Those Tomb Raider reboots were really good. I think a legitimate crossover would be really cool. Ghosts are already actively messing with local warlord A when Lara comes into the country chasing a treasure. The Ghosts and Lara both agree that the bad guy getting it is bad. The Ghosts think he will sell it to fund more nefarious nonsense so they're happy to help her beat them to it.
And TR fans thought they got it rough, with how wet-sockish Lara Croft looks (and behaves) in later games. BP's roster of horrifyingly inbred-looking character faces and vaguely sexually dimorphic bipedal shapes, sure give that, or indeed any game a run for their money, when it comes to the "progressive" warping the human form. Fury's original hairstyle (and Lara's here) with the braid was cut from the game, and quietly denied to us post-launch, even though we campaigned for months along with our "reconettes" to get it reinstated, only for modders to sort out, long after the fact, and for PC only, as per usual.
Excuse me, but the first sentence of this comment seems pretty weird. Please refrain from sexually explicit comments. If I have misunderstood, please let me know.
@@Digital_Zoey Don't know what's "sexually explicit" in calling the newest iteration of Lara Croft a "wet-sock", as in bland, uninteresting, as compared to the original character it is based on, both in looks and behaviour. As for the rest of the comment, I referred to the look of Breakpoint's character faces as "inbred" 'cause, frankly if you've ever looked at royal portraits across the centuries, that's the feeling you end up getting from these purposely ugly options you're presented with in that game. Same goes for the main character's model, specially the female alternative, hence why I call them "vaguely sexually dismorphic bipedal shapes". Again, nothing sexually explicit about it, besides the use of the term "sexually (dismorphic)" in a somewhat clinical sense. Hope it clarifies your concerns. Clever bit at the start of the video, by the way, cheers!
Very helpful video. Thanks Zoey!
I'm glad this helpful to you! Thanks!
thanks for the help! :D Nearly got killed by a drone ambush trying to get the last one but i managed
I'm glad this video was helpful!
Those Tomb Raider reboots were really good. I think a legitimate crossover would be really cool. Ghosts are already actively messing with local warlord A when Lara comes into the country chasing a treasure. The Ghosts and Lara both agree that the bad guy getting it is bad. The Ghosts think he will sell it to fund more nefarious nonsense so they're happy to help her beat them to it.
Yes, the Tomb Raider reboot series was fun. Thanks for the comment.
ขอบคุณครับ
thanks for watching
And TR fans thought they got it rough, with how wet-sockish Lara Croft looks (and behaves) in later games. BP's roster of horrifyingly inbred-looking character faces and vaguely sexually dimorphic bipedal shapes, sure give that, or indeed any game a run for their money, when it comes to the "progressive" warping the human form.
Fury's original hairstyle (and Lara's here) with the braid was cut from the game, and quietly denied to us post-launch, even though we campaigned for months along with our "reconettes" to get it reinstated, only for modders to sort out, long after the fact, and for PC only, as per usual.
Excuse me, but the first sentence of this comment seems pretty weird. Please refrain from sexually explicit comments. If I have misunderstood, please let me know.
@@Digital_Zoey Don't know what's "sexually explicit" in calling the newest iteration of Lara Croft a "wet-sock", as in bland, uninteresting, as compared to the original character it is based on, both in looks and behaviour. As for the rest of the comment, I referred to the look of Breakpoint's character faces as "inbred" 'cause, frankly if you've ever looked at royal portraits across the centuries, that's the feeling you end up getting from these purposely ugly options you're presented with in that game. Same goes for the main character's model, specially the female alternative, hence why I call them "vaguely sexually dismorphic bipedal shapes". Again, nothing sexually explicit about it, besides the use of the term "sexually (dismorphic)" in a somewhat clinical sense.
Hope it clarifies your concerns. Clever bit at the start of the video, by the way, cheers!
I see.(But to be honest, still it's a bit difficult to understand) Anyway, thank you for explaining it to me.