Regarding the speculation of winter consumptions with Fisker, when we had -30 degrees Centigrade here e-C4 had range slightly over 100 km. Enyaq's consumption was 36 kW/100 km. So normal doubled easily
The car is amazing in general. But I always felt skeptical when I first saw it a few years ago. I even remember that the CEO got offended by my comment back in the days... Well, guess what. Let's wait now for Bjorn to test the Faraday Future FF91... 😅
Could it be that because the car reports the energy coming in from the charger rather than the actual energy going to the battery? Also what lights is the car using? LED?
Bjørn, your consumption is very high and significanty higher than what I experience in my FOO which I have beed driving 8000 km since September last year. I agree that the Fisker Ocean is thirsty, however you are driving fairly fast at > 123 km/hour (which is clearly above the speed limit). In addition you are driving on winter tires in sub zero (C) temperatures. My experience during winter time is a practical range of 420 km (100%) and now in the spring 550 - 600 km (100%) provided I keep to the speed limit, not exceeding 110 km/h. Overall you keep on making a big point about the rear light that keeps turning itself on - this never happened to my car and I never heard that from other Fisker owners. Despite some bugs which have become more rare I actually like it a lot - apart from the issues related to a looming BK and incomplete software deliveries - which may never come
Just another point to Bjørn - tyre pressure is also important for milage - did Bjørn check that the tyre pressure was at 42 for the winter tyres - if they were let’s say 20% lower - millage will be impaired. I changed to my 22” summer tyres and they require 44 pressure - over the winter storage they were down below 30, hence the common advice for all cars is to regularly make sure your tyres are correctly pressurized 😊.
Yet another piece of advice; when seeking to reduce consumption in Earth Mode or any other mode - use the seat heater and the steering weel heater instead of bumping the HVAC up to maximum heat - this is of course a well known advice for all cars, not only for Fisker - have a look at this review from a Dane in the US who has driven 10.000 milen in his Ocean One and who has even ordered an Extreme at the discounted price th-cam.com/video/6QAmCSMIgbg/w-d-xo.htmlsi=lqh-Tf7lM6lVMrXL
MG4 does sth simmilar with the rage. Sure if you hammer it the next charge won't show super many km but if you reach 40 percent the shown km doesn't match your consumption anymore. The car takes KMs away to be safe that you dont overestimate how far you could go. If you calculate yourself, you could go the rest of the trip easy. The car steals about 10-20 percent of your initial kilometers just to be sure you charge :D
Probably needs another three years for optimization and redesign for more efficiency and elimination of bugs to make a more mature product in the next generation.
@@ziggyyo If there ever is a next generation, and that's a big if at the moment. Even if another manufacturer buys Fisker, will they be able to make money on spending that much time refining this car? Or will they get a better profit by just taking what's good about the Fisker company - skilled employees, knowledge, etc. - and incorporating it into their own business structure, while ditching the rest?
RUSSEBUSS 😂😂 Funny. Would never buy a Fisker. Especially not now with the discounted prices, because in the little fine print it says that Fisker can void every warranty claim and repair of parts. Permanent loss of warranty. Who will accept that,?
What an odd result. I am now curious about its consumption in 20 C weather 🤔 For the impressions video, maybe you will get to watch other reviews as well and compare the conclusions 👍👍
Maybe the heating system is eating up lots of energy without being able to deliver it to the cabin? I would not expect wonders at 20 degrees Celsius, but the consumption should indeed be significantly lower: Less air density, but not too hot, no need to run cooling systems at maximum power.
Would be nice and helpful to see the amount of charging stops in the spreed sheet. Fewer stops is far more important for me instead being 10 min faster
I enjoy all your videos, Bjørn. I have a 2023 Model 3 LFP with 24000km, I drove down to 3% to test battery degradation and worked out less than 1kWh loss since September. Wifey insisted on coming along with me - she is also 38 weeks pregnant 😊
I think if you did this test in ~10-15c weather, you'd get to the 300Wh/Km range, which over 1000Km, which should be ~one less charging stop. This would save ~15-20m off or your 1000Km time, so definitely a good road tripper, even if consumption is a bit on the bad side. Like you said though, I think the design of the car, while it looks great, has a huge impact on consumption.
Fisker, unfortunately, released the ocean to early on the streets. Customers become in fact alpha testing, not even beta testing. This, combined with the current Financial situation will come to a bad end, I assume. That‘s sad, because the ocean looks really nice and the huge battery could have been a perfect Match, if it would be more efficient.
Fisker.... FSRN charging Up 57 % Today. Numerous awards won by the Ocean SUV EV in Europe. Hopefully the Ronin, Pear and Alaska Pick-up are now in the creation pipeline with so much interest to purchase the company Fisker. Thumbs up video/ comments. Thanks.
The short answer is yes. Unless you are an EV technician yourself, or know one you could go to if something breaks since it will have no support over time when it starts to break or glitch.
At the current price, almost half 25k off, I'd say go for it. Unfortunately, we don't have a Fisker location in Canada. There's one Ocean One up for sale, but that trim isn't being reduced, yet and it's by a private seller. So, highly doubt they'd sell for less than the 90+k asking.
@@2023gainer Just because there are four automakers trying to buy Fisker, that doesn't mean the Fisker name will continue to exist, or that there will be support for the car in the future. These other companies might just be looking to integrate Fisker's assets - skilled employees, knowledge, etc. - into their own existing business, while ditching the Fisker brand and cars altogether. That is very often what happens with buy-ups like these.
Thanks for doing this. Such potential for the SUV and in my own opinion, way better looking than a Model Y. If only Henrik and Geeta weren't in charge, they'd prob be a success. He is a great designer but cut too many corners and not a good manager.
375Wh/km is a bit absurd. There should be e "minimum efficiency" standard to be able to sell in Europe. Over here at least, if you buy a large displacement ICE car you get a nice massive bill in taxes to pay, but there is no penalty if you buy this brick on wheels. It makes no sense. Hyundai & Tesla had the correct approach, build a family car with decent range and very good efficiency. You don't need massive expensive batteries to get decent range.
Check the result table at 30:51 - the average consumption is 348 Wh/km - it’s not the worst consumption, and the 10h15m time is quite good. The Ocean needs some software and hardware optimizations to improve the efficiency and to lower the energy consumption. Let’s hope there is an investor to make this possible for the current Ocean and a next generation car.
@@ziggyyo The time is decent because they put in a massive and heavy battery. If the car was aerodynamically efficient they could get away with a smaller capacity battery and therefore cost. This is why they are going bankrupt.
i think its better to watch previous reviews... just add to the general conversation... plus those reviewers will probably never do a second take or a comeback but later reviews can function as such
4 OEMs have signed NDAs and in DD stage to acquire Fisker. 3 weeks to see how much financing or other offers occur. No BK was ever going to happen to such a superior product line.
@@iaintdonknow It has put one of the Safest and attractive, affordable EV products on the roads, set new 1st calendar year EV production record, won numerous awards with Zero Recalls. The Facts defeat the haters all day long
Tack!
Takk skal du ha :)
Thank. you for this challenge Bjorn. I'm still impressed with this car none the less. All the best to you and yours.
Sad that Fisker didn't get this done, was optimistic but has realized that this is probably over for Fisker.
Maybe they should have just stuck to one model at a time?
Fisker is highly inefficient: Expect more FSRN stonk drop next Monday.
@@leftcoaster67 They have only produced one vehicle even though four were designed.
@@shckltnebay Not every company makes it. Not just EV's but car manufacturing is hard.
@@leftcoaster67 I think Fisker's biggest issue was timing the market, which Tesla did perfectly
Love the way the trip meter skips random decimals at the end....
Lovely car. Really cool. Much cooler than any other EV:s out there. ❤❤
soon you can claim to have driven one of the last Oceans ever produced
they will get investors or bought
Regarding the speculation of winter consumptions with Fisker, when we had -30 degrees Centigrade here e-C4 had range slightly over 100 km. Enyaq's consumption was 36 kW/100 km. So normal doubled easily
The car is amazing in general. But I always felt skeptical when I first saw it a few years ago. I even remember that the CEO got offended by my comment back in the days... Well, guess what. Let's wait now for Bjorn to test the Faraday Future FF91... 😅
Bjorn switch to the dark side 0:58
Healthy happy Family Bjorn. Good luck. Sad that Fisker seems to be going the way of the Tucker Torpedo.
Dude that new cybex carseat looks amazing and super safe!! Whoah
Will you be able to test Lucid before the company goes kaput? 🤔
kaput in german needs another t: kaputt, you can hear the crash.
@@christiankuppler6643 Thank you!
Lucid should be fine. Backed by Saudi money. They like luxury EVs
@@markyates5744 I hope so...
You da man Bjorn!
taco table woes again at 7:55 😂
A fair review, some others have been so bitchy. Startups always have bugs.
Impressive time considering the temperature and the fact it was in AWD mode
It was mostly in Earth mode.
Maybe earth mode is intended to simulate caves. Cool to cold year round.
That consumption is more than my e-Expert!
Very good video Bjørn. I tested speedometer on original 22" sommer tires/rims is only 1 km/h off .
*1 km/h
That blinker sound 😂 but whole car is questionable
So much promise, so little good management.
Cop pulled you over asking for your registration and you reach under your seat. Really it's in my glove box!😂
Bjorn is always a joy to listen to!
Could it be that because the car reports the energy coming in from the charger rather than the actual energy going to the battery? Also what lights is the car using? LED?
It's still buggy.
Bjørn, your consumption is very high and significanty higher than what I experience in my FOO which I have beed driving 8000 km since September last year. I agree that the Fisker Ocean is thirsty, however you are driving fairly fast at > 123 km/hour (which is clearly above the speed limit). In addition you are driving on winter tires in sub zero (C) temperatures. My experience during winter time is a practical range of 420 km (100%) and now in the spring 550 - 600 km (100%) provided I keep to the speed limit, not exceeding 110 km/h. Overall you keep on making a big point about the rear light that keeps turning itself on - this never happened to my car and I never heard that from other Fisker owners. Despite some bugs which have become more rare I actually like it a lot - apart from the issues related to a looming BK and incomplete software deliveries - which may never come
Just another point to Bjørn - tyre pressure is also important for milage - did Bjørn check that the tyre pressure was at 42 for the winter tyres - if they were let’s say 20% lower - millage will be impaired. I changed to my 22” summer tyres and they require 44 pressure - over the winter storage they were down below 30, hence the common advice for all cars is to regularly make sure your tyres are correctly pressurized 😊.
Yet another piece of advice; when seeking to reduce consumption in Earth Mode or any other mode - use the seat heater and the steering weel heater instead of bumping the HVAC up to maximum heat - this is of course a well known advice for all cars, not only for Fisker - have a look at this review from a Dane in the US who has driven 10.000 milen in his Ocean One and who has even ordered an Extreme at the discounted price
th-cam.com/video/6QAmCSMIgbg/w-d-xo.htmlsi=lqh-Tf7lM6lVMrXL
Lot of Europeans have this car and can answer the cold question with power consumption
MG4 does sth simmilar with the rage.
Sure if you hammer it the next charge won't show super many km but if you reach 40 percent the shown km doesn't match your consumption anymore. The car takes KMs away to be safe that you dont overestimate how far you could go. If you calculate yourself, you could go the rest of the trip easy. The car steals about 10-20 percent of your initial kilometers just to be sure you charge :D
Nice vid!
Seems like the ligths are angled up way too far. Don't they blind oncoming traffic even with highbeams off?
Business class :)
22:45 150Wh/km ;) nice consumption for a 2.5t car 😜
This might be one of those "it could have been great" stories. The potential seems to be there, but it's just an unfinished product.
Probably needs another three years for optimization and redesign for more efficiency and elimination of bugs to make a more mature product in the next generation.
@@ziggyyo If there ever is a next generation, and that's a big if at the moment.
Even if another manufacturer buys Fisker, will they be able to make money on spending that much time refining this car? Or will they get a better profit by just taking what's good about the Fisker company - skilled employees, knowledge, etc. - and incorporating it into their own business structure, while ditching the rest?
RUSSEBUSS 😂😂 Funny.
Would never buy a Fisker. Especially not now with the discounted prices, because in the little fine print it says that Fisker can void every warranty claim and repair of parts. Permanent loss of warranty. Who will accept that,?
BYD Dolphin ad during this video, figures
Honda EV advert too, perhaps Honda should spend more or building and less on advertising their BEV cars
Lotus ad, jawdrop when I saw the prices even though I've consider a Porsche ...
What an odd result. I am now curious about its consumption in 20 C weather 🤔
For the impressions video, maybe you will get to watch other reviews as well and compare the conclusions 👍👍
Maybe the heating system is eating up lots of energy without being able to deliver it to the cabin? I would not expect wonders at 20 degrees Celsius, but the consumption should indeed be significantly lower: Less air density, but not too hot, no need to run cooling systems at maximum power.
Ouch, looks like the Fisker is in a race with the Kia EV9 for the least efficient EV on Bjorn's chart.
Good Test, but i think the EV9 its the better Car and there you have service in the Future.
Would be nice and helpful to see the amount of charging stops in the spreed sheet. Fewer stops is far more important for me instead being 10 min faster
2 stops if not rushing on the road and to fill full batteries I would say for you the answer is
I absolutely LOVE the Fisker Ocean, it puts the Model Y to shame…..
Really ? Model Y most sold car, Fisker bankrupt. How do you define shame?
have you driven one to compare comfort and ride?@@moestrei
I enjoy all your videos, Bjørn. I have a 2023 Model 3 LFP with 24000km, I drove down to 3% to test battery degradation and worked out less than 1kWh loss since September. Wifey insisted on coming along with me - she is also 38 weeks pregnant 😊
❤❤❤
I think if you did this test in ~10-15c weather, you'd get to the 300Wh/Km range, which over 1000Km, which should be ~one less charging stop. This would save ~15-20m off or your 1000Km time, so definitely a good road tripper, even if consumption is a bit on the bad side.
Like you said though, I think the design of the car, while it looks great, has a huge impact on consumption.
Nice to tune in been long time😮
Baby number two on the way?!? No wonder the house update. Glad to hear things going well.
Get one yesterday and sell my model 3 performance, a lot to like in this car, think ...it has such luxery item as rain sensor !
🙈💩😂
Fisker, unfortunately, released the ocean to early on the streets. Customers become in fact alpha testing, not even beta testing. This, combined with the current Financial situation will come to a bad end, I assume. That‘s sad, because the ocean looks really nice and the huge battery could have been a perfect Match, if it would be more efficient.
Fisker.... FSRN charging Up 57 % Today. Numerous awards won by the Ocean SUV EV in Europe. Hopefully the Ronin, Pear and Alaska Pick-up are now in the creation pipeline with so much interest to purchase the company Fisker. Thumbs up video/ comments. Thanks.
It will go bankrupt
Its a meme stock now. It will go up and down whilst the gamblers (like you) gamble.
@@iaintdonknow The FSRN investors will continue to make Gains while Fisker continues to receive offers. Leading the EV sector in April.
Is it too risky to buy one right now? I'm scared.
The short answer is yes. Unless you are an EV technician yourself, or know one you could go to if something breaks since it will have no support over time when it starts to break or glitch.
With all the automakers trying to buy Fisker ?...4 as of Thursday.
At the current price, almost half 25k off, I'd say go for it. Unfortunately, we don't have a Fisker location in Canada. There's one Ocean One up for sale, but that trim isn't being reduced, yet and it's by a private seller. So, highly doubt they'd sell for less than the 90+k asking.
If risk is not your thing, avoid, avoid, avoid.
@@2023gainer Just because there are four automakers trying to buy Fisker, that doesn't mean the Fisker name will continue to exist, or that there will be support for the car in the future. These other companies might just be looking to integrate Fisker's assets - skilled employees, knowledge, etc. - into their own existing business, while ditching the Fisker brand and cars altogether. That is very often what happens with buy-ups like these.
Thanks for doing this. Such potential for the SUV and in my own opinion, way better looking than a Model Y. If only Henrik and Geeta weren't in charge, they'd prob be a success. He is a great designer but cut too many corners and not a good manager.
Spending 230Wh/km instead of 350Wh/km would save more than 45min on 1000 km.
But you would lose 3.5 hours of driving time because you have to drive really slow...
@@bjornnyland i thought about another car eg. ID4 and first leg with 300km should be possible
You own restaurants?
No
Stating 707km and then just driving for ~320km... That's silly.
WLTP is mostly low speed driving under nice conditions in the laboratory.
375Wh/km is a bit absurd.
There should be e "minimum efficiency" standard to be able to sell in Europe.
Over here at least, if you buy a large displacement ICE car you get a nice massive bill in taxes to pay, but there is no penalty if you buy this brick on wheels.
It makes no sense.
Hyundai & Tesla had the correct approach, build a family car with decent range and very good efficiency. You don't need massive expensive batteries to get decent range.
Check the result table at 30:51 - the average consumption is 348 Wh/km - it’s not the worst consumption, and the 10h15m time is quite good. The Ocean needs some software and hardware optimizations to improve the efficiency and to lower the energy consumption. Let’s hope there is an investor to make this possible for the current Ocean and a next generation car.
@@ziggyyoits extreme awd i bet the rwd or fwd version is much efficient even with that bad software
@@ziggyyo The time is decent because they put in a massive and heavy battery. If the car was aerodynamically efficient they could get away with a smaller capacity battery and therefore cost. This is why they are going bankrupt.
@@verygoodbrother yeah the car it self was big and wide so will be inefficient but they have stable charging curve and bigger battery
i think its better to watch previous reviews... just add to the general conversation... plus those reviewers will probably never do a second take or a comeback but later reviews can function as such
Not a good PR video- 370Wh/ km is outrageous! I know Fisker says it’s more a town car but this means you cannot use it for anything else.
@@thatwasonce But the model 3 achieves 205Wh/km ...
i think this test shows its good for long trips. I would not like to drive it in cities, its fairly wide.
*377 Wh/km
However just about twice as expensive to drive…
We drove our model S at 130 km/h through Germany at 250Wh/ km.
Really is sad this is probably going bye bye.
Guys, Fisker expects to be bankrupt within the next 30 days unfortunately
Wrong, Fisker already has 4 Buyout offers just days after filing 2023 10- K financials. We are enjoying the Gains from Dip-buying.
@@2023gainer Not four offers, four companies looking into the books.
they will back bro but with new money
They will go bankrupt. The production company Magna has already stopped production and fired more than 500 workers. There is no way back
@@Fry3199 Lol... Someone missing the Gains from the top EV stock in April.?
The consumption must be a fault or something
It is not easy to build a highly efficient BEV, let alone an SUV. Further optimization or even overall redesign necessary.
Take a look at Bjørn’s results table at 30:51 and compare the data with the competitors, for example Kia EV9.
Fisker might need to identify the energy hungry components and maybe replace them with more efficient ones.
@@ziggyyoThe ev9 is huge though.
A very clever car very poorly executed, no wonder they're no more. Shame.
Another electric shit !! 🤣😂
Pointless- Fisker will be bankrupt very soon.
4 OEMs have signed NDAs and in DD stage to acquire Fisker. 3 weeks to see how much financing or other offers occur. No BK was ever going to happen to such a superior product line.
@@2023gainerno company ever goes bankrupt if you don't want it to go bankrupt?
@@2023gainerlol. 4 manufacturers looking to pick at the carcass.
@@wizzyno1566 Fisker puts more EVs on the road daily and cleans the air you breathe, over 6,400 and growing.
@@iaintdonknow It has put one of the Safest and attractive, affordable EV products on the roads, set new 1st calendar year EV production record, won numerous awards with Zero Recalls. The Facts defeat the haters all day long
I hope you don’t break down ever.
Maybe Musk should sell Xitter. And buy Fisker and put in Tesla engineering with Fisker styling.
That's not gonna happen for sure. Especially if you know the history behind Fisker and Tesla.
MORE TEST WITH KIDS !
Have you already seen the video „picking up wifey‘s parents“ with the Fisker at the airport?
th-cam.com/video/v24Nik7-LyY/w-d-xo.html
Why do you review a car from a company that is almost out of business. This is a vast of your time, isn't it?
It's not waste of time. I get lots of views. More money to me.
❤❤❤