I’ve never understood this thing about needing timeouts specifically for tv. You have regular timeouts, between quarter breaks, injuries, halftime, in the case of NFL and College starting this year 2:00 Warning, pregame, postgame……..you have a shit ton of opportunities to put in advertisements, there should be zero reason you need to add to the runtime of the game specifically because you need ad space. It’s ridiculous. Here’s a though, not at the time but in the modern day, there’s this thing called picture in picture, shouldn’t be that hard to either put an ad in the corner during a play or two OR split the screen, keep the game going and show ads. There’s plenty of solutions to make sure the game doesn’t take all friggin day and you get your ads in.
Even with less tech there were solutions. But the thing is football accepted that without batting an eye. If the leagues stomped their feet and said no this wouldn't be the norm. You don't see other sports and most forms of racing accepting this. When they say US sports leagues are infomercials with a game in between they are probably right
It doesn't make much sense for them to play each other. His other video about the '86 game explains why they faced each other. New Mexico was trying to upgrade its program in the 1980s and got UT to agree to a home-and-home contingent on New Mexico expanding its football stadium. But the AD couldn't get the funding for it and the '86 game ended up being played in Knoxville, too. Tennessee has played UTEP, UNLV and North Texas since then, so they will schedule teams from that region.
As someone who saw a lot of football when there were a lot of untelivised games, I used to hate going to televised games. My local college team in those days did nothing during these breaks. No music, no announcements and the band didn't even play. So everyone sat there and stared at the teams standing around for an entire commercial break. Now, they do all kinds of things to distract and entertain the fans. It was weird.
I thought until the 1994 World Cup the USA broadcasts of soccer always had commercials while the game was going on . This included coverage of the NASL in the 1970s
As a soccer fan that was true to a certain extent especially when it came to the NASL. However the first time that a soccer match was shown without commercials in the US was actually at the 1986 World Cup when ESPN was told by FIFA not to show commercials which they complied with. This resulted in 10-12 minute commercial breaks (with only 3 minutes of highlights/analysis) during halftime as a way of ESPN trying to regain some of money lost from not showing commercials during the game. However at this same World Cup, FIFA was totally okay with NBC (who also had the rights) sticking commercials in the middle of the game. This caused outrage especially during the famous quarterfinal between England & Argentina where NBC inexplicably went to commercial break as Diego Maradona was making the run that would lead to "The Goal of the Century". This kind of controversy will likely never happen again as FIFA only gives both the English & Spanish language rights to one US broadcaster each & has introduced things like the hydration break so that commercials could be aired if a broadcaster wanted to.
@@chipparmley Blame the NCAA. Until June 1984 they controlled the TV rights to Football games... and the only reason they lost the rights is that the US Supreme Court ruled that was overstepping the NCAA bounds, and gave the Schools/Conferences the TV rights.
It was there in 1964-67 and then brought back in 1989, six years after the game in the video. Doug Dickey was the Tennessee coach who introduced it, but when the Vols went to a turf field in 1968, they couldn't accommodate the checkerboard end zone. He returned to UT as the AD in the 1980s after coaching at Florida for several years, and by then you could have a colored end zone on your turf, so he brought it back. A few years after that, Tennessee got rid of the turf.
@@johncate9541 I noticed that when teams started putting in the fieldturf. It was no color in the back of the endzones or colored cause when the bills redid their field the old field has red backing but for a while after the new field was put in it was plain green.
Thank goodness broadcasts such as this fiasco wouldn't occur today based on how modern media deals work. I never even knew about that rule that the SEC had.
Is it possible that you can make a video about the controversial suspension of MASN Broadcaster Kevin Brown that took place late July-early August on your JaguarGator7 channel?
You’d think maybe they could run ads on a chyron similar to storm warnings. Give the sponsors a break on the price since the ads won’t be visual. Or, if the makeshift crew did ads like those during baseball games, it would not be so bad.
After denying the use of TV timeouts, I think Tennessee was expecting KOB to do a taped-delayed broadcast, as Live regional broadcasts were still uncommon in 1983. On tape delay, it easier to insert commercials as needed.
This is very similar to what happened in the UK with Sky Sports first ever broadcast in 1996 of the World Series between the Braves & Yankees. For some context, the 1996 World Series was the first time ever that the World Series & baseball in general was shown live in the UK as previously the only way baseball fans in the UK could watch/follow the Fall Classic & baseball in general was through importing VHS's from the US on the sport or through brief mentions of it on the BBC's sports program Grandstand. However instead of taking commercial breaks in between innings, in between the top & bottom of each inning & during pitching changes like what US broadcasters do, Sky decided to use the same approach that they had covering cricket where they took a commercial break every time there was a new batter with their World Series coverage & they went into this thinking that baseball & cricket are very similar sports. Naturally this resulted in a very disjointed broadcast as fans would miss the action because Sky would cut to commercial as soon as someone either stuck out, got out or got a hit. What makes this worse is that Sky used the feed provided by sister station Fox (this was back when both stations were owned by Rupert Murdoch) to broadcast the World Series. In essence Sky Sports basically butchered the Fox broadcast that was given to them. Sky also did this with Fox's NFL games along with NBC's & MNF on ABC as well that year where like in this story they took commercial breaks at the worst possible time. It wouldn't be until 2003 that Sky Sports stopped doing this because Fox threatened to stop giving them the feed from their MLB & NFL coverage if they continued.
Which is similar to when ESPN picked up the broadcast rights to Formula One in 2018 and tried to broadcast the 2018 Australian Grand Prix like they did when they had the broadcast rights for both NASCAR and Indycar (i.e: with a lot of commercials), but there was a slight issue as ESPN was using the entire broadcast from Sky Sports F1, and Sky Sports F1 doesn't do ad breaks, so it created a disjointed broadcast and made all the American F1 fans angry and they caused so much of an uproar that ESPN has aired every F1 race from the 2018 Bahrain Grand Prix upto the present day ad free
I love the Lobos I really do but everytime I see news about them they're being blown out or have some kind of controversy. Good football comes out occasionally from them. 2015-2016 was triple option bliss for me but do highlights exists so we can remember those great games during that time...of course not, maybe 2 or 3 games you can still watch highlights on. I hope we get to see a video on the mike locksey era. 3-33 is record that traumatizes any lobo fan when brought up, heck the head coach only won 2 of those games.
I’ve never understood this thing about needing timeouts specifically for tv. You have regular timeouts, between quarter breaks, injuries, halftime, in the case of NFL and College starting this year 2:00 Warning, pregame, postgame……..you have a shit ton of opportunities to put in advertisements, there should be zero reason you need to add to the runtime of the game specifically because you need ad space. It’s ridiculous. Here’s a though, not at the time but in the modern day, there’s this thing called picture in picture, shouldn’t be that hard to either put an ad in the corner during a play or two OR split the screen, keep the game going and show ads. There’s plenty of solutions to make sure the game doesn’t take all friggin day and you get your ads in.
Even with less tech there were solutions.
But the thing is football accepted that without batting an eye. If the leagues stomped their feet and said no this wouldn't be the norm.
You don't see other sports and most forms of racing accepting this.
When they say US sports leagues are infomercials with a game in between they are probably right
8:35 - And KLB wanted to squeeze a commercial in.
'Inserts TH-cam Ad'
Nice
...and now we know why Tennessee will not Volunteer to play New Mexico.
It doesn't make much sense for them to play each other. His other video about the '86 game explains why they faced each other. New Mexico was trying to upgrade its program in the 1980s and got UT to agree to a home-and-home contingent on New Mexico expanding its football stadium. But the AD couldn't get the funding for it and the '86 game ended up being played in Knoxville, too.
Tennessee has played UTEP, UNLV and North Texas since then, so they will schedule teams from that region.
Boooooooooo!!
Mrmoose you need help HA HA HA HA HA
*throws rotten fruit*
Love you vids, JG9. All your videos are very well done.
As someone who saw a lot of football when there were a lot of untelivised games, I used to hate going to televised games. My local college team in those days did nothing during these breaks. No music, no announcements and the band didn't even play. So everyone sat there and stared at the teams standing around for an entire commercial break. Now, they do all kinds of things to distract and entertain the fans. It was weird.
As someone whose never gone to an untelevised game, I can only wonder at how nice it must have been to not have all these constant media breaks!
I'm so excited for a new video. It's been a while
I thought until the 1994 World Cup the USA broadcasts of soccer always had commercials while the game was going on . This included coverage of the NASL in the 1970s
As a soccer fan that was true to a certain extent especially when it came to the NASL. However the first time that a soccer match was shown without commercials in the US was actually at the 1986 World Cup when ESPN was told by FIFA not to show commercials which they complied with. This resulted in 10-12 minute commercial breaks (with only 3 minutes of highlights/analysis) during halftime as a way of ESPN trying to regain some of money lost from not showing commercials during the game. However at this same World Cup, FIFA was totally okay with NBC (who also had the rights) sticking commercials in the middle of the game. This caused outrage especially during the famous quarterfinal between England & Argentina where NBC inexplicably went to commercial break as Diego Maradona was making the run that would lead to "The Goal of the Century". This kind of controversy will likely never happen again as FIFA only gives both the English & Spanish language rights to one US broadcaster each & has introduced things like the hydration break so that commercials could be aired if a broadcaster wanted to.
@@chrisguardiano6143man, they went to commercial during that time?
Unacceptable
The WAC only had one bowl available in 1982 which went to BYU who beat New Mexico.
Here in New York City, there were no college football games on TV, none of them at all. The only way to catch a college football game is on the radio.
wow
@@chipparmley Blame the NCAA.
Until June 1984 they controlled the TV rights to Football games... and the only reason they lost the rights is that the US Supreme Court ruled that was overstepping the NCAA bounds, and gave the Schools/Conferences the TV rights.
it interesting to see tennessee field without the checkboard endzones we are so used to now seeing.
It was there in 1964-67 and then brought back in 1989, six years after the game in the video. Doug Dickey was the Tennessee coach who introduced it, but when the Vols went to a turf field in 1968, they couldn't accommodate the checkerboard end zone. He returned to UT as the AD in the 1980s after coaching at Florida for several years, and by then you could have a colored end zone on your turf, so he brought it back. A few years after that, Tennessee got rid of the turf.
@@johncate9541 I noticed that when teams started putting in the fieldturf. It was no color in the back of the endzones or colored cause when the bills redid their field the old field has red backing but for a while after the new field was put in it was plain green.
Was Calliou the director?
It's funny, I was a senior in high school in Albuquerque in 83 and always watched the Lobos but don't remember this trainwreck.
Thank goodness broadcasts such as this fiasco wouldn't occur today based on how modern media deals work. I never even knew about that rule that the SEC had.
Is it possible that you can make a video about the controversial suspension of MASN Broadcaster Kevin Brown that took place late July-early August on your JaguarGator7 channel?
You’d think maybe they could run ads on a chyron similar to storm warnings. Give the sponsors a break on the price since the ads won’t be visual. Or, if the makeshift crew did ads like those during baseball games, it would not be so bad.
After denying the use of TV timeouts, I think Tennessee was expecting KOB to do a taped-delayed broadcast, as Live regional broadcasts were still uncommon in 1983.
On tape delay, it easier to insert commercials as needed.
664 schools in NCAA Division I FBS, NCAA Division I FCS, Division II and III. 759 including NAIA, for football.
I am a simple man. I see a Lobo video and I press play
When’s the next video?
This is very similar to what happened in the UK with Sky Sports first ever broadcast in 1996 of the World Series between the Braves & Yankees. For some context, the 1996 World Series was the first time ever that the World Series & baseball in general was shown live in the UK as previously the only way baseball fans in the UK could watch/follow the Fall Classic & baseball in general was through importing VHS's from the US on the sport or through brief mentions of it on the BBC's sports program Grandstand. However instead of taking commercial breaks in between innings, in between the top & bottom of each inning & during pitching changes like what US broadcasters do, Sky decided to use the same approach that they had covering cricket where they took a commercial break every time there was a new batter with their World Series coverage & they went into this thinking that baseball & cricket are very similar sports. Naturally this resulted in a very disjointed broadcast as fans would miss the action because Sky would cut to commercial as soon as someone either stuck out, got out or got a hit. What makes this worse is that Sky used the feed provided by sister station Fox (this was back when both stations were owned by Rupert Murdoch) to broadcast the World Series. In essence Sky Sports basically butchered the Fox broadcast that was given to them. Sky also did this with Fox's NFL games along with NBC's & MNF on ABC as well that year where like in this story they took commercial breaks at the worst possible time. It wouldn't be until 2003 that Sky Sports stopped doing this because Fox threatened to stop giving them the feed from their MLB & NFL coverage if they continued.
And it was also the first 1996 World Series game where the New York Yankees were the World Champions.
Which is similar to when ESPN picked up the broadcast rights to Formula One in 2018 and tried to broadcast the 2018 Australian Grand Prix like they did when they had the broadcast rights for both NASCAR and Indycar (i.e: with a lot of commercials), but there was a slight issue as ESPN was using the entire broadcast from Sky Sports F1, and Sky Sports F1 doesn't do ad breaks, so it created a disjointed broadcast and made all the American F1 fans angry and they caused so much of an uproar that ESPN has aired every F1 race from the 2018 Bahrain Grand Prix upto the present day ad free
I would love to see more college football vids
I love the Lobos I really do but everytime I see news about them they're being blown out or have some kind of controversy. Good football comes out occasionally from them. 2015-2016 was triple option bliss for me but do highlights exists so we can remember those great games during that time...of course not, maybe 2 or 3 games you can still watch highlights on. I hope we get to see a video on the mike locksey era. 3-33 is record that traumatizes any lobo fan when brought up, heck the head coach only won 2 of those games.
What the hell did I just watch.
On the same day, unheralded Cincinnati -nowhere near the caliber it is today-stunned national champion Penn State 17-14.
Most things about lobos football are usually a disaster unfortunately
I hope JG8 covers the CSU-Colorado game. All time football terrorism by CSU coach Jay Norvell.