Cliffe Educates Man On Evolution (Proves God’s Existence)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 24 เม.ย. 2024
  • Join Cliffe, a devout Christian, as he engages in a spirited debate with an atheist on the topics of evolution and the origin of life. Watch as they delve into the complexities of science and faith, exploring different perspectives and seeking understanding. Gain insights into the ongoing dialogue between faith and reason in this thought-provoking exchange of ideas. Leave a comment on the content you’d like to see in the future! #cliffeknechtle #Jesus

ความคิดเห็น • 619

  • @heethanthen
    @heethanthen 16 วันที่ผ่านมา +19

    Cliffe is one giant walking argument from incredulity

    • @burntgod7165
      @burntgod7165 15 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

      He really does roll out the fallacies. He never responds directly to questions in this chaotic platform, just hurls inane questions and statements back. But I've seen him utterly embarrassed in a conversation with Matt Dillahunty, where was was forced to answer directly, and wasn't allowed to obfuscate and spout nonsense. Of course, that's what he did, but it was more exposing

    • @arcguardian
      @arcguardian 14 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      Not really, but it's clear u disagree with him.

    • @justingary5322
      @justingary5322 10 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      Sometimes. Cliffe Knechtle's not very knowledgeable on evolutionary biology but I understand his point about the origins of Life.
      I was raised Christian but I became an agnostic and atheist at 17-19 years old until I started studying religious beliefs, Christianity and Apologetics Happy Pentecost season brothers, sisters and everyone else He's Alive forevermore AMEN 🙏 ❤️ 👏. This has nothing and everything to do with the video but please listen if you want to otherwise leave it alone and ignore it. Hello my name is Justin and I'm a fellow Christian and Apologist but I'm also a college graduate. I'm not a closed minded Theist as I have nothing against Atheists or unbelievers as I speak to them often to understand their reasons for unbelief but we as Christians are convinced of God's Existence due to many real factors). I'm not trying to convert anyone or convince anyone to become Christians as that's The Holy Spirit's job to help people believe but only explain why I believe in Jesus Christ. There's actually evidence of God's Existence in Christianity. First of all there's proof that Jesus of Nazareth existed in history since the writings of Tacitus, Josephus Flavius, Pliny the younger and other historical documents prove that He was living two thousand years ago that even scholars both religious and Atheists agree with historically speaking but not that He's The Divine Son of God because obviously they don't.
      I'm going to give you historical and archeological evidence for God's Existence as The Scriptures have prophecies that predate the events recorded in them by several millennia including Matthew, Hosea and Zechariah which prophesy accurately of the people of Israel becoming a nation again after over 1900 years of being scattered around the nations since the destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem in 70 A.D. spoken of by Christ in Matthew 23:29-24:3 and returning to their homeland after The Holocaust with Jerusalem as their capital in 1948 exactly as Jesus The Christ said. The prophets including Daniel spoke of the time where several world empires would arise and fall including the Babylonian kingdom, Medes and Persians, Roman Empire, and Saladin and the Muslims which went in consecutive order for the past few millennia. The people of Israel becoming a nation after The Holocaust in 1948 (ironically the melting point of gold as God compares Israel to gold that's tested in fire in Zechariah 13:8 and Jeremiah 16:15) exactly how Jesus The Christ said would happen since God us everything to come in The Scriptures and not just because people were working towards as Atheists claim which are impossible for any regular man to predict.
      Just before anyone says Christianity is a white man's religion made to oppress blacks during slavery you obviously aren't aware that the first Christians were Jews in The Middle East and that Christianity just like any religion can be used by evil and corrupt people to oppress others but you forget that the first Abolitionists/Civil Rights activists were Christians who sought to abolish slavery, racism, segregation, injustice and prejudice throughout American history. Jesus The Christ loves you enough not to give you what we all deserve which is God's Wrath by His Own Blood. Charles Darwin didn't originally come up with The Theory of Evolution over 200 years ago as it is mentioned in the writings of Ancient Greeks who believed in Demons that gave knowledge to philosophers.
      Evolution makes no sense when nothing has evolved after thousands of years of human history and supposedly the first creature came from primordial sludge several millions of years
      ago funny how they won't believe that God an Eternal Almighty Spirit Being created us from the Earth) which came from a supermassive expansion of matter at high temperature that inexplicably created everything in the known universe that supposedly came from nothing billions of years ago. How did the organs evolve before there were bones, skin, substance and how did any creatures see before eyes evolved? I've studied evolution and abiogenesis in the past and read Darwin's " Origin of The Species" and I'm not convinced of macro Evolutionary biology whereas I accept micro Evolution like speciation and adaptation but not macro Evolution because there's no evidence of it nor clear observable examples of it where living creatures evolve into other kinds of species plus the fact that fossils don't show evidence of evolution and genetic entropy rules out evolution. The question begs how did two genders evolve from a common ancestor with a perfectly hospitable and sustainable environment with breathable oxygen and resources to survive on inexplicably? Atheists have the burden of proof to explain how everything came to be and why our existence is possible without the Existence of God from an godless perspective just as Christians have to provide evidence of God's Existence and the validity of His Word.
      Evolution requires life to already exist in order to take any effect in living organisms so it doesn't account for the existence of Life and reality. Also evolution is impossible because it goes against The Law of entropy and the second Law of thermodynamics because evolution makes things better whereas nothing continues to get better but decays and turns to absolute destruction in the end. Mark Ridley an Evolutionist said "No evolutionist whether gradualist or punctuationist uses the fossil record as evidence in favor of The Theory of Darwinian Evolution as opposed to special Creation". God's Existence is made perfectly known and observable in the universe as demonstrated in His Handiwork in the intelligently designed manner that Creation was made, human consciences and consciousness historical and archaeological evidence of God's Word being valid history, fulfillment of Bible Prophecies God in His Holiness and Righteousness could give us what we deserve in Hell for our since but He's merciful to give us free will to choose to accept or reject His gift of salvation by grace through faith in His Son Jesus. I don't mean this is any condescending manner but if you'd like to discuss The Scriptures with me or have me listen to your view on anything my instagram account is Savage Christian Kombatant

    • @burntgod7165
      @burntgod7165 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @justingary5322 I am not going to deal with all of that, but I will expose your fraudulence with regards the Ridley quote. You have ransacked that cherry-picked segmemt from a disingenuous creationist website. Here is it in full, however, with the bits creationists didn't want you to see since it doesn't help them:
      "Someone is getting it wrong, and it isn't Darwin; it is the creationists and the media.
      "In any case, no real evolutionist, whether gradualist or punctuationist, uses the fossil record as evidence in favor of evolution as opposed to special creation. The does not mean that the theory of evolution is unproven.
      "So what is the evidence that species have evolved? There have traditionally been three kinds of evidence, and it is these, not the "fossil evidence", that the critics should be thinking about. The three arguments are from the observed evolution of species, from biogeography, and from the hierarchical structure of taxonomy.
      "These three are the clearest arguments for the mutability of species. Other defences of the theory of evolution could be made, not the least of which is the absence of a coherent alternative. Darwin's theory is also uniquely able to account for both the presence of design, and the absence of design (vestigial organs), in nature." - Mark Ridley
      Sad that you have fallen for creationist misinformation and dishonest editing. But it's what happens when turn to faith and abandon fact. Based on that alone, one must doubt everything you said.

    • @burntgod7165
      @burntgod7165 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @justingary5322 Shame you chose to ransack and cherry pick Ridley's quote, probably from some dishonest creationist source. Here is the actual Ridley quote, in full, and it really doesn't help you:
      "Someone is getting it wrong, and it isn't Darwin; it is the creationists and the media. In any case, no real evolutionist, whether gradualist or punctuationist, uses the fossil record as evidence in favor of evolution as opposed to special creation. The does not mean that the theory of evolution is unproven. So what is the evidence that species have evolved? There have traditionally been three kinds of evidence, and it is these, not the 'fossil evidence', that the critics should be thinking about. The three arguments are from the observed evolution of species, from biogeography, and from the hierarchical structure of taxonomy. These three are the clearest arguments for the mutability of species. Other defences of the theory of evolution could be made, not the least of which is the absence of a coherent alternative. Darwin's theory is also uniquely able to account for both the presence of design, and the absence of design (vestigial organs), in nature."
      So try to use genuine sources in future, or people are liable to mistrust everything you say.

  • @enockjamesmwansa6071
    @enockjamesmwansa6071 11 วันที่ผ่านมา +6

    One day I shall stand and speak this boldly like Cliffe. I love him. 🥰🥰👌🏾

    • @louiscyfer6944
      @louiscyfer6944 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      you wanna sound like an idiot too?

  • @AtamMardes
    @AtamMardes 16 วันที่ผ่านมา +42

    "Religion began when the first scoundrel met the first fool." --- Voltaire

    • @Loading....99.99
      @Loading....99.99 16 วันที่ผ่านมา +13

      The fool says in his heart, “There is no God.”
      They are corrupt, they do abominable deeds; there is none who does good.
      -- Psalm 14:1

    • @veridicusmaximus6010
      @veridicusmaximus6010 16 วันที่ผ่านมา +18

      @@Loading....99.99 That's not even what it means. It is really saying No to God's authority or more likely that god is not concerned with the immorality that exist - he is no where to be found to render justice. It is not a statement about existence. Hardly any and more like ZERO ANE person was an atheist.

    • @Loading....99.99
      @Loading....99.99 16 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      @@veridicusmaximus6010 I never said the verse is referring to the none existence of God.
      It is said that Voltaire had theistic beliefs.

    • @veridicusmaximus6010
      @veridicusmaximus6010 16 วันที่ผ่านมา +18

      @@Loading....99.99 Oh, forgive me for thinking that a video that has in the title "Proves Gods Existence" and a comment about a fool by Voltaire and your subsequent verse implying that a fool is one who says there is no god had something to do with his existence. So, if not what does this verse have to do with Voltaire's comment?

    • @RobertSmith-gx3mi
      @RobertSmith-gx3mi 15 วันที่ผ่านมา +20

      You never get something from nothing.Says a man who believes a character from a book spoke things into existence.

  • @JuanManuel-ep8do
    @JuanManuel-ep8do 15 วันที่ผ่านมา +16

    Cliffe likes to debate people who are not prepared. Maybe he should remember when Matt Dillahunty destroyed him.

    • @omgitsatree4503
      @omgitsatree4503 14 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

      dillamonkey has been destroyed many times

    • @JuanManuel-ep8do
      @JuanManuel-ep8do 14 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      @@omgitsatree4503 not by Cliffe

    • @ndibunwapeter9013
      @ndibunwapeter9013 13 วันที่ผ่านมา

      ​@@omgitsatree4503 lol

    • @justingary5322
      @justingary5322 10 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Matt Dillahunty got OWNED by Andrew Wilson recently 😂. Cliffe Knechtle's not very knowledgeable on evolutionary biology but I understand his point about the origins of Life.
      I was raised Christian but I became an agnostic and atheist at 17-19 years old until I started studying religious beliefs, Christianity and Apologetics Happy Pentecost season brothers, sisters and everyone else He's Alive forevermore AMEN 🙏 ❤️ 👏. This has nothing and everything to do with the video but please listen if you want to otherwise leave it alone and ignore it. Hello my name is Justin and I'm a fellow Christian and Apologist but I'm also a college graduate. I'm not a closed minded Theist as I have nothing against Atheists or unbelievers as I speak to them often to understand their reasons for unbelief but we as Christians are convinced of God's Existence due to many real factors). I'm not trying to convert anyone or convince anyone to become Christians as that's The Holy Spirit's job to help people believe but only explain why I believe in Jesus Christ. There's actually evidence of God's Existence in Christianity. First of all there's proof that Jesus of Nazareth existed in history since the writings of Tacitus, Josephus Flavius, Pliny the younger and other historical documents prove that He was living two thousand years ago that even scholars both religious and Atheists agree with historically speaking but not that He's The Divine Son of God because obviously they don't.
      I'm going to give you historical and archeological evidence for God's Existence as The Scriptures have prophecies that predate the events recorded in them by several millennia including Matthew, Hosea and Zechariah which prophesy accurately of the people of Israel becoming a nation again after over 1900 years of being scattered around the nations since the destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem in 70 A.D. spoken of by Christ in Matthew 23:29-24:3 and returning to their homeland after The Holocaust with Jerusalem as their capital in 1948 exactly as Jesus The Christ said. The prophets including Daniel spoke of the time where several world empires would arise and fall including the Babylonian kingdom, Medes and Persians, Roman Empire, and Saladin and the Muslims which went in consecutive order for the past few millennia. The people of Israel becoming a nation after The Holocaust in 1948 (ironically the melting point of gold as God compares Israel to gold that's tested in fire in Zechariah 13:8 and Jeremiah 16:15) exactly how Jesus The Christ said would happen since God us everything to come in The Scriptures and not just because people were working towards as Atheists claim which are impossible for any regular man to predict.
      Just before anyone says Christianity is a white man's religion made to oppress blacks during slavery you obviously aren't aware that the first Christians were Jews in The Middle East and that Christianity just like any religion can be used by evil and corrupt people to oppress others but you forget that the first Abolitionists/Civil Rights activists were Christians who sought to abolish slavery, racism, segregation, injustice and prejudice throughout American history. Jesus The Christ loves you enough not to give you what we all deserve which is God's Wrath by His Own Blood. Charles Darwin didn't originally come up with The Theory of Evolution over 200 years ago as it is mentioned in the writings of Ancient Greeks who believed in Demons that gave knowledge to philosophers.
      Evolution makes no sense when nothing has evolved after thousands of years of human history and supposedly the first creature came from primordial sludge several millions of years
      ago funny how they won't believe that God an Eternal Almighty Spirit Being created us from the Earth) which came from a supermassive expansion of matter at high temperature that inexplicably created everything in the known universe that supposedly came from nothing billions of years ago. How did the organs evolve before there were bones, skin, substance and how did any creatures see before eyes evolved? I've studied evolution and abiogenesis in the past and read Darwin's " Origin of The Species" and I'm not convinced of macro Evolutionary biology whereas I accept micro Evolution like speciation and adaptation but not macro Evolution because there's no evidence of it nor clear observable examples of it where living creatures evolve into other kinds of species plus the fact that fossils don't show evidence of evolution and genetic entropy rules out evolution. The question begs how did two genders evolve from a common ancestor with a perfectly hospitable and sustainable environment with breathable oxygen and resources to survive on inexplicably? Atheists have the burden of proof to explain how everything came to be and why our existence is possible without the Existence of God from an godless perspective just as Christians have to provide evidence of God's Existence and the validity of His Word.
      Evolution requires life to already exist in order to take any effect in living organisms so it doesn't account for the existence of Life and reality. Also evolution is impossible because it goes against The Law of entropy and the second Law of thermodynamics because evolution makes things better whereas nothing continues to get better but decays and turns to absolute destruction in the end. Mark Ridley an Evolutionist said "No evolutionist whether gradualist or punctuationist uses the fossil record as evidence in favor of The Theory of Darwinian Evolution as opposed to special Creation". God's Existence is made perfectly known and observable in the universe as demonstrated in His Handiwork in the intelligently designed manner that Creation was made, human consciences and consciousness historical and archaeological evidence of God's Word being valid history, fulfillment of Bible Prophecies God in His Holiness and Righteousness could give us what we deserve in Hell for our since but He's merciful to give us free will to choose to accept or reject His gift of salvation by grace through faith in His Son Jesus. I don't mean this is any condescending manner but if you'd like to discuss The Scriptures with me or have me listen to your view on anything my instagram account is Savage Christian Kombatant

    • @enockjamesmwansa6071
      @enockjamesmwansa6071 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@justingary5322
      How do I copy your comment? I would like to share it.

  • @BerishaFatian
    @BerishaFatian 19 วันที่ผ่านมา +14

    Cliffe explained that God makes sense of our reality, and all that students did was offered a bunch of possibilites that he couldn't explain.
    He was rejecting God just to reject God. as do all atheists.

    • @Loading....99.99
      @Loading....99.99 18 วันที่ผ่านมา

      It's amazing how atheists try to use nonsense to make sense out of nonsense which is pure nonsense!

    • @thatguyrich9822
      @thatguyrich9822 17 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Atheist here.... not sure what you mean by "reject god just to reject god."

    • @BerishaFatian
      @BerishaFatian 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@thatguyrich9822
      Meaning that atheists generally hate God, despite the fact that they reject his existence.

    • @veridicusmaximus6010
      @veridicusmaximus6010 16 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

      "God" is an assertion not an explanation.

    • @Loading....99.99
      @Loading....99.99 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@veridicusmaximus6010 it's the best explanation from a rational viewpoint.

  • @nativeatheist6422
    @nativeatheist6422 14 วันที่ผ่านมา +8

    Cliff couldn't debate his way out of a brown paper bag.

    • @mozzarellatherat9687
      @mozzarellatherat9687 13 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Didn’t you watch the video?

    • @nativeatheist6422
      @nativeatheist6422 13 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      @@mozzarellatherat9687
      Yes he's "debating" school kids and using old debunked arguments. Have you seen him with real debaters like Dillahunty and Aron Ra? He got his ass handed to him.🤷🏽

    • @ndibunwapeter9013
      @ndibunwapeter9013 13 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      ​@@nativeatheist6422 well, what exactly are these ''old debunked arguments'' 😒

    • @nativeatheist6422
      @nativeatheist6422 13 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      @@ndibunwapeter9013
      The evolution of the eye. Michael Behe tried this argument about a decade ago. So many science books about the evolution of the eye were piled in front of him that you couldn't see his little face. Regarding philosophical nothing, we don't have an example of philosophical nothing to study so we can't know what could happen. Cliff just makes a god-of-the-gaps argument.

    • @ndibunwapeter9013
      @ndibunwapeter9013 13 วันที่ผ่านมา +4

      ​@@nativeatheist6422 so how are they debunked when there is no proven answer with substantial evidence.

  • @nummern
    @nummern 19 วันที่ผ่านมา +12

    That guy just spoke for 8 minutes without saying anything; no convincing arguments. Fun fact: you can be a Christian/religious person/believe in God and also believe in evolution theory.

    • @user-ej6bq2mw4v
      @user-ej6bq2mw4v 19 วันที่ผ่านมา

      How? Romans 5:12 is clear that death did not enter the world until Adam sinned. Evolution requires death. If you don’t believe the entire Bible is true are you really a Christian?

    • @FaithThreads
      @FaithThreads  19 วันที่ผ่านมา +5

      True

    • @paulthompson9668
      @paulthompson9668 19 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      @@FaithThreads Cliffe = argument from incredulity
      This argument is thousands of years old, and it has long been debunked.

    • @benliftin4awhile
      @benliftin4awhile 19 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      Amen, and the Big Bang as well, read on Dr. Hugh Ross, he’s amazing at making these things understandable.

    • @Loading....99.99
      @Loading....99.99 18 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      @A-hh6mg your faith in Matt is astounding.

  • @AtamMardes
    @AtamMardes 16 วันที่ผ่านมา +14

    Only fools believe and consider as sacred the supernatural fairy tales, fictions, and myths just because a book claims itself to be the holy truth.

    • @DecadesRemain
      @DecadesRemain 16 วันที่ผ่านมา +4

      Why would we be fools? What if it was true? Would you be willing to suffer the consequences of being the real fool? Because again, it's not just a book that we believe in, it also happens in the real world, there have already been biblical prophecies being fulfilled, and no one is talking about it, because the world is against God.

    • @tomyossarian7681
      @tomyossarian7681 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@DecadesRemain What if some other god is true? Wouldn’t you want to know which one? Would you be willing to suffer the consequences of being the real fool?
      Luckily, you got born and/or indoctrinated into just the right one, eh? What are the chances of that.. 🤭

    • @ndibunwapeter9013
      @ndibunwapeter9013 13 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Isaac Newton
      Robert Boyle
      Galileo Galilei
      Johannes Kepler
      Gregor Mendel
      These are all famous scientists that had a great impact in our modern world and there were all theists, so by your definition there were all fools.

    • @AtamMardes
      @AtamMardes 13 วันที่ผ่านมา +12

      @@ndibunwapeter9013
      Yes, it is possible to be a scientist and still believe in religious fairy tales, fictions, and myths. Besides most of those people you mentioned had no idea about Darwinian evolution. Everyone was religious back then.

    • @AtamMardes
      @AtamMardes 13 วันที่ผ่านมา +12

      @@DecadesRemain
      Unfortunately you're not saying anything intelligent by thinking properly & honestly. You're only parroting the bs you've been indoctrinated with.

  • @par1206
    @par1206 10 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

    “Creative mechanism in evolution” - mutation

    • @user-zo4nk4uq7z
      @user-zo4nk4uq7z 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

      most mutants cause chaos and destruction you are wrong.

    • @veridicusmaximus6010
      @veridicusmaximus6010 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@user-zo4nk4uq7z No you are wrong - most are near neutral and neutral thus below the threshold of selection and will be maintained and isolated and mutate at the neutral rate. STOP acting like you know what you are talking about because you read Ray Comfort or some other moron.

    • @captaingaza2389
      @captaingaza2389 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@user-zo4nk4uq7z
      Nope
      Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles did lots of good
      Stop lying for jeebus

  • @justingary5322
    @justingary5322 10 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Cliffe Knechtle's not very knowledgeable on evolutionary biology but I understand his point about the origins of Life.
    I was raised Christian but I became an agnostic and atheist at 17-19 years old until I started studying religious beliefs, Christianity and Apologetics Happy Pentecost season brothers, sisters and everyone else He's Alive forevermore AMEN 🙏 ❤️ 👏. This has nothing and everything to do with the video but please listen if you want to otherwise leave it alone and ignore it. Hello my name is Justin and I'm a fellow Christian and Apologist but I'm also a college graduate. I'm not a closed minded Theist as I have nothing against Atheists or unbelievers as I speak to them often to understand their reasons for unbelief but we as Christians are convinced of God's Existence due to many real factors). I'm not trying to convert anyone or convince anyone to become Christians as that's The Holy Spirit's job to help people believe but only explain why I believe in Jesus Christ. There's actually evidence of God's Existence in Christianity. First of all there's proof that Jesus of Nazareth existed in history since the writings of Tacitus, Josephus Flavius, Pliny the younger and other historical documents prove that He was living two thousand years ago that even scholars both religious and Atheists agree with historically speaking but not that He's The Divine Son of God because obviously they don't.
    I'm going to give you historical and archeological evidence for God's Existence as The Scriptures have prophecies that predate the events recorded in them by several millennia including Matthew, Hosea and Zechariah which prophesy accurately of the people of Israel becoming a nation again after over 1900 years of being scattered around the nations since the destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem in 70 A.D. spoken of by Christ in Matthew 23:29-24:3 and returning to their homeland after The Holocaust with Jerusalem as their capital in 1948 exactly as Jesus The Christ said. The prophets including Daniel spoke of the time where several world empires would arise and fall including the Babylonian kingdom, Medes and Persians, Roman Empire, and Saladin and the Muslims which went in consecutive order for the past few millennia. The people of Israel becoming a nation after The Holocaust in 1948 (ironically the melting point of gold as God compares Israel to gold that's tested in fire in Zechariah 13:8 and Jeremiah 16:15) exactly how Jesus The Christ said would happen since God us everything to come in The Scriptures and not just because people were working towards as Atheists claim which are impossible for any regular man to predict.
    Just before anyone says Christianity is a white man's religion made to oppress blacks during slavery you obviously aren't aware that the first Christians were Jews in The Middle East and that Christianity just like any religion can be used by evil and corrupt people to oppress others but you forget that the first Abolitionists/Civil Rights activists were Christians who sought to abolish slavery, racism, segregation, injustice and prejudice throughout American history. Jesus The Christ loves you enough not to give you what we all deserve which is God's Wrath by His Own Blood. Charles Darwin didn't originally come up with The Theory of Evolution over 200 years ago as it is mentioned in the writings of Ancient Greeks who believed in Demons that gave knowledge to philosophers.
    Evolution makes no sense when nothing has evolved after thousands of years of human history and supposedly the first creature came from primordial sludge several millions of years
    ago funny how they won't believe that God an Eternal Almighty Spirit Being created us from the Earth) which came from a supermassive expansion of matter at high temperature that inexplicably created everything in the known universe that supposedly came from nothing billions of years ago. How did the organs evolve before there were bones, skin, substance and how did any creatures see before eyes evolved? I've studied evolution and abiogenesis in the past and read Darwin's " Origin of The Species" and I'm not convinced of macro Evolutionary biology whereas I accept micro Evolution like speciation and adaptation but not macro Evolution because there's no evidence of it nor clear observable examples of it where living creatures evolve into other kinds of species plus the fact that fossils don't show evidence of evolution and genetic entropy rules out evolution. The question begs how did two genders evolve from a common ancestor with a perfectly hospitable and sustainable environment with breathable oxygen and resources to survive on inexplicably? Atheists have the burden of proof to explain how everything came to be and why our existence is possible without the Existence of God from an godless perspective just as Christians have to provide evidence of God's Existence and the validity of His Word.
    Evolution requires life to already exist in order to take any effect in living organisms so it doesn't account for the existence of Life and reality. Also evolution is impossible because it goes against The Law of entropy and the second Law of thermodynamics because evolution makes things better whereas nothing continues to get better but decays and turns to absolute destruction in the end. Mark Ridley an Evolutionist said "No evolutionist whether gradualist or punctuationist uses the fossil record as evidence in favor of The Theory of Darwinian Evolution as opposed to special Creation". God's Existence is made perfectly known and observable in the universe as demonstrated in His Handiwork in the intelligently designed manner that Creation was made, human consciences and consciousness historical and archaeological evidence of God's Word being valid history, fulfillment of Bible Prophecies God in His Holiness and Righteousness could give us what we deserve in Hell for our since but He's merciful to give us free will to choose to accept or reject His gift of salvation by grace through faith in His Son Jesus. I don't mean this is any condescending manner but if you'd like to discuss The Scriptures with me or have me listen to your view on anything my instagram account is Savage Christian Kombatant

  • @FactStorm
    @FactStorm 10 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    Nobody is stupider than a religious person.

  • @mve6182
    @mve6182 19 วันที่ผ่านมา +6

    "It's impossible to get something from nothing". Allright, so where does God come from? Christian answer: "God always existed and doesn't come from anything". Allright, so it is possible that something (God) comes from nothing.....

    • @JiraiyaSama86
      @JiraiyaSama86 19 วันที่ผ่านมา +7

      That already shows that you don't understand who and what God is. God is the uncaused first cause. He has no beginning. He is eternal. He has no end. Therefore He doesn't come from anything. He always is.
      This is reasoned by understanding that we can't have an infinite number of causes. If we do, then that is an infinite regression, and there would be no beginning, and that would suggest that the universe is eternal. Meaning it always is. And if we're to go there, are you also going to ask where the universe came from, just to be consistent?
      Logically, the alternative to the infinite regression presented is that there is a point where we can stop. But that point would have to be an uncaused first cause. In order for it to be uncaused, it must not have a beginning. It would always have to be there. God fits that description. Not Zeus, Thor, and all the man-made pagan deities.

    • @Loading....99.99
      @Loading....99.99 18 วันที่ผ่านมา +4

      If anyone told you that God came from 'nothing' is plain wrong. The bible never said that. The bible clearly states that God is from everlasting to everlasting (Psalm 90:2)

    • @tomyossarian7681
      @tomyossarian7681 17 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

      @@JiraiyaSama86 Which god fits the description of the first uncaused cause and how do you know that? Furthermore, what makes you think that universe itself cannot be the first uncaused cause?

    • @JiraiyaSama86
      @JiraiyaSama86 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@tomyossarian7681 The God of the Bible. The short version is that the evidence seems to point to Him due to the reliability of Jesus, and Jesus affirms the accounts from Genesis.
      The order and appearance of design all around, combined with experience points to a mind. The more specific and orderly things are, the more it points to a mind. It is highly improbable for such order to arise from randomness.
      Also. I don't care to convince you. That's something you have to decide for yourself.

    • @tomyossarian7681
      @tomyossarian7681 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@JiraiyaSama86 How come God of the Bible fits that description? Where is description of the god of the bible that says it is "first uncaused cause"?
      "Furthermore, what makes you think that universe itself cannot be the first uncaused cause?"
      I don't care for you to convince me either. I am just wondering how you convinced yourself, and so far I see only a standard christian moron trying not to think as hard as possible.

  • @thatguyrich9822
    @thatguyrich9822 17 วันที่ผ่านมา +17

    1) The only people who believe that something came from nothing are theists. They believe god spoke, and everything came from nothing.
    2) I see nothing in this video that proves god's existence.

    • @chmurny_typ
      @chmurny_typ 16 วันที่ผ่านมา +6

      1) God is not "nothing", God is "somebody", a being with intelligent mind. He's eternal, all-powerful and all-knowing. The evidence that Cliffe adresses is "something doesn't come from nothing" can also be rephrased as "everything that has a beginning, has a cause". Our universe has a beginning, The Big Bang, therefore there has to be a cause for all matter that turned into singularity and exploded. But that's where most athiests hit a dead end. Even Albert Einstein struggled with this question, which caused him eventually to turn from pantheism to theism, because there has to be uncaused cause, meaning God, who made our universe.
      2) That's where i agree with you, the title of this video is a bit wrong, but here's one thing - Cliffe doesn't try to "prove" God. Nobody can "prove" or "disprove" God. To prove means to show that something can't be the other way around. So there can't be proof that God exists and there's also no proof that God doesn't exist. Cliffe presents evidence, not proof, but evidence, that support the existence of God and the fact that he created us.
      Hope that helps, Jesus loves you!

    • @user-fd1gf6yc5j
      @user-fd1gf6yc5j 16 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Serious question
      Once you answer it with evidence I promise you proof of the supernatural
      Deal?
      Prove in a scientific, demonstrable way the colour of the musical note C
      If you can't you have lost and will be known as a weak human being

    • @tomyossarian7681
      @tomyossarian7681 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@user-fd1gf6yc5j You demonstrated in a real, scientific way, the depth of your own stupidity. Congrats! You can continue believing any crap you want with no evidence whatsoever.

    • @thatguyrich9822
      @thatguyrich9822 16 วันที่ผ่านมา +5

      @@chmurny_typ But therein lies the biggest theistic problem. The claim is that everything that has a beginning has a cause. You'll need to show evidence that the universe has a beginning. And show evidence that god doesn't have a beginning. Moreover, please show evidence that god is somebody.

    • @thatguyrich9822
      @thatguyrich9822 16 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      @@user-fd1gf6yc5j 1) The musical note C has a wavelength of 16.35 Hz (at Octave 0.) The visible light spectrum range is 1014 Hz to 1015 Hz. This means the wavelength of the musical note C is too low for us to see. Our eyes are incapable of seeing it. Therefore, we won't see the color of musical note C.
      2) Your question is a non sequitur. I'd argue that you'd have show evidence that the musical note C even has a color.

  • @user-zo4nk4uq7z
    @user-zo4nk4uq7z 9 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    This Atheist said, 'imagine there is a molecule that can replicate'.............That is circular reasoning because you can't have replication without evolution and yet you can't have evolution without replication. What a contradiction.

    • @nagranoth_
      @nagranoth_ 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

      That's a really dumb comment. Obviously you can have replication without evolution. There's self replicating molecules all over the place, and they aren't alive. It's just chemistry. (granted, life i just chemistry as well, but a specific subgroup that is the result of self replication already happening anyway)

    • @fortunatecookie9055
      @fortunatecookie9055 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@nagranoth_ Evolution explains Homology. Homology explains Evolution. It is circular reasoning. Deny, deny, deny...

    • @roadrunner694
      @roadrunner694 5 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

      It's amazing how blind these young people are.

  • @lchua4319
    @lchua4319 16 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

    It takes a lot of faith to be an atheist

    • @topcat8804
      @topcat8804 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Faith in reality

    • @danpaulson927
      @danpaulson927 16 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      It takes ignorance to believe in supernatural.

    • @lchua4319
      @lchua4319 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

      So you believe that everything came from nothing? Sure

    • @danpaulson927
      @danpaulson927 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@lchua4319 Actually, that's what you just brought to the table. We are known by our what?
      Why do you think it came from nothing?

    • @lchua4319
      @lchua4319 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@danpaulson927 We are known by our what?

  • @johnnyjoedillinger5254
    @johnnyjoedillinger5254 14 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    You'd think if God wanted this man to preach his gospel he would have let him evolve a better speaking voice.

    • @roscowbrown3937
      @roscowbrown3937 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

      nah, because that would just be proof of evolution, lol, and Cliff can’t have that

  • @ArchibaldRoon
    @ArchibaldRoon 19 วันที่ผ่านมา +5

    Cliffe says a lot of incorrect things very convincingly.

    • @cgelly75
      @cgelly75 19 วันที่ผ่านมา +4

      Such as?

    • @criticalthinker8007
      @criticalthinker8007 19 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@cgelly75 Just as 'something from nothing' is the problem with the big bang. The ideas of something from nothing come straight from the bible it is not in the big bang model or any scientific model..

    • @Loading....99.99
      @Loading....99.99 19 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      Such as?

    • @ArchibaldRoon
      @ArchibaldRoon 19 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      The design argument is incorrect. It is an assumption based on his understanding of man-made things that have a purpose. And a misunderstanding of basic biology.
      The language argument (DNA is written or coded by a mind) is also incorrect.
      Postulating a coder/creator works well for his religious narrative, but scientists who study these things don’t suddenly convert to believing in God. They don’t have a “eureka” moment where they suddenly see God’s hand. I’m one of them, and it just does not happen.
      If you start with God you can see design. A very very flawed design.

    • @Loading....99.99
      @Loading....99.99 19 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

      @@ArchibaldRoon so what's your better assumption for the orderly way the universe was created than Cliffe's beliefs?

  • @user-zo4nk4uq7z
    @user-zo4nk4uq7z 9 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Ribosomes make all proteins so what made the first Ribosome which is made of protein. Answer that Atheists.

    • @nagranoth_
      @nagranoth_ 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

      that's a science question, you clown. It has nothing to do with atheism, and it's not up to atheists to answer your science questions. Ask a science teacher or a scientist.
      More than that, it's a question you can find the recent state of research for with a second of googling:
      "The ribosome may have first originated as a protoribosome, possibly containing a peptidyl transferase centre (PTC), in an RNA world, appearing as a self-replicating complex that only later evolved the ability to synthesize proteins when amino acids began to appear."
      How is it that you lot can never understand that just because something in biology works a certain way NOW, doesn't mean that's how it originated? While the one constant in biology is that life and it's processes have become more complex over time? How is it that you couldn't get to "maybe that's not how it originally worked" by yourself? How is it that you're too lazy to look up an answer yourself? It's because you don't want to get an answer, isn't it? You know how weak your position is, so you just throw out something you desperately hope is a gotcha if people don't pay too much attention, and sit there hoping no-one will respond.

    • @veridicusmaximus6010
      @veridicusmaximus6010 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I'll add to nagranoth's answer. Your question is a massive argument from ignorance. How is that you guys keep making the same mistakes is science and logic? We could absolutely know nothing about how life came to be so diversified on this planet and that still would not mean your disembodied sky wizard exists let alone created anything. Not knowing something is not an argument for your silly useful fictions!

    • @fortunatecookie9055
      @fortunatecookie9055 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      @@nagranoth_ It has EVERYTHING to do with atheism. Only God can create Life. Only a Design Engineer of the Highest Order can create the DNA strand of a Human Being. DNA is subtractive, not additive. Monkey plus dolphin will not equal human. Look all around you. You have eyes but do you not see? Science was created by Catholics to discern God's divine hand in nature - a mission that it continues to fulfill with new discoveries of wonderment each year. To attribute these fingerprints to random chance is to deny reality.

  • @willievanstraaten1960
    @willievanstraaten1960 13 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    But damn god came from nothing. So nothing can come from nothing.

    • @raymondgriffin9067
      @raymondgriffin9067 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Not true, God is eternal and was not created. On either side of time is only eternity.
      In the beginning (time created) God created the heavens (space) and the earth (matter). They all were brought into existence together.

    • @fortunatecookie9055
      @fortunatecookie9055 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Even Ancient Greece had a an edification for God, The Unmoved Mover, The Uncaused Cause, absent any statue on an empty base in the hall of Greek gods. St. Paul famously encountered such while bringing the Gospel to Athens.

    • @willievanstraaten1960
      @willievanstraaten1960 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@raymondgriffin9067 @raymondgriffin9067: “Not true, God is eternal and was not created”
      What a silly and foolish man-created god by ignorant ancient desert-dwellers to control the people with fear of this malicious celestial tyrant.
      He floats in nothing for billions and billions of years, for eternity and then 6,000 years ago he got a brilliant plan to create a universe, and in the universe, an insignificant speck of dust where he can create man in his image to rule as an evil and cruel tyrant, constantly punishing, killing and murdering people.
      Damn is this foolish or is it stupid.

    • @willievanstraaten1960
      @willievanstraaten1960 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@fortunatecookie9055 @fortunatecookie9055: “Even Ancient Greece had a an edification for God”
      Exactly, this proves that all gods were man-created in their ignorance to understand climate, weather, geology and the natural mechanics of nature.
      Now tell me how does your Greek edification, education, instructions, tuition, teaching, schooling and pedagogy prove that your cruel, evil and malevolent god is real?
      Typical superstitious senseless gibberish and trash talk.

  • @michaelvanniekerk2104
    @michaelvanniekerk2104 19 วันที่ผ่านมา +5

    Is it safe to say that Cliffe does support the idea of evolution, as well as the existence of God?

    • @francescovignolo8781
      @francescovignolo8781 19 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Pierre Theilard de Chardin conciliated evolution with cristian faith

    • @noelprez2895
      @noelprez2895 19 วันที่ผ่านมา +5

      Evolution does not explain the origin of life.

    • @criticalthinker8007
      @criticalthinker8007 19 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      it is safe to say that either Cliffe does not understand evolution and big bang cosmology or he is being deceitful. But are different but neither cosmology or the big bang make any claims about randomness or something from nothing.

    • @TheCrusadesWereAVibeLowkey
      @TheCrusadesWereAVibeLowkey 19 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      @@criticalthinker8007 what do you mean, you’re saying the Big Bang doesn’t claim that nothing caused everything?

    • @TheCrusadesWereAVibeLowkey
      @TheCrusadesWereAVibeLowkey 19 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      I don’t know how you wouldn’t support the idea of evolution, seems to clearly be a thing, at the same time evolution can’t create something from nothing so it doesn’t contradict his creationism

  • @brittzank8987
    @brittzank8987 14 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    Cliffes problem is his assertion that the world is designed. We know design by comparing to nature. What nature did he compare creation too? And he's assuming reality is order & design. It's pure assumption

    • @thelobsterking1055
      @thelobsterking1055 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Because if there is no capacity for order than we must live in a constant flux which is contradictory to human experience

    • @brittzank8987
      @brittzank8987 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @thelobsterking1055 1) what does living in Flux mean?
      2) how is that against the human experience?

    • @thelobsterking1055
      @thelobsterking1055 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@brittzank8987 1) Living in a state of constant change
      2) Human experience impossible without ability to know stuff and learn things. There is cannot be an ability for knowledge in a state of constant flux. There must be a stable physical and metaphysical foundation to reality.

    • @brittzank8987
      @brittzank8987 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @thelobsterking1055 depends on what you mean by "know" whether that statement is true. If u mean "know" as in 100% knowledge, we don't have that about anything.
      If u just mean "know" as in it appears to be true based on all evidence, that doesn't require anything other than reality. Like law of non-contradiction doesn't require an external force to be a thing.

    • @thelobsterking1055
      @thelobsterking1055 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@brittzank8987 reality itself is a metaphysical category. Tt depends on what foundation you grounding your reality. Where is the source of "real".

  • @philipcoates9185
    @philipcoates9185 16 วันที่ผ่านมา +8

    Cliffe...hasnt a clue......If he doesn't understand it, then it cant have happenned..about as knowledgeable as a 5th grader and thats why the video has ended early.

    • @user-zo4nk4uq7z
      @user-zo4nk4uq7z 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Something can not come from nothing, get over it.

    • @philipcoates9185
      @philipcoates9185 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

      ​@@user-zo4nk4uq7zshow me where anyone said that

    • @JeffMiller1984
      @JeffMiller1984 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      @@user-zo4nk4uq7z Except for God, right?

    • @philipcoates9185
      @philipcoates9185 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@user-zo4nk4uq7z Show me where any respectable scientist has ever said something came from nothing...and I dont mean someone with a degree in Psychology or divinity or bought their qualification from some non descript University like "Dr" Kent Hovind.

  • @John_Hoover
    @John_Hoover 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I feel like this video is being played on a loop…

  • @dansmith9724
    @dansmith9724 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

    ' I do not know', 🤣 that was funny.

  • @lovesickforone
    @lovesickforone 19 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    It must be true! The guy read it in a book! I read something on the Internet yesterday so I know that must be true too!

    • @Loading....99.99
      @Loading....99.99 19 วันที่ผ่านมา

      How do you know when something is true?

    • @ArchibaldRoon
      @ArchibaldRoon 18 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Peer reviewed evidence. Better than what Cliffe has to offer which is also from a book by the way.

    • @lovesickforone
      @lovesickforone 18 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@Loading....99.99 depends on the subject I think. You can't discover the truth of gravity in the same way that you could discover if someone you are in love with, returns your affections

    • @lovesickforone
      @lovesickforone 18 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      @@ArchibaldRoon actually it's a collection of 66 books, by over 40 authors.

    • @DecadesRemain
      @DecadesRemain 16 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      It's all laughs and giggles until the book starts predicting future events.

  • @Redeemer_80
    @Redeemer_80 18 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Look at how hard man has to work to “imagine” facts that disprove the existence of a creator. And that imagination they have, how do they explain that in their models?

    • @tomyossarian7681
      @tomyossarian7681 17 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      That which is asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence, wouldn't you agree?

    • @Redeemer_80
      @Redeemer_80 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@tomyossarian7681 no. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

    • @tomyossarian7681
      @tomyossarian7681 16 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      @@Redeemer_80 And i said... what?

    • @Redeemer_80
      @Redeemer_80 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@tomyossarian7681 I can help you by explaining it to you, but I can’t help you understand.

    • @tomyossarian7681
      @tomyossarian7681 16 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      @@Redeemer_80 You don't have to explain, I am asking you to read what I've said.and address THAT, instead of making up a straw man.

  • @cervboy
    @cervboy 15 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    Where did your silly god come from if something can't come from nothing.

    • @blur.vfx.
      @blur.vfx. 14 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Man it says multyple times in bible that god is eternal and that he doesnt have any beggining or end as jesus said "I AM"

    • @cervboy
      @cervboy 14 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      @@blur.vfx. I do not care what that piece of horrible trash book says. I am an adult.

    • @ndibunwapeter9013
      @ndibunwapeter9013 13 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      ​@@cervboy read what you said
      Did you make sense?

    • @ericscaillet2232
      @ericscaillet2232 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@cervboy maybe you can do better ,lets hear.

    • @cervboy
      @cervboy 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@ericscaillet2232 Anyone can do better .Just stop believing in such nonsense of there being some god in the sky. What makes you think that this clown thinks he knows there is an actual god and it's real. Pathetic in this day and age.

  • @user-br6px6ok9x
    @user-br6px6ok9x 19 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    How does he know there was nothing?

    • @Loading....99.99
      @Loading....99.99 19 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      If the universe (time, matter, space, particles.. everything) had a beginning, what was before the beginning

    • @thatguyrich9822
      @thatguyrich9822 17 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      @@Loading....99.99 The answer to that question is "I don't know." But just because I don't know doesn't mean you get to assert "god did it."

    • @Loading....99.99
      @Loading....99.99 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@thatguyrich9822 “A commonsense interpretation of the facts suggests that a superintellect has monkeyed with physics, as well as chemistry and biology, and that there are no blind forces worth speaking about in nature.” - Fred Hoyle

    • @thatguyrich9822
      @thatguyrich9822 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@Loading....99.99 Why would I care what Fred Hoyle has to say? His steady-state model is now rejected by cosmologists, astrophysicists, and astronomers. The observational evidence points to a hot Big Bang cosmology with a finite age of the universe.

    • @DecadesRemain
      @DecadesRemain 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

      ​​@@thatguyrich9822Now how are we asserting God into this, when he was the one who literally putted us into existence.

  • @mchooksis
    @mchooksis 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Cliffe simply cannot get his tiny head around difficult concepts so he just reverts to default " There has to be a god". He hides from having to answer questions by asking questions himself. It is a shame the guy in the white shirt gets trapped into always answering Cliff's questions rather than persisting in getting an answer from Cliffe to HIS questions.
    Cliffe also just makes statements to support his beliefs with no attempt to validate them. For instance " You cannot get design without an intelligence being involved" Of course you can. A function fitting a purpose does not necessarily have to be designed. The eye is a perfect example of this. We can see it wasn't designed, because we can see in the animal kingdom the gradual changes that led to the complex eye being formed, not created by design.

    • @benwolk2028
      @benwolk2028 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

      What I saw in this interview was the guy in the white shirt advancing theories for which he had no corroboration...conclusions in search of evidence.

    • @veridicusmaximus6010
      @veridicusmaximus6010 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@benwolk2028 And creationist like Cliffe don't do that - LMAO!

  • @binhanh296
    @binhanh296 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

    what if it's a billion years? Then please wait for a billion years to prove if it's true

  • @corkystorky
    @corkystorky 19 วันที่ผ่านมา +5

    Personally I don't believe in Big Bang because we know that every bang gets into all directions and the distribution is equal, and it's not true especially in the case of Earth where the periodic table of elements itself is not equally distributed elsewhere, plus the complexity of the systems: blood, nerve, breathing, thinking, etc, could not just come from a bang, but an elaborate design of a Creator.

    • @criticalthinker8007
      @criticalthinker8007 19 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      every bang does not go over evenly in every direction with equal distribution very rarely does that happen

    • @benliftin4awhile
      @benliftin4awhile 19 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      In areas of space, there isn’t matter evenly distributed. So your argument goes right out the window, even infinitely small and full of mass, it wouldn’t be equally distributed. In a real explosion that doesn’t even happen.

    • @daryladhityahenry
      @daryladhityahenry 18 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Actually... Big bang is the best clue that God exists if scientist want to see it... From nothing -> booomm -> earth appears?
      From nothing? Basically big bang is God creating our solar system from nothing. lol :D. So... They are right, but they just don't want to admit that the creation process is by God.

    • @burntgod7165
      @burntgod7165 16 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      It's very sad that you were so badly served by the American education system.

    • @marcuscook3852
      @marcuscook3852 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@burntgod7165 Does that actually exist?

  • @stephenkaake7016
    @stephenkaake7016 18 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    God is a hoodwink by the greater mind, I know this as I was trained by God for 6 months, God is like a program, I am not allowed to believe anymore, its like a killswitch was hit on me, my mind was given a boost, now I am not alone in my thoughts, I am also better than most people at pool, ping pong, juggling, my impressions and music went up as well

  • @VM-ut9fd
    @VM-ut9fd 19 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    I just waisted 8 minutes of my life🤦🏻‍♀️

    • @GOD1stykit
      @GOD1stykit 19 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      How so?!!

    • @user-br6px6ok9x
      @user-br6px6ok9x 19 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Your not the only one....he's another Ray Comfort

    • @Loading....99.99
      @Loading....99.99 19 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      How did you "waisted" 8 minutes of your life?

    • @GOD1stykit
      @GOD1stykit 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@user-br6px6ok9x no sir… what makes you say this??

    • @ericscaillet2232
      @ericscaillet2232 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@Loading....99.99 maybe its better than being knee deep

  • @georgea.lozano2619
    @georgea.lozano2619 19 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    something form nothing? how about the big bang. Creative mechanism in evolution? it is called adaptation. The older guy is crazy.

    • @noelprez2895
      @noelprez2895 19 วันที่ผ่านมา +8

      So everything came from nothing?

    • @aarononeill3
      @aarononeill3 19 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      The universe just randomly exploded into existence, from nothing (actual magic) , with all the laws of logic allowing for order and creative forces (coding of dna, cell memory). And now we're (humanity) pitted in a survival of the fittest race that ends in heat death... Who's narrative is crazy?

    • @cgelly75
      @cgelly75 19 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      @@noelprez2895 I’m befuddled by the spawning of material from immaterial ideology as well.

    • @Longshore79
      @Longshore79 19 วันที่ผ่านมา +4

      What caused the Big Bang ?

    • @Loading....99.99
      @Loading....99.99 18 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      But where did life come from?

  • @patrickegan5669
    @patrickegan5669 18 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

    It's magic -- I just appeared.

  • @andrewwright9960
    @andrewwright9960 19 วันที่ผ่านมา

    So what god created the universe? I am certainly sure it's not the one in the bible . That one is definitely man made.

    • @Loading....99.99
      @Loading....99.99 18 วันที่ผ่านมา +4

      You're full of confidence, so which one did?

    • @marcuscook3852
      @marcuscook3852 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@Loading....99.99 If you read his comment carefully he is making no claim that any god created the universe. He is asserting that the god of the Christian bible is certainly not responsible, and is asking those that believe that a god created the universe to declare which one did. I expect that, like me, he does not believe that any god was responsible.

    • @Loading....99.99
      @Loading....99.99 16 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      @@marcuscook3852 you're wrong, if you read his comment carefully he said 'i am certainly sure it's not the God in the bible' (as if it's possible that some other god did)
      He also pinpointed 'that one (God) in the bible is definitely man made' (which gives the impression that the others are not.
      And then he has no evidence to back up his claim.

    • @marcuscook3852
      @marcuscook3852 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@Loading....99.99 My comment stands. Andrew made no indication that any god created anything. It does not follow that Andrew deems it possible that "some other god" did anything, or that he acknowledges the existence of any god. You are just being obtuse - is it deliberate?

    • @DecadesRemain
      @DecadesRemain 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

      How are you gonna say God in the Bible is man-made? Certainly Jesus Christ isn't man-made, because he lived on this world before, and many people claimed he is God. Not only that, but his name holds power that we cannot understand from. It's showing how reliable the Bible truly is, it's even predicting future events!
      -----------------------
      Let me give you some infomation. The solar eclipse from 2024, goes through 7 cities named Nineveh, 7 year before that, was another solar eclipse in 2017, that goes through 7 cities named Salem, they both cross over the United States, forming an X on a place called "Little Egypt".
      So 7 cities named Salem, which means peace. And then 7 years later, goes through 7 cities named Nineveh. You got 7, 7, and 7. Put them together, you get "777", which is the number of perfection, literally meaning God.
      Not only that, but exactly three days before the solar eclipse of 2024, America got a very rare earthquake in New Jersey and New York. You know what else was 3 days? Jesus Christ's resurrection of the third day.
      It's all coming together, so much in fact, many non-believers are becoming concerned that these events are pointing towards God, specifically Jesus Christ, the one from the Bible.
      Meaning God in the Bible is not man-made, it's witnessed evidence in the world. People claimed to see God, they called him Jesus Christ.

  • @cervboy
    @cervboy 14 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    The idea of a thiest educating anybody on anything is a complete joke!

    • @ndibunwapeter9013
      @ndibunwapeter9013 13 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Why believe gravity since it was proposed by a theist 🤷‍♀️

    • @cervboy
      @cervboy 13 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      @@ndibunwapeter9013 Gravity can be proven!

    • @ndibunwapeter9013
      @ndibunwapeter9013 13 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      @@cervboy now you're just contradicting yourself 👍

    • @cervboy
      @cervboy 13 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@ndibunwapeter9013 In what way am I contradicting myself. And by the way if the theory of gravity was proposed by a thiest that does not mean a thing since almost everyone was suckered {indoctrinated] when they were poor young kids that didn't know any better. Child abuse!

    • @roscowbrown3937
      @roscowbrown3937 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@ndibunwapeter9013this person really tryna argue that gravity isn’t real

  • @iwatchyoutube202
    @iwatchyoutube202 15 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    The Miller-Urey Experiment proves that abiogenesis is in fact not ridiculous but a very statistically possible idea.

    • @mikewiggins7257
      @mikewiggins7257 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Its follow-on experiments with more accurate entering environment data have just kept adding to the viability of abiogenesis.

    • @ndibunwapeter9013
      @ndibunwapeter9013 13 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Abiogenesis is trash, non Life somehow for no reason created life, give me examples of abiogenesis with observable evidence.

    • @tomyossarian7681
      @tomyossarian7681 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@ndibunwapeter9013 2 atoms of oxygen bond and form a molecule of oxygen for no reason whatsoever. Than the molecule of oxygen bonds with a hydrogen atom to form a molecule of water and so on...

  • @deathfeel
    @deathfeel 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

    This doesn't proof anything. It's just an opinion.

    • @gail4331
      @gail4331 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

      It proves evolution is not true.

  • @BradCarlMusic
    @BradCarlMusic 13 วันที่ผ่านมา

    0+0 = 0 for a reason

    • @aidanya1336
      @aidanya1336 11 วันที่ผ่านมา

      0^0 = 1 so i am not sure what you are trying to prove.

    • @BradCarlMusic
      @BradCarlMusic 11 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@aidanya1336You don't get something from nothing.

    • @aidanya1336
      @aidanya1336 11 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@BradCarlMusic of course not. Nothing doesn't even have a good definition within science. Since we usually define things by what they are and not by what they are not.
      "nothing" as in the absence of everything isn't therefor even a coherent scientific concept.
      This is why you only find it in philosophy and not in reality.
      Even 0 in math is not the same as "nothing".
      Can you give a single example of anyone ever experiencing, seeing or detecting "nothing"?
      Anyway. Something from nothing isn't a thing i (or any atheists i know) believe happened.
      Here is a fun exercise. everytime you hear someone say "something from nothing" check whether it is an atheist or a christian saying this. 99.99% of the time it will be a christian apologist talking about what atheists believe. Not an atheist talking about what they believe.

    • @BradCarlMusic
      @BradCarlMusic 11 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@aidanya1336 And anytime you hear someone say "science" 99.9% of the time it's an atheist....

  • @paulhaynes3688
    @paulhaynes3688 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Cliff delusional in the extreme

  • @nagranoth_
    @nagranoth_ 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

    No, he didn't. He shows his massive willful ignorance and stupidity.

  • @williamstrumfels3305
    @williamstrumfels3305 13 วันที่ผ่านมา

    can you get something from nothing....word salad that proves zero

    • @ohisheh
      @ohisheh 13 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Well apparently you can get God from nothing!

  • @victorguzman2302
    @victorguzman2302 10 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Same empty arguments that these religious people use to try to “prove” the existence of a supernatural being of their choice, according to the religion they profess. Wouldn’t be easier to ask your gif to show himself (it’s a man, right?) and that way we’ll know he is real….

  • @maccarnold
    @maccarnold 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

    The guy arguing has not a very single good point. He is only saying things that are not logically possible.

  • @rndmavis
    @rndmavis 10 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Holy moly. 1+1=2? Doesn't put money is his bank account? He has to put his money into a creator? What a madman

  • @JSmoove355
    @JSmoove355 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Cliffe is absolute trash

  • @shreddedhominid1629
    @shreddedhominid1629 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

    What does "you don't get something from nothing" have to do with the evolution of the eye? What an utterly irrelevant point. Cliff is just admitting he doesn't understand evolutionary biology lol.

  • @user-yf7vv7qf7n
    @user-yf7vv7qf7n 19 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I once got nothing from something