Show me a politician that ISN'T opportunistic! Hell, Harris called Biden a racist and yet jumped at the opportunity to be VP because it helped her end goal!
When did she call Biden racist? Literally the first thing I googled about this is a factcheck providing the statements and evidence showing that Trump (as usual) just made it up so guys like you can eat it up. It’s a lot easier for Reps to just make stuff up rather than talk policy
Exactly! Vance called Trump the greatest threat to America back in 2016 and now he coddles his balls. Power is all that matters at the end of the day to a politician.
Have you ever even read Project 2025? It's not a normal lib nor conservative think tank paper. They're the goals of the insane right who want to be rulers of us all, not governance with the consent of the people. Huge difference! I miss the old republicans who tried hard to get away from the insane right. Now, the nutjobs are running the asylum.
I watched Ezra with Pete Buttigeig the other day on NYTimes podcast. Ezra talked about Pete winning Iowa in 2020 - a boldface lie! Remember Pete and the app he paid for called Shadow Ap, by Acronym (a company owned by his roommates girlfriend) - Shadow Ap was paid for by Pete's and Biden's campaign to count the votes- total disaster. Pete later came on and claimed victory while the NBC host questioned why he did that, "Cause I felt like it" said Pete the Cheat. Bernie probably won it - they ruined the Iowa caucuses - we actually don't know who won it. Ezra didn't discuss Pete's cheating.
Everytime anyone like you yap screams Republicans with no morals. Undercover proj 2025. Especially comparing right to left. I'll say it again proj 2025. Smh!
The difference is that is widely speculated the jill biden is the one leading the white house. While trump did not have the excuse of not leading, he was leading and every decision was his. We would rather a woman with a Master of Education degree leading the country while her husband was a stand in then a man child who had the emotional spectrum of a teenage girl lead while he did the policies selected by his staff.
Carrying water for your boss ability to do a job isnt the same as pedaling the lies and all the bat shit crazy things Trump said and did during his entire term. It also isnt equivalent to undermine a fair election you lost for your boss. Republicans always try to make these false equalancy that just doesn't hold up. Trump literally attempted a coup
What is so hard to understand about this. Obama quite literally said that The Heritage Foundation was the ideological wellspring behind the Affordable Care Act ("Obamacare").
Pretty sure he took most of his “Playbook” from the Center for American Progress - which is also where nearly ALL the MSM gets their headlines and talking points from… hence the connection to Soros etc… Heritage is peanuts in comparison to influence
Of course, they cooked up a way to keep making money while pretending that they are doing something for the people. They are in the business of cooking up anything evil, and politicians on both sides have a great appetite for these projects, including Obama.
Exactly. But that was spin. Think tanks don't just think up stuff they like or want but do war game scenarios and think of things the other side might want to implement, which is what that was and it is unconstitutional but John Roberts was the SCOTUS swing vote and he made an overtly political move and unconstitutionally rewrote the mandate provision to rationalize his vote because the Republicans took control of Congress during that case so he couldn't send it back to the Democrats to rewrite. So he crapped on the constitution and abused his authority to pass Obamacare to, in his own words, prevent the court from looking political, because the Dems and media always cry SCOTUS decisions are political if they don't get their way and so the media and historians would like him and be nice to him. Coward. He should have been thrown off the court for that and he repeatedly proves to be problematic in his decisions. But the media and Dems act like he is some far right conservative which is ridiculous and they know it.
Why are we imagining a scenario where Vance is in Pence's shoes during January 6th? Trump will never campaign as a sitting president ever again. It is a non-issue due to term limits.
What if he wants Don Jr to be the next president. Gotta think far ahead. If you told people that Trump would stage a coup after losing, people would call you crazy. Yet Trump, Bannon, and his aides were already discussing countermeasures involving Trump declaring he won even before the votes were fully counted. They had been planning this for a long time
@@dave4148What!? You realize Vance and Trump are different people don’t you? That’s like saying Kamala could have a son that brings cocaine into the White House. It’s pretty obvious to imagine using your logic.
@@dave4148But Trump doesn’t have the power he had in 2020. I’m guessing you mean if Trump wins? If he loses he doesn’t have the power he did in 2020 as the POTUS.
"Trump could install people to help him if there's another January 6th" Except Trump won't be running for election again if he becomes president, so what are you talking about??
@@insanittiez4860if you think Trump will fight so much for anybody else, then u have been politically illiterate for the past 8yrs.. Trump ll care more abt preserving his legacy than helping out junior or jd vance
@@MichaelEdwards-gc2xx he will fight if it means him not going to jail. Plus that way, he will still be able to influence the Republican Party and basically serve as king maker. No one really cares about presidents after they leave. Trump will still want to stay relevant
And at what point did you ever think this was news to begin with? It never has been. It has been a show that reflects opinion of todays news from differing political spectrums. This is the danger. Counting something as news when it most certainly isn't. That includes Fox, MSNBC, CNN, etc.
Sort of feels like Emily changes depending on the surrounding. She’s reasonable here but then when Megyn Kelly is raging she sort of fed it. Wonder if she’ll be joining her tonight.
exactly this, she's a chameleon and can't really be trusted to be delivering honest takes. she most definitely changes her positions and attitudes based on who she's talking to.
Nah, Emily is fairly consistent everywhere except this show. Her conservatism has been neutered in this studio, just like Saagar's has. Krystal's opinions are the way it is, and if you wanna disagree with her then you'd better stay within the 3-4 well defined areas within which tepid disagreement is acceptable.
Like all conservatives , at this point if she tows the party in in rational settings she'll sound like a lunatic. "They eat dogs!" ...imagine actually saying that in public about people.
It should happen again and this time Trump should declare martial law. Send the military to build the border wall, then send them to clean up all the major crime ridden cities like Detroit and Chicago. This is what Nayib Bukele did in El Salvador. Encourage all able-bodied males to sign up for ICE to roundup and deport millions of illegals. Repeal the 19th Amendment. Then he should change the election rules to create an illiberal democracy like Orban, Erdogan, and Putin.
awww did BP hurt your feelings that you have to cry about it now? you're just helping drive up the view count on this topic so you can thank yourself for this segment
Genuinely enjoy the chemistry and conversations between Emily and Krystal. Always appreciate Saagar's perspective as well, but this is a fresh duo that would benefit from a regular rotation IMHO.
Great team for Trump's transition. Project 2025 was developed by the Heritage Foundation - the DNC grabbed it and are scaring the Dems into the voting both. Screw the Democrats, I'm leaving with RFK Jr.
I'm still checking in bc it's going to be a bit of comedy gold to see Krystal's face after the next Trump victory. There'll be a lot of cope in the comments too
If you only want a conservative bias like Emily, then there are hundreds of channels that pander to conservatives. We come here because we get to hear both sides. Stop crying! 😂
@@kaybrown7733 I just goes to show that some people aren't deep thinkers. The whole idea of the show is to have both sides. Some people are so into the cult that they lose the ability to think for themselves.
Trump did give a speech at an NRA meeting he could be considered a three-term president if he clinches a wins in November and with SCOTUS in his pocket and combine with his other slip if they vote for him this November, "in four years, you don't have to vote again. We'll have it fixed so good, you're not gonna have to vote." Trump himself is giving lots of people pause for voting for a potential dictator
Maybe because Vance could run and he said he would not have certified the election like Mike Pence did? 🤷🏻♂️ maybe because Trump said he deserved a right for a 3rd term? Maybe because it tells something about trump general character and what he might to in other situation? Maybe because he did not pay enough of a price for it and should not be “pardon” by winning a new term?
Love the motherly look on Krystal's face when she interacts with Emily and how psyched Emily gets to have these segments. You can tell there's mad respect between the two of them.
This was a stupid conversation that completely failed to grasp the motivations of the subjects, I would expect more from Emily, not so much from Krystal
Emily is a bit lacking in depth and breadth it seems. I’ve listened to many of her interviews. Once she’s outside of her own spaces, she struggles a bit. I give her credit for going out into other situations though. Her interview of Maryanne Williamson was a good one. I think Maryanne taught her quite a bit and Emily genuinely seemed to appreciate the conversation.
I'm gonna stop watching Breaking points, Ball is literally using BP to campaign for the democratic party these days, she's truly insufferable, I can't even imagine the things that her co host thinking behind her back, she's biased beyond reasoning on a show that is supposed to be in the middle of both parties, she really does think we're stoopid😅
Personally I don’t think this content is up to brand standards. The title Labeling is misleading towards the subject matter. The way in which the hosts made negative characterizations about the motives and intentions of a public figure without adequately supporting the characterization with objective facts is also problematic. Ultimately I feel this channel is capable of doing better than this and I look forward to seeing it grows and does better in the future. PS: If your hosts were willing to make the same claims directly to the man’s face. I’d be willing to show up for that. Would they be willing to say the same thing directly to the person they’re talking about?
One distinction seems pretty important here. Emily plausibly suggests that people like Vance, Deneen, and Vermeule might not think of the Constitution as a sacred text. That’s not the same thing as believing that the end justifies the means, per se. Serious Catholics believe in multiple moral absolutes. There’s no reason a serious Catholic would have to think provisions of the Constitution were or embodied these sorts of absolutes, but a serious Catholic might well think that, whatever the Constitution, there were all sorts of things it would be wrong to do under any circumstances.
The truth is literally written down in their Project 2025 book 😂 Trump can't outrun it & he's going to lose partly because of it. Unfortunately it doesn't end with Trump. Once he loses they'll put it on the next Republican nominee. Hopefully that helps them lose too.
Part of the issue is that true Conservatives seem to genuinely not understand leftist politics at all. In 2020 when Trump would accuse Biden of being part of the "radical left," I just assumed he was saying it performatively in a tongue-in-cheek kind of way. But as I've listened to more and more Conservative media over the past four years, there's no question that many of these people really genuinely DO think Biden and Harris are extremely far left (Marxist even). To those of us on the REAL progressive left, this type of rhetoric is always hilarious bc we all know that Biden and Harris are nothing more than center-right establishment neoliberals. Not only are they NOT radical leftists or Marxists, they're not even in the same solar system as the real progressive left.
It's all culture war now. When conservatives say marxist they're talking about transgenders in girls sports. When was the last time universal healthcare was even a major issue, 2016? Biden did anti-trust, if Trump is elected he will crack down on unionization. But nobody is going to care. New conservatives are calling for a Caesar to take power, to save America from groomers and immigrants. Funded by silicon valley billionaires like Peter Thiel, and Elon Musk who want lower taxes and to destroy "woke socialism".
Kamala was the most “progressive” member of Congress when she was a Senator. Left of Bernie Sanders. If you don’t think that’s left enough, you’re ignoring the data.
@@rdf4ta927 She talked a good game, but other than co-sponsoring a ceremonial universal health care bill that had no chance of passing, she actually didn't do much to advance the progressive agenda while in the Senate. And sure enough, now that she's a breath from the White House, her domestic agenda is nothing more than center-left & her foreign policy is center-right. Lots of centrist Dems like to claim they're progressive, but talk - action = shit.
I mean what did Obama do policy wise to help the economy other than fixing the recession hardship in the Midwest saving auto factories in 2009? Biden has the chips act, and inflation act.
This is breaking points, morphing into MSM😂 My favorite last line is from Animal Farm by George Orwell. “The creatures outside looked from pig to man, and from man to pig, and from pig to man again; but already it was impossible to say which was which.”
This was by far one of the most interesting segments I've seen from BP in awhile. Fascinating window into the Trump-driven GOP navigating post-liberalism.
So Emily, "Trump doesn't have any clear vision so the people most likely to be hired created a vision, but he totally didn't come up with it. The people he will hire came up with it."
@@MarkHicks326 That doesn't help his case when he's not planning but he's relying on the cabinet to do the planning and they've literally written a manual on how to fuck the country for the next 100 years. Kind of like Lewis Powell. He was just spitballing until Nixon made him a judge on the supreme court.
Ezra Klein is an absolutely dishonest actor. His long discussion with Sam Harris was embarrassing. I don't know how anyone could possibly think he has any credibility.
That was a tough listen yes, but also a while ago. I think he’s moved on since then and I find him thoughtful and interesting on most things these days
It's strange to me that people know what kinds of things he would do if he was in that scenario again and still want him back in when he can just change overturning rules or elections in different ways
@@joebriggs5781 It’s strange to me that all of this stuff was said about him in 2016, and yet none of it actually happened. At what point do we start to look at Democrats as the boy who cried wolf?
Maybe because Vance said he would not have certified the election like Mike Pence did? 🤷🏻♂️ maybe because Trump said he deserved a right for a 3rd term? Maybe because it tells something about trump general character and what he might to in other situation? Maybe because he did not pay enough of a price for it and should not be “pardon” by winning a new term?
I’m a little concerned how unconcerned Emily is with the “post-liberal” right believing it’s okay to blatantly lie and upend the constitution to achieve their ends. Gives me chills.
Bro what…you can’t just say the right is doing things the left admits to doing. The one single right you even care about is abortion and that’s not in the constitution
@@wtice4632 oh I'm sorry look up the people who ended their families because trump is their God? Or maybe look at the far right fools who have done mass attacks on Americans. The right only does a minimum of 50+% of all terror attacks in the usa.
Why is nobody talking about how trump constantly praises tom homan and stephen miller, saying theyre gonna be in his administration when they are the biggest cheerleaders and authors of project 2025
It's a little weird how she laughed throughout that interview. She's obviously uncomfortable doing these types of things but she needs to as a political commentator.
If Krystal "represents" a town, where people are eating pets and wild animals at parks without permit... don't you think she'd try to get the story straight? All I've seen is denials, but there's video evidence of NUMEROUS Instances... not just 1 town in Ohio but all over that state.
Yes, and how are eyewitness accounts not considered evidence all of a sudden. The people who live there said it was happening, and Emily just sits there and lets Krystal call Vance a liar.
I think JD is telling the truth when he says Trump was a way better president than he thought he would be. I think he was a way better president than a lot of people thought he would be. He used power with things he really cared about but left a lot of things up to the states. Was phenomenal with foreign policy. I mean people can’t deny that he really understands how to deal with those guys. Remember he was going to start WW 3?
There was a vote, the party's slated electors voted. This is just like our current system for president. You don't actually vote for president; you vote to tell electors to vote - yet they can actually vote different than you. A few states have laws to limit and/or assign punitive consequences but they can still split their vote.
@@Rationalityislost101 are we pretending that constitutes a real primary? At what point were delegates given real options? First they were given Biden as an option then handed off to Harris.
@@benjyperez5606 Delegates could have chosen anyone who was running. There were people who could have run but chose to abstain. That is their decision. If you have a problem with it, run for office.
@@Rationalityislost101 the old if you have a problem with corruption run for office argument…Bernie tried and we all saw what happened. DNC blatantly worked against his campaign just as they have worked against independent candidates. This is the party that while claiming the GOP will end democracy (nevermind that we live in a constitutional republic) for years has done everything in their power since at least HRC ran to ensure they fix the primaries or, as was the case this year, not even have one. Delegates couldn’t have selected anyone bc they weren’t given any other choices. Time and time again anyone who even tries to run against the party pick gets shutdown with the help of media, big tech and corporate money. The fact you are trying to excuse this or explain it shows your part of the problem. You’ve accepted these circumstances and bought into the lies of lesser evils and saving democracy for the establishment who couldn’t care less about voters.
@@Rationalityislost101 What you don't understand is that while there were people that were TOLD to abstain and did, there were others that were running in the primary despite what the party heads wanted. They were blacklisted from the media (except to bad mouth them) and their names taken off ballots in some states. Check Florida for an example. So, the people in the party weren't given a choice. Which gave you Biden, who everyone else didn't want and said was to old. Once proven right the same happened with Harris. Obama was right. There should have been an open primary.
The best part for me is - the ad I got b/f I could watch this segment is of a Michigan Physician Assistant saying “Don’t let Donald Trump fool you into believing that he doesn’t know anything about project 2025…”😂
Emily talking about the tension between respective philosophical schools of thought, and Krystal nodding along trying her best to look like she has the faintest fucking clue what philosophy even is.
Its not just her. These people have such a vitriolic response to opinions and beliefs they don't share it's genuinely disturbing. Trump is just a living effigy they can focus it all onto.
@@treborkroy5280damn it's almost like........like he tried to overthrow democracy based on a lie that he won the election. I don't know, color me crazy but it's just like theory..
It's NYT readers so what do you expect. They are hostile to any conservative. Also, most of the commentors don't seem to realize that she's on there to discuss certain ideas that a present in the movement. Not to elucidate her own personal opinion.
@@miramichi30 what ideas do you think she articulated well? What solution to what problem did she offer? Bc all I heard was "I dont really know what the solution to {insert made up problem here} is, but some conservatives take it too far." Shes not an intelligent person
you mean the 900 pages that the heritage foundation published themselves? the heritage foundation that has influenced right wing politics for 50 years?
@@vietimportsexcept the heritage foundation does this for every election...see there playbook against immigration lgbtq abortion...you can't defeat it by vote,only campaign reform
When are MAGAt going to realize that the president, defense secretary and U.S. Army secretary are the only people authorized to deploy the District of Columbia National Guard?
11:34 - Ah yes. This is why I don't watch Breaking Points anymore. What a load of unresearched bologna. Next thing you know she's going to start saying that Trump called neo-Nazis "very fine people". 🙄
I don’t they think they mean exactly Jan 6, I think they mean being loyal no matter what happens. They explained what they meant using Pence as an example. Did you watch the video?
@@jp5436 What's funny is watching both braindead partisans sparing each other over the same thing. You can point the finger, but are blind to seeing the same faults within yourself. Talk about Pretzel.
I keep seeing similar views to this comment. As if Trump never speaks of multiple terms, or Evangelicals not needing to vote again... What bot farm is pumping out this crap?
"We aren't really going to implement the policies that are incredibly unpopular when we get elected....even though we've talked about doing all of these things for decades."
@@zakger consistently raving about a constant invasion by foreigners (legal or otherwise as of lately) to plunge a country into a hell scape unless you are handed the reins isn't fear porn ?
Me either. Emily seems very naive compared to people like Frank Schaeffer whose father was a force in this movement when it really started shaking up politics in the 1980s. Now Schaeffer tries to warn people with an insider’s view.
![[LIVE] : ONE ลุมพินี 87 วันนี้!! คู่เอก "ก้องชัย vs โชคปรีชา"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YN6e7HVnekw/mqdefault.jpg)
Show me a politician that ISN'T opportunistic! Hell, Harris called Biden a racist and yet jumped at the opportunity to be VP because it helped her end goal!
When did she call Biden racist? Literally the first thing I googled about this is a factcheck providing the statements and evidence showing that Trump (as usual) just made it up so guys like you can eat it up. It’s a lot easier for Reps to just make stuff up rather than talk policy
Also that she believed the victims who alleged SA against him.... so....
💯 Well said!
Exactly! Vance called Trump the greatest threat to America back in 2016 and now he coddles his balls. Power is all that matters at the end of the day to a politician.
@@TonkyTronicus *getting re-elected is all that matters to them.
Breaking News: Think tanks filled with DC insiders exist.
Some are Conservative and some are Liberal.
Have you ever even read Project 2025? It's not a normal lib nor conservative think tank paper. They're the goals of the insane right who want to be rulers of us all, not governance with the consent of the people. Huge difference! I miss the old republicans who tried hard to get away from the insane right. Now, the nutjobs are running the asylum.
@@A-Wesker-5 Oh no! Muh democracy!!! 😱
@@zerocool5395Eliminating overtime pay to own the libs.
Heritage foundation is entirely conservative and they promised to eliminate overtime pay.
@@pluntchgunster6156 and i promise to wear pants on tuesdays, so what
You can take Krystal out of MSNBC but you can’t take MSNBC out of Krystal
I watched Ezra with Pete Buttigeig the other day on NYTimes podcast. Ezra talked about Pete winning Iowa in 2020 - a boldface lie! Remember Pete and the app he paid for called Shadow Ap, by Acronym (a company owned by his roommates girlfriend) - Shadow Ap was paid for by Pete's and Biden's campaign to count the votes- total disaster. Pete later came on and claimed victory while the NBC host questioned why he did that, "Cause I felt like it" said Pete the Cheat. Bernie probably won it - they ruined the Iowa caucuses - we actually don't know who won it. Ezra didn't discuss Pete's cheating.
Stop giving them views 😂😂😂
Nah, she pisses off the mouth breathers waaay more than MSNBC. Your presence here confirms it, lol.
I honestly stopped watching the videos.
I just stay subscribed to see what the big news stories are
Sounds good to me, MSNBC while corrupt imo is not as bad as Fox and CNN. But that is not saying much.
Hilarious hearing Krystal mock pence for toeing the line on Trump apparently memory holing kamala's take on Biden mental status.
Everytime anyone like you yap screams Republicans with no morals. Undercover proj 2025. Especially comparing right to left. I'll say it again proj 2025. Smh!
The difference is that is widely speculated the jill biden is the one leading the white house. While trump did not have the excuse of not leading, he was leading and every decision was his. We would rather a woman with a Master of Education degree leading the country while her husband was a stand in then a man child who had the emotional spectrum of a teenage girl lead while he did the policies selected by his staff.
Krystal is not subtle about her contempt for Harris, so I am really not sure what you're on about. She even criticises her for that exact point.
@@TimTYThow recent was this? And did she do it without adding any qualifiers before or after(to show that republicans are just as bad).
Carrying water for your boss ability to do a job isnt the same as pedaling the lies and all the bat shit crazy things Trump said and did during his entire term. It also isnt equivalent to undermine a fair election you lost for your boss.
Republicans always try to make these false equalancy that just doesn't hold up. Trump literally attempted a coup
What is so hard to understand about this. Obama quite literally said that The Heritage Foundation was the ideological wellspring behind the Affordable Care Act ("Obamacare").
Pretty sure he took most of his “Playbook” from the Center for American Progress - which is also where nearly ALL the MSM gets their headlines and talking points from… hence the connection to Soros etc… Heritage is peanuts in comparison to influence
Of course, they cooked up a way to keep making money while pretending that they are doing something for the people.
They are in the business of cooking up anything evil, and politicians on both sides have a great appetite for these projects, including Obama.
Exactly. But that was spin. Think tanks don't just think up stuff they like or want but do war game scenarios and think of things the other side might want to implement, which is what that was and it is unconstitutional but John Roberts was the SCOTUS swing vote and he made an overtly political move and unconstitutionally rewrote the mandate provision to rationalize his vote because the Republicans took control of Congress during that case so he couldn't send it back to the Democrats to rewrite. So he crapped on the constitution and abused his authority to pass Obamacare to, in his own words, prevent the court from looking political, because the Dems and media always cry SCOTUS decisions are political if they don't get their way and so the media and historians would like him and be nice to him. Coward. He should have been thrown off the court for that and he repeatedly proves to be problematic in his decisions. But the media and Dems act like he is some far right conservative which is ridiculous and they know it.
Why are we imagining a scenario where Vance is in Pence's shoes during January 6th? Trump will never campaign as a sitting president ever again. It is a non-issue due to term limits.
What if he wants Don Jr to be the next president. Gotta think far ahead. If you told people that Trump would stage a coup after losing, people would call you crazy. Yet Trump, Bannon, and his aides were already discussing countermeasures involving Trump declaring he won even before the votes were fully counted. They had been planning this for a long time
KB won’t stop bringing it up since she’s just a DNC useful idiot.
Vance would be the candidate in this scenario. Pretty obvious to imagine.
@@dave4148What!? You realize Vance and Trump are different people don’t you?
That’s like saying Kamala could have a son that brings cocaine into the White House.
It’s pretty obvious to imagine using your logic.
@@dave4148But Trump doesn’t have the power he had in 2020. I’m guessing you mean if Trump wins? If he loses he doesn’t have the power he did in 2020 as the POTUS.
"Trump could install people to help him if there's another January 6th"
Except Trump won't be running for election again if he becomes president, so what are you talking about??
What if Don jr wants to run. It’s funny how you Trump stands are only capable of thinking 2 seconds in the future
They really mean ... Trump won't agree with the 2024 election so he is going to cause another Jan 6. But how? There is no transition of power.
@@insanittiez4860if you think Trump will fight so much for anybody else, then u have been politically illiterate for the past 8yrs.. Trump ll care more abt preserving his legacy than helping out junior or jd vance
@@MichaelEdwards-gc2xx he will fight if it means him not going to jail. Plus that way, he will still be able to influence the Republican Party and basically serve as king maker. No one really cares about presidents after they leave. Trump will still want to stay relevant
@@insanittiez4860FYI, the term is "Stans" (i.e., Stan by Eminem)
People: We want the truth
Emily: You can't handle the truth!
the truth like the democrats create hurricanes to hurt red counties?
I think she handles the truth, not your truth
Also true is that while "Emily jahinsky porn" might get a lot of genuine results, the pictures will be adorably clothed.
Sigh
I think she’s slowly going left…too bad
@@pietervandyke5179 more like she's embarrassing of being associated with maga because shes just as demented as they are
Does Breaking Points do news anymore? This segment was mostly pointless speculation and opinion.
Etcetera Etcetera
The last segment tends to be opinion based, unless they have a speaking guest.
Stop being hyperbolic Matthew.
Watch Fox News then if you just want pure bullshi*
And at what point did you ever think this was news to begin with? It never has been. It has been a show that reflects opinion of todays news from differing political spectrums. This is the danger. Counting something as news when it most certainly isn't. That includes Fox, MSNBC, CNN, etc.
Sort of feels like Emily changes depending on the surrounding. She’s reasonable here but then when Megyn Kelly is raging she sort of fed it. Wonder if she’ll be joining her tonight.
exactly this, she's a chameleon and can't really be trusted to be delivering honest takes. she most definitely changes her positions and attitudes based on who she's talking to.
Nah, Emily is fairly consistent everywhere except this show. Her conservatism has been neutered in this studio, just like Saagar's has. Krystal's opinions are the way it is, and if you wanna disagree with her then you'd better stay within the 3-4 well defined areas within which tepid disagreement is acceptable.
Like all conservatives , at this point if she tows the party in in rational settings she'll sound like a lunatic.
"They eat dogs!" ...imagine actually saying that in public about people.
This is all conjecture and not truth or a lie. Not helpful in any way
Another BS segment is about hypothetical Jan 6. Don't waste your time.
Thanks.
The pearl clutching never ends.
i liked the clip. glad i saw the vid before seeing your comment🙂
You da real MVP
It should happen again and this time Trump should declare martial law. Send the military to build the border wall, then send them to clean up all the major crime ridden cities like Detroit and Chicago. This is what Nayib Bukele did in El Salvador. Encourage all able-bodied males to sign up for ICE to roundup and deport millions of illegals. Repeal the 19th Amendment. Then he should change the election rules to create an illiberal democracy like Orban, Erdogan, and Putin.
Another project 2025 segment? Tell me again how this channel isn’t declining into MSNBC? 😂
MSNBC 2.0
You don’t like how your secrets are openly talked about?
Oh please, lol
awww did BP hurt your feelings that you have to cry about it now? you're just helping drive up the view count on this topic so you can thank yourself for this segment
@@tabronholloway5821 hardcore liberals and conservatives are exactly the same. All you guys do is cry 🤣🤣🤣
Genuinely enjoy the chemistry and conversations between Emily and Krystal. Always appreciate Saagar's perspective as well, but this is a fresh duo that would benefit from a regular rotation IMHO.
Cable news and breaking points seem the same now.
Glenn Greenwald - Project 2025; Untangling fact from fiction with Heritage Foundation President Kevin Roberts
Always Glenn Greenwald. Glenn Greenwald - Anything. A true journalist
Thanks. I'll check it out. Gleen is about the only person I kinda trust with anything news worthy.
@@lface7426Glenn is very obviously audience-captured lol. His entire shtick is “Donald Trump who I do not support…..”
Glenn is the best journalist out there
@@lface7426sure. Wasn’t Glen Greenwald making excuses for Trump’s coup 😂
Breaking points? More like Broken points
Got iiiiiiiiim!
Did you have to write that one down genius 😂 no wonder all the great artists are leftists
@@tonywords6713I'd like some examples, if you don't mind.
@@treborkroy5280Kurt cobain
Good to see others who agree, I thought I was going crazy for a minute there. Yeah, this sh*t broke. Too bad
I am not a conservative. But listening to Emily on this and the Ezra Klein podcast was fascinating. Very interesting and well informed.
Krystal slowly sliding this channel to the left. Saagar and Emily growing twigs and leaves
Etcetera Etcetera
I’m pretty sure if they’re moving left, it’s because MAGA is hard to defend.
@@seanwhelan6960 cringe
Going to the left means being closer to reality. Good
@@tommyliu7020yep you are so right. Nothing screams being closer to reality than tampons in boys elementary school bathrooms!
Umm tulsi and rfk jr... big difference
Exactly!
Great team for Trump's transition. Project 2025 was developed by the Heritage Foundation - the DNC grabbed it and are scaring the Dems into the voting both. Screw the Democrats, I'm leaving with RFK Jr.
I used to like the show but I can't make it through an video anymore because of Krystals Bias
I'm still checking in bc it's going to be a bit of comedy gold to see Krystal's face after the next Trump victory.
There'll be a lot of cope in the comments too
If you only want a conservative bias like Emily, then there are hundreds of channels that pander to conservatives. We come here because we get to hear both sides. Stop crying! 😂
@@kaybrown7733 I just goes to show that some people aren't deep thinkers. The whole idea of the show is to have both sides. Some people are so into the cult that they lose the ability to think for themselves.
@@kaybrown7733Applying project 2025 to Trump's campaign is just called a lie , we want honesty not pandering
Wow what a confounding problem, I'm sorry you aren't smart enough to figure out the solution!!!
So why are we talking about Jan 6? Are we presuming Trump's running for a 3rd term?
Because Orange Man is literally hitler haven't you heard?
Pointless 🤦♀️
I'll just call you stupid and be done
Trump did give a speech at an NRA meeting he could be considered a three-term president if he clinches a wins in November and with SCOTUS in his pocket and combine with his other slip if they vote for him this November, "in four years, you don't have to vote again. We'll have it fixed so good, you're not gonna have to vote." Trump himself is giving lots of people pause for voting for a potential dictator
Maybe because Vance could run and he said he would not have certified the election like Mike Pence did? 🤷🏻♂️ maybe because Trump said he deserved a right for a 3rd term? Maybe because it tells something about trump general character and what he might to in other situation? Maybe because he did not pay enough of a price for it and should not be “pardon” by winning a new term?
Emily should be Caitlin Clark for Halloween
Emily is a real nerd. Like an old school nerd.
Love the motherly look on Krystal's face when she interacts with Emily and how psyched Emily gets to have these segments. You can tell there's mad respect between the two of them.
Never heard of a "Red Caesar" before, this show is great for exposing new ideas and perspectives. Thx.
This was a stupid conversation that completely failed to grasp the motivations of the subjects, I would expect more from Emily, not so much from Krystal
Well, she fell short for you and everyone else, as she seems to do often, as of late.
Ya i noticed too@@Apoplectic_Spock
Why expect more from Emily? Cause she’s not as loud?? Her opinions suck and her partnership with an idiot like Megan Kelly is noting.
Emily is a bit lacking in depth and breadth it seems. I’ve listened to many of her interviews. Once she’s outside of her own spaces, she struggles a bit. I give her credit for going out into other situations though. Her interview of Maryanne Williamson was a good one. I think Maryanne taught her quite a bit and Emily genuinely seemed to appreciate the conversation.
@@medp5636maryanne taught her what? Healing crystals?
I'm gonna stop watching Breaking points, Ball is literally using BP to campaign for the democratic party these days, she's truly insufferable, I can't even imagine the things that her co host thinking behind her back, she's biased beyond reasoning on a show that is supposed to be in the middle of both parties, she really does think we're stoopid😅
Krystal "It's my Turn Now" Ball
Personally I don’t think this content is up to brand standards. The title Labeling is misleading towards the subject matter. The way in which the hosts made negative characterizations about the motives and intentions of a public figure without adequately supporting the characterization with objective facts is also problematic. Ultimately I feel this channel is capable of doing better than this and I look forward to seeing it grows and does better in the future.
PS: If your hosts were willing to make the same claims directly to the man’s face. I’d be willing to show up for that. Would they be willing to say the same thing directly to the person they’re talking about?
Yes the degradation of this show has been precipitous.
They've taken a nosedive
Do you pay for their subscription?
One distinction seems pretty important here. Emily plausibly suggests that people like Vance, Deneen, and Vermeule might not think of the Constitution as a sacred text. That’s not the same thing as believing that the end justifies the means, per se. Serious Catholics believe in multiple moral absolutes. There’s no reason a serious Catholic would have to think provisions of the Constitution were or embodied these sorts of absolutes, but a serious Catholic might well think that, whatever the Constitution, there were all sorts of things it would be wrong to do under any circumstances.
Krystal hates hearing the truth about project 2025
Get checked out for your Krystal derangement syndrome
She's seething bro
The truth is literally written down in their Project 2025 book 😂 Trump can't outrun it & he's going to lose partly because of it. Unfortunately it doesn't end with Trump. Once he loses they'll put it on the next Republican nominee. Hopefully that helps them lose too.
She could barely talk she was soo mad
Etcetera Etcetera
Emily is my fav conservative pundit. She's thoughtful, measured, humble, civil, knowledgeable and smart.
Part of the issue is that true Conservatives seem to genuinely not understand leftist politics at all. In 2020 when Trump would accuse Biden of being part of the "radical left," I just assumed he was saying it performatively in a tongue-in-cheek kind of way. But as I've listened to more and more Conservative media over the past four years, there's no question that many of these people really genuinely DO think Biden and Harris are extremely far left (Marxist even). To those of us on the REAL progressive left, this type of rhetoric is always hilarious bc we all know that Biden and Harris are nothing more than center-right establishment neoliberals. Not only are they NOT radical leftists or Marxists, they're not even in the same solar system as the real progressive left.
It's all culture war now. When conservatives say marxist they're talking about transgenders in girls sports. When was the last time universal healthcare was even a major issue, 2016? Biden did anti-trust, if Trump is elected he will crack down on unionization. But nobody is going to care. New conservatives are calling for a Caesar to take power, to save America from groomers and immigrants. Funded by silicon valley billionaires like Peter Thiel, and Elon Musk who want lower taxes and to destroy "woke socialism".
Kamala was the most “progressive” member of Congress when she was a Senator. Left of Bernie Sanders. If you don’t think that’s left enough, you’re ignoring the data.
@@rdf4ta927 She talked a good game, but other than co-sponsoring a ceremonial universal health care bill that had no chance of passing, she actually didn't do much to advance the progressive agenda while in the Senate. And sure enough, now that she's a breath from the White House, her domestic agenda is nothing more than center-left & her foreign policy is center-right. Lots of centrist Dems like to claim they're progressive, but talk - action = shit.
Kyle Kulinski: "Biden gave us the best economy in decades!"
🙄
The bleach has indeed eaten his brain.
I mean what did Obama do policy wise to help the economy other than fixing the recession hardship in the Midwest saving auto factories in 2009? Biden has the chips act, and inflation act.
Just print money. it is the key
His economy is technically better than Trump’s so it might actually be the best economy in decades. Maybe with the exception of Obama
This is breaking points, morphing into MSM😂
My favorite last line is from Animal Farm by George Orwell.
“The creatures outside looked from pig to man, and from man to pig, and from pig to man again; but already it was impossible to say which was which.”
This was by far one of the most interesting segments I've seen from BP in awhile. Fascinating window into the Trump-driven GOP navigating post-liberalism.
Reading through the comments always makes me wonder why many of the commenters bother to watch the show at all. lol
So Emily, "Trump doesn't have any clear vision so the people most likely to be hired created a vision, but he totally didn't come up with it. The people he will hire came up with it."
Why don't you quote where she also says," he's like most Americans, not planning!"
@@MarkHicks326 That doesn't help his case when he's not planning but he's relying on the cabinet to do the planning and they've literally written a manual on how to fuck the country for the next 100 years. Kind of like Lewis Powell. He was just spitballing until Nixon made him a judge on the supreme court.
I guess nothing notable has happened today?
“I wish this newspaper had a podcast” said nobody ever.
Where are the actual conservatives?
They died with Bob Dole
Lol.
Clintons killed them
they're called the democrats now
They’re either far too right to be relatable or they’re democrats.
lol emily just out here like "conservatives will embrace fascism to achieve their goals"
Just like american libs then.
@@philosophicalthirstworms6645I remember when libs famously tried to steal the 2016 election when they lost. Do you even hear yourself?
Why are you spreading malicious lies?
@@wtice4632 they literally have Evil in their name. Obviously a troll account.
Ezra Klein is an absolutely dishonest actor.
His long discussion with Sam Harris was embarrassing. I don't know how anyone could possibly think he has any credibility.
That was a tough listen yes, but also a while ago. I think he’s moved on since then and I find him thoughtful and interesting on most things these days
Any discussion with Sam Harris is painful. He’s such a lightweight but takes himself so seriously.
I always thought he was cute. He'd indeed make a good actor.
@@JonnyxburnSo Ezra is no longer against research if the findings disagree with his beliefs?
Is Erza a Zionist too?
This would be Trump’s second term, right? So he won’t be running again. Vance may… but not Trump. So tell me why we’re talking about J6 again?
Trump talked about running a 3rd term at an NRA meeting. And you think the Heritage foundation and SCOTUS won't work together to make that happen ?
It's strange to me that people know what kinds of things he would do if he was in that scenario again and still want him back in when he can just change overturning rules or elections in different ways
@@joebriggs5781
It’s strange to me that all of this stuff was said about him in 2016, and yet none of it actually happened. At what point do we start to look at Democrats as the boy who cried wolf?
@@SeiyaSoiya-un4jjso Jan6, the fake elector scheme, 91 indictments never happened ?? My gawd you MAGAts are brainwashed beyond belief
Maybe because Vance said he would not have certified the election like Mike Pence did? 🤷🏻♂️ maybe because Trump said he deserved a right for a 3rd term? Maybe because it tells something about trump general character and what he might to in other situation? Maybe because he did not pay enough of a price for it and should not be “pardon” by winning a new term?
I’m a little concerned how unconcerned Emily is with the “post-liberal” right believing it’s okay to blatantly lie and upend the constitution to achieve their ends. Gives me chills.
emily is a right wing hack
Bro what…you can’t just say the right is doing things the left admits to doing. The one single right you even care about is abortion and that’s not in the constitution
It should, because those people are insane. They want to rule the people, not govern.
You mean like the dems do? Lol
@pierce4026 does he mean like the dems do?
Don't you mean the Fed violence at the Capitol , Krystal?
Mad you guys got arrested for attempting to murder for trump
@@KingZNINwhy are you a liar?
@@KingZNINfirst learn some English champ.
@@wtice4632 oh I'm sorry look up the people who ended their families because trump is their God? Or maybe look at the far right fools who have done mass attacks on Americans. The right only does a minimum of 50+% of all terror attacks in the usa.
@@siegga7125 oh no the grammar N.A.Z.I is here whatcha going to do throw a fit and threaten to put c4 in my house or something like your buddies
Why is nobody talking about how trump constantly praises tom homan and stephen miller, saying theyre gonna be in his administration when they are the biggest cheerleaders and authors of project 2025
I’ve not heard a single thing like that. I hear about RFK Jr, Tulsi, Vivek, Shanahan and Massey helping shape the administration.
Both side ‘suspend democracy’ often. It doesn’t make it right. Policies is ALL that I am voting for! 2016-2020 were much better for me!
Emily is easily the best host on this channel, certainly the most intelligent.
hahahahahahahaha. amazing
Says the guy who says "not all humans have rights"... Quite the endorsement! 👍👏
She’s the best at having truly terrible political takes
People trust Emily. Krystal should take some notes 📝
It's a little weird how she laughed throughout that interview. She's obviously uncomfortable doing these types of things but she needs to as a political commentator.
If Krystal "represents" a town, where people are eating pets and wild animals at parks without permit... don't you think she'd try to get the story straight? All I've seen is denials, but there's video evidence of NUMEROUS Instances... not just 1 town in Ohio but all over that state.
Yes, and how are eyewitness accounts not considered evidence all of a sudden. The people who live there said it was happening, and Emily just sits there and lets Krystal call Vance a liar.
I think JD is telling the truth when he says Trump was a way better president than he thought he would be. I think he was a way better president than a lot of people thought he would be. He used power with things he really cared about but left a lot of things up to the states. Was phenomenal with foreign policy. I mean people can’t deny that he really understands how to deal with those guys. Remember he was going to start WW 3?
Krystal’s voice 😖
I thought this was fascinating. Really interesting hearing Emily talk about this. Glad Krystal poked deeper into this with her
The condescension oozing from the vocal fry of Ezra is difficult to tolerate.
All the liberal elites sound like that, esp the DC ones.
"opportunistic" describes every politician, ever.
Vocal Fry now sounds as ridiculous as the Transatlantic Accent.
Boys show is best show because Krystal's vocal fry has gotten so annoying
Pretending Emily represents conservative values is a joke I like to think of while I’m getting my teeth cleaned by a construction worker
Why do you say that?
Credit for moving from Biden to Harris with no democratic vote??!
There was a vote, the party's slated electors voted. This is just like our current system for president. You don't actually vote for president; you vote to tell electors to vote - yet they can actually vote different than you.
A few states have laws to limit and/or assign punitive consequences but they can still split their vote.
@@Rationalityislost101 are we pretending that constitutes a real primary? At what point were delegates given real options? First they were given Biden as an option then handed off to Harris.
@@benjyperez5606 Delegates could have chosen anyone who was running. There were people who could have run but chose to abstain. That is their decision. If you have a problem with it, run for office.
@@Rationalityislost101 the old if you have a problem with corruption run for office argument…Bernie tried and we all saw what happened. DNC blatantly worked against his campaign just as they have worked against independent candidates. This is the party that while claiming the GOP will end democracy (nevermind that we live in a constitutional republic) for years has done everything in their power since at least HRC ran to ensure they fix the primaries or, as was the case this year, not even have one. Delegates couldn’t have selected anyone bc they weren’t given any other choices. Time and time again anyone who even tries to run against the party pick gets shutdown with the help of media, big tech and corporate money. The fact you are trying to excuse this or explain it shows your part of the problem. You’ve accepted these circumstances and bought into the lies of lesser evils and saving democracy for the establishment who couldn’t care less about voters.
@@Rationalityislost101 What you don't understand is that while there were people that were TOLD to abstain and did, there were others that were running in the primary despite what the party heads wanted. They were blacklisted from the media (except to bad mouth them) and their names taken off ballots in some states. Check Florida for an example. So, the people in the party weren't given a choice. Which gave you Biden, who everyone else didn't want and said was to old. Once proven right the same happened with Harris. Obama was right. There should have been an open primary.
The best part for me is - the ad I got b/f I could watch this segment is of a Michigan Physician Assistant saying “Don’t let Donald Trump fool you into believing that he doesn’t know anything about project 2025…”😂
Emily talking about the tension between respective philosophical schools of thought, and Krystal nodding along trying her best to look like she has the faintest fucking clue what philosophy even is.
Ezra Klein isn’t in the media space, you have to listen to what he says. It’s more propaganda than journalism
I didn’t learn anything new about project 25 but what else can Krystal inform the masses.
If this show was a voting district it would be D+12. Krystal just runs roughshod over everyone.
Krystal might seriously have TDS
Mite??🥴
you have fking KDS
Its not just her. These people have such a vitriolic response to opinions and beliefs they don't share it's genuinely disturbing. Trump is just a living effigy they can focus it all onto.
I think there's more TDS in his supporters. No man with a 30 year plus history of lying and scamming deserves blind faith.
@@treborkroy5280damn it's almost like........like he tried to overthrow democracy based on a lie that he won the election. I don't know, color me crazy but it's just like theory..
I’m so glad we have Emily. I’m really starting to prefer Counter Points.
Where do I fall is the categories you discussed? I'm voting for Trump but would rather vote for Tulsi, Vivek, or Rand Paul for POTUS.
That was hilarious. 🤣 Emily called Trump “a tool.”
Twice 😂
Trump said the author of project 2025 was a a hole and he didn’t want any part of it. Let’s see how crystal presents it
Established has a well oiled machine; no matter blue or red, they’ll have to do as they’re told.
The comments on that video are the most entertaining part. No one is buying her bullshit.
It's NYT readers so what do you expect. They are hostile to any conservative. Also, most of the commentors don't seem to realize that she's on there to discuss certain ideas that a present in the movement. Not to elucidate her own personal opinion.
@@miramichi30 what ideas do you think she articulated well? What solution to what problem did she offer? Bc all I heard was "I dont really know what the solution to {insert made up problem here} is, but some conservatives take it too far." Shes not an intelligent person
If JD Vance is "on the spectrum" on the right Krystal Baller is certainly "on the spectrum on the left."
Where is the comically large prop Project 2025 book from the DNC 😂
you mean the 900 pages that the heritage foundation published themselves? the heritage foundation that has influenced right wing politics for 50 years?
@@vietimportsexcept the heritage foundation does this for every election...see there playbook against immigration lgbtq abortion...you can't defeat it by vote,only campaign reform
@@vietimportsplease stop
@@vietimportsInfluenced conservative thought for 50 years, but now all of a sudden is a grave threat to democracy…
@@atomicsmithI don’t think anyone who’s not a conservative has ever suggested that they weren’t.
Emily Jashinsky looks much happier to be on Unherd Undercurrents than to be on Breaking Wind podcast.
When are you guys going to admit on this show Trump ask for 10 k national guard Troop for January 6th and Nancy denied the request
When are MAGAt going to realize that the president, defense secretary and U.S. Army secretary are the only people authorized to deploy the District of Columbia National Guard?
I find it amusing that anyone is delusional enough to believe a single thing trump says.
THEY'RE EATING THE DOGS!
@@commandershepard9920 you aren’t very bright lol
@@modernrelic7092 the obesity rate in America says dogs isn’t far from your menu either
@@uncleb7821 That makes as much sense as a trump speech. None.
11:34 - Ah yes. This is why I don't watch Breaking Points anymore. What a load of unresearched bologna.
Next thing you know she's going to start saying that Trump called neo-Nazis "very fine people". 🙄
OMG There can’t be another January 6. He’s not running again. I don’t understand that stupid question.
I don’t they think they mean exactly Jan 6, I think they mean being loyal no matter what happens. They explained what they meant using Pence as an example. Did you watch the video?
Listen to the video, they explain directly what they mean.
So headline says Emily spills beans on project 2025 and then they only talk about project 2025 for one minute 😂🤦♂️
Now I remember why I unsubscribed
It was their anti-Ukraine campaign that did it for me.
@@dannygarland6366
😂😂😂
@@dannygarland6366Still lost that issue?
@@dannygarland6366 bro, just move to Ukraine already
But you still watch the content!
Everyone on this panel is a…DEMOCRAT activist.
Conservatives twisting themselves like a pretzel to vote for a tyrant. Shit is funny
Brain dead take
What's funny is that that you were going to vote for Biden. Talk about twisting yourself in a pretzel.
@@jp5436 lmao ok man whatever you tell yourself. Biden didn't try to organize a coup, but go on ahead and keep twisting yourself lol
You laugh so you don't cry.
We see you bro.
😂
@@jp5436 What's funny is watching both braindead partisans sparing each other over the same thing. You can point the finger, but are blind to seeing the same faults within yourself. Talk about Pretzel.
Yay Emily!
They said they were going to eliminate paid overtime. There’s a reason Republicans don’t want you to talk about it.
I'm seeing that trump wants to eliminate taxes on overtime. That's very different than what you're alleging.
What a waste of time I could have watched CNN to get this bias.
How is there going to be another Jan 6th. He’d that to already be president.
I keep seeing similar views to this comment.
As if Trump never speaks of multiple terms, or Evangelicals not needing to vote again...
What bot farm is pumping out this crap?
A lot of these are not actually bots. Many are real people who are simply stoop-ID.
Emphasis on the id.
@@anthonytwohill9726so explain it then
@@christerry1773
Very simple: Coup detat plus constitutional crisis.
Krystal lied about Vance and the pet story, yet again. She lies almost every segment now
sure Emily, conservatives think the constitution can be stretched for thee but not for We. quite uncomplicated 🤓
Love Krystal’s passive aggression
The rightwing doesn't want a red Ceaser, Emily. They want an orange one.
Trump is not who I would choose, but Rand Paul is not in the picture
Vance will flip on Trump the moment it's politically convenient aa he's obviously an opportunist despite what Emily says........
Guys Trump can’t run again for reelection if he wins. So why are you bring up another Jan 6th?
Thanks Emily
"We aren't really going to implement the policies that are incredibly unpopular when we get elected....even though we've talked about doing all of these things for decades."
Loved the interview. Way to go Emily! Ezra Klein hits different.
Trying to downplay the possibility of Project 2025 being implemented brings me no comfort.
That's exactly what democrats are hoping for. That's why they push fear porn
@@zakger consistently raving about a constant invasion by foreigners (legal or otherwise as of lately) to plunge a country into a hell scape unless you are handed the reins isn't fear porn ?
Im still waiting for you people to show me the scary part
Me either. Emily seems very naive compared to people like Frank Schaeffer whose father was a force in this movement when it really started shaking up politics in the 1980s. Now Schaeffer tries to warn people with an insider’s view.
What’s so scary about project 2025? Point to what page in the 900 plus page document has you the most concerned
Who certifies the election in this case? Does Harris certify?
Who certified in 1988?
Arizona governors race...
So as I looked up, the answer is indeed yes, Harris will be the one to preside over the certification.
Yo, I heard Emily’s grandparents followed Wall Street Bets a day late and didn’t make any cake.
So basically, JD will break his oath to the Constitution if he can get some things he wants.
It’s hilarious to hear Krystal accuse the Trump team of pausing democracy to save democracy… when that’s exactly how we ended up with Kamala 😂
Trump picks RFK and Tulsi
Scamala picks Dick Cheney
Trump for the win!
🎯🎯🎯‼️
@@andyatmosphere she didn’t pick Dick Cheney lol
@@camilodelvillar6860 you’re right, he picked her. She’s just a tool.