malibu is literally a moving coffin.
I prefer low cars because they handle corners better.
The IIHS has always slander to the Camry.
And this VDO is trying to encourage you to buy the SUVs.
The Camry has rear passenger airbags and the structure didn't collapse much. How can it be poor?
Yeah, I always thought that IIHS don't like camry... look at the accord, much different scores
It’s fitting that the crash tester has mustang wheels
💀💀💀
Визуально sonata winner, особенно подушка сиденья заднего пассажира отработала отлично
Это потому что утя соната
I thought the Jetta was considered a compact 🤔
It is and out performed them
Volkswagen 🔥🔥
Yeah, since jetta moved to MQB I assume this also applies to my mk7 GTI. The German stuff is great for safety.
Subaru legacy also got a good rating in later testing. Outback and legacy have the exact same platform so it makes sense they performed in the same way
The Subaru outback is not a midsize sedan. It’s a crossover you should’ve done the legacy. 8:04
Waiting for the Accord, Sonata and Malibu to come with AWD soon. (Since Camry, Outback and Altima already have them)
I don’t think accords will ever switch to awd and definitely not rwd
@SwiftRaven they will since Toyota do it. Why would they let their competitors gained all the AWD customer's and sit there and do nothing
So glad to own a Subaru.
doing crash tests sounds like a really fun job
Yep bro i wish i also get a job of something like that imagine how relaxing it is
Until you realize the car that did bad is the same make and model of your own car.
Одного не понял - зачем на телеге тормозные диски и суппорта, если она не планирует тормозить :)))
Может для других экспериментах используют
я главного не понял. кто победил то?
@@bennyurquidez6916 субик, однозначно
قزاز البنوراما في السوناتا ما تكسر 😐
IDK that the Camry did any worse than say the Civic. And the Subaru is in a totally different class. So basically all the cars tested here were Acceptable at best, and half fell into the poor category. I think they should rethink their testing strategy (or rather their round-up and how they score). This also sounds like it's some "independent" testing lab, not one like the NHTSA which does their own testing and has their own scoring (although maybe somewhat similar) and the one that most people go by. The issue with these tests is there can be variables that are not accounted for (such as the exact size and weight of the simulated vehicle that hits the car).
Просто у Субару большая часть удара приходится на порог, потому что он выше, а у седанах порог не задействован.
Bruh ain’t no way that Honda didn’t get a poor rating 💀 head and knee
Malibu 👍
Ха Узбек рулга каренг кийшайиб кетди
Соната браво 👏🏼
B필러 변형, 도어가 스티어링휠과 컬럼을 닿아 밀려오는정도로 차체 변형은 malibu, sonata가 가장 많은것 같습니다.
best of hyundai
???....
Hyundai = Hospital 😂
@@SuperTrumpMAGA
⛑️
"This SUV Im comparing to sedans did better than the sedans when hit by a pick-up truck analog"
Yeah, no shit. Someone got paid by Subaru.
These tests are somewhat deceptive. The battering ram that is suppose to be a car going at 35 mph does not have energy absorbent crumple zones or bumper. Just some solid material. If they wanted more credibility they would have used other cars to hit the parked test car.
The cart with moving barrier has best safety. )
Because Subaru is higher, there's a video about suv crash test with higher car.
6:10 Why did the brake light come on?
How come they don’t do tests where they allow a car to hit another car? That’s real life situations, I had a 2007 Toyota Camry and it held up really well. It was the special edition
Malibu🔥😱
I love the crash sound
Sonata and Malibu cars famous the Uzbekistan. Uzbekistan is great and historical country!
Outback is winner
Honda Accord ad:
“This car is very safe”
Got marginal on side crash test
All these tests are unrealistic. People continue to die in crashes no matter what vehicle they drive, real crashes are a totally different thing, conditions vary, speed, road conditions, traffic, drivers reactions, drivers reflexes, drivers experience to dangerous situations, so no matter what I continue to buy Toyota, like other people trust others car manufacturers and we’re not thinking about these crash tests, because they are simply STUPID. Truck drivers get killed in a vehicle that may weigh 80,000 pounds and a deer comes across in front of the rig , and driver reacts poorly and flips the truck over, different that being t-boned but it’s in example that nobody is safe on the road where machines and operators interact with each other. Commit yourself to the Lord every day for he appoints the day we DIE, regardless of you driving a Subaru.
Я полностью согласень с вами.
I wanna see volvo side crash
Camry 👍
Тип субару по безопасности лучше всех я так понял
Залізо «найкраще» мають. Досвід людини, яка займалася кузовним ремонтом авто. Також не знав
Не совсем, субару в этот тест не вписывается, это машина с высоким клиренсом, основной удар пришёлся в порог, самую сильную часть авто, соответственно такого сильного удара по стойке не было.
Джета также сюда не подходит, здесь должен быть Пассат вместо неё, Джета меньше сравниваемых авто и можно заметить, как удар пришёлся на заднюю стойку автомобиля.
What is the save SUV or vehicle?
2022 Hyundai or sudaru >>>>>>other japan car
For safety
@footballcoreano don't try say wrong fact. A lot toyota went over 1 milion miles. U just don't know
@footballcoreano Huh there are thousands of Toyota reaching 1Million miles, they just didn't make a video with it
@footballcoreano loll look up engines blowing up for hyundai. There is a reason the company is projecting $2 billion loss on warranty payments.
@footballcoreano what u smoking bro
This test wasn’t reliable at all. The Subaru Outback is a crossover not a sedan, and all the sedans were in different trim level. There should be fairness in those aspects.
Especially the Malibu but the Camry said it was good for the 2017
It's really disappointing to see that, the Toyota Camry overall side rating is poor... Hope that they built strong quality cars like in the past....
You would rather be in that Camry than let’s say another Camry from the late 2000s and earlier
The 2023 version gets a good rating as long as it was manufactured after Jan 2023. They responded quickly
This is probably this best job
I’m gonna hopefully work here one day
Почему не Пассат а жетта? Почему субару внедорожник а не седан?? Все автомобили должны были в одной линейки, это будет чётко и справедливо
The IIHS is a American owned company and Volkswagen doesn’t sell the Passat in the United States anymore.
@@LG_smart_fridge I'm not speak English 😬
@@Невыесняй-л3л IIHS - это американская компания, и Volkswagen больше не продает Passat в Соединенных Штатах.
@@LG_smart_fridge почему среди седанов субару внедорожник??? 🤔
@@Невыесняй-л3л
Subaru Outback - универсал, созданный на базе Subaru Legacy. Однако Subaru Outback предназначен для бездорожья, поэтому у него более высокий дорожный просвет. Однако это не внедорожник, хотя и может так выглядеть.
Hate to say it but the test have the impact zone set way too low. just take a look at those new suv, the top of hood is taller than the whole sedan. Test result changes dramatically with different impact zone.
I believe thats kinda the point
Well done Hyundai 👏
Camry!👍
Malibuni ko'rganlar bormi❤
Subaru is not sedan and also Jetta is not midsize . It must be Passat
So Subaru won the test because is taller, and not being well made
If the crash car is taller, it will just do the same.
Same, I want to work here
It’s not a justly test because Subaru was a suv and other brands were sedans
Of course body type is important to safety rate
The malibu crash test is the worst one i've seen yet.the barrier ate that.
Ate that? Ay yo brah
I've always thought... if the vehicle gets a poor rating, then that manufacturer shouldn't be able to sell that car until it gets a better rating. This is consumer safety we're talking about.
The Malibu also had a sunroof.
😂😂 I like how the dummies fall off the
car's
You guys realize an outback is not a mid size car? It would be the legacy. Thank you
The Subaru Outback is believe it or not is built on the same platform as the Subaru Legacy. The only reason why the Outback did better than the Legacy is because It sits a little higher up than its sedan twin, and because of that there was a little less intrusion into the occupant compartment.
Jetta is the winner!!! Subaru doesn’t count it’s taller)))
Nissan Altima did great gob for back passenger
스바루는 차체가 높아서 밑에 까지 박고 다른건 다 세단이라 밑에 충격 흡수가 안된거잔어 그나저나 소나타 의외네
그래봤자 판매율 ㅈ망
And the Honda dealer is asking $3000 over. Lol
My Auntie Has A Sonata And I Love It
thank you for your work
Wich better??
Who provides the car ?
I don't understand what is the reference point?
Thank god I got a Subaru
Looks like no vehicle is safe with all these oversized tanks on the road.
Жигули💪
They should people in the cars to make the tests more accurate.
TOYOTA CAMRY...100% 👍
Camry had great safety 👏👍
Agree
Same
are you blind? watch carefully 😆😂
@@gameislife4777 no u
@@gameislife4777 it has a pretty good structure but there injury measures were really high for some reason thus the poor rating
You made the insurance on my new 2022 Malibu go up is what you did 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬
Лучший результат я думаю у сонаты и алтимы
I just got hit by a SUV Nissan 2016 when I was driving my Toyota Camry 2017 XLE Hybrid, all her airbags got deployed and my not I want to know she got a total lost and now I only wants to know is was a fail of airbags or the car need a worst impact.
I want to understand something... Your movable barrier 🚧 has a shape.. this shape has no relation with a car a van or a truck
Damn American standard labeled Camry as midsize 😭
Yeah. Definitely not a large car by our standards.
That's according to government agencies. Talking to people on the street, you'll hear people call Altimas/Accords/Camrys as "small" cars, even by small (5'8" 140 lbs) guys.
Условия теста не сответствует реальности-асфальт не гладкий как в этой среде авто может перевернуть.
Ждём тогда от вас краш тестов. Только можно в открытих участках
matiz spark nexia 3 test drive ?? gentra. qip korila amiyam chiqp ketsa kere.
Malibu uchun kirganlar bitta like
Crying that im trying so hard and working yet I can’t afford a Camry , my dream car . Now im watching a video of someone destroying it . What an unfair world
It's a crash test
@@Saul_Soto82
it’s a real car as well
@@rawandjamal8499 Would you like buying a car without knowing if it's safe or not?
@@Saul_Soto82
Camry dose not need a test it has proven itself long time ago