To everyone saying that it looks fake, it is... it is a bunch of still weather satilite images taken several minutes apart edited and smoothed to make a video. Most frames are not real just image averages.
Try to find some real photographs and film of satellites floating around in space. There should be thousands of hours of real film and thousands of real photographs of satellites floating around in space yet there are none.
It's the contrast to the parts that are fully sunlit that makes the inner parts of the penumbra (with only a partial eclipse) appear so dark, while human eyes will barely notice when, say, 75 % of the Sun is covered by the Moon.
@nehii. yea I get that part, but how is it so consistent. Sun trillions of miles away moon 100s of thousands miles. Chances of it perfectly passing to pass shadow on USA twice......
There is a YT video that explains this. There are 3 cycles that determine this. Moon's rotates around the Earth is one cycle. Moon's orbit is 5 degrees off earth's plane and there are 2 points of the orbits that intersect the same plane as Earth. Those 2 points also rotate. That is another cycle. Then there is also the Moon's orbit not being a circle but a slight ellipse. Perigee and Apogee, when the Moon is closest or farthest from Earth. Perigee and Apogee also rotate around it's orbit making a third cycle. So these 3 things have to line up perfectly for a solar eclipse to occur. There are mathematical formulas made to determine when and where Eclipses occur. The formulas are not perfect forever and have to be adjusted from time to time. That's why you see many charts up to a certain year. Hopefully this makes a little sense but that YT had a great visual of this titled "How Rare is the 2024 Eclipse?"
MrThriveAndSurvive Look how big the shadow is . You can see the shadow is starting to cover the east coast when the eclipse is over Montana , so that makes the moon bigger than 70 miles diameter .
The umbra is 70 miles wide, but the penumbra is much, much larger. Most of the penumbra is unnoticeable because only a small fraction of the sun is covered, but the bits of penumbra that encircle the umbra closely are dark enough that they seem to make the umbra appear larger than 70 miles wide due to the exposure settings used on this satellite's camera.
That right the penumbra is close 1,700 miles from the eclipse at Montana to the east cost and thats just the front half once its in the middle of the states the penumbra is over 3,000 miles diameter .
@@peterfallows6802 You're imagining the sun as a laser. It's not a laser. It's wider than the moon and shines light in all directions. Most of this light interesects with other light.
@@notablediscomfort Don't waste your time, either: 1) He doesn't have the mental capacity to understand reason, or 2) He's profiting from promoting false-logic and won't back down anyway
Regarding the sun, try to find a working demonstration of a heat and light source heating and lighting a surface while the distance between that heat and light source and surface is left cold and dark. Try to find some evidence that light, and heat, can travel as far as they say they can (millions and millions and millions and millions of miles) and then, again, while leaving its path both cold and dark.
I've also NEVER seen any evidence of a whirling, twirling, hurling, hurtling, wibbling, wobbling, zipping, zooming, spinning and spiraling space ball, spherical "planet" earth and NEITHER HAS ANYONE ELSE.
@@THEGOSPEL07-71 My Father lives, for all who are bitter shall not believe. The star was called “Wormwood,”* and a third of all the water turned to wormwood. Many people died from this water, because it was made bitter.
@@boltsdluna dude why gotta pick that bible verse, AND PLANET X ISN'T REAL, THE MOON DID, and if you dont want to call it the moon, DONT SAY PLANET X, Its "Lunar"
Anyone who thinks this is real should see how the supposed globe looks based on NASA CGI and check year by year. It changes size and colour every decade. Look up Devon island Canada if you think we've been to Mars
Or you can learn how different cameras can take different images, and how various images are put together... cameras have different focal lengths, etc.
If the video streams with good quality you can see the clouds moving. Keep in mind that the eclipse shadow traveled across the continent between 1500 - 2400 MPH at different points along its path. Even with the time lapse video, any significant movement of the clouds would have required a storm unlike any ever seen on this planet. :)
A better question would be "how is the satelitte taking the pictures not moving?" I believe this is a reconstructed image and the clouds are just an approximation for show
bu t yet not one picture of the actual eclipse.....why would we want to see the ground when we know what a shadow looks like...wheres the eclipse NASA...what R U hiding....?
That shadow is where the eclipse is visible from. You can't see the eclipse if you're not in the shadow. If something can record the shadow from outside it, how do you suppose it would record the eclipse?
You wouldn't see the eclipse from this perspective looking at the sun, because you have to be within the shadow to see any part of the eclipse. Not to mention, these satellites are literally put up there to look at the Earth, because they're not up there to look for eclipses. lmao
What would be the point of doing that? If the satellite was inside the shadow and looked at the Sun/Moon, it would look pretty much like it did from the surface. But seeing the shadow itself surrounded by sunlit areas like we see here is _impossible_ from ground level.
You do realize that the shape of shadows can be different from the objects casting them, right? Here are some _elephants_ seen from above with a low sun in the morning or evening: i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/07/17/article-2694673-1FADCBAF00000578-519_964x492.jpg
You realize how satellites work, right? This is a visible satellite image, you know when the weather forecasters show you timelapse video of the clouds during their weather reports... they're using satellite footage like this.
GEOS-16 is a weather satellite in a geosynchronous orbit, which means it orbits at a distance of a bit over 22,000 miles above the Earth in order to orbit at the same rate as the Earth spins, which enables it to observe the same portion of the Earth at all times. A weather satellite orbits this way to keep track of weather patterns on a specific portion of the Earth - in this case, North America. A weather satellite wouldn't be much use if every picture it took showed a different portion of the Earth. A little research is all it takes to learn the facts.
Okay, if I gave you the brightest flashlight in the world and had you stand about 150 metres away and shined it towards 2 balls, 1 a big ass beach ball and the other a tennis ball. Let's say that I went to simulate an eclipse with the tennis ball to the beach ball. The tennis ball would be a bit distorted because you're putting a round shadow onto a round object.
This is the 2017 eclipse, not this year’s
Obviously.
@joshuanissen8803 Obviously.
@@BluefireguyXDThis was the last eclipse, please say obviously 🙏
@@EvilYard Obviously not.
@@BluefireguyXD Last eclipse was 2017, Obviously...
thought this was the april 8 one, expecting the shadow to come from mexico but damn bro got me realizing when you started on oregon
Considering the video was posted August 21. 2017, it would be hard to think it was the eclipse from earlier this month.
To everyone saying that it looks fake, it is... it is a bunch of still weather satilite images taken several minutes apart edited and smoothed to make a video. Most frames are not real just image averages.
You are so gullible
Look-up "What is the difference between an image and a photograph?".
@@TheRealNewWhirledOrder photograph is someone who took a picture an image is something someone produced from cgi
@@Coach_cesar 👍
Try to find some real photographs and film of satellites floating around in space. There should be thousands of hours of real film and thousands of real photographs of satellites floating around in space yet there are none.
2017 eclipse?
hence why it was uploaded in 2017
its a 6 year old video
This video is 6 years old. It is not showing the eclipse of 2024 that's why the direction is different not that it is fake.
Looks fuzzier than Id expect
what I found more interesting is how clouds formed de-novo around the texan coastal area
It's crazy how all that is dark but only a small portion of it is actually true darkness
It's the contrast to the parts that are fully sunlit that makes the inner parts of the penumbra (with only a partial eclipse) appear so dark, while human eyes will barely notice when, say, 75 % of the Sun is covered by the Moon.
Why does the shadow change directions each eclipse?
Because of the angle at which the earth is facing the sun.
@nehii. yea I get that part, but how is it so consistent. Sun trillions of miles away moon 100s of thousands miles. Chances of it perfectly passing to pass shadow on USA twice......
@nehii. genuine question too.
Then search it. Dont ask random people on the internet, read a paper or something @@thegoat3109
There is a YT video that explains this. There are 3 cycles that determine this. Moon's rotates around the Earth is one cycle. Moon's orbit is 5 degrees off earth's plane and there are 2 points of the orbits that intersect the same plane as Earth. Those 2 points also rotate. That is another cycle. Then there is also the Moon's orbit not being a circle but a slight ellipse. Perigee and Apogee, when the Moon is closest or farthest from Earth. Perigee and Apogee also rotate around it's orbit making a third cycle. So these 3 things have to line up perfectly for a solar eclipse to occur. There are mathematical formulas made to determine when and where Eclipses occur. The formulas are not perfect forever and have to be adjusted from time to time. That's why you see many charts up to a certain year. Hopefully this makes a little sense but that YT had a great visual of this titled "How Rare is the 2024 Eclipse?"
That was the 2017 eclipse.
this isn't just the shot from Rick and Morty with the giant homeless guy orbiting the earth? hmm
MrThriveAndSurvive Look how big the shadow is . You can see the shadow is starting to cover the east coast when the eclipse is over Montana , so that makes the moon bigger than 70 miles diameter .
He's a con man.
My shadow was bigger than me, does mean I'm also 12 feet tall as well bc that makes me the tallest man in the world if thats the case 😅
Gorgeous video.
After 60 yrs of eclipses I quit caring🤦♂️
Whats the pseudo-RGB method for this? It doesn't look like yalls Natural True Color method, and that water is way off from geocolor.
Thought the shadow was 70 miles wide....
The umbra is 70 miles wide, but the penumbra is much, much larger. Most of the penumbra is unnoticeable because only a small fraction of the sun is covered, but the bits of penumbra that encircle the umbra closely are dark enough that they seem to make the umbra appear larger than 70 miles wide due to the exposure settings used on this satellite's camera.
That right the penumbra is close 1,700 miles from the eclipse at Montana to the east cost and thats just the front half once its in the middle of the states the penumbra is over 3,000 miles diameter .
@@Sertao2013 - have a honest go at proving to yourself that ‘ globe earth is nothing more than a model -
@@peterfallows6802 You're imagining the sun as a laser. It's not a laser. It's wider than the moon and shines light in all directions. Most of this light interesects with other light.
@@notablediscomfort Don't waste your time, either:
1) He doesn't have the mental capacity to understand reason, or
2) He's profiting from promoting false-logic and won't back down anyway
Regarding the sun, try to find a working demonstration of a heat and light source heating and lighting a surface while the distance between that heat and light source and surface is left cold and dark.
Try to find some evidence that light, and heat, can travel as far as they say they can (millions and millions and millions and millions of miles) and then, again, while leaving its path both cold and dark.
Huh?
@@BobM925 I've never seen any evidence that the sun is, exactly, what we've been told it is or that it's as far away as they say it is.
I've also NEVER seen any evidence of a whirling, twirling, hurling, hurtling, wibbling, wobbling, zipping, zooming, spinning and spiraling space ball, spherical "planet" earth and NEITHER HAS ANYONE ELSE.
@@TheRealNewWhirledOrderI have seen that
@@anothergenericname9438 "I have seen that"
What is it?
2017
it's so cool XD
GEOSTATIONARY ORBIT!!!!!
You know it’s real because of how fake it looks. - Elon Musk
And yet it’s real.
@@kitcanyon658 now I know you’re a paid troll. Following me from thread to thread, what scum
Hola y por Sudamérica no se ve como pasa el eclipse
The pathway of the moons shadow is way off.In the video the shadow barely touches Ohio.But we had beautiful,glorious totality in Akron,Ohio.
This video is from 2017
This was the one from 2017, not earlier this month.
this video was from the eclipse in 2017, not 2024
Planet X over U.S
i dont think the moon is even a planet
@@robertgough161
So he thinks rasta 🙃
@@boltsdlunaPlanet X doesn't exist just like your parents
@@THEGOSPEL07-71
My Father lives, for all who are bitter shall not believe.
The star was called “Wormwood,”* and a third of all the water turned to wormwood. Many people died from this water, because it was made bitter.
@@boltsdluna dude why gotta pick that bible verse, AND PLANET X ISN'T REAL, THE MOON DID, and if you dont want to call it the moon, DONT SAY PLANET X, Its "Lunar"
Looks a little fake to me
It’s real I was there
Most of this stuff is
@@Chollanger148-pv8jpshut up bot
And why do you think that?
Oh that your birth had been faked 😅
So it is not real?
no it is real wym
Fym not real 😂
@@nehii.dude its the 2017 eclipse not the 2024 eclipse
Lol. Right
yes this is indeed right
Looks like cgi
Looks like you forgot to take your schizophrenia medication.
Anyone who thinks this is real should see how the supposed globe looks based on NASA CGI and check year by year.
It changes size and colour every decade.
Look up Devon island Canada if you think we've been to Mars
Or you can learn how different cameras can take different images, and how various images are put together... cameras have different focal lengths, etc.
Yeah Australia just becomes half the size of earth when I use my 50mm. Ok fren
Zooming in is _not_ the same as moving closer!
@Chollanger148-pv8jp You mean the continent the size of Africa that is over twice as wide as it is tall?
Oh wow, hey I have forests with pine trees nearby. Canada is so fake bro.
FAKEEEEEEE
your fake
@@robertgough161 You're
@@steriopticon2687 my bad but now you mentioned it he also made a spelling error
fake has only 1 e not 7
@@robertgough161People like to add extra letters to words cause they think it makes them yell.
how is this fake, this is the 2017 eclipse btw and not the 2024 one
Mmm q no entró x Manzanillo y salió x el Este d Canadá.
En la imágen s vio un poco diferente...😬😅
Video subido hace 6 años
Why are the clouds not moving if that was a span of several hours
They are... plus these are large distances
You need a good connection to see them move..
If the video streams with good quality you can see the clouds moving. Keep in mind that the eclipse shadow traveled across the continent between 1500 - 2400 MPH at different points along its path. Even with the time lapse video, any significant movement of the clouds would have required a storm unlike any ever seen on this planet. :)
Huhh?? If you can't see the clouds moving at 0:07 you should seriously consider an eye test.
A better question would be "how is the satelitte taking the pictures not moving?" I believe this is a reconstructed image and the clouds are just an approximation for show
bu t yet not one picture of the actual eclipse.....why would we want to see the ground when we know what a shadow looks like...wheres the eclipse NASA...what R U hiding....?
That shadow is where the eclipse is visible from.
You can't see the eclipse if you're not in the shadow. If something can record the shadow from outside it, how do you suppose it would record the eclipse?
You wouldn't see the eclipse from this perspective looking at the sun, because you have to be within the shadow to see any part of the eclipse. Not to mention, these satellites are literally put up there to look at the Earth, because they're not up there to look for eclipses. lmao
What would be the point of doing that?
If the satellite was inside the shadow and looked at the Sun/Moon, it would look pretty much like it did from the surface. But seeing the shadow itself surrounded by sunlit areas like we see here is _impossible_ from ground level.
There's SOOO many pictures of the actual eclipse.
It doesn't look like happening because of the moon that was not the shape of the moon
Yes it was I was there
What IS the shape of the moon, in your opinion?
@@Voidi-Void it’s the shape of my scrotum 😂
You do realize that the shape of shadows can be different from the objects casting them, right? Here are some _elephants_ seen from above with a low sun in the morning or evening:
i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/07/17/article-2694673-1FADCBAF00000578-519_964x492.jpg
The shape of the moon is a sphere, this is the kind of shadow a sphere produces.
Obviously fake. This shows the path NW to SE but this track was SW to NE up from Texas thru Ohio and Indiana.
This video was about the 2017 eclipse...
it was about the 2017 eclipse, do your research
this was the 2017 eclipse. Not 2024
That all CGI
All the CGI that millions saw?
@@jshooa4840 oh I didn't realize millions saw this CGI image or from so called "space"... I saw the eclipse from my own eyes above me.
@@GREEKKINGG "So called space" you do realise how crazy you sound
You realize how satellites work, right? This is a visible satellite image, you know when the weather forecasters show you timelapse video of the clouds during their weather reports... they're using satellite footage like this.
bro your CGI
Little weird that the satellite didn't move at all. Probably fake
that is true
GEOS-16 is a weather satellite in a geosynchronous orbit, which means it orbits at a distance of a bit over 22,000 miles above the Earth in order to orbit at the same rate as the Earth spins, which enables it to observe the same portion of the Earth at all times. A weather satellite orbits this way to keep track of weather patterns on a specific portion of the Earth - in this case, North America. A weather satellite wouldn't be much use if every picture it took showed a different portion of the Earth.
A little research is all it takes to learn the facts.
It doesn't look like happening because of the moon that was not the shape of the moon
Its the projection of a sphere onto a curved surface (the Earth) seen from the eastern side.
Comment makes no sense
Wtf are you talking about? The moon is and always has been round....
@@cheeko_914 Project a shadow of a sphere at an angle onto a curved surface (the Earth) and the resulting viewed shape is anything but round.
Okay, if I gave you the brightest flashlight in the world and had you stand about 150 metres away and shined it towards 2 balls, 1 a big ass beach ball and the other a tennis ball. Let's say that I went to simulate an eclipse with the tennis ball to the beach ball. The tennis ball would be a bit distorted because you're putting a round shadow onto a round object.